A very warm welcome to copy was gardens which you get here, because I've gotta turn on your soon I'll bet, you're all yellow where's. My sound where's, my sound, is what you said about now about ass. Well, if you are on Youtube, you said yourself, I hope your sound, and now you do it and if you like to enjoy today to the maximum potential and I'm talking about the maximum, don't settle for anything less than the maximum from the sidelines. Some of you say, you know I'll just take the minimum. No, no don't be that person take the maximum and all you need for the maximum is a copper, Magua, glass or

take your jewels as I began to injure the landscape vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. Like and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure that double meaning the day. The thing that makes everything better except the Arizona ought it is called the simultaneous and watch it go to work right now go I feel, data improving everywhere. Well, let's look at our stories. Shall we look at our stories today? you know some days you wake up. If you do this, what I do with these lives dreams you look of the news and you say to yourself: oh god, making do with us lose. This news is not naturally interesting, but Sundays. The news is naturally interesting today as well.

Those days, but first of update on my kept the most important story in the world, but the cat had surgery yesterday through movie polyp from her ear area that was causing are all kinds but And it looks like a certain surgery was a success is recovering. I hoped to get her back today, but I'll, let you know that's the most important story the day. The second most important thing this happening is that my notes in over there There we go so I just saw tweet before I get about night. condensation technology Apparently there some kind, a giant sheet you can put suspended over your crops and there's something about the technology of this big surface. they collect all the moisture in a way that the ground itself dozen collected, say. Eighty percent moors on

night after the moisture collected linkages, release and under the crops, so they can basically water the crops without rain. now I dont know how stable this big. She like looking thing is, it looks like the wind would blow it all hell, but it does tell us that there is some kind of technology there that might have some some promise, maybe maybe not that exact one. but we might be able to water crops without water, released without rain and without groundwater sprinkle Rasmussen at a ball and asked about the four points. Six billion dollars proposed to pay for the afghan refugees to resettle in the United States. How many citizens of the United States think it's a good idea to pay for these afghan refugees to settle? Well? Fifty six percent said no. We do not want to spend four point: six billion dollars; thirty two percent

Yes, it's an interesting moral dilemma. Isn't it because if you asked and we get our allies out of Afghanistan, people who helped us during the war efforts. I think a vast majority of people say: you gotta, let your allies out. But what good is that new ones it once they get out? They ve got enough. Where are they going somebody's going to have to help them? If it? If we're going to take them out of their country, we broke it, then we buy it. So that's the question we broke it and we broke the country and we broke their ability to live in it. So we broke it. Did we buy it? Oh no, it's assiduous in question, but I would think that we have some obligation. You could argue about the price tag. You can say them. It costs too much. Everything costs too much, but I feel, like

You have some obligation that some amount of that expense we need to eat since the question, how much Well, Chris Cuomo is in trouble. His old boss. Elsa story from twenty years ago, so why? When we work for ABC allegedly at some party get together of employees and their spouses? He came in and he had just change jobs, so he is his boss was now just recently as exports. A woman. Allegedly gave her a big bear. Ugh the walls. Are you here? You soundly grabbed her ass Jake and said I can do this now because you're, not my boss. Where are we, work together. Some like that, some paraphrasing, but basically said I can do this now, because we have worked together. apparently, is all boss corrected his data?

No, actually this may come as a surprise. Do you hear on paraphrasing again this is not an exact words, but could about No no Chris, I would like to tell you that is fake news should insanity this, but I think she should have no no precise figures? The fact that you don't work for me or with me does not make it. Ok, to grab my ass in public. Now I know you thinking he grabbed her ass, Jake and you're. All thinking the same thing. Why doesn't she just turn the other cheek? What you were thinking that. Some of you were well. Apparently that was not called for in this particular situation. Buddy She did step aside after this encounter, you show Chris Cuomo that her husband was sitting

Behind her, that's right, Chris Squirrel. grabbed a married woman, ass right in front of her husband didn't know the thousand was sitting right behind her now. What is the most shocking part of the story?. That crisscrossed alive right look out of husband says their watches his wife's ask a grabbed by Chris Cuomo, and that there is no part of the story where a fight broke out. Chris. It was a pretty big guy right. I mean, if we're being honest and I'll, think you'd want to get the fight with Chris Global. He's got some big guns. There are notoriously looks very big I think you'd want to give the fight with Chris Global, but even I would have taken a run out I like half his eyes,

but even I would have taken a wrong. I mean my god. My aspect will be worth it is relevant here, whose husband, who wouldn't take a rather am I mean the very the minimum the minimum, I would have got his kick him out. I would have just pushed him toward the door. You know they even in my size, I could have got that done. I just kept pushing him toward the door. If you punch me, he's got trouble, Otherwise, I'm just gonna put out the door and you make sure he falls down when I push on the last night, but you have to give physical in that case, don't you don't you have a bunch of. Maybe I don't want to go to jail. You don't want to cause a scene. You don't want. You know what ruin your wife's career? but your wife just made you look like the biggest pussy in the whole fucking world, so

I would like to nominate her for worst wife in the world, although there are some argument that maybe the husband wasn't so cool either. If you didn't do anything in this situation,. but everything about this is wrong: Nobody in this story came out. Well, did they so Chris Cuomo expanded story? That being the point in the story? the woman who talks about it, looks like a horrible badge cuz she just through her husband under Boston identity. They happen and her husband's Gus of explaining do likewise. part of the story where a fire broke out like where's that, Oh, maybe the husband played it right cause. One can imagine that the wife would prefer. There was not a fight. as is the wife's careers her life, maybe she prefers a you did not defender in that particular situation.

Nobody came out good in this story now will risk or will be for. To reside or anything because this this one is a tough one I normally employ what I call the twenty year rule. If you did something twenty years ago, especially this verbal. Let it go, but I have also said you can't do that of his murder is a violent rape or something you're, not gonna, forgive it. Desgas was twenty years ago, and this one's sort of in a grey area you forgive this one. Do you say well that was twenty years ago I don't know, I think you the go either way on this one but if you wanted to be supportive of women in general, you would go the way of it needs to step down our worst wife ever.

The sword getting reports today, I know you won't talk. Feathers souci report is there's a leaked draft, not the final report. Just a leaked dress, of what later apparently will be released today of the Arizona audit findings allegedly- and this has been confirmed by the County- all right. So although it's a draft and although it's a leak, those two things normally mean not very credible. The county, which does know what the real answer is. The county says the draft is a: So at the moment, we believe that the Arizona audit found not only found no fraud that word route, reverse it, but actually found the Biden won by a few hundred votes more than they thought now. What's the first thing, you think when we hear that first of all

we don't know that this will stand a guy. Can we all? I know before you jump on me? Can we all agree that were in the fog of war Whatever has been reported now is deeply unlikely to be the same thing you think by the end of today are going to save page. Does anybody think that whatever it is that we think we know today will be the same thing we think we know at the end of today? Probably not right, I don't think so. now I'm seeing in the comments, let me address I see somebody some people saying that the releasing the draft report is spin and getting out of the story. How many of you think that there was happening here is that somebody is trying to get ahead of the story, because the real a story with the details might be more damning.

somebody tried to get ahead of it and like get that in your mind, so that it doesn't so you can't be moved from it when the real facts come out. Do you think so? Here's why, I think not ready it's too close to the actual release If your plan is to inoculate people with a fake story, you want to have more time. So if it doesn't intentional plan to get a fake story out there to spin it has certain ways of the real story. Couldn't effect that much you would do a much earlier. You wouldn't know the same day right now. I suppose if he were desperate- and you are good at this- you might do it the same day yoke as we got an old sailor, Maybe- but this doesn't look like any kind of a professional spin job- the professionals would have done it much sooner. That's where all the better this is the Sudanese that gives it the power, because it sinks in right,

But if you just heard hey, there's something about the Arizona, water and then a few hours later, you got the correction, I don't know if it ever sunken, so it doesn't look like a professional propaganda. Job couldn't be an unprofessional. One could be somebody's taken. A wacko They don't have to do it very well, maybe, but I would say that it does not happen now. I prediction was that the audit would not turn up irregularities. Based on me, knowing anything about the election. It was based on the fact that we would have leak much sooner. If they had found the goods it would have led one soon, so I alone, among my audience, predicted, maybe there's somebody else here. but I think I alone predicted that whether or not there is fraud. That's a separate question that the auto wouldn't find it.

Two reasons they won't find it they're not looking in the right place and if they found something we would have heard it through the leak. If you can't keep that a secret, Nobody could keep a secret risen, the chance in the world than if they had the goods. We would not have known about it a month ago, just no chance, statistically their subjects, but the very, very low. So could I still be wrong. Everybody. Listen to this next part because you get us where I didn't say this. Guy listen carefully those export. I can totally wrong. If you can't say that about everything that you believe statistically duty likely You're not really thinking you're, just punishing so if you're thinking

did you say I can be totally wrong. Others by the today- everything I believe to be true- could be reversed, and I wouldn't be that surprised. But I'm giving you my prediction based on a specific criteria, which is, it would have leaked if they had the goods. Now here is the question. there are two ways to regular election. Broadly speaking, right, too is one would be to put in fake votes, which seems the hard and also likely to be caught. So one way to do it, put in fake votes, but sky too hard. Well, maybe it's not hard to put a man, but the odds of getting away with it, not so good cause. You fine shake boats? The second way to do it is to throw away votes that are real once, but you throw away just the ones that will change the election. The way you want, how do you detect thrown away votes?

Does, in order to find a vote that that that they didn't get? How do you count the vote that isn't there. That was our assembly in charge of missing votes. So ok, here's Sing vote. That's one hears a handicap missing votes Can't count what isn't there right and Presumably there would have been thrown away long before they reached the point place there would have been picked up and thrown away by operate. Is the post office one I ve been done by by areas where you knew there were a lot of talk. Voters, for example. Now Did the Arizona or it also do polling to find out if people who thought they voted really dead,

I don't know I understand the somebody was due in that kind of work. Some can was doing that kind of Poland, but I don't know if that's the subjective. Whatever this draft, Portas? So here's what I would expect further by the end of today. I would expect that the audit didn't find anything but being bought. Yours, a big butts, and I'm not talking about the one that Chris Cuomo grabbed know it's a big but but not that one. Actually, I don't know how bigger bud was but sounds funny. I don't regret the big body as I believe that by the end of the day, we will have an argument that the Arizona audit couldn't look at the things that needed to look at, for example, it couldn't get into these software in hardware, couldn't determine that there was a chain of custody. In some cases they couldn't determine if any votes have been.

Discarded. So I think that is going to move towards this. As the things we can check, look good, the things that we can check. We now know so I think you're too, movies will be intact at the end of today, too, One says the Arizona what I found: no fraud, it is done and the other. Found lots of ways could have been fraud, but they didn't know check. Now. Here's my next question this one's fuck. This was really fun to me say if you think this is funny. The auditors, these and Ninja What are they called? cyber ninjas, which is a terrible name for election on auditing company

Cyber ninjas doesn't even really sound that credible. Does it, but didn't we not spend months listening to the left, tell us that the cyber ninjas could not do this work and that they were not credible and then the cyber ninjas did the work and came to the conclusion. That Biden made bad more votes than anybody thought. Does somebody o cyber ninjas a really big apology, because today we see this covered? I'm not sure I saw this coming, I mean I didn't make her prediction one way or another but what I didn't see is cycle Changes would be so credible that they have more votes for abiden and then just report reported it that way yeah and everybody's going to believe them now that it's the greatest now that the left is getting an answer that they like, or we think it's too early to know that for sure

well, it looks like I gotta get an answer they like There is a well that want. It was pretty credible. It's a good thing. Cyber ninjas top shelf. If you want to know for sure whether you have any fraud called a cyber ninjas because I'll get you the right answer Rita, so cyber ninjas, one from the least credible or organization in the world to the most top of the best auditors of all time. So that will be again just two movies will emerge as we know two of the biggest problems in the world go solve this week and I think that's pretty good news. As you know, climate change is largely solved. Or at least now we have a plan to solve it in actual useful functional blocks.

because, as you know, Jennifer Gran, the Secretary of Energy, said for the by administration. They love of nuclear energy in its necessary solution to the climate, and even if you don't think, there's a climate problem. I know we have some doubters watching today, even if you didn't believe that you still the nuclear energy, because you need a lot of energy and needs to be cheap and we need it for space, we needed for all kinds of stuff, so they d it's against nuclear power as a future power source for the United States is over. It's over an item so mind boggles This whole thing we I've, never seen an argument. The girl settled view one The last time you saw an argument Somebody one think of another example.

What is an example in which there was a vigorous debate for decades. And then one side said Roy ok, I guess you're right. I guess nuclear godless do them. I've never seen this. Oh, what happened? What the hell I mean, obviously the advocates marks Nighter Michael Shell in Burger, Bjorn Lombard, probably throw into the mix. I think there is a great job persuaded. I mean amazing job shallow burger in particular, testifying to

where's, probably probably change the fate of the world, let me say that again, don't know for sure. Does your many moving parts and lots of things influencing other things, but from my perspective it looks like Michael Kellenberger change the fate of the world by being effective and that in knowing you stuff and testifying to Congress and telling them you, we need nuclear. Max, I think, he's all think, does what happened now of course arisen much of a counter argument, the argument, is not so much my point verses? Your point. The argument with nuclear evolved into people who were well informed and people are weren't sort of evolved into that, and once enough people got inform, thank you marks nighters. Thank you.

Michael Kellenberger. Once people were informed, there are, on the same side, turns out at least the people in charge says a Jaguar, I'm not. I don't know how I just don't know how to say enough about that. That's really the fate of the planet got decided the right one, Now what if I told you about the there's, a thing called the atoms law slow, moving disasters- if I talk about at all, If you can see a disaster coming decades ahead, such as we will run out of oil or imagining will run into food or whatever will happen in fifty years. If you have enough time,

Humans are always good at adapting were really good at that kind of problem. We got less time or I will fix it, and it looks like we did. I mean there's a ton of work. We will have to be done to develop the new models of nuclear and build the existing ones, etc. but we have a plan and the plan is well within the the doable chill of humankind. Can humankind pull this off? Make enough nuclear reactors to really get on top of climate change in the law? I think so I mean, though that doesn't mean we will. But do we have the capability that we do so we actually have a plan that looks like it could solve climate change. That's like this week. As of this week, we solved

a change going forward. The second big thing is: the year the Pandemic gal solved. I'm not you saw the story lot of you think that we now have a solution to the pandemic, even with vaccinations, but No, the pandemic does solved this week. I salted because Adsum Spirit, I know you would have done it, but maybe your schedule is little desire. The mine, And I look around I said: well, I've got some time. What would be the thing to do solve solves the pandemic, so I did it. I just released a video. There was on the locals platform only until a few minutes ago, so I just I released it from sir. Is it's a captive wrapper, so you can also now it's on twitter and

this video? I explain my plan for solving the pandemic. They have to see the video to see the visual causes, more persuasive with a visual It goes like this say you're in a room with good ventilation. What are the odds of getting covered masks or no man ass? Well, ass, the ventilation is gonna love. It would be almost equivalent being outdoors right. That's what good ventilation is currently sketchy. closer to what outdoors would be like, but lots of places are not well ventilated. So, let's talk about ventilation separately. Everything I say after this everything I say sorry discuss them.

It was complicated everything I say after this I don't know what the beginning their that sentence was anymore. So let me start a new sentence, one that I can finish with a point. The game. So in a room that doesnt have good ventilation. There are lots of those right abnormal room. A normal room in the house, I would say, doesn't have great ventilation it just as good enough, but it might not be good enough for the crowd virus. It might be good enough, worry, heating and cooling and keep you alive, but maybe not good enough. Run a virus. So what I'm going to talk about next has nothing to do with ventilation.

ventilation, the purpose of it, is to move your virus from inside Thoust outside the house. I am not talking about that. Everything I say next has nothing to do with ventilation by your brain is gonna, say he's talking about ventilation. Let me add a point about the ventilation. You know, I see your point Scott. By have you considered ventilation, Corey, stop text during my life's doing so in a moment, I'm slip out because in the comments, somebody's gonna say, and they won't be kidding but you know I won't be the better than what you're talking about Scott. Have you considered ventilation. And then only to read that and I'm to say why, sale price labelling. No, I woeful about I'm I'll go further because

There's one thing you need to your clearly. nothing I say next- is about fucking, ventilation, ok, no, ventilation! Here's the idea! Turnout affair moved around you're done. That's it just. Of fans just regular fans, if any room that you ve got a problem that you think doesn't have good ventilation by itself, can open a window can open a door whatever hands. Cosenza here's the idea, number one fans will disperse your plume faster, actually really fast, so the big, the bigger problem with infection is, if you get a big enough, I reload, if you're in a room with somebody has covered and they're on one side of the room and your hoddan, then the corner. On the other side, like this What are the chances are? You will get covered if the person who has

The carbon is on the other side of the room, even poorly, ventilated, even poorly ventilate. What are the odds while not their high, because the person standing right in front of the person talking well, they ve got a problem because the plume now that the cloud of viruses and water molecules coming out of a person's mouth, if you can get rid of all the plumes, how often would people get infected in a room with people who have given no plumes? Well, here's my hypothesis that eighty percent of the spread of rum plumes. because we know we don't get from surfaces. Surfaces basically kill the virus, apparently, because we're not that worried about surfaces anymore right we worry about services before bus services, it to be a problem. So the fanned as several things

number, one, it immediately disperses the plume so does a reduce eighty percent of what would guess somebody active because they need a certain viral loads for the affection to really too to take root, but also to get them varies. So if all I did was removed the option that people very sick because of our load. They get as a small one instead of a big one, that's gigantic, but I think would actually prevent and getting it now. The second thing that the airflow does, if the air is nothing, can feel it's right. Is it by reducing the plume? It increases the evaporation now and who you should follow on Twitter gave us some stats, and some sciences shows that that's the fact that moving air will reduce aplomb plume and make it evaporate faster. Now it faster

obviously the virus that is carried by the water molecules, the water molecule disappears, the virus falls to the ground. So is the water molecule that protects the virus together into you, get rid of the water molecules that protected the viruses, less effective, drops in the ground, so you ve got one thing: through the plume, so I guess for the viral load almost immediately, so that's probably Priscilla problem, then you have virus itself, less of it, because the air is moving around, announce, evaporating, faster and then the third thing again. This is hypothetical all area this will have, verified, obviously, but if you're moving the air faster is the ear, balancing against surfaces more often, I think the answer is yes.

Let me just gimme me a common sense opinion here in in the comments. Does it make sense to you that if you as an airport that the air will be bouncing off the walls and the furniture. More often. now the surfaces killed a virus pretty effectively compared to you breathing in them right now have I given you three practical explanation, They? You said yourself of well, I'm no scientists, but those probably almost certainly makes sense Ross says their needs to move at least fifty six miles per hour. I doubt it. I doubt it imagine, if imagine if he added plume of cigarette smoking in front of you.

Then imagine a fan on the other side of the room enough that you can feel it on your skin. The plume would just move sideways the moment the there I'll pay. You need fifty six miles an hour. Well, actually let me take that back. Maybe it is fifty six miles per hour at the at the point of the fair, but it wouldn't be once they reach the. During the room, I hear you say: do you ve been fires and I think a fan adjusted easier, quicker solution. The dehumidified probably makes a difference. Do. so there is a will. There is my hypothesis. I believe that its testable you could find now. For example, you could put fans in some classrooms and not in others, Jacqueline check again months. If anybody got well, you wouldn't know think got it in the classroom. There's probably some waited,

but I would like to submit that the pandemic is over and if you ve got a fan in the room, he should build. Take off your mask your interest, now a little bit science. If it could tell us that the fans do make a difference, could it be the difference between taking off your mask in a public place or not say a classroom? Could you could take the masks off if the fan idea pansy? Maybe it be a good trade off because it? If I tell you Not to say because a fake because is giving somebody a reason when they really want to do the thing that you want him to do, they want to do it too, but they need a reason. The sounds good to other people

So, instead of saying, hey takes the mask off. Do you think you can sell that two people were promask? Do you think you will ever sell to the pro mask crowd? Hey, let's just take em off now now that's unsaleable that is unpersuadable! Here's! What isn't do you know? If you had fans there will be as effective as masks. So you can take the masks off. How that feel. It feel like a reason, but it's a fake, because because even the Fans Newark, the masks would still work a little bit or if they work at all right, so, if you were concerned, you would still say well how about both but in terms of persuasion and both would make sense. Maybe, logically, if you didn't know the real risk and you were concerned, but it gives you

fake because politicians need to say I'll, get rhythm masks because either because of vaccinations because of other mitigation. Because of this you got ever because if they care at the because they can get away with it, and maybe the fans would be the because, because can you tell me because here tell me that wearing a mask be more or less effective than just increasing the airflow in the room? You can't, Ghana, because you don't really know how effective the masks are. But they're not like a hundred percent ever effective. This masks have is probably sub twenty percent still worth doing. If that's real, I mean, if they really reduced by twenty percent, use, use them in some situations.

But could you tell me that a fan wouldn't reduce it by twenty percent as well? Then you can't cuz, we don't know but logically, and if you just looked at the reasons it should, I know kind of looks like they be equivalent, so that the sub twenty percent range, maybe I would think fans could ever higher potential low, actually eyes that's good news from talked about that way too much. I think you would agree, should be talking about my cat Blue Boar Well it John startle you'll know John startle, you suing Facebook over sense, For some stuff, he some continuity add on climate change. in which is content was not unscientific, meaning that he did not say something that scientists would disagree with.

He did frame it in ways that would make maybe make you a little more sceptical about some elements of the claims of climate change, but he did not report a inaccurate fact. Nor, nor is he accused, is not even the key. having it. In actual fact, the thing they used a move is something that they imagined he said and then doing them for it. So so thing for something they interpret it. He said they did so less ban, be your landlord mention began by the way I'll I'll be interviewing Bjorn Lombard for his paper back versions book that that's coming. some weeks and allay, though one that comes up so a facebook has explained it. Now you noticed that these

Censoring seems to be unique to Facebook in these stories. Cuz, I'm pretty sure the twitter did not suppress either one of them, in fact, they're talking about it on twitter. So remember, remember my rule. If you can't say something good about something you criticise, you're, probably not credible, gotta, be able, say something good about the things you criticise. so let me do that for twitter. Twitters is a lot of heat for censorship, shadow banning allegedly Sarah, by in this case, looks like Facebook gonna totally wrong and what you're gonna totally right. It's worth. It is worth mentioning Twitter gotta totally right because they didn't vanity this content. So, given credit

there's a new story that binds attacks, cheat of course, Just what he's trying to get his gigantic tax increase on the rich through the system so soldiers details- and I know will be complicated for most of you. So do my cartoonist best to simplify the story if you are an individual, who is doing the job, such as giving speeches for money, which is what I was doing between between jobs. made thirty million dollars giving mostly speeches now One of the things you can do, and it's very common, is that Instead of taking the money as an individual and then paying taxes, just like a human.

You can do some paperwork with lawyer and declare that you are a s corporation. There are different kinds of corporations. The S Corp is typically for this purpose. Where there's like one principle person, who is the business now in that case, used I have to determine at least on paper how much of the money that Biden would get in this case would be in the form of looking a regular salaries for being the ceo of his own S corporation, which has just him. so not only do you define yourself as a corporation but then use Give yourself the job of being the head of the corporation, which is all just you so just by but he's a corporation, but is also a person who is in charge of the corporation. now in that set up. You have to give

your c self, a salary just like you and employ while the rest of the money that you don't call it call celery, becomes income through the corporation now. The reason you do this is that individuals paper taxes than corporations. So, if you can say I'm really a corporation, then you pay fewer taxes, especially for the Medicare portions. Three point eight percent so The higher the salary is. The more you're gonna pay in Medicare taxes. The higher the S corporation, profit part, is that you arbitrarily defined define which portion is which the higher that what is the more taxes you pay? the game with a desktop is to try to get away with, meaning that you're you're, seemingly audit in the future like if we go nodded it. What is the least we can claim is the salary for the ceo.

So the question is over two years made thirty million dollars, Leslie say six and a half million dollars a year. And he made a hundred thousand dollars that he paid himself as a ceo, so it's too here so cut in half four hundred. This involves a year to be The ceo of a six point: five million dollar operation. That's all right! You were the ceo of a six point: five million dollar business meeting his profits were sexually. That's just the prophets, not not the gross, but the profit pre tax with six point: five million dollars is that a fair salary, four hundred thousand dollars to be the ceo of that size of a business. Yes, yes, it is how the ata gonna do fine fine Is this story? Real nope hope is fake news.

Because if you go into a lot and say the complexity of this business was there's, somebody else would make travel arrangements, maybe Jill Justin or something and Biden would just show up and talk and go home, that's all business, decisions does a c o need to making a business like that. No Marge like the sea, oh job is actually an empty shell. It doesnt really do anything that, because the employee makes all the decisions, the agent happens, also be the ceo. So It is for our two thousand too little. To pay for somebody who literally, does nothing now really not really.

Yes, the ceo job had actually been hard like worry and manage a lot of people, and he had to make decisions and strategic bets and stuff like that. Maybe you could argue that thou see odious to get paid a lot of money, but he's basically just a punch. Your ticket, a black gonna form seo, does know anything literally decides a couple of forms a year as it will jump. I would say that he's gonna fly through this. All fine now There's somebody here who is a YO tax, specialist or attack security or southern just jump in and tell me I'm wrong. but on the common sense level foreigners thousand dollars a year to be a ceo of a business that doesn't need any work and all from the ceo tales about right, I feel I feel you get away with it Derek Chauvelin,

is appealing on fourteen grounds. I guess he couldn't a judge or I'm sorry. I couldn't for his lawyer. Had this point, so I think you did it himself. But among his claims he says that is: judge abused its discretion when he denied jobs, request to move the trial and of the county due to preach. Welcome publicity- and I ask you this question- I am not a lawyer, so I'm just look at this as a human who has some sense of what seems fared. What doesn't seem fair even though fairness is not real, how does he loses helping Derek children, possibly lose this appeal never seen a clear case where something should move to a different value. Have you I is, as in the history of trials, has ever been a clue

in our case, where you absolutely needed to move this out of town, because the people in the in the jury would justifiably be afraid for their lives. Doktor Scott, as one of my trolls, is Doktor Scott ads. They just refused there isn't a year. Commerce is able to disagree with it. now the argument against it would be that, no matter where he went, he would get the same. The same level of bias, but I dont think the bias but formation physical threat every everywhere. right if your local to where the crime happened. I think that if you're on the jury, you're physically threatened, but if you are in some far flung place unless, as two years now, the appeals process

Twenty two years from now in a different county where they've already forgotten the story with those people be just as afraid as as the people in the local community. At the moment, it's still really really hot in people's minds. so I think it would be different. I don't see how he loses this so get your seatbelt on I mean, I suppose a lawyer would have a different opinion on this, but as a just as a human, if you ask me, did this look like a fair trial? The way they did it? Now no, I'm not saying he's innocent, nothing like that. I'm not tell you. He should go free, nothin like that, under say: there's no way that looks like a fair trial to a reasonable person. Looking at it doesn't. And we live in the country where it has to look reasonable to us. Let me say this:

Now the law has its own standards right and you have to satisfy the standards of the law, but the law has to look reasonable to us. It has to cuz. The whole system depends on that reasonable people have and say? Well, I might not like it, so I certainly would like it if this law was aimed but I can see why you did. It only makes sense is how would be reasonable to a reasonable person, and this clearly isn't. It is not even close to be reasonable.

Apparently, the January six Select Committee. Yes, it's not a group of losers were studying something that doesn't need to be studied. It's not that it's a select committee premium, platinum grade, asleep platinum, select, gold, star, Prime Committee, and let me tell you with a name: like that, you know that they got some good stuff govern anyway. They ve subpoenaed their first witnesses. That includes trouble, Wireless as recalled Mark meadows, dense, give you know Steve, then an and cash Battelle, I feel like this is the does the balanced the Arizona want it.

yeah, the Arizona on it. The Republicans are expecting some red made out of that can get some red meat, and maybe they won't like wise. The people who think this select committee is going to find the The coup fingerprints all over this and find out is much worse than anybody thought now. I can find it I think it's just gonna be a bunch of people doing what they thought made sense at the time as all Scooby. So everybody is gonna, be disappointed. I saw a very informative thread: what mild covered by Michigan Noah, Twitter user, Michigan underscored Noah. and now a h, and you can look at my twitter feed to find it a retreat, and he,

talks about how we talk about the definition of mild cases of quota virus or covered a mild case is defined as something it and put you in the hospital. But turns out their allotted nasty cases of covered that didn't result in hospitals, asian but they're, pretty nasty, and they might have some long lasting effect and so no makes the argument that we imagine that the virus is not as bad as it really is, because we're misunderstanding mild and were misunderstanding what it means to not be hospitalized in our minds. Not ass belies means, like us, nettle right. Ok, maybe is just like a normal flu, but that's all. It is right, if you, your mild, a mild case of covert, you think sniffle, don't you

or were a little more than sniffle, but that's about anything turns out that that category mild, if you use a medical context, it includes moderate. and will you look at both mild and moderate symptom? Some of them are nasty. The shit. You don't want to hear something. I believe that none of these none of the state is what I would call confirmed, but just give it here. In one study to other three people were covered, least one outpatient visit to a doctor visit one to six months after diagnosis. So two thirds of the people who had covered a month to sex, So this is a long after you should have been better. Two thirds of them have to visit a doctor for one thing or another. Now. The first question you must ask is how many people visit a doctor within six months of adults. Cuz. Remember, most kids didn't have it.

not talk about the healthy people were talk about the older people? If you looked in the USA, over forty crowd were mostly covered was many people over forty? Have it? this one outpatient visit to a doctor in six months. It's gotta be at least two out of three isn't exactly the same number as as this But I guess I'm not as scared by this, because I don't know what the baseline is. I feel like people over forty get to the doktor once every six months feels like it is at least two. But another stays at the end of two hundred Thirty three survivors or members of smallish sample, found forty Percent were suffering from mental illness three and a half years after. I think those after normal. Horrible flew and.

Chronic fatigue syndrome suggested this era, so The suggestion here by now is that the long covered in the possible side effects might be more than we think. makes the case that even the regular flew as longer term implications of people realize, even though just the right? Flew so ass. A regular flu has long term implications that we seem to know that, for some people, anyway, uncovered presumably, would be worse than the actual While the Pfizer booster looks like the CDC had has approved that for some high risk, people got really bad so that the Pfizer has so was approved for a third one, but because there's enough risk that they don't want to give it to low risk people say kids. They only want to give it to you. If you over.

Sixty five, a measure of Unita called morbidity or not, but that tells you a sort of on the edge does I thought we were dealing with cleaner odds than this year. The odds of getting vaccinated versus not getting vaccinated depending on what numbers you believe or will you trust, should be a big difference. Right now is the numbers are accurate. If, if people making up the numbers all bets are off, but in theory the vaccination is like many times safer than but when, but when you get to the booster like well, if you're over sixty five yeah, but if you're sixty four- I if your sixty four may not be worth it, but it's worth it. If your sixty five, ok, I'm sixty four.

So I know to me it feels like this is kind of marginal depending on your age, maybe radius, not marginal, but if here and you're sixties like The here's my next question: why Would you give a third Pfizer booster to these people? Why wouldn't you give them one Madonna Would you be better off or worse off with two Pfizer shots and then the booster being them or would you be better off with three Pfizer's because, if Pfizer has the problem, you get a triple Pfizer, triple the potential problem, but If you give them to Pfizer's and they were ok so far, then he gave him a banana. You get to the same level of protection.

but have you have you diversified your risk?. I would love to see a doctor and expert give me an opinion on that, because it could be. That is just too hard to test it, because it's two different companies now you know this may not be possible to test that, but in in concept. concept given the unknowns in their loss of announce, given the unknowns wouldn't be safer to give them a bundle. China as the booster, yes or no sort, an interesting question. That, ladies and gentlemen concludes. The best coffee was Scott Helms all day I mean since midnight last night. I don't think there's been a better one. This is,

This is it so we're ever ever of our spelled with a name Test for antibodies, first sounds more logical. Anita says, need abuts. Are you a doctor? No I'm the person who's got a better tracker. the doctors, you know, there's nothing that amuses me more than people say Scott. You idiot you're, not a doctor.

Why do we listen to you at all, not a doktor. Well, my track record is better than doktor. So far, I'm sorry, it's just the truth. I do have a better track record than the doctors now. Why is it because I only pick areas were confident so when they said masks, don't work felt she said originally. I said I'm no doctor, but I can. I can spot bullshit, So I spotted bullshit before the doctors that now do, I argue with them about long covert herself. The now I will do what I now saw believes up I'll. Take the doctors over my own opinion on things that I have no special knowledge about, but if it just comes to argue being bullshit it pretty good at that pretty good. So, yes, my track record of just the things I cherry pick to talk about is better than dockers. It's over

You can look it up yourself, update on boo, I'll, get it update this morning, but she survived the surgery just fine and was recovering as of last night and moving around and but I'll get more information today. Now that is all we got for today and I got to run and a pleasure. As always, when will I see you again? That's right tomorrow,