Good morning, everybody by them Do you know I always open a drawer and take outline my notes before I do the simultaneous it is not because just because I don't remember it, that's part of it, but it's also a thing for me, go by and the locals platform by the way locals has in their comments. You can embed beams and pictures. So the locals comments. Dream is frickin hilarious compared to the the Youtube stream, which is justified, But when you look at the locals, the locals free, it is hard not to laugh. So the reason, the reason that I always do this sometimes Youtube click clips off this part.

But let me tell you I do so listen to it again. Sitting here is based, introduction. So it is also a trigger were a key, as we say in hypnosis if he heard every time you should, if you like the content from prior shows, It should put you immediately in the head space, so it's sort of a trick to put you in the right frame of mind by repetition. Same is really at ease and they say music from Asia same so all kinds of stuff going on today, I'm, gonna be cursing a little bit. There will be some cursing coming up, so this would not be the one that you want to share with you with your sensitive friends and origin.

Ok! Well, let's say children who are not familiar with swear words I'm pretty sure any kids under fourteen or older, is going to be fine, and you probably shouldn't show this to everybody was under fourteen, but anybody over fourteen is heard all the words right by the way have you ever heard of talk to each other slot. Worse than what I say, sir, The damage done by way there, does your warning, but first Topic is I'll, be swearing on the very next topic in case in case you're wondering the very next topic will have some anger and cursing and then we'll get back into the fun stuff but first there might be an Alzheimer vaccination according to the telegraph, vaccine against Alzheimer's disease. They could be on the right. because it's worked in mice, they actually.

Yeah, I see fear common, Kirby I'll get back to it, and it actually reversed memory loss in mice. What how do you reverse memory loss? How do you do that apparently? Thus avoiding? Oh, oh there's something wrong. I have done Something very bad you noted is right. you do All you need is a copper among our last integra jealousies, dynamic anti drug last. Estralla very kind, fill it with your favorite, liquid ally, coffee join me now for the emperor. Old pleasure, the dope only the other day. The thing that makes everything better accept your memory apparently is.

all the simultaneous up an app is now go. I dont know how I went looked so long without but now all systems are operating one hundred percent, one hundred percent, so yes, Sir, this vaccination, allegedly their works, only animals that gives them their memory, their memory back now and the story goes on to describe exactly how they do it in that actually sounds like something that works. They found the exact problem with the memory and they reproduce day while they created a vaccine that operates directly against that memory. Loss element well here a few thoughts on this number one. Why are we calling this a vaccination? Anybody did. Did you notice

but that it did you uncritically, except that this was a vaccination, did any of you say vaccination that doesn't sound like a vaccination done. It. Well, I guess it could be used as a preventive, so it could be a prophylactic if you get a shot their thinking there. Maybe it might actually be a vaccination, My actually be the actual vaccination that prevents you from getting Alzheimer's, but I don't think so. I think but they're looking at is something that makes it a lot back. Right does I think they're saying that we think if you take this vaccination, you'll never get Alzheimer's. I think they're saying if you get the vaccination of, might not affect you as much.

So you ve noticed that the definition of a vaccination is just completely changed. Now. Vaccination therapeutic are basically the same thing at this point. What makes it a vaccination is that they give a tuna and the shock. Am I wrong? I think that this point we're gonna, call anything in a shot of acts. If it helps at all so uttered off, that's meaningful, but words, words have just started to drift meeting. Maybe more than usual, Here's the funniest comment on this Alzheimer vaccination article from James Referee or perfunctory. I don't know how to is less named starts with p s, which one is silently after the p, P, F, F, F, P, r, L, a

preferably from one why wages have actually says that about the Alzheimer vaccination biting Since my back hilarity soon follows I did what is a pretty funny covered? You can imagine even imagined Biden getting the shot two years hours on it exists, a shot and they see binds there exists a shot because wait. I did what now. if I've taught you- and I think I've taught many of you had to write jokes right. How many of you have seen any of my tutorials about writing humor? I guess most of them have been locals platform, so I don't think the youtubers to see but one of the tricks of writing humor is that you created

Duration, where people can fill out the punchline in their mind, so you give them the boost, the law. EL, the burgeoning Biden, saying quote: I did what, but the beauty of the punchline is the main issue. Imagine the foreseen so the scene that you put in there is in her own mind, is not in the joke the job. he's just as one line I did what and then you just imagine the fullness of the same. That is a good job that you can't be that form of humor or somebody s recreate the details and read from Europe. So there's your humor humor writing trick for the day I'd like to get into a little bit of swearing next. Have you heard of a book called white fragility, white fragility, and these are the right way to

rigidity and the s new. Is the white people feeling bad if anybody else gets some good stuff from like that? You know that racist right white fragility- you couldn't say that about anybody else, that's purely races. It's not even a little bit. This is like the old school. You know systemic anything here, direct racism well. Apparently, since we haven't we meeting anybody who doesn't but not pushed back on that I gotta comment today on twitter from it doesn't matter what the topic was. But the comment to me was that the white eggs have the softest shells. It was a comment about my

ethnicity and a suggestion that I'm extra sensitive, because I'm right. Sir, I responded back you racist piece of shit. You know I dont know what to far looks like You know that I identifies black because I've been discriminated against so severely in my life. That's not a joke! If anybody, if anybody's new to me, none joke. I literally died edifies black, because I can those rules The rules are. I can identify really what I want and that's why identify with the most and also I like to be in the winning team. If I a choice, a big on them. Then came the lose into him. Why would you please? Would you pick the losing doing so? I think the winning having black Americans or ascending white Americans.

Do something, and I like to give some of those benefits I'm allowed the rules. Allow me to do that. So I'd like to get some of those benefits. You should do cuz. It's what everybody nobody is excluded, defining their own, their own situation, but I would like to say this to all the people who would like to get away with colleagues white people who I don't. I then, if I with, but I still support there, are still support their struggle. When you say why eggs are the softest shells fuck, you fuck, you fuck your family fuck, you every article every particle in your fucking races, piece of shit body fuck, you completely drop dead. if you can go in public, say races, bullshit directly, not even a hint again fuck you,

if you want to see how fragile my shell is, don't fuckin pushmi does cuz gonna find out So, every time you see the ceo the way fragility- and you know why people are sense, and even the Karen stuff. By the way, I think white people should be able to call why women currents nobody else. Nobody else. It was with me I I'm not. I don't identifies a white person, so I'm just supporting the struggle of the people who are. I'm going start using the n

Using the inward because first of all identify as black, but secondly, if if white women can be called Karen's, that's ok with everybody obeys. Ok with that, don't push it now. I've been very much in favour of the inward being excluded from civilised society, so horrible org, should be banned. Rumour now, of course, free speech of course, can benefit both in terms of what feels right, as you know, a human being like everyone here that were so, I'm ok without exception right, it's like a minor exceptions, but I feel like there's a little bit to taking advantage going on.

don't you think so for those who would like to call a white people, Karen's and fragile fuck you, you pieces of racist shit, Lillian. By then slogan, build back better there was a observation by Spike Cohen on Twitter nexus observations or build back better build. What would be another word for build to build something make you make something rebuild it? that is somewhere. What would be another nowhere for back as its used in this? Not we're not talking to the back on your body, but back in this and means historically back to take us back to something sore like again. Yes, we're like again to back it's like again.

and then better. What will be another word for that so the service synonym for better or great, if it isn't Better than it was probably great. So literally bilbil better is just make Amerika great again, I'm it leaves out the America part, because the Thames, like America, as much but all it is just a copy of is literally just a copy of make Amerika great together, they just change the words And somehow I didn't notice, how did I, this long without noticing that is just as just mega. How do we do that? Did any of you notice before? how in the world did we not notices, is their free is freaky is my job to notice this stuff right is on the way,

Guy is literally my job to notice. I didn't see it so good. Good observation, spike, Cohen,. Because I'm a fair and balanced, I will tell you the fake news on CNN. But I also tell you the fake NEWS on Fox NEWS: do you think that Fox news of residues, fake news well. You be the judge. So here's a Fox news headline four thousand background. A couple hours appeared an event with Biden and Some other person was introduced, This calmly Harris goes to the Lecter. So calmly walks up to the letter and then the voice of God. You know the the announcer says introducing, and then it was just some other person that they were going to introduce after her now.

come on. I saw cobblers getting marked by the conservatives for being distant being in this or situation, but either completely different taken, and I'm not sure why obviously subjective, but my take on it is that she handled perfectly actually want best things, I've seen or do in public. Do you disagree? Here's where I saw so she didn't creates a situation right. She was cast into this situation, she gets up there, she's ready to talk, and then the voice introduces a different person is looking shook up. She smiled and hears here's a little public speaking tip for you, the pause, the pause. There is nothing harder than pausing for to sack

when some like that happens, because the pause gives you time to think. But you don't you don't give yourself that pause when you in front of a crowd, usually just start talking and something silly comes out, but she paused. Now that's the first time I've seen poise of of the professional kindly expect from a top level politician sheep, Was and then what was her then require was she goes she smiles and she goes in a moment and then she goes on with a thing. It was kind of permanent kind of perfect right now,

if you, if you now familiar with my commentary, I've been just brutal about Kamel Heiresses public persona, it's just so clingy. This horrible also thought worst, I've ever seen honestly dishonestly, the worst ever received, but at this moment I thought she handled it. as well as I could be handled. I don't think that could have been better anyway. Here's how Fox NEWS writes about it. Now you should also know that sea and then had a really critical report of calmly Harris yesterday. So though, that's your background. Fox NEWS headline. Whitehouse announcer appears to skip commonly Harris infrastructure Bill signing after disastrous CNN report,

So the way has an answer appears the skipper after the disastrous report. Do you think that these things are connected? Do you think, there's a connection between the CNN report and the White House announcer skipping her? No, no there's no connection and and and You get to the bottom of the article and it even says it's probably no connection. This probably just a mistake, and you have the announcer and there's nothing else. So they write this whole fake news headline that make you think that maybe the way houses turned against calmly errors so much that there are not even going to introduce a right that didn't happen. Nothing like that happened. The headline is pure lose and if they cover this accurate,

They say the announcer made a mistake and Harris adaptively handled it. That should abandon the news. The news should have done the announcer medicine, mistake and the vice president adaptively adaptively annulled. Now I saw tweet from land at Lattimer the other day about steel, been arguments And a steel man argument is, when you argue the other side as convinced we as possible before you give your counterpoint. So if you can describe the other side's argument perfectly you're here, debate against it really is weak. Could you not even debating the right thing you're debating the strongman? So if you get, if you can't say something good legitimately about the other team,

nobody should take you seriously. I won't. If I see you say nothing good about the other side ever I don't take you answers just know that. Just know that I will never take you seriously if you can't say something good about the other side, Something does there's always somethin right if you can say anything good, you're, probably then, pc. So that was my saying something good about Harris. So the next time I criticise, or you should pathetic context- and I will it is a question for you name up I didn't success and the successes subjective right, but name abiding success, president. That wouldn't have happened anyway, just on his own, no matter who is present name, somebody There would have happened just anyway would the stock,

Have gone up, probably probably now I gave I gave trumpet credit for the stock market because he cut taxes or was planning to cut taxes and then did, as he also directly talked it up. Which is actually good, technic stock markets and the economy itself, work on persuasion and psychology. that was. There was a reason that you could quite see if you can see the connection trumpeted acts. The stock market responded, so that case, I think you guys aids get some other credit, but maybe not all that right does the economy tends to go up. but I don't see anything. The Biden did. That would be good for the stock market. Did you what would be the argument? That Biden did something to help the stock market. Anything the infrastructure bill. Does that help to stop? Nor does it

You saying infrastructure, but isn't are just as much argument that are safe for spending And though you're spending on the wrong things, in some cases okay I'll, give you that I'll give you in for structure box. Here's the second point: don't you think the infrastructure deal would have happened anyway? I do see, I think Congress kick that can down the road as long as I can kick it, and then something was going to happen. they needed, they needed the democratic majority, but they also need some Republicans too to cross the line I feel like that would just would have happened anyway, because you can, you can go for ever without doing a bill on the most important things in the country right Congress just can't gulf wherever they got into a Sunday. So just happened now about the employment numbers. I don't think by net anything to do with it.

So that probably would have been fine. How about vaccinations, I don't know, are they better or worse has as Biden to handle the pandemic better or worse than trump? Who knows how about Afghan pull out? It was literally scheduled under Trump's administration. We imagined trumpeted better, but we don't know so. As far as I can tell there's nothing, nothing really here except you could make it argument for the infrastructure bill, but I think it would have happened anyway. Now do the same thing was chop. Did tromp accomplish anything that you say well, that was gonna happen anyway, no matter who is in charge so Trump was tough on the border. Was I going to happen anyway? No, no, it wasn't gonna happen anyway. That was suddenly. He did that nobody else was going to do about Trump base

Lee coming down the problems with North Korea was Biden. Gonna do that now there's no chance. Biden was gonna, have a personal relationship with Cuba, German, which would effectively change the entire security situation, and I feel like I could go through example, after example, of something that Trump accomplished, that you couldn't really imagined. Somebody else doing that my friends is why I supported it, not because every he does is better than everything anybody else steps. I've never believed that. What I believe is that sometimes you need to disrupt her, and it's just good for the system could have been a Democrat depending on the type of disruption. but sometimes you need somebody just gotten breaks. It just go just skull, break everything and then put it back together, better bill, the back better.

So I got what I wanted and of Trump. Of course, I did not anticipate the degree of animosity that could be generated, a measure, anybody that, which is certainly a negative. I was shocked by the Rittenhouse. Prosecution is ready, update and now, since I started, I thought they were done with the closing arguments. Are they not done with them aside headlines says: maybe there are continuing with them? Have we gone to jury? It? Can somebody give me an update? Have they go into the jury. Oh yes, they have gone over the jury. Ok, let's talk about this, so the Rittenhouse defence or outside the prosecution has put on a good defence. Now everybody say: well, that's not my clever idea, but it is certainly true. If you look at it, it looks like the prosecution argue, the defences case.

By years of the crazy things they said in closing the We have a right to self defence if you're the one with the gun. What that's just, not true you as legal scholars and basically anybody with a brain has told you now. If the other, so there's gonna kill you one where the other you could Europe shoot away? then the one of the prosecutors in the closing statement said Sometimes we all have to take a baby. What sometimes we will have to take a beating, as sometimes we have to punch legs, it's true, but it may be true that sometimes people get buildings, but you don't have to take one. If I can give you some advice, if you have a gun and somebody's beating, you viciously Europe,

my advice so and then there was the year the judge, instructions so you're. The judge was. here's my take on the judges instructions. I don't think you're going to see this take anywhere else. So I want to see if I can convince you that my take his writing ready. So I dont think you ve seen this, but I have heard every pundits. Maybe somebody is on the same point: So the judge was giving the instructions to the jury, and by saying that if you find the defendant guilty of the top charge you're the most aggressive one, then you don't need to condemn. does the lesser charges or lesser sir. If you find the top charges valid you're done, then he said, but if you find that the top charge is not valid and you find

Ok, here's the key phrase and you find that he acted in self defence than the judge stopped himself and he couldn't go on. We realize it talked himself into a trap which he admitted you say. I think I taught myself into a trap. He said it differently, but he admitted he talked himself into a trap. What was the trap? What was the trap? What was the judge realizing he had just done. I think why he had just done is basically. Told them that if it looks like self defence, there was nothing else to think about now he didn't say that, but it was pretty close. The sounding like that.

If it was, if you thought it was self defense you're sort of done here now, I don't think he meant to say that right. But it's true. It's true. Meaning that if it looked like self defense is really not much else to talk about, because the gun charge was thrown out right. So I feel as if he he biased the jury. Jordan, acquittal in a way that he realized he had done ass. He was doing it and then he tried to back it up now. Here's the problem. There is no evidence of a crime.

So the judge in giving his his instructions being completely aware that there is no evidence of a crime and all was simply being honest, and I think you rise. He couldn't be completely honest because they just that he just sat through and presided over a thoroughly corrupt process, which I think is gonna, get us give us the right answer, but at least the prosecution party was thoroughly cropped. I mean I don't know how the prosecutors don't go to jail. Honestly, I dont know I I understand the process that the prosecutor doesn't go to jail for this. Have you not good for their prosecutors, red blood in jail.

quality of persuasion of the closing arguments. I didn't watch them enough, but what I did watch look like. Neither none of them were good. So my take on both the defense and the prosecution is that none of them were especially good at their job. Did you have the same impression? In fact, I would go further. It look like the defence nor the prosecution were even trains and persuasion. Did you see anything that looked like they were trained in persuasion, the trends in the law and the others? Little persuasion he stuff on there, but it doesn't look like they know, persuasion there were just terrible, real, I'm really terrible inside both.

France and the prosecution kept repeating the other ones case now. I know you have to do that for contacts to stop at the way they were doing it s just like it was reinforcing the other side I felt like it was terrible in both cases. That was my that was my take. Yeah, the other men to boring. That's right, so both the both sides made their presentations to boring. So there won't be any sticky ports, the The secret to having a good persuasion is that the parts Yathrib number the people will remember ten percent of what you say. So you got to make sure that the ten percent their number is really really important. So I don't think the either side did that

I think they treated all like it was just one big soup of stuff and you you'd be lucky. If you remember anything, Johnny Cochrane would be the standard for persuasion. I saw a clip of tubing unseen s, CNN, saying that the the judges instructions, jury were all terrible. Which sort of such or suffer a riot doesn't because now have a reason for thinking. It was an illegal trial or illegitimate and he provided the reason why the jury instructions were so bad that the jury did not come to a good.

It feels like CNN is trying to set us up now again when I say that I dont mean they plan that, like they are meeting, they say, let's try to create a riot I'll. Take that. I think that everybody just follows the money, even if a convincing themselves are not so this. In a situation like this, the hypnotist would say all the people are telling the truth when they there. They think they're. Just talking about the news, and if you put him on a lie, detect you'd say: are you trying to create a riot? They would also now and they would all pass the lie. Detector would find no no sign of life, but

As I often tell you, you can always predict where things are going by following the money. So is it a coincidence that the sea, then people say exactly what will make them the most money? I don't think so. It's not a coincidence because, as always is, percent of the time it never goes, the other way is sometimes what the other ways that could be a coincidence, but have never goes the other way. It just means that follow the money works, even when the people down other doing it. What was copied dunams MSNBC Msnbc apparently showed the prosecutors closing statements, but not the defence. Now again, If you were to put a lie, detector on the MSNBC producers, You said: why did you do that

They say you now we just thought we'd like to get us a good riot here. We'll just show the prosecutor now now about nobody here. I thought about everybody. There most MSNBC simply thought they were making programming decisions. Probably said to themselves well when the defensive speaking, thus our highest raided show You don't wanna put that off, so for a lower rated show. Oh that's just when the the prosecution is talking I'll, betcha, they could pass allied detector test saying that they did it for just regular programming interest and had nothing to do with trying to make anything happened. Now I see some people disagree, some saying that they absolutely know what they're doing. Go back. You know, I'm not gonna do. Actually. I don't think Allah press that point further because

I certainly do have absolute certainty that nobody knows what they're doing here. So this might be a case where they knew exactly what they're doing I'll give you that I'll I'll give you that it might be a case where they know it. Exactly what to do it but I'll always say that does not necessary is not necessary. They know they're doing because it's going to happen in the way they are going to follow the money either way. Sometimes they know it sometimes it out if you think they know it. In this case, I, wouldn't, I wouldn't say, you're wrong, assume our right. I got this comment from Josh Jordan. Blue check diameter and when I saw the ceiling was trying to maybe start a riot. He said sarcastically, yes,. Tiny, CNN audiences going to store rise because tube in said the instructions were botched sarcasm. Now here's my first response.

It's not the tiny CNN audience that matters, it's their online presence and the fact that they give give all the Democrats there talking points it matters who watches and imagine who sees the clips and stuff online so, if you think that citizens reach is, you stand there live audience, it's not it's now basin at all I think they use the life programme just create clips for their online content is mostly a website at this point is basically website. Does anybody have any data? Maybe you can find it while I'm on your find me, the number of viewers for the sea then website or their content anyway, confided versus the number of live viewers should be a gigantic difference. I think gigantic dozens anyway, since my first complaint, then just yard and went on, he said just imagine what could happen

someone with a real audience, like the President of the United States, told everyone. A national election was rigged. Oh, so what about that? So Trump did tell the nation that the election was rigged, so As this question back the java, I said what was I supposed to say if he believed it was true and I'll ask you the same. russian, so many of Us- and I would include myself. we're not impressed with the way Trump has handled the loss. Is that fair to say you can be a supporter and still say you don't like the way you handled the loss? You might not like what he talked about the January six stuff, you might not like that. He complained as much as he did about the election big fraudulent in his.

But let me ask you this: what if he believed it was true? Well, levies, little back up, do you think he believed ass? You do you think the trump honestly believes the election was stolen. I do I think I honestly believe that now, if he honestly believes it and at the time he was Still, president of the United States, do you president, who doesn't tell you that what is the better situation. is the better situation that he lies to us, or the rolls over did the Republicans

a lion or a kitten. If the Republicans had to get elected a kitten, then yes, they be quite happy if he rolled over, even if he thought he shouldn't that's what kittens do we like to the kitten? You don't expect. Global fight, but Republicans elected a lion, and they got one they get here, actually what they elected right. It was a lie and supposed to do I was supposed to be a lion so trump. If I had to guess, we can't read his mind, but I'm sure he thinks, I mean I think they are really high. The he thinks he one now.

My opinion is probably have more to do with the actual legal stuff behind the scenes before the election, probably less to do with how the election was counted, but still stolen election it's just stolen legally, so you can still election legally and I think that's exactly what happened. I also add this thought that the election, the system is in a category, is in the category of big, complex things, that are somewhat opaque. Neither. you and I have never seen the code for the young. The electronic parts of the system right, invisible to us and if you ask for the code they wouldn't give it here so are like The system is not transparent by design. It's not even intended to be transparent and there's big money involved. Big.

Stakes so in this situation. If it's complicated his bag and lots of money in its transit is not transparent, of fraud will happen. Every time fraud will happen every time. The only thing you now is how much and whether there was enough this time so however, the I have no proof that there was fraud that change the election outcome and I see a troll overrun on Youtube saying that the tea rump lost Kapital letters lost now. I've said that, from the start, I said that the system which we respect even with its flaws, we respect this- is the system elected by. I accept

they want, which is different from whether it should ever whether was fair, but this this system. Unfortunately, we have to support the system over the result. If you want the republic to stay together, Sometimes the system's gonna give us around result, actually lots of times If you tear down the system, we have more trouble than if you, if you argue with the result, so In my opinion, it is unknowable but and that of course, Josh came back with the court's didn't find anything. And then I responded with the courts are not designed to find fraud in elections and in fact they mostly ruled that they didn't have standing or that it was too late to ask so coarse, didn't make any ruling spell fraud in the politics insider, which I guess it's part of business insider

assume their booty judges, the most powerful transportation secretary, because he's got this one boy trillion infrastructure bill that he can do well, to which I say: did I did I imagine the Biden appointed a infrastructures are. Did I just imagine it and as the infrastructures are not the one who would make all these decisions that we're just attributed to budget? What am I missing just confused by the story? It did I miss a story that somebody else was put in charge of this and who does that person reported? Maybe they report to Buttigieg, but it's still going to be somebody else doing the hard work right. Thank you. Goose. anyway, I'm just confused that causes to stories that are opposite similar, both in the news at the same time,

Have I told you before that you should not reject your opponents arguments because I've never works. You should get inside them, then. So here's a persuasion, Tipp again giving the example of it. You should get inside your opponents don't say it's all wrong. Wear it like a suit and then and then change it for the inside. Now, when Trump was first running for president, he was accused of not being a republican enough right, but instead of speaking Anti Republican, which wondered work. He became more republican than Republicans. He basically got inside their argument, so it makes sense instead of saying? No, I am. I am one he'd be outside the arrogant argue as people now I M Republican, I'm republican. He became more republican than Republicans right

as soon as he became more republican? The Republicans? It was hard to say anything about him because he was more republican. Then they were. He was harder on the border than they were all that stuff harder on YO police, police, etc. So that's one example. Let me go you another one and I'll use it about critical. Is there a Sephora. You don't like critical race theory in school and your arguing Stella my school. What's the other side say, there's no critical race theory in school. Ok now you say Sir, is yes, sir, is get it out there and then the other sites is not another. As you white supremacist now does not. So you notice, how be ours the argument gets. You know traction. the alternative get inside the earth.

Critical re SIRI totally totally. Totally is not happening, but do you know what is happening The schools are not teaching critical race theory, so son model. My argument here, I agree with you Democrats when you say that, there's no critical re SIRI data. The school. You are one hundred percent correct, now watch what I'm doing before you before you react watch what I'm doing on entering the argument not debating it entering yeah. critical race, there no no way being taught in schools. There are no examples of it. You give me one example of critical race theory being taught in schools. Critical discriminatory theory is above school level a sort of a college level concept and it is not in schools.

But you notice, do you know what is in schools? Systemic critical risks there isn't any direct critical re SIRI. I totally agree with the Democrats. There's no critical re SIRI, but there is systemic meaning that if you were to look at how the lessons are being taught, you can see us embedded in the lessons. Were there the name so I started the hashtag hitters out. Somebody on the other side was using it already, but that's funny systemic security. Now likewise when, Likewise, when the Democrats say hey, there's lots of systemic racism in the world,

Do you say no, there isn't we're, not a racist country cuz. If you do you're losing the argument. That's a terrible argument. The worst argument is no. There isn't now there isn't, there's no critical race theory, terrible you'll never get an inch without argument. Instead, Get inside it get inside it. If you get inside it, you say: yeah, there's systemic racism is the biggest frickin problem, the country. In this honest, because I think that. I think systemic racism is the biggest problem in the country as it is expressed by the teachers. Unions, see what did first, you get inside the argument by agreeing with a totally Yahoo com

pacing, but I'm gone further as not just pacing. You have to get inside the argument you after you have to wear like clothes and then you can do something with it like you have to put around like like a jacket and then you can move the arms and stuff. But until you put the jacket on you got nothin you shouldn't blanks, yeah like spin into the ocean do nothing, but as soon as you say, yeah can I help you give her the systemic racism, and if you will Gray will work on the biggest problems. First, who says no to that. who says no to working on the biggest problem. First, nobody, so now you're inside the argument, your agreement stomach racism. Is this. You say: are you happy with how black, kids and other people of color or being taught nobody says? Yes noble?

nobody will say yes, do pretty good those black students are getting just as good education as everybody else. Nope nope nobody's say that so now, you're totally inside the argument you die, then, if I'd the biggest form of systemic racism, you got them to agree now. What can we do about this? The teachers yields the ones preventing preventing competition in schools and without competition. Nothing works. Nothing works without competition, no exceptions. So that's how you get inside an argument, here's a provocative, sexist disgusting opinion that might nonetheless be accurate. here's where I might get cancelled, I might Lucy.

So this is a tweet by a twitter username Stephan, nobody. I know and on this topic, you said, our teachers unions are primitive, predominantly female. Although here is female, do good reason, which is properly channel through religion and charity, but in this case is being transformed into a political offensive. He said, Have somebody else pointed out that this was Hitler's technique as well, that the Hitler use was more about the girls? If you ever heard that I never heard of that before, so I can't

do a fact check on it. But the idea was that when you can use the boys to be like a healer youth Liam, that was that worked but convincing the girls was more important because they would be raising the kids convincing. The girls was. The important point is that gets you forever. these are the ones raising the kids and when we see that women predominate are dominating the teachers. Unions- and we see the teachers unions are used to perpetuate, says, perpetuates systemic racism and keep black people down, especially, it looks like a woman problem. Doesn't it now let levy stop here and say I am not buying into the argument totally. So I'm not buying into this argument,

I'll, tell you what the argument is, because I think is its provocative enough. Little is worthy to be in the next, but every time you say it's all about women are all about man you're automatically into biased, bigoted territory right. So I don't wanna be indicative territory by saying it's, Woman problem, but it is true that women mostly are responsible for raising is still too does, doesn't need to be in blah blah blah plenty of men doing their job and plenty of gays. Is really about, but it is still true in general, mostly female, raising the kids. right. I was software abandoned so bad and refuse to talk to Congress. They find it in contempt and he turned himself in and then he said you he vowed Upload the Biden regime, as he calls it and to make the charter

against whom God misdemeanor from Hell. For the Democrats, believes that Biden ordered Merrick to add to go after Bannon. So he says is basically a political political which now here's the fun park, the fund part when the Democrats go after the founder of bar stool sports, taken, they could take a pretty by the big bite at him loose doing a great job are fighting back so idols, he's gonna get cancelled, but we is mostly the defensive stance when you say I mean going offence against specific media groups that went against them, but mostly just trying to survive.

Alex Joneses. I guess you lost a lawsuit that could be really bad for Alex Jones and he might. It may be that the left has taken Alex Jones off the field. I don't know that's true, but this lawsuit that he lost looks pretty pretty bad, might might just take him also feel banana, but do not ban and isn't he isn't? One of those people Bannon has let's say that's a ban. Is game is at a different level and. I think that it possibly a gigantic mistake to give him this much attention in order me, because this power is going up is not going down if they Bob

And then in jail for this he will be the leader here with the leader of the Republicans. And he's not even asking to be right he's not even try that doesnt sort of not his deal. He wants me influential, but it does need to be the top guy, but you put him in jail, returns into Nelson Mandela. Do you know who knows that ban that it knows it now? You can't do right using energy monster. That is correct. He learned from Trump if he didn't already now But he is anti fragile. Now there are too many people like that, but if they don't take, ban and now he's gonna, take them out. So, unlike going after some lesser pundits,

If you take a runner Alex Jos- and you don't take him out well, it was worth a shot right, didn't take him out, but it is worth a shot. There's no real downside to their cause. He's gonna, say bad things about democratic, no matter what right. But if you don't take back out. you're just making him stronger, and I don't think anybody has quite a good sense of how strong Bannon's game is at this level and you're going to be surprised as what I think so bad and houses prices. I buy didn't, had a zoo. Call or something like it with China's head: she, and I d Thank you and strong Adam was to say that, but yours

China has now surpass the United States in wealth. China is the wealthiest country now Now, how do u win a war in twenty twenty one? Is it with bombs? Well, if it's a big powers, fighting a tiny power, yes, but what? If a superpower is an adversary to another superpower, what is the weapon of choice, its money, its money? Whoever has the most money is condemning. That's China now. So as long as China has the most money in today are the most powerful influence in the world. Cuz that money you can bribe stuff, VIC and create industries that can destroy industries. It can do everything Money is power. So as long as China's richer by the news there bitch and certainly act that way, he told is he told she

bite ended they as concerns over human rights abuses, really, as concerns I've met about president, she was shaken not until he had concerns about my ethnic cleansing. Do you know what concerns about human rights abuses somebody? to tell she to his face, we believe you are involved in ethnic cleansing of the workers and the fact that you dont let international people come and take a look. We consider proof. No I can say that to shake him. Do you know that if Hitler had abandoned control of more of the supply chain, he would have gotten away with the holocaust? Sorry,

if Germany had the same control of the supply it is. China does right now they could have done the holocaust and just gone on. You know, that's fucking, true! You do. That's what I'd do they're doing their little holocaust and they're just go ahead, but can You know that saying never again. Well, perhaps as people use it, they are referring to the jewish situation, specifically, never again, But clearly is going to happen again, as is happening now and were Lebanon happen and we're ok with it. So that's, that's your government rather there another imported handled differently, like a thank you would, but I don't know that

of course than those that Taiwan question and she warned against. I guess Abiden warned. China is doing anything unilaterally or now you would like a sheet. She warned Biden against doing anything unilaterally about status. one danish newspaper reported that Biden issuer China, that, U S, recognizes Taiwan to be a part of China. A danish newspaper reported this, as fact that binding said yeah China, we Taiwan is partly join now. I didn't believe that until last somebody on Twitter to send me the headline shirt off, I may add, translate on Google and there it is. The Danes believes that the binding just gave Taiwan to China. I mean obviously I'm framing wrong, but you know them.

I like order the interpreters, because I wonder if there was an interpretation problems, you wonder how they could get to that level of fake news. Our age Rasmussen has a new pole. Did I tell you there is going to mean something shocking me out today. Here's something shocking innate in a pool their people were asked if they would favour the GEO Pe or the democratic candidate. For that. I was in the Senate and the mid term elections and the GEO p is favoured by thirteen points. Thirteen point of difference.

in what voters say they would vote for in twenty twenty to thirteen points and that doesn't count the retirements cuz. It could be a lot of democrat retirements. Apparently that have been announced. Dorset were assumed two thousand and twenty two is just going to be. It looks like now I mean you could say you can't trust, poles and there's plenty of time to go, and that's all true, but I also saw that in the same way that thirty percent of black citizens would vote Republican, thirty percent, that's him high do you apparently has been as high as forty percent in the past, but thirty percent seems high doesnt. So there's that

I told you the quantum computing, maybe a problem, because it can break encryption, but these smart people in that world told me that we now have encryption that can't be broken by the. Computers and even the quantum we have now. It's a hundred cubits adapt to be two thousand cubic to break our current current stuff and thus not going right away. So basically there's a there's, a continuous war of the encrypt hers verses. These young people can break encryption and so far the encrypted around. So we don't have to worry that much about quantum computing breaking encryption. That is my show for the day. I've gotta go do other things. I hope you enjoy this. The hope you enjoy the swearing. overconfidence can be fatal. True

Actually, fifty million cubits. You say I guess it depends which encryption you're going to try to break as often I'll talk to you later,