Not everybody, quantity and quality in its time and stifle copy was caught Alps S Party your day and today will be even better than usual, and I know it's a pretty I bar but watch me clear it no problem at all. You need to join me clearing that bar and having the best day, if a red, thanks to the simultaneous up, all you need is a couple of my glass. A tanker tells us that campaigns are classed vessels. Felicity favorite liquid. I coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope of either the day the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous. I think you ve heard of it, and it's going to happen now. Go

I think I added a little extra slurping to that one, just to get a little little extra. Kick yeah! Well, how do you all feel today better right? Yes for the fleas, oxygenated you get to take off your masks, some places. Now when I say that you are fully vaccinated, people can take off there. I dont mean in my state now, Noto California's, unlike other places, so just because, say they say finally said it's safe to take off your mask if you're fully vaccinated, except in specific cases,.

Well, that did not change the policy in New York or California, in which the governors Bowl said. Wait a minute can take your masks off. Yet how does that make you feel if here in New York or California, tell you how it makes me feel? I'm not gonna. Listen to this anymore now Course you have to listen to businesses or, if you want to get on a plane, and they ve got a really have to listen to that. But I just can't listen to the governors on this. I just don't respect their authority and would not would not planned to. Bad at all. So I'm a few days away from my second vaccination another week or so, and can somebody give effect check out this? Is a person considered fully vaccinated at the moment they get their second shot.

or is it another two weeks after the shock? Can somebody give you a ruling on that and is it the same for all three types of vaccinations? Well, one of them has just one. This is to it. So what I'm wondering is is the two weeks, Also applicable to this, the to those something maybe a little different messages. Your list figure that out before the end of the day, seems pretty important.

So I'm saying two weeks after, but I think there might be a difference between what the scientific peak is and what the social legal guidelines peak is. In other words, maybe you can still fly if you just got your second vaccination, but may be technically you're not fully vaccinated. Is it going to be some like that, so we need some clarity on this very important point and surprised given how important it is and surprise is not a prominent part of the news, and it should be so used to good use, people blaming the CDC for being slow due to do this. But the pagoda I've gotta go against the grain a little bit and say that the CDC does have an obligate.

to be a little safer than you and I might choose for ourselves. I don't feel like I can blame the CDC for waiting for. I guess they waited to find, though, if the variants would be handled by the vaccinations, and apparently they are at least so far, and I think there is some more information. They got about vaccinations and transmission, so they did wait until they had all the information Sure you would want that to be different, even if you and I would have been different. and because you would, I would just be deciding for ourselves, but if it's your job to make the recommended I know that I care that they wait a few extra weeks. Like that's responsible, some I've course

make critic of the city see for the things they get wrong, but I just can't I care for them for being a little extra cautious compared to what individuals would do, that's kind of where you want it. I don't think you to one of the other way. I don't think you'd want these easy to take more chances than an individual would with her own life. I don't think you'd want that. So we have plenty to complain about with the cdc, but I'm not going to complain about this one. I M going to complain about my governor. I don T quite understand why my governor thinks thinks the vaccinated people still need a mask, as I said before, the public will lead on. This apparently will have to do, and I think that what I am fully vaccinate

I would certainly obey worthy business wanted me to do, because businesses can set their own rules right. Private business says you gotta do this? Are you gonna do that you gotta where she yeah a private business, can tell you to our shores. sure Jews, so I don't have any problem with any private business, but I sure, as hell, the momentum fully vaccinated, I'm not gonna, be my governor, who tells me I gotta keep my mask on. If I, what walk down the sidewalk or southern there's no way, I'm good obey the governor. If he's, if he opposes the CDC recommendation, though be dumb now I get that each state is different, but not different enough. Yeah we're all different war, not that different. So there there has to be a point where the public

Leads because the government is not a good entity to do it. The governments are, the governments. Incentive is maximum safety, whereas a human beings incentive is maximum life, which might mean a little less safety. Cleverly chosen So I dont think that we should depend on our government or really them force them to make the decision for us. I think we should make the decision now. Is everybody with me that that, at this point now that the crisis point is not quite over or serve on the border of the crisis bargaining over. You want government to be in charge when it's a crisis right, you know they are not perfect, but your best bet is an emergency is to listen to the government one

the emergency is over and we all have a kind of similar information. There incentives of yours might not be aligned and yours matter bore right. It once we're out of the car Isis, if your individual citizen opinion differs from your government, I back you. This is because your government is the wrong entity to judge whether Europe safety verses. Your life decisions are right once it's not across crisis, if you're the crisis. Yes, Let the government led, but now it's time for the government to get out of the way

sera that were on the border of that point where the citizens just have to take it upon themselves. I think I think we just have to make it a fact by the way we act. So I wouldn't matter if you had mask mandates. If nobody put on a mask is now like they can enforce it. If everybody just through us through either mask once that would be. So don't imagine that the government has control over this you, the citizens, have complete control from about this point. Are you did not have complete control in the past? From now on, you do have control

returning to you and those people who this is another time to check your predictions. Were you one of the people who thought that the government was going to make you wear masks forever? No matter what did you ever think that cuz? If you did, I don't think that was a good prediction. I feel like a lot of people are saying it and I kept thinking to myself now. I'm pretty sure this is temporary. Yeah, but you still hear people saying saying that I will have to wear masks forever or under certain situations forever. I don't think so. So I think this is going just the way we wanted it to now, of course, is to lead mess for travel for a while- and I guess

a situation in which a number of the Yankees baseball team got got infected despite all being vaccinated. So a number of people play for the Yankees had the J J one shot vaccination but have since become infected. Now, there's no evidence that I think most of them have no symptoms. One might have a little bit so they're, all they also perfectly safe, which is all What are the vaccination, so the vaccinations working as the Good NEWS, but it is clear now all although it has been removed that appeared will you can catch the virus fairly easily? Even if you have the vaccination, but don't you want to know if that applies to all the banks.

Nations, because the Yankees all have the J J, the one child vaccination, which we know to be a little less less powerful but powerful enough to keep you from dying. So if the Yankees had had the murder or the Pfizer, would they have done and justice? Second, after getting vaccinated, don't know, but every time we hear about one of these people getting getting infected after vaccination such as Bill MAR apparently bill are in and by the way, is it possible to go through a Friday without bill? More being you man lives. When was the last Friday, there was not a headline about bill more. What's going on with that. I feel like it's telling us something right because a lot of political pundits, but why is Bill Marr.

Always in the news on Friday in his shoulders on Friday, so that's the trigger for it, but is he is he's so newsworthy That every Friday he's gonna be like a political statement and here's the answer Yes, yes, he is exactly that newsworthy, because and the reason is newsworthy, is that he is simply not easily identifiable with fully fully hypnotized on the left were fully hypnotized. Other right he's carved out a unique position where he can follow the science or the logic as best it can now. Of course, I disagreed with Bill MAR number of topics over the years so saying he always gets it right according to me, as if

if my judgement is the final word on things, but I do think he's carved out a special place in America as a person who intend to tell the truth. And has some capability to do it because he does seem a little bit resistant to cognitive dissonance, not completely, because none of us are completely free from confirmation bias regarding distance is not a thing. A person can do you. You can't be free of that, but he is freer than most.

And I think part of the reason you can't be free is, if you have a little bit a history of taking positions on each side that you're you're cognitive dissonance, is and can be, triggered by being locked into an opinion, your unwilling to change. So speaking of predictions, I thought this would be a good time now that we ve got a few serve Biden so the way we ve got a sense of Biden at this point when you say I dont know, if what Biden has done so far will be perfectly predictive of what he does to the rest of his presidency. However, long lass But we ve got a good sense of it now and I would say this would be a good turn to go back and check your tromp related predictions. for how he would do in office than what would have. But after we left office

How Biden would do in office? How are your predictions. Without even talk about any details. Yet in the comments how many of you feel that your predictions were relatively accurate, you know nobody's going to get every topic, but do you think that what you thought Trump would do? He largely did. And do you think that the way by Biden is performing is largely what you expected? Let's see your predictions, my my prediction about your predictions: is they cognitive dissonance will cause everybody to believe they were accurate. So so Azure all telling me how accurate you're o Ashley surpluses fifty fifty. So whoever just said fifty fifty, you might be the most aware, a person whose answering this quest.

And not because you're you're predictions were only fifty fifty, but because you know that have any people here were right: half the time and are also aware of it very rare. So whoever said they were right only about fifty percent of the time You're operating properly at a higher level of awareness, the lot of the rest of the public because most of us- and I'm definitely in this category most of us take week about ninety percent right and we even have different predictions about. If you asked the the biggest. Trump Hater Warrior predictions correct. That would say: oh yeah totally my predictions were correct. He he colluded with Russia, which didn't happen. He said that the Nazis and Charleville were fine people, which literally didn't happen. It was a hoax. He told us to

bleach, which didn't happen since you are I'm going right, both the left and the right things are predictions are accurate, because the the fake news will tell everybody they got it right and then your memory will fill in all this will give you cognitive, dissonance and rewrite your memories. So let ask, this specifically, how many Democrats believed there once Trump was out of office. There was one thing you knew for sure: he was in deep, deep legal trouble. right was anybody on the left. Anybody was, or even one person who is anti tromp, literally even one person who believe that he would still be a free man, a few months after leaving office, And indeed, we heard today that there were some move to, get a hold of policy

I'm not good at making notes. I didn't write that down. when the Trump world there is apparently the boot. One of these employees as the Trump Organization there looking into some payments about school or something and thinking to myself, If we are hearing a leak about somebody who works in the Trump Organization, not trump himself, and not a family member to somebody high in the organization whose being investigated for some specific things that they did and maybe not even trump himself. But you ve heard of it right, but why you haven't heard is anything the sounds like a smoking gun that would put trumpet jail or even in great legal peril. Have you that doesn't seem to me that that it wasn't long ago, the all the smart people on the left were saying well

this banking thing and surely they will find this tax is right. How long do you have to wait before before you do? You can say there is no legal least no, no fatal risk for trump legally, I feel as if all of his legal problems were either fake, or they were things that could be handled in the normal course of a rich person defending themselves against legal claims. And do you believe that you would have heard a credible leak by now if they had found some kind of like really good stuff to get trump and trouble? But you have you now? How long do you wait before you can conclude? That means something. I don't know I'm in the legal world, maybe after waiting here right.

But how long is the district of was the southern district of New York? How long has the state of New York Ben looking into Trot a year, giving an estimate spent a year right or more than a year, And not a single lake no arrest and the And then one one leg does come out: it's a leak about somebody else, it's as if they found somebody else's problem, but they didn't find jobs, although I think job as part of the story, but it's not clear how so There are some services at least two years that they ve been investigating. Did you if you predicted here be in jail by now. I guess you're wrong. If you predicted you'd be in deep legal trouble, I dont know I feel as if we now

Right if they were closing in on him- and you know how they see their noise reports, that the walls are closing in If any of that were happening, they'd be reporting right because they love those stuff they be making it up, they deliver do if it were not happening. Our did make it known so the prosecutors Wall Street Journal had prosecutors, subpoenaed, Manhattan, private school, for information relating to Trump Organization, chief financial officer and his two grandchildren. Does that sound like Trump himself is in trouble, really doesn't does it sounds like they just found, some unrelated, Our ears, the big other story- Israel, of course, is responding to Hamas mosses.

More than a thousand rockets fired and Gaza into israel- and I dont know if you saw this news, but reportedly I don't think you can believe any new. that comes out of a war zone. But, let's say is true for conversation as long as you accept the premise that all reporting during the beginning of a military action. The odds of any of this reporting being accurate kind of low, but let's say it is reportedly the israeli defense forces tricked us into believing there was going to be a ground invasion. Now early in the event of a ground invasion is really was aware that the Hamas militants would flood into this major network of tunnels that they have and that they would be able to come out of the tunnels to attack. You have any tanks that were coming

add a ground invasion, and so Israel faked Hamas into filling the tunnels with their fighters, and then they bombed the tunnels and they didn't invade. So the invasion was a head shake. one of the better Hendricks I've ever heard of in the military world. If it's true again, I would I would to sign a credibility to this whole set of stories about Israel in the tunnels. Fifty percent, maybe maximum sixty percent- tops just because his wars- and you don't get accurate information policy issue now You see. morbid but interesting facts about this number one. When you bomb a network of tunnels, do they all collapse and then kill those people in them instantly?

I don't think so right, isn't it more likely that maybe fighters would be trapped in the tunnel that had been partially collapsed. You know, maybe they couldn't get out, but they're not immediately dead. probably right how many of those people who would be presumably trapped in a collapsed. But still alive, how many Heather cellphones with them.

And if they had their cell phones, whether they be using them right as it get me out of here, start big, and at that point, can Israel just put some surveillance above where they think the tunnels are and just watch where the digging use or better yet? Can they just detect exactly where the phones embalming again, because I was its yet they would suffocate eventually, but there was still have time to use or cell phones if they were alive if they had so it's possible that they don't bring cellphones door right, but I think even our soldiers green Cellphones does not know the answer that maybe the dough, maybe they don't, but obviously the use em off duty. Now here's the other interesting thing: whenever there's somebody gets killed under Marseille, theirs burial and everything, but

the real morbid thought, if you kill people in tunnels, if you kill people in tunnels, there's no body. Israel found a way to kill mass numbers of Hamas terrorists without ever anybody filming Abbadie, I'm guessing so in terms of persuasion? Israel used persuasion to get them into the tunnels to bomb and they get the second benefit of persuasion that there are no photographs of dead bodies and if they ever showed their dead bodies, they wouldn't they witness at their prime look like just somebody asleep, because they all their body parts would be attack if they died. The tunnel

So this my end up here, I think, will learn more about this, but this can easily end up as one of the great military moves of all time is morbid as it is. So Rasmussen is reporting again and other situation in which watching to see them, MSNBC makes you're dumber now to be fair. If they had asked about other topics such as, let's say, support for a cure. Non probably more Republicans would have support for Cuban on then for Democrats. So you have to you just be aware that the questions that are being asked skew in one direction.

Some point will probably see some questions in the other direction, but here's the outcome fairly. Nearly a quarter of sea then viewers and nineteen percent of MSNBC viewers think cops shot more than five hundred on armed black suspects last year, but only nine percent of Fox news viewers. So spray big difference. So if you watch the CNN or MSNBC you have a suddenly like eight ten times inaccurate view of what's happening with police and the black unarmed Americans. Ten times you wouldn't even be close, but Fox viewers, pretty accurate.

I think that a quarter of CNN viewers think edged cops are shooting five hundred other black black suspects a year. The numbers closeness, fifty so one tenth of them say did you do too and I was wondering: does the mental health industry recognise journalistic abuse as a sort of the victim category, a mental health problem imagine you imagine, you're a viewer of CNN and enter MSNBC, as being of Europe was a Fox news. if you are to believe the opinion, people on Fox NEWS that. Maybe George Soros is gonna, have control of everything and it's all a big. It's all big plan

for something you might be a little worried, but you probably wouldn't spend much of your day worrying about it like it wouldn't intrude on the rest of your day. You probably just be thinking about it when you're talkin, politics, But if you watch to see them as we see, you believe that you can be done at any minute. You think that the Climate is gonna, kill you or your grandchildren. You would think that if you take a ride in your car and your skin, his brown, your advocating shot, is pretty pretty high. So and of course, you would have thought that tromp was going to start a nuclear war. You'd have thought he was going to round up gay people and put him in concentration camps. I mean nothing even. Those two reality, but you would have thought that and those are the kinds of fears. Are you actually fear day to day? You know the world's round by white supremacist? I think I see one.

Those are the things you worry about in the moment. I feel as if there's a difference and what the in what conservatives worry about that isn't true. So if we just take the Cuban on example or George Soros, but you don't like that example, probably. there are things that the right believes that are clearly not true, but they also are things. I don't kill you immediately, there's like consent. You're system shifts overtime and boys. The left is what in about stuff, they will kill you right now or if not now is gonna get your grandchildren. What sort of specific and dangerous there's gotta be a mental health problem. There's no way around that. there is news out of the Arizona wanted that I dont believe, but the the report is that some major database was

deleted before the other people can get their hands on it? Now, if that happened, and if it was intentional, probably mean something, but do you think anybody would ever going to jail for deleting a database that should have been deleted? Probably not because the defence would be easy, the defence would be whoops, psych oops. I forgot that this was one of the machines there. We were supposed to keep the data or whoops. I told Bob to take care of the machines, but what I meant was to keep them safe,

when when he heard take care the machines, he thought he would do the normal maintenance, which included wiping the database so nobody's gonna, go to jail right. There's no crime here. Why wouldn't they delete it right if through? If anything was on their than might look suspicious? Why wouldn't you delete it? There's just not going to be a penalty, for I can't imagine there would be enough evidence to put somebody jail for it. I think they'll just say all big mistake. Sorry, whoops Yelp bureaucracy, things! Things are very clear. and then we have. Apparently the auditors are also asking dominion for their passwords to submissions and demand. in the same now. This has actually unto far and they couldn't give them passwords machine

to which I say to myself. There's something about the story I dont understand: do all the machines have the same password. Somebody says you were so dead wrong about dominion. I haven't talked about dominion. Yet what do you think I'm wrong about? Come back? Come back here, I L Green says you are so dead wrong about dominion. Do you know how often. People who tell me I'm wrong can accurately described my opinion almost never almost, never El Green. I will challenge you to describe my opinion in the justice statement. Like you believe, acts.

And then tell me what's wrong with it start with accurately describing my opinion, you can't do it, you know you can't do it right, try just give it a shot just in the sentence or two. What do you think my opinion was that you're, just yeah? I can't watch every penny go by, but if anybody sees it, you will know that this is the normal way people debate, they literally hallucinate my opinion, and then they get pretty worked up about a wrong. It is. What was the last time? Somebody disagreed with me

also understood. What I was saying now lot lack ensure happens was very rare, I would say at least ninety percent of all the people agreeing with disagreeing with me. Kid state my pain, because I tend to have some new ones that escapes most political, budgetary inheres James Bond says Scots opinion is a moving target. Now, that's the other hallucination, because, with the way cognitive dissonance works and if you haven't seen in, inaction. It goes like this. I say the the sky is blue and then you say: how can you say the sky is green and then

I say not and say that I said the sky is blue, which you agree with and then because cognitive dissonance kicks him, and nobody can believe that they heard green when I said Bellew nobody, we can process that, because that would be their mistake. They immediately imagine it was a different conversation. Ah well, yes, maybe you did say the sky was blue but why are you saying it's raining to which I say Reign was never. Even in the conversation I just said, the sky was blue. You heard it is When I prove to you as blow and that I said blow, Lesabre recording, there's something you and me Really hallucinated that I had said it was raining now. that example sound like we're, not the specific sky example, though you put different kind. Denton there does that sound like something that really happens like it.

Actual World Wilson but his memory be rewritten that quickly, yes, yes at easily easily routinely can't annually right, that's situation! It is more like the operating system of humans. We do that instantly. All of us every one of us, What are we dont know what other people said, because once we have disagreed with them, we. their stay in our illusion, or they prove us wrong and we just spontaneously created new illusion where we were right all along. That's our wired,

once you realise that the world is not less confusing, sir, where this question of whether feta cheese supported gain of function. Recent tat one- and I tell you this- is such a frustrating story, because the way as reported is so poor that we consumers really dont, know what that's about. You can't think you do, but you know here's what I. think, is happening, I feel as though there is some evidence that Fauci You are then I age or he may have supported them. They did reportedly again, I'm not the expert yourself. Put a put a little doubt about anything. I say on this topic, but reportedly there was some support for a gain of function, but not for the coronavirus. I mean not for this. You know covid or whatever. It is not for the specific virus,

and it might not have every game function. for military use, it might have been gained a function just to improve it for regular purposes, research or something So I feel as though the people saying that found did support gain of function are probably- Correct at the same time, when he says absolutely not he's, probably correct, I believe we ve hit this weird situation. Where both sides are saying completely true things, but they're not really on the same topic, and that's that I think that's the illusion

I think the illusion is- are on the same topic and they're not really on the same topic, so check that out for me to give me a fact check on that. I think that that there was gain a function for a different different virus, so in Fauci denies that he's denying it for the coronavirus version of it. I think which doesn't mean is anything wrong with algae, so my hypothesis would clear faulty. While also making ran Paul's accusation, true just they weren't. On the same topic, I think that's my that's my working hypothesis at the moment.

and I soon see some excellent comments, for example wrong wrong. Now you might be new to me, but when people's comment is just wrong without any further explanation or even detail, of which one is wrong, I usually block you, but I feel sphere. It gives Give you a warning this time, because I don't mention luck. Sizes knows about funding release the virus was perfectly timed, somebody says was it I heard some people say that the CDC allowing the vaccinated to take off

In most situations was, maybe a white House trick to divert from some of the other things are saying: Ashley your correct and benevolent host. I suppose that being something. All right- oh yes, oh yes, somebody says, is curious. How the Hong Kong protests were squashed by the virus. Yes, that is interesting is that was that China,

getting lucky you're, not on the side. This as the China intentionally released a virus. It said it certainly interesting to look at and you can make an argument that it helped China in some way and hurt him people also maybe it would have made sense, but I just don't see anybody releasing a virus on their own country to take out America I mean, maybe maybe do you believe in luck about. If you asked me about luck. Here's my take on luck is generally believed that you can't change your luck. That lock is just like

there's nothing you can do about it, but that of course, is completely wrong because you can go where your odds are better. For example, you have more chance of getting a job if you apply for one so you can compare the lock of somebody who didn't apply for any jobs to somebody who applied for a bunch of jobs, hey that personal life or for jobs got jobs person it in got no job. So, most of the time, what looks like lock is just people who have not taken the the high probability path, verses people

took a low probability path and got exactly what you expect if you're building years skills stack and your networking and new staying in jail and you staying off drugs, your odds of luck, finding you are really really good. So I've told you before that one way to hack lock is do do a lot of stuff, just create a lot of energy cuz if you're doing a lot of stuff and you make a noise and creating energy. Your drawing room, forces to you your odds of something lucky happening in a situation where justice lots of energy is very good here if you're lucky, sitting alone in the cabin in the middle of a field and men Montana, very low, there's no energy. There there's

no probabilities whirling around you, nothing there's no possibility. So, although you can't directly control luck as in controlling points lip, you can definitely go where there's plenty of it and you can stay away from where there isn't much. Let me give you a concrete example, and some of you ve heard the example, but I'll put it in this context. When. working on some start up stuff and getting into the crypto world. I said to myself gosh I dont have any immediate need or purpose to know about crypto. Nor do I need to necessarily be involved in it, but I knew it was a high energy area that was growing and there was no way lots of stuff happening and the opportunity for a lock was high because it was so much

urging. So if you just go where there's a lot of energy, luck can sort of just find you because its around all, The place so I went quite consciously I went where there was all this energy encrypted and some of you heard the story that I did a bunch of things and then I walked away from it, and I had forgotten that I'd left her a small amount of crypto in one of my crypto wallets, didn't even know it was there. turned out to be a cerium and a syrian one. On a run. Last I checked: that's, I think it probably started around five thousand dollars or something.

Alas, I checked it was three hundred and forty nine thousand dollars complete. Look. I never made a decision to invest. In fact, I had bought the Assyrian for transactions. I was gonna spend it. I just got diverted forgot ahead of their so this is a perfect example of going where they energy is. Leyla around and then getting lucky and the number of times that that the same person will get lucky happens a lot. because that one person is simply following the energy and going wherever there's a lot of it and they'll get lucky again and again and again, but if you're not doing anything, if you not creating in the energy and the activity, no luck,

not going to find you so fine. I energy places flail around long enough for luck to find you! It's worked all of my life whenever I go to a high energy place, luck eventually fingers I, where I am. any chance. If you writing another novel interesting. So the thing those closest to a novel than I wrote was called the religion war which predicted twenty years ago, and I wrote it is predicted that there would be armed drones.

Attacking cities in stock, and I think we'll see that. But I don't think I don't have a immediate craving to write a novel fiction. I just don't like fiction as much the ones I wrote were because they were predictions, so they weren't just fiction. They were predictions wrapped up in fiction. Yeah I did make I mean so far. I did make something like three hundred and fifty thousand

Thousand dollars do every suggestions, Vodafone Twitter, with more liberal, left, leaning views. Let me think, yes for red silk area on CNN smirk. Scottish on CNN shall think is the more you know. It's always hard to come up with examples when somebody hit me up like that, but we consistently Jimmy Door Jimmy Door. We Goodwin thanking suggestion. Gabriel's have some suggestions that the wine STI ones

those were they do. They identify is liberal. I shall I don't even know how they are. Then, why are you Glenn, Glenn Greed, Walled Mattei, be those who is best is is TIM of TIM cast? Does he identifies liberal? I don't know Temple. I don't know I feel as if I wouldn't want to label him in anyway. He doesn't label himself so MRS chain I get it anyway, there's that's. Your start said: navigate chicken Thus I got for today, and I will talk to you tomorrow,.