Oh goodness, what a day can you believe it? You showed up on time for those of you who live and amazingly those of you watching this unrecorded basis you're on time to his weird something about space time. I don't understand it either all I know is this is the best thing that ever happened to you is called coffee was got atoms because of the sky that sport plus the coffee And we're going to enjoy that right now. Would you like to take up a level anybody anybody, take it up a level? Yes, no. I feel the I feel the asses, and so all you need, is a government or glass and take your genocide against injure Glasgow vessel that occasionally with payment lip, and I like

and showed me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope winter. They think, makes everything better. It's called the subtlety surplus happens. Now some of you were ready, worry see you ve gotta be ready. Let this be a cautionary tale, those view or thinking. I've got plenty of time to poor my warm cup of coffee. Now you know always have talked you ve gotta be ready. Well, we ve got a great show today that was started off with your mansion, killing the bill back and better build. So vitamins bill, but better bill got blowing two parts to bits, that's right by news, but But I ve got one carpets and actually shelved, because Joe Mansion was a big no now here's the thing

How do you view this like what The way you interpret this situation? Well, Michael Shelling, burger have interesting take on which I agree with totally that it was progressive dogmatism that killed progressive dogmatism. Progressive dogmatism would be, the opposite of? What would that be the opposite of science, economics, rational, praying? tourism right- and I think that those accurate and specifically its accurate, because a lot of it was a clean energy related, and it was just the wrong analysis if it's the bill back better bill had include, let's say,

expansion of nuclear and natural gas, do you think that maybe they could have done the republican vote? Maybe not because it was still the inflationary, but they be alive. What was her because at least they be compatible with science if you're not even available with science, and here the power of the Party of Science. Now. Remember when I say a be compatible with eyes you're. The first saw you think he'd yourself as Scots gas, that they think they are, they think they're compatible besides. No, they don't know they don't, because even the debt. The crowds now understand that the only reason we are where we are risk, as we still have some nuclear we'd better get some more soon and that natural gas made a big difference in our honours

you're too. So anybody who actually looked at the data and looked at the science would not have put together a bill that looked this way. There would have been much more focus on the was, it are scientifically and economically demonstrated nuclear being chief among them, and so Here is a story. I see. I see that job mansion too. is party seriously. That was the problem. Joe mansion took his party seriously. It's the party, a science right. besides, I want to look at the science, the party of not being you know, all crazy, like the Republicans with all their conspiracy theories and whatever the Republicans are blamed of today, though, the party of being rational and empathetic you're, empathy and science? That would be the things that the report, the Democrats will tell you that there are all about.

so Joe Mansion apparently take calling their bluff. Said our. I was Those are our highest priorities: science and empathy using science to be the best we can for citizens while with that look like, and it doesn't look like the Milburgh better Bill and by the way, how do How do we do we avoid noticing that his last lasted mansion may somehow that's important in our simulated world. Somehow that should be a signal that, though, he's a character and apply away Goldman Sachs. lowered its growth gdp estimates in the stock markets taken they had, I think last I knew because, the market is interpreted. This is bad.

So in Goldman Sachs Stake, they said. Well, you know there won't be all this money going into the economy and then They talked about inflation. the only contact? They talked about inflation that because of inflation, it would be harder for this build back better bill to ever get assigned in the future. What's left out that, there's something sort of big left out right, the effect of inflation in the economy? This is Goldman Sachs. Did they forget, Now they didn't forget it. They talked about it in the wrong context. The only context they talked about it was in a political context, whether it be harder to pass a bill. I think you're supposed to include what that would do to the actual economy. If your goal is to talk. the economy, so yours Goldman Sachs. So

ITALY, signalling that are making a political decision and not not any kind of economic decision. There is an economic decision. Would look like this Out of stimulus to the system, that's on the positive side. On the negative side to be extra inflation added to the system, and we have looked at these two factors: we have decided that one of them is bigger than the other and therefore were in favour of or against that's what that's, what an honest analysis would look like. Did they do that now? They said there won't be as much growth true and that the inflation will affect the politics true, but you just left out the biggest factor. The inflationary effect on the actual economy like like it didn't matter.

Have you ever thought. The Goldman Sachs was an honest player that should talking out of it. So congratulations for Joe Mansion for calling the Democrats Bluff and actually being consistent with science and by the way, did matter that Joe Mansion got a education from Michael Shellin, burger in person about the economics of climate change. Yeah mattered uttered off had changed the decision, but that matters when it. What do you have a marketing the strongest persuade her in the country right now? That would be shall remember. The strongest persuade her in the country talked this person and he stopped the whole deal by himself. Stop the whole deal, I'm not by himself. He needed all the Republicans to be against the two.

the first case of Alma Kron Variant in the United States. That get me to some may say that the comments we must have known it was. You are right. I'm gonna give a little kudos to Joe Biden now, those of you who were not long time, listeners. I remind you of my technique. If you to criticise someone you should also protect yourself from confirmation, bias and cognitive dissonance by saying as many good things as you can about the subject of your criticism, because he began say anything about them. Well, I'm not gonna, take you seriously, so you're avenue say something good genuinely about Joe Biden.

He did something that was really clever and I called it out what he did it. In other words, I said: oh, this is gonna work out. This is clever and at work, here's what it was. There was a big call for packing the Supreme Court. Joe Biden to his credit, did not favour that belong to the lot of his party. Did so what you gonna? Do you dont favourite, and you have very strong opinion about it, but your party does need you got it. You ve gotta, make him happy. What do you do you put together a big hole? Commission and you have them study it cause? That's how you kill something because he knew. Of course, he knew that the commissioner would come back and not recommend back in the cork, knowing

that, of course you do that because all the old there, the nobody's gonna, recommended if there are serious academic and is so that's exactly what happened now they didn't recommend for or against recently laid out the the argument, but he got the same result. He basically send it to a committee to kill it I told you that on day one that's how you kill something you send it to the committee to take all the others. Because a lot of these things are about the people right. It's about trumpets, about Biden, it's about the personalities and Cavanaugh. But as soon as you take the personnel these out of it and give it to a committee, all the energy just drains out of it, and then once all the energy is gone, is just a bunch of academic say in how this would be a bad precedent because single person gets electorate selected, just repacked the court and therefore we wouldn't have. We wouldn't have a system anymore,

It would literally eliminate the system because you will have the checks and balances so good, move that this is a plus I dont know if I've seen a cleaner kill than were blinded with this core patchy idea. That was a clean kill. and you can see him set it up from day one. It was obviously a plan. Obviously I mean I'm not a mind reader, but you don't have to go too far into people's thinking to do this was an intentional play. It is such a standard play corporations. Do it all the time so good job. How many of you have listened to the no agenda episode up very popular podcast with Korea and Japan.

work and on observed fourteen own, I guess is new and they take me on how many of you have heard that there their criticisms of my opinions now the the take on this is that they destroy me. If you look at the comments, So let me guess you context little tell you out why this is fascinating. Now, it's not just fascinating, because it's about me mixed little more interesting for me, I guess, but here's what you need to know number one. I like these guys, current or echo, don't worry at four thousand years or something like a blot generally were very close to the sale opinion on all kinds of stuff.

Not everything, but generally, so I would say that they would be closer to my view of life. The lot of people in that's a compliment for anybody who agrees with you think you're smart. So this is important for the context. Remember these are not automatic binary people who are just against whatever I say. These are people were inclined to agree with me, because I have agreed with me enough in the past that they would not be biased against me Now they took on my opinions on Ivermectin vaccinations, And about the mass formation psychosis.

But I want you to listen to it I'll play just one little part of it. I don't want you to listen to it, so you can learn to spot cognitive dissonance. Now. The first question is: isn't me cuz, that's part of their claim is that the cognitive dissonance or the hypnosis is affecting me and that's why? I might don't make sense to them. So how would you know who is in cognitive, dissonance or not. gonna teach you this over and over again, because you have to see examples of it before you're good at it. The first thing to do is look for the tells here's one tell. The over laugh market An honest marking would be somebody just the laughing sales. This personally amused spree funny, But the overlap is this: guy. He says, acts, ah ha ha ha ha ha

ah ah Sir Liquor, Larry David, was comic. Laugh, So you'll see that tell in some of them again sure they have genuine laughs, but but it doesn't have sound genuine. When you hear it sounds like trying too hard that makes sense So listen for the trying too hard to. Lastly, is another till. marking my credentials specifically the credentials as a hypnotist. Without actually having a specific complaint about. Always a hypnotist ha ha well. I guess It gives bench of lab, but what does that have to do with? The argument is actually useful context, because a lot of people are new. Tele live stream right. You have to give the context. So what's wrong with it.

so look for like oversized criticisms of things which are completely ordinary, which is somebody tell you their credentials before they tell you what they tell you Then here's the biggest one look for them to. You can say straw man, but I don't think that's what's going on. Are actually hallucinating my opinions, so I want to play one for you so that you can. You can hear yourself. If you don't hear a live, you might think I'm misinterpreting list. So I don't know how far I am into. This is thirty minutes into no agenda podcast number, one thousand, four hundred and nine. So if you're looking for yourself as deftly worthless, Is it s, interesting stuff, so that no agenda podcast, you can find it everywhere. Just google it and it shows-

on four zero nine set about the thirty minute mark play a little bit. What are you talking about me? Smart, now the what they're doing so they're, starting by saying that they are generally unfavourably, which is exactly what I did with them. Which is also why I like them, that's exactly what they should be doing to set up the conversation, Does anybody know they're, not biased against me and some general away, this justice techniques? That does actually good technic surprised, because I think he sacked trapped in the mass formation he's gonna prove their own trapped in the mass formation, in other words alone, hypnotized ever projection? I used a figure, wasn't a thing: Those who so many cases of those is undeniable at this point, so that doesn't mean they're wrong right, so so far

now that there are accusing me of being hypnotized essentially, and I would accuse them of the same, which I'm doing right now so so far to tie you wouldn't bill, tell anything one where the other from this

he'll showed, and I also believe that you and I have heard explanations- mass formation as a pretence covered their well enough, so the we comprehending and can lead to read it and explain it and measure Scott out absurd, debunking versus, were I we believe, a word that is all came out of the sea watch, Doktor Peter Mccullough on the road and show and ask where Mccullough brought up. The mass formation has got out of you pointed out. He said, he's a trained hypnotist effect with price. They went off the bat. We have proof that he is very well trained hypnotist,

You know this guy. Definitely I'm also. They don't know good points. The Duma good points And the reason why the so that's what it unfortunately didn't really to research about the sea, refreshes memory, which is incorrect. I read about the theory before I commented: Gub State any store with one of my favorite things that we talk about here just about Peter Mccall. I think he's not good at evaluating data so when he says that some countries have

experience with I from acting as just false John went away at list so you're, my playwright, so they claim they played was me say that there is no country we have identified the I remarked in their solve the problem. as somebody. Some of you disagree, the later I'll say if you researching you'll, find that there are no countries that for them to remember the claim. The claim is there are no countries now watch the response? My claim that there are no countries does seem to have a good result. No countries want simply by civil war crime in your head website assigned to a secure. I ve met, adapt.

I was nine something you're other I can't handle, but just about seventy study showing its effectiveness that have been peer review their one web page where they say always use I ever met increases unproven, have unleashed. Seventy five more study to the earth. What did I say and then what did you say he called it a whopper, meaning that what I was saying was clearly wrong or a lie And, though, what was his response was a different topic. I said there are no countries that have demonstrated is working. He changed it to them, no study showed that there are studies that are a peer reviewed.

Did you hear me say in the clear played that there are no peer reviewed over backed and studied? I've never said that I've said the opposite. I've said there are lots of ivory, backed and studies. They show it works, but they all have certain limitations of size or no control, or it was an observational some stuff like that. Now you can see this clearly right. Cause you're my judges, who are the ones who are judging, whose and cognitive dissonance did you clearly see that he changed the subject to debunk me, while actually just beyond the role topic, Did he ever debug the claim that there are countries that that there are no country is or towns raising that have solved the problem with I've elected,

Now, if anybody is new to me, I'm not tell you, I remarked and doesn't work, I'm not telling you that cause. I've actually said that you, if I got in this situation, I pray you take it risk management. I think we're going to find an improbable doesnt work, but that's just statistical YO protection. If I had to that my life on it I'd say: there's a solid ten percent chance. It could make a difference. I take it. You have my doctor agree that some soap, they ve hallucinated an entire opinion that I don't hold the that there's some now no studies, they show its works. Of course I've talked about it at length so that That's the first still living if we have also for whose oozing cognitive dissonance so far made earlier than it looks like that right.

I mean I'm not the one who can tell us. Why need a third party for closure by us for me, so that's also problem will see what else is silent Sir John says where their smoke there's fire, meaning that there is so many indications that it works out at all be wrong. That's not really a sophisticated analysis of any figures, does he know what else has lots of smoke? Everything? That's not true everything they you thought was true for awhile, maybe from Russia Collusion D, you name it. They all have plenty of smoke, but they're. Not

how much smokers are that Hillary Clinton has massively bend executing people lots. I don't think it's true personally. Mcafee surprised by all thing is true. There are plenty of things they have tons. Of smoke. That aren't you, do you do I we do randomized control trials. I don't think under work does now, that's not fair and nobody thinks of his head, but the argument for randomized control. Trial is a. U ever want to say this. You never want to say there's so much smoke. There must be fire, that's what you're trying to avoid with science Science is trying to cure this problem of people saying they can see it with their own eyes. I'm looking right at it will involve us evidence. That's the problem. The science cures

I saw you isn't. The problem is that it was science cures while claiming a scientific insight. Of course, there is the use in discontinued use, reuse, independent, Washington, embers go up and down. So that is a bad thing to say. I was listen. How he arrives late, assist him by the way I'm Peter Mccullough, who used to was the editor of a couple of journalists were all you did was look at. Danger is kind of belies overlooked that fact he was a you're himself as the work, I think he's. So. Therefore, I can say that I'm overlooking the fact that Doctrine Mccullough is very experienced in peer review of looking studies. Did I overlook that?

There's a guy like that. Now I'm saying that if you took somebody who is a data analysis expert and you next to to doktor Mccullough with all of his all of his experience, a lucky, a peer reviewed or being a peer review person, I was they wouldn't be clothes. the different expertise. That would be like me, say. Well, I've been attention to medicine for a long time, read a lot of articles, some as good as a doctor. I mean I've been reading up on it. I have experience with my own medical problems and stuff, so basically a doctor or no, no, no If you dont study data analysis, you don't get there just by looking at studies after your lot deeper than that.

So that's the exaggerated laugh. Did you hear it? So I said that the the doctors talked about was LEO highly skilled in his areas of expertise, but they do not include looking at data and I'll give the exact example that he's not aware of There is no country has had good success and probably not aware of the may be some others them. So Bolivia played the laughing anchors. You you have to your. There was almost so when he says that some countries should apply to everything. We know what to do with. We know exactly what.

well. I think I can go into one with up so boils they make some claims about that. I think that I remarked in is nonsense. Nope nope, that does not captured my claim, and they said that I'm a quote all live on vaccinations, those of you who, since the beginning, would you say that that is a good characterisation of my opinion that I have been quote all in on vaccinations. Now, it's not even fucking close. It's not even in the ballpark, I'm literally the only person. I know who predicted the vaccinations. Wouldn't work can do you know anybody else? I mean some experts said it before I at it and that's they want. Unfortunately, the reasoning that I use was the experts. Have we been working?

the corona virus vaccination Ferrajo decades we're not even close, there's nothing. This change exe, the pandemic? Why in the world? Would we suddenly know how to make this thing that we have known how to make for twenty years? And we ve been trying hard. I was there, I said yeah, that's pretty good boy, the odds that, by coincidence the pandemic would head of exactly the time we knew how to make a vaccination. We never knew how to make this possible. I was I wanted to feel optimistic about it, but I also predicted it wouldn't work and then the didn't. As of vaccination. Now I do say that the vaccinations work is in the sense that reducing the chance of of major illness? That's the official word. I didn't do any studies myself, but the official word is reducing risk. So.

If you see the maniacal laugh and all that uttered will happen to curry indirect, but it looks like cognitive dissonance. As I think they're watching leader, I remarked in opinion, go to Hell. They probably thought binary about me that I was either for vaccinations against on both of those or bad opinions and my pain. Scott has gradually lost my respect on these issues. I think is investments may be part of his blind spot investments will invest. So have I didn't investment a little while and regenerate, but I sold it so I don't have an and I just hold of like few months. I don't think I don't know of any and investments I have. That would have any

bearing on this, but when you say that I've actually, let me let me respond to this threat. I'm always open to you saying what you disagree with me, but I've lost I respect fuck, you fuck you fuck you and everybody who talks like that. Really. I don't want to hear about you losing your respect for me, because I didn't ask for your fucking respect. I ask for you too, baby, engage in the argument. So fuck you, I don't have any respect for you either zero all right. I mention that the publication Revolver had a investing. Story about the possibility The January six had some FBI operatives pushing what happened now I claimed that it looked like a credible.

Reporting, but somebody suddenly a chart the showed the various media entities on a graph so that you can see if they were credible or not had revolve like way down in the not credible area with interpol wars. According to whoever put that joined together, I think self who in the world, could put together a chart of media buyers. Who could do that? when the world would you not have CNN and in New York Times as the least credible entities who gets to say was credible, like. If any of us knew what was true, we would need the news we're all confused so by your. My question I haven't seen by debunk. It gave her mind. The revolver did not state The FBI was behind that little now the position they said

here's, the guy looks like the FBI. Here's a guy who's, indicted that look suspicious, here's another one that is not indicted, look suspicious If you put him altogether does tell pretty powerful story. If the story is complete enough right, if they didn't leave out of context and if what they reported was true, they show their sources, so you don't have to wonder where they got it from there, so, as I seen a debunk of the revolver reported because I haven't yet the candy I'm open to it, Somebody says the January six looks like the Charlottesville. Well, you know. The Charlottesville Marge there. I've got a lot of questions. I don't think it was organic.

clearly there were real racists who organised it. That's all clearly in the record, but who runs the racists Think of the racist who organised thereto are completely devoid of any outside influence there, so it to the to the extent that we don't know who is backing the racists. We don't know No, I haven't nothing so and there's no curiosity about it, I can tell you what I know, but I'm not going to. Let me just tell you the truth. A little bit of a deeper industry on your what powers were behind that than those come to light, but maybe maybe there were no, you learn more says, he'll, be paying more than eleven billion dollars and taxes this year in response to hold up

but, like Elizabeth Warren Say, is not doing enough and I'm wondering mostly anybody's are repaid in taxes. Certainly in what here right did he just didn't just break the world record and taxpayers how would you like to be so rich though you can solve every problem? If you think about it,. How many of you can solve this problem of the earlier you're? Somebody says utopian of taxes, Elon Musk and say well, throws eleven billion dollars at it will make you stop talking, and you think yourself well, Oh man, you me stop talking in the same way. Like all right, if you complaining about what It shows how about eleven billion dollars will show you up fairly, not didn't work less a funny. Poor people will still say, doesn't pay of taxes.

To me the funniest part will be that this won't work, but it's a hell of a try. I just love the fact that we were always forget that tussle doesn't do marketing loathing space access and that the mosque. Their marketing solely does something like this. do you know what really happened, you know the real story. Ass was the bill story of. Why you souls luck? Anybody was the real reason. He saw the stock public relations publicity. Somebody says stock options to make profit know I had to exercise options was at it. I thought there was an involuntary part of it.

Thank you. Diversification in, if you make, if you're the riches person in the world by your wealth, is entirely in a few different entities to get some eleven there need to get some of your money out of the things that have a specific risk, because it could be that tomorrow somebody bills and you know fusion engine and puts it in a Prius, and next nobody is buying the desolate, so any company has the odds of going to zero, no matter how bigger successful the company is still as two years ago and zero, so the smart thing to do is to find an excuse to take money off the table and put it

somewhere else where nothing can happen to your invulnerable, so Elon Musk does a totally normal economic move, which is to take some money off the table and diversify, but he turned into this public spectacle of paying more taxes and that a human, and the donkey analyse was worn and Bernie Sanders Eddie. You say that everything is done for one reason sometimes, but it's very simple people, when the Isla must does something. There are probably five reasons and we can figure three of them and to other I haven't you so the other, like five reasons to do this. One of them, was that the US is responding to the criticism. The others are even better, but it was a perfect exit point. Does he can make it look like he's, not cashing out,

He made cashing out, look like he was paying taxes. Could you do that? Would you be smart enough to figure out how to make taking your money off the table and keeping it forever cashing out? Could you make cashing out? Look like you you're paying taxes. Now you have a good. He totally pull this off. This is one of the greatest. persuasions lays you'll oversee amidst the tape was, are either as a great Guffey said the other day, and I love this- raise. The public the hostage negotiator to help us get out of the mandates and lock bones, and whatever else is coming at us and the reason is because the governments around too but the public needs to weigh risk versus your life and we weigh things differently so

in almost every other situation? It's better to let the government do the Republic thing and representatives This is just a one, unique situation, whether the wrong tool, if war breaks out. You don't want the public voting on it. What the government, so all we got, this ill LOS Angeles until we can sort out what's was real than the public can get involved with the pandemic, they were never the right tool, except in the fog of war stage in which they were. But at this point was not the right tool anymore. They were at the beginning and trouble is that the public doesn't have any anyone organise short of the government itself and the groups that might be resisted the mandates are too diverse, so you ve got the black Americans might be resisting at some level you ve gotta. Conservatives are some level and leave they tend not to join together. There are some cases

where they are joining together. But I would I would say that we need a hostage negotiator. Adam dopamine suggested indirectly suggested the baby. Somebody like a trump, Somebody like a job but he's also used to devices so amazing if you do that, it will be one of the greatest spectacles of all time if he played. If you just played us right. I literally sound like I love you just the go. She ate this and see if we can come up with a date or a metric that the sets us free. but here's what I think we need. I think we need a hostage No, she, it was not too identified with one side or the other to simply pick a date and say were all taken or masks off if you're in the state that

has masks we're all going to take her medicine off on whatever day and that's just the day. We're just going to take her mask off on that day and maybe March first, if I had to pick a time That's a march first now you don't like it to be so right, but we do have the comecon it. We don't know everything that we need to know about it and, of course we could change the date of something came up March. First change it, but I think we need to have a date and I think it would be irresponsible to have that date, not right away. You us little time to sort out what strewn. What's not yet.

in anybody says issued about a year ago. I get what you say: I get it, they went if you can think of who'd be a good new asters negotiator. But please don't pick me. I feel like I be the semi good at it, but I don't want to pay. Me sounds like a terrible John So about the great reset your you know before that, let me clarify my thoughts about the mass formations psychosis. I don't think I've done a good job of tell you my.

objections to so. The idea behind the mass formation psychosis is that there is a set of conditions, have happened that could lead to totalitarianism. Now one of the things that the no agenda podcast said is that, since I was discounting that as being afraid of Heller. They said no, it doesn't sound about Hitler's motel terrorism, to which I say: ok, ok, it's not about healer is about to tell it areas which is about Heller. I'm gonna get that there's a difference, but we're not really talk about a real distinction here that the fear is a powerful people who don't have your interests will take control. So here's what might take his and mass formation psychosis, it doesn't add anything to the understanding

were always in it were always in the mass formation psychosis, in other words, were always confused were were always national was happening, were always frightened about the future. Why Why are always the case? Because the fake news did you catch this play, I saw you heard about the suvs they killed. People wasn't the person driving. It was the suv hereabouts the stones through itself. We keep. but all these things that are happening, ozone, there's no personal. Happily doing We have the mass formation psychosis ha. sort of like nobody's problem is it I mean nobody, nobody caused it.

There's no name you could put on that or just it just happened on this phone. Here's my problem with it. It's the fake news. That is the problem. There is a name to put on this. If the fake news were telling us the truth or ultimately just one truth, even if it were fake, we'd I'll, be on the same side, and we These are worried by the business world The fake news is to keep you uneasy. Isolate you and divide you that's how the business model works. Once everybody worked up and clicking, stuff. So when you say, oh, the problem is a mass formations. Yes, you have shifted blame from the obvious guilty parties. The guilty parties are the people running the vague lives who have removed all confidence from the public

And scared us too that if you scare us at this In time your teaching us than all the the news is fake. How is a public gonna feel? Well, it's gotta be exactly the situation to create a mass formations. so I'm not saying that the conditions do exist because they clearly do. I'm not saying that that doesn't contribute to the psychosis, because it clearly does all I'm saying is, is a diversion doesn't add anything what were basically adding water to the ocean and tell you about whether. Yeah, you might be a little bit more confused. Now you might be a little bit more aware of the facts are fake, but we ve always been here. We always work confused and hypnotized. We always were one inch away from totalitarianism.

You know what prevents it do. You know a preventive has prevented us so far from descending into totalitarianism in the United States. Do you know what. Partial credit for overseeing saying the second amendment, which has a lot of people on the locals platform. I was just say: the constitution Second amendment being you, you could say that the foundation of the constitution, in a way you can make that argument so all takes I'll. Take second amendment as a correctly answer, because looking the constitution that we do have a set of checks and balances. However imperfect the keep to tell it area and at Bay Totalitarianism. Back now, if we packed the Supreme Court totalitarianism,

do you know who knew that Joe Biden, even Joe Biden, knew you don't pack the Supreme Court cuz you get rid of your checks and balances and then yeah. Then the mass formation psychosis is going to eat you alive. It'll eat you alive, they that protection away, but the constitution has for a few hundred years, provided us a weird protection against it. It's like yourself correcting system, which is what makes it so magic, and So I do not deny that there is a mass formation psychosis. I simply add to it. Then it's always. Oh, maybe a little worse like adding water to the ocean, but not in a way that makes doesn't help. You understand that if it doesnt tell you what to do about it, doesnt predict better, doesn't do anything. So the cleaner story is the faint new.

says so messed with us that were looking for any kind of explanation that causes psychosis. So look at the fake news, don't be diverted by a clever but accurate, clever, but accurate idea about the mass were named formation psychosis, it's a diversion, but shrewish jewish, there's nothing about. It is untrue. Let's talk about the great reset, how If you believe that the great reset is a clever plot by the elites to gain power and control. I believe you believes that. Yes, yes, yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes! Yes, yes, well, the great reset in my opinion is nothing like that. Let me tell you what I think is so it is based on a fairly in June. Twenty twenty there was. The great reset was the theme of

annual meeting of the World Economic Forum, so the first part, is true as there was the elites did get together and talk about the great reset, so that parts everybody agrees is true that just a fact. These topics was convened by Prince Charles and Bob and other people and the topics were climate change stuff, so the idea was to use the current pandemic and all the chaos that creates, along with any chaos that comes from. The change itself to say, less, rethink everything and see if this is a situation to fix things. Now is that conspiracy, if a bunch of people say hey, we ve got a situation to fix a bunch of things like climate and

your fairness and other things, because it's completely over or if they're telling their showing you their work they're doing in the public is that a conspiracy And this is what they want power and control. I always reject that argument because, again, that's like adding water to the ocean. Everybody wants power and control everybody. You wanted over yourself. Some people wanted over other people so that they can have a better life for themselves. but we all power and control is no exceptions that that so when you say that these great risk people are looking for power and control. That's true, but it does say anything doesn't add anything. Because the gray reset isn't like one thing, this just a whole bunch of people doing things, and in a condition which is rare, which, as we can stop and rethink everything.

I would say that the pandemic is a great reset. We ve rethought commuting. We ve rethought healthcare. We for he thought pandemic major stuff. We ve rethought everything so there it is a great risk that, in the sense that you can clear the slate it's a alright right. If we are going to start today, I would you build better so to speak. So I don't find anything even slightly alarming about the great reset does is basically just a push for green technology in babies, more socialism, but that's already here, it's just the same stuff with the look on it and I don't think that great reset gave the many extra capability or power you just saw mansion killed, build better, so is close but doesn't look like the gray recent is gonna reset too much. Here's some good news, I was sort of under played

On CNN website, but I didn't see that any worlds they said thanks, multiple atmospheric river events, says very important: atmospheric river events, the average snow back in California. It's going from eighteen percent to ninety eight percent. In two weeks we just went from no snow, packed we're going to have another drought. Cuz, that's a big source of our water comes from still back and we're having yet again a drought the summer, and looks like we just took a big step towards making the big problem go away. Now, if you don't live in California, this meant nothing to you, but this is a big problem not having water, because we're not doing enough to give Decelerator anything else so. We have to rely on nature to save us from bad government.

It looks like nature stopped in, at least for now is to take a lot more water too, to be secure and California. But this is a big deal. A big deal. like it. On the on the list of all the Good NEWS that I could receive in my life, this would be right at the top, because a year you have to leave California. If you know of water, disparate much gave over bad enough. We barely and electricity all right in the twitter highlights where they, though, highlight a story that everybody is talking about, Yesterday they said they had this heading two. The story on Twitter said science and public health experts say the vaccines are safe for most people. What most Did they downgrade vaccines from everybody? Almost everybody needs to get one that they don't.

It all the way, the most fifty one percent. Fifty one percent I mean to say, is fifty one percent, but the most is a pretty wide space. Isn't it? I don't think we can ignore this change and message. You think you can ignore that. I think this is a pretty clear statement that whoever wrote the headline anyway twitter is is hedges and that's. That is a big deal in our country, ten Ngos what's going on apparently found she was talking about we're all gonna, make lots and lots of tests for the covert available So there are going to be ten thousand centres for a free testing. Ten thousand centres- and it's gonna happen injustice. The whigs. So this is heading in the right direction. Of course, we must ask the question:

Why? Whether we have that already what took long, and I think the answer is corruption. I'm going to stick with that statement of when I consider obvious, I don't think it's incompetence. I don't think his money. It just looks like somebody in this mix was corrupt and stop something from happening for somebody but we don't know details- are China amazingly somehow got Chinese tempest are pink way who disappeared because she claimed a Communist party leader raped. Her And now she sang in an interview that she has done a Robin should never used any one of sexually assaulted. Nope. nope had been misunderstood. Sorry nope that never happened now.

What do you see China disappeared story to take, something you know is to adjust, make it disappear. Can they do that? They can do that. It works because they can do The United States, so certainly you can do it in China. Certainly the people of China will just now hear that that never happened just like stories disappear in the United States. Are our media disappear stories overtime? So yeah they can actually do this and it will work is so bold and so obvious that you say to yourself all that stuff we're going to work. It's so bold, an obvious that that's a lie who wants me at this time today. They re so anyway. The testing may be good

I tweeted the other day a reference. I think it came from Wikipedia or something They talked about how gleans Maxwell's dad was a famous media mobile, had at his funeral a lot of important people, including six former or occurred heads of Mossad Israeli until for that I was accused of being a Jason to or to close to being Anti semitic by David has any, and he called me out for apparently, an old anti semitic trope that the that. Israel or the Jews are running some kind of Petko ring which had never heard of it. My my weird, my weird life is that pilloried by people who are literally hallucinating opinions. For me, I've never heard of that now I had heard the end.

Origins agencies would be very interested in what Epstein noon. What kinds of salacious stories about important people he might now this is obviously the c I a CIA would want to know russian intelligence would want to know my six would want to know and Israel one now. When they, who would not want to know that, if you knew the Epstein had the like sexual goods, a bunch of famous people every until agencies should want to know about that, I never heard this. I never heard that. Is there some kind of anybody hurt this. Have you heard some kind of anti semitic thing that Israel or Jews were somehow behind some kind of a penalty. as I even a thing is anybody even I've never heard of that now now I'm anti semitic for. Somebody I never heard of a block them for being an angel.

Clay Travis had a good thread today, really most of it You said Joe Biden passes entire twenty twenty. Actually, sorry, let me read it again. Joe Biden based. is election basically on trust in the science and beating covered it. Of course that didn't happen. And clay asked us to do this. One fundamental exercise: address that it was Trump charge and that the pandemic, when just the way went same outcome, now say trumpeted everything. The Biden but Tromp was in charge. Clay says, I believe the media would have vigorously cover the covid vaccine failure. True, it would have been the Trump vaccine, the failed, that's all it would have been about, but instead it's take the vaccine, it's not as good as we thought, but it still good.

And Trump would likely have already been impeached. Overs failures to takeovers seriously, good, they blew states would shut down by the wall, aka stuff, bad stuff. What happened And then place, as the reality is almost nothing we have done, has had any impact on covert. You know, do you believe him? Do you believe that nothing we ve done his at the impact and over the? No that's not even close. But that does not even the same universes. True.

is surely we can stop it, but do you believe in the vaccines? Don't reduce Leah? The risk of serious outcomes is everybody here who believes that the vaccines don't even do that that they don't reduce the risk of a serious outcomes of, say: yes, not conclusive, yes, say: lesser yeses on the locals platform about on Youtube? How many of you believe the vaccines dope at least reduce your risk? Now we're not talk about that. They bear bring their own risk as well, because that's real interesting away. I don't think that is a statement that should be accepted face value. I think that face masks we don't know, goes theirs.

Wait to do a controlled trial, so I don't know if they work or not. I think that vaccines, click, the science or the experts say it and all the data. I think a hundred percent data says it reduces risk right. There's no data on this as otherwise, then I'm worth so, they get clay goes too far, but you may see good point that, if had been Trump had been treated completely Lee They re all yours by updated list to know what I'm dealing with an MP see somebody who can do independence thinking, if I, These raises the internet now some of these are specific to me, but These phrases are by key not to have a debate with this person on twitter if they mention jumping the shark, I'm real the point here, boss, ha ha, ha the matrix soil in green anybody being an apologist about it,

I saw it with my own eyes. Were I heard with my own ears, sheep references, nineteen, eighty four movie or book Hitler references, fascism, soy boy or Scotty Scotty. So if you have any those, probably your dear Little NBC, that's my list now. I think you will agree that the best show you ve ever seen, possibly the best thing that ever happened in the history of the universe, but we ve come to the end of our time here and re on time. That's how I play right on time. Aright

I will talk to you. Did I hear a common system do here? A couple hours said Lily Times interview we didn't see delta coming. Apparently these might viruses mutate. Well, ok, that's a poorly stand sky. Here's a common! I dont, understand no agenda. Podcast was not a private conversation; it was meant for a public consumption when you subtract their persuasion efforts. How much was left is cognitive, dissonance, utterly insolent. What about the great Barrington declaration? You send an interesting.

Aspirations issue with vaccines, aspiration issue I us off now. I will talk to you later.