Good morning, everybody and congratulations. First thing you did today or one of the first things is hugely successful. You found your way to align version of, or maybe recorded of, coffee was got atoms, which is the here. That's right. The best thing that ever happened in the entire history of the universe now on Youtube today. If you have any audio problem justly I heard the were audio problems, but can you tell me the India in the comments wall, I pray you for another, highlight its a highlight. Its called simultaneous happen? All you need is a copper mugger glass, a tanker jails,

by the Canton charge of Alaska vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee and join me now for the unparallel pleasure, the dopamine here the day. The thing makes everything better You know it does scale. The simultaneous happened out is now go. Ok looks like most of you did not have audio problems, but they were problems in some places like us, defence are so in fun, news will get to the serious stuff, but in fact. whose Tesla has given us. Some beta users now know they're not being pails just users in users. Where they get on full self driving, obey the software.

and so there are some people in Brooklyn who can actually take their hands off the wheel, which would be unwise, is apparently curly. The self driving part is not as self driving as possibly but here is my take on self driving cars. I think the highways need to be designed for them alone. What do you think do you think? Will they think it's can be practical to have regular occurs in all kinds of stuff happening at the same time as self driving cars? I just don't know if far or human driving capabilities in terms of anticipating the kid running across the road because he has lost his ball. I mean a human can pick up trouble before

a machine right, but the machine might react faster or even see some things that the humans don't say. You're the things that I would want for self driving cars number one I'd want the roads, especially designed, so it's only self driving cars. I don't know how it got there, but that be cool. I would like all the self driving cars to be networked together. That's not yet a thing right, but I think that no matter the make up of the car it needs to be network specifically, so the other cars can tell us it lost control, does if one of the cars loose controls, control or- let's say, let's say all the cars or monitoring each other worry Just all the colors of a body like every car is monitoring itself, plus one other car. If the other car does something there, some other car would not have done. It should set down an alert right

the car, acting in a way that I certainly wouldn't have acted as a self driving car and then maybe something kinda remediate. Doesn't vision, but the other thing I like to see is some kind of a satellite visibility. Above the cars now could be cameras in the street lights could be some of the long mosques own low satellites. They could see your carpet easily, but don't you think you'd like to know if there's a car around the corner, Because if you, if you had all the cars now, you probably I sold on the idea of mixing it probably now slowly. The idea of having only self driving time road, but you realize you could get rid of ST lights right, like all street lies, will go away because If you add visibility from above and all the cars were network, you did

two ways to know. If a car is coming from a hidden direction, you all The cars could actually go through an intersection without stopping I'm would slow down some would speed up, but there's always be plenty room that you just there. These self driving cars were just regulate and you never have to stop so you can drive twenty the overseer twenty percent slower get. There are fifty percent faster. if you had a softer, did you do your own research on this? Now I mean not just sort of thinking about it and saying obvious things girly Tesla made a billion dollars profit. Was it this year or this quarter or quarter just as quarter? That's amazing, but a quarter of their profits was from Bitcoin sales. Is there anything that you love me

Do me a quarter of a million dollars and Bitcoin this quarter come on That's just showing off. I'm is bad enough. You don't you do the most successful electric car company that felt a little like showing off, but if you had like Bitcoin as a as a sweetener on top of that, you just kill it. That's just showing off right? Bernie Sanders doesn't like our billionaires having a space raised by themselves. Bernie so no longer relevant. What kind of space what we have at all, if the billionaires there's we're doing it, I think something like nothing right. That's what it would look like. Course we need them. I hears the faint news today, faint news. I think this is more of the fog of war, fake news, which is a little different than regular, fake news.

The fog of warfare, news people are probably trying to get it right and just getting a wrong, whereas when the story is aged a little bit, anything this wrong is probably intentional. You know if you oughta be, but in the fog of war, can be just a mistake in here The things we ve heard about Rittenhouse ensures we ve heard that There were two rogue jurors that Didn't want you didn't want to rule because our afraid, but I think that spend debunked as in that now we hear that there might be a six six split. All of these are unconvincing. low reliability reports. I doubt it do you think it's possible could be sixty six and I hate to say it, but it may have to do with the the racial make up of the jury if the racial make up the jury is halfway.

Other? Maybe because I don't think anybody is gonna, be looking at facts this is a trial, becomes political. I think people just line up on their team. You hope that doesn't happen in America, but I feel like it could how I'm going to say I doubt very much the six EC split. I hypothesis, ethics. Butter, apparently or some kind of possibly afford person. That's not confirmed, who might be a hold down for guilty. It may be trying to your retry the case Luxury room, but again we don't know any of this for sure. so I would say that everything you hear about the jurors, the jurors and the deliberations. Put a put a really big skeptical pin in any of those stories someday. We might know what they did, but we don't know now. Are we just guessing

Rasmussen reports that the public expects women to worsen and the future thirty seven percent think it'll be worse, unemployment and twenty seven percent say it won't be as bad. Here's a funny thing exactly twenty five percent think unemployment will be about the same next year. Here is the only way I know for sure you won't be about to say if you want to make a prediction about anything,

predict it's gonna, be about to say there are that many things to say about the same. I suppose it be obvious which ones they are so there wouldn't be much of reproducing, but that twenty five percent, if you knew the, if you knew this lifestyle, I always make fun of any pole. There has twenty five percent where anything near that number is that's exactly the number of people in the United States who get every question wrong. Does it better what the question is? Twenty five percent of the public will reliably just wrong and it shows up at every level. I ain't one of the most frequent criticisms that I receive. Is I never admit what I'm wrong? How many of you would buy into that in the comments to tell me if you think, that's a real

the ball. Characterisation of my was a long term. Public persona now locals ear your friendlier to me because these that's a subscription service up almost areas, a grin, ok, I thought you have to defend myself would apparently I dont. However, I do want to talk about something I got wrong now, if you think about people who admit when they get things wrong. Who do you think of it begin Gimme some names beside me

Gimme the names of people either you ve seen admit there were wrong, I'm besides yourself. Ok, now I'm talking about public figures, public figures who talk about the news sort of it, though, MAR bungee, no talker Karlsson, O Reilly, maybe Jack Disobey filled. Ok, I thought talker Tucker's of us I came to mind me because it always seems strange when somebody says directly. I was wrong because, usually Well, I was wrong is used to see them, doing the wrong s play well

were wrong about the fake steel dossier, because you know, after all, the Trump campaign did show interest in Russia, helping them so use That kind of, whereas, whereas when talker, get something wrong, he just as this was totally wrong and then the goes on like. I always respect that, so I'm try to try to be the good version of admitting you're wrong, where you say it clearly, what I'm gonna a little bit of cash to me, I get into that are either goes like, Do you remember when suddenly Powell was saying they were going to release the cracking? Somebody remind me today that I was confident that the crack it was real, that there would actually be a crack and will be some kind of really big,

now. I was on unambiguously totally wrong. which has nothing to do with whether or not there is a problem with the election. I'm saying that, sadly, bellowed did not produce a crack and I can therefore she would and here's what I got wrong specifically, I thought that there's no way a lawyer operating at that level. Would be so easily bamboozle by bullshit. boy was I wrong now carried her mind. So am making an unfair assumption about her thinking. Right is always unfair. When you try to imagine you know what I thinking low associate associate the high Scott,

So, yes, I understand that there are still some litigation blah blah blah. but would you all agree with me that she has not produced a Kraken and I thought she would, So I am unambiguously wrong about that when you say unambiguously now I do say and here's my ish part. I do Say that any system that can be hacked- and I think our election system is in the category of things- which I pathetically theoretically could be So whatever you have a situation like that in the stakes are high and lots of people involved, it will be hacked. We just don't know if it's already happened so my take. Is that a crack and is guaranteed

but no way to know that happened already or as in the future, but is guaranteed because the situation guarantees it just my take, while Donna. alright Biden's. Getting is a health exam today, I wondered if he's gonna get a cognitive test, but then I heard he's gonna be under Anastasia, and you'll get a call and ask a b. Joel Pollak pointed out in the fact they are looking for his brave they're just going about it a different way than I would have thought. Maybe they know something we don't so they'll be looking for his brain, but they'll be looking for it by checking through his ass or witches. that's a good first place to look, but, interestingly, during his anesthesiology and during his anastasia, a word I hate to spell, and I hate to pronounce even more

calm. Harris will be the official president of the United States. Now. remember when I was telling you how I was totally wrong about that crack and like old The way I was also one of the first public figures to save the election is done. We just have to move on, so I think I was right on that. long run, because even if you find something Scooby too late, so it's not that you are not going to find anything, it's just too late systems moved away. Harris is gonna, be president for awhile, and this will give us a unique situation. Number one.

I remember in August of twenty eighteen sitting in the oval office and Trump Espy, who do, I think, will run against them, and I said I thought his biggest risk was calmly. Harris today should be present in the United States. Now keep in mind that I prefer that I predicted Cobbler Harris would be the main competitor when she had her ratings were like zero for popularity, and I continued saying it after she dropped out of the race. I predicted that she was still figures threat after she dropped the race to day she's, president of the United States. Now I didn't see out and in that way but I don't know anybody also was was thinking. Gi gather, shouted the oval office and there she is, but

Is a weird situation she's pulling a twenty eight percent approval? Can somebody do me a quick fact check on Congress's approval at the moment, any other major polls is it round some of the teams right between ten to thirteen percent subway saying so so we got a president president, twenty eight percent Congress at thirteen percent. Worse, I guess it spends Walpole nine percent towards some say. Twenty two percent Harris's approval approval. Anyway, we have the lowest of government in the history of the United States. I think I mean. Maybe the civil war was worse, but in modern times as in this, the lowest rating we ve ever had for a government. I think this trump would be roughly double that right. Harris has roughly half of the approval of Trump would have

just walked in and ran for office. Interesting Lee Harris's communications director resigned now I have some respect for the communications director for the resignation, because very clearly, the communication director, assuming that that person has some talent, could not have had any on her right because we saw the worst communicating with I've ever seen. I've never seen anybody who is this bad public speaking at anybody ever anybody, certainly with people in the public domain, as our communications director quits now have you tried to read of ever tried to read Harris Tweet. I don't have the communications director was directly in charge of the two.

But I just want to open up any Harris tweet. I haven't looked at this, but I'm just going on my owner memory of things Just watch our boring this is this is a cardinal Harris tweed from thirteen hours ago today I met with President Lopez, Ober Obregon of Mexico in my ceremonial office, our administer, is engaged in ongoing discussions with Mexico. We just the steps we are taken to address the root causes of

of migration. In addition to water, sharing and space, is that the most generic tweet you ve ever heard in your life? The herd tweets are lifeless there, absolutely lifeless. Now I get this is vice president right. It's not like pants was the tweeting champion of the world. Writhing vice presidents need to be a little bit boring, but you could,

a little less boarding. Couldn't you I mean this days boring to a new level. So if you look at limit, let me take some counter examples. Take a TED crews. Does TED crews understand Twitter yea? Does I'm not sure I always did? If you looked at the early ten crews tweets, were they all provocative and interesting? Probably not, but do you think TAT crews learned was social media is all about and had had a move the energy and had to be interesting and draws yeah tell cruises where the best twitters out there. you can nuclear them for politics, that's a different question, but his tweeting and communication are extraordinary, really good. So I think you see a lot of twitters who learned from Trump that at least a little bit of provocation helps your communication Harris not so much.

Well, here's a more probably fake news, I'm gonna call it that you know the story about the Rittenhouse Joe. hers, were allegedly followed by somebody allegedly orator, NBC. And then Rittenhouse Judge decided to kick MSNBC and of the end of the core out, so they can't be there in attendance any more for the livestock here's. The question I don't know of any of this was true: cause is still the fog of war state. right now. Apparently the and the alleged NBC, employ your honour, our fears, employer contractor or what but claims. He had no intention of filming thou, more or whatever, but nobody believes that he's freelance, so he says he's feeling

but apparently minor banana Simon. We don't know that, so I would say the most. You should be skeptical of every part of that story am assemblies Agnes. That happened, but both the part, I admit, is that they send somebody on an assignment or were somebody was and Simon for them. Did it I would would wait to see what we know about this possible. The assignment would tell us exactly what the assignment was would tell us what he was up to. Maybe I'm going to stay open minded by my first reaction to it is the same as yours, which is horror or you know, that I've said that our court system, with all of its problems, I mean nothing- is perfect right records system as all kinds of flaws.

but it is also the crown jewel of the republic and if we lost the court system, everything else falls apart. Would you agree if you lose the courts? Is there if they're, not credible, everything else falls apart And here we have a major news organization who, allegedly associated with our own intelligence agencies The people who know more about this than I do claim their NBC is basically just an organ for the CIA. You further right and there's plenty of evidence for it. the evidence is overwhelming. I is just that I dont personally make their claim, because I mean I don't know, but smart people say is true and there's plenty of evidence for

This would mean that our own country tried to destroy the republic by taking out the the most vulnerable part of the most important part of our entire structure, so that the most important part of our republic is the court system, and then it was the most important part of the court system. Jury of your peers that keeps the whole the country together, let me say it again: jury of your peers is where all credibility comes from. The entire fucking republic depends on you take that one thing away in awful sport. Almost everything else. You can your paper over a fix. You see how terrible congresses, but somehow some bill still get past right. But if you take out the the peer the trial by your peers, you take that out.

the whole thing, full support and NBC. Just one after that. Just went after the most vulnerable part of the republic. Maybe I will wait to hear what they say if they say something that was maybe they're organism to a story like something about how the The jurors live in a generic way. Maybe the story was gonna, be there. Jurors, RNA nondescript. hotel and some like that. I'm willing to listen to their side of it. but on the surface it looks like they tried to take out the republic accidentally alone intentionally. I can't read their minds I guess I can't put intention in there, but how they Would you not know this would destroy the republic? How would you not know that so

I am more fake news: so, then, is still writing that the dossier wasn't totally debunked, because we do know that from campaign really did while russian help, and they write, with a link to support their their assertion. That, Trump campaign really did want that russian help. Now, if you don't, click on the link, is a new site right if a new site, tells you in that news article not an opinion article, but a news article. they tell you that that the Trump campaign wanted russian help you'd believe it when you would you click on the link to see what they meant it as they are example of that why I clicked on the link cuz, I It was bullshit here the two things that they still they still say, are the true

campaign asking for russian help. There was one Don Junior endured, took a meeting in the Trump building about maybe some Hilary Dirt cuban minded. but they knew and all they had to do. His walk downstairs to hear it. That's that that was the entire effort. If you just walk down stairs, we might tell you something important that might come from Russia who doesn't take that meeting seriously. Who doesn't that meeting? I would- and I would go further and say if you didn't take that many you'd be in any it does what it was Worse, they could happen nothing. I guess turned into an international thing, but here's how I would have played it and have said this before first find out what they have to say, though she needed to bring the F B. I am or somebody else than you do it

But why would you bring the FBI and before you know, if there was anything there, because this What are you know and sure enough? Nothing was there. It was actually a beaten sweatshop, wasn't any Hilary dirt at all. So if you have any business experience whatsoever, Number one you say to yourself: this is probably not what they say. It is right. often negro meeting in your surprised, it's pretty common so Firstly, you do if you your business, savvy essay, you know if they have everything from anybody, but this is a The virus is just downstairs and is just five minutes, because we can leave when we want to see what that say: thou be a reasonable business thing to do now, support that you got actual dirt. You know it came from Russia. What do you do then? Well, you know the dirt. So now is useful to you, which is cool

and then he also do the right thing. You turn it over the F B. I say we got some stuff, this is cool, but I'm glad we know it because it's true, you probably needed another source. You wouldn't want to trust the Russians, but if the Russians told you something you could check out, what do you want? I was so bad, but see then just by law calling it the way they do. And now you won't check the details. They don't know that if you check that you would find experienced, businesspeople, Jared and Don Junior very experienced business people doing exactly what experience but these people would do in this situation. They did exactly what I would do a take the meeting, because it was easy. Abs and pay off, maybe a dozen. Maybe I need to get the F b I involved. Maybe I don't but at least find out what's going on before I better decisions,

And then the other thing was Trump: make Use Jochen public, some debate, Russia, if you have those emails. and and CNN's trying to play that off. As always, you always pretend like it's a joke, but I thought it was obviously a joke. Now that doesn't mean he didn't want it. Why? Wouldn't you want that? And what's wrong with that? What's wrong with wanting some real information, you know you didn't ask for bulshit. What's it what's wrong with finding out stuff, even if you get out from another or the wrong source. Is there something wrong with the information now? Obviously, you dont want Russia hacking, anybody, United States, but that's that that part seem like the joke. I've told you that the energy, at least in my life and I feel like the country

Is really want right now, some of you feel it right. There's something about the world the fields I sometimes get away to happen. I dont office. Just politics, I don't think it's a war I don't feel that all does anybody. I don't feel a civil war. I don't feel a nuclear war. I don't feel war at all, I mean maybe low level conflict somewhere, but I don't think that's what's happened. It feels different. but I tweeted today and I'm gonna go through. My tweet does, I think, is worth it just what I think might be going on, and I think it's a an awareness shift. I think the world goes through various levels of awareness shifts as we move from primitive, too

more civilised, and we learn more alone. We just run through a few these things they have changed just in recent years now you might disagree with some of them, but but we hear them in their totality before you disapprove Specifically, I would say that what's changed recently, just last few years, Everyone understands their own news is fake. You used to think the fake news was only on the other side right right, Now you know on both sides. You know that you have. You have also been fooled by your own new sources. Now, in my opinion,. The left is a little more accurate on the news, but there is still plenty of criticism to go around outside. So, if you take the cracking, the crack is a perfect example that was that was fake news on the left,

on the right. So I think we now understand that our own new sources can be wrong just as easily as the other teams and that's different. How about our awareness about China? I think Trump did that for us by the way, I think Trump is the reason we understand. Fake news is fake news. I think he did that, which is what I predicted he would. Change how we saw reality. Our awareness about China has completely changed completely, and China is the biggest thing in the world and if your impression of the biggest thing in the world changes, you're gonna feel it. big deal. You remember it was only a few years ago. Nuclear energy was bad and now it's the green solution that will save the world. What that's a big difference? Yeah I'm at each of these have they have the the quality

there are awareness is higher is not just our information, this different. It's our awareness of how we ve been fool. This different. Because the nuclear energy thing was always unawareness problem. People believed it was worse than it is, and now they ve been correct. so they can understand how they can be so wrong and and then be wrong for a long time about the fact that the government is probably on the verge of becoming full republican couple years. That's something pretty big because it looks like the Democrats are just shitting the bed so badly every day they couldn't possibly what Congress and- and I doubt that the presidency- so I mean I could be wrong about that neck unchanged three times before any of these elections, but at the moment it feels like that there may be part of the energy shift,

I think the country has realised that the whole wokeness and credit grace theory things weren't overreach. We feel like we wish to limit the fields Like does when he reached the limit, your energy is different because when people, just nudging, you a little body like all right. I got better things to do no that one I'm not going to die on that hill, I don't like that, but I got other things to do and then he hit the wall and I think I think, a lot of people the wall and then that changes your energy are all right. We have now reached the point where I will. I will take this to the under the earth, Before I was flexible, but now you have reached my limit, that's my limit and now what happens to my energy? My energy just goes nuclear cause reached my limit. Some of that might be happening.

We used to think it official data from the government and from big companies was probably Mostly honest and sufficiently accurate, even if as some problems do you believe that anymore. I think now. We believe that all data is fake, because it mostly is now, maybe not in joy but others, always some contacts left out or something. We are now more likely to think that all data is vague as the default assumption, whereas it used to be the opposite just a few years ago. A few years. Well, even one year ago, a lot of people, said smart people would have said that second amendment doesnt protect you from your government. Does the government has a better guns? Do you believe that now today does anybody believe that govern the guns are not the only thing keeping us from being lost?

I think Australia gave you all their learning. You needed on that, yeah that the locked on the Australia is experiencing. That can happen here in Amerika because of the second amendment. I just don't think it can happen about, we used to believe that humans make decisions based on facts and reason. Now I didn't believe that, but many of you did do you believe it anymore. Now people are now the words cognitive, dissonance and confirmation by us all I'm a knowledge. They were not common knowledge. Five years ago there were things as some nerves. Like me, talked about but is now common knowledge to understand that we don't make decisions based on facts and reason we used to think those jack reality, but now I think we can see that were watching our own movies. Would you agree,

we used to think I'm saying the clear movie and those other people are just being done, but now you realize some of those other people dont have low. I they're just watch an indifferent movie. You can't tell which ones right- that's different that's different about we used to be If you saw them, video is true, then there was a people hoax edited Video, Covington, kids, hoax, edited video drinking bleach hoax, video and now what happens when you see a video. You automatically believe- or at least the skeptical part of your brain is automatically fired up like a well, We will see the rustle of area. Listless some context, so we won from vat.

Doesn't lie to video lies more than anything. Am I right? That's just in the last few years that we completely shifted on what video is. and then, of course, the Russia collusion Hoax taught Us there is no limit to government corruption. honestly thought there was a limit. So here is another case where I'm gonna Madame wrong, when, when the people on the right were first talking about the Russia Collusion Oats being a Hillary Clinton paid operation with. The deep stay behind it and CIA was part of him and all that do you know what I thought. I thought There, certainly is something sketchy going out here, but it's not that bad. It's not like a pollute, between Intel agencies and Democrats, and it's not that when it was, it was every better that

the worst thing you could imagine that everybody would do to this country. They were doing. It is the worst thing that your government could have done to you and they were doing a hard, so my understanding of was how far my government would go to retain power and screw. The citizens is way different than was years ago now. I know, though, do anything. I didn't think that before and they'll tell any lie, because I can get away with it. I didn't think that I thought the no but it would lie in public if it was easy to fact check them wrong. Wrong. You can lie all you want public. Does you have your own factors? The left has there's the right. Has there see Goliar about anything now Stiffer I'm ITALY's is different and how I understand it,

So here is what I think is happening. This big energy shift is about people moving to another level of awareness. I think civilization just got a big promotion in terms of our understanding of the reality such a list and also the simulation theory when from crazy people too, maybe right five years ago, Workpeople serious about the simulation theory a few, but now I mean people every day who buy into the simulation theory as well as were the math suggests. Things are with us. The scout predicted right.

He used to think that voting mattered. I never thought that I never to another topic dj lad. Do you know how many of you know Dj Dj, lad of lad tv dot com, just wondering if there is like a complete lack of knowledge about him on the right? Some of you? Ok, if I only ask because I think his audience is mostly the left, mostly black America, but he also interviewed me when he was trying to figure out Trump, so it came to my house and for the benefit of his audience, interviewed me to explain why anybody would whatever

for job. So I have great respect for dj lad. You should follow him by the way great content. Anyway, he treated this. He said which Marvel Movie had the best script, not the best special facts, but the best script and I tweeted back. They have different stories I thought I thought all the Marvel movies were the same story. Am I wrong? There's something what happened to the world, and maybe maybe somebody's personal life was at risk. There was a very powerful villain and they had to fight the villain.

and towards the end of the movie. You would look like they weren't gonna win, but then they do in the end. Are you telling me that the Marvel movies have different scripts? It's the same script and and beyond that, as I've taught you, I think, in script, writing terms also they become. Blockbusters are the same pattern. They have to be, for whatever reason, people or by any other pattern- and this is the the script pattern that Marvel uses is the classic one the hero, the flawed hero, overcomes, are personal problems to save the world bubble David. Says going some attention for attending the National conservatism conference. and they use it. Use appalled by something these people reacting to it for years, they call my eye he talked about,

but you know how crazy all the conservatives were blah blah blah blah and how some of them were giving him a hard time when whose air, if they recognise them, But when he went to just socialize and have some dregs with em, you just had a great time because it turns out that when the the conservatives were off duty, as as you will just great people finding out with. any wrote it like yours, maybe a surprise or something but prize to me. Is it I mean the reason that my audience doesnt have exactly the same political opinions as I do is I just prefer you. Some of my opinions are closer to the left, but I have two men like spending time with them, their their largely unpleasant people, and I know this is a gross.

generalization relation the left, there's something they have sort of a personality disorder that I think is socially instilled, whereas the right does not The right is pretty much how they always were. I think other, if you, if you like the constitution- and you have a job you're good- right, I mean the right is very easy to please there's nothing easier than pleasing the right. I like the constitution, do you like the constitution? We're good? Do you work doesn't matter? Where do you work? If you work your cool, did you break any laws and anyone's I care about Now your goal wanna go to church with me and we are so easy to make a conservative happy live. There are very clear standards.

very easy to satisfy Obviously in the world, be harder to not make them happy. You'd have to work at it, but left candidate. All right, so, can you imagine being different topic imagine training all your life to be in the Olympics, which, by the way, I think, is stupid. from a risk reward perspective spending your life training for the Olympics. I think it's just stupid as a lifestyle Now, if you happen to be one of the few people make it and you get olympic metals and might open up some doors and those people certainly made the right choice, but everybody else if you dont metal or even if you metal third place, you wasted mostly your life. For copper, metal now magically, you did all that work and you

now that, when your turn comes you the right age and you finally qualified for limpets it's in China, you say you have to go, represent your country in China. Literally the country that just disappear their top ten a star because she complained that the government raped her. Now I dont mean with taxes I mean a member of the Communist Party, literally physically raped her, and when she talked about it. government disappeared and Europe you're an olympic athlete. You trained all your life, you can go over and support that system. How do

how do the female? How did the american gymnastic female team how they feel about that seriously? How, in fact, does the American Gymnastics women's to you who have been savaged with sexual abuse? Apparently, how did they go to China after this happened after China raped somebody in look. I mean the stories public, not the rape, but basically nor basically getting away with it in public. When you go well used you, you practice, all your life. You have too. So I. I'm not surprised that our athletes would go to China, but I dont respect them for it that fair

because I'm not required to respect anybody just cuz, they worked hard. I do like hard workers, But if you worked hard and then you decided to go support a rapist regime, I don't respect you at all at all, at least that decision. I don't respect. I am I respect you as a human, but not for that decision. I feel as though oh here's a interesting story that. Garnier, skeptical hat. When I give you this. Apparently there is a huge uptake in Google searches for the phrase suddenly died. And a lot of

Reporting of people who suddenly died in the headlines, somebody forty seven suddenly died suddenly died suddenly died. Now the question is asked is at a coincidence that coincidence, or is it vaccinations? What do you think put on your sceptical at come on I've? I've train you better than this. What do you think well, what would make Google searches go up for suddenly died. People are interested in the topic because the rumor is that people are dropping dead from vaccinations, which I dont have evidence of that. But so we, let me be clear. I dont have any evidence that people are dying from the vaccination. I also don't have any evidence that they're not.

Would you agree with that statement? We you and I don't have evidence that people are dropping down from the vaccinations more than normal, because we know every kind of drug kill somebody but we also don't know, is now happening. Is that a fair statement? We don't know it's happening, but we also done was not happening because we, it's just its opaque to us. and then a burly Pfizer's data. They're gonna wait fifty years to give it to you so that you can put a red flag on their well here's what I think. I think that you should expect. That would be a so. There would be an object in. Searching for suddenly died and an uptake and stories whether vaccines have anything to do with it or not. Does everybody,

that you should see. This is very predictable. You should see exactly this effect. The uptake of people being interested in those stories insertion for whether there is anything to it or not. Look exactly like this, so I'm not saying that it doesn't mean vaccines are doing it. I'm just saying you can't tell by this. This is this is as close to no information whatsoever as anything could possibly be, but could we could be vexed Unless you know people to which it happened now know that doesn't change it. Does. It is guaranteed that no matter what the vaccine was because all of vaccinations kill somebody, it was guaranteed that somebody would know them and we hear about

So there wasn't there's no way the somebody doesn't know somebody who died suddenly after vaccination, and we don't know if they died suddenly because of the vaccination, which is the second part of the right lots of people die ass everything. People die after eating those slice of bread they die suddenly, but not because they had a slice of bread. So just put the maximum scepticism. on this suddenly died thing, but don't rule out the possibility of the vaccinations are more dangerous than you think he can't rule it out. Based on anything, we ve heard are right that.

Is a liar I see wanna saying that a Florida lawsuit could finally unmask institution Knocker Motto the founder of Bitcoin obvious. They now I'm here to say that that can't be true. What do you think? Do you think that there is any lawsuit they could find the founder of Bitcoin, no matter what question they asked or who they're talking to? I don't think so. So I think this fake news, I'd like to be surprised, be interesting now. Actually I don't so Missus John Mcafee John Maxie would be allow richer if he were, if that were in.

A verdict today, I don't know, I don't think there will be a verdict unless it say on jury. What do you think I think you're giving you the Hungary. Here's some anecdotal evidence for: u yours. anecdotal evidence that doesn't agree with you here comes I live in the highly vaccinated northern California and highly vaccinated EAST Bay of Northern California, probably- and I'm just guessing just closely the nature of the people who live here and the Democrats fix in, and income and everything I don't know anybody who is now vaccinated with one exception can able say that.

I dont know another person adult or child. Actually I don't know anybody whose on vaccinated with one exception now, I also don't ask unless ever direct reason to write I sometimes ask because unconcerned about their risk, not my own, but are here's my in my entire social and family circle, I only know one persons whose on vaccinated- and that's the only person who got covered that I know personally now I say personally, I mean locally personally, not people. I know from twitter people I met once does that mean that the only person I know personally meaning locally and personally, who is on vaccinated, is the only personal goggles.

Now I also know people who spend time with their person didn't get uncovered. Did they died now mild, symptoms, miles and miles symptoms, because the person is not old enough. I dont think hasn't come morbidity that I'm aware of. So why should you take from that anecdote? Absolutely nothing. So if you

I was telling you that story, because it meant something you shouldn't write. It doesn't matter who says it is it's. An anecdotal report has no statistical, meaning whatsoever, and the moment you imagine it does. Well then you're missed. Let you know, I tell you the story, because it's sort of counter to what maybe some of you have heard anecdotally, doesn't mean anything. It's just my story. There's there's! No, no credibility that should be assigned to it other than event happened, but doesn't mean anything for this. Maybe, but neither does anything they are telling us that is gripped my mom gotta booster and died from septic shock. Is it a coincidence? I don't know.

I would tell you that, given that almost one, seventy five percent of adults, what's the number no seventy percent have then been vaccinated and most of us, this air, almost everybody who dies this year will die relatively close to when they got accident. You got that right. The almost everybody who dies from any cause will have recently been vaccinated, especially when you have two shots plus a booster now most people will then may be vaccinated a month ago, but there's a lot of people a lot of people diarrhoea Menu, we're going to be within days of getting vaccination, so what Does it mean that you know somebody who had that exact situation, nothing nothing at all, but Does it mean that is enough of Asia? Worn

Lesion look into it? Yes, yes, you should definitely be skeptical of any official data on this because of the anecdotes. There are enough to make you skeptical. There are not enough. tell you anything for sure are thus offer today I'll talk to you on Youtube later.