A pom pom good morning, everybody and welcome to yeah? You know, you know what I'm going to say and it's true every time it's the best thing. That's ever happened to you right now. It's called coffee with Scott Adams, the livestream that defines Quality and all the other life streams, the only live stream, where the odds of me blowing my nose in front over the audience, always a good thirty, seven percent likelihood, so that kind of professionalism I bring to this and it causes everybody else by catch up. I know how would you like to have the simultaneous anybody. Anybody, let's have a simultaneous happened sleeve first time this morning, I'll be doing us up with anybody. Yeah. So this will be the first one of the day.

Anna Scott, the simultaneous upper nowadays a cover among her uncle S. Take her gel static, anti drug have lasted a vessel over the guide, fill it with a favorite liquid. Like coffee, Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the government of the day. The thing makes everything better watch. What does your antibodies, which his watch this go on? hold on hold on most of my antibodies. Just came online. Some of them did not we're. Gonna need to do a second augmented sip here. Go checking raw line, nor was some kind of a vaccination mandate account or something but my antibodies- we're not going online. At the same time, good Zagreb, organ.

Well over this killing twelve hundred people per day Helen United States, allegedly if we're accounting them correctly and the hours or back. That's the news. apparently we have some kind of a plateau. Things were drop and like crazy, and then we apply plateau that plateau is probably say some experts To do is not seasonality exactly but indoor living. now here's here's a new clue for this pandemic and I don't Now that I exactly process this before something I've heard of, but had quite put it together, it goes like this you're normal. flew as seasonality right. The summer comes the flu. Pretty much guess knocked out if it's the seasonal flu, but the grown a virus and the Delta have seem to have a different battered, which is that

A respond to indoor living regardless of the season, Apparently it's not enough to simply be outdoors in the summer and indoors in the winter. If its Florida in the summer, people go indoors and legal covered. And in other places in the winter they go indoors covered. But why doesn't that work with the regular flu. Why does the regular flu which, presumably is also worse indoors right. Does anybody doubt that nobody doubts that the regular flu is also worth indoors the? What is a regular flu still still still succumb to seasonality when this one doesn't? Is it just more aggressive? Is that all it is? Is it is just a man

degree right so summer saying it's the aerosol verses contact on services? I guess would be the other way size has not weapon ice like you're thinking the gain a function. What does that? But let's do a little laugh little critical thinking. Is there anything we can learn from the fact that their that the regular flew succumbs to seasonality, and this one does it aside from the fact that more aggressive, maybe that's all story, is just more aggressive, Where's a question I'm just gonna put that were put out. This is a thought, experiment and not something that anybody will ever do so

what, as we had a rule, the said that, if more than just pick a number, if more than three people are gonna, be in a room for more than ten minutes and again, I'm just making this up for four conversation purposes. You have to open a window, even if it's winter, you have to open a window other. Describing three people in a small room together? Could you get rid of the corona virus in two weeks? I got a feeling if we could study how many times people got an infection in a room that a window open. What do you think I feel as if opening a window takes here. getting the corona virus from pretty good too. Maybe hardly ever. Do you think. I don't know, there's a study that, but if you could study

is indoors with the window open, protect you completely, just just like being outdoors being outdoors, seems to protect you almost completely And remember my other hypothesis that fans might be enough to keep you safe indoors. What if you said you, you can't have a gathering of more than three people unless the Phantom zone turn a phantom and the fan would just be to disperse whatever is in the air so that, even if you were infected it be so The small load, as opposed to a big plume, you don't want to stand and plume of covert, I thought, if you were in a room where there was just like trace, amounts floating around you. Probably fine I'll bet you. So it is here's a bet, that's easy that, because we'll never do it we'll never find out. I'll make a bet that if you had a rule and people followed it, of course they wouldn't, but if you could

The EU should therefore the three people in the room for more than ten minutes. Without a fan on, or at least say ceiling Van Ryan Kind of a fan or window opened, suddenly I'll bet it within the pandemic. Whenever Isla must decide to sell us five billion worth of his stock. Some say it's me: does he needed some cash to pay some some tax liabilities from some stock options he exercised or something I don't the details, but it seems related to please stop what Steve? What are you telling me to? Please stop the topic, because I'm gonna Papa you off the chandelier.

Like that, can become very ill. I must sold some years. The best part of the story, Isla must doesn't do anything boring. I dont know how he does it, but he can't you somehow genetically designed where you just can't new boring I don't I don't know if you lose out, and so steady, just selling some stark and paying used axes like some quiet billionaire. Might he does a twitter pole and then tells people there he'll follow whatever the twitter pulse ass now. The funny thing is that there's nothing less scientific than a twitter ball, I've been really that's just ridiculous. So here's a guy who's going to make multibillion d. decisions. Decisions based on twitter poll that is just the best- that's just the best- is impossible for him to be born, He somehow we made the most boring thing: I'm gonna pay my taxes into

citing because it turned into a terrible that wasn't scientific. So the ball said he should sell some stock. I use talk about ten percent of holdings, but is old, five billion worth And it looks like he actually is doing what the tourist pulsar intestinal stock is up today, some voices anyway there's not much meat to their stories. You stay everything He doesn't interesting to so some news, fake news on Fox NEWS. How many of you think think Fox NEWS News sometimes has some faint news and I that that mostly mostly may follow CNN and MSNBC. your summer, fake news. Now, of course, I'm using my definition of fake news. Okay. So this is my personal definition of fake news, and that includes this tell If somebody gives you the news with a percentage

This was a x percentage of something, but they don't give you. The raw numbers is fake news and also the reverse. If they give you a raw numbers for a story, but the percentages would tell you more is vagueness. So any time you see a story that only the wrong numbers, or only the percentages is intended as manipulation. So you're, so the fake news, I'm fine. It is by Pilar or pillar Pilar areas. So this is not not an opinion. Peace is a newspaper on the Fox new site. And it talks about one California. School board is rejecting the mandates for kids to give action is and as part of the context of the story,

The data is shown that twenty four percent of covert cases were kids, that news or fake news, twenty four percent of covert cases. Lately I've been kids news or failures. let's say is true, so I'm not saying something true, but is it news or fake news? Fake news is famous cuz. The context is clearly intentionally omitted. What would be the context? Zero deaths right. The context would be and zero deaths those properly that zero. It might be one or two whatever it is, but the number of DAS is pretty important store is, because otherwise, your vaccinating, the kids to save other people is an ethical to vaccinate kids to save other people

Suppose it will depend on how many other people were arrested if it was all of them, maybe ass, if like every adult, would die unless kids were vaccinated. Well, yeah, I guess maybe in that case you would vaccinating, because kids would need living adults to take care of right. But this is clearly just fake news, because the context is clearly intentionally left out. How many of you would like to see my calmly Harris impression anybody anybody? because she's in the news he was ever see our team meeting and apparently she was talking to the folks and Louis viral video of her talking now I give you my calmly Harris Impression I would like to show you how an actual a real person would talk in public.

Here's out a real person would talk, they might talk with their hands, for example, they might say this that are here. You see people talking like this like this like this, that that's our normal person talks? If Cobble Harris, you! U pattern your body language after the police officer from young Frankenstein ever see ever see the movie. If you see the movie, that's pretty funny So to do your calmly Harris Impression, we'll just things I get to stand up for this. Oh hell hell hell up technical difficulty over what the hell. I say again nobody's ever may they can stand for a monitor that isn't shitty number one. You need

an unstable wish, Blazer so I can use a man's jacket because well trust me: I'm gonna work! so you put on the unselfish calmly Harris Jacket, though he appears in public. She also wears a mask put the mask on and then because I don't have a wig, so I'm gonna cheat a little bit but taking off my glasses rigour, it gives you the top calmly Harris and now here's Cobble Harris talking, all add some dialogue of my own.

Because what she says is usually babbling nonsense, but what's the body language? So if you have the critical race theory, what you do is you ve gotta apply, the plan. Then you execute the plan and then you And then everything is fine, no matter what I'm saying I have I'm not nervous, I feel comfortable talking to public

suppressions will rights the? U S is always right. You are right that Erika Mann Competition is first. She said.

Also microphone. That's better right! Here's, my problem with comparing math performance across countries, if you're the best. Beth stood in China? Do you think, You have a choice about big mouth competition. What do you think you're? The best mass do in China does China say to you? Hey, do you wanna, be a math competition or does China say you're in a mass competition? take the United States, if you rate at math and you're seventeen or eighteen. in the United States, they say to you in others that international math competition. What are you The United States,

I might be interested, but I just launched a U record and start up and its skill go public in a week for ten billion dollars. So I miss the contest, here's the thing competition tells you anything because all you really finding out is that the people who are in the competition how they did not really tell you anything about the home country. I don't think, except that some might be courses. So don't trust there. I would love to see if there is any way to the top one per cent of mass students in each country and you see how they can there be. As it doesn't really matter if everybody else is good at math, because we don't use that much.

Sometimes I use a little algebra believe it or not- sometimes every now and then comes in heavy, but not often, and that if I had to have a work around, I probably could so anyway, we teach math to too many people who will never use it waste wasted time, insides aid, eighty percent of math education, the higher level education, in my opinion, is completely wasted. Time. but is certainly useful for the top and say ten percent of students. And certainly everybody should learn at least algebra, I think at least algebra, but maybe they can spend it. are you some faint news from CNN? Now this is an opinion peace by Michael D, Antonio, so the opinion pieces urge of standard right because the spinning, But it's on a new site and I don't think so.

And would allow an opinion on a new site there are new side unless the facts and alleged in the peace were also faxes, CNN, says or fax. Would you They even those in opinion base. The editors are going to put it on CNN page unless the factual claims are actually accurate. According to that So there's a factual claim by Michael D, Antonia on CNN under website he's a web of skip the part he talked. He talks about a well documented and objective truth of tribes.

defeat, so he says: there's a well documented and objective truth of his lecture defeat. Is that a fact that is well, documented and objectively to know its objective Lee true that no court has ruled that there was a substantial fraud not looking for something is the same as not not be there the course don't look for fraud, they only judge was brought to them. In most cases they didn't have the the standing or the jurisdiction even rule of it. so basically melt. No fraud was really look that any Syria. Way. The audits looked at the obvious stuff, but they can't wanted everything, including the electronic stuff. so yeah. That's just like this. Cnn readers would not know the difference.

I've told you many times that our opinions are assigned to us, but is hard to see it right, because you think your opinions come from some internal process. There are only a few situations which is really obvious that your opinions were assigned to you. I'm gonna give you one of those. Now I'm not talk about you necessarily right, so this doesn't mean you specifically, but the public has an opinion, a class, opinion both left and right right. This, this one won't even be much difference, left or right. This is in the signed opinion and when you hear it, you're gonna know a right away, but it was invisible until I mentioned to watch this. If Christopher Steel of the famous steel dossier had been an Ex russian,

by instead of an Ex british spy? Would we say that he was part of russian interference? If Christopher Steel had been an Ex russian spy, would we say that Putin was involved yet Yes, I understand why, wouldn't we say that if christian Thirsty, this hypothetical, he was operating independently and he was no longer working for an intelligence agency. Maybe you didn't even live in the country they live in Would you say, or that doesn't count cause he's independent allowed his axe he's, not least in our part of the intelligence he used but now he is so. Would you say: ok, that's a distinction that matters, so

We want to say that Britain's behind a cause he's not really working for important anymore, but he's a ex british spy and yet. Both the left and the right believes that an Ex british spy has no connection back to his home country and intelligence agencies. But you wouldn't believe that if he were an extra, spyware do here is why you would never be able to come up with this opinion on your own, this is how you know it's in assigned opinion. Nobody would come up with this opinion on their own. If you already was Ex M sexism, British intelligence, you would say to yourself quite reasonably: there's no such thing as Ex british intelligence right.

You would never say to yourself. There is such a thing as an ex spy, because there isn't There are definitely people were not on the payroll and there definitely people were not taking orders from their old bosses. That's true, but If he's about to do something that has international repercussions at the very highest level, he checked with his old boss I want to say that, with complete confidence I mean I don't know, I don't have facts to back it up right, but do you think there's any chance? He didn't check it with the home office first, even though he doesn't work there he's an ex spy doesn't owe them anything.

Oh thank! You checked with them. First really, because if he were russian you'd be sure he did you'd be sure he did, but because he's british, our press just ignore them and because it ignored you don't come to the conclusion that he was actively involved with great Britain. in trying to interfere with the elections. This is of the opinion that nobody would come to on their own, and yet both left and right came to this opinion that the Great Britain's not really involved in interfere. This it am I wrong that one I pointed out you can see that this is an assigned opinion. Nobody came to the spending on Rome now, some of you- and I

the covers some of you were there all alongside wait, a minute, there's no such thing as an ex spy. Exactly you know you, you can never be completely axed right. It is a good example. Is the this oral bother you a few things about it, because if you, if you would never once thought awaiting a great Britain, definitely interfered with election if you ve never had thus all once, then you you accepted and assigned opinion with uncritically see what else is going on. I love the fact that,

new revelations about low alone, my potential spammed, as won't talk to me I thought I was gonna be fun. So what's funny is that now that we know that there is still a dossier was released, remaining with the democratic campaign for Hillary Clinton. Now, though, we know that and clearly this is worse than the Watergate by a lot by but like a factor of order does not even close, Carl bursting the guy? The sea then trot out to say that everything that job did was worse than the Watergate. They can't bring about tv anymore.

The funniest thing about this is that he's gotta be completely shadow he's, probably in hiding Literally, you need, if they are about you, I'll bet you a that. No journalist can find him right now about whose literally off the grid somewhere not answering. Because there's no way he's not going to be asked us, this is worse than the Watergate. What the hell is, he gonna say: you're you're, starting to sound like birthday, a baby, alright Jeffrey Toobin of courses in the news that I've defended him getting his job back cuz. I think you just made a dumb mistake and that's not really the reason you should fire people it was just a funny mistake that, however, does not let him off the hook, because when you do something that funny, I'm gonna have some fun

so I totally support him getting his job back, I'm just gonna, say I'll. Just summarize what he said in his commentary. This is this is my summer some relation. So don't don't blame him for the wording, but Tuvan thinks that the Rittenhouse has a jerk, so part of his commentary is at Rittenhouse was really really dumb to bring a gun to where he did so. Two good things: Rittenhouse has a jerk, but also that Rittenhouse his lawyers might get the jerk off. Everything anybody I desire that Rasmussen Bowl that says fifty five percent of the public surveyed, I think, he's a likely voters, usually

oppose mandatory vaccinations for kids and thirty five percent in favour. Fifty five percent oppose mandatory vaccinations. What percentage of the country has to oppose anything before you can be sure it won't happen? What percentage I feel like it's about. Seventy five. stop fifty five, definitely not fifty five. Somebody saying seventy maybe depends on the topic probably, but I think he needs seven thousand and seventy five before before the public's of the control. Remember I remind you know I didn't steal that joke from Gutfeld But we do have a similar sense of humour, so I wouldn't be surprised if he, if you had a similar joke.

I think seven thousand and seventy seventy five percent is, is when the the public simply takes control at fifty five percent. I think we do throw it to the government say I we can't decide you do, and then we we live with it, because it is better to have a system that works than to get everything. You want every time so left. Fifty five percent gonna have to get so convince your fellow citizens. Don't convince the government. Does the government not to change its mind at fifty five percent? China is continues to be not safe, for business, Gregor fell just their taxes, be too to say the that wasn't his joke. He says, he's married and come up with it. So I guess

Craig is watching aggregate anyway, there's a new, Urban policy and Shenyang China- I learned about this in an even bremmer tweet by. you should follow in Bremmer. You would be one of the twenty people on Twitter. That say useful good things that you wish you wish you do so following an Brenner. for years, the new China covered policy our visitors are quarantine for twenty Days in the hotel, so you for twenty eight, is you: don't have any human contact up close

tested seven times during that and if all clear you have to go self quarantine, that home for another month, so so twenty eight days at a hotel quarantine, followed by a month, quarantine at home, quarantine at home. That's fifty six days of isolation. Fifty six days the visit, China not less very serious, but is also one more reason not to go to China in case. You need very so anyway, There is still doing business in China unless you have existing business centre, which I would understand. If you two were you think about, another time. Well, Michael malice! If you don't follow him, you shit he's another great follow on Twitter. Had this great tweet today said: Blue killed people use language as a way to avoid thought.

Cognitive processes entirely different. They use phrases delivered to them by the corporate press to close our thoughts that were that, where a critical bind would otherwise go I came to the sewing up a hole in clothes and I do believe that's pretty much there now. I call that word thinking where you use words of the sound right to replace any critical thinking, but yeah they do use language as a replacement for critical thought. That's actually true. Good good, good observation right, so psychological Rittenhouse, this this trials really interesting and now for good reasons. it's interesting and all the wrong way is for us Today there is a hashtag trembling. Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty. What cow Rittenhouse is guilty.

The entire trial isabel, having no evidence No evidence of any crime has been bent even presented, no evidence that looks like any evidence really. So there are people who could watch this and still think he's guilty of what bad judgment a sort of crime? So I would like to say this number one. This is something they should not have retreated to political sides. It shouldn't have, but of course everything does. However, I would like to propose this thought experiment. If Kyle Rittenhouse had then let's say identified as a typical leftist. who had also used again to kill somebody in what looked like self defence. Would the right stay, whose eyes and say always left us other guilty, or

the people on the right, the programme people say now. Doesn't matter who does it itself? Defence, because I think the right would have stuck were stuck with principle. wrong about that. Now I do that the left and the right are equally guilty of just deal going to their side, saying oh, my side is the side? Your side is outside and just ignoring the facts, otherwise it. What team are you on, but I feel like the right would not have, doomed on this one, because our sort, a team Gunnar. They think the right more team gun than they are teen Republican. Am I right and end the gun information about this? Just like the Elk Boldwood story, the guns stuff is absolute and they should be, and I've had this conversation with the least one person about the olive Baldwin thing

I think it a applies here. Gun mentality runs as an absolute because ass to be right, salt offences and absolute defence is not a partial defence is an absolute difference. Gun responsibility is absolute if the guns of your hand year. Irresponsible. care who you delegated to the fact that you We'll get their responsibility to Armourer is irrelevant if it's in your hand, rice a vastly that's the way, the gun people. Think of absolutes. That's that's my impression anyway and again this is just purely subjective, but I feel like the right would not have taken teams on this except team gun to just supports the absolute nature of some of these things

I asked a question that was just a thought experiment. Obviously this can't insured happen. But if somehow Kyle Rittenhouse got a gun on the witness stand and shot the prosecutor in the middle of the trial, would it be self defence? Would it be self defense? What's your first thought will not oh, can't shoot somebody during the trial and certainly if this prosecutor were normal prosecutor, making a case. With no lies and no exaggerations just making their case So no there's, no there's nothing going on here, except a fair trial of courses, and cereal process. You're not gonna like what the other team says, but that's not that's, not a reason for killing somebody system working just the way the system is supposed to work, but, as I was half of the year, I saw what I'm saying

What I'm saying is somebody murdering an innocent man in front of us? That's what I icy, because if you don't think that what is happening to pile Rittenhouse brain is not grievous harm. You don't know anything about anything. Cholera and house is suffering at the moment grievous physical harm. Now the physical part is the physical part of his brain but his brain is being permanently reprogrammed into a negative for the net into PTSD. Probably already has But what about what is happening now is the height of criminal behaviour. There's somebody in grievously harmed right in front of us without reason, without cause, because if he had evidence that Kyle Rittenhouse was a criminal. I say well, you gonna do what you gonna do, since the evidence clearly shows he's. Not the continued, torturing and dismay.

of this young man's brain right and flocking front of us looks like a crime to me, And while I don't know how I would rule, if I run the jewelry, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't care if you stood up and shot the prosecutor again, I'm not in favor of violence, but it was just a thought, experiment: experiment, nobody should shoot anybody violets again, but in terms of would it be justifiable? I think yes,. It would be very unwise and I wouldn't want to see any kind of trend like that, but would it be justifiable to shoot this specific prosecutor in this specific situation? And I say yes, I say yes, I think that why he's doing the prosecutor, Roy

is this to a level of grievous bodily harm, and that is its witness apple. We're watching it right now, right in front of us Jeanette says you're losing me here. What are members of thought experiment? So no, what is arguing Asian actually do it Joe Biden, I guess, during the campaign called Kyle Rittenhouse, a white supremacist which is backed by a zero Evans, their zero evidence or anything can Joe Biden be sued for calling him a white supremacist. I dont know the answer is probably not as a sitting president. but can we be sued after is out of office? I would say yes right to me that feels like a slammed out How in the world can you lose their case, does the evidence evidently said it is clear the evidence.

There was no evidence, for it is clear and he did it for a malicious purposes, which was when election by aligning some innocent. so, but also, I wonder if its unimpeachable. I ask him the same question again and see if he denied summit please ask Joe Biden if he He disavowed is prior comment about Kyle being white supremacist, because if he doesn't disavow it I think that's unimpeachable, Murat may not or not it meets these standards speed. ethically of Impeach Adobe, but if the President of the United States targets a citizen who is objectively and obviously innocent of the charges, I feel like some kind of crime is involved, is not a crime,

waste impenetrability. So somebody you ask about Peter Doozy get on that. all right. I still say that the crime of the century is one that nobody's calling crime except me. As far as I know, Is whatever happened with the rapid test strip approvals in this country? Now before I talk about rapid test trip, Google. My understanding is that a lot of people. I don't understand why rapid tests, which are somewhat less sensitive than the norm let us why we would have less sensitive, does at all in the end, because you get me a false, false rigs, and the answer is that they would catch pretty much all of these superstructures. If they were people didn't have symptoms. If you have symptoms, you go get a good test right. Everybody understands that. If you have covered symptoms, you don't use the rapid test. You immediately get the real

If you, if you have covered symptoms and you only use the rapid test, well, then you using the wrong tool. That would be bad, I'm sure people do it, but that would be the wrong tool and that would be bad otherwise the fact that only one company got approved quickly, I think it was abbot and there were, Other company is, you begin to get approved that could have done these things quickly, and they didn't makes me believe that the only explanation for that is massive corruption, which could have cost the lives of hundreds of thousands of Americans. So far. Now I don't know who it is or what or why This happened, but I do

I believe that in confidence is why we were delayed. Do how many of you think that the correct explanation of why were delayed so much and other countries warrant was incompetence. Remember the things that we didn't approve were were approved by other big. these are also smart. Why would that be? Can you think of any reason other than corruption, because I can't I can't think of any reason other than corruption, so mice. It is that there are some corruption, you're hiding in plain sight. That is just insane Bellamy Let me complicate the story a little bit as Adam Dopamine tweeted today, not his real name. As far as I know

that the FDA is gonna, let em November thirtieth to discuss approving therapeutics the pills I think, Pfizer handsome therapeutic pill. And right now I guess boroughs welcome as something and regeneration now you can get a shot of regeneration that acts as a therapeutic or actually a prophylactic answer, you're getting so so they give me the November thirtieth. What's your first reactions that they're gonna meet at an event birth areas to discuss it? What's your first reaction, they're gonna meet November Thirtys to discuss it here is my first reaction, its November eleven. We're in a pandemic. Who decided to wait all that time to talk about the most important thing that they need to talk about. Is there something more important than this one.

Are they doing those more important this Thanksgiving vacation family leave? This looks like corruption too, Because the faster you get therapeutics the faster the demand for vaccinations will we'll go down. Does a lot of people are gonna, go all Joe Rogan on this right. The Google Allah They're can say I don't need a vaccination, as is therapeutics. Look good, sir I would say that this delay might be scheduling, might be incompetence. But in the context of what seems to be more obvious, probably financially related crimes or corruption, this delay itself looks like corruption to me.

Doesn't look like corruption to you, because I don't really understand why you can't do this tomorrow. Deal is deserve, My understanding is that Pfizer as the data, if they're waiting for data them. Yes, of course, but the data is already out right, how long does it take a look at the data? I guess other people dig in an ethical questions and stuff, but I suppose that process might be happening between now and the thirtieth and just part of the process, but somehow it in the context of not trusting them in general? I'm not sure I would automatically give them the benefit of the doubt on this. Anyway, so this was going on and it just put this out there if Trump war president, do you think the FDA would wait till November

or would he be kicking there ass to do a faster if that's possible, again, we don't have enough information, so could be that the out bunch of FDA endless need to study it just takes so long in Bogota, but I have a little ever will doubt that it takes so long to study Does the only data they have is gonna come from Pfizer right as has been all over it shouldn t that longed for somebody, you least understands how to look at the numbers to know. If this looks legit or not. Ok, so I think Trump would have made their better and if it is not, we can imagine that he would have as us. This provocative question. If trumps election strategy, we don't know for sure he's running, but I

Yes, it is if his election strategies is just to state chill for oil and away for the public, to beg him to come back its working. If strummed, if trump strategy is just stay, chill, don't don't make a new provocation. The OECD responds to everything in the news provocatively, but that's ok cause that's just in the news, but don't come up with something is brand new How come up with something this brand new and and be provocative about? All you have to do is hang out because the the Democrats are doing such a bad job. People are going to beg for him to come back just to fire people, just the fire people. Because, at least we know, Trump is good at that our was asked Kennedy recently why you didn't fire fashion.

and his answer some people question, because his answer was the faulty part of his answer? Wasn't the whole. But part of the answer. Is that how she had been around a long long time is that don't answer to. Why didn't you fire? When you think that answer that around a long long time. So. But you know that's not a good answer, but but then there is a mystery right. You know tromp has no problems firing people in general. I think we would all agree that he can fire people. The lights or there's one thing is critics will agree with the? U can fire people is a fire, so do you think he just couldn't fire of algae? I think he gave us a hint and here's the hint found she has

such a high credibility, partly because he ve been around along the firing him would have made Trump look like the guy who doesn't believe in science and believes and hydroxyl clarity and drinking bleach according to his so I believe that tromp was actually in a corner. I think that he correctly read the room, which is what he does well by the way. Trump will never get the credit you deserves for how well he reads room the other room being the country. In this case he can read a room and I'm not sure everybody else. just as their skill, he can read the room in a small room and he can resume the country. I think he read the room and he said I fire the guy that sixty percent of the country thinks is the smartest guided. The game will lose credibility and I don't think it was a bad thing that he had a good cop, bad cop situation going on. I don't know that

I hated that did you weren't, when, when you see the little LE divisions, maybe between forty and Trump, at least in terms of how they messaged and stuff like that, I felt that, the productive tension. I wanted to see that want to see a play out, so I think that his instinct to not fire found she was actually well thought out. It's hard to know. Maybe it wouldn't work them better. If he had, we can never know, future, but I feel, like I feel like my instinct, would have gone in the same way. I feel like you needed to keep him round even even to keep around as bunching back, which is what so even keeping around as a scapegoat right was probably good play. Probably a good play. so, and I think that trumpet hinted at that by giving

the answer non answer, which is he's been around a long time, that the sort of a indirect way to say yes LE credibility, so firing him would be, would be obviously some blow back, So by those failure for now firing him, you know I have a different opinion about Sochi and the experts than most we do and part of it is that. being wrong sort of built into their job right what we ask is experts to give us a coffin in opinion about stuff in this situation this never happened before. In other words, this the specific and the pandemic has never happened before

so everything they felt she said was true or probably true, were protection if it gets us stuff wrong. I think that's just the situation. I think that's the situation more than me than forty. I think I think he's in a situation where being wrong is just sort of built them in and you too so. Mrs Scott loves the pandemic, so I saw us got got leave say that he thought the pandemic would be essentially over in January. When do you think. I think the pandemic will be not over about. It will be taken out a pandemic and into endemic territory. Just we gotta live with it in January. That seem too soon to. I feel, like that's optimistic,

depends on the therapy Unix. If, if in June we can take a pill that reduces are now odds of something by eighty percent or something, and I think we're endemic at that point. While those who use a covert is over keep him keep in mind that the the e are capacity and largely because of covert not totally so there's still a medical capacity issue with covered this very real. Looked to Germany. Now I'm not and looked look to Germany. As I often say, leadership will not be the thing that was the most productive here

How to deal with a family member who is incredibly afraid and has cognitive dissonance uncovered yeah? No, I suppose just giving context could help a little bit, but fears fear is the best persuade ourselves. Somebody is afraid it's hard to change their mind. You can't make people less afraid unless you're really really work on for a long time and they want to be they'd have to want to be less afraid, and I don't know if they want to be. Your hospitals are supposed to be near capacity. You write this might be a little bit of fake news because they talked about one hospital was at eighty five. Eighty, eighty five percent capacity, which my understanding is that's exactly where you want to be less. My understanding, staffing defies define skipper

well largely, but not only there. There definitely is some space limitation and equipment limitations their business model is, they require full hospitals to make money, so So as a little and clearest and much of this was faintness sophistry, you just took both sides. What did I take? Both sides of now is now sophistry when you, you take Belsize showing that there is an argument of all sizes that sophistry. I think that's a good ad. That's my tell for and pieces. have you noticed there just some things that people always say like? Oh that's sophistry, I think that's just NBC thing.

Yeah references to the matrix references to soil agreed references to sophistry here. I think those are all just somebody doesn't have critical thinking, maybe an npc and not yet one thousand nine hundred and eighty four right, one thousand nine hundred and eighty four is another one of those. If that's where you're at you're, probably not part of the list, thinking class. Rubber says which FDA Employ worked for but labs? No, that's not the right question. That's almost the right question robber! The real question will be who, at the FDA, was specifically in charge of deciding which, which rapid tests

our values, and so I would go a little deeper and find out who specifically was in charge was set at the simulation. I don't think so. Nation falls into the empty seats category it because that still sort of new- and you dig did anybody see, was Eric one state who went to a group of economists in Chicago and told them economics, which had always been wrong deserted. The bathroom

I am I'm over summarizing. Let us not exactly what was happening, but did anybody see the outcome of that? How do you have to go? Was there any kind of her resolution Eric or bread? Wasn't Eric? I was Eric Wright, I think, like Chicago some Economics group. There are alright hours close, so we don't know what happened all I'll be interesting. I love to hear that because.

I definitely would not be surprised if economics have been using the wrong math forever. There would surprise me at all, but I think it would be very surprised if he convinced the economist butter there's an antibiotic shortage. You know your. Let me give you the atoms law of slow moving disasters and I'm not, Short entirely applies to these supply chain problem by figures,

now. The supply chain is what sort of his kind of quickly right. So I don't think anybody quite saw coming, but I would predict that what we thought was an impossible situation that there was so much congestion in the ports. They you couldn't even clear out the congestion it was so congested. The literally nothing could happen like you couldn't even move a cream mover you'll like basically nothing that has just dissolve just filled with storage containers and nothing could move now. That's the sort of the exaggerated, hyperbolic version of it, but if you bet on people- and I always do if you bet on people- somebody's figuring it now- meaning that there is

some people or persons at the ports who are saying you now nobody have this idea before. But what, if we do, this listen, but this together I'll betcha that oh, what looks like an unsolvable problem is being solved. While we talk I'll betcha that smart people are finding, maybe they're a be testing, maybe they're just poking around. Maybe they ve got in a box solution, Maybe they've changed the system, your cleverly something, but I would be surprised if humans, with all of our ingenuity, given the size of the problem and the steaks I'll, be surprised if we don't fix this faster than any kind of

sense would tell you could be fixed by common sense, as this could be a long problem. My optimism is that there will be enough smart humans trying enough stuff. The somebody's gonna find out what works and unjust do more of it. I think so so as keep an eye on it. This I got for now and I'm good go to some other stuff. There is no is today or tomorrow. Veterans day is its day today or tomorrow. So I guess tomorrow is a day off for school anyway. So to the veterans. Thank you for your service, Only veterans are today and in the comments veterans make yourself now

oh, you veterans, go while love only count. Look at all the veterans, user, lotta veterans, Holy cow: do I have like every veteran in the world watches or just a lot of veterans- and I don't useless at you see the comments on both platforms? I can see them both. He can only see the one IRAN, but both platforms or just screaming, with veterans amazing Our aid spouses, spouses veterans to thank you for your service. Do,

if you're a spouse or family number. Thanks for your service. Guess it's it's a group effort. We know that very that every audience very, very art, ass, often our respective veterans- and we will talk to you.