Well. I've been told that some people miss the simultaneous up because there's some kind of a thirty second, the layers of the net happens. So Let me talk about something else and then we'll do the simultaneous zip. Well. I just got my second shot yesterday, my vaccination Madonna, and how do I feel the next day? Well, I'd like to get the license plate, the truck their ran over me and then backed up over me and then ran over me again and then backed up over me and then ran over me again, because I'm not feeling a hundred percent. Today is the strangest thing, because if you

The simultaneous it was coming by the way, it's the strangest thing, because if you ever told me Scott Workaday schedule specific illness for you, it'll be on this day. Such you watch from about this day. To about this day, you can feel, like you got run over by a truck, welcome to it and there's a weird psychology to this that I wasn't expecting, which is ours weirdly looking forward to it. Did anybody have this experience, because I don't expect that year would have run feeling for today's is gonna kill me. So I know I mean I don't have any legitimate worry about death or something. But I did have a sort of a competitive feeling, a curiosity about how much leave exhalation itself would kick. My ass. I shall like it was a contest and four weeks I've been thinking, bring it up

Brain I will see what my body can do and I dont know how to explain it, but I was weirdly looking forward to the next two days feeling bad and I dont know why that is exactly like I understood that I know something about myself, but I know why you're here you'd like the simultaneous epinal you and if you like, to enjoy it to its maximum potential, and don't you yes, you do you do. I need to cover mugger last thing: you're jealous dive, can't angel, last vessel very fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. The dump me the other day. The thing makes everything better. Everything is called the simultaneous

It's gonna happen now all over the world go. Ah, I feel like I'm coming back. Coming back, very I'm not to read that government, but thank you for it. So Israel. Apparently some researchers have discovered a way to increase the life expectancy of rodents. So they gotta two hundred fifty rodents and they change this protein supply Assad IE six and I guess when they tweak their protein, these these mice, these roads, they don't say Myspace, eroded and so can be checked. We don't know, but these rodents they live much longer.

And I would like to thank science for others. There is one thing that I've thought this world needed more than just about I think- and I was rodents who live much longer so news. Israel has made rodents the list, the possibility that rodents can live longer away. more to the story. Oh, this is good news. They think they might be able to apply this to human someday, you right I was a story that make Europeans live longer, but apparently this is more about people if you're really interpreted correctly, so others is protein than they think they might be. Holding in three years, they might be only gives give you a pill. That'll make. You live twenty percent longer.

They believe that here's, what are the advantages of being my age, if you happen to be a young person watching this, you might you said yourself, wow researchers found a way to extend life by twenty percent. That must be pretty good if you're, my age, you say this way, The two hundred and seventy six story exactly like this one. So are the all the other stories turned out to be bullshit or never gamer came about, but this was real o. This was real. Maybe. maybe every every day that goes by we're probably closer to a day when there is a real one so or at least closer than we were to having something.

Is this the one is this one, this real, the one that really extends our lifetime And all the other ones were fake me be here's a trick for spotting fake news doesn't work. Every time works very often, not every type, and it goes like this. There are categories of things which, if anything, pops up in that category You can just discount it all right. For example, let's say somebody says I was abducted by an alien spaceship. Probed for a vector is unharmed. That is in a category of stories that you don't really need to dig into the details of the specific new one to know. It's not true cuz. It's in that category.

Another category is life extension, so if you see one of these stories its neck category of things that are basically never true so far, but some some some day, one of these will be true. I think I just don't know which one it is. well, there's like IRAN. Dissenters is continuing his march toward the presidency. If he keeps doing things that are this popular with Republicans, I dont know how he could not get nominated less trouble out of trouble. Runs, I think you'll get inhabited, but if Iraq does not run for some reason, dissenters is really set himself up pretty well or maybe from vice president, which would set up for to run for present later, but he is used. Law making illegal to ever transgender athletes playing. How did they word? It.

bans people whose biological sexes listeners mail from participating in women sports from middle School through college. Now what do you think about that? Well, I feel that's halfway right. That's about half right, here's, the half that I don't like. I think Trans Trans athletes should have equal access To sports- and I am not entirely sure that just having biological mail and biological female sports quite meets their needs. I'll? Tell you what word and also would meet lots of other people's needs, so you wouldn't be doing something really special. Just for One population, but you would be doing something that would just work for everyone goes like this, have more coenties, that's it does have more co at times.

And if you're a coward team, it doesn't matter what you identify with it just depends you? What are they good players on equality, while than you in the higher level team. Are you one of the bad players? No matter what your generous! Are you one of the bad play Well, then, you play at the lower coenties. So I have always said that the real problem is that we have teams separated by gender. In the first place now I do understand that we have a tradition that medium some athletes, wind scholarships etc, and so it does make a difference. If you're, biologically female the it could make a difference. They you know you're, not the top athlete on your team. Maybe you don't get a scholarship

Maybe maybe if you are the top after you had so definitely there some edged cases where it's just bad for women who were born biological women. So I dont think you need to take that away from causes always cruel to take something away from somebody. Their use to it, so I think we can keep the teams where we have, I think, run dissenters. Making. This change protects one group at the expense of another. That's the way it always works, but I do think the transgender athletes should have more opportunity to play just maybe go at times. Almost all professional sports do not have a gender requirement. It just folds out that way. So I think we can protect people and also make more opportunities for everybody. So maybe we can make a win win here. I got a question for you

tried to decide if these all these states that are doing voting day, changes or just voting changes. how many of them are just good hygiene for an election meeting that you don't want that rule, because it just makes a safer any kind of fraud. So happily the rules are really just common sense, making things better the rules are cleverly designed to target one group to suppress the vote. One example that was given of that letter kind, the kind there might be a desire to really prohibit black voting is, is the thinking here and I don't I forget which state it, but there's only one state that has a is proposing

as a Sunday prohibition on voting before eleven a am m? And I said to myself: why is that even being talked about likewise that even the thing what would be the problem with voting before eleven a m, have you ever have it. We change it now. The thinking that that I've been told yet is it there's a church relationship In other words of apparently there's a long tradition of black voters going to church and then using sort of thee,

the peer pressure or justly energy from church to go immediately to vote. And presumably, if you take that church energy and transform it into votes, he probably get more. Voters probably get more voters right. So what happens? If you change lap and say now, you can vote before eleven a m. Does it target black voters? Does it I'd say? Yes? Yes, if in fact it's true that black churches have this tradition Maybe wagers doubt I don't know if they do, they don't, but let's say that the people who made the rule were aware of that and they knew that it would make a difference of who voted doesn't matter. Does it matter

But let me ask you this so here's years a story just to give you some context. Imagine if you will that there were some rules in place that made it more likely for white people to learn what the rule would be, but something that just makes white people more likely, And it doesn't rule change and then suddenly say this also has maybe some risk to it. So is change it so. Now why people don't have as many opportunities to vote in that narrow way they got changed, but they can still vote just like everybody else. what do you say? White people were targeted when it. Because I don't believe that any kind of voting changes that don't target people. Wouldn't it be true that every change to the voting system targets a group. probably probably there's nothing. You can change. Even if Europe

say randomly I'll just region. Some rule that I randomly change it I feel like it would somebody, even if you didn't intend it so here's the question, suppose there's one group who has a set of rules that actually work really well for them, such as voting in the morning after church. Is it wrong to take that away because it was a special privilege. Wasn't it we'll privileges wrong word? It was more. I don't even want to say a combination. Exactly the right word is, but. a set of laws, the favoured a group? It would be a. Allowing voting in the morning on Sunday would allow and maybe favour more black votes. Is that good or bad? You should be neither.

It should be neither because all of our voting laws favor or don't favor somebody, and so I don't know- should, should one group have a special advantage. You know what we're all in favor of making the easy to vote, and certainly allowing people to vote on Sunday morning would make it easier. Right, we all agree that makes it easier. So why would you make something less easy while there might be a reason. I heard someone say it was hired to get people to harder to get people to work the Poles on Sunday morning, but I believe that there will always be enough people. The boss, I always so this is an open question. Few wizard. If everybody knows the answer

is there any legitimate reason for changing the time of voting on Sunday morning, legitimate meaning something about reducing fraud or even expense? I guess, but if not, then it doesn't look like it just targeted like you, I don't know how you could interpret it any other way, but I like here the other argument and for some reason I haven't, if there is one maybe there is none CNN says that three out of four people in some kind of Bhopal For people believe that are better at spotting, fake news and they really are and their report Republicans are the worst, the worst that believing fake news. So when you think of this story,

Cnn tells you, the Republicans, are the worst believing fake news is s real moves, because I think it might be fake news about fake news. I think they gave you the rare. Fake news, fake news. Now we don't see fake news, fake news, often usually just fake news, but this is actually fake news about fake news and this kind of brilliant. So let's dig into this element. here's my question in order to know if somebody is good or bad and identifying fake news, how do you determine that? Logically, how can you determine if any of us are good or bad believing were being will take

by fake news. Well, logically, the only way you can do it is to present a test and have people answer the test And then you can see how many faintness things they believed you does. This person believe more fake news than this person That's the only way you could do it right, any other way you could now, if some group is better at identifying it other than just to give them a test. Now here's the question who grades the test and who makes the test, for example, was the Charlottesville fine people hoax The test, because I'll bet it wasn't was the Say the hopes that President Trump suggested drinking bleach further eroded?

Was that on the test? See then was it? Was it I'll bet that was right there on the test? Was that, of course not, of course not. Did the test say? Do you believe that Russia helped Trump get elected? Was the right answer? Is the right answer? Yes or the right answer now. The beauty of this fake news about fake news from see them diabolical like so much now that I've actually asked actually compliment. this is so weasel tactic is one of the core, things I've ever seen in the weasel category now keep in mind I am also somebody using stories about serial killers and often, I think, to myself well that person is really well organised, there's a serial killer who puts a work into it, and appreciate our work. I don't like the serial killer totally.

lab. But if our being fair, the serial killers very industrious and seems to have his act together in terms of engineering, Been planning so see you, then I compliment you on this fake news about fake news and if you could get people to believe that there is some source in the world, that knows which news is fake. and they granted these tests good for you, because ass, the most ridiculous fucking thing I've ever Life there is no way to see it has access to somebody who can tell what the fake news is. Do you know how I know that, because if such a person existed, I think they would get invited on tv to talk about all the faint news. When that every time there is a new fake news or question about whether something real, wouldn't you invite that I pathetically person who is so well informed

the day, I'm alone among the humans can tell which news is fake, they should be on tv lots. Do you think get to get that punted on tv or somebody who knows? That was what the fake news is, but of course, such a person does not exist. The sea, and I would like you to believe it so Biden I guess was talking- was the entails. A talking about the Tulsa Lemme Massacre. So called Black Wall Street Parently was a very prosperous area. Black people were doing great historically speaking,. And there was this horrendous slaughter. Three hundred people died a just because they were black and prosperous, apparently, and the waste just pack them and killed a bunch of people and destroyed their barrier, the city. Now, here's what bothers me the most about this story.

Beyond the fact that the story itself is is a horror but beyond the story, why didn't I know this? How many of you do this like? Really? Why didn't? I know this already cuz, I didn't know this. I consider myself a historian by any means, but I feel, like I at least know which big stories exist right, I feel as though you know, maybe I don't know the details of the dusky, the tests or whatever, but I know it exists. How many of you look here covers something a number of you, so yes, that you didn't know another. You said that you didn't Yeah neck, like Greece, as it was a shock, that's how I took it, because there are some stories that are so horrible. You rhythm and use it and you bring your brain almost, cannot accept them.

May I read the story and I thought I thought I'd heard everything bad that there could be, but does like evil level that I was unaware of and I feel like it was useful. So I'm gonna give Joe Biden a compliment, because I do think you know it's one thing to interpret your history and in a specific way for integration. etc, but is another thing not even know it do not even know the history. This was really really important in terms of understanding the history of race relations in this country. This was big and I a blind spot to it. I was completely unaware, and so I say Joe Biden and your administration, you did a good job on this educating the country, I don't know their leading it, but dailies participated in by here's. My concern

And one of things by the said during a speech there and tell us it, was there tat, from waste supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland. Today, now it looks like it might have been the most lethal threat to the homeland back when they Tulsa Massacre happened now want to bet a pretty strong argument. I think, But today, who would want Joe Biden to say this when the world would be the happiest day here, Joe Biden say: terrorism from waste supremacy is the most lethal threat to the homeland. Today, who would be the happiest people in the world? To here Joe Biden say that China Now, of course, there are concerns, no no proof, but certainly concerns.

The Joe Biden by be beholden to China, because some people speculate that China has some secrets about Hunter by. now. I dont have any evidence that that's the case, but it's. Widely people have a concern about it, because it's not impossible. And I would say it's: maybe fifty percent possible, I mean it's pretty high likelihood- is not impossible by any means and. Is it a coincidence that job says something this ridiculous, because it's ridiculous zone may disagree with that that the statement that terrorism from way supremacy is the most lethal threat the homeland does

But I believe that's true there if you actually made a list of all the risks and how many people might die from each risk that that the risk from from this would be higher than the risk of nuclear war with China higher than the risk of fifty to seventy thousand people a year, the chinese Kelly with Sentinel higher than the risk that they're doing their higher than the risk that there may be experimenting with viruses in an unsafe lab I mean I don't know if that's true but they're, pretty big risks so to say something so blatantly untrue. That is just ridiculous. Who would have caused Joe Biden to say this did Joe by look at the world. He surveyed all the risks and then just started.

only said you know, I've looked him, told the risks and world the up. I feel pretty confident that the biggest one is away supremacists did that happened, because I don't think you did. I think that he is being influenced by the Democrats to say something that me may be good for the next election, because he wants the Republicans to look like the waste, Right, so is it is it just politics, do you believe that binding is such a political, animal and, of course, for all political levels. But this is such a political animal that he would say something this.

Lately absurd and just do a for political reasons, because it doesn't look like it. It looks exactly like China made him say it like they had their head right up his ass all the way up to his mouth, and they were just going to say, says not us say it's, not China don't mention China, no problem with China. It's why supremacy That's your biggest problem ignore China. I don't know to me. It looks obvious that this is foreign influence and, if it's not, which is a possibility, of course, if it's not foreign influence. You have this problem of the appearance of it. Do you wanna President, who appears to be favouring your greatest rival, because he appears to this statement appears to be chinese. Propaganda doesn't mean it is, but sure looks exactly like it and the? U gotta worry

that are actually also story and wishes one little now get in there. They said the two and five white independence safe. Policies, including affirmative action, discriminate unfairly against white people two and five way. People say that only to what. Are you telling me that if you could gather five white people together, who identified as independents and just put them in the room with me- and I said you know- I've been fired well, essentially indirectly fired twice explicitly because of white and male. You know that's happened right and you do know that big corporations directly discriminate against white people because they need to

Their diversity, which is a good goal- I don't have any any concern about the worthiness of having more diversity in your company. I think that just make sense and diverse country, but how do you aren't you? It's not discriminating against white people. You can certainly discriminate. That is good for the world. You can certainly say well it does discriminate against white people, but in the long run its better. I get it.

It would add- or I could disagree with that, but it's not absurd. Do you not absurd that white independence only two and five of them think that is discrimination against white people. It's exactly discrimination against white people is not slightly discrimination against white people is not reminding you of discrimination of white people in an analogy kind of way. It's not accidentally discriminating against white people, its direct intentional, huge boo under throat discrimination against white people for a good purpose. I mean there's a there's, a genuinely good purpose to it, which is you some kind of racial balance, some kind of income balance.

At least trying to get. It is probably healthy for society. Even if you don't get there always trying to get there, you don't make an effort. It does make us maybe a little bit better to live together, so I'm not gonna say there's no benefit to it. It just as in the benefit to the white people who lost their jobs at the care. We say can we say it's very bad for the white person who lost their job, but if you're making an argument is better for society. I'll, listen to the argument. You know I may disagree with it, but I was totally listen to that argument is not absurd. So. There's that big story today is the FAO Chee emails. I guess who's some freedom of information action. I've got us a bunch of these emails now our dig it in to find out just a really was behind the curtain. How bad was it now that we know what faulty actually was thinking and when he was thinking? What.

thinking from these emails, my god we found some things and let me tell you the whole As we have found as as described. with by CNN, so CNN Doug into these and well, you think, there's a bomb shells in their air. Here's a couple, the Bob shells the CNN found this is just draw dropping. I listen to the reporting summarizing it so perfectly, but these the CNN says the doktor fetch. You worked so hard during the pandemic that often he was exhausted. Yet, despite being exhausted, he was always polite in answering his Emil's yeah. That's what we learn and what else do we learn from CNN about the emails or that will that's it actually, so that very much covered it so

the things you need to know about the emails, Gordon this them without you worked very hard, and yet he was always polite. He was always played. There is also information update that he is kind bets, he's very kind to pets and he doesn't need a lot of sugar he's punctual and he doesn't talk behind people's back. And I believe that you never forgets an anniversary. These are some of the important things were learning about. Doktor fetch you from CNN, and I think this is totally unbiased. So you leave it see. If anybody had competing opinion, anybody see While on the internet, there is a mixture of

Who, as you know, is the internets dad is changed as a twitter profile, but it does say internet dad or data the internet, which is wholly Andrew and Bike Service says us. He said there the Washington Post, dishonest spin of the FAO Gmos to what the emails show and MIKE says. thought, you knew about the levelling possibility covered up from day one. Now, I'm sorry, I think I'm reading my own, my own quarter by away the point is that something didn't print out here, but the point is that the opinions on these emails range from there's nothing there all the way to we got the smoking gun we found out the FAO she's been lying to us the whole.

So I looked at the coverage to try to find the lies. I didn't really find any so I guess you think there was something in there this about Michelle, but why did I see any. So, for example, some things he said was earlier, They said they didn't think masks. They you bought at the drugstore would help you from receiving the virus, but it might help you if you had the virus like keep some of the spittle in closer to your face. Now my memory is: that's exactly what they said public. Do you remember it differently? My memory is, he said exactly that in So I don't know that told me anything about the allegation that he always knew. It was a possibility.

You Hon LAB was the source of the lake, because their email suggest that he knows at least the possibility. Didn't he always ate it. Maybe I will think he ever ruled it down to the end anybody who doesn't think it's a waste of possibility at all the differences between what the emails say and what he said in public. Maybe you could find a little difference, but Nothing. I can say that makes any difference so anyway, there's more of a story there that are missing somebody filled in, but it looked to me like a non story Taiwan is having a big spiking krona virus. Despite be one of the

spite being one of the success stories now we all thought that maybe tat one was a success story, because our island at least I thought that, because it's easier to close off travel, if you're an island, not many people were swimming there. Boating there. I suppose travellers mostly by airplane, but I guess one thinks that Taiwan got right as they closed travel from China and I didn't even though they had trouble, which I know so that's what I knew maybe early, and maybe there made a difference, but they ve got a spike.

So remember what I told you earlier in the pandemic. So I'm really a comment from says she go. He absolutely did rule it out. Show me they're quote showing their quote, because I think we're we're dealing from memory and I'll bet. If you looked at whatever felt she said about the lab lake, he probably said something like this. There is no evidence that happened. Check me on that to effect check. If what he said is there's no evidence of it. That's completely compatible with saying well everything's possible. There's, there's no difference. so. Finally, exactly what you said that you believe contradicts the email and then tweeted at me, Because I'm not saying that there is another humor,

I'm saying I looked, I spent some time. I looked for all the Bob shells. I just don't see any, but but if you saw some, let me now, I dont think is weasel words to say we have no evidence for something filled with us with the words. But anyway, I think some of you think I'm misinformed, and I want you to clear that up for me in I'm not wedded to my opinion on this, so I am happy to change my opinion decision could be some some data to do that. Oh, do you remember. I told you earlier in the pandemic, when Trump was getting lots of. of heat for not doing things. The way people thought he should do them

said to you. You need to wait till the end, because, if you judging who won the game in the second ending you're, probably not that accurate, and that we might make some mistakes in the United States early, but we might be kind of spectacular by the time we get rolling. What happened the United States may be made some. eggs in the beginning. I don't know you know we could debate that all day long, but we certainly had more deaths than other countries. So, if you just based on the desk infection, we did poorly in the beginning, what we did was vaccinations. We, the United States, collectively from the companies that made them to the government that fast track them. Thank you, Trump Administration to the implementation of which is, frankly, just amazing.

the fact that we rolled the mountain produce them and got them in arms. So quickly is just amazing, and I said at the beginning that if you judge the United States pandemic response by by the early days is not fair, you can have a look at the whole game. And I said in the beginning that when you are all done and you'd look at the whole game, the United States would look good, not maybe the best. World or something but among nations. I think we're gonna be one of the top five. Maybe I think the United States will end in the top five of of countries they handled it.

right in the end? Now that doesn't mean we didn't bungle a bunch of stuff in the fog of war? Let's just you presume is presumed to happen, and it doesn't mean that the people who got it right early on in the pandemic, if they did, it, doesn't mean that there were this geniuses. Does everybody was coming to guessing in the you know, somebody who's, gonna, guess right new. Seventy was gonna, guess wrong. I didn't mean that one of them was incompetent. It was just guessing in the beginning.

I mean educated guesses, but their guesses, and but over the course of a year and a half or whatever it's gonna be. You could understand the true capability of these different countries. At the end of eighty months, leadership is going to matter right. Execution is going to matter- maybe not the first few months, because you just guessing poorly executing and trying things and seeing what works, but by the time we get to the end you ve, rapidly tested in rule things in and out in your ear, your employees should be where you judge I feel that the United States has this warning superpower that I don't know anybody will ever be able to match, which is we're just maniacs this country, where frickin maniacs, when one problem comes our away like what will jump on a problem like like starving

a ham sandwich right like we love attacking problems in this country, were a whole country of problem. Solvers like that, I think I think this is vaguely racist who say it anyway. I do think that the way this country was created and continues to be creating itself is that we have this weird filter and the filter is: do you have the balls together, fucking ship and sail all the way across the ocean just to be an American, the other balls to do that? Are you Bob? Do you have water tanks? Can you take a take a risk for a better world when we got all those people- and I know this is unpopular to say with this particular crowd, but the one that didn't benefit, I would say, of illegal immigration, not all of it all of it.

You get your criminal elements come in, but I have always said if all we do is attract the people who have the highest tolerance for economic risk, meaning that they will walk across the desert to get in job. I want all, while all now, of course, you can't just let everybody at right. You have to have controls on the on the border, but if we could only get the people with such gigantic balls that they were all there will go across the ocean, they walk across the desert, they will kill to be Americans, you gonna get some good Americans and that bunch you still get a bunch of

people were neutral neutrality to get a bunch of people were criminals. Any big group, but then that is such a good filter does anybody else have that is ready? Other country there has, as their filter, give us your best people. Now, when I say best, I don't mean the most educated. Right, I don't mean anything else. Just their attitude bring me boatloads of people with that attitude. That's a country! I live just we're just showing it with people who are that kind of person. No other country has it, and I think that that gives us an advantage is system advantage that is enduring seems to be so. Anyway, to one's guess: misuse with the chroniclers here's a story where I can't even imagine how this mystery could be solved but apparent

the arabian navies largest warship, that's a warship but mostly is used for supplying the other smaller ships, I guess, but their largest. worship caught on fire and sank Wednesday in the gulf of among and its call them unclear circumstances and it sort of the mystery. See if we can solve the mystery ha. Is there anything happening in the Middle EAST, which would suggest a hypothesis that maybe we could dig into a little bit them to clear up? Some of this unclear circumstances. well. For one thing, we ever Joe Biden Administration getting friendly with ran. At the same time. Let me.

Who is saying this won't stop us from attacking around, because you basically just making it more dangerous for Israel and you're, making more likely we're going to attack. So, given that that sort of an obvious point, that is Oh go it alone and clearly attack arabian assets is war. Basically, so the fact that the United States is not going to back Israel, And go hard at ran, negotiating lies and sanction lies. That phrase Israel right as long as the United States is being productive, arrive, had zero side effects from the second shot. as long as the United States is being a productive player or tried to be were setting itself up, as one

The whole Israel around the situation as long as we're in there. Israel has to restrain himself right. so is adding a better world or worse world. Suppose Trump made it harder for Israel to attack. I don't have. That was the case. Maybe the Evans suggest not but I wonder if binding is playing this exactly right while making it look exactly wrong. On the surface, I would say by this approach, looks completely because it looks like he's just in balding ran, and I don't I can't imagine anything good can come out of that right. But what is the real play is to get the United States off the hook. make it look like we're a little bit more pro palestinian and indirectly pro Hamas

Maybe we actually are and Israel now being unconstrained, because the United States is on its side in the same way, can they just attacked them without any recourse The by the administration would say: hey, don't do that again, you use galley wags. Why are you attacking around you shouldn't? Do that? I feel as if this is intentional, to give Israel the green light to do whatever the hell they want, while making it less likely that the United States, This attack them homeland and if Israel did attack, I feel like we might help a little, but under the covers, if only for intelligence. Whatever I am being asked, didn't Israel S the USA to stay away. I don't recall that I always thought that the? U S was welcome

Negotiations- but I could be wrong about that so cleared up for me. If I'm wrong about that. Meanwhile, More unclear circumstances, for example. Do you know the binding is going to be talking to Putin pretty soon in what they're calling a summit and here's a here's a coincidence. Russian cyber gangs are hacking into pipelines in the United States. In one case, and now we meet packing plant They'll have a big impact on meat production and potent saying hey. That's that's criminal elements, s not me, I'm not behind that. Sort of an unclear circumstance, I believe, suddenly The states are saying: hey, hey, I think, you're doing this intentional to harm the United States and prudent saying Bobby, not me it's an unclear circumstance. Does we don't know how this is happening should certainly not be

Well, what do the professional say so the professional say, apparently the chromium, the Kremlin. to the warning earlier this week, that quote uncomfortable signals would be sent to the? U S head of the summit later this month. What the Kremlin specifically warn that there would be some uncomfortable things coming our way and sure enough. Uncomfortable things came our way, this evil associated with Russia, but no they're not behind these are just criminal elements

They have nothing, they can do about it, and I guess Russia's Deputy Foreign Minister said this. These said quote: the Americans must assume that a number of signals from Moscow will be uncomfortable for them, including in the coming days when they actually take the they they pointed to the fence before they hit the ball over it and. Apparently, there's Sesar Rebecca cover she's, a former defence intelligence agents, agency person, intelligence, personas, Russia and she said that poor display book Russia's secret plan to defeat America. She told Fox NEWS

They use criminal gangs and cut is a carbon tactic way? What so our intelligence agency already knows the Putin plans he plans to do it to use criminal groups. to give deniability for Russia, and then Russia says we're gonna sell you some signals and they say what it's going to happen, and then hackers attack us or attack things that affect us. Is this is obvious, as it looks because it feels a little bit too on the nose? Is there something wrong with this story, because I don't think you could be more clear that Russia is doing this and basically attacking us and we're going to just act like it or not?

Is our binds administration is doing, just pretending is now happening, or are they doing something behind the curtain that we don't know about? It could be that we're heading Russia hard. We, the public, just don't know it. Maybe maybe Biden would think that's a better deal but, as in Bremmer, pointed out the people who voted for by didn't because they thought he would go harder on Russia, Are now discovering that he is going softer on Russia, so if that was one of your reasons for supporting button, you did not get what you thought. You were voting for. Erasmus is reporting that the Astor Nepal have American relations got better or worse under Biden. Fifteen percent, one five think that relations with America and Israel have got better by forty five percent say worse.

fifty seven percent of liberals, believe it's about the same to which I say they watching the news, all Sparky ass. If the russian hacking was false, leg stuff could be. Could be falsely, but why would Russia tell us in advance that they were going to do something. I feel as though they are telling us that they can t say it wasn't So here's what I wonder

when the world do. Fifteen percent people think that relations between America, Israel, got better during by a hundred percent of the news stories suggest that relationships got worse. Oliver, I dont believe there's one story in the news this, as you know, what binds doing it's, making Israel really love United States now, one I dont believe, there's even one and you have fifty percent say eyes, get better because job. I thank God for Joe Button. Well, Laura Grim had under show last night and fox an expert who says that there is a new study showing that Hydroxyl we works and that the reason we didn't know it worked until Now- and this was I guess, the study was on hospitalized people, so people were badly.

Sarah, apparently, if you give them a high enough dose, it works like really well, but if you don't give them a high enough dose. Gentlemen difference like every other medicine. Recently, so the fact that this is only being reported on Lord Ingram Show and only on Fox NEWS, as seems to be this one doktor and Isabel hijacks Chloric. We let me ask you, is Suddenly, category of stories remember what I told you you can judge things by their category. Is this in the category of stories that are likely to be true, meaning that I just

going really did work really well all long, and we just now it is that likely to be too well it's in the category of things that are unlikely to be true, because when you see one entity make a claim like this, but the other entities are quiet. It's either the biggest conspiracy in the world or the one entity was talking about it.

There is concern out, not be correct, so I'm not willing to say this is incorrect, have no evidence to debunk in any way. But beware: it's in the category of things that are almost never write like almost never just by its category doesn't mean this was wrong and I'm not gonna suggested is because I've sets I've said way too often and from the beginning that there was this weird coincidence that all of the high drugs clerk mean studies apparently intentionally studied the wrong thing. You ve heard me say it

So I have said many times that I cannot understand why they seem to be intentionally studying the wrong thing, because we know how it should be used or what the recommended protocol was, but that's not what they tested. They were test other things or they test a group, this too small or they test somebody who's already critically ill and don't test enough of it. But basically none of the test looked like actual task So could it be that this has worked all along yes as possible, but is in the category things at usually? Aren't you just beware that right he.

I guess I talked about this other stuff already. If you're adjoining late gave you an update, I did you get my second Madonna vaccination Shut yesterday. I did wake up this morning wishing that this arm was no longer with me as I get out of it. I did feel body body ache, I would say nothing. Probably that will stop me from doing everything I was gonna. Do today. so immediately after getting the shot, I did for work out, arms, arms back and stuff didn't bother me at all. So he says I gotta too didn't sleep while I was on the border of not sleeping well, but it didn't stop me. It was nice now you.

Also this going skiff their second but dirty shot. I thought about it, I did think about. Maybe if I, if I were younger, I would skip the second one. Maybe, and thus Just as you do, I feel like. If the first one didn't kill you the second one probably won't, but I know that doesn't make sense see. I saw Brett Wednesday in question there we will put book. I so bread to Wednesday has a part Gaston It just begin to listen to and which he's talking about I've Rebecca ends, and the story is very similar to that drugs chloroprene story, which is that there are some people who say the the evidence clearly says I remarked and works. There are other people who say clearly it doesn't, but when you see somebody that's qualified and Brett would be that category. Somebody

you look a little bit deeper into the science of you and I can add, the somebody on the show was just impeccable credentials and seems to have a strong opinion that works. Think you have to start paying attention to that. You have to start paying attention. Now. Is the ivory makin story in the category of stories they usually turned out to be false. Yes, yes, it's in the category of things that usually are not true, and I mean usually like ninety plus percent, but. How often do you have somebody with these credentials stepping up and putting their reputations on the line? And the answer is not that often not that often because these are some serious

People saying you need to take this seriously, so I would say when you add that factor of the people involved, then it's not in that category anymore, that that's what would remove it from the category of things that are wrong. Ninety percent of the time I feel, like I'm good, upgrade this one to a fifty. Fifty now again, you and I dont know. We were not really qualified to now, but I'd say when from I've Rebecca and when, in my mind from ninety percent chance, there's nothing there too. Maybe fifty percent chance. There is something, and I could go further than that because it still is adjacent to their category. Things usually is wrong, so I don't wanna get excited about it, but could be could be. Maybe good news Brett Wednesday is risking cancellation to tell the truth.

He really is, I was listening to the first part of his body. Guess we're has tried to deal with the cancellation threat and he did a very well by by not claiming something that wasn't supported and showing that the qualifications of his experts and the qualifications of the research, I assume, were strong enough that he should not be cancelled. Just talking about will say we'll see, I think, there's gotta be quite a reckoning with the platforms and with the news after we know was true and what is and is here's my question, let me ask you this: let's say hypothetically some day: seventy finds out that Hydroxyl clerk. We absolutely.

definitely work. What is that happened? Would you say? Oh my god, Trump was right and everybody else was wrong and therefore you should give credit to Trump for being right. Is that how you would interpret it or or would you say there was something unique about Trump, which made people not even use a medicine that would save a million lives? If that's true troposphere problem right there, you so divisive the even something that clearly work people wouldn't even take a life saving drugs or let other people take it, because it would allow trunk to be right.

So there are two stories year, one in which trop as the hero, because he was right along now. This makes it the substance is not an evidence, yet the Jackson, Chloroprene actually works. So I'd say that's not proven. There's just some recent evidence suggesting might so that that's my dick, so you you could make a story, the trumpets either the villain or the euro, and that story and the evidence would support both. I think.

the sea. Imagine actually believing that the manufacture story round Trump is trumps fault, you're, smarter than that's got. Well, I I always black people, say you're smarter than that, because that's just a deck thing to say so I do on this channel, but I don't think you can. I don't think you can hold trump harmless from the fact that he intentionally is provocative because being intentionally provocative.

exactly what allowed him to win out. We won the first election, but if being intentionally provocative has a cost associated with that, which is that the predictable outcome is that people won't believe him when he's right right, people won't believe it when he is right little, that is on Job Europe, because we do know that, even if you support Europe, you do know that he didn't pass the fact acting fairly frequently. Now I've often said it matter either does is just hyper Billy. You know. Most of the vaccine is vague anyway, and is just hyperbole these directly correct that I still think that's all true, but maybe I think we should be open to the possibility that, if you are, if you're, using these techniques to begin,

president, don't be surprised if people don't believe you wanna medical question, no be surprised. That should be the fairly predictable outcome of that. So I have often said that Trump is what I call and expensive president or was meaning that he can get you things that you couldn't get from anybody else, North Korea being best example so eager to do stuff than other people couldn't do, but he's gonna be expensive, and maybe this is what it expenses, YO hypothetically, so that's all I got for now. I will talk to you