A lower very little bit behind here, god dammit, my technology is bad, sorry didn't mean to swear but she's tell you my new Ipad situation disaster so far and I'll be Ruth you in a moment arright everybody good right here we are and pretty sure that they take knowledge is working until you are, Oh, my bought two identical ipads so that their brand new and they have the latest operating system that everything be good except one of the new ones, doesn't work for Youtube or Twitter. The APS just crashed through all there.

Brand new, updated revenue, Ipad, lay operating system and system? They can't do you tube the candy twitter, but it's identical cousin. Those both on five fine carry bullet whistle. they changed, how you a rebirth dunes, everybody knows how to reboot up Ipad doesnt doesnt work holding down the power I Martens on Iraq shut up. I can think you're, not gonna work. Don't talk to me just go over there and shut up. I would you like to enjoy Lucy. I call the simultaneous up. I read as a cover mother Glossop tanker Jewelsdiamonds, Anti Drug Alaska vessel of any kind. Fellow, Favorite liquid, I like coffee and drive and now for the unparalleled pleasure the dope mean here today. That makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sit and watch it go now. Go.

I saw the little bit late this morning because I was compiling an amazing tweet and I was just done Already too and level headed sand. I said, as far as I know, no city, state or country on the planet as beaten covered with I've reflecting were hydroxyl chloroprene Lots of places are access the vaccines, whereas I Imagine how drugs conquering are widely available. So how does your worldview explain that. So I must say it works or doesn't work you get banned from social media if you take her any kind of a positive take on those things. So there is the question

Your worldview says that day, those two things less, how many of you all of you, but for many of you, your worldview, is that those things work. Why have they not work anywhere on earth ever think about that doesnt work anywhere on earth? not one place has made that work, but according to the studies. Those things were gray right. So you think that Didn't have access to vaccines would be sucked. their stuff up and would have cure their problems like crazy or or is it possible? Somebody covers as Mcafee died, and now we have a new virus coincidence. Baby.

So to check your worldview if he were a subscriber to locals, and many of them were watching me right now What you learned and the last few days, were you learned my framework and technique for creativity, which you couldn't learn any other way locals platform, and you also saw my my explanation of my life streaming- set up that I've taken years to perfect and if my ipod work. in good shape. So that's why you must just this week and will be a lot more Here's a little interesting thing: Only the favour ability of nuclear power has reached day all time high at me like that,. Favorability of nuclear power an all time high and that the uptake- and

Popularity happened in the last for five years and especially in last couple, it looks like the biggest change happened after Trump left office, because I think that was just an automatic resistance to nuclear power. Republican collection. But as soon as you get Biden in an office, I think the Democrats just said. Well. If we are serious about climate change, I guess you'd better, be serious about nuclear power, simply what is probably the only way to get there, although there have been some good advances in batteries and stuff, but we haven't quite seen them actualized, but here's my question: I've told you before that I have this weird track record that when I'm trying to persuade on any national topic, if you looked at the graph of people's opinions you would find the point that I entered you- see a sharp change in the curve tat

For example, when I started persuading years ago on the right to die the ability to have a doctor assisted death and if you look at the gallop, you see that traddles I by Rodi viral peace, in favour of that right, you can see that, just as I am, I did that viral piece which were just about everywhere. Really it actually met a big impact, Easy that occur of just one engaged now that, because I was persuaded, there's no reason to believe that goes: curves change things, age. but there's this weird coincidence that whenever I enter a fight, persuasion wise the curve just changes in my direction pretty much every time I get things moving, option, but I think it's probably easier to explain it in terms of the joy

causes that I know I'll win or that there are going to go in that direction, so I'm going to say it's less about cause and effect and more about knowing what things need to happen and just sort of joining the parade. That's already moving, and I think that's a better explanation of what we're saying. but if you like, to believe that I those things to happen, that's great to just there's no evidence for that better, not his war room. He continues to be the most interesting content on the internet. Am I wrong whether its true staffer fakes of war, never know. What's true, it was not by abandons war. Room is just the most interesting stuff. I just never know if it's true true in terms of whether the the guests or are credible, There is another year.

Gentlemen? I do, I guess ass of experience in military intelligence. And apparently this fellow can look at demographics and registration, so demographic trends and registration. In the country and he can determine if your vote looks like it was fraudulent or not. So if there are more votes for a candidate, then either the demographic change in the four years since last vote or the number of register. Voters is that a whack just too many votes for the situation then he says that society, the maybe not always but maybe, might indicate. Broad now you say yourself,

likely. Is that model to work? They do you think that really can capture all that, because remember the trouble action is different than the other election, because using different character, I'm not sure if you will act in the same and then he had the pandemic. He throws all the rules out, but apparently predicted correctly all fifty states in twenty sixteen, including Florida. All fifty s right is model, Got all fifty states right claims, it seems like that would be something you could check, but if you really got all fifty states right using the same model, then the only thing that could be different is the pandemic. Does it was Trump both sides right? So you think that he'd have a handle on it, but I think the pandemic did change enough because the way people,

Changed so I'm not sure the bottle works, so I'm going to say that I think that the pandemic and then the legal changes devoting and all the mail in and stuff. I don't know that any model still works from twenty sixteen to twenty twenty, but it's out there's lots of them Promotion, so I did a unscientific Paul and I ask what's a bigger problem, for you at the moment is the bigger problem for you personally, the virus or the policies about the virus. What happened, of course, as you might imagine something like eighty nine percent said that the government's policies of the problems, eighty nine percent started with clubs of courses- is a deeply unscientific Paul, but do you think you would get a different result anywhere else,

If I I've been obviously my audience- leans, conservative, even even now- I'm not, but I feel like it would be. A vast majority of people would say that the government restrictions problem for them. Personally it we ve all been sort of hypnotized into thinking that what you do with a pandemic is more about the collective. It's not so much about your your personal was good for you, but if ninety so the country is worth anything over. Seventy five percent, I suppose, thinks that the bigger problem as the government then the virus. I think that to inform eared policymaking right, but I'm not sure it is so rasmussen didn't pull this? I did Joe Biden Wooden fairly and twenty twenty. What do you think people said twelve thirty. Six percent

The country still says no thirty, six percent of the country thinks we didn't have a fair election. So how do you have a democracy that stays intact with thirty six percent of the people think that something happened, but here's. The good news or is it depends on your point of view. Apparently, that number is lower than it was just a few months ago or June, Actually it was forty one percent June, but its stranded downloaded and accepts. The longer you go without a proof of the massive fraud, the less likely you gotta find it. I would say now that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I'm just saying that if the orders were going to produce something that would change our minds, I know we'd know by now, even though

ever released it officially. We ve got to know by now. So I'm not expected that happen. But how do you live in a world with so many people think they don't even live in a system that share? Maybe that's always been the case. Maybe it's always been the case that some is pointing out. You have to subtract out of twenty. Five percent were wrong about everything, no matter what the poles. Twenty five percent is what's wrong about everything and another measure. We should uphold, dump people and more there should be some minimum level of paying attention and intelligence before you even included in Nepal. Because do we need to know a dump, people think I guess we do as they make a lot of decisions Jack Posada got things interesting on twitter today with this treaty.

Said literally, every movie is better than the last July is one of those provocative candid tweets is good at doing a lot of them. But I like to add to that black widow, if you ve tried to watch the movie black widow that just came out on streaming. Oh, my god, it's tariff just is just This makes you feel bad. I watching the sleigh. You wait a minute, I thought I was signing up for something in the entertain, realm as opposed. something that's going to cause be PTSD. One of them makes you happy it's called entertainment The other one gives you mental illness, opposite of entertainment, black widow,

if you ve got any mental illnesses go exacerbate ass, yet because it's terrible it just makes you feel depressed and dark. Now here's the bigger point When was the last time you saw good movie, It's like exist, the problems: are our attention span shrunk? was it was a mark Wahlberg. Now it was good. We'll hunting. What's the name of the blunder guy bad David Matt Damon was just saying publicly that he doesn't think his children will watch movies. He doesn't think his children will watch movies, like the industry will just disappear I think you might be a little disappear who be like radio. You know when television came and ill transform in some way, So I think it'll be around, but the the idea,

also there for three hours watching something really gives you PTSD just make your Lapierre at the end. I just don't know that anybody wants that anymore, The whole idea of anybody watching anything at the same time doesn't make sense nonetheless, I think much of this before so what I build, my house. what we say here too, as an aid or so as to the planning and back. Then it was just a given that if you, if you are building a high and house you'll put his ear, Because that would be all your movie nights, you know you have your friends over you that you have a couple of martinis and you sit down and watch this great movie. It'll be starting something to build a building in evening When was the last time, you tried to get anybody to watch the same movie at the same time, it's really impossible. Now.

because people have either already see that assumes a came out screamed and your whenever or they don't want to. Watch it or they'll talk during it. because they said yes but they're not really interested in it. Just that the whole, putting people at a ribbon watching a movie and just as the thing anymore, we're all watching our own content on our phones and were much happier ballot, So I think movies are going way now. Here's the interesting part you were probably waiting for me to get through the interesting part, Zoran interesting part of others. Yes, You might be aware that the CIA has, Use the movie industry for years to brainwash the public, to making more patriotic, for example, or to have whatever whatever traits the gun I thought you should have you know maybe more family oriented blah de blah de blah. But what happens when movies go away?.

Those movies were the dominant way in which an tv shows, and I think the argument can apply to both of these domains. But the tv shows and movies were how the government created a culture. They told you what to act like then they showed you in movies and then you just grew up thinking. While I guess I act like that. Cuz we ain't get a weed just imitate. What happens when the programming interface for society disappears? What good would you computer be if there was no interface, the computer would still exist, but there would be any way. The programme.

That's happening. The interface for programming, the public into one coherent culture is dissolving so abbots who ends up programming citizens school right school, so, in other words, the teachers unions become. programmers of society they get the young people, but what about the older people, while social media right in the cabinets? Social media is the new programming entity, but here's the question Is the CIA manipulating social media.

for the same purpose in the same way that they manipulate, we know this now. This is a matter of fact: it's not speculation. We know that they have historically manipulated movies and probably tv shows, I think, that's confirmed. Do you think that their consciously trying to programme the public through social media now, certainly there their indulgence? specific questions, maybe the vaccines and maybe something about a war or something. But do you think, just generally their programming, you to know what kind of life to lead, because it doesn't look to me. Like the CIA is was programming you. Let me ask you this if the sea I wanted to program you to be a good citizen and make the country coherent and, like feel like, add one dominant culture. Would you see what you see on social media? Now? No right is the opposite:

Social media is ripping apart. The structure of America bye, bye, emphasising our differences? That's what it does best so oh, you can imagine that the CIA would move it influence and brainwashing from movies and tv that are collapsing into social media. That's the dominant media. What does it look like happening to me, because it would look completely different the word. Social media would be tell you to get a family and be a b, a nuclear family and your taxes and yell b be open minded about stuff. Oh yes, but. The solution is a higher screwing us. Yet it could be that the social media platforms are driven by I, the movies were driven by human beings behind the sea.

So I believe that were being programmed randomly for the first time, meaning that there is not one dominant program or interface. This programme in us as a culture where we're just taking inputs from everywhere or what is I do desire, destroy the cat I feel like it might. I got I don't feel like is its cause and effect in its obvious that that would destroy the country, but it might. right. I a year you the rule it out, because if the We think, as a country you are dominant beliefs, If those get whack, though a country falls apart, there's nobody would doubt that right. There is what you think about the world your worldview. if it gets all out of whack, the country falls apart.

Some would say that the best ass at the United States has ever had this narrative, the narrative, meaning that the story of the United States, If you, if you're, not citizens of the United States, probably recognise that too I think the United States become sort of at least one model that people look at say or do we want to be like that are now so we have. weird situation in which we are being randomly programmed for the first time. What happens? Will there be a dominant force that rises to program people? Does the network tv seems to be doing that, but its separating the left from the right? which is all bad news. So I feel as if probably

some solution will evolve just because we need it, but I don't know what that will be it's hard to say. I don't know that it will be influencers on the internet to her especially good good day. It could be that people who are seen as independent there if you might get a bigger audience and more more info. I see and the comments that the USA Soccer team needs to be programmed or brainwashed, I guess with the american story and I think you're right, you're right. That's perfect example watching our olympic athletes essentially ruin a tradition by turning it into something else. So you say: ashen reset my network settings,

my bed. What I want to thank you for your I'll, even Heather, why weren't rebooted? First anybody tell me how to rebuilding Ipad Modern one as it used to be just hold the power button. That seems to be changed. There's more stuff happening because too from biology stream of us. We should follow by the way. Follow biology stream of arson. Just trust me. When I give you recommendations of Hutu follow on Twitter is based on this that, if you follow me, you're almost certainly going to like oh, I recommend, because they are feeding into my worldview and strong way. One of them is biology, so is first aim is spelled it be a l, a J, ai, it just search for obliges dream of awesome. You find a way to end it today that and by the way his tweets, would be a whole variety of topics.

But if you just want to see what one of the smartest people on the planet thinks about stuff, it's worth doing because trust me he's one of the smartest people like another african planet knows more about more things than just about everybody. You now like border. since then the new you ve ever seen, so it is all of any talks about today and between a child has made a drone, as may drone armies ten times cheaper and it's a trend. What others a couple. events. I guess it must be a chinese company where their top end drones run for one to two million dollars apiece. Now, I'm not talking about the will. He Intel drones that obvious have talking about the big flying ones that look like an airplane and they have no souls for one or two million dollars. In other words, I could afford one right.

Rich enough? I'd probably will buy one, but I could buy a missile. Armed Chinese I had literally personally afford it. What the hell is gonna happen when the rest of you can afford it. It's not gonna, be I think the cost of a deadly drone is gonna, be sub a thousand dollars per issuer sub a thousand dollars. Now that I'm not talking about the big military, looking drones that our size of an airplane I'll tell you about the small ones, and I wrote about this long debate twenty years ago and as soon as you can get a rented from. You owe me a good business

by one drought and just runs down for a hundred thousand pop it'll get alot of customers want to kill. Your arrival borrow my drone. What one hundred thousand dollars and you can take out anybody anywhere. So may I will you see a swarms of small drones and explode when they reach a destination? There's no way, that's not gonna happen. Let me give you some of my arguments that my critics are making about me. I know you don't do well. Let me be honest with you a little bit. The news is written boring. I know the lot of you of them blaming me for being less interested late, less interesting lately, I cop to that I'm totally less interesting, but because I. Most measures based on the news and the news just without tromp I mean.

I suppose it Obama would be more interesting, but Biden justs, there's nothing to talk about, so I apologize. I expect the things will heed up, especially as we get into the air. the other, the mid term elections itself. So the way fun things ahead, but my subscribers locals and started bailing out, because every time I mention of vaccines and stuff like I stop talk about it, but it's gotta be only knows it's. The only thing and so I'm going to mention a little bit but I'll try to keep it tight and his some some topics you haven't seen before. One of my critics, or a lot of my critic, say one. My problems is that I never question the motives of government I assume too often the people have good motivations and that are not trying to put one over audio zone.

Those of you who watch me the most. Would you say it is an accurate criticism there. I'm too trusting of authority and save people say is accurate. but most people say smell mellow, give you some background. Who was the first public figure to tell you that, These CDC who the surgeon general were lying to you about masks, and the real reason was to keep you from hoarding them. Who was the first public figure, I'm aware of in the world. Let me make the very first thing I said about the pandemic. Is all of your authorities alighted, and what do we know now completely right? We completely right Oliver authorities relying too twas em? For exactly that reason, I told you that I suspect that they had another motive and sure enough I, who was one of the few

but who was one of the first people who told you that our authorities were fucking up by not closing travel to China sooner? Who told you that they were making their decision for purely political reasons instead of medical reasons me right a week before tromp said it, I said it very loudly screaming into the library there. I didn't trust our are authorities because making decision for apparently the wrong reasons. Son some kind of political considerations so, and I dont think that there has been any time when I've ever trusted, either the sites or the government.

so anybody who thinks that's a valid criticism of the most famous sceptic of management, literally thirty years of experience, tell you. The management is lying to you. That's what the Dilber Comic give us is tell you that you can't trust authority, as is my brand and by critics as I well your little to trusting of Authority Scott. Deep inside there about I've been promoting vaccinations. How many times I have to tell you: I don't care if you give actually it's a personal decision. You're you're risk profiles, not the same as mine, ass, the other thinking. Scott. You never mentioned the people have different risk profiles. Know I'm not sure that every fuckin day about a one one is it I fail to recognise the the things we learned by the swedish model.

And so somehow, I alone in the one person who doesn't understand that Sweden has taught us something. Let me teach you something: none of the country's tell us anything, none of them. There is no country. You can look at and say all look at their experience. So now we know what to do what works and what does it that doesn't it Just now, Sweden, not anywhere. We really dont, know why any country is doing anything. We see them going up and down independent of policy no, why everything is happening. So Sweden is just one of the countries that we don't understand why these things happening and said, That's your criticism, your criticism is that you don't understand that one country is experiencing doesn't mean anything. We can't tell anything from it. We think we can assist an illusion, and then this one somebody said on Youtube yesterday:

Scott spends nearly half of every podcast directing it. action to vaccines. Well, that's everybody! In the news he doesn't try to persuade against locked down or mask mandates that you would you say that I don't try to persuade against lot nouns, the new ones, and I don't try to persuade against mask mandates the mandate for censure. Well, it may be. That is true in terms of what I talk about the most that it has more to do with. What's more interesting, it's not what I'm trying to it's, not my worldview. It's just what's more interesting at the moment, so let me say it directly. Lockdowns look like a bad idea to me. Is that clear enough, lockdowns now and Ashley, anything stopping kids from going to school, and it looks like a bad idea to me.

is there any ambiguity that to me it looks like a really bad idea, and the reason is that When you get to the boy where everybody can have a vaccine, if they want, it is just freedom since the freedom question, let me for in context our we lose four hundred and eighty thousand people a year to cigarette smoking. Suddenly people die in the United States in one year from cigarettes. Four hundred and eighty thousand, as anybody ever complained about cigarettes, smokers hurting the capacity of emergency rooms now just built. If we just assume will be x, number of desperate year say a building capacity, they handles, maybe And is looking like this is a case where in a permanent pandemic, meaning there people don't want to be vaccinated, even people do is just go

your forever or the variant will or the next one will get out of the lab. Where a sort of permanent pandemic world, so Wouldn't have made more sense to expand our hospital resources so that we can handle the next pandemic. If not this one better. Maybe we have some way to quickly expanded Contract, so I think ass bills are going to have to evolve until it's just routine mean it might be routine surge like they. They now have a surge quickly for capacity that might be the only routine part buzz fight. That would work. So my opinion. is open everything, try to adjust the hospitals as well as you can you get freedom? You got people dying, but it was our choices, sir choices, so You think I am in favour of Loch bounds, you're very wrong. I was in favour lockdown for two weeks.

The first time we tried it. It was just an experiment and I thought that the cost benefit of at least finding out of it made. The difference was your party favourable, but that we found that it didn't. I didn't make a difference. Now we have no information on this forest mask mandates, game same problem, I dont think vaccinated people should have asked and because a vaccinated, I don't care if you were to ask whether you have actually ended up so could I be we're clear. The mask mandates are not only do I resist, but I actively recommend you resist them. The that my plan is to go into places that require masks, assuming that that gets implemented where I live. As now yeah, let's say, is close, but my plan is, do not wear a mask. replace the says you need a mask. But I have them asked me to leave or asked me to burn mass.

that I'm going to be polite and I'm going to do as asked either leave or put of the mask and I'm not going to make hard time for the employee cuz. It's not the employee's fault, I'm just going to make it a little bit more friction to do ordinary business. That's all his little friction and if other people do the same, then I think the mask mandates falls apart and it wouldn't take many of us. Maybe ten percent of us would be able take because employees would be suddenly all their time managing mask updates mandates, and then I want to do that. They will have an EU authority. They're gonna get and fights selvas miles. I mean nothing good about it. So is there anybody else whose tell you to resist and actually violate the guidelines? I don't tell to violate the guidelines directly in public. So that could not be more clear. Does anybody have any questions until you to violate the guidelines.

I I can't be more clear them. Our way. There's more pessimism on solving covert used to be wasn't long ago in June. I guess. Eighty nine percent of people said the pandemic was going in the right direction. We are getting out of it, but now only forty five percent say that and I think that's the right thing, meaning that it makes sense that the public doesn't think this is gonna end does at the moment it doesn't look like is ever give em. Doesn't it looks like we're Emily Perma debauch permanent pandemic, because if it's not this one is the next week. And it was not an ex variant as the virus, because this is the last fuckin thing this getting out of a lab right. Does everybody think well glad we?

ex their problem of viruses, getting labs, no, no it's got out again. We will have another, probably lots of them, so unfortunately we have to learn to live with them. So it makes sense that people are less optimistic. but there's question I have. This is a serious question. Given that we know here the things we know that the vaccination Apparently, lose effectiveness lot faster than we thought this new information. And we know that it seems that the most lasting protection would be actual infection But you don't want to get an actual infection because you might get long Cove into the Mykel you right, I mean it might kill you or you might get long, covid or both, So you don't want an affection under normal circumstances, but one if you know you're gonna get an infection and I feel like that's where we're at, but nobody saying directly from the government. I feel as if

We're all gonna get Covid, I don't see any way around it, given the current state of information because No, I have a vaccine. There would stop it. and we now have a way to really run a world without us getting together enough and travelling method of will all again it just on. And so, if we're all gonna get it here's my question shouldn't. We have a strategy that recognises the obvious, we're all going together or something has to be invented to stop it, which I not aware of anything like that. It's coming close. Rapid tests would always slow Adele. They do a good job of slowing down, but the Mamma you stop doing Europe a test to be re back where you were. It looks like I mean nobody can predict. That was certainly, but I think the rat. The tests would get you to just a slower infections.

Now you are slower, infections, are faster infections. It seems to me that my best personal strategy, which is different from a national strategy. Write what you do for yourself doesn't have to be exactly the same as what you might want for the country or other people to do my personal best thing I could do. I think I'm going to ask for a medical fact check on this cuz, I'm not a doctor. So don't listen. Medical staff, but given that I was recently vaccinate given. my age and co, more abilities and given the fact that I met the peak of my vaccines, effectiveness right now, shouldn't again infected intentionally. Because that's the safest way to meet for me to get the virus then I'm gonna get one where the other. If you only have choices, get the virus.

Near the safest or get it when you are the least safe? Why, when you get when you the safest now, that's a question, because, obviously, if you give yourself access to them as even with a vaccine. Could you get I'm covert, giving us a long term problem, I don't know, maybe as part of the risk, could the very innovation. Is self kill you yeah sure I mean maybe not likely, but could happen No, I guess what I don't understand is that the country doesnt have a strategy this coherent. If we have a plan to get rid of covered the great we don't know we, because we don't have a vaccine little do it. We don't have one another, on the way that will do it, there won't do it. We don't have a plan for just avoid. So if the only plan is that we're gonna get it shouldn't, they be telling you

the load up on therapeutics, if any of them work and to get you have actually vexing vaccination and get infected as soon as possible. Your government can't tell you to do that right. I've been telling you from the beginning that the government, granted some stuff, but one of the things they can't do is tell you to do something that could kill you. Unless you war is a war that can tell you to go to war and somebody you die. but for lifestyle stuff, the government just as to avoid killing people- that's that's it. They don't care about. Your freedom does not do any measure that they can be measured. how many people die, so the government doesn't have the right incentive relative to what the people want to be in charge. I've told me this before these citizens we are gonna- have to take control of the pandemic with the help of the government and science and all the information we get, but

You have to have the right people making the decision and at the moment the right people to make the decision are not the government, and I think that's rare, it's hard to think of other examples where the governments should not make your decision. They are. After all, elected representatives is another topic elected but I think we just have to acknowledge the obvious less acknowledge the obvious. The citizen should be in charge of this decision. and if Joe Biden just took a pole, look the governor, doesn't quite have the right structure for this decision underscore look at the polls. If you guys, if you guys, people and all of you days, if you, if you want to go back to work and you wanna, take the risk because you at least have the option of the vaccine or support them, and just let the public aside.

Have we ever done before, as the government of the United States ever said? Look it really so depends what the public wants. That's gonna be the biggest variable. So just tell me what you want and on this question I am, follow the bowls of follow the science also. But if the, if the Public knows the science as well as I do knows the risks and reward, maybe just let the people decide I think, there's something called a trump curse. Gus Cathy Griffin tragically got lung cancer and she doesn't even smoke. I guess he was addicted to pills after the Trump beheading scandal, and I guess she attempt attempted suicide That's telling me I need to leave in. It seems to me that everybody, user Trump critic and even people The biggest supporters have some horrible thing happened to them like a lot.

So I'm just following that nets, tragic and algae. She does well about this about, we put a warning on on vaccinated status. The way would put a warning on cigarettes. Cigarettes are legal and I kill. Half a million people a year are we do the same with government? If it's here to stay, and just say this here, example of this is a persuasion example. Not I'm not tell you to take the vaccination, that's up to you, but if you want to persuade people You could put a cigarette warning on. It says something like not getting better made substantially increases the risk of dying, a gruesome death gasping for air with stuck doctor, you're trachea. About just by warning I'll say: look we're gonna, open, open everything, no masks, no lockdown, but look.

Public. I want you to know how clearly I'm gonna tell you the risk this. Let's say this: is the government essay Joe Biden? Do this I'm gonna get rid of all the restrictions at a national level and I'm gonna put this warning label on it. If you don't get the vaccination, There is a really good chance, I mean put some Amazon there's a chance of dying, a gruesome death gasping for air, with a trade with a ventilator stuck down your throat. It's not fair. Would anybody say that that warning is not accurate? you mean you don't say everybody doesn't happened, everybody, but it's a risk, now, you might also say getting the vaccination as a risk right but say that too. but the government inform us and will make their own decisions about that.

Here's your fake news of the day, clay, Travis tweeted this! He said Joe Biden, stop covert adviser. Just women. Cnn admitted the masks. People are wearing, don't work against covert, so that was the tweet from Clay Travis. But there's True, the the video he showed Despite an adviser, go revisers saying that the mass don't work as well as other masks. So network as well as other mask is completely different from don't work, so that would be fingers like that is all I had to say today, except that the be funny to see us the IQ in America changes after the pandemic, because I think you will agree

this statement is either true that the smart people are getting vaccinated or it's true that the smart people are not getting vaccinated. Would you agree that one of those two things is probably true right now, you all you all say You know, which way is gonna go, but let's just for this conversation say could go either way. Wouldn't you like to know if the average iq goes up or down the way average lifespan did because a pandemic, because if the smartest people are making the right decisions, they should be. The iq should go up, because a more smart people surviving in dumb people are dying, but what? If it's the other way around? What? If the iq goes down, because the smart people took the vat

the nation and all died? I don't think that's gonna happen by them, but what but good right anything is possible. So what would happen if all the smart people made the wrong decision on this? What are the odds pretty good? the US and all the smartest people made the wrong decision pretty good. So what did you say? The odds are pretty good. That's all I got Now I gotta run I'll talk to you later.