Ok, everybody it's time it's time for coffee was got atoms, and I think you know that's the best part of the day Sometimes you say to yourself: hey, I think this part of the day is a little bit better than no. Now you catch yourself. Tell you just catch yourself. He said now, it's not better than coffee was got items that that does not make sense in what world Could that be true? And if you'd like to take it up a level to see what is all about because a lot of you are just lurkers and you don't do the simultaneous happen. You're thinking see what this is all about. Understand it, but if you did the simultaneous zip you'd be blog, then you get them. And all you need is a couple of my glass Glossop tanker jealousies, jealous of Jogerfy, ask a vessel of any kind.

follow the very like I like coffee and join me now the unparalleled pleasure, the dope vein the other day. The thing that makes everything better skull. The simultaneous happen is gonna happen right now. Go. Silken, yes, we ve got lurkers and we ve got slippers, as is pointed out in the comments know which one you are the biggest labour, not a worker. That's a bumper sticker. We can all I believe- and I am going to add a couple of flags for a cognitive dissonance. As you know, I've told you things that people say that they can we say when their experiencing cognitive, dissonance and so exam

I've told you before it when somebody starts a sentence with so you're saying that snow is made of metal. You probably never said snow is made of metal. Is that so you're saying it's always a tip off. The sum is starting to elucidate There is another one I saw today on Twitter. You see the two various forms in various places- and it goes like this quote- the data is very clear Now I will allow that there are situations in which the data is very clear. Does. He's ingress cause lung cancer. Yes, the data is very clear, but there are some situations in which the phrase the data is very clear, is nothing but a big old signal. They you're having a mental breakdown. You may not know

but your hallucinating? So if you're talking about the pandemic- and you talking about any data about anything, the effectiveness of vaccinations, the risk of the vaccination itself than vastly the rates of infection, the testing, In any event, if you're willing to look into that big old mass and say the data is very clear, I'm sorry! Yes, you pedantic mother fucker. The data are very clear. Yes, data data is plural, so the data are very clear. So all of you but motherfuckers you're right,

you're right. But may I make a plea from those of us in the writer author, a class which I put myself in you know, things become common usage is because people I mean. Make them common usage. If you don't have a professional writer who is willing to write something that isn't quite perfect grammar, it's never gonna become common usage. It'll just be incorrect speech until somebody like me. Endorses it, so I I hereby endorse the data is, and now it enters common usage, that's a power that you don't have because you're, not a famous author. but if you are a famous other, you could take things which are incorrect. Grammar move them into common usage simply by using them and see if that works.

But anyway, if using today It is very clear on anything in the corona virus world you are, serious cognitive, dissonance. Now here's the fun part, you could be right. In other words, your opinion of whatever is true, be totally right, but if you The reason you're right is cuz. The data is very clear, that's not even thinking there's something else going on some kind of a hallucination. You just joining your tea or something like that, and you could be right by coincidence, but it's not because the day there is very clear that certainly not happening. here's a year.

Tweet. I said yes, it is a reminder that the courts have found no evidence of widespread voter fraud and then twenty twenty election. You all agree, that's true right in the course of now found that. But there is a second reminder, if, if an election system is designed intentionally designed such that you can't complete an audit, Meaning that all the elements that can't be honoured, if you design that that way, you're designing for widespread fraught with anybody, disagree with that statement. If you sign this system- and you know by the nature of your design before even implement that you know, it will be on order trouble. What is what kind of thing if you created, will you ve created something. There's either the intention of being fraud or the inevitable outcome.

So here we have a system that apparently can be audited because we're learning that as there are attempts to do it specifically I'm talking about the electronic part, you can't really ought at some of the things that have been deleted. You care what it these software there was actually running at the time of the election. You just basically can't get into the proprietary stuff of your own election. It's your own election and you can't look at how it was done, because the proprietor. If you design the system that way, you're designing widespread fraud, you only dont. The only thing you don't know is, if it hasn't happened yet because he's gonna happen, you design this system to get that outcome. So

Let's always keep those two things in mind: the courts have found no widespread, no widespread fraud in the election, none they have found no widespread fraud. But it is a system designed to create it. Either already Or fairly soon, there's no way around it really. B or Luxembourg, who is a famous name in the climate change world I don't wanna say he's a sceptic because he believes climate change is real and humans are causing it, but-

He is sceptical of some of the doom projections and he points out that. Did you notice that, even according to the IPCC, the most efficient climate change people that, even according to them, the hurricanes are not getting stronger, or at least they can detect that they are? Did you know that that they care really find that in the data, because you know the data is not very clear- the data it, is not very clear as before, and points out now, maybe someday the eleven. Now I believe that also he said somewhere that something like the death from natural disasters have decreased softly. Like ninety nine percent. This right

the things were most worried about from climate change are things that have happened for natural reasons forever and we're so good at mitigating the risk. I building our air conditioning in learning how to build buildings. Adele fall down an earthquake since. I've hurricanes and all that were at the point where we reduced the risk by ninety nine percent from some historical high. So keep that in mind the data is not very clear. Stock about hunters laptop talk of girls and was going after him again and he said so, are there number of emails and text from Hunter by explaining. How are you is selling access to his father know. Is that true,

I've seen some of the emails, but not all of them. When you conclude that as a true statement, with no ambiguity that binds emails explained how he was selling access to his father. Would you would you say that they say that directly Selling access is sort of hyperbolic. Way to say he was well. He was selling access and others of the US something about ten percent going to the big guy there are really something happening there that appear to be crimes to my non legal mine. They look like crimes me, but what's going on there, like what? Why is it that you weren't a situation where trumpet

illegal jeopardy for something that say employees benefits tax issue? That normally would be a fine and probably not that unusual and corporate Amerika, but a job the hunter by not even not even investigated, raising. brooches, as I often argue that people can't be that double when it comes to crimes in such a third lots of examples where people are that up I'll? Take that so here's the thing what would happen? Let me give you a hypothetical. What would happen if Ex president Trump gets indicted or prosecuted, for

these financial crimes, alleged financial crimes that normally would just be a fine or something like that? What have you got jail ties and what, if Hunter Biden was never even indicted or investigators. I won't load that due to the country, I feel as if the legal system. can give us a result. A it would be too destabilizing so I don't feel as if the legal system has anything to do with these two cases. Do what would you think of me? system will be? Who decides if Trump gets prosecuted? Not really views can be a political process. Even if there's a jury Dogan mean just acting politically and then on to buy,

Things was purely political, so we have these two high profile cases that may or may not be any crimes involved either one. So let me give the let me give the presumption of innocence to both entities. Presumption of innocence to President Trump same same extended two hundred by because we want to live in a country where the presumption of Since the storm meaningful, but I now see that the legal system is going to make any of these decisions, it just looks like the political system will decide who is investigating goes to jail. So there's your country right there. Our endless talk about vaccine misinformation as it's called agenda. Saki talking for the White House, said For the story, of course, there's about twelve people, she says that are produced Sixty five percent of anti vaccine information

they remain active on Facebook or the twelve people. Very curious is Alex Barons and one, the twelve or his takes about considered other the crazy ones, because I think, for example, the claim that the vaccination could make you unable to have children or something. I don't know that somebody like AL experiences ever said anything like that, because I don't think the data suggests that but three I know he's still on east on twitter. But what would it take to get into that category of the twelve people who, by the way, how things should be banned from Facebook? Oh I'm on Facebook, but I dont really use it.

Look at some fairly pictures and stuff- I think Twitter suspended it. I think Alex birds and got maybe temporarily suspended, but he's there today. And I'm just wondering where there are going to draw the line, because I think we would all agree that there are people spreading misinformation above vaccines right. Would anybody disagree that that exists, that it's a thing that no matter what you think to be true about vaccinations? Would you also agree that there are people spreading misinformation zebra, disagree that investors it's the internet, so people are spreading misinformation. What we really need a list of those twelve people as anybody produce that yet who are the twelve because we're talking about it in the abstract- and we should be doing that- I mean it's ok to talk about the abstract, but we have

Elvis specific names? Somebody says it has been published? The list was published and woke over here we go, I'm see somebody post the list. Ok here ago, Youtube. I'm gonna be reading this from a comment overrun. The locals platform subscription platform wakened follow me in other people for a subscription vacant posts, images, the comments, which is a big advantage over Youtube. Some look here. One of the images looks like. Name's Joseph Recall, a Robert have Kennedy, Junior Democrat, ok tie and Charlie Ballinger Sherry ten Betty risen Islam regime?

tar IRAN's Elizabeth Sayer G, J, Ai Kelly, broken her christian Northrop Ben Tapir and Kevin Jenkins right then Tapir interesting, no relation to anybody. We know I'm sure so Some emphasise nope, it's all truth, so I've only heard of a few of those names, and I dont know how much of their information I've seen. I feel like none. I don't feel like I've seen any other tweets. Have you so thank you for

pasty eleven there. That was really awful. I salute all people, I'd love to see what they're saying or what their specific this information is, but I dont know that the internet is gonna, miss any them right now. As I have often said, critics are our national ass it. So I talk about Alex Barons and fairly often because I feel like I disagree with him a lot more than I agree, and yet you need him right. You need you need somebody to do what he's doing, which is to be super skeptical. Everything is you just need that some somebody asked occupy that space right and he does it. So I am glad he's not on the list. Even though I find myself disagree with him more than agree, let's talk about persuasion and how they buy. Didn't industries is due

on the vaccinations. Are you ready to be deeply offended? That's covered up, there's something I do, which I know in advance. Aren't gonna go down well with my audience, but on the other hand it is why you come here, if it hersel little bet. It's probably what you signed up for. Ok,. And here's: what's gonna hurt I'm going to Disagree with what the by the administration is doing, but I'm going to complement them for the leadership of the technique. handle them here. Can you handle that I dont like what they're doing but the mechanism they're using the skill that are using pretty good?

let's talk about that so seriously, director well, and he said- and apparently this is gonna- be sort of their their branding message that this is Show me a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Does that sound familiar to you ever wonder if the Democrats ever watch the communicators that are more associated with the right- and I would say I'm in that category, even though I don't associate myself with the right but in terms of my audience ES Do you remember, I got in trouble for a tweet saying that, if you're vaccinated or if you're on vaccinated you're in the pandemic, but if you're vaccinated it's just Wednesday, remember I did that tweet and it got a lot of attention and I did here, for some people at let's say senior levels, not Democrats, that that we got a lot of attention.

And today I'm saying that the main message coming over them, the by the administration is Ethically, a reworking of that idea that this is a pandemic of the other vaccinate. So I didn't do that intentionally and as I I'll do, and I mean this by the way I'm come deadly serious about this. I am not trying to persuade anybody vaccinations that would be completely unethical, I'm not a doctor, but I certainly can't talk about it. Can't I It is a unethical for me to simply give you my opinion or to tell you that I vaccinated or what set over Rison risks and benefits. I considered because My risks and rewards are not yours, so I can say well thought it made sense from my psychology all things considered, but that's not a recommendation for you.

if you're twenty years old and healthy your situation is mine, you're in a different state. Your situation doesn't mind, so don't take my example. As persuasion, but I am also aware of the fact that as an effect, but does not intentional seriously is not intentional it were. I would consider a deeply unethical and inappropriate on every level if I were trying to influence you on a medical decision. That's way beyond my my expertise. So you can look at my decisions and you can say with what you like about this ever make their own decisions, but we could also talk about what's true and try to figure that out. I'm not gonna get right every time right now, you're live streaming host? Who gets everything right? But rustling whether I think has some value, I would feel that.

But I am. I am aware that I influence accidently. So here's a question: do you think I influences? Do you think that the Democrats are smart enough to at least watch the messaging coming from people were trained to do this stuff because, if they're not watching me by now the sort of missing a big opportunity. because I at least explain things in a way that would help them create better strategies YO, even if they disagreed with everything it was. They'll be useful for them to see I frame stuff. So probably. and I'm going to say it is more likely to be an accident than an influence. But I compliment it is really good framework

So can he handle this? If you handled me complimenting technique, but was still thinking, maybe maybe they shouldn't be forcing people to get vaccinated? You all good with that. We do that. I'm sure we can handle that all right, is really gonna kill you Joe Biden, is showing impressive leadership on the vaccination stuff.

Oh, don't sign off yet there's more to say it's just true now do you want to be led to get the vaccination of that's a separate question, the question of whether you should be vaccinated or anybody individually should be. That's a separate question just hold that for a second right, we'll talk about that separately, but is he? Is he showing leadership? The answer is yes. I am not not the big Joe Biden fan I don't think, there's capabilities are anywhere near what we need for our present, but let's less define leadership. Is leadership telling people to eat cookies when they were already hungry and they love cookies. Now now telling people, cookies when their hungry and they really enjoy even cuttings

is not. Leadership has just doing what they want to do. How about people too? go to war when you, No there's some of those people, specifically the people in the battles we'll get killed, but is bad for those people who get killed and wounded and the families etc, but the idea that it might be good for the greater use of national interest that leadership. Yes, yes, leadership is Tele individuals, I've decided, you're, gonna, get killed for the greater good That's leadership right! Otherwise, you just telling people what they want to hear and that's that could be lots of other things was not leadership. Leadership.

Is getting you to do something you really don't wanna fuck and do because you think is good for the whole. Now is that true is a good, for, though, is a good for the whole if everybody go vaccinated, reasonable People could disagree right. I'm not even gonna. Have that conversation today. Reasonable people disagree on that, and so that's why the leadership leadership, The Thai breaker leadership, as is the one who says yeah. That's a reasonable view. and the other side is a reasonable view. We're gonna do one of those two things and, the people with the other is view. Well, you screwed were I'm going to push this through s leadership. so you can certainly argue. I won't give any pushed back to this that is leading us in the wrong direction. Right.

and certainly you could argue- and I'm not saying that I'm just saying you can argue that very easily and secondly, it could be terrible for you individually, right, very much like being drafted and being settled, to war. Maybe a war, you don't even a great with maybe Vietnam when that be terrible. For the individual, the patriot who went over their joined, the military was trying to do something good and the end up in Vietnam. Doing maybe nothingness useful, that's your ship. What have I often sent about leadership? Does anybody know what I have often said about leadership? Its evil is evil leadership, even if you need it, and even if it's good for the country and the general

Its evil, because it makes you do something you don't wanna, do it makes some people. go off and die who we're gonna die. Otherwise is pure evil. It's also why I can't do it lot of people asking: why don't you run for office scarp you're such a acrylic? What are you run for office? and the reason that I'm not a ceo reason. That would be a good one. Why ever ceo of my own corporation, I guess but I'll, manage a large group of people and I dont want to run for office, because I can't do evil things. Just hard for me to do evil things and leadership is evil, Kishar choosing who dies for the greater good There is an argument for it, but you still choose new dies and I- and I like signing up for that personally-

I would say the button when he said the Facebook about Facebook there are killing people. I'm sorry I like it protect meek. Only for technique does mean is true, does mean you should take a vaccination just technique. He says a direct he says it simply, and he says it with authority. It's really good persuasion wise, but again make your own decision about whether he should be persuaded them at all. This won't be the first time that the? U S, government, has brainwash the public on an issue of safety. Is it in the comments? I want to see how many examples you can come up with, where the? U S, government,

we just limited? U S, to keep it simple, where the? U S, government, brainwashed its citizens for something you said was good for them and see the war on drugs. I see helmets. Patriot act, war on terror, japanese, internment camps, unjust, raining. What's going on the food pyramid, Swine Flu gun control, low fat, staff, sugar, drinking water, quality, fluoride, Emma's, cheesy belts, littering lecture cars, war on terror, Rat Katy, twice or added water? now I'm not agreeing with all of your comments, meaning that I don't think these are all examples that, but there certainly is some indication here that your government routinely brainwashing you when you say:

could we couldn't? We all agree on the following statement. Some of the examples I don't agree with, but could we agree with the general statements that your government routinely routinely brain washes the public? What do you think the pledge of relations? Is it just brainwashing? Now it happens to be productive, brainwashing that I completely agree with. We should definitely have the pledge of allegiance is good for the country, the sum cohesive unity etc, but his brainwashing, your country brainwash. Is you all the time for Europe I'm good in their opinion, now some of the stuff like weapons of mass destruction, etcetera, we're not in your best interest. But there are plenty of examples where they do brainwash you for your.

best interests. So the problem, I think, is when they get a right, much less so than the problem or whether the doing it, Meanwhile, meanwhile, washing these amateurs reporting that Youtube was finally, hundred thousand euros, which should be about a hundred eighty thousand dollars, a german court for removing a video of a corona virus. Lockdown protest in Switzerland, is the highest on record in Germany, so Germany's laws and U s- laws are very different but interesting. There is at least one country's courts fighting back against. I suppose what they would call censorship and

My notes or Messer early, I go back to the growth of our society, After injectors, did you see Joe Bindings statements when he was with Merkel, Laura Grams show add some clips there were just malaria is one of the cliffs was by didn't To form a sentence- and they just kept going in adding words, but it wasn't make any sense of finally, just sort of certain gave up for just a bunch of Babel words in the end I you like, maybe you could tease out some meaning from it, but what I wanted was: how did the translator handle? It Laura Engram, show they asked the same question and I thought that's really good question. if literally a single question, if you're an interpreter. Are you trying to translate Biden and he goes into one

nonsense babble sentences. What do you do? Do you wait see if you can figure out what the main concept was already a keep Or do you translate as it goes, because if translates as it goes. People are gonna think you're, a bad translator. because I hear you translating they say well that translation doesn't make any sense. So we get a bad translator here. Clearly, nobody would say those words, because the bunch of nonsense, just is just words put together, is babble, but that's actually what he was doing. He was actually babbling now and that's a serious question. Is anybody as late as anybody done their job. What would you do? I literally serious question: do you translate? It urges just wait. And then try to summarize if he ever gets to a point, or do you just skip it? What the hell do you do with that?

my favorite part. Was he misstated something about how and Angela Merkel and said that she was the largest chancellor since Helmut Kohl, who Helmut Kohl was not a thing man. Helmut Kohl was a sort of a large man, Angela Merkel,. Nobody is culture is felt in a few years. The the words that the word she never hears is well you're, looking smell today, nobody goes up. There goes with the largest chancellor, No, you didn't know that you realise what he suddenly corrected quickly so, but it still funny.

So, apparently, the allay his dinner institute, a mask requirement, closer more infections. Yes, and the L a county sheriff just said. Well, this is many a statement from an l, a county sheriff already sheriff you the LOS Angeles carried Vermin, a public health problem its authority to enforce the order, but the under fund slash differ, De Los Angeles County shares Department will not expand our limited resources, steady s for voluntary compliance. These basic they tell you to go ahead and and violate the law or whatever. This is law

Was a guideline: what the hell is it it's an order, so it's called an order. I know you have to order how's that work. Do you have to pay an order from the government's? If it's not a law? What does it even mean? An order with a spot gives me an order. Alabama rule. I might even obey a law order, an order. Really. You can give me a fucking order we're a mask I'll think so maybe a suggestion I'll listen to a suggestion and if it's a law are probably aware, but an order. No, no. Thank you. So then he said Bob. To always,

we encourage the deeply age to work with the Board of supervisors. To come up with a mandate that are the record, both achievable unsupportable by science. Does he pointed out that the CDC says is not science so, best. L, a county share of ever here His response to this is just brilliant, just brilliant is just the best response ever and so. It turns out that my county is one of the Idiot counties that is going to require mass again. Will I be wearing masks in stores? Well, I I'm gonna go into the the. What would you call a day. What do you call it when you denies, you don't follow the rules you're, a conscientious objector, that's what

I believe I will be a consciences conscientious objector, and by that I mean. If a store in my local area is requiring the mask were vaccinated, people which I am. I'm going to enter the store without my mask and I'm gonna make them asked me to leave. If they do asked me to leave. I will very obediently leave, but also point out that the CDC disagrees, that there is any reason from ITALY now they won't get the benefit of my? and I shall be very polite about it because- The store owner is not my enemy right. Remember, the store owner is a victim just like you. Store owner is not your enemy, so don't be an asshole to the store owner if they try to enforce it. To try to keep stay out of trouble. The store owner is not the asshole, so just be polite to them,

but my personal decision is that I will be a conscientious objector. And I will enter within mask now, politely explain why and if there are enough of me it's over because we cannot let the government to make this decision for us in the beginning, of course, is its emergency and it's better to listen to the government in an emergency than probably not most cases could be exceptions. But were passed that leper remember what did they way house just tell me The White House just said it's only a pandemic for on vaccinated people. What am I vaccinated?

play pandemic, the White House told me I'm personally not in the pandemic, so I'm going to act like it. So he says I just pretend I'm definitely keep walking yeah. I don't know what kind of enforcement there is. So what would happen if you just ignore it? That would be my recommendation for those who are so inclined. Here's assign I'd like to see in a California store window. I dont think This'Ll happen, but it's what I'd like to see as a sort of borrows the l, a county, sheriffs. concept here will say as Ella me, the county where I live. It's? U sign that says the carrier. Bellamy, there's reinstated, mask requirements we well From them to help us enforced seven that requirement the store is not staffed for that function.

Do you know I stores don't have enough staff the government, because the government is paying people not to work. so. How can the store haven't staff to deal with masks and also deal with the business of the store When they can even higher enough people, because the government is paying, It will not work. So I think would be perfectly fair forest or to say I fully support your mask requirement. Sure wish I can iron of people to help you with that, but the gap. So I'm not going to. We don't have anybody in that position the mask the position of a mask, what we call it proctor, something the mask. Proctor position is open. You can even put a help. One inside mask mandate, enforcer wanted in each other's open position

Enforcers, yes, I'd people are asking: there's a hashtag, hey Tucker now for people asking talking Karlsson to tell the public if he has been vaccinated himself. What do you think that do you think that Tucker girls in a private citizen, whether public job, do you think that? asian violate his hip privacy rights and tell you if you personally vaccinate? What do you think I would say he shouldn't not if he doesn't want to meaning that. It needs to be up to him, of course, as it should be up to all this, you saw me make my decision right.

My decision was on the public figure and I talk about this topic all the time and it would be in my view, it would be unethical not tell you my own decision, but that's a very personal kind of thing. I don't think it would be of ethical for anybody else. That's just personally I like feel about it. Anybody else was fine. Somebody says you were older exactly exactly this is why talking about it, I think is fair, I'm being begged to get off of this livestream right now for something important. all go in the moment. Yeah. I can tell you what my situation is Michael, Michael Morbidity and until you, what I did, but that doesn't That's your situation and doesn't mean you should follow my lead.

Push through something that says that you ve got to have some kind of the passport or vaccination to do some public stuff and it it pushed up their vaccination rate like crazy, so lotta people getting vaccinated France. So let me reiterate, information is good. If somebody wants to tell you, they gave ex needed great. So let me reiterate. Information is good. If somebody wants to tell you, they are vaccinated great, but coercion and persuasion on this topic, I feel, is inappropriate in unethical.

I would avoid doing it, although I realise I do it accidentally, I do have to go, and so I do have to go and thank you for putting up with me again I'll talk to you again soon.