Good morning, everybody and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you is called coffee was got atoms and it gets better. Every single time does really. You know believe it come back tomorrow. She'll be amazed, it's better better tomorrow and if you like to take it up to really stratospheric levels, the kind goodness that nobody has ever seen before as I come from other. Thus a tanker genesis, Dinah canteens last a vessel any kind, fellow with your favorite liquid ally coffee, enjoyed me now for the unparalleled pleasure as the dope only the other day.

It's called the simultaneous happen is going to happen now go so I now I can't be positive by things has the best, whatever well before I forget the interesting thing is happening on Twitter this this morning. So some people got for Christmas and Adam Dope meanness talking about this this morning unto her. Talking about getting a oculist said, you know one of the three d fantasy metaphors kind of tools, and let me tell you

you gotta be here. This a lot from people who make the transition from real life to the matter verse. You can't believe how good it is, and at here's, the where things still primitive. Did I ever tell you that the best way you can tell something will be big. Is this? The bad version is popular. We're, In terms of the men of virtual worlds and three d, virtual reality is not in terms of virtual reality. We're is at the fax machine level compared to the internet. Roughly speaking,. And already people who have tried it and you can see some of the comments this morning. People gotta get veer equipment for Christmas in many cases, And people will tell you if you haven't you.

Yourself, you dont know. What's coming now, I've told the story before, but I think the sums it up. Several years ago now was maybe three years ago, I gather the VR set. Imagine how much better they are three years later and one of the virtual worlds had a cliff and although I knew I was standing in a room in my own home and no danger could come to me Couldn't I couldn't tell myself to move my leg to what would make me fall off the virtual cliff and it was the damned thing I couldn't myself into it, even though I knew it could possibly be dangerous, because the thing is, I am trying to explain here. Is that your brain in your body will treat this as real. Didn't know you know it isn't now, that's the thing people don't get if you don't

That knowing is not real, doesn't matter you're missing the biggest part of this you will feel it like is real. Here's the weirdest sport, if you do a ride In virtual reality, but in the actual world you just sitting in the chair and your chair is not It all tell me if some of you have done this way. You can confirm this. Do you feel. like the motion, even in your stomach. Do you feel it even though, is not happening. Every person says yes, everyone, so he says no. Really. Then you haven't tried the right. If you say no, you haven't tried dry games, because if you know it is the right one, do you like it get that effect, but that's the one

that are really make. You feel the like: a roller coaster or a flying one. You feel it. I feel, like Israel and here's the bigger point of this. I've been told you tell uses the dawn of Trump. That Trump would change more than politics. They would change how we view reality itself and they did. specifically. We saw that are sources of trusted. News were bullshit, in a way we ve never seen before, and that was drop John. that and I can see that come in for a mile away. That's why I predicted it before before it was even less

So what we said in reality is not changing he's not just changing politics, and then you add the metaphors and then you add how will feel about the virtual realities now now put those to put together the fact but nothing we thought was true was true. Wish we're learning that all of our new sources and experts and data are all really biased and subjective. Put that, together with the fact that you can experience the world as if it's real with him, so you know, isn't real. What's gonna happen to our understanding of reality itself now at top of that the richest one of the smartest people in the world live now.

Is a non apologetic. Proponent of the simulation being are actual experience that now those are three separate things right, trumpet fake news and learning that all of our experts are foolish. It the better verse, sort of just a cool technology that has no future and then the idea of the simulations, all those three things are happening at the same time as not inadequate, Reality is about to get a reboot wit. We are going to have an awakening. That will be one of the great ones of of history, What do you realize the limits of your own rational abilities? Everything will look different. Everything will look different,

I can say that as someone who has made this journey from the thinking, I was irrational creature and then thinking that other people were irrational, but at least I'd like you to do that. That was my. My trip My trip was: what is wrong with all of these other people? Why is it that I keep getting the right answer All the other people are wrong all the time and then, by the time I learned, hypnosis and started something about human psychology realized waiting maid. wrong do and then once you once you're open. The possibility that were all wrong all the time, meaning that were creating subjective little worlds and just living within once you realize that you can't go back, you can't go back.

And I'll, tell you a lot of people, are there already? So you know I'm not alone. I got. I got a tweet this morning from somebody was sort of risen to that level and can see the whole field, and I have to ask him: what is background was because you didn't have a debt is bio. I thought The hell are you there something you know that other people don't know I haven't, got the responsive. Are there as part of this theme, I did a troll challenge today. I'd like to do this once in a while to demonstrate the weakness of our subjective. periods and what I do is, I said, Wait name one thing: you think: I believe that it is different from what you believe, that's also true, and what of course happens as a whole bunch of people imagining something that they think I

thence than writing down, and then I say nope nope. I don't believe that or you left out some contacts, so a change, the meaning or some like that. You can see that. Dozens, if not hundreds of people immediately present themselves have undeniable undeniable hallucinations about who I am and what I believe and would have done it. You can see it plainly because I, no my opinion. So when somebody says you believe acts, and I say no, I believe why I get that right every time you know why, because I actually know my opinion, I'm guessing everybody else's guessing, but I know it. So you know you can't fact check the other people. I can because I know what's happening in my mind, even if I'm wrong, presumably I'm romola,

Yes, sir, we're all irrational, what you learn that you'll be in good shape, There are things that people did call me out on opinions that they disagree with it. I'll give you a few examples. One person trying to be funny a troll said when I said name one thing you think I believe this different volubly, a troll said: Dilbert is funny occasion be there. I think, dominance funny, but does not fully, and I actually addressed islands, because Even- the troll they failed, was like a failed troll, because I dont believe Gilbert is funny. I mean even that assumption was wrong. What I believe is the Dilber is created to appeal to a certain part of the public and that group of the public likes a lot and laughs and they likes it. There

there's so much they pay for it. That's all. I know for sure, and I am one hundred percent sure that other people- lots of up- don't find it interesting at all. So when somebody says I think Dilber is funny. I say now that does it makes sense. Nothing is funny Nothing is funny. All there is is just some people like some stuff, that's it here's another people, people complained that I said everybody's vaccination choice was based on fear, but that the fears would be different. Some people feared the vaccination. Some people feared the covered. Some people fear government control, etc about others? No Nano Scott were our decisions.

Absolutely rational. Does we looked at the costs and benefits and we were never afraid. We never felt any fear. We, Look at the information as it existed and made a call. Oh, that's, actually accurate. I would say that there is an accurate push back My point- and I will only offer this- this clarification- When I said everybody makes their decision based on their fears, fear to me: is a very large category. I'm not talking about the fear that makes you quake in your shoes, although some people probably had that about the virus. About the kind of fear that says I don't want to go to the DMV, I'm talking about the kind of fear this, as I have to see my in laws for Christmas. I, like my in laws but.

You talk about other people, so you can sell us, no fear, but one, Talking about it, I'm talking about a a willingness to take the path as best as opposed to the law. good path, and so it was suggested underwater, and I take this suggestion that a better way to refrain my opinion so would be less confusing and more more persuasive. I suppose as well Is that, instead of saying that everybody made a decision based on fear, you could put it in a positive way,

the positive way would be. We all followed our own illusions of safety, meaning that we all did a cost benefit analysis. I didn't say we didn't, but we all have a different opinion which all call an illusion, because we can now right if we could know for sure the outcome of every person based on every decision, while that it would be an illusion, but if you're just predicting based on guesses and variables that we can measure ass kind of an illusion. Maybe overstating freer preferences, but it seems I to me anyway so I'll rephrase Latin save that everybody. decision about the vaccination was Mr Wynn and illusion about their own safety and then add or convenience.

so is based on an illusion about their own safety or convenience. Now the convenience bar is more objective if he had to do it to travel or keep your job or make your spouse happier something I'll give you that wasn't fear based. Except will you give me that, being afraid of your spouses response is a little bit fear, but does not big fear, psych fear with less it's not big fear. What? the elders, a home innovations, that's the big share capital F, but little fear we do there just show you want to ignore, or you want to avoid. let me make this offer to you.

Apparently, Biden is going to be talking to the governor's today. Can you confirm that I think I saw that the bidens going to be talking to all governors today by phone, and I think he's talking about cover it. That's the topic. Give me a confirmation. That's happening today, I see a confirmation now this is when I think we have to get serious about the the idea that we should ask not what the country can do for us as well. You can do for them because this is the point were I'm sure I am very confident that the governors and by what the restrictions to end they just want to do it in a way that they protect their jobs and presumably the public as well. So I think we need to have.

Right now, and I'm hoping that the February one idea, the idea that we should have some kind of a target that our governments should tell us about, even if they adjust it later based on Dave, but between us. Like adults, and say? Well, we gonna chauffeur February one but this isn't that the death, the death rate, stays low and keeps dropping. Would that be fair? So I hope the February one day to go through, because this is exactly the time the Biden and governors should get together and say our eight everybody lets you four February ones Rasmussen has a loophole says that by lose at his ease tied for his lowered approval of forty percent, so

How many of you think Biden wants to continue the restrictions? How many of you think that he actually wants that cause? It will be good for him in the election result in I'm. Seeing some people say yes, yes, well, so way this for me. If, if Biden could claim, he ended all the restrictions wouldn't do we get more votes than if he simply kept the restrictions in button that given some benefits with male in votes, which strategies I feel like solving the biggest problem in the world is always the best strategy. Do they think keeping the biggest problem that we have in place is how you get real acted when you could you have the tools to remove it?

I have a feeling that claiming success would be this more play. So I see your point, I see your point that you might be some malian or other advantage. If he keeps things like don't bother enough, there's enough lockdown, if it's just the blue states that are locked down at that point was the difference. Billy ones lockdown will be the ones that would he was gonna win anyway. He's not gonna win Florida because or not uptown, apparently also most Americans, Gordon Dress, but simple side with ok, that there are only two genders: Are you surprised to talk about this topic more It was, while also, they asked me Scott State European. How many genders are there.

Well, let me show this is a real debate, because, if four people in the same room. I don't know that they would disagree, except for what word to put on things, and I suppose the word you put on it. Can you determine policy and stuff? so does matter, but it's such a silly thing because People say there are only two genders because you, if you can have baby, you're free bell and if you can produce sperm, I suppose your mail. Those are my own definitions. I guess so I would say that if you want to use those definitions of biology than their exactly two sexes, add, if you want to use them more socially focused one, then people are all over the board about what they prefer, but has nothing to do with whether they can have babies, room that fear is holding you back Scott. I don't know if I have any fear about this topic, because

yeah, but it generally, you can always be safe. If you say is low everybody's followed the law. They should have as much freedom as they can get short of your bothering other people to the point of ridiculous. So I think you can have both. I think we can say there are two genders if you're talking about biology is still by socially the way people think of themselves and want to be treated. Let's let them have the freedom to do that, which doesn't tell you anything about what bathrooms they should was forsake should play. Those are all separate decisions. Best and worst predictions of twenty twenty one, so years alone,

Progress report about where we are, in terms of our assent to a higher level of awareness, so this will be a little marker of how close we Arta really understanding of our inability to be rational. The a predictions one of the best predictions for two thousand and twenty one is also the worst prediction for two thousand and twenty one, which is my prediction. That Republicans would be hunted. I did a ball of coarser. Thousands, people who say Ellie Other definitely being hunted lemme. Give you five examples, but of course politico just an article on this: I same protection, the one that thousands of people was less one of the best predictions over Racine nailed. It got into politics

as one of the worst predictions, because nothing like that happen now. What could be more perfectly. let's say perfect, summary of where we are as a thinking species The perfect summary is that we cannot tell the difference between the best prediction and the worst one of my favorite quotes from Mark TWAIN is that people can tell the difference between good news and bad the first. I me here. That is a lesson I true and then you can see examples of it. We actually cannot tell the difference between good news and bad. lots of lots times she just fell, and we also don't know the difference between something the starting in something. This finishing tat take the pandemic for them. We can't tell always martyrdom.

So we don't know the best protection from the worst. We don't know was good was bad, we don't know was evil was good, we don't know whose helping loose hurting, we don't know, is being selfish, we don't know who's being generous, we don't do anything, that's where we are. But once you realize that you get to go to the next level of awareness, I have here's a I used to predict things. You could use this to it works every time if you want your predictions to be accurate, predict something that's already happily and then he was like a genius. So here's my prediction, I said production and twenty twenty two big farms or convince experts. There is a mental condition. The one Michael

overwhelmed us and there will be a pill for it. That's my prediction: do you know? I am confident that protection because already happening it's already happening. You don't think that lots of people are getting antidepressants because of. How their dealing with all its social sensitivity. so I don't think you will. This disease will be called overworked us, but it might be called hyper. Social sensitivity, if I told you there was a new condition, called hypersensitivity to social pressure or whatever Would you say that doesn't exist, What would you say or that all exists, and this message was people's minds, you would say have existed right. You might not

you have it, but you would say that all other people certainly have this problem. Where are so sensitive about race and being insulted and whose being put down and what's unfair, that is becoming an actual mental disorder. Now I don't think you'll be a new pill for it. I think they re purpose existing pills, but they're gonna give peoples Eriksson God, knows what else for their social oversensitive really does anybody want to argue with that? I'm pretty sure is happening right now. All lobbyists aggression how many you think it's happening right now. Do you know who has become. So woke that they had to seek therapy and that their own pills, because some kind of pill over locals the answers are yes? Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes,

So that's how you make a prediction with high likelihood of being right, Verdict was already happening, makes a lot easier. Predicting. Why hasn't happened yet out hard adore recommended at all. I made this following suggestion based on all this, that the school should each kids, how to deal with criticism as an actual lesson or a class and specifically the how do be free from nearly embarrassed, shame or social pressure of what everybody thinks about you, because, I think was social media dead is taken. The idea that was already a problem, which is what other people think of you and turned from one of those problems you deal with into the biggest problem now for kids, the biggest problem is what people think of them, especially what they say and some kind of did.

the media about them. So I think that we need to give gives a class, and I think that class should be called. Perhaps everyone? Is someone else's weirdo so that you would just get caught? What was being weird our people. Front of you, you think, or what does it mean? is that a weirdo was calling me weird does mean either it s. There was somebody perfect who called you where you may feel bad about it. There aren't any perfect people there. Only weirdos of a weirdo calls, you weird should that bother. You know that would be a sort of what a lesson would look like You can also call it the the basket case. Theory, the idea that everybody's a basket case or a weirdo. If you, if you got to know here are some of the things I will teach. I would teach kids how to develop. A talent stack Because, if you are good at something anything

Then you know you can begun assembly and that's really good as a protection. When you get criticized for other things, If you get criticise and you're not gonna, do anything. That's gotta stay. But imagine you knew you are good at a sport playing music being kind to people or whatever it is. But you know you gotta something because you practice more than other people. became good, I recommend that, just as protection against criticism cause, you got one thing to hang on to at least. I saw this quote as I was thinking about this on Twitter I don't know other loser first or if I have the words right, but something like us. You would care less about what others thought of you. If you knew how little they think of you at all, that's cycle. But the best things I've ever learned that hit you

care less about what people think of you. If you realize how little vain and think about you at all you're not even meaningful, I'll tell you where I learned that I've told the story before go ahead. Some laser work on my face tourism, spider means, and with the old laser treatments, it would make your face purple for weeks like it would look like you had a terrible accident, we lost a fighter, something where you got it and then they fight, but you never been in one before and for the first few days I thought man, I'm not gonna, go out in public. because I don't want anyone looking at me mean judging me and wondering what's up with me and then I just got such cabin fever. Us like our school, I'm gonna go them all. I remember walking around them all with with a face still like? I just lost due indemnified,

and I would look at people to see how they were being horrified by my existence. Nobody cared no even look twice. Nobody stared. Nobody asked me about it. Nobody cared And was at a special case, no people ogier. I can walk around naked and except for being illegal people, won't care and we'll talk about it, but they will care so, once you learn how little people actually care, then pending about you should be put in the same box that they have it wishes is unimportant, the least important thing value their life. Don't make an important in your life, didn't even matter to them and then of courses. The deal Carnegie method, for we have a deal with shame and embarrassment and the delta

message to sensually just makes you practice being embarrassed, so you do things you know will be embarrassing, such as giving you an embarrassing speech in front of the crowd, which is one of the exercises. Oral or doing something embarrassing in front of crab does not to be speech. So those are some of the things that could be on the class on handling prison broke Machiavelli's underbelly a twitter account Mchugh, Machiavelli's underbelly asked this provocative question. If you think that following the money is predictive, this is my set up for the question. He asked question following the money: how as China's economy fared relative to the rest of the world did they signal, We benefit financially from the pandemic relative to the rest of the world or did is seriously hurt our economy to the same extent,.

So I assume that the intent of this is to make us wonder if China did intentionally. And the idea is that if you follow the money and China somehow gained from it, then maybe they did, but if they did not gain from it. Well then, maybe it wasn't a plan that maybe just got out somehow the virus Here's a better, a question that I added to that tweet. The comment I said I'd better question will do this when the judge, for risk. Could China ever have reasonably expected, it was a good play to release a pandemic. What do you think. if you go back in time Is there any reasonable way that China could have said from a ring reward perspective. Cuz, you know not having the risk is right, you assume is pretty big. But could you either have reasonably done this intentionally if they thought

through the size of the risk, the size of the benefits could. Could you imagine that follow the money would have brought them to the point where they would release it intentionally. And Tom says: can I read minds know you can't read minds, so I'm asking you this? Is there anybody that you could put in that position? You would have thought it was a good idea, just any human, You don't have to be chinese. You don't have to be a chinese leadership, just any would any human make that decision now. There are lots of different humans, so somebody says yes, Heller, Hitler right

so crazy people would do you think that the government of China could be best described as rational or crazy what? What would best describe China's leadership, many of whom are engineers by the way, I'm nothing you that, but they are very, very high percentage of engineers and leader well, I don't think that China is run as a crazy country I think is run is a country that is laser focused on self interest. And we can respect that, I mean you don't have to like it, but you can respected, because people do operators Various countries actually probably work. Well that way they operate and self interest.

but they are very rational decision making country and you don't see much irrational stuff happening to you and be hard to think of your rational chinese policies, their cruel ones or ones. You know that you don't like, but not irrational ones. If you look at it through the lens, What's just good for China, so I would say the follow. The money hypothesis argues strongly against not in three hundred percent way. We argue strongly against the idea that anybody would have done this intentionally. There's. Nobody who understands economics would have done this intentionally unless they were crazy. So let me say that again there's nobody who understood economics who would have thought this was a good play, because the risk is so big and so on sizeable and

First, they had a look at the communists. They wandered on this without them. There's a moderate liberal, named Michel Chandler, realizing that, maybe everything she believed about. Progresses was wrong. Meaning that if you want to be nice to people, progressive policies might get you the wrong outcome, Scott, they did it for economics. Did you miss the entire conversation? Nobody would have done this for economics. That is one of his one category. I can speak up with some confidence. I do have two degrees that irrelevant, This question: nobody would do it intentionally for economics now, if you're, not an economist, you should talk to one gives. If you can find anybody. Let us find some

he's got an mba from a good school or a degree in economics and asked them if it looks like a good financial play for China to release a pandemic. You're not gonna, get able to say that. But if you talking to an artist or something they might say that short term, maybe well, The point is you couldn't calculate the short term or the long backed away this. This moderately Michel Taylor did an interesting tweets, red she says: here's what If you ask me about San Francisco, we have them. Liberal left wing, government and population in the country. We have a, thirteen billion dollar budget and we have a thousand p. Sleeping in the rain this week? Can someone please explain this to me and then she goes on in the threat.

Talking about how her prior impression that the progressive would be better for the under glass appears to be wrong, and there may be some. These are my own now to try to capture the theme of it, but there may be some tough love more close to what the right would suggest, maybe a little closer to the the kindest thing you can do: if being kind to people is what you want. The progressives may have the wrong solution now it. I don't know if she is factored into this, how many people actually don't want to be in a home cuz? They want to do drugs instead,. But see her awaken like this is interesting and you get toward the end of the tweets red and you find out that she just she's reading, she's, writing she's reading Michael Shell, burgers new book San friend Sancho and which is huge bestseller.

And so you can see her being persuaded in real time. You can actually watch her being transparent about her thought process being modified by that book than it did. I tell you that Michael Shell Berger is persuasive. It you're saying it everywhere, these very persons and part of his appeal that you can't tell what political Zionism It's just unfathomable, because you just does things that make sense and have some kind of data were scientific backing, and you can't tell what is up to because it just looks like a bunch of good ideas, backed by solid argument and data.

We'll see here is a thought. Big farmers creating an economic agenda to make all humans forced to be consumers in their products are much more financial incentive. Do you need well that would be the farmer companies, but we're talking about China's government. So if you're asking me Do I trust big farmer, I think big farmer is, should be a category in which we assume guilt until proven innocence with four big farmer. I think you should approve assume guilt until proven innocent were.

As I wouldn't say that about mostly by think the given the size of the risks with any kind of medication and the history of the industry. It would be a rational to think otherwise. Nuts, of course, why you do the randomize control trials, yet the pandemic caused every strong economy, the shadowy sub China's, but it also turn people against China. So as much as anything, it will be the reason that the United States searched migrated Spaniel factory at other, so I don't think they could have known. That was a good idea. They would have known that was risky and China is now the super risky country like China. Tens do not take risks, so does it makes sense that the country most famous for not taking risks

took the biggest risk anybody had ever taken. As a country I mean, maybe Heller took a bigger risk, but special case. Yes in order to get rid of tromp now nothing. I don't think that was a big enough reason. Why do you keep them? randomize control trials? Are the only method capable of demonstrating causality? Actually I don't say that, because even the randomized control trial doesn't demonstrate causality doesn't check me on. Were randomize control trial doesn't tell you causality right, does it it tells you correlation? Doesn't

And then you have to use your judgment or something like it to determine whether it was causal causality was involved, have hasn't or advice, courage or trial Urban duplicate- the answer is yes, but this is a valid question. Randomize trial is about causality, and I know that the point of randomize control trial is to determine court possibility, but it doesn't do that. It just guess she club

Right, I guess all the more you use it. Doesn't it doesnt complete the distance? It just gets you close enough that your judgement has to suffice for the rest. All right, so that's all I got for today. No doubt the best show that's ever been broadcast anywhere at anytime and when does Trump stop making news again a big assed. I think that, no matter what whether he runs for office or he creates a platform to influence politics, his instinct is to stay in the news and he's good at it.

Scott plenty of people chose the option there. More afraid of that is less convenient right. They did a cost, benefit analysis, everybody, let everybody to them. All right, let a verse. I talked about the members, so I thank you for reminding me bullet. I said what I want to say about that guy. I just want to tie the men aversion to the simulation and into the virtual. EL the stuff Trop has compromised by big former. You know, I doubt that I doubt that I feel I trump might be one of the few people you can depend on not to be compromised by big.

only because he's never had an association with him before that, I'm aware of, and it will be obvious and I don't think, he's a fan and he's a skeptic. What's that in all caps, are you yelling at me A good business move for big farmer, Disport COMECON spread all the problem. Is you don't wanna, be the one who says COMECON safe you unless you make less, you can handle Leah the blow back. But I also use here somebody official like an expert- you don't want to go, so far as this is safe or even to recommend it. Instead of a vaccination without they'll be risky. I think.

What about the? I, don't I don't know spray solution discussed and Joe Rogan. Well, I don't know about that, but I do know that the idea of spraying- something it's a. U knows, to kill the viruses. Obviously there has been talked about a lot. They don't know that unless you were doing it on the regular, wouldn't all the virus, reportedly pretty quickly. Maybe that's a question for a doctor, Alaska question. When I took the doktor drew. I think I'm scheduled to talked him tonight. So look for that and. I don't think it's bleach, but it does make sense that clearing. Your nose would get rid virus. I just. Nevertheless, our is an hour.

So I use I use a mouthwash several times a day. Probably they use it usually related to my other habits. But I wonder if I wonder if you did a test of people who used just a regular mouthwash five times a day about the odds of covert, are lower or were better outcomes. Closer viral load was lower. God the author of the simulation. You would only need God for the original species and after that everything else would be people so Even if there is a God for the simulation is unlikely that year and one of the ones created by the God directly,. What did they worked so hard to withhold? I reckon you know.

let me go, let me ask you and the council, which is worse you or your heads rat. So before I give you my updated opinion, how Many of you think that in the end we will learn. The ivory action would have work if we ve gone Gung ho and done an early and all that. we think that they were saying mostly asses some knows, but mostly asses on locals about over here, Youtube Umsuka mix got real, got real quiet and new to them. More knows any asses. Nationally, though, even hear somebody, I never saw this coming Scott likes masks and China. I don't know what fucking thing you're watching, but I'm gonna make you go away.

Goodbye saw I'll give you my most current taken over mountain. I dont rule it out. If you, if anybody says to me, there was a global conspiracy to to suppress something they worked because it was cheap. let people sell vaccines. I would say: there's nothing about that. That's impossible, because there's a mechanism for it in the mechanism would be that the former companies would only have to get to a few experts which we know they can do and have done them as a routine thing. You get to a few experts Those few experts define what is real and what is not. Then everybody else's falls alive because most And she's we're just following the United States worthy, so

remember what am I a national objections was. Are you telling me that there is no country anywhere where they ve tried it, and then we can know for sure if it weren't nowhere, there's not one place that they tried it and I work. Then people come up with all the places that it was tried in it didn't work, but they believe it dead, including India. Peru is a few more the people imagine worked, but if you actually look at the current numbers, there's no indication of it now that doesn't mean it doesn't work under saying that the country examples were not real, but they look real lot of people in Japan there's another one. That's not real! It's all of the country ones are not real, but you'd have to do. If you want to test that for yourself, just Google, the country and ivermectin and debunk all the debunks pop right up, and it's just data, just look at the data: it's not there.

Now my current takers, although it is completely possible, the big foremost suppressed over makin and that it may be a did, were totally possible. I think every day they go. by that the reason some Rogue city country County there it's the same thing, a lotta. You guys do, which is definitely works and were being fooled. You don't. There was one hospital ones, city, one county, anywhere in the world where We have the same opinion that almost all of you have, which is that were being fooled and probably works I say as possible: I think you could get. Ninety percent, like you, could suppressant ninety percent,

but given that most of you think it's bullshit, the suppression of it. I think the majority of you said that you don't believe that it doesn't work. Given that I don't see any chance we could have got to where we are without at least one hospital using it and saying hey. Two years nobody's died here says like that: one ass little now there their individual doctors who have tried it, but that's not a standard. I would use because new ninety nine percent of the doctors patients are going to survive no matter what they do. Zones is not dangerous.

Wire doctors still prescribing it well, the same reason that their proscribed here for the same reason that I'd be tempted to take it, because you don't know, there's plenty of studies that are not quite as high quality issued want, that indicated might and the risk is low. So that there's no, MR there's no mystery about why doctors prescribe. It is just risk men. That doesn't sell your works, yet no one died is too high standard for a worked yeah I mean you shouldn't. Take that as an absolute. No one. You're, all all the stories you hear about, there's a country that solves the problem with acts. None of them are too, if any,

country had solves recovered problem by doing acts, whatever access be over. We just all they do an ex by next week and be over so now that in Heaven Scott people should be banned from talking about it. Yeah you now, I dont know of it. Work, though, because there's there's two questions, I would agree with you that free speech requires that those things not be banned. What I'm not sure of is if it worked from the perspective of the people abandoned another words. Did it make it more likely that you would avoid it and get your the more approved treatments? I know that doesn't mean you should do it, but it might work.

what is the vaxxed survival rate better than ninety nine point. Eight, the last numbers I saw is that the vaxxed survival rate is this: something like ninety percent better than the Unvaxxed once you get to that, but that's after you're already pretty sick. I think think that's how it works. How do we know that? Well data which we dont trust, Blake Jamieson, says you, you disappoint me more and more, every Blake, let me give you a little test here of your cognitive dissonance. I want Blake Blake Emerson. I challenge you know your next comment state. What you think. I believe that you disagree with Blake you're on, should take it if I miss Blake's common

alert me to it go now. The challenge is to say something: that's not obviously cognitive dissonance, which would be you stating an opinion for me that I clearly don't hold see. If you can do that that you can Now, there's a reason: why can't did? Did you just disappear or is there a delay here if ever had the forgotten and now. Why are most african countries and many in Eastern Europe totally ignoring covered? Well, they ve lack of co. Morbidity would be my guest. So the the average age in Africa was just pick Africa. The average age is way under the normal. The average await way younger the amount of time they spend in the sunshine way more.

So if everything was exactly the way we expected, Africa could look exactly the way it works without any without any mystery. Their little Miss Blake's comment: Gay Bobo, let's go back like bleak bleak, replete, bleak,. Dammit, where are you all right? You believe that you're thinking is above others know Blake. I don't know how much more clearer I can be we're all guessing or how many more times I can say it away. Did I make my case

when you see the people say stuff like you, disappoint me and you're wrong about everything. They almost never have a clear understanding of what might be news as says sorry,. He is right about that. So when I say that were all just guessing, you make your rational decisions does not cover everything. Now I didn't write a book and Halloo think well, which is very critically praised, so you, if you're, telling somebody that they that they're, not good thinking. You should probably talk to somebody you didn't

right, the best selling book on how to think them. That would be a good start. So now do I do. I think that I think better than other people. I think that I think it meaning that you can see lots of examples of it. For example, public Let me now Duncan him anymore. I guess I got for now and I will talk to you all soon.