Good morning, everybody I welcome to the best darn thing that ever happened to you and I don't know how life together better, but it just happened. You happen to be watching coffee was got, Adams think all the poor people around the world, not necessarily monetarily, bore but spiritually and philosophically poor entertaining deprived those are the people who are not here with us today and, if I may say so, and I would like to speak ill of other people, especially when they are not in the room, but the people who are not watching this they're, not a smart and not another sexy. As you are, I'm just saying

I don't have size to back them up, but in a totally every one of you look smarter and better looking than every other person who was watching- and I don't think that's a coincidence. Well we'll talk about statistics and things that are just as exciting said, but after a thing called the simultaneous Not that was men. All you need is a cover. Mugger, Lhasa, tanker gels, ascending, the canteen juggler flask of vessel Kind, fellow you ve ever liquid, I like coffee and join me down for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the Doha summit. What we need today is the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous up, and do you know how

Our duty is to read your comments at the same time. I'm talking try is sometimes it's not easy. Go I didn't think you could get more satisfying, but then it did. It did. Alright. If anybody is new to this live stream, the connect. the dots this happening, a man is just a dermatologists thing. I did not get beaten up. I deserve it. I think we can all agree on that, if anybody ever deserve to get been up. That's probably me, according to at least a third of my thirty people, follow me on Twitter.

all right, o dammit technical difficulty of the the worst possible kind looks like my notes print out, but I, unlike other people, have a backup plan. The goes like this. Years ago, so, let's start with CNN fake NEWS. How many of you have noticed that, I can do a segment just about every day of the week that begins with. Let me tell you about the faint lose on CNN I think most of you would agree that when I explain why I say it's fake news, there really is then? What are the odds. Just do that every day. Well, As others, a new video that was released by The generous company.

and it shows a summit capital rioters as they call them and see them making what call graphic threats against former vice president, like pens and other lawmakers and then they showed the clip. Keep in mind. This is compilation, So shows Roy. Enters plural, making, graphic threats. So I'm thinking, while how many of them whether this could be pretty bad and then I did something that not everybody is going to do. I actually clicked on the video, see these people saying the terrible things there were two of em, but really wasn't really is one and the person who made a joke about it. Laughed. So it was more like. It was less like

compilation of people making graphics rather than it was about one guy taking selfie. And saying some hyperbolic things about with what they would do with the wrong side. the guy behind him laugh Since as offer their had ha ha clearly joking now these these people were together. They were. Like your coincidentally and say place, I would like there the part, the same little group. This friend literally laughed. about you, I offer the reds now. Let me ask you this: a group of people- that will say what, ever number you want to put on it. Ninety eight percent, just patriots. I'll just pick another without any backing, but guessing ninety eight percent of the people there were literally they just concerned about the quality of election were patrons we're

Ninety eight percent going to let the two percent drag my pants into the courtyard and beheld them or hanging result. Light too, to imagine that the specific crowd of people, literally the most patriotic we're gonna hate my parents, who had been like the loyal number two who each other like Technical legal, constitutional disagreement about: why has powers were that night? preserve the bankruptcy of we're. Just going. Hang him, I don't want to minimize the fact that there were probably bad characters in the crowd, but aren't answer bad characters, every crowd, the size, Can you put this many Americans in any place, an eye a murderer, pedophile some, some dirty trickster, an FBI agent

If you took a hundred Americans, randomly selected just put him anywhere to protest about anything, them would just be so disreputable. They are only there to loot or they can. Therefore, the violets it'll be ever proud of american people, whatever view. So this is This is a diversity we celebrate. which I actually do. In a weird way. I love the fact that there is every kind of person. you want a different way, because if you thought about it by your badge and everybody was sort of the same, get old fast, I mean life. It would be very uninteresting unless everybody was just all over the place, which is the way it is Unfortunately, some of them are doing illegal things, now here's the weirdest most around ironic thing Apparently there are some evidence I don't know how solid this is might be more anecdotal, that the deal

on the police movement is cause hired gun ownership because people were Eliza and also more vigilante ism by Gunnar ownership, because people realize have to arm themselves in the most dangerous places. Here is the most dangerous place, and you know that the police have bendy funded you're gonna, go get yourself a gun. now. What s interesting about this is that. You, the place, is sort of a small government move. Isn't it Jerry think about that that you know not not if they're going to use the money for some other stuff? it's the same size government. But if the only thing they're saying, because Firstly, they don't have an alternative right, even the people who say they fund I was saying I know the alternative is more like: let's experimenter, there must be one but I would say, defined the government is a small government thing.

and doing something that actively encourages great, firearm ownership of private citizens, it's kind of republican, Skynet Republican, I was thinking. What would you do if you were a republican candidate is one, an interesting, persuasive, messaging right. so forget about was logical or true. What would be just as a good, persuasive messaging thing if you're a Republican. While I tweeted an example, I think we'll see other tweets doing will later, and I saw the big difference between Democrats and Republicans is there Applicants only want you to own firearms. If you choose to do so, whereas requests or maybe get a necessity? Publicans, don't want that many governments and the heads of the public. now, I'm not lying republic. Kids actually are the ones who would want fewer.

The heads of the public in specific, kicks because is a case of basically people getting illegal firearms in many cases at least that's what we're done about you. So in the most dangerous neighborhoods, there's, probably a whole bunch of illegal firearms people or by For the wrong reasons to go be vigilantes, so I don't know, I think you could. You could have fun with this if you're a republican candidate and just act like yeah that you and the Democrats were competing, I'm guns but Republicans all we want you to have one. If, if you wanted, the Democrats are making it necessity, let's, let's just shorter to that. That's your whole message: I'm a Republican I'm running for whatever office in some high crime area, I'm a Republican. We were

people to be able to own a firearm, if they want one Democrats, are making a necessity because they want to defend the police. Don't make it a necessity making adoption we live in the land of freedom. I want you to be safe enough, that you don't have to get a gun. But if you want one, I'm gonna make sure you have that right. It would be hard to lose one would be prepared to lose it just completely guts. The other argument, but you'd after it And others somewhat anecdotal stuff about people arming themselves and becoming vigilantes because of defined the police. Here is a interesting story of which the interest, In part is not the story. So Chris Wallace famously left Fox NEWS to go to see an up, and you got

reportedly eight to ten million dollars a year compensation to do that they use for anything on the area under their report saw rumours and he's not getting out producer and they're not giving himself but at the same time you went over there because of Jeff Zocor, who now is retired wealth retiring is residing because as is relationship with an employee, that he did not disclose the least allegedly that's his wrist and. So that's the other story is more like a year schadenfreude, so the story, because people automatic Chris wallace- they want to be happy that the left fox, because they don't like home and then he went to someplace were so. We are blah blah. We're happy that Chris Wallace's is unhappy? I guess, for some people live with it. Now I never had a particular issue

one way or the other about Greece, Wallace's politics or whose performance by I really the story in the looking for the hook, you know. What's the interesting part, and then there's a throwaway line that wasn't assent. the story. The story us good context there seventy five years old. What suddenly the story. One from mildly. Interesting know. Somebody changed jobs and like it, maybe maybe not, because we are really don't he's thinking, but Like you, seventy five years old, are you kidding me, did. You have any idea who seventy five. I would guess fifty five, I would have guessed fifty five and he does not show it. I am in his father, lived forever to write so looks like he has good genes.

But the other. This was like this slightly mildly interest. story, as soon as I that, like what the hell is happening to the world and here's the thing as seventy five, he went a better job. Because the money still matter any figures are probably be around for another thirty years, maybe so. What does that say about either good lifestyle uttered off? That's just good genes, but I imagine, is good lifestyle right. Cuz you look at him in his weight. He looks like he exercises dazzling It looks like he exercises in these right. I don't know. If that's true, I mean if we find out, he said Jane Smoker and whatever I'd be surprised, but isn't it impressive. They are, I said, the same thing about Joe Biden, but

Joe Biden only a few years older than Chris Wallis, Ankara's Wallace looks like it could be Joe Biden, son. I was blown away by what people can do if there really trying health wise One of the most interesting things in the world and in the news to me anyway, is when still The sticks and common sense don't match. So the reason that people used statistics. because if you could just look at stuff and say well based on looking at this late, now all determined this but doesn't work. We know. At four million reasons so that this whole discipline called statistics, and then there are all these blind spots. The people who do not. Statistics would not, even though, is a blind spot and I argue as one of the biggest problems in the world.

because you don't have to be an expert in statistics to learn- what kinds of situations you shouldn't trust and when Tistic statistics is a good thing to use, one is not at all. I think that the best class that you could have for It a life strategies degree would, not be necessarily a class to learn how to do statistics, although that would be great for many people. But for the mass of people who don't need to be a statistician? Wouldn't you like to see lastly, it is just about the blind spots. Like if you run into this situation. I ll just give you an example. If some is doing better analysis. The teach you how to do a analysis. I just explain what it is And say this is why I can trust him. This reason because is susceptible to what you decide as in the bed analysis, and what isn't that ends up being? What determines

So how interesting would it be to be a class? There was no more to say no more complex than what I just told you that oh mother now says she can trust, because people will be selecting things. then secondarily might be study this the wrong study, but also the biggest and if it gets put in the average, is gonna make everything wrong. So if I didn't, I didn't use any complexity whatsoever, I thought you had to recognise a blind spot are some said here is this analysis and you should trust it? Does the method analysis, you should at least be able to say? Well, maybe it doesn't mean is wrong because this about analysis, but I would ask these two questions. Now beyond that? I'm wondering if there's a even deeper meaning when are common sense doesn't match statistics.

Just makes me wonder if that's another coup that were part of a simulation just put it out there, This will be one of my weaker pieces. Evidence But if you are building a world with software. I can imagine. That would be situations where you didn't want to have to explain everything and you just put it in the code all right. If this happens, then this will always happened. Why? What is the rule of physics that requires, time to write one so not coming The rule is just it just happens. So in theory, we, Imagine that a symbol, a sign of being in the assimilation, There should be some things that your common sense says that should not work statistically, but then, when you do the math it does so I mean this is my weakest evidence Simulation broth wrote it will give you some examples.

How many of you have heard of the Monti Hall problem in statistics in the comments I'm just wondering. Here's my audience is unusually well informed, so just look at the messrs yourself to see where you stand, while a it's almost all uses and how about over here? Oh, this is quite him. Now I told you you are smarter and better looking than all the people who are not on this live stream right now, and you just proved it don't know what percentage of the general public would know what the Monti whole problem is but I'm guessing twenty percent about no more than twenty percent of the jail Public has ever heard of, and for those of you haven't heard that I'll tell you what is the moment but while this is this- is a really interesting indicator of the kind of people watching this lives through

If you know what the Monti whole problem is the US You being a rational person and really having that preference to be statistically and scientifically sound. That's probably. we're gonna dig in our ears what the money I promise and I'm not going. The boring, long explanation, I'll just tell you the Google it if this This is why those cases where your common sense doesn't match what the math and statistics will tell you, And by the way, this is something of which even the highest level thinkers headlong disagreed on. because even the smartest people in math and statistics. We completely disagree with until simulations were run and dissimulation noise came out, say why so there's that This is what it is Monti problem. This is just from Wikipedia

Suppose you oughta gameshow and you, given the choice of three doors, Behind one doors, a car behind the others doats she got to goats and one car and all the doors clothes you don't know. What is what take a door say number one. And the host, who knows what's behind the doors, opens another door say your number three. Now you still live in a senior doria right. You ve picked a door but as an opened. so that another houses gonna play with your mind and says, opens up one of the doors you didn't peck, and this shows that there is a go beyond. And they then says are right now. Do you wanna pick door, number two, which is the only one. That's not picked. and not already opened. Do you switch what you do now keep in mind the the smartest people in the world on this.

The staff disagreed, a bloody will tell you what the answer is. That's what makes it fun so go, go. Look! Look it up if you want to, but here I think the bottom line. I think, to explain this is it depends what you assume and that's that's the blind spot for a lot. statistics. That has not really is the statistics that are fully you. You're making different assumptions. Baden realize it. So the different assumption would be about, for example, was the host always going to open another door. And wasn't always gonna be door. Number three So if you knew that the whole was always going to do something with your assumption be different than if he thought that,

spontaneously thought that, based on what you chose, So all of these have a different set of information. This revealed and that's what makes it interesting now. My point, it's not what's true and was not about this. My point is that. There is really a big difference between what you think looks logical and what is not, here's what I'm going to ask you, because I'm not greatest statistics, but I think this issue, Let's say if you have something: that's a one in a hundred odds. What are the odds happens? One What side the odds are two hundred two to the I was also has honoured, one right to under deducing was underlined just math. But what about this? if I told you that you had one shot to something is honoured one and you

take your one shot or tell you you can take a hundred to one shot over and over and over again. Which one has a better chance of you win. The one where you do at once on taiwan- or you can do it a number of times, but it's always a hundred one. The people who studies statistics would say it's the same right. People were the smartest about status. As we say, that's that's a pretty basic one is the same. But here is where the common sense fails. I only get one shot therein done I can do is ensure that at times there is a hunter. Percent chance. I'm gonna get that am I wrong. If I can do it infinitely, no matter I just do the ordered one forever until it hits

So how could the odds be the same?. If one of them is a hundred percent chance of winning and one of them is honoured one, but they are right now, of course depends on now. I think, it has a little bit you can do something infinite times. You gonna do something: just twice is a big difference, let's say you limited to twice once a hundred to one or you can do it twice in that case. I'm pretty sure the odds are so close to identical that their basically identical. Am I right. what is the infinity that makes it a completely opposite, so it now if there's a here who knows a lot more about statistics- and I do- and I imagine that's quite a few of you- actually

some of you are probably thinking Scott. This all wrong. You you've described it wrong. You got the Monti Haul Road thing wrong. That's my point, that's my point. My point is that You can be reasonably smart and institutes there are still server, we're blind spot and even people who understand them can disagree. So there's hundred one thing is the one: this ban puzzled me forever. And what I see something they can cannot before. do not be true. At the same time, I tell me I tell myself that can only be because of the simulation, but of course it s not true. It could be just something else. I don't know I might make that meaningful and more. So here is something you need to understand and I think we all understand this and twenty twenty two in a way we never understood it say five years ago

a lot of the news. That is true news, meaning, actually happened. Is also fake news, because so But he guessed to decide what context you see it in whether or not you see something that would change your mind if you saw something else, so with we sort of left a realm where the news is either true or false, and that's what matters because a lot of the news that I call fake news on CNN is completely true news. they are presented in a way that clearly bent to mislead, surfeits technically true, but presented in a way to mislead. Obviously, I told us Agnes as well, but here is a real question, how much of What you see, that's may be technically true and sometimes not even lots of times, not even how much That is organic, meaning

that there was just here the bill. This model of the the news you just said, oh we'll get more clicks. If we do this, so the sort of organic. And how much of it is because outside forces have caused it to happen now. if you haven't degree in economics, I would say that knowing economics gives you like another field of vision, you just see things more clearly, if you understand the world of money, the other the short version that has followed the money. But if you Economics even followed more easily and I suggests that, given, a baseline beginning of the media companies, over time. They would all be captured by people with money. Let me say that again, Any understanding of economics- and if there are people Of economics backgrounds, can you

acting on this or even tonight, so look at the comments. If you, if you're, not versed in economics economics would guarantee just guarantee That over time, all news when we owned by people with money who are not technically part of the news right, now, the only question is how long it takes and whether it happened to every new entity. I'm gonna name a name, but I'm not gonna make an accusation about them. Ok, this is just an example. So Ceos is relatively new entity. Could it be the sum newer entities? Don't have money influence when they start, but that over? economics would guarantee that they did now. It also Economics also largely guarantees that hasn't when it starts, but it doesn't totally guarantee it right.

We are not making any accusation backs Ios, never good reputation. As a matter of fact, I recommended or go further oversight. I have added actually to my eyes, were daily daily scan. It's worth doing, but I this is very relevant, as were watching the Joe Rogan situation. In case, you didn't think I was going to make this relevant. Because every noticed, as I say they continue, rogue innovation of Amerika which means that all stories must be told through the filter of what did Joe roving think about it or save act or one of his guests, and is becoming a little bit more obvious. Thanks to observers such as Glenn Gretna, Green, Walt I'm gonna tell you what he has to say about it now. Remember academic suggests All news will become fake overtime.

If only in the way the context is presented not necessarily the detail, the news so glum, While the tweets this, it was only a court time was Question of time, before the all out war on Rogan began his way big, an off key to permit, permit him to keep going concept of free speech in the: U S is a mirage you have a right up to the point where it matters or can threaten power centres. Then you don't. It was only a matter of time. in other words the economics of Joe Rogan, his success, made him big enough. then he was sucking power away from the existing power centres. So what economic such ass is a things. staying power centres would attack. Now, that's not proof that they did. We're just at the situation that says: wait a minute

Whenever you have this situation, you can reasonably product. If it has Happened yet it's going to happen, How many who whoever degree or background in economics will back beyond that, though. once he became a threat to eyeballs and and credibility, and he became big enough. They had to attack him for pure economic incentive. Could not do it really so sure enough? You see all the other big business and restore to attack him, but then the question is is actually organic because It would be organic in terms of economics is organic they just said hey here's my competition now so Jack. I see and then and Fox NEWS go after each other each night you would expect them to turn on Rogan. Likewise, you would expect Rogan to turn on at least CNN, which he did

So all in all of the part which is just media, and it is insulting each other. That's organic what is there a level beyond that? We're somebody's Polly Extra money- and you don't know about because Did you notice the interesting timing? at the very moment that Joe Rogan seem to have weather the storm about, I ever met Doktor Malone, Doktor Mcculloch At the moment it looked like he could, whether that well look suddenly the compilation of video of him suddenly and word. See only used in the context of talking about it, but that would be left out of the video this other we have to apologize, but that which is all some story, but. Here's your ipod thesis this comes from

twitter user, local distance, w o k, L distance so just search him him or her honor twitter, but read you that thread because lots of the dorsets red. So there's Our conclusion reached in this thread that I do not personally rich, but whether or not the conclusion is right. Follow the logic. because it suggests that if it hasn't happened, it well as a walk or distance as a threat and he's responding. Something goes Bob, Since you ask me, I love you work as he's talking to somebody else who says I'll. Tell you this. Professional political attack This is I bought. This is about the general good, some three waves. One right after the other is not a coincidence, spacing good timing.

Was absolutely professional. so, in other words somebody who understands this world if you see somebody murdered, and this year too in the chest, one had probably not a coincidence- looks like professional work, but who is it you ask that takes on digging, but then he doesn't digging. He goes. The video compilation of Rogan, saying the inward was dropped by at Patriot, takes an organizational yes sixty, You see, you see the video in the tweet picture once we shows a picture and patriot takes takes credit. Republican RE publishing the information they take credit is important and you see why I solution. Organization that re published it, but also takes credit for it, interesting that they re published it instead of published it. But then they took credit.

interesting and then work or distance goes on, as you can see in their bio patriotic. His partnered with at MIDAS touch another organisation. and this is where it gets interesting, who is- This dutch well professional political organization. In fact they are a democratic super back. Or that the moment run by three brothers. I gazelle local distances friend, as the three brothers Ben Breton Jordan myself. I guess All of them have worked and media and their exports is an understanding and manipulating media. The most import, thing for us is that Brett, was a social media manager for Ellen too generous and as an expert editor, which matters because Patriot takes works with

at this stage and I'd say it's safe bad. Now this is work or distance. Talking in Israel, I'd say it's the same the given their expertise and social media management. At the end word, video was created by minors touch now I'm not saying this. This is an obligation in this threat. but we are not done this touches a super back. Well, what's a super back, you ask well, a super back. Is political avars advocacy group with us actual twist super backs, may raise unlimited sums of money from corporations, unions, associations and individuals, spend unlimited, some so overtly advocate for or against political candidates. So in other words, I can gather tons of money and use it to influence. elections. This means that a super back in taken unlimited lots of money- Spending over they want politically model Such as a super back, they can take it as much gashes they want.

Point seven million for the twenty twenty cycle and one point: five million for the twenty twenty two cycle to be exact. De shows, resources to recap, MIDAS such a super back, which can collect as much cash is. It wants from pretty well anywhere and as a perfect The strategy and media firm run by people, deep ties and entertainment. we had a hand in the inward video. I wouldn't have proof and there's no allegation approve just likely associations and I bought this is and in that it had that they work together. But So the question is why, Why are they doing this and what do they have to game? I think a clue can be found in the letter that Patriot takes wrote about all of us. Look at the highlighted, now he highlights a part of their letter is an official statement in response to the goat, Rogan apology, says that this is what patriot takes up the past week, Patriot X, Ray polished and brought to the attention to the national

but like dozens of recorded instances where Joe broken use the inward bob of love. But of course the contacts was talking about the use of it use it in his native for years. talking about it and the videos have now received millions views, so local distance a patriot taxes bragging about their millions of views and how they made them, the centre of the national conversation their bread about their clout. Rogan, is one got left us can cancel. If a group could guess Rogan. It would be a massive show, a power woke people in legacy. Media groups have been trying to cancer Rogan for ages, because steals or audiences and doesn't. by the rules Rogan also, but the book. Rogan also offers enormous platform to people like Jordan Petersen, their walk, progresses and meaning circles. Really don't like

The group that takes out Rogan would gain a lot of cloud, a lot of power the group that I can say we cancel Rogan. If we can get em, we can get. You too would be. Swing, a very large stick and that's what this is only about that's a play for about four says woeful distance in this thread in short, goes on white local dozens media's media, such as our political super back, there's very likely behind the patriotic scout there are tempted vital hidden, Joe Roguishly can take him out both because they don't like him because they want. monetizing cloud for having done so blood of goes on small. Now, let me be very clear: I am not endorsing or backing the hypothesis This in this rap, but what I am endorsing is the Understanding of how things work is a very good description of how things work. Now it s more interesting.

How many other people need to get taken out either because of somebody's business model, just competition or for political class how much of the jail Rogan situation do. You think might be somebody proving they can do. It could be that. How much of it is Democrats don't want them to have a voice, could be that, especially as the next election comes up and how much of it is organic and how much it is business models, but. Whatever you see something like this do you want me to talk about the fact that your Rogan didn't their video. I guess you could call it an apology in which he described the context and he was horrified seeing the video himself. I don't have much to say about it people said it was too far. I get that point some people

never apologize, I get that point, but I'll say it again, Beaver very careful when you Second guess people who are far more successful than you are at this stuff take a little bit of humility when looking for somebody who built. a media empire with nothing but his own good judgment. Am I right. I mean talent so, if years, if you're saying I would have handled that differently, if I were in his shoes You know what else you you have handled differently, everything that that's, why he's a why you got all hundred million dollars and you didn't cause you doesn't do it the way you do it be careful What are you criticise somebody in their own domain? Remember. This is is domain is not yours

there's domain is the republic I read the room. Is literally a stand up superhero in in today's world? He stands in front of audiences. Any feels them like a real time. You just feels them this is about as connected he's about is connected to his base as anybody, but maybe tromp was I'd hate to use them in the same sentence Gus. Then it gets political, but also. Could you be anybody who have more experience and more directly connected like in a visceral way, standing in front of huge crowds, saying a lot of stuff than he probably says on the shelf And then let us show it is no lots of feedback so. I'll tell you, my own interpretation was. If, if it were me, it would have been live shorter, but I guess that advice for everybody for everything,

I think that his instinct to say something about it- felt right. The general message he set about it fell right, but a win win, win! Wait too long. He gonna hit the high points with exactly the same point and I just think it would have been on and better, but that that's just a general statement I make about everybody's communication, even my own. If I really my own tweets. I was well. I could left and were their shores Much of it I sang somebody should have done something sooner right is the most generic attack you could make, should it also. True of everything, this good eyes, that's all I've, just not too interested me. If all the report does not gonna, just starting to double. I just, get the point where I can check his work. If I can do his work

Don't check his work. If you can do is work, and I can't do it, I don't have the eleven million followers so but because everything in the world is really about me, this brings me to me. and here's some information. You might not alone my audience is down about twenty five percent, maybe thirty. I. You didn't even followed autograph just what Boop and it happened kind of quickly There are two reasons for this. I imagine. number one is talking too much about the pandemic and under the world has moved on. So I I think it is far too much weight. California perspective. Because I was, I was still in the prison camp and still am. The people were out of the prison are now

be so interested in everyday hearing prison stories. I get it, I get it, but I tried and failed, and let me say this about myself. I tried failed to make it more about how we think about things, but I guess that's just to harder. Ecad thread that needle doesn't work for everybody and work for some of you and I think, for the people How does it work better? But it's a hard general message to do so. My orders is down twenty five or thirty percent. One of the things I ask that or again If I had a bad I'd, say yes, but that would be s but in the context of seeing what's happening to Joe Robin And if you really want to take back to twenty sixteen, there

something the trump required in order for him to win their first election. The I provided- and nobody else did That, though, is a key test victory. I don't think history will ever record this, but this is easy to check and we can go back and jacket yourself. This varies The until somebody array framed him as a persuade her, he was just a liar. Am I right? Here's a liar and a comment. But until somebody could explain everything that you saw in the different frame, which was, Oh, this is three teach us. And then that phrase always forty chess, oh he's not playing twenty seventh, each US and then I started talking about was or was he not doing it intentionally? Now that started with the blog posts called clown genius redefined him from occurring.

Two, yes, is a clown, but he's a clown. Genius is doing the clowning for effect and its working, and it will work. I think that without that refrain If anybody says that didn't come for me, just google yourself, you can find out. I don't know you would one, and I think that might be half a dozen voices who can say something similar that they added something through a process that was somewhat necessary There are a lot of bank accounts. The other MIKE's ravage big account made a difference. Here you could lists a dozen other people who just had been the council made a difference, so he says, Narcissist Jessica, Jessica what the Shelly treatment do you there's somebody here wants to get, shall you you're? Probably

you either do or you're such a good troll that you did that you know what to say to try to get beta and to divert to you. so the point is, if you were trying to lay down suppressor fire to keep trump running for office unwilling would you start now to try to deal generalise empty platform, anybody whose voice would be part of that tapestry. Yes, Now, if the whole thing that I read from locals thread if that way of working is a common way that things happen, and I think that it is it rings. True to me, I've seen enough I've seen enough things, your personally and in the news, as as that's that looks like a thing Am I already being attacked and this this drop is an organic is an attack to come, because

expect that anybody in the top. Twenty or so influential voices financial would be anything from a big platform. Liquor like talk of girls and look at much talk in Helsinki, that right? How much of that is just softening up. The room for the elections, probably lot, probably locked. So I told you I was expecting that I would get one of these later. The lower class version of the jail Rogan treatment. and I'm wondering if it's already happened. Let me ask you this. most of my audience dropped off. If I, if I base it on the feedback, it was a number people just dropped off cuz. It was too much vaccine talk that was or But there are a number of people who were convinced that

was one of the primary pushers vaccinations in order that come from and it came from one tweet which was widely misinterpreted. I'm about totally my own fault give it to you graphically. Here's a mistaken. It now may give you some context, if somebody says something and ninety nine people understand that and what does not understand that It is fair to assume that the problem is whether the one person and then, if ninety nine, people understood it. Then the person who said it did a good job. But if something like eighty percent of people who see it, don't understand it or don't understand the way you meant it, they clearly by definition, that's the problem of the speaker.

So, given the number of people who misinterpreted a tweet, I did in twenty twenty one clearly my fault, but was that mistake. enough to cause the reaction that a god was a tiny mistake, but the reaction was really bad so show you the mistake in another softening clear mistake. Oh nothing I'll say next is a hedge toward the fact that this was just a mistake, but it was a small one. and I wonder if there was anything behind the fact that it turned into a bigger impact. Here was a mistake. I said that once I got vaccinated personally in twenty twenty one, that, from my personal perspective, as a person who is prove only for myself. I never told you

They also have access to. The new can fact check that never know because I'm not a doktor and you all have different rules, stuff right. So I never say anything about you. I just said that my specific case? All things included. I took a gas and there was a guess that I guess so the moment I got it. I have this weird psychological effect, which is that in here is the part that I got wrong. Here was my mistake:. I didn't say from my perspective. I imply that, but not well enough from my purse. At the moment. I got my second shot ever again thought about the risk to myself. That was just by personal perspective. From that moment on, I worried about the mandates only I worry about the mandates than the economy, and so

So from from this moment I was done, but here's the thing that people jumped up. They said what about us. What about us. For us it was always done Scott Scott. it's always been done for us. In fact, we don't even think it ever started in some cases. So I'm not. nothing I said, should discuss this point of view again. That was my mistake. Not your mistake So I should maybe you just acknowledged. There was another point of view that would have a little bit more clear that it was just perspective? So I do not say this is true. I'm saying that from a mental perspective, the moment I got the sector vaccination, again. I thought I was at a pandemic, I thought I was in the oppressive environment and then well said to me: oh you, James Mobile, so have no direct evidence that

I was the subject of any kind of organised attack. However, I do expect one If that wasn't now, I would expect Here's another weird statistical thing and I'm not sure what to think about it, but those of this other study it Worley study of the bar alone university in Israel, shows that divided do might be perfectly able to predict around comes along with age. so this article about this new studies suggest that the. Your odds of having a bad outcome or fourteen times higher. If you have low vitamin d fourteen times and then you add on age as protector and you'd have to good predicted now, Andreas back house has a poor.

Water on this and so on, take them seriously and appointed. The the fourteen times more likely actually range from four to fifty years, something so like gigantic range but in all cases it was a serious, multiple right, even at the lowest, it was four times bigger. Writs thus aims, and thus it was big enough to be meaningful right if it fifty times more. I doubt it by yeah somewhere in the middle. It doesn't matter where it is not rage. It would still be the same conclusion that would help you predict Given that they have done retrospective studies- and it did predict its probably is short of being proven and let me clarify announcing that adding that adding vitamin d would help anybody levies this clearly were only talk,

that is building to predict if you're somebody who's gonna get in trouble a separate question, which is definitely not proven. As far as I know, I don't think it's proven I don't think I've seen proof that immediately adding vitamin d once you get in the hospital is necessarily going to cure you like that, that's a different subject, but the question is: does it predict that you're, overweight does because people are aware of lower vitamin d on average, so does it that you about cancer or southern, I think it's a whole bunch of general low hell things so as proxy to determine whether you should hide until the is over or usage, live your life. It would be a pretty risk management fact. So. Andres has some questions about the

Value of it and you should take them seriously, but I think that there is no question that people with high vitamin d a better immune systems right- am I wrong about that That it, if you're abuse system, has good vitamin d or almost always can have a better outcome of against, just about everyone. So May. I dont know why this is controversial. as some of you in the nice enough to point out, I promise Was one of the earliest people to say at the very beginning of the pandemic. Hey, there seems to be some weird correlation. Dear this vitamin d related and so far looks like there might be not causation, not causation. That has not been demonstrated. I in theory- and this is

A confirmed by this year report there. before even these gonna drop corona virus restrictions on February fifties, meaning that the Temporary rules are going to time out. Can I get a confirmation? That that even in California, unless they renew it, which could happen that at times I've every fifty. I don't see any way that the governor could politically extended. I think the fact that we we call them without his mask. At least the mass are gonna have to go away and nine days, but Yes, I want to save way without my mask, I was the only person not wearing a mask Safeway big grocery store locally and. nobody asked me to put on my mask now: have things changed

Or is it something about me? And I guess I would ask this question of you- as you know, you can't really see yourself the way anybody sees you. I've been told that I look dangerous. A dangerous in the I will kill you kind of dangerous. but dangerous in the kind, in the way that I can make trouble for you like, I can make your day unpleasant. Is that true? Disabling at their vibe, for me, Savvee says: you're scared, Elam some getting mixed mixed messages, mostly some summers, I definitely ass. He looked too short to be dangerous. but remember in this context I don't mean dangerous, physically interesting. Well, because I would have said no light? My myself

images that I don't I don't seem dangerous in any sense, but other people said that, I buy yours by funding observation about Safeway in my stead in California. You seen all these videos of people shoplifting with impunity Ulysses they also be filling up a big bag and then just walking out, because there's no penalty for shoplifting So the story isn't gonna chase you, Wanna get hurt, was not their work anyway. They can't call the cops because cops, don't care so same store that you're wondering if they're going to make you wear a mask if you're an adult by the way, I think kids might get asked to put on a mask. I don't know, but.

Here's what I I was gonna say if somebody asked me to put the mask if it was a manager, not if it was a or are not opposing another But if somebody work for the store asked me to put on my mask as was say, you do understand that even shoplifting is not you don't even enforced shoplifting. the employer would have to standardize. Well, that's true. So I say: let me get this straight. I could fill a pillow case with and walk out the store- and you wouldn't say a peep at my right while less true. Are you don't need me to put a mask on nine days before that's gonna be dropped? For obvious reasons I mean Whose was sad that conversation with me who who was the waste their time? Haven't I

conversation with me when nothing could be gained by it, so I think we ve just the point where people- maybe think about asking me but they know it's not gonna go well. Don't you think so much. It are afraid of me in any real sense. I dont think by them. Just now the conversation won't go the way they hope it will go there that look at me- and they say That'S- Somebody gonna put his mask on just because I asked him to It might be that I think is Look on my face, then, To put it on just because you asked me to that might not be the only reason. On Twitter, I tweeted this add somebody chimed in the comments and said. I hear you're bluffing, you wouldn't actually shoplift right in front of the employee, just because they may do where mask thoughts by

oh. You don't know me at all. If you don't think I would literally shoplift just to make a point don't know me at all. We ve never met. I would totally shoplift just to make a point, actually, if it was on video, Could videotape me breaking the law just to make a point even better. Let us hope I go, let it go via off any. thanks. I dont like attention enough to break a ridiculous law just to make a boy. If you really don't know me in all our trolleys treatment that those funny that somebody could MRS misinterpreted my basic character that that grossly All there we have it so the question is: can we learn

To identify when professionals are taking somebody down and do we see it in the jail Rogan situation. I can only tell you that the people were good and see it think they say it which is different from meaning is true. In my case, I just use my cases. Example I would say I don't see it. Would you agree, I was in the jail Rogan situation does look like that's there's something fishy going on, but

I guess I'll say, there's no signal, for that is just something alerted to in case. Wherever assessing, would you all agree that my guess is? No, I wouldn't say that any direct evidence of them so don't take any speculation beyond speculation. There's no direct evidence. This disagree I mean I can easily be next, but that might also mean BB thinking too much myself, which is, is an oil and weak with enemies.

I need to go and I will talk to you. Oh my god, I just saw a question here. A local some question was sure Joe Rogan Interview, Trump job decides to run. Yes, yes, probably ruin ruin his business, so. Maybe it'd be a bad idea, but if he wants to make a point about free speech, Asian invite both Biden well, ok or where he's running against, Ok, that's awaited, he put out to invitations optionally, again, I'm not much less Some humility, let it let us not as I've done before. I think after correctly, on this, there is some humility about anything that I suggested Joe Robin do in his own domain, but

One way to go would be to say I'm inviting all of the candidates. So you see both sides or origin Whoever says yes or whoever says yes He does have the the cloud that he could do both you can just do back to back. That is obvious, as Rogan isn't a triumphant, perfect person. that's why you want to watch him right. The reason we watched your Rogan is a? U believe, though, what he says is true. You know, what's the interesting thing about both of Rogan Lucy apologies, if you want to call that both videos or of explaining the situation is that you believe them. think about where that is now? You might but if criticise you other form of them or the timing or whether whether people should apologise differ

questions, but was ever even one moment. in either of those videos. You thought you wasn't talking from his actual honest opinion and the US has now think Think about anybody else. Who could do that? Who else could pull that all citizens? Who else could pull off? Both of those videos and nobody even his- I don't even think his biggest critics said it was not sincere If you can't even get your critics to say your line, you're doing something right, and on that note we will talk to you tomorrow and have I mentioned how good looking you are and how bright and caring so your mom.