To the best. Damn thing that ever happened to you, it's called coffee was got atoms, and not only is it the best thing that ever happened to you, but amazingly it gets better. Every time he thought rising and if you take it up another level, all you need is a government or a glass of tanker gels, asylum, anti drug of less a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee, enjoy. We now for them parallel pleasure, the dopamine the day the thing that makes everything better it's gone, the simultaneous and watch it do, it's magic now go you're right. I should have said beverage, not liquid beverage. I appreciate the good Well happy and is everybody

celebrating, Martin Luther King Day and some appropriate fashion, which would be don't really know, maybe sleep extra so that you do Can I have a dream. I don't know exactly. What is the traditional way to celebrate all holiday, but maybe you do. Rasmussen S question appropriate to the day. do you believe that men and women of all races have equal opportunity which of course, was Martin Luther King stream? How many people do you think in the Rasmussen and ball, I agree that men and women at this moment have equal opportunity. Answer is about a third thirty. Four points, As I said to myself, what here? They living in our world

one third of the country think that we ve solves that, though we have equal opportunity. We're not even really close. Are we if you. Talk to you. Black person who asked the question? Do you have equal opportunity sure they can give you some solid examples of now. Don't you think now there are plenty of places where things do work out and play a places. Precisely advantage fortune five hundred company might be actively recruiting minorities, women, eligibility, Q, southern their pockets of inequality. Pretty much everywhere. So to imagine that there is equal opportunity, I think is weird, because a clear places where even why people are being discriminated against, specifically that binding administration,

I say that if you're white, you might go the back the line for therapeutics and vaccines now. As I said, there will be a long list of things that every minority what's a while years, our list That would be a lot on that list is true, do agree with it, but precisely the most productive way to look at it? All of these and something you'd ever achieve. There's nobody will agree what it looks like nobody knows what quality, what equality looks like we just argue about. It is a little bit subjective. here's, here's a better frame does: do people have equality of strategies, Opportunity feels like we build: have the same opportunity for the same job, for example, but I think equality of strategy makes more sense.

In other words, can I find the strategy there were leverage the fact deny me white. Guy, probably, you're, probably find a way in the United States to take advantage of the fact that on a white guy, but if our black could I also on the strategy, a different strategy there give me an edge worrying black, and the answer is yes about women Yes, I'll bet, you do yes, yes there is definitely a strategy this available for everybody, it's a different strategy them, and maybe you could argue there not quite- is awesome one dollar life. That needs weird comments today.

It's weird that people think that we have equality. We will never lad that, but we certainly could have equal strategies or at least strategies are good enough. Now here's a shocker- I don't know if many of you know this might be the first time you hearing it by Bernie Sanders is not good at economics. I know I know I was surprised to as Michael Schoenberg points out that Bernie Sanders and Bill Mckibben separately and maybe simply convince new englanders that they didn't need nuclear natural gas and so now the region is getting twenty five percent of its electricity burning oil and desperate The importing liquefied natural gas from the Caribbean by ship,

Now the problem of courses are having a cold snap. So the problem with the latter, the green energy sources, with the exception of nuclear, which is green is that the other ones are not consistent. Little then little tell you exactly what they get and give you, and when, and so another example where Bernie Sanders is amazingly nocturnal economics. I now, I thought I'd start with the shocking stuff. Richard Grenell had an interesting observation in the dogs not barking Category any tweet, this. He said that the intelligent leaks, the intelligence leaks, have stopped at

One was the last time you were a story about an intelligence leak or a White House insider. It completely stopped didn't I think of any stories like that and then goes on. He says play points to the partisan credibility problem of the leakers does and their allies in the media. He says remember when they return and they will return there D. enemies. Well, you're, not like there framing of domestic enemy yeah I get frame that way as well, but. This observation is quite on point. Suddenly, suddenly people don't sick boy anything you wondered about the the deep state. feel like is answered by this alone

the leaks are so damaging indefinitely happens to one party That does tell you something about whose running the stuff How many of you saw Jordan Petersen Interview Red ones do other words at other hair. On evolution. I would recommend a highly as like one of the most fastened my pronouncing array of story of memory Gimme the proper pronoun, because I know I'm getting by getting both of their neutron Hieing hieing. Ok, in his first those other eyeing apologies to all people whose names I say wrong- but I got to say.

that when you see Jordan, Petersen and bread- and it has had the right. when you see them talking at. The level that they can talk about smart stuff. It is actually just this kind of thrilling. Actually, and I don't know if you'll have this exactly the same yeah, I don't think you. I don't know if you have exactly the same experience, but The two things are remarkable about all three of the participants: one is They have your deep knowledge of their subject matter, the other is that you will not find better communicators. Oh my god, because year, if you ve got the university professor experience on top Subject matter, oh my god they form sentences on the fly to it watch them put,

together a coherent or of sentence. Was there a coherent structure of sentences to give a complete answer. Do something without a wasted word, its dislike amazing Just as a writer I couldn't get over Heather their verbal capabilities, you're so stellar, but on top of that, they were talking about a missing part in evolution. I'm gonna do a bad job of explaining what they explained. but it does look like there might be something closer to intention. This is my own interpretation other. Something closer to intention. The striving evolution. No one way that that intention could be expressed is in sexual preference, as in I'll make up my own example here, so don't don't blame them for anything I say about it, but

exposure, a jury, who wanted to get to the taller leaves, but it couldn't reach with that draft. If it were female with the female draft. Look for a mate with a toddler neck, because the DRC The intention is to get up to those leaves, but it can't do indirectly, so does I just can express to the sexual preference, then future generations reach the leaves done up. I mean us again. This is not coming directly from the experts are putting my own sort of speculation into the mix, but What there does seem to be some mystery about was driving things and I think that's pretty pretty fastening. are February. One is coming up only two weeks, subway the public is done, thus the date that we would love for everybody to be free of mass

now, usually when I say that I get a bunch of people pouring, is say: Scott Gasket. I've been done for a long time. I have not worn a mask a long time and if you cowards, are still mass well, that's on you, just don't get don't bring. Into this, I stopped a long time ago. to which I say, I don't think you'll my state cause Buying groceries without mask and least you could try, but you're not going away groceries away, so I bet. I feel that all the brave people who bought this system, Livin States or local locales, where they didn't have any mass, but they bravely they bravely went where they didn't need to have masks without masks. I salute you, but for those of us who are still an oppressed regions and just to get along until is over

limit. Let me give you a report from my idiot part of the country. Now I have to admit I do normally go through life thinking that the people I live around. in the Bay area, Silicon Valley very high. Education levels, her very high education levels, what tend to think that People around here, just little smarter than the average. Guess unbiased by the jobs they haven't. The kinds of occasions I have however, I am here to report as the middle of January and twenty twenty two something like half of my fucking Idiot community, is wearing masks outdoors alone,.

In twenty twenty two in MID January outdoors alone, masks on about half of the fucking Idiot public. I just amazing. Now there Two things going on one is: you can get used to anything about this all the time, even things that are outrageous at first, you can sort of just get used to which is not good use, two things that are not good, for you and I feel like a lot of people just don't even notice anymore more they leave the store they leave their house or wherever maybe that a reasonable around the first place, I feel like people just forget, because I have I've actually just forgotten. You like what a walk from these supermarkets, my car and I'll, keep my mask on for another five minutes. Well, I'm a loading, the groceries.

It is not because I am in danger, I just I literally just forgot yes, sometimes because it's called, if you play Mask on what is called, actually really helps I've actually left. My mask on. If I went outdoors and it was called like, oh was masses go there. But then there is also the I think, is the social singling. Mostly, though you, I think it's your social signal, I don't think there really afraid, but I don't know, maybe The brainwashing is Fear is so bad that there actually afraid outdoors people. I think you spoke by the arm across, like can go everywhere. Look at you. Well here's one observation. The local businesses are largely done with mask mandates. is that true, where you live

you're a chain business, you gotta, do a corporate tells you and there still gonna, enforce it. If I go into the Safeway they're gonna Course masks, but if you go into a local own business telling whose to put mascot anybody Because all the local owned businesses have people network masks with people who are, but I've never seen a local business. Tell somebody put a mask out of you I think I would I think I will ever see a local business. Do that serve Europe. Jim or your local restaurant here, it's it's got of optional at this point, so the change, will be the hurdles. Now. My estimate is, it would only take ten percent non compliance, masks to end it wherever there are still mandates would you agree with the estimate if ten,

Other people just walked into wherever you have to have a mask without one. and just politely said o o, ok, you're gonna requirement under the mask but makes them come and talk to you just people This is our comeback. Another time when you don't require it or Also, all I've got a mask at my back and open run. but just give them a little bit of friction. Ten percent of their customers consistently when masterless, how soon be the staff would give up but an hour they take about an hour, they will give up right away because they I worked in it is the last thing I care about. Let me ask you this deal Anybody who masks home Within their own house, you know anybody who does it. I can't think of any value mass, the home.

I mean in the beginning of the pandemic service people would mask but if somebody comes in my house, the first thing I autonomous their welcome to take off their mask and that's been for a long time. and about your kids are reaches. Not mixing with other kids after school on weekends while the others gives wearing mask, sets or sleep overs, there's no mass going on a lesson being watched? The public has completely stopped masking unless there being watched as soon as you get behind closed doors. The mask yes, replied off. At least us wait is here. Now you there may be some ass places as different. here are a couple of persuasion. Lessons number one deep always more persuasive. than the original claim. Will you agree with that

if you, if you're, not an expert yourself They hear somebody make a claim by you, really evaluate it. You're, not an expert or you don't have the information we hear the debunk. Does the debunk. usually sound better than the claim, yet, not always right is. This is usually situation, but in terms of bias you're, not certainly, but just in terms of both So I'm definitely not tell you to believe all the debunks, but here is a problem. Have you ever seen a debunk get debunked? I think yeah right what happens when the debunking yes do, but does that make the first debunk actually look weaker than bulk is turtles. All the way down. Can you keep debug the debunk and then debunking the lively bunker debunk forever

and that the lastly, you say will be the most convincing. Yes, it turns out. That's exactly you can do and the reason this probably the big reason. then, in the jury, trial, the defence, the scan your last right because It's just so well understood. Whoever goes last, as can have an advantage. In the same way that a first impression is sticky, the last Somebody tells you can be pretty stick you do so beg your fair for the defendants. The defence of his guests at last so we're looking at these claims of of anything in science or about the pandemic. Whatever the problem that the claims sounds good on a surface, but then the deep. ass? I was burning and but then the debate- ITALY bunker. Let me give you an example. Can we agree I'd like to stipulate? Would you well, I guess you have to know

My case, the number of people were accusing me of being in the pocket. Big farms. Do you think I'm in the pocket of big form, I've disclosed my investments by suppose I haven't done in writing, so maybe you could doubt it so the only big Pharma stock that have owned was regeneration. and that was just for a few months and I took my gains and got out. So I've never owned any. The vaccination companies accept as a component of an index fund. So it's passive kind of will not pass. Is just and in these super fuel, so so I don't have any kind. Thing in their nobody's? Pay me to do it blah blah blah my business model rewards me been wrong as well as being right,

if I can teach you something by being wrong and be good content. So I really don't have the incentive to a liar be biased that some people would now that doesn't may be unbiased right, doesn't work that way. Everybody's got. Somebody unbiased, I just don't have any the obvious ones. at whatever my biases, maybe consistency, everybody s, consistency by us, everybody has an ego bias. We all want to be right, even though my business model would reward me the way. So celebrity I'm going to talk about any topic they love to hear about, but I don't care about the truth of it. I'm going to talk about the how we, how we process it right, and the topic is over makin but let me tell you, I don't care if it works like I really care How we figure out if it works, and I'm going to add something to what you ve heard before.

but I'm not here to argue other works because I think it makes any difference same with masks. way past, be useful to argue whether they work because there are just gonna, go, I'm not worried about dying of of covered so we don't know if you can come, beyond this journey. But I don't want to talk about whether works. I only want to talk about how we process the knowledge here's my taken little background. First of all, more sceptical. You are the more gullible you appear, those who are less skeptical. That doesn't sound immediately obvious? Why that's true right so my claim is against all common sense that the most sceptical person Willoughby

You are to be the most gullible to people who are less skeptical. You'll need an example of that right, because that doesn't make sense on the surface here's a sample. I would say that you put the EU the audience correct me. If I'm wrong would not trust big farmer or we same page, I don't trust big farmer, you don't trust big form now. do you distrust the more than I do Well, I would say that big farmer would kill people for money and even may be millions of people for money. Do you think you trust and less than that. I think we all agree that. they will kill millions of people for money. So am I so far on the same page, the unjust that question were rule roughly equally skeptical.

I don't. I don't believe what this the big farmers I don't believe any of the data believe. They have our interests in mind and I do is that they will kill millions of people if they can make a profit they they would. persuade themselves that they weren't really doing that so easily could happen. Now. I would go one level deeper in my scepticism than that. Do you believe the big farmer which would be less a typical of a big company, there's no I believe that a farmer would be more efficient or better managed Then any well managed company in any other industry how much if you believe the big farmer could exert so much troll over messaging and reality that they could make some

such as over MAC them disappear from use almost completely and an coerce the entire technical community. the disappearance, here's an argument to how that could easily happen. If only got to american exports than other countries would probably fallen line. Does a they did. Take the lead from America. A lot of stuff that makes sense, it is also true that they could bribe just a few people, just a few experts, and that would be enough to convince the other american experts who would just parent what the first expert said, and then that would be enough to spread everywhere and then they could work. with their their vessels in social media and the news.

And that, if somebody did say hey, I think they're lying to us. They could get a squash down by. They can be disappeared by the algorithms and then the news would just not talk about the other alternative points of view. So would we would we be on the same page skeptically there Farmer would have all of those tools available. They could control social media can control the news. they can control enough experts to control american exports to control, international experts, who would disagree with that? Nobody right. Now. Am I just as sceptical as you are so far? Will I've done yet, but what we talked so far. Are we equally skeptical? I think we are, Let me take a little bit deeper, Jim

We that a big entity like that which would no doubt have many witnesses to such a crime crime that would be in size roughly, The size of the Holocaust, so if big farmer Worse, suppressing a a cheap available cure with the crime baby. I say roughly the size of the Holocaust the sailor of course, six million souls. Five million have died from covered so far. And if you imagine that might have taken some ramp up, if I ever or something else worked here, it also be more DAS. Let's say. something in the neighbourhood of the Holocaust would be the size of the crime. Would you agree? that so far there is doubt this is I'm not saying this is true. I'm saying that if there were this global conspiracy, it would be Holocaust sized do you.

that there's nobody smart enough or done enough, who would be aware of this evil who wouldn't try to monetize it cause, I don't I'm a little more sceptical than you are about this. I dont believe accompany could be, so efficient because remember, I created the Dilber Comic based on the observation that companies or a hot mass They can look efficient from the outside. but not on the inside. On the inside. Every companies are mass. I will confirm that by every single person who worked at any big company, there will be no disagreement of that statement. Every big companies a hop on the EU side now? Do you believe that in that soup of different personalities and hot mass you could not produced by now, because some time is gone, bye, bye?

you don't think, there's somebody who would be aware of this great I've respecting conspiracy, You don't think even one of them would have found a way to monetize their knowledge. Let me tell you how go to my party If anybody has that secret knowledge go to my publisher, or any major publisher and say I Shall we do have the insides story and I can prove it that we suppressed over mountain while knowing it work but deal millions. millions how about going on Europeans, podcast teasing Joe Rogan would book you as a guest. If you and worked for one of the big vaccine cup, And you said you know, I was actually in the room were mark or somebody else,

I was in the room and they did say we're going to hide this thing and we do know it works, but we can make more money. The other way. Do you think Joe Robin would book that guest. Of course, do you think I would talk about it? of course. Do you think Jim Poor will talk about it, of course, Do you think areas re people I mentioned around the take nope? I doubt it. I don't think so. I mean I'd, be real surprised and pressure no myself, so that's one of the three and I'd be real. I am about the other two so you have an easy path for somebody to become a savior. Let me ask you this: of course, you're worried about being destroyed by big farm right. If somebody, if somebody came forward, you would be destroyed by big farmer.

Would you do it anyway? I would you wouldn't know Would you be so afraid of big farmer? The wooden save millions of lives, hero of the pandemic. millions and speak fees and book deals really Somebody mentioned oxy content. and how long there was. There are bad behaviour, went on, I would argue that they got to hide because they do not have as much scrutiny. If you're just another company with another product, you can hide pretty well because you're not a lot of eyeballs on you but in and the death would be in the ones in Toulouse, and it would be hard to sum up the des. Like you, it was hard to notice. The oxy carton was killing so many people because nobody was keeping the stats, but,

Can you imagine a holocaust size crime? When everybody's. Looking for that exact crime, not we would do we know exactly who the perpetrators would be. It would be the big farmer, companies but the entire world and all the experts in it. Are looking at it and we're looking at their data. Under those conditions, do you think that any company could be competent enough to hide a holocaust size crime? when well. Let me use this question: are all asking directly in the comments. If you in the position to be the whistle blower, but the Only downside is a big pharma would come after you. Would you blow the whistle go. Would you blow the whistle or would you be afraid and let millions of people die.

you expect some people to say now, I wouldn't that's actually pretty reasonable in terms of self interest. I wouldn't criticized but the truth is humans- are all over the map and if you have enough witnesses, you get everything. If you have, witnesses you get every outcome. People don't want. Other people do all talk I think that enough time has grown by the very sceptical. Any big company could be this ruthlessly efficient without, and imagine they could get away with it, because, The lesson of the actual content story is that they got caught. The lesson isn't that you could get away with it forever the lesson is best case scenario: you can get away with it temporarily, don't You think that if any executives actually did what this accusation is, they will be killed. Now, when I say they would be killed, I don't mean

would be executed by the state. I mean there Be treated the A nazi Holocaust prison guard will be treated when the camp was liberated. If you know what I mean, I don't think they went on trial. If you know what I mean, I think the public will actually kill them. That said, the risk of the of the big farm executives should they have been involved, a holocaust size crime which is exactly the accusation. That's the accusation that they were involved in a Holocaust eyes, crime. We would kill them. Am I right the only way they could ever not be killed by the public is if the legal system protected them first and your governments to some kind of protective custody. The moment the power I found out, and we would eventually right there.

Away. You could hide this crime for five years. Ten years, do you think, do you think this kind of crime could be hidden for ten years I may, even though the African was because nobody was looking for that crime. Somebody says yes, yes in the sense as possible, but but with so much attention on this topic. I think it is so so I would say I'm more sceptical than you on the efficiency of big companies, but it's a subject. It's a subject Right, you would say none ass God, I'm more sceptical in you, because I think they're so evil. But do you believe they're so efficient? I don't You do there really really. You think so that efficient.

I believe that the people have worked for large companies would say now. Oh actually, let me do it. Let me do a quick bull. If I may, could we agree just for the collective entertainment of all of us. Just the people have experienced Large companies do large companies have the skill to pull off the size of a holocaust crime and get away with it in perpetuity. Just the people work for big companies, I see a wall of knows they are not capable of doing so. If you dont have they come experience looked to the people. Do doesn't mean right. I mean that's, not confirmation anything, but I would take them seriously because sort of a all, people say now they're, not that cut them.

And I was remember the the differences that everybody's looking nobody's looking for the crime than they are all that competent and it any big they can get away with a crime the nobody's looking for, I came up with a new way to do this. At the sitting? I called binary syndrome, which is where people with opinions that don't fit the two teams they they get to snap to guide Have you ever software that has a menu choice called snap to guide? It means you, you take her object, you're moving on your screen, you get a near a guideline that cost you have just snaps to it so you don't have to figure out exactly what lining up its snaps to the guide you put there. Well, that's what it feels like when people see my opinions, if they they can sniff the

opinion, has any kind of a sense of leading in one direction they snap to guide and then than there dumb, thus Sir entire thing you process snapped a guide. So the binaries. binary syndrome and see. yet the sort of thing exactly the same time. Whilst waiting to debunk debunk Somebody was online criticising me for never debunking that debunk so could actually be, people will accuse me of doing of not doing the same. Then I'm doing exactly the same time where they are. like right, where they are undoing the thing you're not doing anything, No wonder thing right now you don't do the same. Well, look over here, I'm doing the thing and it is like a cognitive blindness is just incredible. I'll. Give you the example that exactly.

But on the plus side I a twitter and save me a lot of time and energy costs You know how much energy it takes to figure out your own priorities and come up with your own opinion as hard slot. We don't need that anymore, because I can just go on twitter and peace, We'll tell me what I'm thinking and what my priorities are, for global. Today I learned from someone else on twitter. that I'm not interested in the truth honestly, I thought I was better than that. I hoped I was interested in, but until I read this tweet from a total stranger who has access to my inner thoughts and now I know, I'm not interested in the truth, which is very disappointing honestly, I lowered by opinion of myself when I learned this, because it's amazing how you can be fooled, but just don't have any interest in the truth.

and thank you, stranger, first trading, that up for me is to certain it is so here is my snapped a grid problem. I Is that the there two camps one camp says I actually works and its being suppressed by big former. The other camps, as I remember him, doesn't work There is there's no suppression going on whatsoever. My opinion is not one of those My opinion is, in all likelihood at least based on incomplete data. There is no evidence that I'm convinced, respect and works, but. Farmer is trying to suppress it. So there are two reasons that big farmer would want to suppress. Iver makin. One reason is that it works

the reason is that it doesn't work the sea. Am I right those there would be two reasons to suppress over Makin one because it worked and they didn't want to compete with it and the other, because it didn't work and they didn't want to compete with it. Do you see that they would have to equally very compelling reasons to kill? I respect him one of their worked. I wondered it didn't work because you would be competing with it whether it worked or not, and then it. Why would they want to compete with it? So just the fact that they're squelching, it doesn't tell you anything about whether it works. I don't know you does you could confirm that are trying to stop it, maybe but thou. until you whether worked so thus the person.

I know that's another. The other thing that I've been hearing a lot is the doktor, whose they treated one of them treated five hundred patients. This is what I heard yesterday with. I reckon five hundred patients nearly every one of them recovered almost one hundred. So that's that's pretty good, and then there was another. Doctor who treated two hundred and twenty patients are so with ever met him and every one of them had a good result and of a hundred and twenty. convincing. Now the same doktor reportedly treated him. Off with I remarked and when he got it, it didn't work at all, for him didn't work for it. It has friends in this close associates. Will you tried it with them, but for all people who took it and then left his office and never reported back work perfectly.

So this was called anecdotal science is very compelling. Now I I compare this to another trial, I did a trial on my own. It was I tried praying for all the people that those doctors were treated. And also all the other people in the world who have covered. I only there for twenty four hours I didn't like it wasn't day after day, such What do one day a praying people were infected with covered, would recover Let me tell you how I did, and I am proud of this- I need nine percent of the people. I prayed for full recovery. Ninety nine percent, and I know you thank you. Thank you that the natural recovery rate is actually Ninety nine point: seven percent-

So there is some indication that I prayed to the wrong God, because I believe I may have killed over a million people by. Pray? So I only got a ninety nine percent effective this rate when doing nothing at all would give you ninety nine point. Seven apparently, but still I think to consider this as part of the anecdotal sites now, I sent around a debunk I've remarked there was in the BBC and then somebody suddenly debunk of the BBC's Deepak. but I also sent a fact check the debunked I've reacted. And then somebody sent me a debunk of the fact check. Well, what the hell am I gonna do now so the causes- or I could be an idiot I never rule out that possible.

So how do you know of the deed is better or not? Well, to tell you what claims are, and then the debunks and I'm not the claim that the claim is right or that to debunk right. If you can allow me to be divorced from what's true, because I don't think we can solve that to just talk about how we process and So suppose you heard that there were out of seventy two studies sums twenty six by a whole bunch of studies. There are dozens of studies that collectively, if you look at him together. They indicate that I respect and works is convincing. So there are some experts who have actual credentials, they say it works. There are people who use it and say it works And then there are dozens of studies, the say works, so less acclaim, it's pretty convincing. Would you would you

If that's all you ever heard was those things be pretty convincing now, then you say but the big farmers as it doesn't work, then you say of course I too, of course, I said it doesn't work. That doesn't mean anything, I'm still convinced at work. People say doesn't work are not credible, but then the. and says it doesn't work and you say, wait a minute. The government always lies to us. That does mean throw leather still believe the claim. But what about the other experts? The other experts say it doesn't work. They ve been wrong, The rogues say it does work and they ve got really good credentials. Not only that, but you gotta Studies essay works. You got doctors that use, to say it works. I believe the claim, is that where many of your did describe were many of your where are you are roughly in your current thinking.

obviously the essence and snows so What the debunk looks like our then The claim is- and this is- stronger. The claim that it actually has worked in places like Israel, in one area within India, utter product cash and they totally crushed it. men, some other places. So then you the debunk endless, look at utter Pradesh place as good example goes Doktor Malone, one of the proponents of Ivory Mechlin, just tweeted, showing these that there was an actual guide and little packet, let included I've Rebecca and for that area and he was, he was asking for an apology, because he was he had made the claim that they got utter that they got I in that region and crushed the Danish says that the DAS went down to practically nothing so

here's. What Doktor Malonis, as proven he's proven that other product did in fact give I've reacting to his people, because it was an actual photo of the kid they got seemed break, it happens and that the data shows that the death rate from coal- We went to basically zero, that's pretty good! wouldn't you say anybody? Are you convinced yet I mean it's kind of adding up your dozens studies essay works? You got a lotta. There's a say: they used their networks. You ve got some credible exports, who say? Not only does it works in theory, working in the real world. Here's the region we prove their using it, and here is the data. We proved that their data that the death- want a zero. How many of you are convinced? The claim is valid, based on that

so is. That's all you heard it's this pretty darn convincing. I'd, have to say, but here is something you. Maybe you didn't hear now not saying, is true position This is just the debunk to somebody's gonna, debunks debunk. You know that right. Somebody will, for years, the debunk, as if a judge's your mind. in utter product during the time that there were zero euro covered US There were zero of any kind of das where's during that same time that nobody died of covered, nobody died of car accidents or heart attacks or murder, or anything because there was a data problem.

With death, and so the number one best example of I've remarked in working is very clearly not an example of that working cause. It didn't cure auto accidents, did it and so the people who look at the data say, but all the their gone too. So obviously is just a data problem so that The strongest real world example basic a way there other other places Israel, but actually that's not the point. So they're a bunch of other examples that are debunk the same way that somebody claim they used it, but if you look into it now now, then what about Japan somebody. Suddenly, a tweet just yesterday said a very highly highly like a cardiologist said that there are better, Innovation by some, your medical group and their medical groups have use. I format

In Japan was using it with great success, from an actual, respected cardiologist. Japan, whose tell you his own experience. Yes, we use it. Yes, we beat your win. We got the covert DES way down totally workin convincing right, pretty convincing. Whilst that's all you heard that would be darling commencing. Here's Are you didn't hear, but is the debunk to it. The death rate in Japan is just average average. Its average for the region? because all the asian countries are beating all of the western countries, then maybe some exceptions. Basically, there just average, so Japan is using it so successfully

Why don't their numbers reflective they're doing just same as everybody else and the other countries are not reportedly using so does that tell you that the Japan thing was bs? I don't know if I'd be a debug to the D block, just haven't heard up. Then the BBC Data is debunking, said that of the big trials of I've Rebecca. that a third of them they could identify obvious huge problems, one third of the ones they checked out of twenty six, and I guess there more than that. they check twenty sex and found a third of blood like really big problems and the the problems are data was Cotton pasted You could say that is not even real data. I obviously not real data. so that's how about some of them were. But you said yourself, bus got, there were also randomize control trials,

Apparently there was one highquality randomize controlled trial there, there are other trials that had quality problems? but there was one really good. One said it didn't work. Now. Are you against? Do you think a randomized control trial is convincing. A standard in science and according to the BBC, there was only one I decided and work. And the ones who said it didn't work have such released a random, a third of them. so tat were so so are we flawed. You couldn't possibly do a mega analysis cuz, it would just be taking an average of garbage Was there a debunk to the diva, of course, So somebody suddenly a

video c users expert. Probably wrote his name down here somewhere Doc, John Campbell? He doesn't videos he's as it is pro? I reacted. So easy looks at the BBC article, which totally debunked Iver Makin. Then he totally debunked the BBC article. No, he didn't prove it was false. Question: the capability of the people and the source. because the sources were mentioned in a number of cases and the and the people involved were not high authorities. So he basically said this is a journalism, is not science was convincing, he was does. The personally goes last is always go visit and if somebody working debunk him.

as I will right now, Actually, so incredible do here's my debunk of him. He questioned the sources and said that because he couldn't find what they found a question. It. Whatever you could trigger somebody into cognitive dissonance, they're gonna come after your data, but They're going to ignore the good arguments and go after you personally, Arthur. He caught them one after them personally, but he also had a good point. that their data was unfavourable accepted was on glaring exception to that, and I didn't see his whole video yet, but I think you can get to it. They aren't Who did claim that there is only one good study, randomize control trial, and then he said I from acting didn't work. I dont know they. He addressed that incorrectly but the debunked to him would be. I think you ignore them

strongest point and one after their credibility, because it would be easy. I think, to determine There was in fact one good randomize control trial. I think he could find that now is that did exist. Then the whole BBC article is garbage, of course, but right, don't trust gamble, don't trust the BBC, don't trust anybody? so keep in mind that the major seen here is that the last person sounds right and there's always the last person. You never done as always gonna be somebody responding to the response. So, if you He chase the turtles all the way down. Good luck! I can't but I would tell you that you might be nearing the end when you find somebody ignoring the best argument and going after the credibility of the Devon.

That would be a sign. You may have reached the final turtle, but I don't know that you could know for sure just sort of cheap that might arise So please at bottom line. I don't think you do matters if Overmastered works at this point we were so done with were so done with everything we ve got to eat. They get February one we're done workin for those of us in the horrible states like California, where we love masks and mandates and stuff. And what are you telling me eternal, analogies, thickest turtle analogy was excellent. There's then, of course, there will be less people who were dumping on me, forbade robust, Earl and one, of course, I'm not so watch

Many people are criticising me for the opposite of my personal opinion, The only people are accusing the creator, Dilber of being too gullible entrusting of big corporations, to me. Thus, the funniest thing that came out of the pandemic is that it People assume that I trusted big corporations maybe the silliest thing. That's happened out of all this. The only thing that I trust is that they were wrong every time. That's it! You. No matter how bad a big company is, sometimes they make a product that works. It's not like every product, every company made doesn't work so just because they're not trustworthy, doesn't mean that they made about.

product it just means is very likely does mean happened. Andrew says: did you roll up your sleeve for big Formless got well what'd, you do Andrew, What I did was weight as long as possible because I didn't trust their vaccine and ultimately I just did it so I can fly. But you trusted the Chinese, engineered by a weapon. So you trust the virus which maybe don't know for sure, looks like it could have been designed to hurry. You you, you trust the thing this designed to hurry you over the thing that was designed to protective, knowing that we don't know for sure whether was engineered

or whether the vaccine is more good than that in the long run. We don't know that in the short run, it looks like it's more good than bad for certain people. And by the way on Youtube, if you didn't catch my pride. a le move last night, when I tell you about the upgrade to science, a new form of science or like the new testament of science. But look for that is the video did right before this one, but last night the fake hostage situation I dont think, is fake, but is also not important that is all I have to say today and go Niners and all that and

are you suppose that there's only one bio up and on the shelf now? Why did doctors rightly in vain that getting nor your all caps Never aspire to be elaborate. Well, here's here, here's the thing. If the only choice was to give vaccinated or not, I would have chosen not to get there. Would you agree with me Only variable was vaccine or no vaccine. I would take no vaccine fair. But if you add the variable that you have a choice of two two unknowns. One might be it. These by eleven with long term consequences, we can anticipate. and the other one might be a vaccine with long term consequences. We can anticipate you'd, Give a choice

avoiding the experimental drug? Did you know you didn't you gotta choice, of which experimental drug or in which order you got them. I chose to get the protection before thee. Chinese engineered by a weapon, if you chose to get the Bio weapon first and then the protection Apparently there does have some benefits, but I will think it says good, just my guess now I don't know that for sure, but neither do you saw guessing.

there's a double chance of the unknowns. True to our nomes. I do like the fact that if I can do anything to reduce the amount of impact the alleged Chinese engineered by a weapon has on me, then I would do that. That feels like the better. The feels like the better play, with a context of so many unknowns. Did you get the job before the break? Suitcases were happily yes long before we

There were breaks in cases which wouldn't have changed my mind. I don't think because in I got it so I didn't die, or at least that was the gamble were making. I didn't get it so I wouldn't transmit it. I got it to stay alive. So still seems to work for that, allegedly, allegedly, the ratio of choice, the ratio of choice, world bothered by them.

All right, that's all you got to say for today you feel remorse for helping big farmer. Why would I feel remorse. Now, how many of you think I helped them by tell you that I wasn't Vaccinated for six months because at didn't the vaccinations avenue you people know that. How many people know that I waited for, I think, six months specifically because I didn't trust them. I said over and over and over again. I don't trust them. I don't trust him. I don't trust him. And then what I did I told you Now is the right answer, and I basically, if I, if I didn't, have to fly, I might have made a different decision.

So how does that sound to you like, like I helped them. I'm not sure that they would have paid me two way, six months, telling saying that I didn't check hair on train wreck I said I felt free ones, they vaccinate right. That was my subjective opinion, which still holds. Now, why would you have a problem with me? Tell you what I feel subjectively? Why is that threatening to that? I got the feeling when I got it, because those free of young worrying.

Really anything but an inconvenience after that vaccines and mandated to fly it was banned in its flight of Greece. So out of the country I think was mandated to get through Germany to get to Greece or something like that, but it was mandated somewhere along the way you did I have to fly less cracked. I could have gone and divorce right away. You right, I did have the option of not lying. I could have them doors. You are correct soap, thanks for pointing that out. That's all you got the job, the job and defended it. You got the job and defended it. What words mean to you, If I say there's other costs,

their benefits. In the end, I just guessed the sounds like it. I defended it. that's a weird use of words. But okay, okay, you know if you keep that up, you're going to be promoted to mascot, but that's all for now I'll talk to you tomorrow