Well, hello, everybody guess what its time it's time for the best part. Of your whole day, I'm not saying the rest. Your day will be not good, might be asked. But, no matter how awesome it is no matter how awesome yes, this will. The highlight- and are you wondering if this sort of thing can improve your antibodies well Into a thing called science. Yes, a lot you furtive within called placebos right. That's right! A placebo works quite often not as well as the druggist compared to a few do things right,

Placebos were so, what does that tell you about the ability of your mind to influence your health outcomes, pretty good, pretty good unless it's just a statistical data problem, but I think there's play happily there. Secondly, we know for sure that if you're more relaxed and less stressed, you'll produce less if you're more relaxed, you'll produce less of cortisol. The stress chemical in the stress chemical makes your immunity to everything go down. So yes, one hundred percent guaranteed the people watching this Live stream will be healthier than other people, because you have the benefit of all this relaxing content, things that take the edge off things that make you feel better things that make you feel smarter and more capable more confident. You put all that together with that duty or anti bodies. I think you know, I think you know.

Well, there was a recent study. They showed that zero people watching. My life soon have died of covered. I don't think, that's a coincidence. Do you I would like to take it up a notch. I know you would have other about values cover among your glass? A tanker jealousies die the canteen, jogger flask of vessel guide fill it with a favorite liquid. I like coffee, enjoy be now for the paralleled pleasure

major day the thing that makes your antibodies line up and saying it's called the simultaneous sip, as is happening now. You know you can never tell what I'm completely serious get you, but I would bear a large amount of money that the people who watches live stream have better. Comes and people don't? I would bet that you remember during the height of the pandemic, when The public was scared to death, but many of you join me then and were were watching my content and when people were. The wheels are coming off. Everything is falling apart and I said now I know so much you'll be fine, you'll, be fine, then here's. Why don't you think you had less cortisol than other people

I think so cuz I don't. Actually I don't even know anybody else who was making a chill out content at the time. Probably just me I mean, if you could think of somebody. Let me know, but it's real. It's real people you get healthy. When you watch the always talk about all the things are happening. Shall we. Rasmussen has, above all about her doktor of algae. The forty six percent of the likely voters. Bold walls, fell cheated. forced to resign. Forty six percent is that good or that bad everybody? Anybody is that good or bad for doktor, factually forty, six percent of whom want you to resign. Forty six percent is the percent that we want everybody to. basically, as a universal number, forty percent

the country once every famous person who works for the government to resign, how many people want to Eo Cedar, reside or be forced to resign. Forty, six percent, how many people the thing to present should be forced to resign. I mean there are more people would dislike it. Maybe you think he should be forced to use. about forty six percent. I read this. I think to myself. After all the trouble the south she has gotten into and gotten out of and gotten into again all the criticism. The number.

I want him to be fired, is about to save as everybody else. Apparently we are completely immune to any kind of data or analysis, but boy. Do we like me how team will be allowed? A team of forty six percent is pretty much like the universal number of people who want somebody else to resign. Somebody famous- I don't know why that's funny, but I've read that common in the comments on Youtube for Seven per cent of people polled Thick Alec Baldwin is actually a cowboy that's not far off. Let me give you my my current. I will answer Alec Baldwin and I like it That's because I would consider whom a political opponent adversary like to use those words were album

Team America by you'll, be on the other side politically from groups. What else happened, rear get some kind of unstable internet connection. That's not my locals feed, that's interesting, but only one of them had to fields The two fields of your turn, another one- would say if I can cause the stork technical problem been worked out. O permission denied, disinterested well I'll, see if I can reconnected

might be waited too long. You do people hold on some reason. It looks like it's working now interesting Stratus him rumble. Some so is blaming rumble air. There were back wasn't such problem after all, our I I was in the middle of say something so fascinating that I can't remember scenarios what I was saying before I got sidetracked. By way of noses and antibodies, it's real. What was I talk about? Tell me. Oh Anne Elliot Baldwin, I guess I did men are low. I think locals is backing the locals is backward. He looks like it is.

I've decided to Joe Biden is what I call the stem cell president, the stem Madam president, like this, if you didn't see we say it on Twitter, you don't like it you any. what is the process of the United States for replacing a vice president, not a president, but a vice president. What's the process, if less a vice president were to resign. or to be impeached or maybe a medical problem after leave. What would be the process while turns out the Biden would appoint somebody and then Congress would vote by a simple majority. Now not we're talking about one of succession, so it has nothing to do with pillows. Policy is who would take over if the first and second in command were incapacitated at the same time, we're not talking about that.

So forget about lot line of succession. That's that's not the conversation we're talking about how to replace place, a vice president just devices so vice president quits, let's say, and The present simply nominates another Democrat in this case and then because Democrats have a majority and also because historically the country like stem vice president, we don't like to go without a vice. present. So as long as as well The present nominate somebody who's, not horrible. Somebody use an ordinary person within that party. Generally, you can expect to get a quick agreement, maybe even from Republicans, who just are in favour of the idea of good continuity in and keeping tradition. So. Here is our situation. It looks like. Maybe

the people and by his team didn't really ever expect him to go for years. Can we all agree on that? May maybe they didn't know one way or the other, but they certainly weren't confident he could make all four years would. Would you give me that that they weren't coffin about it? They might have been optimistic You couldn't be confident about which means that Cobble Harris was always the backup plan. That's what the vice president is not now really shocking statement there, but I think they were surprised at how poorly sheep reforms I was, I pictured to be the nominee and I was shocked.

that, as soon as you took around over, let's say a well defined situation where she's your grilling people in Congress? Like a lawyer where she's quite good actually word debate, she wasn't abandoned the debates. Will you put her in any kind of free form situations? Just she just falls apart, and I think the Democrats can see it too. She seems to be the aim. Sized at the moment. So yes, I was- I was wrong about her being chosen as the top of the ticket. That is correct. I might not be wrong about the plan to put her in power, will see about that. But let's say this is respect let's say that the Democrats who are really pulling the power strings behind the scenes, they say to themselves, we can put anybody in the presidency, we want now because they can

All they have to do is find a reason for Kabul Harris to resign before binders. You see this plan, Why didn't just says to pick anybody who can get through Congress unnecessary being probably a pretty big menu of people? You can get approve? You know, I don't think he get, it could get you a o c or one of that one of the squad approved. Maybe not that way you can get an ordinary Democrat improved previously and effectively. The Democrats can take any they want for present from her right now, I'm not wrong valet, the Semi Gimme effect check can April can a vice president. Resign. Yes, is the process replace them that the present pick somebody new and Congress approved by a simple majority? That's important. They don't need two thirds, just a simple majority

However, an within his bite is likely to make your four years. Probably not. I don't even think his own team assumes that so We have created a situation. Where is the stem cell president? He can be turned into any president. They want whose also normal democratic area normal them How many people have ever thought of that before the display is right? Here is right in front of you if to say that if you see any moves for or calmly errors to leave the job, you don't know who your next presence could beat, but it won't be based on democracy, thus for her So that's interesting story about a Red, Hoffman, millionaire. Under of linked in the news, is one that paper mafia people, meaning one of those startup people on paper.

for Lincoln and Red, often teamed up with George Soros. You ve heard of him right anybody. Anybody, George Sirs, neither Billina. Another creating the media firm to quote combat disinformation- that's right Two billion areas are queuing up to tell us was true and what isn't to see any potential pro it was a decisive anybody, see any potential problem that looks good right: hey billionaires, trying to help us with information. Yes, it's nice that are going to help us under. and was true because I don't love, you knew this, but you don't know and they do or the people they hire will them an inch Finally, although apparently nobody in the world can figure was true these two

billionaires. I figured out how to get some people who do now. Apparently there are people who can tell what's true and they haven't been telling us. I hate those people think about it, There are people who know was true and they haven't been telling us. Why? Don't I people who know what's true tell us was true, instead of all the liars well awfully. red oftener than George Soros will solve that problem by getting I'm totally credible people that I'm sure you will believe to tell you what's true and what is it's called good information ink and they're gonna funds, Gale businesses, they quote, cut through the, jabers with fact based information fact based no more. This opinion crap no more of this conspiracy. Theory crap, we're going for fact, based information. Now.

It even plans to invest in local news companies We say a red flags. There. Billionaires owning the news, Well, there's a billion are the owns a new times, and it's not like their produce. Any fake knew what they are. The new retires bruises fake news in his own baby later. last year, but at least we have the Washington Post, because I put what the Washington Post Prince fake news is on by a billion or how can that be? How can there be cause billionaires? Don't give you bad information? That's not what they do. You think, so, Here's a use the example of why you should trust this entity. First, I was worried that maybe they were there, to be biased themselves.

Please check our road is about gas with jewel. She doesn't uses worse position, is all about talons tax. How interesting so there's a Joe Rogan Interview with Jewel that looks interesting in terms of understanding or systems for success, Back to my point, so one of the people was gonna, run this new good information and points out that they're not gonna, be all just left wing stuff. It's not gonna, be a bunch of just left wing stuff! No worry! No worry! And why the examples given of their fact based information process? Is she points to the bulwark of Europeans publication alive the bulwark as a centre right new site founded, Opposition to drop ISM as an example the type of centre right news outlets it could fund so just an example. They haven't hundred but

could fund something like the bulwark I've ever bork. if any of you seen in article from the bulwark, because I have. You know it's articles, I've seen from the bulwark, not a true one. Yet not now True one because the only time anybody sends me to read an article is when they are fake news, which has been, still enough that the only news. I've ever read in the bulwark was obviously untrue. Like I'm talking about the obvious hoaxes here, the Trump called neonazis fine people hoax here that the ones that you know her fake, just by looking at was like that's not true. That's what the bulwark is. If you would, if you said to me, name a bunch of fake news, that's these from this list. I would have picked them out immediately.

as one of the five new sources, so literally a famous fake news source, that's it Am I right the of how they won't be biased, guess I'll pick a faint new source this says, are on the right, but also criticizes the right with fake news. So don't worry, I've got this biasing taken care of. Why should you be worried the Red Hoffman as part of this, It was here. How informed you are about your billionaires says, be server, trivia, question, but useful I also read often unfounded linked in that's that's a fact, but that's not directly related to my point that I'm gonna make,

why? Why should you be worried specifically that red often is above what do we know about him? Besides billionaire founder of Lincoln, he knows how to get things done. It's gonna tell you very effective. We know that connected effective. Very smart? I love you now smart rid off matters, but what or whatever you think is the smartest person you know is in that category. Somebody says his is ethnicity. No, that's not what we're going for. That's not what we're going for here's! What I know about red, often. he understands. Persuasion

a lot of what you see in the Stickeen us of social media was invented by Red Hoffman. I forget what process it was specifically by think he was behind the idea that that made things network sticky here that the recommending your friends, I think he was behind. the technology that seems obvious now right, isn't this the most obvious thing if you using an application, is says here: why don't you invite your friends? I think he invented that, and I would

offer that he probably knows more about psychology and persuasion than any of the billion years. Not positive about that. You learn. Mosque is up there to eleven. Musk was on the paper mafia, with we often so by the way, Red Hoffman and he alone musk their first start up well, one of their the first successful start up. I guess the big one pay pal was together. Red Hoffman isn't like other people, he has a deeper understanding of about twelve I've met him and talk with him briefly, so, silently of tiny amount of interaction with them. Personally,

but even in a tiny interaction. You talked him for five minutes and you know you're not talking to irregular person you're talking to someone who's operating that are really high level sort of Peter TIA level Peter Deal also from the paper mafia. So we're talking about people were extra extra smart. And his is fairly anti. Drug problem is extra smart, but he's smart in a persuasion brainwashing turned away the difference. Turn persuasion, brainwashing courses. Just your intention is your intention is positive. Those just called school and if your attention is about is called brainwashing, so we don't notice. Intentions are, but he is anti tromp, so one would have to we'll make it assumption which we can't verify but making assumption that it's sort of a tool to work against Trump ISM. So to speak.

And he would be one of the best brain washers of all time. It worried this would be the The first time I've seen somebody who would have my kind of skill for persuasion on the other team totally totally powered up, because I think he was really as active before it looks. It looks I use active, but he's taken it to another level. He is a master, persuade her. He has Trump life skills by E. He puts them to use behind the curtain instead of fraud. The current jobs, a in front of the curtain, persuade her people like tea musk and an Hoffman or behind the scenes, persuaded some some in front but mostly be I'd. I were I'm really afraid of this one. Honestly, I'm eight of how powerful this could become, just because the people involved.

here's, a bottom better model for food. Yet, what's true of new put that out there internet dad's internet dance like me, so this is none name. I came up with myself. Young people have been calling me in some other people on the independence the independent political voices have been calling us the internet dad's, because we sort of act like a baltic area. Don't worry, I got this dad I'll, take care of it, and I feel as if, if we dad's team up with say it, informal group of fact checkers, it's really powerful under nazi- have watched the model that I've been sort of eighty testing here, for which is that whenever I cease sketchy claim, which you see every day unto her I'll, take the sketchy claim and also

virtue, my two most productive, smartest ATLAS, who, look it pretty much any claim and tell you where the bee asses they can spot it bring quickly. So one is Andreas Back house in one is Anatole Anatoly Lebowski and their their responses are just insanely productive right. I don't know if it's all right, like you, I'm not claiming. There's anybody because everything I'm just saying that when they way- and you just see a differently the moment their way in and like others. This study is crap peers reason. Here's where they get the data is already been debunked, that sort of thing now, where a little weak I realized today is the legal stuff. But I do also have a whole bunch of lawyers who follow me on Twitter, etc.

So, although I haven't formerly activated that kind of a network I could, I could just ask the legal question. You know I think you're you're Robber, Barnes is etc would way in an answer. so the internet dad's have these informal, just as they have a big enough. Clever there, this informal group of fact checkers right. Who can you just come in, say that's you're, not you- and I also you may have noticed- have quite a few doctors who follow me now. The doctors follow me for an interesting reason, which is some number of doctors have figured out that they missed them. Miss some lessons in medical school. persuasion for one communication for another and maybe even some some nationally in terms of comparing the right things and statistics etc,

so I get a lot of doctors or just run to add a little too there tell unskilled it's that directly related to what they do so at this If you send me a yell, a rumour acclaim fairly easily on twitter? Just put it open to comments, you read the comments. A really gonna know more about not can claim. We can always get the right answer. I'm just gonna claim that if you look at my twitter questions and then the answers given is way better than any other source of understanding the world than I've seen element, let me make that IRAN coalmines, another attorney there there about their a bunch of him who retweet my stuff fill it often. So I know I have a legal advice of medical and I've got economics and data analysis.

So any of those fields. While not while not an expert myself I can. I can find somebody will give you a pretty good answer. Don't you think that's a better model, then whatever this is gonna, be the red offline thing. Now I would also say that, though, those people that you call your internet dad's, they might leave certain way, but were not we're not where Denny Philosophy Agus well maybe we'll went, philosophies, personal philosophies, but we're not went any party Name, anybody, you think is you'd call it internet dad whatever the definition of that isn't, whoever you pack and ask yourself if there were a slave to a party answers, usually not somebody's mentioning Michael Shell hamburger. Now

is a great example. So I've been interacting with an tweeting following Michael Kellenberger, stuff red is read books I dont know. Why is political biases think about that I've had extensive contact with him. I couldn't tell you what is biases. I know used to lean laughed, but he found now he'd been lied to unload the green technology stuff, so he's got little turned off by that. No idea, I don't know we will vote for nothing I interviewed up. Your lumber also takes a business approach to stuff now he's from another country, but I talked to him for a long time and I can't tell you if he leans, left or right, not a clue, nothing. I just don't know yet TIM Pool

who does evolve for, but I have a feeling he involve for whoever made sense. I lay I'll think he's went any party about MIKE sort of which my universal example for every every example use. Do you think he could vote for? Somebody wasn't in the particular party yeah easily easily he go wherever it makes sense and news Do it all the time so look for people who you're not entirely sure whether political is and also have good advisers that they can you Maybe this is a better model. Maybe is often true that things get invented by the public accidently says anti trump. Absolutely untrue! Absolutely into is not anti tromp me that that's the most simplistic reading of it all his anti some things.

The job is done. You could certainly be anti some things that job is done and he might even think that he is not the Europe first choice to be pro. I don't know where servage stands on any that, but as soon as you say, somebody's anti Trump, that's, not the person I am talking about. Because of your aunt. I a person you're, not really deep into the thinking. Part of things. So let me not cause some trouble here are some things we know it's cuz the whiteboard. And yes, this is gonna, be vague travel abroad because by the end of the day, if I've done right. Some things we know if you want Do the sources I've tweeted some resources this morning to use among my twitter feed

but here is some things when others, this correlation between IQ in Health- and we know that smart people tend to make small lifestyle choices. For example, the hire you I q and education, the less likely you smoke cigarettes because you are you using information and data and make decisions so just making right choices and up not doing dumb ass things gives you healthier outcome now, of course, isn't it we're not talking about every small person we're just like that the average Smart people tend to be richer and that allows them to live in lower crime neighbourhoods and associate with fewer fewer bad influences, and maybe better healthcare, and maybe even if the rich, they can get a prettier were more handsome made, which is a signal for health. The more attractive people are, on average.

the healthier they are. So you could see Lhasa mechanisms were smart people would end up healthier. There is also the notion that intelligence is probably a general indicator of health, because, if you're nervous system support, I intelligence or your nerve, your neural network, I guess apparently, if you have a fast neural network, you're smart, but is also a good indicator of health in general. So there's all this correlation. Now now here's usually get stuff, what is your knowledge about? Whether people were more of actually more educated people, vaccinated or uneducated. As a percentage do you know in the comments.

who is the most vaccinated category? The highly educated or the less educated. No, no don't know the answer is the educated, so at the moment, the way this changed over time. So I think early in the pandemic. When, when the vaccinations were brand new, there wasn't a lot of difference between the educated and the other. The less educated. in terms of whether they wanted it there's nobody has any information, but the I reject any people had been watching. Early year, whatever span and they say. Ok, we have more information now and were persuaded by that more information. So the educated people are far more likely to get vaccinated. Now it could be also access information. Other things are happening with poverty, so as not just because people are so

more educated right, so me says phds or lower. I question that I, just as this ago by the says, Phds have a lower rate of vaccination. I will make you a pretty big bet. That's not true. I have seen that I've seen that data by the way, but only through I'd, make a really big battle against that when they may take that back, but he won't take the back. This is without research is just an assumption. I don't think you wanna take take about a way. There was a new study they found out, and scientific America found out that people who got vaccinated with a cold

vaccination and by the way, don't assume that this is leading towards trying to get you vaccinated. That's not where this guy, I'm just short, causing trouble here s my only objective by but by trouble I mean a fun fun little mental exercise That's the trouble and talk about southern study. The showed that people who got vaccinated had better health outcomes. In general, even unrelated to covet they had few of all kinds of health problems. Explain explaining how do you explain the fact that people get vaccinated Had lower health problems in general is a bit

the implication was then. Maybe the vaccination solves unrelated problems? Well, it wasn't because the vaccination solved a bunch of unrelated problems, probably not it's probably because the higher iq, educated people vaccinated, higher rates and they're, just healthier and general now side? America did a funny thing. Launder the news that high IQ people are having better outcomes, cause you don't really one tell a story about high IQ people doing things in society better than low IQ people lie Why do you never want to write a scientific story

does high IQ people are doing better than low IQ people in any context, whether is health or economics or anything else. What? Why can't you do that, because it immediately turns into a racial discussion right turns into eugenics and all kinds of stuff. so scientific America. Found a clever way to deal with that problem. So they wrote an article which they had talk about IQ, having an outcome that was different for high iq locate low at you, but they needed to make it go away. Also so did this little track. Wisdom was clever things. They you'll see the publication. They said they laundered the correlation that they entered the article. They said, wait, yes, hi. I q is.

Who's related to go down comes, but we also tested reaction time and once we tested reaction time, the IQ correlation just disappeared. Cuz the people with good reaction times were the ones who had the best comes and myself I'm comes in general and so is really about reaction time. It's not about IQ at all. What do you suppose is related to reaction time. why? Why would be something you kind of expect when we somewhat correlated with reaction time like like a quick reflex, intelligence, Navy, general health, maybe or generally healthy. Who are. So generally intelligence, We are better reaction times where new expect that to be true. So here's what scientific American didn't they they found a.

a random, really random. I think Random correlation with good health, and then they tried to confuse these loudness thoughtfully. I Q S reaction time, so you stop talking about. I q welcome our clock on you, racist, this reaction time they just laundered the iq. They just took the correlation and tried to confuse you, buy throwing the specious other correlation. Almost certainly has you know, correlated, but there's some causation before that so here is a better way to do it better new approaches to focus on individuals instead of groups? Does it help you that much to know that Albanians have lower iq them left handed

bunions are lower iq than right handed Albanians? What are you going to do with that that what you going to do with it? How would you act differently if you knew it? if you would act differently, maybe a racist, because state the smarter way to approach it is just to say why are we looking at averages like? Did you ever hire an average person? There's no such thing as an each person, the real world we hire actual people, an actual people, are all over the place. There's no such thing as an average actual person said by weird coincidence. So if we just. Stop making a racist assumption. We have to worry about where it comes out The racist assumption is that look. He headed by race is useful. It's not

So useful, I would have liked what would you do differently? Nothin. so look out for all these are weird correlations and are really not causation. A rock investment company probably is invested in China or in some a peace. I saw on Youtube and utterly you know who is behind the video, but it was more than empty. Blackrock Blackrock is enormous. Would you call them hedge fund investment entity? What you go, but there are enormous and investing in China, and somebody is making the pay for it by colleagues. Now I think you get to see more of this. I think it will get increasingly hard for big entities. Laughter respond to shareholders, especially

Do business with China, so the Cairo Rittenhouse situation is happen. And I don't see, any chance that he is going a convicted. Do. Let me ask you I would say, if you put me on the jury further Rittenhouse thing, there's no way that he's getting convicted. If you put me on the jury cause, I would be the one person well down, even if the rest of the World, Conviction, don't you think, there's a hundred percent chance that the defence attorney can get one of me on a jury I'm an absolute Islam is amicably absolutist. I don't want to earn a nuance. Raven I saw him getting attack and I watched him shoot and there doesn't seem to be any question about the video being accurate in this case. If there are some questions about the video being accurate, but that there has never been a lead,

it looks like everybody says what we saw. What happened in that case, I don't see any case I lousy anyway. He could possibly get convicted Just as it is impossible so what's gonna happen, then there will be arriving in people get shot that need to be shot so All the anti gun people will do exactly what they don't want to happen, which is crazy situations where people will get shot. They Kyle renounce, gets but this was scarce imbalance to the story. I can't be a good internet Dan. Unless you know I can give some balance the story. I also would oppose. Knowing what we know now, but it could change Alec Baldwin going to jail work. We are having legal problems for what you did

may be clear from a gun ownership perspective he's a hundred percent responsible, not ninety, nine point, nine, not ninety, eight, nine point: nine hundred percent- that's just the standard! We can we kept me. We can be flexible with outright organ donors. I think, runs Skippy Flexible, but that the person with in their hand, is responsible. But this a legal standard. That's a gun owner absolute and these to stay. That way. But from a legal perspective, he did reasonable things that reasonable people can do not reasonable for Gunnar but reasonable for a citizen, and I think that, though, I think that the court's probably should leaned toward the reasonable citizens standard and not the.

Gunnar Standard, because anything the gun on a standard is it's not designed for a court purposes is designed to create a behavior. That's an absolute behaviour about safety is not really quaint compatible with legal standards. opinion, so I dont think that Ellie Baldwin should be should be faulted for the actual act of pointing in the gun and pulling the jailer bad judgment. Yes, bad judgment, yes from a gun owner perspective, very bad judgment, but not be a legal standard, I don't think because he did have process in place to make that safe. He thought now as a producer who hire the crew. Does he have.

some responsibility there I'd say yes and it looks like it's going to be his some somebody's insurance companies, probably going to pay a lot of money. I guess I assume there's some insurance that covers this either their production or his own, so Well, see manslaughter would require a reckless act and I don't think there's evidence of a reckless act, except by the gun owner standard, which is way way. Tighter than legal standards should be so from Can I get everybody deal with the new wants, the nuances that I grew he's a hundred percent responsible from a gun owners perspective and has to be that way, but at the same time, from a legal perspective, scholar be a little bit more common sense. If that's the way, you'd want to be judged, I think so that's why I've been neither Rittenhouse nor or Baldwin, should go to jail for anything that it we got. An update on the somebody told me

pronounced in the name of this place wrong, Lauer down Luton, Newton, county lowdown. Nobody give me the pronunciation, but it was the story about the air. The boy worth actually the non binary student. I guess gender fluid student who wore skirt, allegedly and attacked a girl in a restroom in school girls, restroom and had been accused, credibly of prior now I said when I heard the story really really, Everybody is concerned about some boy Putting on a skirt as an excuse to let go into the ladys restaurant and root rest Roman,

If somebody as really that happened exactly the way people were worried about it. Well, and I said what did I predict what I print it is, I don't think there's a skirt involves, I think, there's probably an assault. A definite, never doubted the assault. Why wasn't so sure about the skirt problem? The current reporting is skirt, confirmed, skirt confirmed. Andrew says it all caps Andrew Limit Linux means something to Andrew Richardson. I'm telling you I was wrong. You shouting at all caps doesn't make me more wrong. Burn, does make you an asshole. So if you want to just stick with you being cool compared to be being wrong in and then amending and in public keep keep your higher status

The moment you yelled at me and Capps you're you're sure of worse than me, the whole point is you're supposed to be celebrating your victory. You're intellectual victory over me. Don't ruin it with all caps. That's like surrendering Enjoy your victory come on now do you remember what happened when I said come Harrison would get the nomination for the Dems and she didn't and she dropped out to remember what I did I double down. I said I still think she's going to be. The The damn nominee, I can say that she has yet so, unlike who say that there is an accurate college close to accurate, pretty closes.

Do you remember when the vaguest shooter, all the smart people set its isis? I said it's definitely not ices and then ISIS claimed responsibility to remember what I did. I says not ISIS. I was right. So here's another another one where I have been confirmed to IRAN, that students was wearing the skirt and was in the least restroom I'm gonna double down. It say that this story is going to fall apart, in an important way, here's the way that I think it will fall apart. I think the skirt may or may not be true I am willing to accept that there was a skirt involved, but I don't think that anything to do with the rape. So I don't think tonight. Anybody is going to connect that to which was more to the point that that

connecting the two was, the problem, the idea that somebody wore a skirt, maybe with a purpose of you, know getting into a situation where they could do some raping. I don't think we're going to find out that it was ever a master scheme to get at the the girls in the girls restroom. I feel like we're going to find out there's a disturbed person, who's disturbed in a number of ways, and that's it. I think it's just going to be a disturbed person, Reilly of ways and and something bad happened, but I feel as though yeah. I feel as though the skirt is irrelevant to the story and that's what I'm going to stick with so I'll accept complete wrongness about the existence of a skirt anybody like to yell at me in all caps. This would be the time.

I shall give you an exemption I'll give you a sixty second exemption, in which you may in fact you're encouraged to gloat. Am I wrong this in all caps? Enjoy yourself? Please please enjoy yourself. Skirt lives matter wrong. Alan caps well done. Thank you freedom. I like lamp. Ok, Man I saw were good and that whom Aberdeen those coming out with a book and apparently one of their blockbuster things were learning in this book. Is that she wants, was invited by a senator. This is quite a while ago years ago, divided by a senator that she'd been in some meeting with to come up to his place for some coffee.

she was a single woman. Like sounds like the senator were single not mentioned, but listless say he was Why should we don't know anything about the senator status, but she would these senators place to have coffee. Rolled up his sleeves took off his blazer major, some coffee. Then the senator sat down on the couch put his hands around her shoulder and leaned into kisser was produced a kind of. Grass of about it and she said no. No, no sorry, oh my ear for that, at which point the senator did what he apology. It was like what I read the signals wrong. I'm very sorry. And then she said and she regrets it though she apologized to him, because he was twenty four. I guess issues like ok here in retrospect, I should not have apologised to him who was

he did something. What is your take on that story? Those of you who might be female watching this now, let me Can I say something with one swear word can: can you send people away for just one, just one? Anybody I need. I need permission. Can somebody give me permission for one well placed f. Word anybody! Okay, I got one. Hello pushed back here, somebody does want it gave at the local people say: yes, I think we're gonna have to do it. Let me go. Some advice for the Ladys Ladys. If a man invite you to his places, just the two of you for a beverage be a coffee,

Be it alcohol, be it a very delicious vegetarian kind of the beverage. Whatever their beverages, if a man, especially in attractive single woman to his private place for that beverage. He has asked you if you'd like to fuck. And you said yes, probably not. Yes, definitely. But what do you say? Yes, I would like to go to your private place to have this beverage. You have offered you female Leslie to this have told that man, I would absolutely be interested and fuck you pretty much tonight. now, if you did not mean to send the message here is why I'm inform you, If you send the message, I pretty much em up to fuck

and the guidelines into cash you he may the operating on bad information. our system doesn't put him make him you off the hook, The man is still required to respond to the signals as soon as they are clarified right. We all agreed that, yes, if it's a hotel room, is pretty much guaranteed. So I guess this is a cautionary tale I suppose there could be such a thing as a twenty four year old who can. in the meeting with the senator and is still too dumb to know what an invitation to come up to his place really means. And the secretary of the sad hopes, I read the signals wrong now the senator didn't read the signals wrong, the senator read the signals exactly as they were sent there were the wrong signals. I think it was rather generous

very generous for the senator to say he read the singles wrong. You read anything wrong. Signals were crystal clear. There were several, so you read or write. It was a central, that's my open, but I'll think getting bigger, which is good, Alright, whose another word about that already, I think gotta, go and do something else. This, probably what my best yo, but I think you're relaxed you just the same. I can feel you're. Eighty body is getting stronger even now. Yes, and apparently she only remembered her traumatic experience recently about come up. Place to listen to records. All means the same thing yoga yours

some data on their phd thing, people. the masters we had the least hesitancy and the highest hesitancy was among those holding a Phd hesitancy. hasn't and c is fine, but I am only going to doubt that the rate of vaccination is lower than other people. No, I don't think they phd rate of vaccination would necessarily be higher than the masters degrees, but I guarantee that Phd vaccination rate is higher than non college. Educated people enable everyone has offered I'll talk to you later.