The very best part of everyday no exceptions and today will be extra extra good because it always is- and all you need is a couple of our groundwater tanker- tells us ninety Kantian geography, vessel of any kind Hilary favorite liquid. I like coffee, join me now for the and her little pleasure. The dopamine here are the day the thing that makes everything better everything. It's called the simultaneous, but it's getting up and right now go.

I hope it was just as good for you. Well, let's talk about all the faint news. Let me ask you a question was any of the news today, real like any of it. Sometimes I wonder, let's get into it so Fox loses reporting the sea and then had a guest on nine different times. Who according to Fox NEWS, was just making up a story about a run dissenters, governor dissenters, pressuring people to fudge the data grown virus now, reportedly, there's no truth whatsoever to this.

current Vocs Fox NEWS Cnn had her on nine times nine times fairly. There's no truth to it. There's no substance whatsoever. And Chris Cuomo had arrived at least five times were exactly five times, and that was in the context of talking up his brother and talking down Florida. It just completely completely unethical behaviour. Calling to Einstein the simultaneous suppers now simultaneous because different frames of reference well. I hate you got all Einstein early, but your technically correct so What do you make of the fact the CNN had based?

Secondly, a liar nine different times, so you totally trust the rest of their news right. Just because this part, a news was absolutely totally fraudulent and I have to wonder what does that tell you about the things that you can't know whether its true or not, because when you can tell, will you have the ability to look into a story and know for sure what was true at the end, then you can look back and see how the coverage was, but Is it a coincidence that whatever we can verify story is false? Are you worried about that that whenever you can verify it for sure its false. But all of those other things you can verify because there's you sort of difference

in the science or the interpretation, and the opinion of the facts are not clear. Oh that's all true, that's all good, but those few times when you can actually check and find out for sure if the story was true or false raw, false sprawly. Just a coincidence, re exaggerate Incas recently does not all the stores of holes, Steve Cortez may be left to day. I think he's learned learned a few tricks from President Trump in how to insult people well of Ebay. This up, but he referred to Doktor, fell GS, a fascist, NOME, fascist known how many they laugh at that.

And it is thus virtually trump level cleverness not enough. He made that up, but if you did is pretty funny- and I guess Doktor felt, she admitted warnings mask a little longer than the science required indoors anyway, just too short and try to be consistent with the cities. His recommendation, so we do now that doctor found she seems to me The least a little bit of a distinction between what is scientifically correct in what is a messaging priority? So there are well, I'm not gonna. Be is harsh on Doktor felt she the fascist known, because because I think his job is partly science.

Importantly, messaging and partly persuasion, and if he was doing exactly that science plus persuasion plus messaging, I'm ok with you, I get it totally understand the criticism that he departed a little bit from the science and in that house is credibility. But if your job also is messaging. I'm gonna, give him ass origin of covert? Have I read it by liquid Wade? I have not read it I. This is the second time I ve heard about in two days. I am hearing good things about it, but I don't know anything about it. I also don't know that matters. Does it does it matter I say we know for sure that there was a game. testing on the virus and they came out of the way. Our lab then work that, while nothing right, then what is nothing

there is no difference, is, is information which were curious about but doesn't have any function, because don't you think that is a guarantee that the big laboratories somewhere are doing gain function? Testing, I think so, do you think the United States isn't doing any gave a function, testing Really, really, you think Russia is on doing any really North Korea. Well, I do know that North Korea, but if they thought they would. So I just don't know that it makes any difference if we we know it or not, because I think we can without doing any research that is happening problem finally, and all the major companies countries labs- probably so, if we found out for sure, does it make any difference, maybe we try harder to not let one out

But I have to feel you after feel, that we always try hard to not let out a deadly pandemic virus. I just don't know what would be different now. If somebody has a suggestion of what we would do differently. Maybe we'd put more pressure on China or something, but what difference would it make they respond to more pressure there? Just gonna say we didn't do it if we could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it was a weapon eyes virus that came out of the room lab while which I to say it wasn't that's the end of it as we enter the trail. Yes, it was no, it wasn't. But yes, it was look at all over evidence. You pride made it up now seriously is really good evidence. Look at it. Look at our evidence

you been up. We live in a world in which facts just don't make any difference for stuff like this, so it be great. Now I may just out of curiosity bears no function Msnbc host Ellie Multi. has declared that Israel treatment of the Palestinians is apartheid and, of course, there's a little push back on that, as you might expect and part of his argument- is that the Israelis are gobbling up land that used to bleed belong to the. Palestinians, and that through using legal tricks beyond national defence and lots Lots of rationalizations gobble up land, but seldom answer now, I feel as if that characterisation, at least of the gobbling up land, seems fair.

Right. I'm chaser knew tat my life streams, I'm very very pro Israel and their right to defend themselves, but I think it's a fact that there are gaps, gobbling up land, billing building settlements and stuff very intentionally very strategic and, as I always say, I can criticise any country from doing what is available to them to improve their situation. We do it, any country would do it, so you can complain buzz like to stop people. Countries are supposed to feel. I was in their best interests and Israel is clearly doing that to the possible detriment of other people, but that's how it works. Unfortunately, now use I take this whether or not the apartheid claim fits the facts. There is clear,

play some stuff going on over there, that's better for one group than another look really. We can certainly agree that not everybody is in the same situation right, whether label and apartheid. That's just the politics. But my take on this is that as long as Hamas as a state, players of destroying Israel. Israel has a free pass let me say that again: if somebody, her in your life says my plan is to kill you eventually till late, just kill you eventually. I may not do today. eventually I got do everything in my power, my top priority to kill you. somebody life who said that, and they meant it not bluffing Actually, there plan to kill you some day.

Do you have a moral and ethical, the same oil? Moral and ethical right to kill them first, yes, yes, you do absolutely somebody's is making a credible threat that they will kill you, maybe not today, but eventually and you believe it and they have a history. The rooms. They do this kind of thing. Yes, your ethically and morally complete We were then your right to slay them where they stand, even if they haven't lifted a hand against you now you will go to jail forever right. I mean this murder, so is not legal or close the legal, but it is morally and ethically completely fair completely. Now this is a situation.

doesn't really exists in the real world. There are not people who make credible claims that they will someday, kill you, except for a stalker. I suppose, in which case you ve been killed stalker And if you put me on the jury I'll, let you out, but I don't, I don't, recommend killing a stalker. Let me say it again: if you kill a stalker And I'm on the jury, you're in good shape, Dory about it. but if I'm not on the jury, you might have to worry about twelve other people convicted you, so I don't recommend it But let me say unambiguously: if you ever kill your stalker, and I'm on the jury. You're not gonna, get connected as long as the facts support that it was a real threat and a real stalker. If you tell him I'm ok with it, I don't recommend it. Don't do it. Let me be clear.

Do not kill your stock lesser in immediate danger, so it's not advice, but I dont like stalkers I am likewise. I dont like Abbas, saying that they're gonna destroy Israel, eventually, no matter what they do and this law, ass, their position. With Israel doing anything they want within within reason, I mean if they try to. Literally kill everybody in Gaza wouldn't be in favour and that, where anything close to it but I don't think there's any ethical or moral problem whatsoever, legal problems. Yes, they have to deal with our separately. But no more no moral or ethical problems gobble up that land masses just made it easy for them to do it.

Apparently there is a group of science deniers advising the. Why else interesting turn of events? Wouldn't you say, let me give you some details there's. Something called the way. houses, environmental justice, advisers, environmental justice, advisers. And their opposing both nuclear energy and carbon capture projects do, I need to say more, You could not be more anti science that opposing the two things that pretty much, all scientists say required and way better than the alternatives, carbon capture. If we, if we become more efficient at its not quite there yet and nuclear power and the binding administration is pro nuclear power, Right so their own advisers, or revising them against something they know to be unwise:

the advice is unwise and the Biden administration knows it so I'll give credit to the administration for knowing that this is unwise but How did they justify justify having advice. or anti science, I mean obviously and thy sites you can't get much more anti science them day against nuclear energy or carbon capture, because sizes in favour those very clearly and unambiguously. So the New England, Gironde Medicine, has little article in their saying that when the two doze vaccinations were tested, apparently they tested the efficacy of the second knows soon. After

the first so when they did a trial that in a way this long for the second, those as we are in reality. and the importance of that Apparently you can do some magic with the numbers. I'm not sure. I totally trust the analysis, but I'll just tell you what they came up with, which is at the first those. might have been away more effective than we thought, because the first I was still increasing in protection at the time that they gave him the second doze So when they were testing the efficacy of the first, those there was like closer to fifty percent, but it was still increasing. So they didn't really test the efficacy of the first steps. So this is the important point. The efficacy of the first dose of to those treatment wasn't really analyzed because our sort of in a hurry now may

a little bit of an assumption that the second dose would be important so that they can have stuck together a little closer, but apparently you can use some statistics and math and analysis, and and Entangled untangled, situation, and what do you do it makes the first those look like it's almost ninety three percent effective when it reaches its beak. now it might not last long, and that would be an argument for the second dose. But Here is my argument. Feel as though we're gonna get to her immunity. sooner than the experts are saying and here's. Why sorry something just set off my security camera. But it was a bird we're good nobody's, attacking the house.

So here is my argument: the experts are saying that we might need seventy five to eighty five percent people to get vaccinate. Do you believe that do you believe that will need seventy five? Eighty five percent of the people to give vaccinated to have her Demille well here's what I think now that we know the first of active is effective, and this is in some states we're getting pretty close to sixty percent of people who had the first steps at least the first those now if this were a generic pandemic, where. All people were affected sort of similarly chill Got it as badly as middle age, people as badly as adults of the older, the elderly willows getting worse, but. But if it were more spread out, then that sixty percent seventy percent heard immunity thing makes sense right

But what happens when we have a situation where you get almost all of the vulnerable people vaccinated, which is where we are right now, We almost probably have all of the old people vaccinated. Now the people were on vaccinated are mostly children who don't really have a risk which is different from other pandemics. So if you add to that the fact that the first those we have were approaching, sixty percent is like fifty sixty percent in most states. I think we're there or just right almost there, because if you added to the sixty percent the children who don't make a difference, And you added to that other people have natural immunity. Maybe it's not as good as vaccination. Maybe it is

and then on top of the people, would natural immunity? You add people because they had the virus. Once you have. The people have some kind of cross reactive immunity. Types of grown virus, apparently gives you a little bit of immunity. I feel like maybe we're there like right on the edge where it's just gonna fall off a cliff any day now now, I'm not saying you should throw your mess away or anything else. I'm not telling you anything, I'm just saying that if I had to guess I'm going to guess that we get to something a functional heard immunity. Does this weird situation of getting all the vulnerable people first and the kids don't really need it. I feel like we're right on the right on the cusp of heard immunity. If not already there I mean when you hear the taxes as zero deaths yesterday we might be there.

So I'm gonna be a little more optimistic than the EP experts, but I like that the experts are not as optimistic as me. Maybe it keeps. we're getting vaccinated and maybe they're helps. I know somebody we disagree. Rasmussen did a little poll in which they were testing the knowledge of Americans, and finding out that the people who CNN and MSNBC Worthy least informed of these three groups. People watched Fox NEWS were more informed, at least on the three questions at all. They'll tell you in a minute. But somewhere between Fox NEWS, who are the most well informed, And see another msnbc, who are the least well informed

There was a category in the metal people, don't wash the news as people don't watch the news, or at least television news were better informed than that people watch, CNN and Emerson be say so in order, in the order of which one informs you best. There would be Fox NEWS, those viewers where the best. People didn't watch any fuckin thing at all. They were number two and that the bottom, with CNN and MSNBC So if watching their news makes you're dumber it's a mental health problem. Now, what's the definition of a mental health problem, while the definition is not just that you're different, the definition is that effectually life in a negative way or somebody else's life in a negative way that would be a mental illness. Do you think that the people at seen in them

and we see that the people watch it and are becoming less and less well informed. Do you think that that has impact on their happiness or anybody else's. Of course, it does, of course, those the cnngo verse like they're on the planet, that's going to burn up at him and by the time their children- or you know in the middle ages that they think the old planets on fire that they think that there was an insurrection at the capitol. Just like a few months ago. The CNN of yours are definitely experiencing mental health problems, because the information that they get is panicking them and is not true. I want to give you some details here, so the questions of the s work.

health insurance income, tax rates and the debt. I think, where the three things in each of those Fox news viewers we're way more informed, relatively speaking, lots of people still didn't know anything turn off the news, yes Naval, Bob So you know sounds like I'm joking right when I say the CNN and MSNBC give you brain damage and or mental illness. I'm not joking Not even a little bit joking, that's funny, should we regulate seen unlike heroin, cocaine There are a lot of people who do cocaine, weren't complaining as Evan of money, but the people watching the news, the Wrong news, definitely getting there dumb getting dumber

And apparently, the viewers of NBC Abc Nbc similarly were under informed. so I feel like this is a real thing that has to be addressed Here's what I would love to see. I would love to see this supposin ball become a permanent, ongoing feature in which we simply report who, whose viewers are the least informed.

right, because right now we check who has the most viewers and fortunately its foxgloves, because that is the best informed, so isn't good that there are more of them, but we should be track. You ass. We should track in every month and fight now. Who's viewers are the least informed causes that should tell you something. How would you like to be in Amazon, DC or sea than viewer and to learn that your group is the least informed least well informed anyway?. Would it make any difference now, probably when you would still just do whatever you do? I gotta you update, So we ve seen several kinds of ufos and I feel like we have it Answer for all of them now, so what Because of your photos. Was this triangle. There's like the screen floating

My uncle thing to remember that when we also the video and fairly. that can be reproduced with cameras, and of a certain type there. Actually as an aperture. The closes down to that triangle. The triangle? One is nothing but a light in the sky, probably another aircraft that the camera aperture makes it look triangle triangular in certain cases, and that can be reproduced so number one The flying triangle has been debunked to take. That will offer you list. We know how that was done. It's just the way the lighting works. The aperture number two you ve got the ones where they. you can actually see like a photo of something metallic. And other ones the soon to be buzzing around in the vicinity of military assets. Well,

there's another, the theory that these are actually terrestrial drones. Now I'm going to talk about the ones that defy physics. Next, so we're not talk about them. Yet, that's it's coming up! These are just the ones that are hey, there's something here. We can explain that it seems to me buzzing around r, r, r stuff the thing is that those are actually surveillance drones that some of our young, normal earthly adversaries, are using to collect data. So the thinking is this if you send a drone toward a military asset say a Navy were or pilots there. The. The american assets will respond so. Respond as if it were a threat were as if it were something they need to look into now. That response is

Formation, their enemies would like to know so there, so they think he is that there are sending drones against our assets and that the Jones themselves as an electronic surveillance equipment and that their looking for a response and then their measuring the response so that, if there ever- were a real attack wicked the vacant anticipate what the american military would do, and I find that explanation of very good- for maybe some of it here will talk about the speed next speeds coming up. So those that do not look like their violating physics could be just drones that are unidentified now. What about the shape that they don't seem to have a form of propulsion right? We see justice shape and its oval. As always,

Seems to be oval, there's an explanation for that, its infrared, the infrared, is not going to necessarily show you the full shape of the thing. The infrared. He's going to show you where the heat differences and if it's a bird, it looks like an oval The cigar shaped object with no propulsion is what a bird looks like on infrared. Does, you don't see the wings. So it looks like there's no propulsion, but the the birds body is a different temperature that even its own wings, so the body shows up as an oval causes. indistinct object and the wings don't show up. It's just that. So you got your birds, the the like that and infrared they look like ovals now what about the defying physics? So the defy physics, things as also

debunked, and what it is is that if it, if I can do this, if I can do a visual representation of that, we use alright I'll use. My wedding ring here as the unidentified object. This remote control is the airplane flying over it and looking at it, the airplanes camera has to change direction is looking directly down and then his plane goes by is looking backwards, looking backwards right, so the perceived speed of the object will be uttered by the by the speed of the plane and the angle of the camera, and apparently smart people have looked into it and have determined that just the norm, the speed of the plane, as as is shown on the screen of the. U S, all video you can just look the actual scream worthy. You have all on this as the Angolan the higher than the speed.

and you have all the information. You need right on the screen that if you are smart enough to do the math, you can calculate that it's a bird and that is not defined. Physics is just a artifact of the camera moving and the angle moving quickly at the same time as the object is moving in another direction. So I started to say the effect is called. Relax. I believe that's right, so I believe that is every part of the UFO sightings explained. Sorry, sorry, I had to rule for you but Thirdly, Europe owes now yet people lying people miss remembering and a number of things, and you ve S image. Stop now here's one I've, I wonder

you saw the drone. They seem to splash into the water, and I joke about it. Being a bird is probably a bird, but let me ask you this: is there any such thing? Wait for it as a submarine launched. Jerome because about there is by now or or at the very least, were definitely trying to make one, because we, could be more useful. Then the eight a submarine that can launch a drone. I can't think of anything better than I could you. That would be the obvious most obvious. Most likely thing that you would want to invent is to Paradise, that you can launch from your summary now. Does that mean that that was a drone going back?

the water and returning to its submarine goody but more likely a bird just trying to get a fish, but it could be. So everything you say about speed is their parallax thing and has to do the camera angle is not there not really moving like that. It just looks like. All right got the idea of that that its we saw furthermore, our drones from enemies, phone title, a rogue away in an article in the drive. So given credit for that, others are reports, it The Pentagon has a shadow army of sixty thousand.

evil in a secretive force, with nine hundred billion budget not rebellion. I hope I'm reading there on my mother billion that right that can't be right. I just copy and paste this from an article, but really nine hundred billion. That can't be right right, I feel like I could be neither remit, But says billion, but I dont believe that were spending almost a trillion dollars. the secret army, we're just finding out about, can can the the gun hide a trillion dollars a year. What I'm a little confused by this reporting, but apparently this secret force, our people who

like a force multiplier for until agencies, but they dont report on the payroll so that they are basically people who word is pretending to be regular people and if they were caught they would have no connection that could be determined to intelligence agencies, except A activities, I guess so I had to responses number one Glad we're doing this because obviously China is other countries must be doing it. So I would think that this is. something very useful for our national defence budgets scary. Let's go, scary to find out that your government is doing stuff, but we probably need I'm not gonna complain about it. I don't know enough about it so

I think we should start calling the capital insurrection stuff a hoax. We should abandon the hopes to it like we did with the drinking bleach oaks and the fine people hoax and the russian collusion hooks than the other hoaxes. So I think there's someone needs to write the book of hoaxes for the last several years, because there are some really interesting stories about how all these hoaxes came about. But there's a short video clip on rumble that tweeted retreated this morning at its. Club showing the capital police talking to a couple of the protesters, are you ve seen on video, including the the vulgar Viking horn guy? so the guy standing next to the Viking, one guy. It's got a little love. Some kind of a loudspeaker system

and he is telling the other protesters or whatever you want to call them he's telling them. Ok, the police will work with us, the capital police, and you can see the cap please standing right next door. Having a civil conversation about what they could, we could not do please we're essentially telling them that if they would agree to be peaceful, that the Capitol police would sort of, let them peacefully protest. As long as I didn't break anything basically, which I think was good policing like feel, like the capitol police, took the energy out of the protesters in exactly the right way. At least what we saw on video, and I told you how I didn't tell you that locals. I gave him a lesson on how to defuse a fight Using hypnosis- and I noted on this video that the capital police were using the same technique and the technique, you bring your own energy down, so the capital

these were not saying to the protesters. You don't do this. If you, this I'll kill you! If you do this, you in trouble that would just adjusts ramped things up. the capital place, we're just have a conversation. You know, if you, if you do, this, will will let you do this. You don't do this, but you don't do this completely control their energy. really good in terms of persuasion and police work really really go. Just just train the energy out of it, and but when you see the clip is so clear I mean it could not be more clear that ITALY this group of protesters had nothing on their mind except being heard, nothing else. It wasn't the they weren't trying to hurt anybody that we're trying to take over the capital is completely clear that this group, you have some of the ones who are most famously photograph, had no bad intentions.

now that doesn't say that other people, were as free from bad intentions at all, Tibet, was going through a window and, as tragic Yes, that is, and I know you don't like this. I think it was a good shoot meeting that its she shouldn't have been shops right. Like we all wish, the whole situation have been different, but I think that the the police officer who took that shot has been cleared, and I agree with that. Actually, because if people are coming in with that attitude into the capital. Bring it on themselves. Really I mean I just can't have any. I dont have any more sympathy for Ashley Babbitt being shot than it would for somebody resisting arrest being killed. I care about them on a human level.

but because they saw it was so branded on themselves. I just can't I can make them. I issue really but certainly now- and I guess part of the story is John. Solomon- was reporting that that what we see in the house are going to vote on some kind of nine nine eleven Style Commission to probe the January six, what they call terrorist mob attack the sea just to get an emergency text here. I guess all this right now summaries! Some is really got it.

Problem solve our problems honour the sooner we get going on here, a kind of a slow day. That was what I wanted to talk about today. Does anybody ever the year questions the problem, solver problems. So I don't of you see this, but there there does seem to be more and more the same feeling. Our government is not the right tool for the last part of the pandemic and that the public is going to have to just take The responsibility for ourselves as well as others number one there seem to be some question about the efficacy of the first shot. So there

This question was that the ninety three percent is real or not, and I think we need to wait on that. Ok, apparently did not solve that emergency, such an emergency that I have to stop right now like right now, so I have to end this, but I will talk to you tomorrow.