Point checklist, thirteen them check, one of them not checked, guess which one I didn't check. That would be the one where I turn round and take my notes offer the printer which does exist. so it looks like you're going to be watching me print my notes, I don't know what could be more fun than that really, but that's going to be a great show today promise you. By the way, I'm working on my work here and so some kind of a drum sticking to open up the shell, and so you might hear that you are probably familiar with the attackers Karlsson opening his guests, drawn thing and try to turn. You somethin, like that, like five seconds of a drum some kind of a drum thing, but Lucy I saw

the cat, though the gathers back and I've got ten days of feeding or through a tube and medicating her? Let me tell you how complicated it is to be my age and have a success for the full time job. Let me just give you a sense of the complexity now, if you ve, probably had enough medical problems yourself there, you know it's just a gigantic problem to get anything so there's just no decisions and delegations, but I've got a cat with five different medications with five different schedules. Carrying the food as a medication possessed me injected ad, and then you had my own right. If you're a certain age, you ve probably accumulated a number of just ordinary medications. I've got one for ass reflux one,

blood pressure, and so I ve got somebody like thirteen medications with different schedules between the cat and me that I have to juggle thirteen medications, indifferent schedules every day that I have to work to full time. Jobs is pretty ugly over here I haven't slept locked away, but you know I would be great. I think you do what would be great. The simultaneous up and you're here and you're ready for there's gonna, be a great pity one of the best ones ever I mean I want to build up too much, but I feel in it are. Usually. This is gonna be good. Now you need a cover. Margaret class. A tiger tells us that the guilty Joseph lesser vessel of any guide, fill it with your favorite liquid. I like

coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine held the day, the thing that makes everything better and it really does if you haven't tested this yet you gotta do lay be testing Sierra. You feel with it see how you feel without the simultaneous up. Oh you'll be surprised. Europe comes you ready, go. I pity the people who have not taken the simultaneous up because their lives are impoverished in many ways, not just monetarily but impoverished. I say well, Rasmussen has above all this, as the Supreme Court is not to popular these days. Only ten percent think the Supreme Court is doing an excellent job. Twenty three percent say Good Celia Thirty's represent approval for the Supreme Court.

now? If you had to look for one the say identifier or signal that the country might be a little bit of trouble, I would look at the popularity of the Supreme Court now, but I would, I would add this. I dont know if doing a good job. Is the right question for the Supreme Court, Because the Supreme Court is unique in that their entire purpose is to make decisions a you know, most of the countries gonna hate or a lot of the countries. Can I not most so maybe the question should have been if, if anybody's listening, this room Rasmussen, I'd love to see this question put in terms of credibility, credibility

that's a little bit different, then coming up with the right answer. According to you, if you're willing to trust the Supreme Court, even if you don't like their decisions, then you in good shape. Do you think we're there I feel like we are. I feel like that. Their credible still even though biased right, because I don't think that they will do something this like ridiculously bad. They would do things you don't like, but a third of the country thinks is awesome unless a crazy, so that I feel like their credibility, would be higher than their approval, because approvals Billy about. Do you agree with their decisions? Do you follow on twitter policies of arson? What you don't? We should.

yeah, so policies on my very short list of people that everybody should be following because around that many independent thinkers world and their even fewer independent thinkers who come up with ideas that you haven't thought of yourself. This kind of rare Bob Lousy does consistently so follow him. I I think a twitter is just add biology, be as a boy, a l, a Jay. and he treated this morning. Employee issues are demanding a ninety day, cooled down period in their contracts, such that they can't be precipitous. Really fire due to passing social media storms. Sometimes it's real issue, if so ill still be real and ninety days, let cooler adds prevail when you think of that, we think about idea spreading out, isn't it

if you, if you buy into the idea that employees should be organised, at least in some important ways,. Why isn't the union demanded of us This feels like just basic. down. The Middle union requirement. So unions get on this union. Just maybe you didn't think of it, but this Besides basic, really basic employee protection, when you say just really basic I don't think this. Is that the the thing that I like about this idea is that the moment you hear it you wonder why is not already been done susie are like really. This is the first time we've talked about this. This is obvious once you hear it So others, but that their unions- maybe you could do something about ninety they called empire- is a good idea

You may remember that, after a trump lost the election, I was predicting that you would see people on the left hunting. Republicans. Do you remember what happened to me when I said that Oh, my God, Scott! You are aware: crazy, tat, left field. I'll tell you: one thing does not going to happen. Not nobody's gonna, be hunting, Republicans less for sure. Well, a story yesterday is breaking news and anti for member Benjamin Varela, allegedly will not allegedly by he was charged with allegedly, shooting anti mandate? Protester an anti mandate, protestors. was the entire mandate, protester, probably republican, or at least with this anti fa. Member believes that this person was probably route.

So is this a clear example of somebody and left literally hunting or republican looking for somebody to shoot and then shooting them because of their point of view, it looks like that happened allegedly will find out if it's real The Taliban big surprise or not would be allowing women. two were to go to Taliban or to the Kabul University, and I soon this would happen two other universities, or maybe it's the only one. Are there are a lot of universities and Afghanistan, maybe just the one but the Taliban says that women will not be allowed until they can islamic it up so we'll be allowed later, they say, but not until they can make

environment, somehow more compatible with Islam, which are not, but in the meantime they have a good solution, and I think you ll appreciate this. It's like. Well, I'll tell you what like, after all, what is it We use male lecturers for the women so that so women will be able to attend classes in some cases, but there are enough Sheemale lecture, so they're gonna higher men but since it will be apparently on as on his according to the Taliban, to the men teaching the girls directly the men will stand behind the curtain, so there and will be there in person Bobby under current, I thought to myself I feel like nearly as inclusive enough in my life stream here as I couldn't,

because I realized how the women in Afghanistan would not be able to watch me because same situation. Right man They could so. I wanted to give you an example of what I call a Taliban zoo, Euro assume is so the Taliban is gonna, do a version of remote learning, except it is a little bit a simpler model and says that technology is a sore sort of this hate Welcome to tell about zoom class, I mean instructor Scott atoms. And you can see me but trust me- I totally behind this garden, sitting at home on a computer. I, behind this garden, giving you a zoom class

so Taliban ladies pay attention. So I think that worked pretty well Taliban zoom class. See all right. Here's what my weirdest predictions that looks like it might come true by the way. How many of you know the inside joke of the plan like it. If you know the inside joke, don't tell anybody, don't don't put it in the cotton comments you can refer to it, but just don't give away then the reveal I'd It turns out that Bitcoin minors are looking to nuclear power plants to power. There

Bitcoin mining. Now those of you don't follow crypto currency, here's the quick lesson in order to create a new bitcoin which is created through a process of brute course computing, where it follows an algorithm formula, if you will, and only once every year. Who knows how long depends on your computing power? You can discover a series of other was a series of bets. The bitcoin recognises, as a coin set, that crude enough. What next, so. In other words, you can kind of discover a big coins hidden in the bath. I'm giving you the really it is version of this. The also the crypto people are gone crazy right now, let's not quite but just for the euro. The every person explanation, because are hidden in math and in order to

he's the now and own them. You have to do something called mining which is running a powerful computer or network of, tutors for long periods of time and the more bitcoins are found, the harder it is to find the next one. So every bitcoin that you find or creates a higher challenge for the the next available one, so you got to get more and more computing power, and then you take so much computing power to find a bitcoin. Now that it's it's a drag on climate, the climate at risk. If you accept that humans are causing climate change, so there's so much energy that they need that you're talking to the Bitcoin minors are talking to nuclear power. as the user access nuclear power, because I guess even Nuclear power plants will generate a little bit more than they need make. Sets right. They don't want to have only just enough. so our place, we're going to have more power,

I need on a regular basis, but of course, it'd be easy to turn off the Bitcoin part if you ever got in trouble right. So it's kind of a perfect marriage. You put the Bitcoin Mine close enough to take advantage of the nuclear energy capacity and some leaves got a free bitcoins. yeah, what way cheaper, so I asked this question: can Bitcoin ever become big enough in terms of its economic potential to pay for nuclear power. In other words, could is there anybody right now who's on putting on the drawing board a combination, nuclear power plant, maybe gentry origin for right next to or least close enough to a bitcoin? My does anybody look.

to build both of those at the same time, because wouldn't the Bitcoin mine actually pay for the old power plant or what it so that this is my question, You wouldn't do a project that lets say ten to twenty years to build a proper nuclear plant you know it was going to take you listen to say you got it down to fifteen years. You were doing great. I wish I think it's a stretch, but if you get another fifteen years, could you make a fifteen year economic prediction that if you had your relatively free energy, you could pay for the entire nuclear plant just with bitcoins? I'm thinking not because I think that fifteen years makes it so hard to get a new bitcoin. That even a nuclear power plan would be enough to get you a new one. But maybe you only need one right

Twenty billion dollars in fifty years, what maybe one day coins was twenty billion dollars right is rybody. Who knows enough about this area? To tell me that that's crazy is a crazy that one Bitcoin could be worth fifty billion dollars twenty years now, I think possible right because we're only using fractions of them anyway. They re just put that out. There is an interesting thing that might be happening Russell brand new made news today, being not crazy. What did you know that you couldn't make news? National news is trending. Oliver Twitter Erica did I covered you struggle over twitter for simply being. aware of the news

fairly, is aware of the news they Hillary Clinton was the real person behind the Russia Conspiracy, not not tromp colluding with. Russia, but rather Hillary Clinton was actually the architect of the Russia Conspiracy collusion thing and Russell braggadocio with Glenn Griswold, whose use outside the most important voice on this topic lately and the Big NEWS is a rustle brand actually accurately reported a story that the left is largely blind to, but the right largely knows now: here's the quest, We know the rustle brand identifies with the left. You become self, a liberal, I guess and Why is it so unusual that he can please see a story, that's in the news right he's not make stuff up. He simply.

objectively. Looking at the news and he's actually can see it, and we can talk about how many people on the left to do them, how many people could hear that news? They Hillary Clinton, who was always the one behind the russian collusion stuff and just report, illustrate just the facts. Almost nobody, almost nobody and raises cognitive dissonance, because if you are so, committed, suicide is just hard to change. You'll find some weird, ash animalization. Why a really was Tom taught him to boot, not after all, even though there is no evidence that whatsoever. so yeah Bill Mars, another one whose whose awake to these eggs now here's my question. What makes a bill marm or a rustle brand, capable of avoiding cognitive, dissonance or confirmation.

In this case. What is it that makes some able to do that? What what have they done?. or what are they have that allows to be immune. They eventually got immunity, cognitive dissonance, while I don't know, but I'll give you a few some speculation that might be genetic and other? The brain is just built a different way that could be, but I would suggest the following number one think of these three people who will have the same quality. They seem to be able to actually just injected Lee look at stuff on left or right bill, Maher Russell Brand and I'll throw Glenn Greenwald in there. What qualities are they all share? You can get this? What quality they should contrary inhabits. That's a good one again, so they do have a they do have enough of a history of contrary in this that they can be consistent, being contributes so that that's actually really good answer. Wasn't what I was looking for, but that's real better,

maybe there's a miser, comedy well Glenn, Greenwash, sort of indirectly maybe fired from the mainstream. Well, ok, yeah fired from the mainstreamed was Russell Brand ever fired from the mainstream under know about them bravely attention, not bad. These are actually really good hypotheses. Somebody says craving attention, I mean, but would they get it that way? It's me they can get attention. Otherwise there fact banks, but why? Why can they be fact Mason? Why can they be honest, but other people are? and cognitive dissonance I'll tell you I'll tell you the shrews. They altered shrubs. Oh you, magnificent bastard. Somebody says that they also mushrooms I'll bet. That's true that that is true.

If I had to guess from your bill more Russell Brand Sea fight, the gas, probably more yes or no Glengarry won't allow. That would be an issues I loved ask in my question. I don't know, but. fearless is very close to it, so so totally using fearless here's, the yes I was looking for immune from embarrassment immune from embarrassment. Now we can know, is in their head right, so little bit mind reading, so we have to do a observational inside this. How does that look right? Cause we're just guessing what their thinking, but if you look at Bill MAR Glenn Greed Walled and Russell Brand, I would speculate I don't know this for sure that their unusually free from

I'm worried about big embarrassed as something do. The jobs they ve chosen right If you are not afraid of being embarrass, you can say anything. You're, free. so you don't have to worry about covering up. For that thing, you used to say to make it all sound, like your ego was intact and you were. You were always smart. Even if you were dumb They also have chosen jobs in which proving that they, have been wrong, is actually an asset same with me, I have chosen a job if you can call whatever this is a job sort of. I have chosen one in which, if I, if I am wrong lately wrong about something in public like like really seriously wrong. That's content! What's that I would love to. Now how wrong I am about something I've always thought was trip because that to me, as exhilarated so am I likely to suffer a cognitive dissonance

I'm exhilarated to find out I'm wrong. No, it's immunity So I have the same immunity. So I'm speculating here right so bear with me that I'm trying to teach you a concept. It may not apply to any of these three individuals yeah. I can't read their minds But I think that the things they give you immunities, cognitive dissonance is you have to be. You have to learn to be excited when you're wrong in public excited and seven First, you have to be a little bit fearless. An editor helps that you ve been battered before I get help, so you survived a number of shames and embarrassments. As I am So I do think that there is a formula for being free of cognitive dissonance and whether these people did intentionally or is just how things turned out. You have this.

A group of people who literally doesn't seem to be effected as much by the things that are affecting other people. Now here's now here's another one. I've been out this Joe Rogan as a video, and I didn't come tell from the video. This is on the internet today, if it was a trailer for a movie or was it just a video meal, one sure what it is, but the nature of it is Joe Rogan talking on his show, undertaking clips from it and which is talking about how freedom is the basic operating system. The makes everything work at me states and as soon as you start taking freedom away that everything falls apart, like the thing that makes us great now

What makes the video strong is it the way he doesn't his presentations like really impressive and here's? My question for Europe is a fun question of the day Does it feel to you that there's some kind of a one thousand seven hundred and seventy six kind of thing for me, you know I'm talking about remember that the founders of the country, so I hear Washington's and your Jefferson's, your Hamilton's and your and your Franklin's and stuff who are those people today, Joe Rogan? I have yet to map who are worthy like the the founders who need to reset the United States, because it feels like where we need a tuning doesn't like we're gonna too

we're like an instrument we're like an instrument. There was really in tune for decades, but those attitude some wrong and these give fixed retooled, which can. can you map today's Leslie, the independent blunders and I'm gonna- take Alex Jones off the list, cause as awesomeness Alex Jos is in many ways as an entertainer etc. I don't feel like you quite fits this model that I'm talking to his little to provocative. So it is these especially case, but could you map the pundits, the voices a year, the independent voices could you about them to the founders, I who would be George Washington, it might be Joe Rogan Luggage, our open. He might be

Washington who, who is who is Benjamin Franklin? Who is Benjamin Franklin. Who is Jefferson whose Hamilton No most, you could almost see that there's a thing forming is like the founders are reforming. Now I have a last name which has an historical. some historical relevance to the revolution? were related, but not another, descended with income distant cousin or something, but isn't it interesting that that, there's something forming there seems to be the right counterbalance to whatever

looks like the the tuning problem with the country and its time together. Whiteboard now those of you on the were watching on Youtube right now, you didn't know: there's gotta be a whiteboard area, yeah yeah Universe, This is excited if I told you that Africa, but there's gonna, be a whiteboard. People on locals are new it because they get a preview before you do But here is my hypothesis yes, there is here take. Why path open for a candidate who was the end, the division the country and to bring us to a new level of seventeen. Seventy six like freedom and.

I'm going to suggest that there exists completely by coincidence. This is completely a coincidence that most of our divisive Topics have a middle ground. The ball size will agree to this house. Crazy, doesn't if I told you that, given that the huge disparity in like that divisions in this country. You said yourself, my God were, were separated, is getting worse. Number one of the things. I taught you that sometimes you can't tell the difference between being on the edge of disaster and on the edge of the golden age. They feel the same right darkest before the dawn situation, We have blundered into a situation, just blundered the situation in which a All the road candidate could satisfy everybody. Make that case. You think so.

A middle of the road candidate and uttered a holiday I mean I'm not talking about a trump, obviously not talking about Bernie Sanders. Obviously, but somebody could emerge. and let me tell you what they look like. I take take the election on the left you ve got people say the election was fine, stop complaining and on the right. people who say it was a fraud. What is also history, so how could a candidate who wants to bring the country together come up with a plan that makes the left and right happy? It looks like this a there's one thing we can agree on. One thing we can agree on is that we didn't agree about the last election right. We can all agree that we didn't agree about the last one, so less fix the next one and I'll make it my yes, my my main thing to have election risk

Set of rules that guarantee the states have to do a right, they can still do things differently, but they, after Rita, meet a certain standard of one or two but wanted to building now do you have that candidate? The one who says you know whether you think that twenty twenty was fair or unfair. It's also over its also done so was fixed for next time. You would immediately like that candidate right because, because they found the middle ground is exactly what you wanted how about the climate? You got two people on the right say: hey it's a hoax or it's no problem at all. The people in the left is crisis. How can you possibly integrate it's a crisis with it's, not a problem. nuclear energy, because it's the same solution, whether it's a hoax or love, you need the energy. You want clean energy, clean air

so you're gonna do nuclear energy as hard as you can, no matter what you don't even have to decide. If climate Israel, Just find the middle path and say: look I'll make both. Are you happy we'll just go? also the wall, a nuclear, the left likes it by likes it the right likes it. Why are we even have a good conversation? We have to do the same thing: whether climate changes. What you think it is all about is exactly the same path boom the Sioux another one infrastructure bill. The public just wants an infrastructure bill two poles, so this was easy. Just give the public what they ask for being in favour of infrastructure. Only not me I'm not the big one. That's gonna change society overall and not yeah and satisfy the people who think it's just a giant power grab by just say I've just infrastructure. Now,

Would you be able to get that pass through Congress? I now, but if you read for president on trying, you look pretty attractive because the public is on the same page, the public says. Can you just give me a bill the thought of this topic and they will vote on it. That will do the other topic, the public, already there you have to convince and by just take the take the view that the public already has just adopted about schools. We got the right who likes their homes, schooling and having their freedom to teach their children the way they want without all these social justice stuff, but then on the left, who gets people believe in systemic? racism less without says, dumber, systemic racism, so at EU integrate them simple. They they all agree

The teachers unions are the problems so just go after the teachers, unions, the left and the right have different issues, but they both have the same solution. Nearer the teachers unions same solution to differ worldviews, but same solution, easy to unify like more radically easy to unify the country, in fact, I think, is so easy to unify the countries that were blind to it. There we're just not that were not really that foreign different pages. Have different views what's going on, but weirdly the solutions are the same, no matter what you think is going on, so there's more I'm you worried about to vaccine mandates, we're not going to talk about it, I'm not going to talk about it. I know you. I know you forward me

the vaccines, I'm just saying as an issue. How could you bring the left and the right together vaccine mandates, hearsay to leave it to the insurance companies? That's just take the government out of it and just leave it two insurance. Do you know how it happened same thing that happens with everything Everything that happens with every topic insurance companies will decide how much risk you can take or they'll charge you for

that's it the obviously. What happened is insurance companies would charge a different premium for vaccinated verses on vaccinated people? Now they'll probably should do something for people have natural merely as well, but I am pretty sure that the government can just walk away from this question and the assures the insurance industry. Would you say? Well, you don't have to be vaccinated, it's your body, but you do have to pay more now. Do you think that's right does a better. They gonna do it anyway,

insurance companies are just gonna, do the math the way they want to do it Europe, and it doesn't matter about my opinion that I should not have to pay more for car insurance, because just because I'm a male cause, I happened to be a very safe driver, says very unfair for me right, but I little bit about too much, because the insurance company did their math. They have to provide insurance in a way that they can make money Vassili where they can do it. So I can live with and so get the government added the business and let the free market decide what we do the free market works. Every time doesn't well that's an exaggeration, but works often so out. Another on healthcare. The left would like universal health care. The right would rather just have competition. Then do a? U you're on your own eye

like. There is definitely a middle ground in which we say our objective is to get everybody insurance. We don't know how to do it in a way that makes everybody happy. So I think there should be a poor persons plan. I've been saying this for years. The government needs a poor person plan. What would that look like mostly? It would look like removing. Regulations now you like it, don't you, if I said to you, will get a ensure all the poor people. Are you gonna pay for it, you're like a low like poor people having insurance by what to pay for it. But if I said to you, the poor people would have insurance just by removing regulations, Let me give you an example: the regulation against teller tell a health over the phone across borders. Just given that then, suddenly, you have all has a competition for doctors because they can

with over the phone now, there's still a physical manipulation, part someone s, I give you the shot or put on the band aid or set the bone or whatever it is still need. People in person so make one of regular. Tori Jake, the regulatory changes that may be nurse practitioners or nurses can do a lot of the physical stuff. That's maybe a little bit more than they did before. Maybe, while the doctors also still on the phone, you can work it out, but it seems to me that if you made you let's say excess capacity, which is less say getting an mri, had been night. Do you think that demand. Four memorize at midnight is the same as it is during the day, probably not so, if you're a poor person, maybe you gotta get the two a m to Em Mri and you pay way way less. So the point is a a middle of the road kin

It has all the space in the world to Craig solutions that the left and right go. Let's about. now, I don't know, there's any candidate to pull this off. I don't think that this stuff is compatible with the left or the right to feel like a Republican. Could pull it off better. Am I wrong, I feel like I feel like this is a little bit more rustic. What are you talking about? This is Scott. Please stop stop what you're gonna do better than please stop really. You really have to do better than that. Just up you gave a little, but just give me a little taste of what you don't like about

so that is, that kills worry dismissed a hundred and twenty four thousand marijuana convictions or they will after this lay dispatch a hundred and twenty four thousand Californians had their lives ruined causation. Oxfam marijuana and got caught. They probably were small dealers too, but this is good news. A hundred and twenty four thousand people just got their life back. That's really big, so California does something right. Similarly, the report says That's me information six times more flexibly some facebook. and real information. This information is six times more clicks, big problem.

And then they went further and said this sixty three sixty eight percent of far right posts are misinformation and thirty. Six percent of misinformation. On the left, so two users of misinformation comes from the far right. Do you believe that. two reserves and misinformation comes from the far right, according to them CNN. According to some study above it how does that now? Try to little imagine S. Ship assumes chauvinist. Sixty eight percent of the far right posts are misinformation. How does that gibe, with what Bill MAR was just recently talking about that people on the right are far better informed about the risks of covert out? Is that how can it be true that sixty percent of the far right posts are misinformation, but the far right

Far more informed, better informed, explain those two facts: some he says, probably the opposite. Ok, maybe the data is wrong as possible, but how could this both be true? Do you know how it could both be too? The conservatives don't believe everything they click. So if you're talking about what they collect, the conservatives are clicking like crazy on false information. but apparently there not believing it. Because in the end they have better information after looking at six time well look here way more misinformation. They still have a clear idea of what does that mean that their sheltering in a better or is it. That is only a small number of the conservatives are doing all the clicking. It could be that

There's like a small active group of far right. People are just two tons of clicking and it doesn't really affect the average that much that's probably was going. So very misleading report. Surprise from Zenon I saw a tweet from Daniel Buck. on Twitter and I don't ask these numbers are right, but saw I guess S, question number one. Are these numbers right, says that the average yearly home school in cost for homes glorious seven hundred to eighteen hundred dollars per student. Now, obviously, that doesnt costly you count the time of the parents etc, but average public school costs ten thousand to fifty thousand per student. So, like ten times as much

For four public school, so he says imagine what would happen if you use that money for school now, don't these quite that clean right that comparisons ugly. But I would add this to that equation. A hundred percent of the mental and emotional problems of children come from their classmates. Percent of the emotional and mental problems of kids and there are fairly extreme the mental problems the kids today come from their classmates, the classmates dear dear. Do you know any teenagers ask him was other it's a class meets yes, sometimes a teacher of this one percent, it's like almost entirely bullies and bad behavior, now

The home, the old school kids- don't get much of that. Do they don't get the continuous bullying and criticism and attacks on your self esteem and everything else, and let me ask you this: if I said you're gonna go to an environment, we have together, there's no choice. You have no freedom. You have to go to this environment where twenty, curse of the people will be just awful, though just be bullies, they'll be they'll, be destroying you, you can have PTSD when it's done. Would you go to that environment? If you knew that twenty percent of people were going to wreck, you know

You never do that voluntarily, but this was schoolers. School is a guarantee that twenty percent of your classmates are just monsters, they're, just literally monsters, and every care has been destroyed by these twenty percent. There might be more could be fifty percent of monsters every class. Every kid in every class is being destroyed by bullies, because once you have a social media like a weapon of mass destruction, bully people in a massive pervasive way. So I would say that the whole idea of sending people to school with their peers is broken because social media and broke it. Let me say that again, social media made public school a nightmare and it probably needs to be just eliminated.

Probably need to get rid of public schools or guarantee social media, but that's not gonna happen. So, although certainly we have to get his address ever that environment, because so- Media plus public school, equal equals mental destruction of kids look we're really serious mental destruction. I'm not talking about annoyances, I'm not talking about. Oh look. Little Angela is unhappy today. Somebody said some bad. I'm talk about people being destroyed, I mean lives. Just destroyed just going to school is because of social media plus school. They just can't be prepared. You can't put a weapon of mass destruction in the child's hand and that's what we did with social media is a weapon of mass destruction. Yo usually applied one person at a time, but we we basically are arming children with the most dangerous mental weapons. You can never have we're like all

What are these children and walk away? They should be fine. I'm going to ask a question which some of you will learn turn off his feet and above, but if you, but if you, if you stick with me for a moment, I think you're going to find it More interesting in these out, so I don't like to do your standard get vaccinated. Don't give actually means you can make up your decision, but there are questions about these. The statistics of it that are unanswered inherently the one That's bothering me and the reserve bothers me is that is my opinion, so watch what I do now alright. So I talked about people who can be free of a release them even to cognitive dissonance. How you do it by questioning your own opinion. I if you can question your own opinion, both privately and in public

you're a little bit more immune to cognitive dissonance cause. If something happens in this shows your opinion is wrong. Then then, then you say: well I told you, I might be wrong, so you don't have any trigger for cognitive dissonance because you ve allowed. You could be wrong. So here's something that I thought was true their own rethinking. I think I might be wrong and I need They help me here. Ok, so I'm going to ask you a question: why let me start with a primer, I believe,

Your opinion on vaccinations and my painted on vaccinations are both guesses. We believe that we have looked as statistics and fax and you have looked at the odds and we ve looked at her own Cornwall berries. We made our decisions. Do you think? That's what happened because I know I think we both guest and here specifically what we guessed on the risk of a vaccine after the first few months. Now. Historically, if you had a vaccination that was safe for the first few months now, the words we couldn't find a massive, unidentified side effect for the first few months. You are pretty good day the odds of ever. Finally, one then become almost zero, historically historically with different vaccinations with different technology,

We knew that you waited six months and soothing your five. Why? Why, out that to a new vaccine, I can. I use the experience with completely different vaccinations to make a decision about this. One is brand new and hasn't been around for years. Now. Suppose it's true that every let's just enough, this is true, but listless Astro there, every vaccine. issue for the last thirty years, we have the experience and if I didn't give you problems in the first few months, you're safe, statistically speaking, but why would they two of every new vaccine, especially if it's a new technology? Why. said that our experience with other vaccines, which are other vaccines? What does that tell us? What's gonna happen with this one, just big, They all went to certain away before? But this isn't? Those is

You're saying that your next vaccine will operate like the last one, knowing know, is a completely different technology. isn't that exactly like saying that trumped would be just like other presence. Every presidency lattice sort of the same everywhere. we're gonna president. They moved to the middle sort of, AMOS every other president, but then trot comes along, didn't see that common Didier. Why is it that I believe that and this is the part of question? Why is it that I believe that the history of other vaccines tells me I'm safe with this? There was a logical, that's my opinion, I'm tell you my opinion doesn't make sense to me right. Tell me I'm wrong. That's me opinion and it doesn't make sense to me- does theirs

connection between those other vaccinations and the one I got right so I would love to hear question for doktor drew question for any of the doctors who have more insight on this one, logical connection, can I make between this new vaccine and others. why? Why would I expect this experience to be the same as that. Now. Here's the other thing you don't know long haul, so you don't What the long haul risk is don't know what the long all risk is, if you can call it that from the vaccination itself, and yet you and I having no information whatsoever about the main risks. Have come to these like solid decisions about what to do? If you're, not questioning your decision, you should be well

ask you this question. Whichever way you went, how many of you are a hundred percent sure you made the right choice, no matter which way when vaccinated road accident. In the comments, how many of you are a hundred percent you're, looking at the comments and say mostly now, but there are fewer or one hundred percent sure ninety percent seems like that's where you should be. I think a lot of other prisoners more than you think. Maybe it's not scientific or anything, but I've seen a lot of honor prisoners. I don't think that's a rational opinion, so I think that when the weather, your pro or anti vaccination, a hundred percent, others are the ones that have the wrong opinion. That now look. Let me just now, but if you have some strange co, morbidity ease or year, eight years old, maybe maybe a closer to honour percent.

But for people in the middle now listen we specifically if I were to decide to give access, not I would add, to calculate my odds. How do I calculate my odds can't do it? I can't calculate my odds. I can calculate the odds of somebody, my age bless me, do do my odds, applied anybody. My age group, how many people who were sixty four are. As far as I am by Body Mass index thou art. So what is the risk for people with my body? Mass index were also sixty four, who knows I also have a co morbidity aspect, on the list of the bad commodities, so there I'd say: ok, that's a risky situation, but one of the medications

There seems to have a high up effectiveness. Recovered is one that I take for asthma. The boot detonator would have an illness. I forgot the name, but there's an asthma asthma beds, seems so help against covered. So if I have asthma but I'm not doing that those medications that may or may not all begins covered and I'm sin, but I'm old. What is my risk? No idea now so, if you're, looking at your own personal rest, is that okay and my specific case, I got this kind of risk and then you know there's this much long, haul, wristband, there's as much long term vaccination risk. These are all unknowns. You don't know your personal risk. You might think you do, but you don't you. Don't you don't know your dna?

now that affects things etc. You don't know we're ace to inhibit inhibitors. You don't know that stuff. So, to imagine that we are making rational decisions is not I don't like we are so here's. Why and limited where this all started. I was accused of having contempt for my own viewers and I'll bet. That's not about that. Wasn't just one person who thought that about how many of you think that how many of you think that I've shown contempt for my audience, justly your comments, remote, because I think there is good. I think some of you go see us sometimes now, mostly now, but seen a few yeses years. What I was thinking, I can't have contempt for your gas

when I know minors, gas. Let me say that I get it wouldn't be rational and, like you, I don't know how I would generate contempt for an opinion which is just a guess. When my opinion is just a guess, why is my guess superior to your guess, I'm in and by the way? My guess is just about me. My guess is uneven about you. I don't have an opinion about whether you should you have actually thy level let me so I will. I will say that we should all take a little little helping of humility. If you think you can calculate your personal ads, you can't, and if you think you can calculate the odds of the vaccine being a danger, you can't, if you think you can calculate the long haul cover.

Risk cat. You can't so we're all guessing an icy J. Your call you in that it and educated guess is it I mean it. because how educated are you about the long, long term risk of this vaccination? You couldn't be because nobody knows So definitely I can tell you with certainty that, whatever my colonel processes, it doesn't feel anything like contempt and, let me say even more clearly, there is no way. I could ever generate a feeling like contempt for subscribers on low people who are literally paying their money from my content. There's no way

under any scenario of Unifil contempt about that group of people, how would you have and generate that feeling? Like? I not condemn, feels like I don't know him now you possibly have the feeling, no matter what they said so he's paying paying for my association. I got automatically on your team, I'm good with you. but then you felt pressure to justify your decision. Explain my decision did, I think, that's a fair common sounds like I just I try to justify my decisions by explaining it, but I think in the end the cleanest waited to express was happening. Is there Well, I guess I let me tell you what you missed on locals. If you are not a local subscriber here are the

micro, lessons about it MIKE lesson. Just put this on your on how to pay attention has focused if you're having focused problems, How to make yourself happier teach with motivation, do use funny. Word: Ceta, find a mentor. How do wake up on time, how to give criticism the power praise about a hundred and fifty and two hundred and fifty MIKE. The lesson is wrong to five minutes. Each one would give you a new skill for five. seven dollars a month depending on whether you the annual subscription, and so what I try to do is give you more than seven dollars worth of value every month, and ideally thousands of dollars was the value in terms of what it does for your life. That is my show for today best whenever I think so. I think you degree just keep getting better and I'll talk to you tomorrow. I gotta go. Do some stuff.