And working with the locals subscribers here, trying to work it out and somehow magically it's all working out. So if you can hear me and something work too fine thanks for showing up now, you missed the first part of the presentation where I send this over to my email doesn't seem like I'm not prepared today at massive technical problems. Bear with me one moment: ah fuck me, I swear to God. Have you learned that just try to use a an application. It is like you have to be a hacker to get into your own account. Now I've got like multiple.

Sign on certain. They ve got a text me and they ve got a changed my password and fix my settings and update my software. Every fucking time I want to use the application, my God the stuff is so fuckin broken leg, just just use every application. I've done like search my erect. For the last side in I've. Gotta get a new password something's out of date. I care Fucking just turn on the application and just fucking use it. Jesus sorry didn't mean to take the Lord's name, so there's always do since I'm locked out of some other fucking account that I use every day for no fucking reason that just happen overnight. I'm gonna be looking sideways to get my nose. Do I seem like Canada Cranky booed this work.

Does it does it feel like? Maybe I could explode. Surely says to please explain my Jesus signed to those wouldn't understand so over my shoulder, if your listing on audiovisual sign says Jesus King is. The audio is fine. It only says that, because I've got yellow sticking, those over parts of the words on the original sign unless to say the king part was the last part of a word, the started with f. So I got rid of the F you seaport. and I didn't like taking the name, the Lord's name. here on live stream, so is the eye ass is used to say Christ, but I get rid of the situation.

so I just turned from a very vulgar sign into a very polite one. Jesus king is Sorry, I didn't think I was gonna get Youtube, the oil is actually talk about content very happy that the Olympics is on and couple island Today, so I'm not gonna talk much about the Olympics, but there are some really good highlights some Good NEWS: number one. The american women Soccer team lost I don't know about you, but I was, I was sorry rooting for them to lose. Do I not understand how the Olympics works? I'm not supposed to be rooting for my own country lose right. I kind of dead. I can't be room for them lose because the

really. You know the whole point of representing your country, if you're not going to do that. If you're, not gonna representing your country and you get a deal for the national anthem result, I am all for that year. You're welcome to have your protest and I have no problem with that whatsoever. However, however, I also have the right to root against you, so I was gonna happy that the women's soccer team lost because they represent me in a way that I wanna be represented now number to the other. Best story is that the New Zealand? weightlifter Laurel hovered History does she ll be the first openly transgender for the latter to compete at the Olympics in weightlifting, so Laurel Hubbard transgender athlete is in the Olympics, and I find this a highlighted. We lunatics personally

Now I know some of you may be purists insane to your solemn, hey. This is ruining the sport, its unfair to two biologically naturally born women. That offences I've lost track serves as offensive wasn't meant to me, but I love this story because First of all was appointed the Olympics. Nothing really. I mean the Olympics ETA, a purpose in olden days, but that are really any purpose. Now it's Sal advertisements are tv sponsors onto that does really every purpose. In my, in my view, the Olympic Stone but their entertainment now be honest. What do you find more entertaining the in shooting competition, the jumping up and down and weird ways, competition

leaving over things, competition, the running faster vision, which one of those is entertaining, maybe not any other. But can you tell me you're not entertained by a transgender athlete coming into the weightlifting unwilling everything come on. You could have lots of feelings about that. That's a separate topic, but it's definitely entertaining so. What's so other? So there's no information on the work on virus leak, hypothesis. Who lost all she lost already the tree. general athlete already lost that ruins everything

I think I might want to see some blood tests of whoever Bt Transgender F might want to see a little blood tests there to say it. so anyway that we will make us more information that makes it look like it was league. So, first all they had a leadership change at the lab and twenty nineteen, oh yeah, something missing. Isn't there. Oh, my god do. You realize I leaped into this. Without the simultaneous it yeah, it's pretty pretty badly, but never too late ever too late. And if you like to enjoy this to the maximum mobility that you can

Muster all you need is a copper, my real ass, a tangled jealousies, dynamic anti drug of last, a vessel of any kind fill it with a favorite liquid coffee jointly now for the unparalleled. Pleasure dope Amelia the day. The thing makes everything better, including the Youtube APP is called the simultaneous up and watch it happen now. Go. Well, for those of you on Youtube overall the locals platform and watching the commenter, who has put a picture of a cat eating a banana. And if you think, that's not entertaining features so wrong. Cat Eu banana, entertaining every time. I go on lab spheres, we found out about the lab, apparently one is that there was a man, Lisbon change and twenty nineteen, which suggests. Maybe there was some problems at the change management,

number two. There was a proposal around too two the ventilation two years after the ventilation had been pointed new so there might have been some problem with the ventilation that they were aware of just about the wrong time. If you know what I mean. Firstly, there was a increase in Google searches uncovered nineteen. I don't even have a name. Covid, nineteen, that a name before I had a name and people are Google searching it before you ever heard of it. I don't understand that part of the store So where's bunch of activity around the lab at about that time and no intermediate species and found that would suggest that it came from a natural speed and then also a couple more exports have told you that I could easily have been Bio engineered and you wouldn t see a trace of it. Do you remember the first?

like a year, the common knowledge was that you could not bio engineer this virus without leaving signs that it was done by humans You remember that, though it that was common knowledge there play before this. Sometimes I hear things before you do, and I can't give you examples. Cuz then I'd have to tell you how I found out about them and stuff. So trust me there. Sometimes I hear the news a year before you like literally a year before you hear it something like a few weeks into the pandemic at the very beginning pandemic. I had long phone call was one of you're one of the smartest people who knows about this kind of stuff. And thus smartest person showed me a saddle

a picture of the rules on lab and set? It came out of there in all likelihood nothing proven, but it was too coincidental whose across the street from the well on the way. Market. So long before the news was reporting everything I was looking at a picture of the Wuhan LAB on a Google map and I'm being told by somebody, was really smart. This is where it came from. At the same time, I asked the question: could you make this virus look like? It was natural if it had been bioengineered in the person that I talk to you. oh yeah. Definitely you could definitely make it look natural. So that's why I knew like months and months before it was in the news zone. So I'm not unique

That way, so there are plenty of people who knew what was going on, but here's a weird part why they take a year. I think it felt like a year, maybe was just months for experts to say that it could have been engineering. You wouldn't know the difference. Why did that takes a long been? I knew it. I knew it probably year before it was public knowledge and Scott once again, narcissist. So what are the weird things about narcissism? Is that narcissists think other people are narcissists? I don't know if you knew that, but that's one of the one of the traits is that if you are a narcissist, you project, and so you see other people as narcissist and what problems. You have you just see them and other people and I've come to believe that a lot of my critics are just Narcissus,

and the problem is that they're, pretty sure they're right can never be wrong and if I say something that disagrees with anything that they believe it's got to be a problem with me and the way you can tell that it's nurses as opposed to just critics limit Lemme give you. Let me give you a contrast. So today, if you sorry my twitter, two inches of people saying things about me, such as Scott Scott- must be either bottle. compromise bought into the narrative or afraid. Those are the only explanation for why my opinion might be different from listening. My credit critics, the only wrists there could be no other reasons, but that had been bribed or I've got some gotta problem go alone or I can't wrong or something like that now,

Here's a levy contrast, a conversation I had with an economist who is not a narcissist and one like this Scott any analysis of the risk of vaccines. Moreover, you forgot one very important variable and I asked for clarification- And the economist gave me the variable and then I said a good point. I should bring that up. The point was that in the short term, your risk of the vaccine- vaccination is, you know, there's one risk for the vaccination, but since I have to get the vaccination because your odds of actually getting the virus in the short term or almost nothing so that short term long term way that I was framing things was missing. A big variable whether the economists who was

Not a narcissist gives me a criticism. I say what what what facts are you looking at? What arguments are you looking at its best added to me, and then I say good point and then just like I did now, you that my argument was flawed and then I corrected that's out: that's how to people who are not having any kind of mental difficulty have a conversation. Oh you forgot this variable. What is this variable good point? I have now changed my opinion Incorporate that variable now, what does it look like? What a narcissist comes after me? Does it look like us? You forgot a variable of you consider this in your argument. Never never it's always of is always some assumption about me finally been broken in one. A variety of ways

what's going on now, I'm clearly broken, as anybody else in my own way is right. World everybody's fucked up, if you think, there's somebody if you think that there's a online Joe Joe, it's not name, calling, if you talking about me when I say somebody's narcissists, thus a description of behaviors, tat, name calling so edit. I policies which I'm giving you support for so pretty different. The name called, but maybe you talk about some of the comments. when you see the people coming after me with nothing but attacks on my character were of saying have been bought offers only like that they are probably not actual credit.

In the classic sense where they have something to complain about, they seem to be just nurses and their projecting upon me. That's what looks on end and you you can tell, because you can look for cases where I've changed my mind, because it was data I just gave you went and did I have any problem? Just observed me, Have any problem tell you that I was wrong and have now corrected. I have no problem with that, because remember the nature of this life street is about sort of mental outside the biggest seem to go through. All of it is mental illusions which were all trying to get past So if I have a mental illusion at a total like brain fart, I'd like to show it to you

my motivation is to show you I was wrong not to show we have right all the time, but if I am right It is very useful as a tool, hear me explain them right so that you can judge of this kind to track wreck Then? The next thing I say you say well, Was- was put that the context How many times is that right or wrong that issue? So do you. If his like narcissism to tell you how often I've been right, just put it put it in a different category is useful. You need to know what I think is my track record. Dissipate with ensure, but you need to know what I think around to get put my opinions in context

thinking of China. They get problems with the Wolf on lake. They ve got bassett flooding. They ve got pollution through the roof they ve got. They ve got prison camps. If they may be harvesting organs from political dissidents, their stealing our intellectual property. Their dominating the south, China see they're doing just about everything. Bad you could do. The list is a law that is hard to go through them. All. China There is no longer safe for business. and as that their understanding serves to permit the rest of the world. China's guess a big Big problems coming. Some of them are just baked into the fact that it's a big country and lots of big things could happen from your floods and climate and everything else

But I've got a feeling the China might have like a really big problem. Coming and you'll know it. When you see it, it's going to come in a variety of ways from a variety of sources, and it's going to look like a lot of coincidences. Here's, a question. I asked you since we do seem to know that China has this concept of one of the colored total warfare or something where there really trying to degrade their opponents in every way they can. They tried to do with psychology with the law, with technology with hacking just every way you can short of shooting and actual missile, and what are you assume about their adversaries? Do you assume unrestricted warfare? Thus the Fraser users.

What are you assume that the adversaries, we all know it right all of the adversaries to China? No, that that's their stated, philosophy the unrest, in warfare and we see the music it. So there is no doubt that they believe it there's. No doubt there are doing it everyday. What do you think we're doing? What do you think a great Britain's do about it? What is Europe's civil about? What you think Japan's do about it about South Korea. About the United States. Now one one theory is that we're doing nothing, because maybe we just don't do that as possible. But what do you think was more like because there is a one complete I'd know have about By- is not a pussy. it would anyone just do that, I'm open to a counter, or even on that

But as much as I like your trouble for a lot of stuff, I think different presents a good for different stuff. So it is good that we alternate them. So you get the good stuff of each personality, but I don't think pussy I've gotta feeling the Biden is calculation and China under the odd wages, don't know it, and you wouldn't tell us possessing the presidency is don't know that there's no way I know that for sure, and I wish we could see some signs of it, but I don't think it works that way. So my guess is that the the counter attacks to balance out whatever whatever they'll China is doing. are probably just ramping up, so I would imagine that word just getting busy that stuff now, one of the biggest

risks, as you might now. Is that China, with his belgian road initiative and its basically trying to get influence over all the smaller countries, especially if they have Their earth minerals, so one of the biggest ways that China can conquer the world and dominated by controlling all the rarest of the minerals that are needed for all pretty much all technology. That's also, if you didn't know it- and I think this is true I'll- take a fact check on this too, but I think it is true that the reason. Space exploration is such a big fucking deal is that if the United States can get an asteroid, guess your retirement or minerals off the asteroids I would also have access so space, maybe

The only place we get the materials we need to be an advanced civilization now. The other thing that you have to factor in with China and China also makes too many of our medicines. The other thing you have to factory and is that the chinese billionaires, probably have as much influence over there as a billionaire does anywhere else, which is alot again. I would take effect jacket joining the richest people in China are like the richest people anywhere else. They have lots of influence serve the region

people in China are less say. Many of them are own mines and rare earth. Everything this in that every morning, there's a birth and walks across my security camera during the Life street just one one time this little blackbird he just walked across the security camera. Once anyway, so serious point, China is trying to control these rare rare earth, materials and pharmaceuticals, but if we ever got into a deep problem with China, if it became military. That's the least of our problems right if we get if we ended up in a in a full out military conflict with China, we're not going to be worrying about pharmaceutical access. Cuz the whole damn planet will be destroyed But if it's not for military conflict.

The billionaires they control the Pharmaceuticals, China or control the mining interest are gonna. Let the government shut them down now, of course, the government is more powerful than A billion there, even in China, but still there, some big big influences in China, there will be pushing back. Imagine if you will this sort of Asia a mutually assured destruction when it comes to China and pharmaceuticals or rare earth, minerals wallet the day the China said, we're not, could give you, America and he read Earth minerals, already pharmaceuticals, we're just cut me off what would happen the same day. It will be the end of China economy would go into a free, fallen, never recover right. A summary says, warrior wouldn't be war will be economic war and it would be permanent. It would be present. There would be no risk.

Every if child ever said we have we, monopoly on your everything, your pharmaceuticals, you're, a rare earths, minerals and we're going to stop you from having them. That would be the end of the chinese economy. Does the chinese economy depends on the rest of the world it doesnt operate. Independent and the rest of the world would just say: ok, that's too far less do, for you can't be trusted with everything not arouse minerals. Now, pharmaceuticals, frigate nothin, so without media So unless worried about them cutting off things, then maybe other people are because it would be literally suicide. China would be destroying itself. China is surrounded by enemies saying in the in the comments, so that it would be suicide for China to start to work. Well

I've been any superpower the guests in a world with another superpower. Why? I need you to the only reason you do, that is, if you just given up on living space ethics possible. So China, I see coming for a big reckoning and I don't think China Silly knows how big it will be. As I told you before, they're always force you can see and forces you can't see enforces. You can't see, are leaving pretty hard on China right now and you can see the effect of that. Probably failure so, Alexander than men. You all know him from the famous trump impeachment trials. He was the officers now retired he's gotta book, but you said something in an interview that I want. Share with you, because it looks like it's written by our professional persuaded.

So here's an actual state what he said about the Trump administration he said quote. We could have had a collapse of government and could have been entirely different country so according to vent and were very close to a collapse of government and could have had, we could have been in totally different country? Does that sound like something the women came up with on his own? Maybe you might have some training in some kind of. Persuasion or something like that, but let me tell you why this is a good persuasion, the sentence we could have been in an entirely different country, Sammy. We could abandoned in an entirely different country. This is

she'll do at EU level. Persuasion. I dont know if the publisher help them with it. I dont have a Democrat persuade her helped with it. Ok I'll get to that moment, just some breaking news came across my phone. So women is cleverly leaving it to your imagination of. What's the worst say, you can imagine that this country could have turned To which, as other thing, that's good persuasion, if you tell us somebody's something specific there. likely say now that the specific thing never think that was going to happen, so Vincent had said, for example, if you said it would be a dictatorship, but a year, even people

didn't like Trump would have said. I don't know about that. I don't think it would have been a dictatorship, but if you leave it open and you say- could have been an entirely different. country, then everybody who has a fear. Can fill in that entirely different country, with whatever they're afraid of that's why this is first rate technology. I'm sorry, persuasion it doesn't look like women would be the kind of person who would be trained to come up with that good of a sentence. It looks like you had help, but that's speculation. See you then just became hilarious. Now, if you didn't see this news, apparently Trump, has amassed a hundred miles, in dollars, and political funds from fund raising firstly, on his claims about the election not being not being fair,.

now he's got a million dollars. I think the next biggest amount that enable politician add, is TIM, Scott, Miss Gallagher, Billy, I'm not even close, so even if it's just money. That is the only way trump influences things, of course, it'll be more than that, but he has so much money to influence things that you can effect races. You can affect Congress all kinds of stuff, so see you, then just one full panic on Trump, partly because it's good for their business model, but check out Fox NEWS website front page. He was stories or covering the gun Say then, look at just all the headlines and see what the covering today it's not even the same planet now its common that they cover the news differently, thus the most common thing, but they usually at least are talking about the same stories.

That is on the same stories because I've decided that the return of Trump is like that the only story so limited the idea of some other things These are just the headlines just from today, the sea and then website and Fox doesn't have any other shit. So, just from today, trumps hundred million dollar threat to democracy. Now he has, he hasn't raised a million dollars for his political preferences. It's on billion dollars threat to democracy. Democracy itself is gonna, be attacked with trumps. A hundred million dollars says CNN had life. Here's the funniest one and I didn't click- the articles are read it so I dont know the article said. But I do know the article said: who can read you the headline and you also read the article, but you know what the article says: ok, here's era

She survived attack by Jonestown called numbers. Here what she says about Trump so the actual headline of sea, then she's you survived the Jonestown called members. Here, what she says about job now, if this is not see them becoming a parody of itself. I don't know others buyers, another the disgraced ex president. Raising enormous sums on the power of a lie. is fundamentally altering politics. The disgraced Ex president disgraced expressly Can you say that about everybody? Couldn't you say the disgraced current president? You just throw in that disgraced. Part of people will accept it.

Luckily I guess work starts Orwellian disgraced everytime. I talk about a politician, so the disgraced Nancy Pelosi was talking to the disgraced Joe Mansion, just Rowan. Anybody Germanic is not not disgraced, but we'll just run disgraced. Make you think, that's a fact: There is another one from CNN headlines: video shows Texas family pleading with officer on top of black team is my imagination, or did we have an absent. of police officers on the backs of black teens. For several months during the first part of the binding administration. But now, as soon as Trump is back in the news, there's a cop on a black is bad

Just write one: you want right when he had expected the moment the moment the Trump is it is. It is a fear. Well, there's a cop on a black persons back happened right on time which, by the way, just to be clear ill at any of the stuff is a tragedy. Some not making fun of the event itself beg you fancy, then, for discovering certain. The story is just when they need to be discovered. Here's another one Democrats increased pressure to act on the eviction moratorium. One congresswoman slept on the capital steps. Now the Democrats increase pressure to act on it Sure moratorium sounds gotta dry. Doesn't it

what where words like disgraced and threat to democracy? Well, let me ask you this: if tromp had been, president endlessly Republicans Control Congress. and we were in the same place? We are now with the. the moratorium on rents, sorrow running out? Do you say that the news would treat Trump this this dryly? I think they say Trump, He's trying to put people on the streets and favour landlords. This would be completely different news if trumpet then in present, but But as long as Democrats, Recharge is just just some their work in our little headline, some worker. And then there was a marking of the Arizona or of course goes it getting hit that pretty hard, so your summer break in

whose from us a step nearer so I guess it was a edgy rose and said that back when he was the acting edgy, I got to re reading for the first time said that deal GI will look in delegations in Pennsylvania, but this what he had said to trump back in that phone call that was reported, but the deity can't overturned results. Even if there are issues to this term said. I don't expect you to do that. Overtook results just say that the election was corrupt. So little clarification there so trumpet not trying to overturn the results. He was just trying to get them to say that it was corrupt, think they said them so. I feel like this is a story of everything. Working the way was supposed to work is now. Where were we

you, what would you hope to happen is listening. The trumpet truly believe that the election was stolen? I think that's fair, don't you think, actually believes the right way also gives making love. I think you literally believes, and he might be right. We don't know without there's no evidence to prove his right, but there's no evidence to prove is wrong either so I'd say, that's an unknown and suppose you had a president who believed really believed that the election was corrupt? What would you do about it? What what would be the most reasonable thing to do about it? What do you really believe that He was only talk about in public, but it would also- talk to his energy, and maybe you get the attorney general to Dell What he thought was the right thing now again, we're not gonna talk about whether the right thing, but he thought I was, I think, there's

say, and then the attorney general just didn't, do it. journey generals at now. That's apparently said nothing. I can do that and then he didn't do it. I was fine is that exactly the way the system is post or the price. legitimately believes there is a big problem tries get as many people to get on his side. That's supposed to work that way right. You, people on your side to help you make your case this. Person said now in my professional capacity. This would be the wrong thing to do and that he doesn't doing everything about. This is something working in the way you want it to work, Am I wrong? You might not like how things went, but didn't the system were just the way wanted to. People legitimately, going after a problem, maybe the wrong about a bigger problem. but legitimately they thought it was a problem and when, after it.

In all the right ways that obviously the protests in the capital we're out of control. the violence is condemned by everyone, but Sir It makes sense to try to get people involved and get opinions and then than the poorest. National, whose job it was to be objective, said he's not gonna. Do that? That's just what you want. Sort of like a story about nothing happening, so anyway, I see events during the whole trumpets D, the monster under the bed routine, Rasmussen says that seventy five percent of liberals say you should, be required to wear a mask in public, even if you already had covered. So seventy five percent of liberals, so you should wear a mask even if you've already had covid now. The latest information is that if you've already had it, you can't get it and you can spread.

Seventy five percent liberals thank you where a mask in the context of you, can't get it and can spread. It agreed signs now. Now, when I say you can't get gas, breaded, there's always an exception, but the exceptions are too small to matter. In this case headaches. that do you think that is all you do is reverse, which presidents were saying. What that that would just reverse is: is that, based on any kind of science That's the least scientific thing. I've ever seen in my life, but worse,

one in nine percent of conservatives agree almost almost a third of conservatives also thank you. She wear mask if you ve already recover from Crone virus. What's going on here seriously, what's going on, I don't understand it. Is it because they don't know The fact is, it is a pure brainwashing. Is there no rational thought about this whatsoever and what news what news entity is telling them to do this is, I don't even think, see, then install your Ebay to wear a mask if they ve been vaccinated. Are there is there some does Fouche even say that, and we found she was a very mask, but nobody believes them right. Are they believing

algae battle. Don't even understand this. I don't know how you get this number sorcerer mine bedding So the Arizona state Senate, as requested in some kind of technical review, sort of an audit of the dominion systems was dominion. Software or hardware. To somebody tell me the comments is that million, are they hardware and software, or just one of the other? Probably both I'm seeing both thanks. Thank you for that, so their bull hardware and software, and they have declined, of course, and there's they're, saying that two people doing the audit are not qualified and therefore, why really solve Information and you authors feels like I don't wanna make too much of the analogy. This is just something that feels like something else. It doesnt munition draw a conclusion: but it shows exactly like trumps taxes. Doesn't it because the reason that.

Yeah that the obvious thing there you you wonder if from doesn't want to release his taxes, you say to yourself all that means there is a problem. they're right. If you don't want to release to taxes that these s, because you know there's a problem- something illegal right now now that's what very inexperienced people think. The reason you don't release your taxes is that people will imagine there are problems and if they can see them, they can't make stuff up based on anything, You just have to really just purely speculate, but as soon as the actual taxes are available, people are gonna, look at them and they will report to you that there is a crime in their even as tourism. so, there's a hundred percent chance that bad people wills

there is a crime and his right there in the taxes, you can look for yourself. If you had the taxes and need to look or so the odds of fake news coming out of terms tat, Returns is a hundred percent, is one hundred percent you are guaranteed. that'll? Be some. I don't know how many, but there will be some fake news based on trumps taxes. and it will be well and line numbers, seventeen he clearly did whatever and then, if you ever looked at it, wouldn't be that razetta context or some damn thing. So anybody who argues Trump should release his taxes. If there's nothing illegal in there don't know anything about the world. That's not how the world works. People are going to find the problem, even if it's not there, it doesn't have to be there for the

find it you have you have you been alive the last five years? It doesn't need to be there, he just s, release them, and then they ll say is there and half of the country will believe whoever tells them that they looked at it and they said while this problem now dominion has the same african problem does, Many of you have a problem that their hiding. What do you think are they hiding the problem? tell your your suspicious nature is well. Somebody doesn't want to be transparent, their hiding a problem. but imagine if they let all that stuff out. Do you think that there would be a less say, a cyber expert who would look at their code and find a vulnerability ass?

ass. The percent chance even a vulnerability they ve, never they're, not even aware of, if Very large complicated system released their other ip. Anybody want to look at it all of it would be in. People would find bugs out all over the place. Every time windows releases a new release. Somebody finds a major security bug. You don't think Microsoft looked at it carefully before they released. It lay dead that a lot of people look at it and then they released it almost every time. Some major bugger vulnerability so So you ve got this weird situation where dominion in order to have the

business that they have. They have to convince the public that they're a credible organization with no major problems. Their problem is they can't convince us their credible if they dont release code, because there is no transparency, but they also can't convince us that credible. If they do really Sir Code, they have to wait too long, there no way to win just like job. If he doesn't releases tax returns, you assume the worst. If he does This is actually terms. Fake news will tell you the worse. Even this is another just like the moon. You're gonna find all kinds of problems are. Even if there are ninety. matters there's a problem. There are we'll find one and it will be ugly along the lines of well. There's is on your ability. We we have any way of knowing it was exploited, but is there

So I was at a fair election. We can't now we can now, because you can't tell and have said this before, if you, if you have a system that, on all the ball for any reason, really have an election. Let me say that again, if your election is on order to pull for any reason, and ours are because there's there's no audit of the hardware and software component. If you haven't done now, you have really done on it. You can you can look at corners of things you can t you can count a lot of things check, ballots whatever, but if you haven't checked the electronic systems, I don't know they. You wanted it and therefore its not even in a real election. My life, any assistance, something happened at the president took office. Wasn't an election with.

Now, if we, if we could or that we would now boy gap, we counted come you suggested long ago? We should give up the right of privacy to allow the odd yeah? That would help I don't know if you have to give up the right if you'd have to give up the right of privacy or would you Because all you really need is for everybody to be able to check their own vote. Does I give you? Does I give up the right to privacy? because I could imagine that you would have maybe a code that only you knew this matched with a code in the database. So you could check your coat against the database to see if you voted, you still be anonymous or would that be too much of Rebuilding somebody says you can do this in Colorado, so fairly is doable.

yeah, it's not like everybody s to do it. You just have to have enough people, do it to catch any fraud. I see what else we gonna hear. Elsie is threatening to kill the infrastructure bill. Now I made a prediction: that the infrastructure bill is just goody, sorted the forever, never done not long forever, those but everytime areas. Have you see a headline that says it looks like we're? Gonna breakthrough on the infrastructure bill looks like we got some a partisan movement. Now no, Every time you see anything about infrastructure, about ready to get side. Recording the back of your head should say. Probably not so

Snow Elsie is threatening to kill the bill with her with her a pack of people who agree with her, based on the fact that its not liberal enough in the sense that doesn't have enough goodies in their dominion, dominion means sovereignty over which is unfortunate name for voting company electric helicopters, others somebody's really electric helicopters. I can't wait for my electric helicopter, alright says so. That's all I got for today not much happening there and just go. Look at your comments for a moment see if there's anything I missed

Production on the governors race, you now, I need to check on the poles. I haven't seen the Poles of California as Governor Race, the recall race, I dont know if Larry elders within striking distance but I'll check, internet, Yad, desired goal. David I'm talking about bill, MAR Larry elders as sixteen percent, but that's boat, but once it gets down to an assured, the election recall works, but once we once you feel it's really between two people, that's when it gets interesting. It's not one. Somebody say.

Take it from an aeronautical engineer, electric helicopters, air taxis not going to happen soon, o Stephen, I'm gonna disagree with you there about electric airplanes and like through taxes, because they are the only gaining factor, is the battery capacity and wait right and battery capacity in weight are reaching some critical cross over points. So I think we're really close to the crossover where the battery technology is good enough, but has never ban, is never been good enough up to this point,. Yes and the weight of the batteries, bigger summits, as airlines rashly ordering electric planes for delivery years about that's true.

the latest electric car is over a ton. Somebody says I wasn't breaking news, it wasn't breaking. It was just an update on the what Trump said to the attorney general back in the day. One slide around at us

Towers fully charged thing, so what's the smallest, a nuclear reactor can get while their small enough to be on naval ships and small enough to be in satellite right. Aren't satellites nuclear powered someone illicit asking me? If I'm you know, I'm not write a different topics covered by here in the comments, but I think we're done for today and I will talk to you tomorrow, assuming Youtube works.