That's the guy I woke up today and I thought to myself. I wonder if Chicago is ready for the simultaneous up and then I saw a comment go by just as I was thinking that essentially cargoes Very good work Chicago well today is an amazing day for all of you. Not only are you lucky enough to join us all here for the best thing that ever happened? It's called coffee was got atoms, The rush you days will be pretty good too pretty good, and if you like to make this a little extra, I know you do. I know you

You like a little extra, I need, is a copper mugger glass, a tanker gels, static, anti drug of last, a vessel of any kind fill it with a favorite liquid, Ella Coffee and join me now for the world pleasure, the doubly the other day, the thing that makes everything better Scott the simultaneous go. Yes, I see a comment locals but wondering if in Chicago when you do simultaneous up, do you I meant to the gunfire, or do you just do it plain and let the gunfire do his own thing, sort of single been was wondered about them. While impossibly the biggest news in the entire world, although I might be biased,

Job Jesus on Twitter has suggested that I need new kicks. For those of you who are not upon the latest language. Kicks means for where four, where I need some new footwear does apparently I'm unfashionable and if we start from the ground up well, I could be honoured years old before we're done, but let's get to footwear right first now, here's the problem, do you know who makes stylish clothes for old white guys anybody who makes so? Can you give me the name of the company that makes stylish close for old white guys.

that's right. Nobody has thus Grech nobody. Nobody is not even a thing, but because I doubt if I as black, I'm hoping that will give me some style advantage, which I can say because identifies black. If you said it would be racist, but my need all the help I can get so was work on that top priority for the country restless another pole but Gunnar ownership, and can you guess what percent of households have a gun. now, when I say households I mean at least one person has access to a gun within the home. What percentage of the total population do think? Let or Essentially, what percentage of Republicans do you think so?.

organs were only fifty one percent. I a thought to be a lot more when you expect Republicans to be seventy five percent plus, But even if you look at the whole household, only fifty one percent had guns dams are thirty April. and this was the most surprising thing there isn't really that much difference between fifty one and thirty eight, when you're asking yourself who likes guns, Democrats have alot guns, I'm not sure I quite understood that democratic were so gun heavy, but it explains Lothar. The explains why we're gonna, ship or gun rights remain and robust. There's just plenty of people have got and then Rasmussen asked people's opinion is said if the federal government had a list of gun owners

likely will they someday use that list to confiscate your gun Thirty two percent said very likely, and this is of all voters and twenty one percent. As somewhat less fifty three percent, I think it's very or somewhat likely that their guns would be taken away. So over that half the country over half of the country is concerned that, if they're on a list they're going to be taken away to feel like that's a pretty reasonable Worry Yuther there's a lot of stuff and pushed back on, but I do feel like this is quite reasonable and is part of a larger. Doesn't it which is the more the government knows about you, the more control they have you now? Knowledge is power. The more knowledge the government has about you more power, they have over you and less you can get away with right.

If they knew exactly are you did your taxes they might? They might want to talk to you so and I think there's something about humans that we don't like to admit, but I'm gonna admitted on behalf of all humans. There are a number of perfectly legitimate reasons to one privacy from your government. You don't want them to have two inch power. You just go. People in your business freedom but centre right. So there is plenty reasons: do not want the government in your business, but one, Big ones we never talk about this. Most people are crooks. We don't say that one but the fact is: if the government knew what everybody was doing all the time, we shall be in jail, pretty much everybody's breakin, some crime, even if you just speeded you do in some of them.

probably you ve, probably defamed somebody. I mean that, although that would require losses but yeah if you, if you took him to the level of cheating on taxes, pretty much everybody be in jail, bread, much. The accounts, as he celebrates the right of liberal stone guns, but it doesnt work the other way. He is that's true. So, there's that apparently school accordingly axles had a report that forty percent of school districts, more than a thousand districts? They federal money to upgrade their age vex. Are there their air handling systems infiltration because of code. So forty percent of schools that that, but they have no idea if it makes a difference-

barely some of the schools or say, wait a minute wait a minute before we finish installing this. Can somebody tell us if this works the evidence whatsoever that changes the covert situation and the companies putting the men. Of course, don't have that evidence. apparently the the air filtration industry is totally corrupt. Did you know that I guess we could have guessed, there's some industries that you don't think about as big corrupt, for example, that the food food distribution industry, grocery stores, grocers or is it just a criminal enterprise? You just don't know it now I'll talk more about that in the future, but the whole food industry is just Thoroughly, corrupt, the I spend enough time there to see things that were just jawdropping and talk about normal big companies that you would know the names of the company doing things so on ethical or maybe illegal.

by is a really corrupted the butchers- the air filtration industry also just garbage and these make up and make up test results or they they tested away this completely unrealistic so that they can get good numbers. So so I guess billions of dollars and gone This thing that nobody knows if it works, I still think you're probably does, even if all it does is circulate the air better. so I'm gonna be on the side, the says or the protection. I guess that in the long run we will find the airflow is all that matters by want. Take that bet, here's my that in the long run, the only variable that will thus be a protective of who had who had covered and who was a risk will be airflow and everything else will be

and then vitamin d will probably be the most predictive of outcome, but in terms of transmission or better just airflow about that's it. About it does it one was last time somebody got uncovered in place, then good airflow can somebody tell me because these days we tend to be fairly good, guessing where somebody got something right one was last time you heard somebody got it outdoors whenever One was last time you heard that somebody got it eating at a restaurant, transfer actually pretty good airflow right. They tend to have higher ceilings, the other their built for lots of people in them. So I imagine a pretty good erflow, The restaurants in California, nobody wears a mask during eating and you're all packed in this room,

But have you heard of a big problem with restaurants? You haven't right We would know by now if people are getting this in restaurants, wouldn't we apparently that out- and the only thing that I can think of that would make sense for a restaurant- is that the air flows a little bit better? I am innocent if nothing else, people are coming and going to the doors open lot right, but I think they they generally have pleaded airflow. So, that's it that's my prediction: it will be all about airflow because of the the aerial near the airborne nature of this, compared to other viruses Article n inside sources by Kenneth Repose up, you talked about the climate deal and help. China, basically wins. And until he laid this out, I didn't realize how bad it was

I'm just gonna, give you the facts without much spam. I don't think there's a spin on us just the facts. China do agreed to Basically, I reduce some coal use right, so try not to read to reduce coal used by two thousand and thirty. Do you think China? that so that China is part of the deal is that they were written, reduce coal use by twenty thirty, what happens if they get to twenty thirty and they decide not to no penalty? China can just say they'll, do not just not do it. There's no penalty, So did we get anything from China except their promise, which is worth exactly zero mean laughably zero? I mean we don't even think there's any chance. It will keep their promises.

But it gets worse. So, while China is going to do basically nothing, that's what that's what they agreed to do effectively the United States is going to go really hard as solar panels. We're really gonna NEO increase our investment in solar. Do you know who make solar panels? China. Basically, bided went over their negotiating deal where China would give us a promise that they're not gonna keep about coal but we're going to keep our promise almost certainly do vastly by more stuff from China. Now here's the thing, by the solar panels from China, but who pays for the disposal of them because their pre toxic and hard to get rid of? That's us. So China guess! money? They do nothing in return, and then we get the police

and the unreliable source of electricity. Now, when I say solar is unreliable, there are at least two technologies that will change. That number one would be something like the Tesla gave your plan. Apparently, if you build enough of these gig lance you'd have enough storage to use these less dependable sources and still have the battery source to work at night The other is hydrogen, apparently Then some pretty big advances recently in hydrogen and hydrogen stores stuff fairly effectively better than batteries. Actually, so hydrogen storage can last longer than about restored and some big stuff, hydrogen hydrogen, so we by actually by brute force, get to appoint

whereas solar actually is more practical, then in his right now, but at the same time nuclear is already there. so nuclear is where solar wants to be consoler get there. Maybe, but nuclear is already there. Alex zones I should say he lost by default. This sandy hook, families lawsuit against them, because I guess Don't claiming that the sandy hook, shooting massacre was actors, it wasn't really real masker that people were actors. So the families that lost people in the actual real masker. That was not a guy oaks at all. pursued and I guess Alice Jones did not give them the documents they need. So you want keepers, I guess probably private or financial documents private, which Nancy,

defaults, so he loses the lawsuit just by not cooperating. But they haven't decided on the penalty. Yet what do you think the penalty will be and do you think Alex Jones would be able to pay it? I don't know if there's any insurance would cover this. I doubted how much you think he's going to have to pay. I will put a man of business. Have they take it Alex Jones completely off the table and is it We are still at one by one. Every trumps support from twenty. Sixteen has been cancelled, Now I'm not saying that they don't deserve. It is not my job to defend somebody else's speech that they said stuff. They pursued its their problem, not one, but

It does seem fairly, can system that everybody, who is a term supporters being targeted one way or another. Now let me ask you something has, as TIM Pool ever been targeted recently for by hippies Buddy has said. I don't know that came by telling as or better yet peace and TIM Pool recently, because if there isn't there will be- Oh yes, I'm saying yes, yes, big! Yes, yes, a temple is also been targeted. So he's in jail. Rogan I'm not sure. I would call him a job supporter, but just the fact that he is willing to deal in the middle of the reasonable middle and makes it more dangerous. I guess the left was fake news. What has faded somebody say, let's fake news, but

Tell me what you think is vacancies always says. He asked me whether Temple Lisbon Target now, of course, Balancement organisers. Oh now, Tuba Alex you provided everything. Well, the court doesn't fix him. The court says he didn't that's all. I know erosion is not a proper for sure, but he can see theses things through a novel filter which I think by its office is dangerous in this world. Are here's what I would like to see just to cause trouble? I would like to see a graph of which a liberal pundits match which can serve the abundance. Do you know me. Like who, who on the left their there Alex Jones? Who do you think, they'll day? Who won the left? Some?

MSNBC right here, who's the guy Anonymous Andy's, you there's a black guy in the busy MSNBC who the expert, and maybe you cyber or security or some with it. What is his name and the Somebody'Ll come up with here in a moment, You know what I'm talking about road nets. Yes, nance. A man, maybe the Alex Stones. But what here. Where's the graph I'd like to see so and pictures. Imagine graph that sort of a big upside down EU shape at that the EU would be any abundance on the left or right, or maybe the middle, who basically are pretty close to centre. So I would put, for example, small cottage from CNN and now you're you're thinking way the sea in any.

Be unbiased. Buddy, these relatively unbiased. If you watch is content, you don't you don't pick up anything they you pick up and the other the other sea in content, So until a small cottage at the top- and then maybe maybe you'd put a few other people, maybe maybe Joe Rogan somebody else. Serbia will this objective, of course, but then they ruined day Rubens example. But then, as you go down to the more extremes, you know with the alleged Jones here, what who would be the one on the left, the joy Red Bay? Where would you like to see that. yeah, I guess green world would be at the top at the top. Probably anyway, this graph, I wanna, see So let's talk about those were written Rittenhouse situation, I think you're all following it, and you know that the jury went home. I dont know if they ve started again as Injurie started again.

So my understanding is- and I would say this would be unconfirmed report. Would you agree? This is unconfirmed but were hearing. We're are in the whispers jack. The subject is reporting on this that There are two jury members who are holding out because of concerns over their own safety. How my first! Well, how do you think that's true? Do you think is true that the toujours are holding out because of concern for their safety. be careful. Be careful because you want to believe it's true right. So as soon as there's something that a story, this a little while to good use. medically be a little more alert them. Maybe that's too good for a reason.

So I would say you should remain sceptical about what's happening in the jury room because I dont know that we there's anyway to have a reliable report this early, but I will say that Jack's sources are better than most. So, if I had to guess, if you said Jim, you just have to put a better this. I would bet it's true. That's where my bet would be bad. There remain forty percent sceptical. I guess now. What do you think of those two yours choice, less, let's call it I, but that a goal and tolls confirm but suppose there, or toujours, who presumably were going to vote to acquit. Can we make that assumption, we make. The assumption is that there were two whole doubts. It probably men. Ten wanted to occur

and to also wanted to acquit but didn't wanna. Take the chance that your interpretation, we don't know to be true, but that sort of a reasonable interpretation right now. What do you think Those two years in the comments. Do do you back them, meaning that their choice was right for themselves? That ceiling Amateur was their choice right for themselves. I'm Susan, as you know some people understand, I see yeses cowards, cowards. Ok. Can I make a confession which at all think wont? Let me in jail, I hope not I once got out of jury duty for same reason that the alleged to people are holding out.

Imagine me on a jury. Now, imagine that we- I was well known at the time, and it was It was a case in which the guns were involved, I'll just be generic, so guns were involved? It was a dangerous situation, that's what the trial was about now, if I convicted somebody as part of the jury. What are the odds that my name would come out as one of the people who convicted a guy, and it was the third strike, so this was the one that puts him in jail for ever. What do you think it now? All the other jurors could be reached Billy anonymous right if I had been also reasonably anonymous, I wouldn't have any problem with that's the benefit of big anonymous. but I can't be anonymous. I dont have the option of being an arms. So in my case should open.

excused just automatically, and the answer is yes, I should have been excused because it would put me a risk and the system doesn't require me to take that kind of risk when there are other people who could do without the risk. So what do you think I did Do you think I waited for the court to decide how safe I would be fuck? No, no No, I'm not gonna, listen to the court. To tell me how fucking save I'm going to be that's my decision. That said, there's no there's no debate, then she's. My decision same will say the same reason. I'm against. vaccination mandates, you can decide what my safety level is thus up today. Now is that if the court, if the government is trying to keep me to save you like being a little too cautious? Well, maybe I do have some push,

two, but if the government is telling me to take a personal risk, that is, necessary. Another word gets the same result for the public with somebody was not me right. Just some other you're. I'm sorry! That's where the government now poor ways, That's what I say. I'm sorry! I don't support this government. Is you can't put me in danger personally, not personally. If you ask me to volunteer less different spy? Governments have a look. You're gonna, be in a little bit of extra danger, because people will know your identity. So if you don't want to do at this fine, but if you want here we'd love that ok, then I'll be ok. This is me voluntarily. The government making me give up my identity, because that's what would happen

So, let's just say that I got out of that trial on a list. My reason for getting out of the trial was true, but it wasn't the only reason, so I did give reason for it to be excused which didn't go over well with the court. Tell you my reason. I told the court that I favour a complete drug legalization since drugs were part of the part of the same. They were like ok around here, so And that was true enough that I wasn't lying alright Apparently, the Rittenhouse prosecution did not give the defence the high quality version of the drone footage, which would have looked very different from the enhanced version, nor the the low quality that.

That was shown in court. Now I dont nor the line is, apparently a prosecution has something like total love, total protection, they can't be prosecuted. That's true right. the prosecutors have absolute immunity. Can somebody confirm that I saw on twitter? It looked through. They can be disbarred sure, but there's no legal recourse right. They can just lie, they can introduce fake evidence. Right am I wrong about that? Is I dont think is qualified immunity I think, is absolute. So that's actually the question whether its qualified or absolute. I think its absolute. So I think the prosecutor probably knew he could just make up anything. Now I would say that what the prosecutor did

by any normal standard was certainly qualify as a horrible crime does Ebay does now it might, it might be a protected category if he's got immunity, S prosecutor and by the way I think, prosecutors We need immunity yeah. I don't like it in this case, but you know if you had to. If you had to create a system, I think the systems better when that the authorities are not worried about going so I get why we have that law, but certainly bad this case. I I completely back the to yours and I think they're heroes who, frankly, because I think those jurors need to to stand up to a system that apparently they were being doxed or they will be pictures and then take enough from Etcetera.

There have been threats. I have a little problem with the ten who stayed or the ten who are willing to make a judgment. I think the two who are refusing the heroes here Zobeide may disagree. Now I dont like the fact that this will hurt Rittenhouse. I dont like the fact that Rittenhouse might not get an widdle outright because I think he needs and acquitted. to navigate the rest of his life right? If the only thing that ends this trial is, what's it called? trial with prejudice, meaning that they wouldn't retry it. He couldn't be retried. But if you hear that somebody who was convicted of murder, If you're somebody was accused a murderer. and the only way they got off was a mistrial are.

Going to hear the wiz prejudice? Part? I'm your new. You don't hear those words right. You just here as mistrial. You say to yourself my god. He got away with murder I mean you're gonna, think he got away with murder, or least everybody left will and that's not anything like what's happening. Does the opposite he's at Instead of calling a mistrial would prejudice, you know they should call it extra innocent. Am I right if you call them Israel, he sounds guilty in my mind, even though it doesn't mean anything like that. But in my mind he sounds guilty. Am I right, in my view, One is that, if you hear me, trial. Don't you think guilty here's what they should call it extra. he's so innocent. You don't even eight injury to decide. He's so innocent that the I can just say you now. I'm just gonna take care of this myself.

That's how he listened. He is he's. Extra extra innocent. Don't call it a fuck This trial with prejudice, because that is prejudice- and that's basically gonna screw this young man from the rest of his life. He can have this. in over him, and so that's my only problem with the jurors. But let me back the jurors completely the jurors have the option because they are Americans living in a free country. To put their own safety above the benefits to the defendant, and while I hate it, I hate it that in that position they have an absolute right to put their own safety above the defendant, agree or disagree. They have the complete right without any criticism. They will not be criticized for this to put their own safety above. The defendant is not their job.

it's not our job. To protect this guy he's a stranger is sad but true, I see someone, we disagree and I respect that so the those who disagree, I think those euros should just young man upper woman up wherever they are. and give us a earth and take the risk where you come from my locker, reject that. But my personal preference is that those people have their absolute freedom to protect themselves and that the courses them is less important than that as important as it is protected in the course of them. I think really important, as I've said the courses and is that the jewel in the republic, if you'd of course system the rest doesn't matter. You got off Injurie. Yes, I did get off jury, but I also served on a couple of injuries

when I was a little less famous but still famous enough, but people than recognize me by by my face. I did serve on a couple injuries and I recommended by the way If you ve never served at a jury, I think that your Missy out, because as an experience that binds you to the country in a way that I've never never felt, I suppose, if you join the military, you feel maybe psychologically bound to the, like an extra way seems reasonable, but doing jury duty. Just just the fact that your serving you're citizen duty, and seeing how the whole thing works like actually yo breathing it then and feeling it and being part of it, gives you a really different feeling about the whole thing. and the thing that I like best is the seriousness with which every person took the process

Everybody from the spectators to the judges to the defendants, everybody we're buying into a system that they respected, even if they wanted him to get out of jury service. Of course you don't people need to take care. So still, but you knew get a new respect for this house and you see everybody else respecting it to including, I think, even the defendant. So I have a lot of respect for the legal system works in all, while joy red is going full racist, of course, talking about something called there's a thing for white male tears as soon as they get caught. They bring the water, works, so this is more of the wage fragility and white people or defective races, bullshit joy, read your racist can't and I think you should be disrespected everywhere. You go.

So I don't think I'm not really willing to defend this anymore in terms of free speech and opinion when stuff is just flat out just flat out Racist Missus Collingwood is joy red racist. I told you yesterday that that I've been challenged about c and then reach, and I said, if you think the Syrians ratings ratings on tv has anything to do with rage, you, are mistaken. There reaches the website see that model. As I understand it, this is my interpretation of it is that they create content online tv and that sort of just marketing for the website. It creates content and its the marketing for the website. The website is where the the money, if there's any money there, but here's some numbers they have by far the most

Is it a new site by far and even the Fox NEWS is way beyond so they website three hundred and seventy nine million monthly visits? That's not people, that's that's visits, but still lot Emerson, yes, three hundred and twenty nine so that up in that category, but not quite the Fox NEWS is two hundred sixty six million, so Fox NEWS is quite a laggard on the website. Now correct me. If I'm wrong, I'm wrong about that. a month Kizil it by here is a here's. A a thing the CNN is spreading with their three hundred seventy nine million monthly visits. there's a clip of one of their pundits, Bikari sellers and easy essay. Fifteen second clip talking about Rittenhouse.

In fifteen seconds, but carry sellers told for lies about the trial by lie. I don't need another, he knew the truth. So, let's just say, is inaccurate. Does he get rid of mind right? We don't know his intention But but the facts are fairly clearly had you said four things about it in fifteen seconds and all of them are untrue. Now, why do you think a pungent? Foreseeing then has four mistaken impressions in I don't know how many more he has, but Four of them in this many seconds- and I think the answer is it: he watches the news on the left, presumably. So basically, the victim of fake news, so I guess fake news they put him on tv to spread the fake news that he got from his own fake news.

So he's not really making news is repeating the fake news which they can treat as making news and make a clip out of it. So it's like circular fake news engine they ve got billiard pray present I hear some faint news about bill gates, but this is, this is a double fake. The news is vague and sows. The fact check this adult as a double fake news. You all believe this. Unless you really yourself. I gotta tell you something so jawdropping, maybe not in today's world. But you're gonna have to really yourself because you're not gonna, think I'm interpreted correctly until you see yourself you'll think I'm making this up So writers, as a fact check on bill gates and they they set up this way. They say in a recent interview. The circle Social media there gave said.

Vaccines quote only slightly reduced the transmissions. That became viral because it sounded like you were saying: the vaccines don't work, but this is fact checked as a false, because it's out of context alright, so so watch the watch the trick. So you got to pay attention carefully or you missed the trick. What's a good track because you have to pay attention carefully and people do so what gave said- and this part is not dispute? You said that exhalations only slightly reduced the transmissions. Now that was fact checked, as is basically not false. But here's how they factor there. It is true that current cove and vaccines do not halt the transmission of the virus. Ok was

again talking about vaccines, halting or not altering the virus? Not really I mean he says it only slightly reduces the transmission, so he thought it so he agreed that vaccines do not halt the transmission so so far the factors degrees they both that doesn't stop transmission and now here's the punchline and though the fact check summary they say Roy. This is Reuters, However, they are highly effective at preventing severe disease. Wait a minute. That's not the topic. The south, the topic bill Gates, said nothing about severe disease. You talked about transmission and to support bill gates instead of vacuum, say: oh yes, true what he said or

this false, they actually changed the topic for the thought. At the end, they changed from reducing transmission to preventing severe disease and then they fact check the preventing spheres disease. But what the hell. If you didn't read the whole article, you wouldn't know that they didn't fact check they. They made up something to fact Jack and then the fact tat. The thing they just made up unbelievable, why are you of all the faint news, fake crap sake, fact checking of seed, this will just like really stands out as not even trying now You got a political fact. He told me this bullet effect, lean, left or right, political, political factor. They lean right or left you say left, I'm sure. That's right, you all think left. Ok, maybe.

Those are just because you think all factors lean left out of this. That some in this am sceptical that they left, but maybe they do, but there Jack says that it is actually a person is significantly less likely to pass the corona bars so, in other words, political blood effect. As saying that Bill gates was wrong. This fact so Bill Gates says it only slightly reduces the transmissions, but political fact says the opposite. That is greatly reduces transmission, so who's gonna blow. Are you gonna believe writers, the failed to say he was wrong or a political act that did say he was wrong. She's got to fact checks, but their different. So

Do we need a fact checker for the fact checkers? I feel like the fact checkers themselves need some kind of a rating, but then that would just put a fact, checker above the fact checker and then who checks that person's fax and what kind of really flying blind here. I think political fact was the one who got to find people hoax right. Think it was the other factors got it wrong, but I'm not pause about that either. Well, representative, Corey Bush tweeted, something that is something never happened. She says quote when we marched in Ferguson. way. Supremacists would hide behind a hill near where Michael Brown Junior was murdered and shoot at us. They never faced consequences, and then she says about Kyle Rittenhouse, except that none of this ever happened

None of it. I just completely made up way. Supremacists shooting at them, who makes out up Makes up a white supremacist were shooting others well, Corey Bush did Do you think she will lose your job over that now. so Corey bushes, sort of the Alex Jones of the left in this case. There is one step. the news, and I'm not gonna, tell you which one, but this is just context. Says one story in the news, and maybe when I talked about it, maybe one I have imagined I'm just gonna say that one of the major stories in the news is totally wrong. Well it totally wrong in the sense that the context is completely missing and they did they don't know the context, but I do

So there's one of the stories were, I know some context. They will completely change what you thought about the story, but as in many cases I can't tell you how I know it so. Well, just one story that I happen to know the background that apparently the news industry doesn't know so. Stone to judges Congress right itself: What do you think's going happened with Rittenhouse. Oh then, why say anything the reason. I tell you that I know things that are not. The news is part of the context is to tell you how fake the news is. As part of the gale man, amnesia concept that is they ve knows something about topic. They know it's fake news, but if you're not an expert in the topic, you can't tell your guy sprawly too

what's funny that all the ones that I know about her fate, but Susan Don't just give you another example that tourism. Did your story that literally maybe only a handful of people in the world, knowest fake. I just happened to be one. Right now, so what do you think will happen with renounce. How much rioting do you think will happen because I feel like the left might know that this is too, for what do you think I'm gonna go with very little. That's going to be my tech, I think it'll be mostly pundits Talkin about it and lying about it, like you know like like. What's his name, Bakari sellers, Just abundance will lie about it. I think that the five hundred.

National guard threat will be enough, and I also think that the rioters don't wanna make Rittenhouse looked right. If there's rioting, Rittenhouse looks more innocent No, I mean the context of riding with simply make his action seem more justified in another saying I'm just to find them. I'm saying that persuasion wiser would look more just what so, I think the left would be smart enough release the organizers, I dont, think any organizers would be done enough to organise around this, because I think they know this would be too far. Just too much of a bullshit anything today, and I think they can use the excuse that their zeal five hundred National guard there. Now I do think there will be a smattering of just people independently, saying hey, I think I'll go.

learn complain, but I dont know there will be organised by any by smart. Not the way be Elam is organised, not the way at Tita. Just because I do have some kind of leadership this used to be you really smart enough to know winter went to play and went to hold them. I guess they left. such granite. While we are thus how we can find no now I've told you, since the beginning of my political commentary, that the Only credibility usually give me. is what I earned through production, and everything else is just entertainment and if I can predict better than other people, Then you should give me a little more weight than people were better protection and that's all less deserve that's the best. I could do.

So that's my prediction that the the organizers of rights will be too smart to organise this one whatever happens, will be in an organised and smallish, maybe opportunistic and spend it. How does follow the money applied to the jury? Verdict there. There's no motive is stronger than fear, so fear beats money. Maybe it's the only thing I can think of anything else. Give you a thing fear these money there may be. Some identity suffer, does, but not as much lust and sex This money, maybe does Biden while riots. I don't think so. I think rights would be bad for one

I'm saying seventy on local saying that I live in the California bubble so gives the left far more credit deserves. Nobody deserves credit. Nobody deserves anything, but I would look, but if you have specific example there be great now if you say that gives the left more credit that they deserve. I feel like that's exactly where am aiming for, if you're, detecting I'm giving them more credit than they deserve, exactly what I'm shooting for, because it's the only way I can be credible when I disagree with them, is by starting with giving them more credit than they deserve.

so I guess I guess I would accept that. Criticism is true, but I think you're wrong. There is a negative is, is intentional sorrows I think, Who knows how much Soros is behind anything? I'm not one of these horrors dispersed people people but is certainly true that he don't it's two causes that you may remain alike. Exactly somebody wisely saying on Youtube that if

If you get land other target exactly you have to decide whether you than overshoot or understood, and when I'm giving credit left, I would prefer to overshoot and gives them more credit strategically is wildness, just mass hysteria jammed up by left media. I think this is a power play and that's the only way, I see it, there are a lot of these things. You know we we catch them in terms of was fair and good and who can get away with what.

but suddenly things like abortion, gay rights, lots of stuff is just a power, has nothing to do with was right or wrong. If it's the people who believe that their oppressed power than they change legs, so you see, suffers as power dynamics and nothing else woke is boundary seeking behaviour infantilism. That is an interesting intellectual comment which I have to think about feel like that. Wasn't have to think about that sounded: smart, blind spot Scott was my blind spot. So that's the kind of comment that,

just doesn't help. Now I've told you before that is more exciting to be wrong, then right designed by also that feeling it out. If it's about money, don't wanna be wrong or health listlessly, two categories of money or health. You don't wanna, be wrong if it's gonna question on your Cassio, but isn't it more exciting to find out you wrong about something you thought was true: all your life. I find that exhilarating because, when you find out you're wrong about something you solve is true all your life. You just got smarter now only about that thing, but about how easily you can be duped, this kind of important or marriage. So how many of you think a change in the topics? I saw a comedy. How many you think that,

China is in for a big economic reckoning for any variety reasons: they ve got a bubble, they they closed the border. Yet I feel like China's got a big echo. a bubble and hearsay. Does this not barking concern. Will you tell me what progress there has been for by Americans meeting specifically about creating manufacturing plants in United States? Can anybody tell

if anything happened where an here's the way, I look at how many would say, manufacturing operations moved into China before the pandemic and how many american manufacturing jobs have gone to China since the bend them. What do you think? I feel like the number of companies going into China Mimi zero, but I would love to know what it was before the pendant was it was it a hundred a month and what was the number, because a lot of would be smaller the three big ones a month? They could really be important. You just don't know. What do you think that story is lacking in any kind of coverage? I would say that maybe the biggest security thing that's going is how much we can pour manufacturing and China

And our supply chains, so if we don't have any reporting on whether world peace, blowing down or China business? What are we now if you. now, if we're slowing down are sending manufacturing to China and reversing. Ideally, if you don't know that we don't know anything, because everything depends on that, really just everything. Ah, yes, if we don't know, it is not being managed. That is great. China is number slavery, yet you'd have community to invest in China. At this point I actually saw an article recently in a major publication, arguing that investing in the chinese stock market might be a good deal right now does its is press at the moment to which I said why.

All American would write the Oracle because I think it was written by an American. Why? Americans, rice in article is as investing in China seems like you might be a good risk groups, at the moment, the cells I somebody paid by China? Doesn't it omitted deathly, doesn't serves only something American would right. I have already seen articles like that. You are right. That is all I have heard today. Go do some other things. One way is just a foreign intelligence operation. You you know I invested in. I think I told you this. When, while I was having his problems invested in Ericsson, Kazakhstan is a competitor for the telecom

and I thought that was a no brain. I thought that investing in waterways competition will just be the easiest investment of all, because waterway will be prevented from competing in Europe. some would not be. There are many competitors, origin, which is make a ton of money, but it went down what might by arcs investment just like one down what was happening now. Don't have visibility that the industry at the moment, so it was a dumb investment- is more of a political investment than that

Investment investment. But how can I return life? Is the verdict comes down today? I will consider that, but it depends where I am and worm doing. I get a big data to invest in nuclear is no clear, the other relevant everyone who says you like you.

So it's always say look into the concentration of lottery winners in sandy hook. I shall give you enough to learn how wrong you are about the situation. Now. I don't think you know me, though I don't think the number of lottery winners in said the work is going to convince me if anything, but I don't think so. I think I'm gonna go slow news today until the renounce verdict- oh Ericsson, whisky to China, solutions interesting I'll talk to you again tomorrow, maybe today.