Well good more good morning, everybody it's time to get your attitude adjusted cause. You know something The news is not so good, but luckily I'm here to cheer you up that all those things little dose of better attitude, get that they go and if a lecture you about vaccines, you're gonna, go, don't worry, there will be no lecture you about vaccines, indeed, indeed Aubrey arguing that you don't have a cause. You do have a constitutional right boy them, so you can like up on the way forward are before you go and it's time for the simultaneous the best thing that ever happened in the history of the universe.

and all you need is a copper, buggered, lesser tankard chelles, there's time nicotine juggler flask of vessel very kind to me, the favor look and I like coffee jointly net. For the unparalleled pleasure, the don't win him the day thing makes some man everything better. Just everything scale, the simultaneous it's gonna happen now watch it go. Well, I don't know if you know this, but there have been randomize controlled trials and is proven that people who are trained in the simultaneous sip have a better day. Then the people who didn't even the people who took horse de warmer instead no didn't help them Coffee did coffee did well Alyssum Olano. You know her famous actress and supporter of Joe Biden.

well. I'm gonna give her the gaseous tweet of the of the century award and she treated this yesterday and I am not making this up. This really happened So illicit mulatto tweeted yesterday, I'm proud of protest and the incredible job is doing- is the right person for the job and this moment in history hashtag. I stand with Biden now I got questions questions is also mulatto. The only person in the universe who has noticed that there is kind of a big mistake, Joe Biden made recently in maybe a still making. We don't know she's cheese, proud of him.

She's proud of the job is done and says he's the right person for this for the job. In this moment, industry- and this raises an interesting question- What would it look like if the worst person from the job that it well with the worst person for the job do the worst person probably give names of people that are trying to escape from the Taliban to the Taliban. I'll be back? I think the worse person would do that. Maybe maybe, when the Taliban offered America all of Taliban to control until the until evacuations were over, maybe the worst person in the world was.

We don't need. All of all we need is a little airport, we'll just we'll just we just need the airport, that's sort, something that the worst person in the world might have said. Anybody else was at here, you know better perimeter would be smarter, was will control to boil until we're done. That's what to tell been walk for them. They turned it down what so. Thank goodness we do. Have the worst person for the job here is news. I consider fake news until somebody process not and and by the way they they giving the names of the Taliban.

These were special cases involved like a bus here there, but it's still a real problem. It wasn't all the names of all the people, but still pretty bad, although to be fair, they don't have many options. So the faint news is that Chase Bank closed general flints account there because they didn't want to associate with his reputation or risk. Do you believe? That's true? I saw this and social media, but I did not see it in news. Doesnt seem true. I was eight this is a little bit too too on the nose right. I'm saying Richard says his shoe. Other people saying is true here.

here's what I would look for. I would always think this is true. If it came from general flints twitter account if General Flint, we do this. Well, it's true. If, if he's the only person who didn t or let's say you didn't we lose it all religious dimension, it is natural, so he says it's his own telegram or twitter abandoned was less a less aid comes from his account, though some other account. So I would

say that I'm gonna call this fake news unless I heard it from from him from Flynn. If somebody has something on social media, they came from Flynn that you actually did a screenshot yourself, not a screenshot. You saw, but is so you took yourself up on social media of Flynn confirming then all believe it is rather too. I don't trust his brother. I wouldn't trust his brother. I would trust only Flynn, any other source doesn't count, but but by the way, Richard dollars. More proof discuss a right wing shill. You, I'm gonna, put you in time out, because I hide you dick literally. His name is Dick, so Dick here in time out now,

So what else we got here? I love the daily CNN, anecdotal persuasion. So, as you know, see an industry, to give you one story per day of some: who wishes I got. The vaccine is showing they got vaccinated and there. One day forever until yellow give vaccinated. I guess So this one was a woman. Hospitalized with covered comes home, to find her husband, died from it She was in the hospital and another husband was literally home watching the pets and he died of watches now spoke now, there's no direct mention of whether they were vaccinated, but they were vaccinated. I don't think so this. This is a restore you gonna, your lot of now say you should be persuaded by this. In fact, I'm saying the opposite: you should not be persuaded by

don't individual stories of something that happened to a person. If that's was persuaded, you you're doing wrong, but the truth is. That is precisely what we do get persuaded by these all stories: ears the one Florida radio host Mark Bernier Sixty five who disturbingly called himself, Mr Anti Vex. So there's a conservative Florida Florida makes it s a story. Our interest in Florida, radios Conservative called himself, MR, Dr acts, can you finish them? so the story, without even knowing what it is So there was an old order sixty five call themselves Mr Antonio vaccines quite proud of it. How do you think the story ends? That's right. He died, didn't give vaccinated any died of gold now in new those,

to be the end of the story right because the does its anecdotal persuasion and if the story has that little twist, he he was and I have asked and andy- you died. Yes, you're right and re. Sixty five is not old. I correct I correct myself. but certainly in terms of covered it, sir, within the risk category, is the beginning of the risk categories, and he's this third broadcaster today from covered. I think they mean the third conservative one right the third one who said, don't get a vaccination and then he died because you didn't get a vaccination at it, the other closer to sixty five, the less old it seems. I tell you if I thought that saw I'm sixty four. If, if I knew the being sixty four felt the way it feels now,

everyone had been afraid of it to the hills. Pretty good you gotta say I'm probably is healthy, is ever been in my whole life. But the story about the Mark Bernay who tragically died after Brandon himself. Mr aunt, I've acts type a story that tells you a lot about yourself doesn't What was your reaction to the story, about somebody who is anti vaccine than died, because he didn't get a vaccine, a kind of worm used. Some of you are, some of you were maybe at a more human reaction. I just thought it was tragic and at the end of it, but I to tell you. I was a little bit entertained and thus, something really bad about me. Doesn't how many, if you have the same reaction and found out that you suck just like, I did

I found out I'm a bad person cause it kind of entertain me and that's really bad. I'm being honest now I must say that I proud of it, because it's not really reaction you should be proud of, but I suck. It is a tragedy and I feel so. I feel bad for the family, but reason it was on the news, as somebody thought I would be entertained by it and they were right side by the way. I don't care if you get a vaccination, so it's not about. There is more work for use as a human being, and I guess

Do so I like to say again that there are two positions on I respect and which would reveal you to be not part of reason said this before and I have to say it again if your positive that it has been proven that I've respecting works, as happened so you're, not really part of reason, if you think that happen, but if your positive, it doesn't work, and that is just horse de warmer and it can possibly work well apart or reason bury them plenty of evidence. There just isn't proof and we get those to confuse right there's. No, I was would agree that there is no proof that I reject it works but there's a tunnel.

suspicious, looking evidence. So, if you're not uncertain about, I remarked and you're in the wrong place, I saw a graph today's of apes. I think those a J Cortez sent this graph unto her. The showing that the african countries used over MAC a very low death rage from covered, whereas the african countries that do not use it so much much higher, much much higher death rates. So that's all you need to know right. If the countries in Africa that used it are doing relatively great and the ones I didn't use it, doing relatively Saki. So you need to know now is not about vitamin D. It's not about sunlight gazettes, Africa, only looking at Africa. They got lost Vitamin D. They got the of sunlight so If it's only african countries

and the ones using I remained great and the ones who don't use it same as everybody else not using it does not tell you something. Are you convinced? Are you convinced now wait a minute we them what would be may be wrong. What would we, may be wrong with the data just top after Talleyrand. What do you think could be wrong with the data about everything about their breathing? What what would the countries that use I've remarked and in Africa have in common with each other, and there would be the acts and the countries who are not using Iver Maxim? what what were the users of ivory acted in Africa have in common wealth somebody says malaria, maybe more developed and less to them

the more developed the country is, the less likely they use, and I respect what else? would be a correlation, the more developed you are better. You, health scares. What would be another correlation? Another correlation would be you count your dead correctly. you think that a country that has to use- I remember him, cause I don't have good health care to do anything else. Do you think that country is counting their desk correctly? Now, there's a off there's, probably a perfect correlation or a really strong one. I would guess not perfect brothers volley a perfect correlation issue between countries. They can't count. They're dead Don't don't know who died at home if who didn't and ones that don't have enough healthcare to do anything but use over me so I'm not so. Thus escalation, I'm saying is,

a more of biased explanation than I ever met in really works, and all the experts and the other countries to notice So compare the two possibilities think my bird has visited me. No actual human, MR that does my scary camera deepening soap, so to take these two possibilities is the past. What is a greater possibility that the effort- can study has good data. And this shows that I've reacting works? All of the industrial countries around the world haven't noticed or don't believe it said that likely could be. It could battles are rule that out is perfectly possible that there is data showing it works in Africa that not convincing to people or exports, maybe maybe, as even accurate.

Was the other possibility possibility. Is that this exactly the countries who are not good accounting, they're dead and that's the whole thing could be the whole thing, so I wouldn't believe any graph about. I remember nor about one country can bear to another. Every time you do the. every time you do that kind of comparison is misleading. I think I am Alex barons and who, as you know, was sceptical of many things the government was doing about this pandemic got banned by twitter, And I was really nautical Israel. Israel is not too happy with them, so harlots big is really publication was mocking him, takes on Israel and apparently was claiming that the vaccinations weren't working too well in Israel.

So that this is an article and harassed This is their claim, I'm just passing along and the claim is that Alex burdensome were saying that the vaccinations warrant working in Israel, this initial flavors of wages working there wasn't keeping anybody from dying but once the data was overwhelmingly showing that that was true, apparel. He changed his attack do well, they might be presenting some covered, but what about these side effects? They started talking about the side effects instead of the effect that should be your first flag right. The summit moving from their one criticism and immediately goes to another. criticism. So that's what talk about words out about the the people who brand themselves as the health of the people oh see, other people were on the other side of everything. What you're, always on the other side of everything you don't have. Any credibility

now that does me wrong? I'll say this a million times? If any comes back to be leaders as Alex Birds and was right and you wrong, I'm going to say so I always allowed that that's possible. It is one hundred percent possible though- and this is also done- Alex Barons and we'll be right about everything completely basel- I don't think so. I bet against it and I bet I bet heavily against it. We care will now based- While we know that at the moment does any any data using does has disproved him, or data's grab a measure. Anybody, disprove anybody these days. let's talk about your constitutional right

CNN said that you do not have a constitutional right to avoid a vaccination? What do you think? Do you think you have a constitutional right to avoid a mandatory of acts mandatory mandatory that vaccination So the argument is their other, vaccines that are mandatory and those of past constitutional muster so, for example, we ll have to get a polio vaccination right. I think that's one of the examples and its mandatory is mandatory. So doesn't that proves that there is nowhere, there's no constitutional right for it. While here's the thing, if you don't get the polio vaccination or is there could be a vaccinations in this example, but I'll just use boy you would be putting our fellow citizens are risk. We all agree on that right,

You don't give vaccinated at least that's what medical science is tell you that you would be putting other people are risk. Do you have a constitutional right should be seen as an argument which argue against at the moment they have a constitutional right to put other people, arrests well fairly doubt because, if you are freedom, put somebody else at risk. That's where you freedom and right so do you have the freedom to go? Take a crap and somebody's living room. You do not, because that would have an impact on somebody else. so your freedom generally is limited when the stars having a big enough impact on other people,

We will have to deal with our smaller impacts on other people cause there's no way to prevent them, but when it's the big stuff, such as life and death yeah, then your freedom is probably going to be limited by what what you're doing to other people you have drunk driving would be an example right. So I agree with the argument that the government can force you to do things you didn't want to do if it's good for other people. I see you're gonna just right, but here is here, is my take on it. What, if You genuine believe in genuinely believe it would be dangerous to you now. I can Remember everything by self hey. If I get is polio back

nations. Rather I don't remember every thinking that it would kill me like. I was never afraid of it because I shall like it was tested enough, even if it wasn't was, I feel like it was dangerous. But what, if you feel like. Whether you're right or wrong, whether what have you she'll like the vaccination would be dangerous to you. That's different These vaccinations are not analogous to other vaccinations, because with the other vaccinations. You did have a feel, a fairly good feeling that they ve been tested well enough. They weren't that unique and that there were working against something. Were vaccination works here? We are case where the vaccination works issue, but it still doesn't stop a cold and because as newer a little?

less tested and biotechnology there is some extra concern. So here is my constitutional argument and it goes like this. Yes, the government can force you to do something with your body that, you didn't do if there is not much danger to you in it and it would save other people's lives I take. That is constitutionally solid. I think the government can force you to, protect other citizens. If there's not really much of arrest you, but why as the government and you have a very different opinions about the level of risk. What do you think the risk is unacceptably high, even if it isn't

And what is the government says now? It's is low enough. Well, here's the problem. The government doesn't have the right to make you harm yourself in your opinion, does it can the government make you harm yourself in your opinion, on Thursday, What are you saying that, if, as your opinion that it would harm you, can they make you do that? Because it s really apply to? Like the other vaccinations too much right? You can most people are too afraid of those. I know the ant I've axes are, but it isn't as big a deal assesses anyway. I think the constitutional argument that the government can you do it doesn't apply to this. So that's my taken the constitutionally. Well, apparently, North Korea is firing up another nuclear well nuclear reactor that they already had.

the firing a back up and its capable of producing weapons grade plutonium. We think airs questioned why this has happened under tromp. Now I probably would be. Does I imagine that they need electricity as much as they leave to make bombs, but its being noted that is made binding, negotiate and that's really just to get us back to the negotiating table. But what exactly are we negotiating about? Does North Korea need anything I mean? Are we negotiated with my my best guess is that they privileges needed electricity, and this is highly gathered so I feel as though we would be safer under tromp, because even if Trump didn't like this he'd, probably at least ever friendlier interaction with them, which would make Sol safer. I don't I'm gonna do throughout what good, secondly,

here is another dog. This not barking. where's my anonymous reports about all the generals, privately disagreeing with by about the Afghanistan withdrawal where's that are you telling me you can produce one anonymous story: numerously source the story about the conversation in the room when the decisions were being made. I know it feels like there's something missing here right, because don't you think that if Trump were president, have anonymous stories that the general said clearly do not this, Mr President, and then the president in his in his orange badness.

decided to do it anyway for political or financial gain right. That's the story right. If Trump has been, president you'd have all these anonymous reports where he was just being dumb and he said all the right things and he was racist and thought it would be true. It wouldn't be true, but it would definitely exist. Those stories would be there and you can. You can see now that only that kind of story gets invented by the left more than the right, because if the news on the right invented bullshit stories as as much as the laughed at least in this category of stories, you'd already see it. Somebody would be reporting on all of us oars try detail by not to do it,

He just wouldn't listen. I, like your web and behind closed doors. The news is suspiciously not telling us, while Rasmussen did Poland s people about what they thought about violence, performance and the withdrawal of Afghanistan. You would not be surprised that fifty two percent of respondents said it was poor, poor It's a surprising part. Thirty, two percent of likely voters in this Rasmussen ball think that the binding job and withdrawing from left and was either good or excellent. One third of the public, the voting public, not even the people, were paying attention. The voting public, the people pay attention, work,

more than other people, a third of the voting public things. Things Biden didn't ok job, withdraw what There is not even a single new source with that story. There is not one news outlets saying he did this right, not the less, not the right, not the middle of the middle exists anywhere. I don't what the hell is cargo? Are the Democrats so dug in or that are they going illicit mulatto? Is this cognitive? Dissonance is a confirmation? By is what is this we seriously you expect you accept some kind of a split like this when the sides disagree is the new

reporting differently on the right and the left about who did well or who dimmed. Well, then you'd have a split popular, but what happens when the news on the left and the right both know that Biden blew it and their completely consistent. I don't blame you, there's anybody going on the news on any outlet say well, this look pretty good to me. I think so, how in the world do thirty two percent say love it's good as a good job. Well, yes, gay, blaming and untroubled. Some might be blaming it on Trump. That could be. Some might be saying you know it doesn't matter how we get our just get it. Maybe. some might be saying: well, Scooby messy, no matter what you do, it would have the mercy of John did it. Do maybe maybe, but I dont know how can I there's not going portal

You could argue that may be able to go and poorly no matter who did it, but you can't are yours now going poorly now levy? Let me throw a compliment to forget, when Biden said, we are going to get out by this date that the Taliban set most the reporting on the left and the right said. That's a big mistake because a measure we can make that happen and the people who were below by in the administration or saying it's not gonna happen so like a big mistake right now now, if Trump In the same thing, I would be supporting him the same way. It goes like this Biden is talking to the Taliban, and he's trying to treat them as respected partners at least long enough to get our people out, what he says after we get our people, our might be different, but at the moment,

Biden an essay. He will respect the deadlines because he's respecting their their right to put in and here's the second part I've seen this management a million times. The sea I will say I knew this in two weeks and all the underlying say you can't do this in two weeks. This will take a month Norman What, then, the sea, oh says yeah, but you can do in two weeks and then the other Alexei, say I don't think you're. This cannot be done in two weeks, and then the CEO says do in two weeks and then they go do it in two weeks. So, it looks like binder that looks like everybody that is impossible, play Biden said: do it anyway and I think he's going to get pretty close. at least in terms of the people we can get out now. The problem is there, people who keg the airport right be stragglers forever.

I am not convinced we won't have some kind of a system to get them out. I think it'll be a bunch of different efforts. I think we'll have to peck aware that for a long time, maybe privately people will do some things as well as government stuff other. This will help us etc, but at least in that narrow sense of Biden sticking to the deadline, I think he probably made the right choice and that, even though it look stupid, persuasion, wise negotiations wise and managing the Talibans attitude which matters, because we care guard atoms while we still need it. So I think he might have the deadline thing by the right move or the only movie could make, I'm saying sort of wretched tweets about the missile attack those. So there was a second response. I guess. the? U S did a missile attacks or a Jones Reich whatever it was on a

Kabul neighbourhood that allegedly killed something like sixty nine people, maybe twenty fog of war. We know now there were children among the dead logically, we don't know that for sure either. Although the photographs wisdom that the record photographs And I guess we, the? U S is not confirmed who who was or was not killed, but were secondary explosions, so I guess they target a car or a vehicle. That allegedly Adsum suicide attackers, but the explosion caused secondary explosions, and I guess a building glue Now that doesn't necessarily mean that door, explosives and the building but has indicated that might have been so did you notice, there's not much news, So I saw the the cernovich tweets and I thought to myself my god. That's a big story

and then I went to the news to check on the story. Is. Was being ignored in american media see then has one minor headline on it and then headline doesn't even refer to it directly like you have to get into the storage to find that even happened. So they're doubtfully underplayed CNN is underplay the hell out of this, and I have to read about it in foreign press I had to read about it in the guardian had to read about it in Al Jazeera, and I had to read about it in spectator. What country is a spectator out in and what country that is is that America is MAX's cover UK spectators, UK.

Well, there's something disturbing about how well this is being hidden from american public. In fact, if I hadn't concern of riches tweets. I don't even think I would have noticed because it was so silent and deadlines that I actually wanted noticed. So somebody says, is on CNN

So is it on the network, because the the news page on the web is just one little mention of it in this mentioned, but it looks underplayed, and maybe you should be because I have mixed feelings about the civilian casualties and war. If you're targeting terrorists, amusing, yo, you you have to make horrible choices, and I tend to be fairly forgiving for the people who have to make horrible choices. Is war people die its tragic and there's just nothing? This can change that well you're, something interesting. There has been one death from the Pfizer vaccine itself. Maybe so it confirmed that the vaccination causes one death boasts a new Zealand which I find interesting Cosette

numbers yet, but New Zealand is obviously doing vaccinations, but what makes them unique is that their there are closed up tight from the virus. South Sudan one case and they closed the clothes, the country down again right for one case. So what makes New Zealand interesting is that if there are vaccination, complications, We should be able to see them more cleanly and New Zealand than anywhere else right, because you won't be seeing any corona virus DAS, so they should have zero deaths and then in theory they would have. Pretty good visibility on how many people the vaccinations kill. Now there one case that it looks like yes, is highly likely because it was a mile card data is involved. I guess that's the telephone, the vaccinations being the

problem, but leave their work or morbid entities involved, and it's not so clear. Maybe the vaccine was part of it. If it wasn't, but I keep an eye on New Zealand vaccination related deaths. We do believe that there are many of them wherever there are will be highlighted there now again, if you going to turn it off, because I mention vaccines, I'm not promoting it. I'll just tell you where the word we might have some day and then Leslie. Lastly, that was lastly like to get to all the notes. On my followed last page, there aren't any printed empty page,

Yeah one death can never be clear. That is, that is correct. You probably would need some number of deaths to get some kind of statistical confidence, but yet want one death can never really tell you everything. But it would tell you something if there were so few of them, though you couldn't tell him if if, get to the end of this, and we have one possible death in New Zealand for vaccinations because remember this is a national story. It means is the first one. I think. Maybe we just don't know that than the others.

But, if you really want how many people in New Zealand have gotten a vaccination millions, would you say that millions have been vaccinated, New Zealand, so far, probably say Scott pretends Alex doesn't exist. Sad you talk about Alex Jones, I dont Britain's. He doesn't exist. Adela Michel, I like illustrates that does mean he's right about everything, but I say that about everybody, but if you want to have said this before, if you can't compliments, somebody disagree on Venetian checked herself for bias. So I don't agree, of course,

with everything that Alex Joan says, but he's a nice guy. I like him very kind to me very generous when I interactive and very likeable and obviously very successful, so any report Lisbon right about a number of things, so so I have some good things to say about that. yes, they have of the U N Climate summit. I'm saying in the common reminded me blocked the nuclear energy from attending.

There's a you and some are about the climate, the climate and they decided that it would be appropriate to have the nuclear industry. There I remind you. The nuclear industry is probably the only hope we have of changing anything about climate change as well as controlling space someday seal. We hope we have now. Maybe Somebody'Ll invent something That's a new hope, but at the moment is the only hope we have for water, dsl innovation, which will be required and electricity. This dependable, it's our only hope and the U S is guided exclude those people on upsets Scott, take a vacation for everyone. Well, maybe I'll do that, but it won't stop me from lives to be on vague

vision. When you put the money filter on everything, looks different, so follow the money that probably has something to do with the nuclear industry being frozen. yes, I've, I'm gonna run and I will see you tomorrow talk to them