Not to go down well well. Well, well, look! What just happened. Can you believe it. You know. What I'm talking about is that you all showed up here on time, for what will probably be the highlight of your whole life today show yeah. You know the rescue life might have had some good highlights. Like I say you know your wedding, nor the birth of your children. Those good do yadda yadda yadda, but this this is meaning. This is the best thing that ever happened in every universe in any manner verse virtual, our or other period, it's called coffee was got atoms and nothing is better than And if you want to go to yet another level got another level yeah. Who wants to take it to another level? All of you

All you need is a cover Margaret Glass, a tanker Palestine. I can't each other flask of vessel of any kind hello. They ve ever look what I like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine here today. The thing that makes everything better, especially your anti bodies. That's true. one simple coffee will enlighten Ura antibodies, give them a little energy if you have uncoordinated anti bodies, while you just naked, I walk around, make it less, gives some coffee until those anybody's go. Can you feel a little bit more active? I think you can. I think you can goosebumps why You feel those antibodies now wakened up truth. They go to sleep at night. Another way,

Well, here's the biggest news, with eyes grew rain. Now that doesn't seem like big news to you wherever you live, but I live in California is gonna rave, oh god, that's good, apparently, is gonna. Write a lot like shit tolerating come our way like lots, lacerated well. can't get enough. That's good news, so Like it, when problems sort of solve themselves we have an oh sure there might be some mudslides, pessimists pessimists like about money. Yeah there might be mudslides, but I'd rather have water. Well, here's the thing moves away from the fake news, see that has a good dose of fake news, I'll read the what they wrote and then you tell What is the fake bark? Ok, what is the fake part of this.

there is then says, to those of the Pfizer bubble. Corona virus vaccine was found to have a high efficacy could well. I got it. You take a little aside, Can we all agree on? One thing I know were, There's a lot of division in the country might even be a little division on this live stream, but if there is one thing we All agree on please, as that: pronouncing the word, efficacy is really fun. It makes you feel good when you said they should feel smart try it try to home to say out loud efficacy did you feel it does not, like other words, this fund, to say if it makes you feel like you're, really on top your game, if you can pronounce efficacy, nice

You look like you're. Well, practically the scientist now you're, not any virologist, probably, but you just learned to say efficacy, just right. Why why? Back to my story, a fake news from sea and then booster doses, Pfizer above the locker over virus vaccine was found to have a high efficacy of ninety five point. Six percent. And thus interface, retrial and the company announced that the efficacy. was consistent, irrespective of age, sex, race, ethnicity, co, morbid conditions are like this new world co morbid conditions, because I've been saying come or co more benefit is co. Morbidity is is a cool word is no is no efficacy. I think we can agree on that, but I like saying it Saunders ache.

Morbid conditions. Now, Tibet, we sell smart. I what's the figures. What's the fake news, anybody anybody was the fake news. I'm gonna take it as true. Let's say I will stipulate that the ninety five point: six percent efficacy is accurate, but what's the faint part where's the fake news come on? You know, you know word is nobody really. I thought this would be would be easier. All right, let me tell you it's not the day, one efficacy that nobody cares about. Am I wrong. Who is it? Who is really obsessing about day? One efficacy. It's not a day. One efficacy story is. Fast. As aware off story, am I wrong

worry is how long it lasts unless not in the story, because obviously they can't know that, because its new, this is the this is just disgusting. News does aims; they lead you to believe that the thing they told you as the important thing is not is that I'm is great, that the efficacy of thy is actually present and you ever came up with this- the same courage shot. I don't like to call the vaccine for reasons you understand, but is a miracle I mean. If it does, this is kind of a miracle. So it's it's amazing, but certainly it doesn't kill you. But I feel, like they didn't tell us the actual story, because that's the part that matters how long it lasts. Now they don't know, but I feel like they have to at least mention it

How many of you saw me interview Bjorn Lomborg, so I did that not on a livestream. I did an unrecorded interview, so I can have a proper to screen situation without tax info and thus thus posted new on Youtube. So, just search for, if you just search for beyond lump Borg and my name pop right up and really should take the time you should take the time. Let look at the the comments you ll see, the people enjoy a lot and very similar in the say, is, is to to allow things to see from Michael Kellenberger sort of aid. The smarter way to look at two climate. and nuclear energy and stuff like that, but More has been saying this for a long time. It has been done on this for a long time and he's just a great explained.

So if you want to see somebody who understands statistics and business and risk management, you gotta see Lamorak, so I dont like let let me let me say this as clearly as possible. I dont really enjoy interviewing other people, because the fun bar is what I'm talking, but I am also completely aware that you're nodded it for my fun You don't watch this because I'm having father you you're you're, looking for some benefit for yourself, quite naturally, it does seem to me that the especially the author interviews, I begin, cannot give some I did some careers advice when we take a positive and he's in career advice than necessary.

This is serious questions, clear advice, I don't love interviewing authors because of the homework kind of have to read the book right I mean I have to, but it is a reasonable courtesy and expectation, especially as a recorded interview and you're. Just to do that. With the author, you gotta regatta read the book so reading books in an interview. People is no ten. harder than what I like to do every day, which is this. I don't know if you can tell, but I wouldn't do this just for fun, and literally literally, this experience is purely fun. For me,. But the author interviews take me more concentration work. However, I think they're more useful I hears apart.

I can only say in public, because I have no sense of shame whatsoever, which is a big advantage in life. I say something that nobody should say out loud if they had any sense of dignity or shame or your self preservation, I understand this could say it out loud. I think I'm the best in the world interview people you'd, give just have to deal with that for a moment now. I don't know that to be true right. If I certainly about it, I'd be crazy, but based on my experience, who just interview in the future, people. I don't think anybody doesn't the way. I do it and I think it s more to do with the way I do it. Then you know some natural quality. I possess or something like that. So it's not, Much about being awesome and that's the part that keeps people from saying something like that and public. I actually think I might be the best in the world

and I dont know why exactly could be- that I dont have as much partisanship could be, that the windows that I used to look at things are a little bit different or something. Summer says Joe Rogan in his beat debate. Let me make a statement, leave no ambiguity here whatsoever, I'm way better than Joe Rogan envious. People, it's not even close Joe Rogan, is assured in which you know you ve got three hours of content and he's great, as this may be the best ever, maybe the best ever. If you just look at his successes audience and the impact the as I think you could say, Georgians show is the best ever of anything in that genera. But in the narrow question,

I'm just doing an interview, you don't do a three hour interview. You can do with three hours, a content. Yeah I've been any, doesn't great, but an interview needs to be shorter right. So if you're, just gonna do one one interview, forty five minutes is a lot for an interview. A narcissist compensates with false bravado. Are we talk about something else? Love me, but you can call me a narcissist. Do that would be fine, but just be specific. Grandiose narcissist, not a vulnerable narcissist was far, as I know, couldn't how about that? But as far as I know, on on the kind of nurses likes to get stuff done, and then, if I get credit for that s great, I like it but I, but I need to do things that are legitimately useful for other people or I don't get anything so.

moving along all right. I see your comment, but what was the answer that should I do were authorised use one question or move. Should I do more author interviews? Local? platform says absolutely yes, yes, yes away. For a moment, you Youtube's a little man No? No! Yes! Now! Yes, yes, shells! No! No! No! ok in a question like this. Only the essence matter. Here's a little lad tip for you about how to judge public opinion on entertainment, stuff. This is a really good. Tipp learn this annual you'll have something to take with you, some looking at the Youtube messages and is a mixture of yeses and knows so. Why should that tell me about whether I should do this

it's an absolute yes based on the feedback, because it doesn't matter how many people say now. This is the key learning. It doesn't matter how many people wouldn't watch it has nothing to do with whether you should do it. The only thing that matters is how many would a lot of people if set if five billion people hate you, but a billion people love you you're a pretty good position. If you get a billion people on your side in the five billion Asia, so has nothing to do with how many people don't want to watch you irrelevant. So also I on the Barnes yesterday, you should google that those a fun if you miss the on and bar you're gonna want at least stay How I addressed the first troll who had a comment.

Cause, I might have lost my, I might have lost my composure. So if you like, if you like to watch things, were people lose their composure? You want to watch out I like it, while the Big news today is a trumpet launching a social media network called truth, social media. They're saying there so far: it's their opening for a beta beta users, so so trumps network will be open for a beta users there is some suggestion that later conservatives will also be able to use it, but for now apparently have to be a beta to use it so assemblages, all mostly Democrats,

am I reading too much into those o o o a beta? I'm sorry, I misinterpreted this is. Is the technology is the beta? It's a technology that ok, I thought it was just for babies. One of my weirdest predictions: like the about Ray come true, I'm not sure yet, so I don't have confidence in it. But here is one of my weirdest predictions. Tromp would lose money as president and make it back after he was out of office and intent. and more so when everybody said, I think really for president is really bad for your company and it was. It was terrible for the drum company. I assume you know it's private company, but one assumes looking from the outside. It was just couple for business, but now is launched this new media platform. I assume as equity right.

I see that a reporting on the degree of equity that tramples versus as partners think I've seen that, but one assumes he has good chunk of equity and what is the best way to become a multibillion era. The United States is less somehow tromp managed to have equity in the type of company. Now we don't know one will work per se, but in the type of company that makes you a multibillion air right away, he could be one year away from being. One of the richest people in the country again and I always assume that he would find a way to monetize. You know his reputation and everything else, and maybe this is it you you carefully. Better than ie newish platform succeeding, I think the odds are always against it, but he's bring something that nobody of.

Brought before, which is himself and if people just sign up just silly and see what you say. If he runs for president, which seems likely and the only place you can see the good stuff is on his his platform. You have to sign up is the only place you can see. His like extra good stuff is up his own platform. Every report, there s a sign up. Basically every pundit everybody, I'm sure. You'll have to sign up. So he does have a kind of a perfect set up, which doesn't mean is gonna succeed, but the setups gonna perfect I've already put my name so others a site where you can go to to sign up to be invited or not. So I put it money I was looking at a year Michaels Berger tweet talking about Gretta Tunbridge, who was

in the past us end quote. I want you to panic, so Gretta and, of course,. the people literally wanted people to panic about climate change stuff and unfortunately, I think they succeeded looks like they succeeded in getting people to panic, some sort of a be careful. What you wish for situation, because I've said the best I've said the best situation. If climate change is really as dangerous as people say, or any version of it is, you need a little bit of panic. Don't you, like other, there's some productive amount of fear that get you to do the right things, so you you're not in trouble in the future, but maybe we overshot the mark. We may have over panic it's hard to know what is it

about a panic. Well, I think it's time to fire PETE both judge and I'm unreasonably pro Buddha judge and am also reasonably not reasonably. I'm pro paternal. leave right where one one o threaten the other, the idea that people can have parental leave But at the same time it is maybe the biggest problem in the country, and I don't think anybody in charge are they is anybody in charge. I saw on Twitter somebody saying that the. The secretary of Transportation is not really the person whose the right person to fix the tracking slash problem that you can. Somebody tell me that justice,

The question is: is Buddha, judge does even have the portfolio and the power to be in charge of this problem because it that's a good question. Right? And if it's not him, who is it. And if you don't know who it is the biggest problem, not the president present doesn't seem involved anyway. Who is working on the biggest problem? I feel like booty judges taken some response. Only four hasn't somebody says power, yes, but portfolio. Now I think that's the right answer. I think the answer is that booted judge could take control of it. He could sort of I'm sure he can get by them to assign him the job of transportation, bazaar of tracking and logistics or something so,

I think you're right. That maybe is his job. Description is not exactly on point, but a crisis seems like you would be the one that you'd pick now. Let me ask you this: if Trump were president, how would this supply chain problem look different. I feel I trump would solve this by now. I also feel a hashtag coming on slaughter but something along the lines of Trump would have solved this by now, because it you look at the border problem, Trump put us all by now. Further a few things that we see that just look like obviously Trump would be the better choice, if only because he would be engaged in Biden doesn't seem to be. Let look at what Trump might have done. I would just speculating here because we don't know, but

Here's something you might have done Trump might have fired somebody right Might have fired somebody got enough. That's Buddha judges, somebody else, but I think you have to fire. Somebody like, I feel it now, maybe there's nobody was quite on point to be the right one to fire, but nobody to fire. Then at least you need to pick as are to be in charge, say, have somebody to fire later right. I think trot would have written some executive orders to override some any state regulations that were slowing things down I now I've heard things such as there are not enough trucks because of environmental concerns of old trucks and California. Do you think Trump consult that problem? One, oh just says temporarily. You can use any any you you just just temporarily, because this crisis, you know thing trumpeted done, that

just sign something says: has temporarily we're not gonna worry about. California's your regulations could be that's trucks, just don't exist, yeah, maybe the older trucks of Anti commission. Whatever else, Maybe there's just no play their other no, but why don't? We know that, because Norway's in charge nobody in the government, whose I'm in charge. Let me give you an update. Here's what we're doing here's was wrong with identified the problem. Here's the solution were working on my take us little time, but we ve identified the problem. Somebody's in charge. Here is the solution. We we think war, whereas all that right, whereas all of that, at the very least I think a Trump administration will be. keeping you up to date on what the hell's happening or even tell you what the problem was so over, there

everybody for days now describe what exactly is the problem and luckily people, or well informed the number of people who work in the field and are involved logistics. Some of them have interviewed employees The dogs and with all this information. Finally, finally, I got really clear detailed answer to why things are slowing down. Unfortunately, all if they really clear detailed answers of why they supply chain isn't working, we're dead. that's right. Lots of experts waited and people really know that their actually working on it right now. The people in the field doing logistics doing leash,

your unloading, the people who are close to they really now, and so they told me what the problem was. Lots of all different was sent me What's it mean when everybody knows the problem, but they have. A different answer was sent me well The smallest amount it means is that there's something going on. you don't it feels like. I don't think it is. So don't take this as a conspiracy. Let me tell you what feels like coming actually save anybody else's as they think what what I feel like the problem, not really there's no evidence in this, but what I feel like boom

TIM America locals got the right answer war. It feels like when the twin towers guy here or there, let's and he didn't quite know who is doing in there who is behind it. It feels like war specifically, You can take it to the next level, so wars right answer taken less level gimme. Another detail on that somebody says China Gimme another Retail are not as a non lodgings theirs.

Oh allegation, I'm just saying how it feels there there's one thing, I'm looking for her. I haven't Syria. There we go, somebody got it, I knew it. I knew you get it David and they gave a set of first locals looks like a cyber attack I'll even take it to another level except Cyber close enough looks like an eye attack one leg: just do your brain. Right. First, I've heard that I don't think anybody else's mention. feels like a I attack, so it feels Now I would not allege that because I think that you'd have to have some kind direct evidence to say that, but

If we ever get an AI attack, what's it going to look like it's going to look like a whole bunch of things seem to stop working right at about the same time is going to look like. We can't quite identify the source of the problem. Systems are working, but the thing is that used to be smooth just stopping smooth, and we don't know why. Now again, let me be very clear: I am not alleging that this is some kind of a attack, I'm only alleging that it would feel and look exactly like this I don't think you know you'd be attacked when you think of an AI attack, you think they're going to turn the lights off or you think they're going to let you know, break the hydroelectric dam or something yeah you think of it like, earth attack, but I think I would attack without tell you there attacking what's the point of having artificial intelligence system. It's done right. You don't want double,

that's no good, a smart. I wouldn't tell you it's attacking what it be a sneak attack So today I tat was worth anything would be a sneak attack because you don't want you know some kind of response, what I do their brains today because for the first time you realize that in again I'm not saying this is my eye tat the We realise that this is what I would look like and how it would feel is really disconcerting. Isn't it great disconcerting. no spirit living at a little meet that and the way they attack, which would work, would be, He just to hit enough systems that are related to the same process, in this case the supply chain to have enough misinformation and enough persuasion just inserted at the right.

it's the several things seem to be breaking at the same time and then they would know. Why Everything is just a little bit broken, nothing exploded. Just everything is a little bit broken and then the supply changes goes crazy. nurse wake. Had our story today in which they referred to the fine people hoax, but linked to an article that seem to treat it like. It was true now I was informed that news. We did in fact put the clarifying statement in there that transcend he wasn't talking about the NEO Nazis, but in it in its entirety and with the link there still spreading the fine people, oaks and twenty twenty one, the most. bump hoax of all time, still being at least couched in a way that their making it look like maybe withdrew, based on the linked linked article and.

So I said to myself: how can you not know that twenty twenty one, so I googled it- Google just use Google and Google fine people hoax? and put a plus in front the hope, so you make sure that an article should comes up the says hoax do you know, come up articles. I say it's true and don't have the word hoax him. Now. I only do this quickly, so I didn't confirm this, but I think that's true. I think the top searches for the thing that requires the word hopes to be it don't have the word hopes in it. You have to go down pretty far to get something from politico or from me

Try yourself and just can somebody confirm that so this is an unconfirmed claim and claiming because I didn't open all the articles, but I doubt those articles had the word hawks in a kind of doubt. It feels like their artificially pinned the top, not sure, but it looks like. So do you know rubber everywhere, no rubber, rice, economist and democratic? His super partisan, twitter, pretty active on social media at airs. My problem with him. I think it's because he's an economist, the I have more problems with his bias Then I do with other peoples you if you see a politician or somebody's workin for a politician and were clearly an activist.

And they say things that are just amazingly biased and one sided and basically just looks like a lie. You say these are well there politician or their working for a politician is sorted discounted as being just ridiculous. But one when a famous you release notable economist, says something you you try to think well, listen! Maybe he's right! that, but he is so insanely biased that it just disgusts me when I see his teeth, because I hate to see somebody was of economists like thro his entire profession, under a boss. If you're an economist- and you can't tree things objectively, you need to give your degree back right. You should just give it back because you didn't earn an economics degree. If you can't even attempt to be a little unbiased.

I saw you treated me said: there's something talking about the the or to strengthen the voting rights. They got rejected so Congress rejected, but there were enough people to have gotten a majority, but not enough to be, filibuster, think most of Euro well educated and the process. But if anybody isn't most bills. You can get passed with a simple majority, fifty one percent order before some things. You need more than that of a super majority. If you're trying to be a filibuster, filibusters, just one party- usually, I think always the minority Party just trying to use the procedural rights to talk forever to delay things until you, you can't get anything past and Russia's things as he says he tweets, there's something terribly wrong with the system than low forty one Senate Republicans, representing only twelve

one percent of the country to block voting rights. Legislation supported by nearly seventy percent of Americans, the filibuster Moscow car he so slimy I saw a slimy I hears. The problem is How many of Americans, We understand. What's in the voting rights bill, what do you think He's a seventy percent in favour this bill. How many of you think know what's in the bill, zero zero Democrats always make complicated bills. I can understand the infrastructure bill. Three point: five trillion. How many Americans knew what was that zero how many people know what's in Leah the Voting rights bill, none and nobody

so robber rage. You slimy piece of shit, yo, suggesting that somehow seventy percent of Americans wanting this morning voting rights in general is somehow in favour of this specific bill. This is not the and you know it so well- somebody lie when this is just look. Well lies, maybe the wrong word here. The same persuade in such a biased way. It just discredits economists, and I hear that the economy- certainly not right over time, but that only this, so Here's the Democrats have a two pronged strategy and that that's that's pretty info. The first progress is to get rid of the film of us here,

we'll talk about that right. So Democrats are the party in power, but they can't get things done, because this Doorn filibuster the republic gave using so step. One is love. Democrats want to get rid of filibustering step. One of their clever plan. Step to other plan is due. actual one thing after another, until the party empowers Republicans so step one. Here's a wherever the party in power is all the power in Europe by getting really filibuster, step to make sure that the other parties in power and has all their power with no filibuster, as that was happening, am I wrong. am I wrong right that they explicitly have those two goals, while the first one is explicit guerrilla filibuster, but it does look like

Every single force is suggesting that the republic is already take power right, Emilius Congress in twenty twenty two, so shouldn't getting rid of the filibuster, be really close to the last thing. They would walk right now, What do you support a party that has this is their plan to give all the power to the other side? I'm not. This up, you see the same thing. I see right you that there is no good there's no debate on these two facts. Democrats want to get rid of the filibuster, many of them once the ones we see talking public at the same time is pretty clear that performance we're getting at the Democrats will put Republicans in power. They know that too, don't they don't. They know that maybe the dough

So here is a sea then helping the public understand what's in the bill. Finally, there was a complicated bill stuff in it and I'd like to understand their better and so for the benefit of my viewers. Here, I'm gonna Red CNN description, so there. all of you will finally know what's in this complicated Billy ready. This should for all of your questions as written. The current compromise version this one mansion put together, of the bill would establish national rules for running elections, sounds good limit partisanship in the drawing of congressional districts looks good, looks good and force a disclosure many anonymous donors who spend beg to influence elections. I like that pretty good Brady.

Other provisions were aimed at alleviating concerns from local effect election officials, who were is that their isabel would have them too difficult to implement, occasionally simplified good and some new additions were aimed at insulating nonpartisan know what that means. Blah blah blah. It also includes a number of changes by mansion blah blah blah. a provision that would limit the not prohibit state voter idea requirements. Do you think you know enough about the bill now? There have been no, no, not even close Basically see those are like brushing the top of it, they buy they might as well, have named the parts of the bill awesome.

everybody loves. How would you like a bill we're going to fill it with awesome things that everyone love? Oh, don't ask the details now, don't ask about the details, don't ask how it will be implemented, what the what the cost of it is, what the side effects will be or distort eight dollars that it's just called the awesome bill that everybody loves with things that the? U want, that's all you need to know. Don't you All these details about was good or bad about it or a lad. It's just also build that everybody loves them democratically. Everything we want. There is a reason that our system is a republic. You remember what it was anybody else.

Why is our system a republic and not a pure democracy this this? This is. Why, because public here understand this stuff. So if our elected officials go an area that they have a better chance of understanding that doesnt work so well, either but others arisen were republic. You see the video of Jeremy Rifkin Democrat, interrogating a republican maggots about the January six stuff. It's a pretty good clip certificate. A chance. I think I tweeted. today so Rasselas, really going Harding maggots challenging him to does he believe that Trump won the election or not? Now too,

credit MAC Gates, is out of each other's by you, who is a theme, is like a state champion on his high school debate too. I may have the detail that wrong for something like that, like maggots, is super that debating things and holding his own and in exactly this kind of situation. However, I think I think he blew his his chance on this. He did better than most probably a top five percent answer that are the most and certainly showed showed that yes, the the child to be less situation, but I feel I can here's how I would have answered it. Ok, sir to paraphrase Yale thing,

but a centrally rescue was saying you know all these course rejected the evidence. So how can you say that maybe the election was an affair when so many courts rejected all the Evans? Now what maggots tried Do we suggest that course are not the right tool for for evaluating the claims, because most of them were rejected on grounds of whether it was an appropriate one? appropriate whether the courts, where the right vehicle for the complaint was the word standing, guess standing. So the complaints did not meet the legal legal standard for standing, meaning that it wasn't the right people taking the right to complain to the right cork Zat close enough.

It wasn't the right people taking the right kind of a complaint to the right court. So we now ran a situation where the right people took the right complained to the Red court, although sometimes I think they did but in general a lot of things were rejected by standing, so Maggie tries to give that answer. How was that answer? True So my guess is answers was accurate and right on point. Also a complete failure. Persuasion, wise! So accurate and being right on point and being confident and all the things he did right, because he did a right not even close to being good enough. Here's. What good enough would look like Put me in my guess is Chair Jaber who says you know Scott Adams, that no court and listen. Of course, in a number of claims and if they ve all been turned down here, What do you think about that? Scott? No court, no court. Here's the right answer!

like to understand your question. Better Mister Ruskin. There seems to be an embedded assumption in your question. I just need a clarification. Can they get a clarification of the question? Are you suggesting that the courts would be the right place to, values- the claims the rascal would say something like you all course rejected it? They all rejected. He produced repeal himself You say I know you're, therefore, and I agree with everything you're saying I'm looking for your assumption? Is your assumption that the courts where the right vehicle to evaluate clay because the court said they weren't, You know all the ones you mentioning. Are you aware that MR ask him? Data clarification. You are aware that court said they're, not the right vehicle for this right Saddam. Confuse. Why you're asking the question.

were you aware that right? you. You could basically end rascal right there, but you have to do it by asking for clarification You need to put him on his heels. Here's what met gates got wrong. He entered Redskins frame, he entered his frame, rascally painted a box and then invited yeah, linguistically he painted a box and invited magnates to get into his box, which was a kill box, and that gaze walk right into the kill box. Well, armed well, armed because Maggie's is really really good at this stuff, but he walked into the kill box. Don't walk into the kill box?

never never to enter his frame. You gonna break his frame. He he offered to frame you say, need clarification on that cause. There there's an assumption that embedded in your question that that I need to understand, because my assumption wouldn't make your question makes sense, but maybe you can explain to the public. Why that the court's didn't think there were the re vehicle for this but but you still do this is something that you know that all those judges don't know Jamie arrested. I mean or Jeremy there What sixty some judges, who all think that they were not appropriate vehicles for this question, but you still think they were then explain that.

Sure I'm go! Ok. How many of you think my answer would be better. If you can be brutal, you can be brutal if you think it doesn't snarling close right now. Let me ask you another question: Except for the part where I would never run for president, because I don't want them looking into my life and tearing me apart, there would be a suicide mission. I can be present.

Because there is a skill set for this sort of stuff that I possess. Maggots has that skill set like really really good, but you you get taken down by by the media so far Antonov Hill recover, but he doesn't have. He doesn't have my level output Maggie's as a either the ten on communication, which is higher than almost everybody. But I am a ten. I am a ten. There are tens, I think Chomsky, ten jobs at ten absolutely, and let me be clear: if not because of some genetic quality I possess. I'm not saying I'm good at this, because I somehow born born with Taliban now it is. The skill is low really just a skill. You could study I've studied it

are you and studied it as much as many could do what I do Let me give you an example. The same problem was the state like sort of it. By the way, if you don't know, I use them for all my examples for someone He says every example like story. Why something something about the nature of him leave has lots of stories if my exerted, which wanted to be president again you'd, have to subtract out whatever you think The press would talk about these past, so neither he nor I really legitimate possibilities for the president, but does he have the skill set to do what I just told you met gaze? He should have done this How much would you like to have seen bike sort of edge answer? Jeremy, rascals question in public

who would have been different one of indifferent different you can, you can talk about, All the reasons that here I our unqualified for other reasons but communication wise his attempt supply chain trump. What affects us I feel like there could have been the warp speed version for tracking. I do so. The number one reason I get for their supply chain problems. Is that the learned enough trucks and truckers? I'll think Trump would have already as spun up a warp speed for tracking and how hard Howard gonna be Howard, gonna, be to do warp, speed and say. Well it we got a problem here, but in three weeks you can have a shitload of trucks and jockers there. Definitely enough on employee.

people want jobs. You could definitely temporarily gives them you emergency pay to make it worthwhile. You could definitely give people who would be willing to be trained, because maybe the training is free, because right now I think f o correct me. If I'm wrong, I need a fact check this everybody and, in fact check this trucker school costs me. The people do have another. There were certain they're people want to be truckers, but they can't afford it because the tracking school costs money how do I know that? How do Scott know that trucking school costs money and the people whom I want to be truckers? we have that money. The reason I know that, as I once paid for somebody's gotta trucking school, do you know I did.

Cuz, there was no way in the world that he ever could have gotten the money together, it's right, so I've actually paid. I don't know if you went. I remember I offered but offered to pay for somebody to going driving school because it wasn't a problem he could solve figure out how to make money to make money. So I thought well, I can kick started. And I don't remember how much in the few thousands to somebody have a number for the world. here can certainly do little research and put it in the comments. What does it cost to go to tracking school? I see three gay I see fiftieth it wasn't fifty I see five gay. My memory was five gay I've seen five game or levels

how many truckers can spend, how many people are unemployed or looking for new job could spend 5k to get a job that might be temporary and doesn't sound too good in the first place. He'll hard problems have to self not hard. It's one executive order and as one emergency funding in the short term, now the seriously let living Lily s back up it s, a question: you don't think Trump would solve this. By now I mean I'm not sure I quite understand the problem, which is also part of the problem, but if any part of it is that we don't have enough trained truckers really sure that would be solved by now. Just pay them to go to school now would probably do it just pay for the classes

now there is a secondary question of enough trucks. California has some kind of environmental rule that sort of mothballed a bunch of truck, Could any of those trucks be put back in production temporarily, probably maybe they have to steal parts from one truck to build a good truck one good truck at three Why feel like? These are all things you could do with executive order and a big wallet no, there's no, there's no way to know the have done better job on this right. There's the things we do know he would apply globally fired somebody's asked by now right and the country would feel good about that, because we kind of needs to see somebody get fired. Like it's not like. I have some kind of blood lust.

and I don't even have a bad feeling about your PETE Buttigieg. I think he has a lot of talents as a lot to offer. I think, but I think you probably do steelfire Yet if he was one really, you should have been doing any of us or recommending writing the eel forbidden to sign what is even writing in the over him to do. You know how the Trump executive orders got written different way, right, but generally people who understood things and needed something said article write you a first draft. Firstly, your lawyers look at it, but what Are you the first raft in these look like this lawyers? Look out at it who is doing that for binding who is giving violent executive orders first drafts says: look this. This could be good. If we put this in good order, you don't get it Lord up.

I think what you see a says, trumpeter fixes by now. That's what I think very that looks to be what I want. talk about today. Why care more women? Be truckers, don't know if there is any issue with that is you can think of all the usual reasons why they might not wanting it into the business. faint news. Truckers can be trained in two weeks. I think that's true. So he said there, truckers can be claimed in two weeks is fake news. Coming from me, what is it? What is the right amount of time,

If anybody is been trained or going to truckers school, what would be the amount of time to train trucker? I say two weeks in an emerging two in emergency two weeks, yet I am abstaining three to four weeks as normal, so how many people would disagree with me six months three months, the actually know what you're talking about our interests I think the most people say four weeks now feels right, I think, is a forward course that emergency you could do in too. I think they're, probably a lot of people who you maybe have some experience. It doesn't take him the forum for four weeks, convoy, Convoy, I also wondered: let me just throw something out there: you're housemaid trained with you pay us a couple of weeks gas

different problem? Let me ask you this: we ve always products at the ports. I guess or unloading, allow the products from these shipping containers and putting them. Temporary warehouses until they can get enough trucks. Is there a play where we could discuss those goods and just sell them at the port? No miss probably impractical, but I just wonder let us just work through this. Let's say you heard that there are a whole bunch of shipping. Containers with ILO televisions, bunch anew new 4k tvs, And there's all shipping container and they just can't get another truck and. Hey that the company who purchase them for whatever retail purpose says: look, can you let us labelling will sell it right under the container.

If you let us sell it out of the container. Like will just stand there with a credit card reader, you just take one out, take one other container I'll. Just put your credit card in here. You just put on your truck and take it home. Give you a thirty percent discount thirty percent discount. If you put on your truck and take it home, it would be a total bottleneck, traffic nightmare, globally? Probably our limit limit? Let me open up again: is there no way to get those containers to some place where it wouldn't be a bottleneck such as putting a container on one smaller ship now EU propaganda them? I'm just

brain? Sorry, I'm sure people thought of all these things and rejected them for one reason or another, but I think we gotta get creative and I'm not sure any things happening. So here's a broad here's, my main problem. Everything else is speculation. the main problem. Is that the binding demonstration as no led face telling us what's happening every day? I we re in somebody to tell us what's happening every day now and be write about it.

Use FED Ex Ante PS offices. Well, don't that would work the highways of the bottleneck now and I think they are well maybe just round the ports that couldn't you know, trucks in California, because no independent contractors in California and I've heard that issue there's something about you have to be an employee to drive a truck in California goes there, want independent contractors to be cheap. Other taxes were again. How easy would that be the fix with an executive order right, every one of these problems no apply in an emergency I was saying that during the pandemic, when the trumpeters doing he owes a lot of people say what you can't do that here do this. He can't do that, and I can say the same thing in a crime

she could do anything? There are no rules of a crisis except that it's a year, whatever you doing makes sense. The only rule that makes sense in the crisis is. Does this look like it'll work that everything else doesn't matter? You can get rid of ESA here you have to be an war footing exactly. Yeah yeah you'd have to suspend OSHA, you probably have to suspend a whole bunch of stuff, but temporarily, it's all is all doable temporarily. It looks like I wise everybody talking to the user s legs, apparently there's a troll, overhear them seriously on the Youtube. Alright, that's all I got for now and I will talk to you tomorrow. I know you can't wait you're already looking forward to it. You know you are see you tomorrow.