I hope I didn't violated copyrights with that Perfect rendition of rob fallen. Well. I think you will recognise that signal on ok, I'll wait for the course that well, I think this is gonna, be the best thing I've ever seen in your life, lots of evidence for it lots of it, and you don't believe me, it you'll believe me pretty soon right. after a little thing. We call the simultaneous up if you'd like to participate. There's a couple more or less a tanker gel sustain canteen jirga, flask of vessel of any kind over the ephemeral liquid. I, like coffee, join me now for the unparalleled

Is the dope me the other day, the thing that makes everything better? It's called the simultaneous and you my lucky lucky listeners you're here, for it like good, is what a good data says. Go. I feel my dna being required, but in a constructive way. Well for those of you who are, Youtube, you may not be aware that I have a local community on the locals site. and people bears Subscription get to see me make these micro lessons. I call them

Usually, two to four minute videos that are designed to give you an actual useful life skill in the few minutes, so there are over two hundred. But the one I did yesterday, the locals people considered too valuable to be behind a subscription wall and I'm so glad they did and by the way. Thank you because after I had created, it was a. It was a micro lesson on reframing, stress and anxiety. It would be a bunch of little simple mental tricks and techniques and systems. They even variously incorporate to reduce your stress and anxiety. and the people locals thought it was I'm going to I'm going to over interpret what they said. They thought it should be on Youtube because it would have of value outside the subscription based

So as a philanthropic- and I guess it would be sort of weirdly indirectly philanthropic, the people are locals, who actually pay money for my content have decided that you should see it. So in this case the it's on Youtube. You can see the link to it. My twitter today so there's anybody any life who could benefit by reducing their stress and anxiety. That would be a bunch it Sarah that taken consume really easily and remember that the whole point of the short videos is just get right to it and give you something useful: here's them depressing thought of the day. Will you tell me if I'm just old man talking like an old man or if this is true- and I know everybody, my age is gonna- think it's true. So this is the worst crowd. I can arrest

this question for sanity track Irish Saturday Jack, please. What the hell is wrong with kids. what the hell is wrong with them. Can you imagine Your generation, if you're my if it was your my age, is, can you Your generation not having a mask rebellion seriously seriously. Did you think my generation would have put up with months and months of work, masks and school? I don't think so How long would have taken us to simply all of us throw them away what what would have the entire class through their mass. At the same time, what they closed the school, the what the hell are, they gonna do what happens if all the school, if ever bases are I love? You gonna put you Mass way, then you have to do zoom school,

happens if everybody says what I'm not gonna turn it on. I just I won't around my computer, I'm going to school and I'm gone without a mask. I'm MA am I Crazy, my crazy that my classmates in my school would have work this out in two weeks. I feel like I might be romanticizing my child a little bit. So that's where you have to stop me, but if I can be blunt, the fucking kids are above policies. You telling me that there's a bunch of fourteen seventeen year old kids who can get their shit together enough to tell their teachers to go fuck them and get the mass and just throw them away. Do you think they're pair are gonna put up the fight that will change their minds

all they have to do is do it at the same time is not rocket fucking sites. Do it at the same time nobody can get in trouble body, zero risk, zero fuckin risk if they just do it at the same time, And they can organise out have you heard of social media theirs. Called Snapchat Tik Tok. I believe, its away for young people to talk with each other, and you at work out a single day to throw your fuckin mass away? At the same time, it must be done with it. It's time, kids, it's time. did you lose all of your fight amid seriously but why? What is going on here, not not even been saying your: what is what

good or bad or when it should have happened, I'm just I'm just astonished that there's no fight left in kids. What happened is that the brainwashing or the change and diet? Sir? What So here's some tragic news for a company called Spotify who who made a huge mistake? working with the most popular podcast, her in the history of civilization, and now they ve lost, firstly, law. The area of funding bodies surnames you might have to google him and John Mitchell again. Google, her and now knows Lufkin apparently, but that's not the end of it. Mary trump she's remove in her part gas from Spotify. Now I know you're thinking Mary trumpet.

Podcast, but I dont know how Spotify gonna weather the storm. You know, and I have to say that, unlike the children, They do have a little fight at him and but if I choose to be, I think they're gonna, I don't think they're, gonna cave. I think the racial you to take this pressure. I mean Spotify that Doubts and standing up for freedom- I don't know how you can take that hit- I'm glad you are News of the day we buy back. Young girls are gone. I saw that of all things. Tell me if you saw this covers this is what I did not see. Coming would not have gases. that talker Karlsson is pulling in more young democratic viewers. Then

see and then or MSNBC individually, so here that you're, the numbers currently sweet anyway, Fox news got forty two percent of Democrats aged twenty five to fifty four, the ones you want right. This exact the age you want so in the age that mattered most advertisers, forty two percent of them Rats, CNN, Olga thirty. Three percent of Democrats now remember Fox news also has a huge numbers in general, so they have been more of every category.

I didn't think they would have more democrats. Have any of you knew that I've been specifically for talking, Karlsson, let let me be Carl and carbon while Karlsson was top among Democrats in the demo across all cable news. Tucker Karlsson is the top thing watched by Democrats. What am I really, this rock her also who is top among Democrats and the demographic across all cable news and ranked third among Democrats in total viewers ship? So I guess you throw in the old people and the other people that children, while so what Annie explain that somebody says hate And all these watching, you know what I think it is, I think it is destroyed.

The government is just popular everywhere. Do you think in that, if you had to say what is Tucker Carlson's political view, if you're on the left. You policies republican. If Europe, You might say say I mean he's, seem sometimes surprising, but more on the conservative side Fisher Libertarian. I think little closer rotarian right! But if your messages the government is screw you and you can't trust anybody Others. There is an obvious for that approach. there's a big audience for that, but you but you also have to be. I don't think you can ignore the fact. I've said this a million times Foxier says that better production values- this is the better produce show, and I would say that.

Tucker stands out among the crowd of people who do what he does at the moment. He does it better than anybody else Would you agree with that? I was a young and cable news, just just cable news low I feel like. Even if you disagree with them, they just the performance, the thinking the provocation, the I'll just tell us that goes into it. The writing. Feel it feels like almost every part of it is just a little bit above who is competing with so does surprised me, the people were drawn to not only quality of their programme, mainly technical sense, but also the message and not just in the government? That's that's my view that this might best my best hypothesis

a scholar pair all is down presently were expecting that the number of people who were on the payroll, go up, but it went down quite a bit. Why isn't? Well here's some speculation with no numbers Viana do speculation. So for this is my own speculation and Mark Schneider ETA idea here of the throne? Somebody on Twitter mentioned a vaccine mandates. Distinctive vaccine mandates would be reason apparel is there. about, as this will emerge later added about them. Turn to single family incomes. I was sort of expecting this. I feel that a number of people said you know maybe Only one of us needs to go back to work, but you twenty twenty do so, which everyone does matter so I think it'll be more so

family, less traditional does working mom arm, but probably a lot of that still majority, probably. So that's that's. That's it, but I'll bet is also hard to higher. So here is another old man yelling at the clouds thing, and you really have to fact check me on the stuff because I am somewhat hyper aware that there are some points in my future, where I can only see things through an old man lens, just gonna lose the ability to. See life in the normal way because it fills a gap. Is everybody. So why would I be the exception. Here's! What I'm thinking never seen so many people in the young working age category who are incapable of holding a job is that new.

Do you see this unjust in your personal life, the number of people who, for different reasons and anxieties, often want For whatever reason didn't, whatever their base the base capabilities, and I'm not sure that their different genetically than anybody ever I wonder if it's partly that the environment got more complicated or are people different? So here's the question: did the the environment get too complicated and there's some people who, just you know, they're not built for that level of les a stimulation and it there? over stimulated it's like paralyzing or is it something in the waters are simply on the diet, but if it's just the schools are banned,

Did you know? I was say somebody say the soil, but it's not like it's. Only boys were being affected right, no competition. Somebody says other really heavy speculate, and then I'm also not sure it's true o drugs drugs maybe Although I haven't seen drugs being directly implicated implicated, although yeah- I guess so yeah, I guess it would be the combination of the whole bunch of stuff. I hear some see then fake news. so the report the Tennessee School Board a comment about the Holocaust, dazzle rats or portrayed as people on the server holocaust. Easy and it so they ban these books in August, the libraries than Scotland School Lubbers, because in the book

quote: unnecessary use of profanity immunity and its depiction of listen suicide, and the CNN commentary here opinion is as though it would be possible to debate one of one of the most violent. last century without violence now, What is wrong with barely a book for having too much violence and the sector that if it's a school, that new light, could you put your copies of penthouse back when you're happy is a penny else? Can you just put porn In the school library, I'm pretty sure we ve always had restrictions about the levels of violence and an nudity essentials them right.

Am I wrong now, even though is a classic yeah, I know it is generous. It's it's a classic. but why is this? Evil news? Is a news serious question. Isn't this just the most ordinary thing, and I think that the political power This is because it about about the Holocaust, maybe would denying kids some history about the Holocaust. But I don't feel like that's really gonna be skipped. Are they skipping the holocaust of history? Now you data comic to do it just feels like a non story. They turn into a story. So Can you believe that the binding ministry is going to appoint a Havana syndrome? Coordinator?

of Edison round. The thing that, as far as will you tell never happened, it doesn't exist, is probably a psychological disorder, although there could be an actual physical disorders caused by something but unlikely to have been caused by a directed energy attack. But we have a sitting Senator Democrat other matters in this case 70g June Shaheen retweeted for too long Americans affected by directed energy attacks. What I guess this is a big problem in our world market affected by directed energy attacks, have struggled and fought to access the care they need and deserve to get well their expense. drove my ever to establish this coordinator and reform. Our government responds to provide equitable club so there's a senator who believes that its

proof enough that she can just weeded out, like fact that there was a directed energy attack at the at the very least now proven here. We all agree on that at the very least is now proven there wasn't you it's not in evidence There are some suspicion, another the latest, the latest eyes. I've seen as it has been developed by it out debunked, doesn't mean that didn't debunking right either. So I don't doubt that people have actual medical problems, I just don't know that this is a source, and I think it's weird that we're gonna have a chord Interflora mass hysteria as if it had been real,

and you know be hilarious hypothetically. What, if Trump guess, reelected work with me on this all what have trouble selected and then appoints a trumpet derangement syndrome coordinator to try to try to figure out how to collectively deal with the damage has been done to people first friend from trumped arrangements syndrome the source, I think the song of the transit derangement syndrome is a directed energy weapon that directed energy weapon is the press. The faint lose but you'd have to admit that the press is directing its energy. directed energy at the people's skulls work concerning the fake news that directed energy

and that is causing them in many cases, correct me if I'm wrong Gimme a fact check this. actual verifiable mental. Illness Bab right Trump could literally do this. Now we wouldn't want to see a budget for that person and what is spent money on it, but it would be hilarious. Add it would be completely defensible began. The news reported on it and they tried to say how ridiculous it was. There was still have to talk to the experts, wouldn't that well with the experts say what what the experts say where they say: there's no such thing as people have. Mental illness from the time of tromp, though they wouldn't say that I'm pretty sure the experts

confirm that something like termed arrangements syndrome, absolutely exists. Then we'd have to talk about where it came from. Wouldn't we and of course, will never agree where I came from, but wouldn't it be hilarious if Trump MID the conversation about where you got the Trump arrangements syndrome, instead of whether it exists It would just be too perfect and even better than doing it for real better. Doing it for real would be to do it on the campaign trail and say he was going to do it, but you don't know if it's he's getting or not cuz. You think I might actually do that and then the press wouldn't know. If he's getting so they report it like. He wasn't kidding

but they wouldn't be sure, and then that would be. The story is self whether he is getting or not kidding. It would be just the ultimate campaign thing to say trumped arrangements syndrome coordinator, to bring help to those who are damaged by the fake news and the back it up with examples. When somebody says that's crazy, you say well, did you or did you not report X, Y and Z, and if somebody thought those things were true shouldn't they filled trust about them. A chill distressed, if I thought those legs were true, so is a wonderful were just persuasiveness just for fun. Here's a thought. If climate change poses a whole bunch of problems that have to be re, mediated scan, it costs a lot of money right, so the other than economic.

Actions. Now, if you could release on the question of whether a climate change is real, I know you're gonna be hey. It's not real. Forget about that for a moment, because that's not important to the point. If it were true, if it were true, that's all be massive economic displacement because of climate change. How do you fix that lets say is gonna happen is too late, stop at which the experts are telling us right there already saying it's too late to stop pretty big economic problems is not too late, maybe to stop even bigger ones, but but pretty much the Consensus- and I know you don't: do you not agree but hold that thought, because that's it that's not the conversation it's not about whether you agree with that. I'm just saying hypothetically: if there were big economic displacement,

What would you have to do? This is airily to fix it. Will you spend a lot of money and my right, but more ironically, it will take a great deal of energy. literally oil and coal, green energy and nuclear and every other kind. Energy and since we don't have as much grief, energy or nuclear. As we need nuclear being green too. Where would you get? So I feel as though you ve got a question. I haven't seen addressed that if you have to fix all the economic displacement, would necessarily mean a whole bunch of energy increase which It also makes it clear that works. Well, I guess,

My question is: if you have a long range eighty, eighty year economic model, is anybody doing right or appointed even be done right? It is it just save to say this is sort of Jordan. Peterson, take as well that if you're looking at a hundred year model Doesn't matter matter how you good, you are modeling you're, not gonna, get a right just another thing, but I wonder about the feedback thing. that let me know simplify the whole point that I should start with. There are some who say that you're well being is directly related to how much energy you could use or that's available to cheaply. Maybe that's all you need to know what? If what? If the only thing we did is we just ignored the climate and everything else, I'm not saying I'm just this is just a mental exercise.

what, if you just ignored everything and focus on one rule and the one Rule was this: the more energy you can provide for everybody at the cheapest cost, the better everybody will be in the long run. I have a feeling you this that simple, though you can ignore, all the models and all the everything and just try as hard as you could drive down the cost of energy and also to produce more of it in every way the you could like you get as much oil as you can, because Cynthia, if you boost the economy of a of anyplace, it's gonna do better you against any climate change risks. So I feel as if We have all this complication because there are people whose jobs it is to do complicated stuff right.

The scientists have to do complicated stuff, or else. What's the point, a bigger scientist was that's what they do. They do the complicated So you're, probably we probably get drawn into thinking. Things are way more complicated than they should be, because there are people whose job it is to say. Hey. You better pay me, because I can do this complicated stuff. You can't, but it might be a simple economic truth that more energy equals more better the time every time, and I would love to see some economists, especially an economist who is involved in this kind of climate change,. I guess I should have asked a question. Bjorn lumber great. He would be the right kind of person, s question. Is it true, just generally speaking, the more energy more cheaply with just always is the right answer, no exception mighty.

I'm just curious if our running for president, I think I'd be saying it. I did my mask this experiment February. First here was my result in mask required: Californy I was the only mask less shopper in my supermarket and it was pretty crowded. Do a lot of people are not a single problem. I just didn't wear away. Nobody's that even now I did you use the self check out, because I was going for a soft target here. It was more important for me to get in and get out without being challenged. Then it was to make any specific things happen.

So I want to use the self Jacko but of course the self check out never works so or there's always a problem. So I end up interacting with a mast employee. If the supermarket, who stood next to me, whether mask on and said nothing about the fact I didn't have one now, do you think half the people looked at me and said: do you magnificent bastard? I wish I could do that And half of them said you were going to kill my grandmother. Maybe I don't know I couldn't tell. I was just telling you that I couldn't detect anything except walking round, and if I have to be honest, I'm not exactly the kind of person ligature challenged in my town. So is not really a. AR test if I may throw summer systemic racism at you.

It is a true thing. The people who look like me don't get challenged in the town like mine. Let me give you an example. If I saw construction site, I could walk into the middle of the construction site. And the people wouldn't stop me they would assume I was in charge, so I could talk, self pass! Every security stood, gazing dizzy I've ever been stopped by security can get through, like ultimately could get through now It is literally true that I've been that exact demographic that looks like It should be ruling the world because systemic crisis, and so people just sort of assume that I'm trouble not trouble like physically

but I just look like Michael challenge that guy's probably got he's, probably got an ace up. His sleeve So I have a feeling that when I walk through Safeway I dont get the same challenge I might be. If I were twenty years old, If I were twenty years old, do you think somebody would have told me you'd put a mask on that? They would have maybe more anyway, so I tried it a few different corporate genes and the private private companies Raul Masterless, at this point for all practical per, Nobody wears a basket their home. Nobody worse, mass to socialize nobody's telling their kids to stay home does a covert I mean basically masking over. If you wanted to be so, here's my point masking actual caliphs

It's it's over now, if you'd like to push it harder. If here to state that wants to push it, I think it is now fair to give a bad yelp review to any business that challenges you on being masterless, not a bad yelp review for requiring it possessed, usually just putting the sign up. Ok with signs. It puts up, but at this point I want to set this earlier. In fact, I didn't want to recommend this earlier. Does I think Europe is like it's a nuclear weapon? You dont want to use our yelp we'll take a business out. Its is really bad if you get it helped. This is one business I couldn't on restaurant. If somebody was mad at me for something I did in my public life, they would gonna yelp and give my restaurant that nothing to do with anything bad review,

And if you have a bad review on the help you you're dead, if your local restaurant, you just said so so people had the ability to put me on the business and that's kind of what happened. I'm either. There are other stories for why being in restaurants, about business, but you couldn't. I couldn't get past the bad Yelp reviews from the people who were mad at me. For other reasons, So Yelp is that powerful. It was powerful enough to completely changed my business life, our full was, and I have my own power own power so, like I'm, a powerless individual in society. As I just said, the elder took me out, noble so. If there is a business now, don't give them a bad review about some of their service or something just be specific, but it'll show up get their attention anyway, schools across

America are implementing some kind of Bee Elam Week of action one of the gas contract, she'll parts is that violence is calling for a quota disruption of western nuclear family Leathern, some good, let's take into this little bit and returned to the quote collective village that takes care of each other. So this is part of a starter kit for schools and want to be teaching the bill M week of actions. Now here is my persuasion, advice. I know you're gonna hate this, but I almost sword a kind of agree with be alone, but there were either saying it makes us sound like nothing. You were possibly agree with is what they should have said, and maybe I'm interpretive you're wrong, but I think this is what they would want.

If a nuclear family works well for you go and do it, but there are lots of people for whom it doesn't work, it won't work and a lot of them are called children for children. You might have one parent it was an effort so that there are probably lots of people who, just through no fault of their own, just the nuclear family isn't working, so they need some kind of extra village challenge right. So don't get mad at me for thinking that the nuclear family is the best institution. we all agree that right that the nuclear family, when it works right, I think everybody will increase the best disabling disagree with that The ideal situation- you know your parents are functional and you ve got enough money. You live in a nice place. I don't think you should be

But would you also agree that not everybody can achieve it realistically year? The number of people can hit. That would be twenty five percent, I'm taking you. I say twenty five percent Khazars another twenty five percent, the pretence or happy but they're not so if you actually could know secretly and peoples has whether things are working or not. I think that nuclear family thing I mean what are the odds of getting one good parent, while the other not that I raised fifty fifty yards, anyone where it about fifty fifty now what are the odds they get to good parents when the eyes of getting want is fifty fifty twenty five percent is a twenty five percent, just just based on the awfulness of people they you're gonna get some Elisa below average experience.

And then one of them's inadequate level, so that so I'm only may he persuasion suggestion year, so don't get mad at me for doing something sounds like I support be alone. If you haven't heard my ear, the full breadth of my opinions, I think black lives better, has been a scam organisation, even though they had the good intentions by the people, but I think the leaders at this point obviously just scammers, so don't use were disruption to say you're augmenting year, improving beginner, Here's another persuasion thing about school choice,. I guess to represent I was talking to a senator Didn't see what the setting was, it doesn't matter to the point, but it looks like some congressional kind of debate thing

and represent representative noise, and I hope on producing right, asked another. Asked another representative I'll get that says why doktor private schools have the same level of accountability. Scrutiny as our public schools, and the answer from a representative. Cantrill was quote and here's the years they kill shut. This is done so well, yes, you're right. They don't have the same level of accountability. There a higher level of accountability. Families have freedom to leave. I thought well yeah, we're done here we're done here. That's like round ground the high ground maneuver is account. Goldie is the only way you get anything done. Am I right who's. Gonna argue without statement having accountability,

is the only way everything's ever work is no exception. So There's more accountable than people can say: well screw this I'll take my money somewhere else. You couldn't get more accountable. so, if someone is arguing for a school choice, Cantrill is either a natural like ie, just might be just a great communicator, utterly legal smell, but the way he spoke so succinctly put this is. It's a sink to part. That's the impressive work having the idea is something you ve all thought of a right. Just knowing that. That's true is something you ve all follow. So it's not that but how he boiled down was its eyes. of all accountability. Families have the freedom to leave. You done. That's perfect, writing and perfect speaking,

So I just point that out as good persuasion. And I would also say that you can always tell the Republican in conversation even without them being labelled. Do you know how. The Republicans, the one who is making an appeal to how human incentives and motivation works and the debt. That is the one who was acting like they forgot that variable, if you didn't, I saw the video before I knew the political parties, but is justice, as soon as you see one talk about motivation and incentive market forces and the other one acting like they. Don't even understand that you know the parties so by those doing this cancer moon shot, he's resurrecting it? They had this during Obama, by an administration

I guess it's mostly funding to get and he's got a aggressive goal of reducing cancer deathrays by fifty percent. Pretty good, I mean I like the fact that is. Take a shot at it, but so so let me say this from me: I'm assuming that funding it is gonna help fairly cancer rates. Death rates have fallen quite a bit. Twenty five percent and last What what is it? We ve already brought cancer deathrays standpoint of it. So I'm sorry, this is probably a reasonably good thing. Is I priority right so high priority, so giving more money sounds good on paper But here is the political persuasion problem and you have to respect and for doing anyway, you dont want You sure you don't want to be associated with cancer.

I don't even like to talk about it on the livestock does. In fact, this last time will say it, so I'm not gonna use the word again and that there will be my point Our brains weaken process, something so my logically that's not how the brain is wired. The brain is wired by association, so the bridge, just associates likes, or this is like this is like that is different from us, like that, and. He forbade in having this moon shot This word, I'm not gonna, say out loud cuz. I don't want to associate with it those important, even though so top priority, even though I would compliment him for having good sense are priorities, I guess is politically really bad, politically sizzle Isn T, I dont think Trop. Whenever do this, even if you think is a good idea, I think, is political instinct

Stairway Rasmussen poll is asking is binding, best or worse, president and is one of the best or one of the worst presence and fifty four percent in the Rasmussen and Paul said the by them is one of the worst. Tromp was only forty three percent. Way. More people think that binding is the worst which museum picking up a London Democrats right. So at this point that this boys are allowed. Democrats we're not like in Japan and no bomber did better than both of the only thirty three. for some thought. He was one of the worst, so your ears are progression of of people. Without

or one of the worst thirty three percent, forty three percent. Fifty four percent do, you think, is actually the president or is there something else going on what else was happening during this period. What was the other large force? The other large force. Was the social media and and fake news as a social media and fake news got more polarizing waste, started to hate or presence more now, it could be a coincidence the last three of our presence started. Relatively awesome and just got progressively worse, it could be, and then the people notice than the answered the boy could be What whoa rule it out and it doesn't look that went but by war, ruled out, but I think.

better interpretation of this is that everything worked looks worse because of the nature of social media in the nature of the faint news business. Just everything looks so my guess would be the our next president. No matter who is war, a new record as the worst as a worse democratic republic, and it will make any difference, I think our next president is going to be. author, a racist and mentally incompetent, so the only way I can get even worse, Could you tell me, did I did I say yesterday that through is yet another big study? This as moderate drinking is not good for you did I mentioned that yesterday. I didn't mention yes well, there's another big studying this as moderate

drinking start good for you and if you ever thought it was discussed, the numbers were done wrong now, So I did a Google search of somebody says. Yes, though, our two days ago, it did two days. one of my best predictions, but one of my other best predictions- is there when the pandemic was over. That leadership wouldn't matter. In other words, we would look, we wouldn't see a difference and leadership as changing the your numbers. I'm under lay a claim down Fifty one and only place you can see a clear signal for leadership. Was a trumps warp, speed. and arguably closing, closing traffic, China, but I don't know if we can measure that exactly now, here's the thing

do. You also have the benefit of being able to measure something's better than others. Okay, so whatever you can measure is always going to seem like a more important thing picture. You have more certainty about it so because we we know, Jesus vaccinated, we know if they die, even though the data is bad. It does look according to the official data. and I know I know this is before all earlier: you're, allegedly vaccine blood clots, wipeout America, what going to happen. So we don't know the long run yet, but in the short run latest Iceland today was theirs. Stay times more vaccinated people in hospitals in America in December then vaccinated sixteen times more on vaccinated than vaccinated in the hospital in December Now, that's true or even true issue,

but was anxious aid to one right, let's say the numbers, terrible personally to one that is a big effect that can be measured. At least in this now remember. I said the leadership that would matter the most. If you think it was a huge mistake in the sky kill us all is still mattered amongst right. So my point this matter to the most argue with you about what was good or bad idea. Can we get away from it in announcing the vaccinations, are good or bad idea? Let's forget about them, just why an impact and I'm saying that nobody else really impacted anything there. the lock downs? Apparently the numbers are all over the place and that by the weather, new study your I met.

study about the lock bounds, the showed that they didn't work, but really they did work except they didn't work except was better study. Such data is bad, but it worked except in cases where it didn't work and then the bad study. That was ridiculous. So we don't know anything about lock bounds, but we do The signal was not clear right. You can still argue you. Maybe in some cases the lucky ones made some in and there are some indication that baby closing bars much difference, but the one thing we all agree on is there is no clear data right. There is no clear data. The says the lockdown work MRI go. Can we get a fact check on it, because I'm not positive all right, but I think I might

Well, if there's a small effect, the other would necessarily be worth the cost. So. All the things we can measure just fact check me on this other things we can measure the vaccinations, have the biggest impact again, I'm not saying good or bad, but the biggest thing you can measure. That was Trump now, some of you, you say away. Dissenters is a clear example of good leadership, but here's the catch. Just leadership at least terms of staying open was more about not doing something in a nutshell, is numbers orally that different from anybody else's. We do like the fact he protected the elderly we're we liked his regeneration thing well, while that was where, It was delta, so you didn't, they did a lot of stuff right, but it's not.

it also than the numbers. That's my point, even if it even if I grant you- and I think it is true that dissenters may have had every no right he may have here every note I'll say it made much difference, but the vaccinations did even if they end up, kill you. So I think that was might were two of my least likely predictions that moderate drinking. I think I may this fifty years ago, the first time I said or twenty five years ago, problem that there is no way that moderate drink he was gonna, be good for you and that leadership wouldn't matter pandemic, except the one example and others also indication that maybe even warp speed would have happened anyway, maybe, like anybody would have done it if they had been present

We don't know that be true, but we do give credit to the person who did it. This way works so that was drunk. I would like to talk about what we Goldberg, so, if you're not up to date on this, who is talking about the Holocaust and said something like it wasn't about race. Was she said, quote it's about man's inhumanity to man. That's what it's about and she argued. I think that when one in Navarro said but is about supremacists going after Jews and gypsies, then Goldberg attempted to say covers said that these are two white groups of people according to wipe it open. While she apologized for that goes. People explain to her that turn

the cost of. Certainly the Nazis believed that the Jews were different rates. So we can argue about what race means, but I don't think we can argue that that's the way the Germany was interpreted again at the time release the Nazis. and so one sir, what he was you got, this clarification. She issued an apology which does she understood the impact that had it? she explained the others had become better informed, sounds good. she apologized in the way that I took a sincere. Would you say that her apology shit the form and was timely, I have the forty eight hour rule says: if you apology,

as in forty eight hours? You should be forgiven, no exceptions. If it's just words not if you kill somebody, but if it's just words and you correct and clarify in forty eight hours Forgive him. So, according to the forty eight hour, rule Wabi is forgiven, but occur into her employer the biggest bunch of keys. Let assholes I've heard of late. She Gus suspended now. you can't be a little bit wrong in America. It can't be wrong and that corrected and apologise on a fucking opinion show. Are you kidding me. she's she's, an opinion person who gives opinion and opinions show she gives an Opinions show the disagrees with some other opinions.

Changes or opinion on the opinion, Joe clarify and apologize sincerely and correctly I mean it form nice form and she his fucking suspended You cowardly pieces of shit talk about blowing a public relations opportunity do you know how this kind of work this how this should work. We all learn something about the Holocaust. This was the opposite of a negative anything. Everything about this was positive until they suspended the person who caused the positives they to happen. Do you know why people have different opinions and then talk about it on tv is so you can get smarter, that's a whole fucking point. What happened? She had an opinion.

Other people had an opinion she revised or opinion a you got smarter. I mean. I am not sure that I never thought about that specific question I felt a little filled in little context where we, of course they would have called it raced back then, but you know maybe our definitions of race of changed or whatever This is this is most horrifying Lee incompetent response. I've ever seen from a corporation I may just who can others to Joe Romans response to his controversy. I gave you. we can enable us a little. Steve Jobs, level comparison, you don't get any better than that that the standard of how to do it. and then ABC loses PR department. We scientists horse shit about

Somebody who clearly is not a racist. Will you come on you're working Goldberg. She she's suspended for being a racist or saying something. I guess was insensitive ITALY, Then we or something ABC see news, yours so, incompetent Billy the entire. Whoever came up with this idea of how to deal with additional be fired. All I can. believes that there's a ceo will look at this. I wonder if the sea I was even involved, let me give you a hypothesis You are very weird hypothesis, I don't think you see, I was involved and I think he might reverse. It was the sea.

Who is the ceo of Daphne didn't? Dare just changed recently right, MR seal Dizzy Command, some he's gonna tell me chapping Zeit Bob is a shape. Actor chapping! Well, here's that that this. What, in my opinion, on my opinion, live stream? The ceo probably didn't see this. I think you didn't see it and here's, why? I think it you didn't see it you don't! become the sea of Disney by being a fuckin idiot, and this decision is fucking Idiot territory. This is what somebody who learned public relations does see out. This is not

c, o level thinking how many people would agree with me. this looks like this looks like human resources. Doesn't MRI. Mean maybe the ceo got pushed into it somehow, but now there is no way that this is my prediction. My new protection, the ceo, did not have a less a strong input. Some helstone spoke about the law. Who covered risk, so there In all three journal starts out by saying that asthma, unhealthy gum, bacteria, the presence of auto antibodies, mother and some other things. Can whether we will have this thing called long covered.

And then in the body of the story, there's a completely different story. So if anybody works for the Wall Street Journal, I I missed it, but the headline said the asthma was one of the four things and then the story doesn't so I think you ve got a headline story mismatch or or I'm a bad reader. I wasn't hurry. But given that I have as well, I would like to know if I have a risk of a long covered, but according to the body of it all these other things. One of them is that you might reactivate Europe Steam BAR so the year, your long covert is actually the Epstein BAR Commission interview. Maybe some people have Addison Disease, some people have some.

auto immune condition that isn't so bad normally, but Agus pushed over the edge. Somebody said yes, that, ladies and gentlemen, is all I have to say today and question is Skype that we refrain critical race theory as a religion. Never works works, people of and try to do that refrain forever. Science is just a religion. It makes a good bye we are stuff but nobody's ever been persuaded by, because I think people just no other religion is and what is not and they're not going to change their minds. and a plus people have a positive view of religion.

When I say alcohol is poison, that's a good refrain because nobody likes poison, but people do like religion, Since you say our critical re SIRI, that's like a religion. People like I didn't realize it was. I gotta get a micro lesson. I getting past security. Well, look like me, I guess. Maybe an old, bald go with glasses. Snout is a good strategy to back what the left hates the most like Trump, probably not,.

Based on our comments, oh here's, an interesting comment, so Michael says, based on our comments, I think, would be Goldberg isn't particularly fond of Jews. I feel as though that's a little mind. Redriff I mean you know if you, if you accuse public figure of not being fond of Jews, you better bring the link you better break lake. I take that. Will that personally, honestly, because lesson shit as me: just people throw out some wild accusation and then somebody season the comments and that's all they ve ever see them the topic. you better bring a leg? If you have an accusation like that, as we all live in a world where that safe to do, but you are actually very creating an unsafe environment for a public figure when you do that kind of stuff.

I know I'm going to free speech, so I say you did get banned for saying what you're saying that different countries covered, I'm saying as a as a point of personal responsibility, no shit out there unless you can back it up. If you back it up, then please do, because that would be worth it She would mushrooms help someone with addiction. I'm gonna tell you the Google that, because I don't like to delve into everything, they would look like a matter.

recommendation, so I never recommend marijuana or mushrooms. I might tell you if I've had experience with them, but I wouldn't recommend that that's a medical thing, and why would I do that? It is looking at some your comments. Now Steven Spielberg launched what peace career a wires Whoopi, clearly that a racist. Why just say that she wouldn't be under view? If she were, would you agree with me when I say is clear that would be is a racist. I mean that in the classic sense, not not in the least say

Expanded sense that you can be racist against white people. Not in that sense. I don't have an opinion on that cuz. I don't know what she said about that, but but in the sense that the mainstream would consider her classically non racist, I think she's inside category perfectly. What is it, what are the chances? Her last name would be Goldberg inside the simulations just serving up this perfectly. You know, and this is another case of people being offended on behalf of other people. So if we ve gone through this entire Whoopi Goldberg story, but what, Anybody who is actually offended- or we all worry, there's somebody else will be offended was at the worry somebody. Also be offended is usually

Offences Third party offence right, I am pretty sure somebody, I don't know who doesn't have quite a sense. If you For that, I do somebody with a thin skinned. Not like me. I've got a thick skin criticism rules off my back, but let me protect those weak people back their rabies There's nobody beyond me! Well, I'm sure there was somebody back there a moment before that person was deeply offended by the horrible thing you did now. Somebody like me was a sense of humour in a thick skin, Garcia Account,

Do that so called says. No plenty of jewish people were offended. Deborah messing was pretty express, explicit, I'll bet if you read so there is a specific counter example Deborah messing about. If I read her comment, a wooden strike me that way, but send it to me. Yeah in- and this is also a special case right because, where the Holocaust is involved, There is not only were you personally offended, but does it make you feel less a more vulnerable if the Holocaust narrative is attacked, so I feel like there's a complication there, that there would be different.

From saying somebody was actually offended. Somebody might have less either their safety offended. I guess I'll be in other ways. shit. She might feel that her sense of security as NEO jewish person in the world might be offended by any any little attack. Ben Shapiro appear pretty offended, but again, but again I will bet if you, if you asked him privately, I can't read his mind right and so let me let me have some humility about being able to read the mind of somebody was smarter than I am.

so is the worst thing, at least with bench repair alike and somewhat confidently say smarter than I am so trying to read the mind of somebody like understand like exactly what their thinking in their private thoughts. If I can think what you were thinking in my private, if I knew a bench, Pierrot was thinking, I would be a smart as bench appear contemplation of not so, but I'll bet, here's my bet that is not so much. The EU is personally offended and in some way that his his body was having some stress, I feel like it was more like the point. We are more of a philosophical point. They may be had some energy about bless, just a guess. I probably should leave,

Another issue raised that I shouldn't try to characterize anybody's probable opinion. That's that's. Some are unfair territory but at, but I guess that's what I think of Ben Shapiro is there is, he is personal ability to be offended must be pretty. I guess you keg, you can't do this kind of work if you're easily offended, so it is hard to imagine anybody doing this was really ever offended. I don't know I've ever been offended can take an example. Have I ever set I've ever been offended by that? If I may use that word in talking about myself, I may have just like and if hyperbole, but not really I'm sure I did on this podcast did I say an on the spot. Guess would be funny if I did.

That would be funny yeah. Maybe somebody is usually I probably sometimes I ever today and I'm going to talk to you tomorrow.