We got doktor well good morning, everybody. How is it my imagination, or did you get better looking? Did you lose weight? You working out you. Great this morning, but you know I would make you look even better the knowledge that you're part of something bigger than yourself something read something that connects us all over the world. Yes, the simultaneous up, it's the most amazing thing that ever happened really ass. It's amazing and all you need is a cover among our glasses tanker tells his tie. The canteen jogger flask of vessel of any kind, Filled with your favorite liquid, I like coffee, You join me now, please for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day

the thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous up and watch your antibodies increase. When you do this, you ready really go well, Oh, I don't know who felt the same on your end, but I could feel by everybody's increasing, bring on a covert. I'm not afraid of. You were right. That's why they are both both Youtube locals. You guess each other's comments, but at the same time everybody was before saying antibodies. There should be the new,

This should be the new sign off after the sap ah antibodies. I dwell address back house too today. There's a study. Does that changes in voter idea, laws, Donna fact anything what what fairly doesn't change. The voter registration doesn't change the turn out deeply that changes and voter enjoy your idea, laws to have any effect on. What are you expecting that. I'm not sure an expectation you the way, but here something I have always believed. If you

to do the Venn diagram, and I think I'll do this. No, I can't I can't make that motion with my hands. It'll. Look like a white, supremacist and motion. Imagine if you will use your imagination, This hand is being held up in a fashion which I would say, would be the ok simple serve a circular thing, and my other hand would be doing a similar thing forming a circle. Which I can show you gotta get cancelled. one of the circles would be not overlapping the other circle, a veteran diagram with fingers. If you will and Ivan Diagram with fingers, would show that there are zero people who really want to vote the care figure out how cuz of lack of already, I feel as though

this ban for years, since we're looking for one person who wants to vote and care figure out how still waiver first one early Let me tell you something a little trick for determining what's true and what's not, I use this with love now, like all of these techniques, for determining what's true, they don't work all the time. But what is that, if the side or let us say the data will also science, but I could be statistics as well. Say, the science doesn't match your observation, then you should raise a red flag right. There should be some scepticism if if you're just observing the world and what science or statistics tell us, you is true. Just clearly that true, your observations doesn't match doesn't mean your observations. Right, I mean the reason we do. Sciences statistics is cause your observation.

Grab crap, you think you see patterns you, don't you think you see a correlation it out so we're really bad at your spotting, any correlation, but don't you think we be able to spot the existence or non existence of a human. I don't have to be. A scientist will have to be a statistician, either is a person who fits into the category of really wants to vote, but can't figure out how, because a vote right problems were a person you would only need show me. One just show me one, and I say I guess. I guess I personally exists. Maybe there's, moreover, wage find one before you're really and for you,

not one example of an actual human beings we just couldn't work it out really wants to vote, feels feel strongly about politics, but now strongly enough to figure out again and I ve no, There are no people like that; they don't exist. We would have seen one of them by now right, so I'm gonna call bs on the fact that vote radiates ages. I think- and I agree with the with the statistics, because it matches observation. My observation is another: these people exist, and certainly there is a great incentive for the news to produce these people right. If seen, that could produce a pair.

All the people who couldn't figure out how about you, don't think they would have done that by now or even about man on the street or less access person on the street interviews. That would have done at least a person on the street interviewed say how much you want to vote. Why aren't you doing it right? It's all messing dog, not marking here it is clear that dog now barking. That's all those people who can figure out how to vote. Talking to you. same time, complete silence? Well, coincidentally, we also have a report. I think the federal so is part of this model, anyway, as a new book out whose title I forget, but somebody autonomy in the comments Let me just say this: I have not read the book. I can remember his name, but somebody else how rigged the books name is rigged

If you're not familiar with Molly Hemingway, you should become fully familiar with her, in my opinion, may be the best political observer commentator. I won't even color abundant because she is better than pundit pundits. This is almost a sort of an insult But I was saying the top wrong of dependable people who have a good take, can frame things right, Eliza, complicated situation and know enough about it to say something: new, very few people, good that she's one of them. So I haven't, I don't know anything about the book, but if she wrote it and you read books, I think you'll look into that I'll, probably look into it myself. I only ordered

today so that that's that's your helpful for further. You should be at least following Molly Hemingway on Twitter, one inferior, strongest, most reliable voices. I think. Anyway, there's some information that Zuckerberg basically bought the twenty twenty election for Biden in the way did it was putting his wife over four hundred million dollars into nonprofits. There were. Those to be non partisan, but basically on funneled their money too likely to boost the turn out of likely democrat voters. Now was any of that illegal was any of it illegal. I don't think so. I think every was all legal right.

Should it be, I'm not sure that our system anticipated anybody that rich, because you'd have to be like crazy Ridge to have so much money that change the outcome of an election in that way. So keep in mind that we have credible knowledge, knowledge does Eichelberger basically bought the election because he followed it into the places. Where would matter the most and those are the places as one just the way I hoped is, spending would would make a deal, I mean we can't read his mind, but one assumes that was a boy, and so now we know this that there was something fishy about at least the fairness of the election. If not the legality of it, I I have have a reason to think it was illegal. I'm just is a fishy process because of money. Now this

to Trump's statement which, when I saw it on social media, I didn't believe it like. I I thought it was fake knew. I didn't think you really made this statement so keep in mind that my first impression was this, but you sure he said that, like I had to actually see it from some other sources. I believe it, but he actually others. Yes, let us if we do solve the presidential election fraud of twenty twenty parenthetically, which we have thoroughly and conclusively document. As this is tromp nuts Republicans will not be phoning in two hundred and twenty two or twenty four. It is the single most important thing for Republicans to do. What do you think of that good move, good persuasion?

Because it seems to me that Trump is taking Republicans of contention, it looks like he's. Can please tell him not to vote which would guarantee another sweep by Democrats, which would make it even less likely that the election reform would happen? Does this look like a mistake to you? Of course, people sentenced to be immediately said. I explain why this is brilliant persuasion. Well, I suppose it depends. What you try accomplish so here's what it did accomplish got attention deftly guy attention. It allowed him, because I got your attention allowed him to promote his view. The election was stolen and that he's got a conclusive, documented proof, which I am not aware of.

Are you I'm not aware of any conclusive documented proof of that by he gets to YO. Send that message on on the signal that is provocative statement carries s so he wins that way. So he gets attention and he promotes his message to mostly the base and but what do you think of that? This part Republicans will not be voting in twenty two or twenty four interesting, the way he worded it? He didn't say I'm going to try to make Republicans not vote right, because people took this as a threat but read the words carefully. He did not say

If you don't do this for me, which is fixed twenty twenty, somehow like you, can fix the past. If you don't do this for me, I will somehow cause people not devote. Does the other power, I suppose he does by influence, but if you're republican would you like that there any Republicans who would not vote because Trump wasn't happy with twenty twenty anybody. Is there anybody here? It would be in any way influenced by trumps opinion that

maybe people won't but is not saying you shouldn't he's he's acting like a spur diction, that's not a threat prediction is not a threat. Is all I say yes, Paul Paul Paul collider says yes, I M not sure you mean that exactly you're you're, a provocative erfall, you might have some were so I say that the now wouldn't take. Many us is to change the lecture. I suppose, Tromp is right, but only five percent five percent would change the result of her, election. So I'm not sure is wrong. There might be some impact.

But it would be irrational. You're. The rational thing to do would be to make sure you about at least now that down and then also work on, election integrity. Here's some advice for tromp. If he wants to win. If Trump wants to win Lego, twenty twenty and making about fixing election integrity for the next president, the one after him make it about the president after you, you can be our president again right, I think many of you probably have the same feeling I do, which is I'm not so sure we want somebody of this age. Trumps age and some are used as provocative and could be as divisive as they can be. I'm not sure you all want that.

If it turns out, he is the best option. I could probably supported again, but I don't know they will be. I don't know that the the primaries will necessarily produce have as the candidate who, certainly as leader of the front position, This has to lose, but the we just have to say something a little extra provocative, maybe maybe it's over so I'm not sure this is best move. His best move would be to say you love me now make a top priority to make sure that the next election- you don't have any questions well,. Just elect be overwhelmingly yet the Republicans in their and our top priority will be to sixty election system. Do you know I that probably won't happen, because Republicans don't want to fix their approach. too many states where the Republicans have some kind of weird advantage, and they just want to keep it.

So as long as there are some states that, like the broken system, the way it is not enough, he gave them. but I would certainly be more likely to support trump or any anybody around on this platform to say we can fix it. It's too soon to fix it right away, but it's got to be a national priority. We will figure out how to make and here's the specific way to do it don't just say: make elections fair, cuz, that's just too active. Who knows what that means very specific that by year, twenty twenty eight will have a system in which we can instantly audit, and you will now, if your, if your vote was counted about that, just a very specific goal, to have an instant audit, so everybody can find out if their vote got counted by two thousand and twenty eight

I would have liked that guy or that woman, whoever whoever comes up with that view, in fact I'll even go further. You want, you want something really provocative little lose half of my audience right now. If a Democrat runs on that platform, I'm going to I'm going to support him. Sorry top priority if a Democrat runs on the platform of making our voting instantly auditable to get rid of all this uncertainty. I will support that Democrat and I don't care what the other policies are

That is clear enough. Ok, what the party is, I don't care with again. It is if they look like they could deliver that sixty elections. I will. I will wipe from my mind all the other stuff, because I don't think they can necessarily push through you. Socialism solving basket happen. They too will be enough pushed back that view there will be problems, even the infrastructure bill, couldn't get past, so not to worry about things getting out of control, no matter who is and who is president. But if you give me this one thing: just gimme the one thing fix the elections, make them and I'm good, because everything else depends on that. If you, if you can't be sure that you are elected the person you elected everything else falls falls apart. Give me one thing making good and you got my support. It's not gonna happen. Don't worry about it. Nobody's gonna run on that.

I guarantee nobody's gonna run that platform. I ran through my what I call my fake news, shelter I probably to retreat that link every now and then so it's a right now, it's just a Google sheets page where they essentially a check list of things to ask yourself to know whether you news is fake news. I ran through it a few stories that we do not don't yet have the conclusive evidence for weathers, true or not, but the one I ran through as these story about the train gender sexual assault in lieu down county now, the part I'm not questioning- is that a sexual assault occurred. Everybody here that everybody here that clearly, I'm not I'm not a sceptical that sexual assault occurred. I dont know that dead. This is that's not the topic. I'm questioning the topic

questioning is the nature of the assailants was an was the assailant wearing a skirt redress? I guess some some They start was the assailant wearing the skirt to quote gain access to the women's room as part of the raping plot sexless a sexual assault, and I think it's figures I think is fake news answer today. Now that a little time is going by, I thought all over,

Google in the last people, do we have any confirmation that the assailant was wearing a skirt. Do you know there isn't any right do you know there is no confirmation and anything that would be credible of the student? Who was the assailant, the alleged assailant wearing a skirt, so he says goal Post Oh, no, I'm I've never questioned whether the salt took place, because I'm very much on the point of view that, if a if they were- or a man reports, an assault that I wasn't there. So I take that seriously, which doesn't mean it happened, I'm just not doubting. Again, so is different to say that is credible than it is to say that is true.

So I would say that any any initial report of a sexual assault is credible. That's fat first right, so I would train them all seriously at first. The part that I quest Because- and let me say this is closed possible- I'm never going to question an initial claim of a sexual assault on this or anything else. So that's not the topic the topic is, is really about. Somebody was wearing a skirt, get raping privileges, not privileges but raping. Yes, so here's the closest thing we confined to that alleged assailant wearing a skirt, it's a boy. who was sometimes known to wear a skirt, not a trance, so here's the first part the story did you?

is that it was about aid, a Trans person. The reporting is not that is in transposing the reporting. Is that it's a boy? This is what the new says now. Do you think that the new? is insulting the Trans community by calling a Trans person, the boy and a girl stress? Do you think that the news, the Woke news, is referring to it as a boy and a girl? ass, knowing that, if it's really a Trans kid that is not the way you're going to refer to what I said yet lobby apologise that there's no way you're gonna need to refer to the situation being the situation, not the person. We do not have confirmation

Student was wearing a skirt during the assault. It is somebody who is known to earn a skirt. How often do you think this person war skirt? There was the veneering for my cat. I have to get back on that. There's the assault is what matters, not the skirt yes or no Then they say what matters is the assault, not the skirt? Yes, I know what matters to the victim is the salt young. Certainly, society cares about the assault more they thing, but these skirt part is what made it a national story is not a national story, because somebody get a solvent, that's unfortunate

every day is the skirt that of the story? I'm only doubting that part of the story, because it was too on the nose so keep in mind and Let me see if this issue could be another fact check on this. Am I. The only sort of national figure somebody's got some kind of the platform am I the only person is questioning the story. The scope of the story I haven't seen by else. Do it I might be the only person in the world is question. Was the perfect permitted to be in the bathroom? Don't Do you think that the school would have already told you? Let me ask you this, had been an actual trans student.

Actual access to the girls bathroom I feel like. We would have her that by now. Do you, and by the way it was her a lock on the girls bathroom, I feel like anybody could walk in the door and walk in. I don't know if this report was important all right about that, so I'm still down I could be wrong. So I asked this question on Twitter. Why is it was so we ve got all this truck shortage and allay so the ports are all backed up for weeks or whatever, because there aren't enough trucks to unload.

goods and then distribute them to which I ask. Why is the cost of all the every other good that they're carrying? In other words, all the things are shipping? The price will go up because a shortage. Why is it your blowing off the that our not blowing off the vet get back to the better as I am a veteran, but it was leave that veterinary in your document, and so why is it that does supply and demand, doesn't work for truck drivers, supply and demand? He works for all the things on the track, but not the driver. So we have a

a shortage of drivers, but the price were willing to pay. Them is not going up fast enough to get more drivers, and how long does it take to train the truck driver, acc training seriously? How long does it take to train the truck driver? I'm just asking I would thank two weeks. I think two eggs and we didn't see the problem developing in time to trains and truck drivers. I have also heard that it's a combination of things that I guess California, some restrictions about green stuff, etc, and then maybe fewer people be able to have a truck. Do you have to have a newer truck, because I have a lot of insurance. The pay is low. I guess the pay for a truck driver has increased in forever

but maybe it is a little bit now so I just have questions why we have such poor visibility on what the hell's going on. I get. That is a complex system and it doesn't take much to bunch it up. Maybe it's just a shortage of drugs by feeling

something else going so that by the demonstration somehow was instrumental in getting the port to open up for more hours, so they could just work overnight as well as during the day to which I said what you tell me, the dead. The docks were not already twenty four hours. What what did you know that the docks didn't already work around the clock there there lined up for weeks and only only today, so they say you know if we work more hours really we're just figure now seems pretty massively interpreted, I'm sure the unions

or part of it. I'm sure there were, God knows where regulations, but I feel, like form, could fix that faster. Did you run into problems all the time where you save yourself? Think Tron could have done that, no matter what criticisms, you're, gonna, love, legends and ups, you cannot plan for this amount of volume. Looking at this, so we have a logistics professional. You says you can't you can't plan for the increase in volume or what cause that increase. The increases that I see the comment, but I understand the comment, but you can. I think you can get you what is

cause the gigantic increase in imports. We didn't see that come backlogs on the pandemic, so basically all it is is that the pandemic is over and there's suddenly more demand for stuff, but to the logistics. experts here, you know. I certainly here what you say that understand. The basic point is a complex system. If you get a shock, it just takes a while for the system to adjust, but only today, they figured out to work more hours where it will not talk about the hardest solutions in the world gets more temporary trucks. Do you think that these state,

federal government cannot say temporarily: hey we'd, like you have these very green Troxler new we'd, like you, have a certain amount of insurance or whatever, but is an emergency. So if you ve got something with four wheels brigand over will fulfil it up you don't you think that we can do for you to go some way to guess extra trucks going. I feel I trump would have made that happen. Don't you see, somebody has some kind of regulatory complication there there was holding up national guard know about the National Guard, but I don't think they could the ship to make a difference. Well, there was a man in Norway who were killed five people with a bow and Arrow Mass. What would you call it? Mass harrowing Is it a mass shooting? If you use a bow and arrow, we call it a mass harrowing

And I have mixed feelings about this. I am not proud of its number one. This is a horrible tragedy and we, of course, have to think first of all of the victims, horrible horrible tragic. Imagine this imagine only I can Imagine being part of this sort of money and resource? This is horrible tragedy and our thoughts go with the victims. On the other hand, I am always impressed by good work, no matter where I see it. and here's a guy who managed Ashley, kill five People- Health asked and how accurate do you have to be with a bow and arrow to give five people before the crowd can get to him and after the first Barroso guy here with an arrow

Weren't people saying hey a word that arrow come from its over there. He is loading up. Another era. I can see why he would get a second person, but how did the fifth person figure out how to get out of arrow range and how quickly can you shoe five arrows and then it must be like YO? Who is Was a superhero on the vendors Hawkeye like Hawkeye I mean you can't even do it on tv without fast forward and get was easier now. Give me that.

People were falling over dead and nobody could figure out where it was coming from four, while somebody says five arrows and thirty seconds that what they are high capacity quiver, something is or high capacity quiver, where you're joking right away the old people yeah it? Maybe the fact that it was silent and the old people were just probably crumpling yeah. It probably took the full thirty seconds for people to figure out. Even what was go. If you'd Ernest shot. You would immediately known what was happening in people were dispersed that problem. So I think there are some report that this person was recently radicalized to Islam, but so weird

Well, the funniest best entertainment, the weakest Joe Rogan, had Sunday Gupta. Have you seen the cliffs? so Sancho Group does the medical problem? so. I say to them And I'll tell you The clips- I all this some good stuff so annoying so my license you know famously Joe Rogan guy. And he took over makin, among other things, some are prescribed by doktor and see then, and others decided to say that the Joe was taking the horse de warmer. Now I don't have to explain to you that the drug I've Rebecca was designed for people in that one, a Nobel Prize that works wafer people, but there is also an animal version. So.

see them sailor jargon was taking your horse de warmer is fake news and there's no other way to say and so he challenges Sunday Gupta during the interview he says this is a call for a broken turkey into something of day says: does it bother you that the network you for out now lied just outright lied about me. Taking hors d were. I think a Sunday was not quite ready to defend everything that other people is that on the network. does it not something he said so there's there's no indication that Sunday Gupta ever referred to it. That way and yeah he's more credible than most people there and then just said, why would they lie and say that's horse de warmer Rogan ass? I love

broken asked these, as I could afford people medicine motherfucker. It's really take us. I can afford people medicine, no other so funny. I can afford, the poem I don't know. I don't know why this funny Persians, I guess that's, why is, is a professional me says That's ridiculous is just lie, don't you, It's a lie like that is dangerous on a news network. Where do you know that they know they're lying? You know I know they're lying. This is what Rogan says. So. Do you think that's a problem. they, your news network lies brick brutal. That's the best part about this is that there is no question on facts,

There's nothing to see- and I can say this like well, we were sort of right now. You want a sword right, There was an intentional lie every time they said it was an intentional lie. There wasn't sworder right wasn't a horse, they were so then he goes on says, This is jargon still here's. My point is you're working for a news organization lying about a comedian taking horse medication. What are they It is about Russia. What are they telling us about? Syria, Do you understand? That's why people get concerned about the veracity of the news? Oh, my God, s about us perfect is as an attack can be. I always feel sorry when somebody,

it was in one profession, let's say the medical profession Sunday Gupta comes against somebody who's in and who one of the most famous capable people in the world as saying short, clear, jabbing Lee insightful things, this sort of what made Joe Rogan Joe Rogan that he can talk better than and people can talk. Now you just communicates other nuclear powered way that just ordinary people just don't do something. the sword like not a fair fight so kind of funny, but. Here is something this surprised me so given Joe

programmes, the size of his audience? I believe he said when he was talking to Sunday, the oh. He was questioning the purpose of the vaccination if you can get and transmit the virus just as easily if you vaccinated, which turns out not to be anywhere near true, So it turns out that European was under the impression that the vaccination would not vastly reduce the odds and getting the virus and also the odds of transfers. So that is a really really big piece of information to not be aware of, if you ever, if ever platform. Now this is a criticism. This is a criticism of Joe while, by the way, big them, and I dont think that we should expect the non medical people to be right and all the medical stuff. That's not a thing.

but here it was you who was Joe, was with gigantic platform, and he was corrected on a really really fundamentally important fact that that vaccination is vastly reduces the odds of getting infected and and also reduces by large amount, the odds of giving it to somebody else and, of course, reduces the US having a bad outcome. I feel it would be interesting to see if Rogan takes this new information and does well only somebody like him could do their theirs. People just have powers and other people do have and if he hasn't and all Mary person would have to bury that, and just act like it didn't happen, because it would be embarrassing to be that wrong on something that important I mean vital to the health and wellbeing of the country. I mean really really super important.

so we'll Joe ragged, and take this new information that to Sunday grouped gave him and incorporate that is future conversations about the topic now is people are asking. If it's true is true that the medical community feels its confirmed. I guess as different the major issue that the experts are pretty sure that, based on the data there there very confident that this doesn't seem to be one The things that there's a lot of questions about so I would love on and then Rogan ass. A perfectly good question, which is why do people with natural immunity after give vaccinated, simple question? Do you wonder the lead to what's wrong with my? told me so years. Nothing. The Sunday Gupta knew that jargon. That now and I didn't know it either

natural immunity, doesnt work. Thirty to forty percent of the time. What did you know that? Did you know that thirty to forty percent of the time, people who actually get the virus can actually just get it yet how many new that we knew that you can get the virus and then just get gosh. You didn't get enough immunity the first time now, in the same way that you can get the vaccination and also get the virus quite you're, far more light, to get the virus a second time according to Sunday, Gupta far more likely to get it a second time. If you Our only have national immunity. Is that a good reason, L a lot let's take for take for a moment if the information is correct is would it be a good reason now I can't confirmed the data, but I say such a goop disparate close

The real data nobody's. Let me say this as far as I know, nobody has ever accuse Sunday Gupta of lying about data right. We all agree on that. Such a gupta, despite the fact these unseen, then, is a credible, credible person. You might not like it but use credible, and I don't think he has any background that would suggest he would do anything, but your report what he, what he believed he knew based on the facts. So that's actually I see Actually a really good answer. The real Good answer is a natural immunity is great when it works, but you can't depend on it. It's not nearly as good as being natural immunity, plus vaccination. Now I do think that that might be the sort of thing the revised later. It might be the sort of thing where people so oh well, we're wrong about this. We have to revise that. Maybe I think it's in the category thinks it might be revised someday.

It's a good is a good answer. Our ears and other geronium brought up the Mayo Cardenas in kids from getting the shot. now. You are all aware that especially young boys, I think, are more likely to get my car data, which is some kind of enlargement of the heart, is, it'll they're, pretty much all released deal with them. I think a day or something So almost nobody dies. So even the kids we get this doesn't seem to be. A death sentence is just something that is inconvenient for a day or so.

But did you know that the risk of getting that my own Cardenas is far higher? If you got the virus, there is a risk of getting it with a vaccination that lets unknown risk Sunday, good to you acknowledge, is but the risk of getting it. If you don't get the shot his higher, because basically we're all gonna get the virus and actually how many of you knew. That John says: it's a lie. Somebody says now that assumption so you're you're sceptical of the fact that right said who so he hears here's. What I would challenge you with, and you can you can you can challenge we write back so so surface. Do I do

researchers all see and again, I'm always say what what the expert opinion would be. I'm not tell you this. In my opinion and I'll tell you won't change and not tell you right. Just tell you ass. The expert opinion at the moment is that the data says much much higher chance of the myocardial this. If you're not vaccinate now. Those are three really really important facts when you say that can I say facts, but maybe some of them will be revised at some point. Maybe will learn more. I think that Joe Rogan was short. Three really really important facts. Am I right. So the way this is being reported is that young Rogan dont on CNN more than Sunday

and thus true, did Duncan Sea of he did it really well, it was fun to watch, but. I think the discussion was Sunday. Gupta was really really good, because your people watching Joe, Logan, probably your leaning, anti vaccines at you check your facts. Somebody says I'm asking you to check them. I've got a good source, Sanjay Group, so argue with him? Don't argue with me. Remember, I'm not saying is true. You don't need to argue with me. I'm saying that a person who surveys what the experts say says the experts say I can confirm it so don't worry about it. The messenger I feel like some of you are getting married me. Are you getting Madame me because I'm not making any claims. I'm just tell you what other people claiming talk about me. Just tell you what the landscape is.

So I would like to say again that Joe Rogan shows like a national treasure because it is illegal Is one place where people are not trying to lie the one thing you can be sure about Rogan is he's not try to lie. Research is definitely not trying to mislead everybody about anything you agree with. It Like you, I see an engineer. You like, I think, they're trying to lie. It looks intentional. Doesn't it. but if Rogan is wrong about something he's just he's just us because were wrong about stuff too, but does not lie in the election of that now. Look at look out. Valuable. This is, I always see the glass half full look. How valuable this conversation was. This is the first time that there was something like a polite detail. Conversation.

Between somebody useless I'll, say a little bit sceptical about the vaccines release, the mandate of the vaccines and. somebody you had a little bit more information doesn't mean is right, but whose more information- and this really valuable, I feel I learned. I feel I learned a lot of us, so I would like to say my highest compliments to both Joe Rogan and to Sunday Gupta Doktor Gupta. for, in my opinion, the most useful information exchange in the entire pandemic. Would you agree that I think this was the most productive most honest, most useful conversation on this topic that I've seen so far.

So complements the bulls people they degree apples looking into making their airports into health device. I guess they can turn their airports into a hearing aid without too much work. He could body temperature monitor posture and of course there are others other things that you do your phone and other sensors. so apples, apples producers, but this health stuff. Certain, so this asking me does Rogan have got his face. Let me go back to the importance of being free of embarrassment. Now I can speak for him because I can't

inside his head, but does it look like Joe Rogue into somebody Agus embarrassed easily? Everybody can be embarrassed, but does he look like the guy who's gonna crawl under a rock? If he said something was wrong? No, no! So what do you say stuff like YO, YO, Distill Rogan have agar spacers embarrassed raving about now about? No, because it's an unproductive emotion- and I would imagine these beyond it. Imagine is more like what do you do about it? What works think about tomorrow. Night, yes, make anything, that's a blushes, my guess I kept kickin inside his hand. Of course you don't interesting about this apathy. Is there is a an app called translate

the translates from English into any other language in or into the major ones, and vice versa, and it works really fast or its really fast. We showed you out in it, Just imagine is fast now. Imagine also that you ve got you were up and you ve got your air you're airports him. How hard is it? Have your phone just translate in real time, just hold it up to the speaker and have just translate like like a star trek. Universal translator could be a delay, but with five g, if you put the say you put Amazon's cloud computing on it or Google And you give me five g speed, says essentially instant and I just hold it up to a native speaker, a Spanish I think it could translate. I think you could translate in real time couldn't

really clubs real time, maybe two or three second delay sunlight that been doing that since twenty seventy yeah, you is it it's. It's been, do a ball for several years, but not really well isn't reach them. Good lovely at bus, almost five gb before them, but here's a provocative thought I put them in, beginning all these little health apps useful you something will say, hey, you better, take a drink of water tissue dehydrated. Now the first time phone tells you to take a drink of water because you're behind you may say to yourself? I'm busy I'll get to it. But sometimes you might take to drink water, and they say yourself. Oh, I do feel better put me up a little bit. I guess this act was right. I needed to guess mortar.

eventually the apple tree, so useful that will feel you just like you can't say now. There will very quickly become a point where you're you're, a health apps train you to do what they tell you. It's gonna tell you to take. A walk is going to tell you that go to sleep is go. Tell you what to eat. Tell you! The lesson is gonna. Tell you sit up, it's gonna tell you, did too hydrate is gonna. Tell you went to take your pills and a first is just gonna be convenient. It's just gonna be convenient

but eventually it will just control you because it will train you like a dog to do whatever intelligent, because if you follow the directions, the aid, I long enough, it will train you to do the next thing. You tells you because you get in the boat is like. Oh, my I told me to take a drink. Take drink. It works every time, it's good! For me, I'm not doing a buzz. Keziah told me, I'm doing it because it's good for me. We are going to be treated like dogs. Respond to ai and we'll do it ourselves, cuz. We don't think it's that important. You just think you're doing what makes sense dehydrated it told me. I took a drink eventually, you'll do anything that tells you cuz. It's been right so far, Texas versus the federal government and Joe Biden so taxes governor as a band,

any vaccine mandates in Texas. But, of course the federal government says the opposite, so southwestern Americans are both going to follow the the federal guidelines. Not these state guideline, an interesting fight, an interesting fight, so not much to say about that. Except will watch that develop and I feel, like I feel, like the market should be taking care of this hopefully oh God, Supreme Court. Maybe federal mandate has not been issued just stated, but I think that companies probably want to get ahead of it. The companies would play comply just on the statement before its before its official. I would think now disabling Noah

Percentage of pilots are walking out war or pretending their second. Whenever I don't know a percentage nudism, it's not a big percentage rate. So MRS Forty percent, I don't think so thirty percent. I think the number that would actually Walker would be less than ten percent and an if it's two percent- that's not gonna. Surprise me I'll feeling is thirty or forty, and these could be undertaken. Closer to Irish Sean says. Here's a study group decided this right. The study that data is garbage and also that it doesn't show causation see if I can open up, doesn't show polarization causation of of which topic was that I cant open that right

but was the group to study about the re infection or about a mile Cardenas speech? Shooting is irregular. Part of archery makes sense. Pilots are turning out overtime. Work is not is not the sickness or time off many or close to retirement and maybe just using their sick leave before retiring effort that moved allied, somebody says: well, did you lie, or just refer to studies, and maybe the studies are wrong. Boo update I'll have that later. Alright, that's all for now. I've got to go. Do some other things, and I will talk to you,