Good morning, everybody I welcome to the most fantastic incredible experience of your whole, damn life. It's called coffee was Scott Adams and yes, life has never been better than just this moment until tomorrow. Wait newsy whether you see how good it is tomorrow, but today pretty good. Do a million is a cover among your glasses tanker genocide, get enjoy the flask a vessel of any kind filled with favour liquid coffee and joy, The parallel pleasure, the Dobryna, lay thick skin and solve all your problems. Here's a test they cover, problem, you want solved and then repeated in your mind.

and then have the simultaneous go. Okay, I did mind now we're going to check back in a few weeks to see if any of your problems got soul, The my guess is no fewer than sixty to seventy five percent of all your problems, which, just in and Ladies and gentlemen, is science. While Especial shout out to Mark Schneider, you there is an evil out in terms of talking about. Clear energy in this country, well here is in full Porsche in four hundred and thirty days so a year plus, when, from obese to finishing a marathon- which I believe you finish yesterday when from obese to finishing a marathon, he finished a marathon? Yes

What and the euro Viruses, you sort of documented the whole journey. And who is essentially taking, I guess what you would consider the best advice on how to turn your life around. So that came from some of my works. came from other work, but essentially just took a chunk at a time started with Very small, your goal of running ethical mile a day or something and turn it into a system so that the system just Yoda But the system does something you work on every day and I would say, as reports they worry gatherings, you couldn't run any kind of distance still success, the important thing is that his system was, he would go, do simply everyday running related. and of Sundays, he wanted is body just wasn't girl cooperate.

Some still work because system, as you give due in it that's important by the IMF for it was not that any given day here and x number miles important part was you know you don't stop and by simply not stopping and by turning into a system and doing a little bit every day. Four hundred, thirty days to go from obesity running a marathon. So, if you want it was, was the edge case. Logo was What's the best you can do. A year and a half. Well there you go things you can learn a year now somebody in my circle of social circle, Who decided that you want to learn Spanish and in, I think, something like nine months or something

six months, actually a thing in something like six months. She became fluid decided to learn twenty five words a day in Spanish and then Sego people to talk with the practice in six months, she's, basically fluent in Spanish. So it will look at the things that people accomplished during the pandemic. I mean I, I basically started all business. What I'm doing right now there was a pandemic project, So what do you see? Some of the great successes of the people of that social and personal stuff. You have a lot of years in your life, you you could make such a difference in one year. If you just get serious about it whatever it is, you want. there's a news on nuclear? Maskos tweeted,

You said, hopefully it is now extremely obvious. We won't Joshua. Leszek is watching us We won't criticizes over use of descriptive terms, but hopefully is now extremely obvious that Europe should restart dormant new your power stations and increased power output of existing ones. This is critical to national and international security. Now. Who has been telling you loudly and for a long time? Then? If you look nuclear energy is just an energy source, you're missing the big picture, and that is that it's a security problem is not only security problem. Now yo YO, indeed, the top example, but is a huge security problem as we go into space.

If you don't have the best domestic Nuclear Energy programme, you're not can have good nuclear energy in space either does indeed want to support the other, and so he landmasses now saying what some of us, I've been saying now for several years, which is you need to get, the the homeland security element or actually international security element of energy and it's not until the Elon says it in a way that it becomes real right? The good thing about you learn mask. Is that his credibility at this point, Oh hi, they just tweets something Suddenly, the entire national mood will will shift to a few points, so yeah. Also now busk is a full throated in favour of carbon fuels, at least in the short run for

dirty reasons and also nuclear, also for security reasons. So that is exactly the right opinion. Now this made me wonder, I said to myself Scott suppose, hypothetically, You have been in charge of everything for the last several years. Let's say Scott, the your opinion you personally your opinion. Scott of what we should have done had been followed. Where would we be today. well, I told you to, as many of you did right. This is not my special opinion, but many of us said tromp was right about energy independence. I would have said that I've been pro nuclear for years and years and years would have been completely right about that.

Completely right about nuclear, about climate change being a potential risk, but that we can predict it because it will be new technologies that will shape, Jerry was right about that. Was I write that new technologies will make it possible to know what climate change would do in the future. Well, there's lots of new technologies coming including fusion etc, but here's another one. This chemical, these genetically modified bacterium they can take carbon. Side right on the air. Well, I guess you know They are probably differently, but once taken earlier that you put that co2 into this, modified bacteria or let loose talk and non scientific terms, you can back together the bacteria and the co2 and water,

into useful industrial chemicals like acetone, and I suppose you know what and apparently they can do it at an industrial, economically, feasible level? So that's been demonstrated now so that economics sold in the techniques. ought to suck seo two out of the air and turn it into a commercial product. You can sell you Do you want to hear my weirdest prediction that I'm positive is going to be true? My weirdest prediction is that will someday be in an industry to mine Co2 out of the air? Does anybody want to want to bet against that that is based on this stuff, because I've been reading about this for a few years. There are a number of chemical processes where you can turn seo to use all farming. Ok, co2 farming. I guess.

So I think, as soon as there is an industrial, viable industry. that the whole climate change thing is gonna turn a do we didn't more co2. Am I right is simple: it is simply became feasible to sucks two out of the air and turn it into something. You can sell a lot of you we're gonna do that right away, No barrier to entry right, you just build the device, this accident, the air, while there be very drenching is probably a big industrial complex to do an efficiently, but I don't think the technology to do. It is good that difficult. So I looked for that. Look for more

of the bacterium solution, because acetone, a nicer broken all, are not the only things you concerning co2 into their justly easy things they did. First, they could turn of all kinds is. What am I covered or says here comes Ego Scott when he paused a moment speak to you, my job, because I know you like it. When I addressed you individually,. The people who think that when I talk about something I'm good at or something I got right. When their first reaction is that his ego, those people are losers. Every If you want to know something that will guarantee you can identify some blue with a loser philosophy. Somebody who has no chance of succeeding in life is when they see other people talking about what they do well or

what they got right, an emerald, negative reaction to literally a negative reaction to success, there's nothing. There would there's nothing. There could predict you're gonna lose in life than that comment. now you don't have to like anybody's personality or the way they present themselves, I've just say that if another person's ego is what you responded to as a whole, list of the thing? There's a just look at the thing, I'm saying: is it true or not true, that I've been pro nuclear way before some of the people talking about it at? Let's just true. So if you think that the question that you should focus on and that story Scott was right about nuclear. If you think the thing you should focus on is my ego, you, my troll or a fuckin loser, You will always lose life. Is you can never see the tray for the forest.

If what you're worried about is your psychological reaction to me being right about some of the most important things in civilization, you have a mental problem. It has nothing to do with me, so don't deal with your mental problem and then, when you've dealt with that, come back here and make some comments. Okay,. Erasmus and says that in the? U S. Seventy percent of the people they pulled favouring, U S oil and gas production. I have told you, For that, if the public in Greece, something by you. I just picked out of the air. Seventy five percent is gonna happen. But I'm a little concerned that it might not this case. Is there. Is there something was different about? U S, oil and gas production,

The seventy percent of the public can get what it wants and get rid of this guy who, by jolly And I'm thinking that this, this administration really can't do that, can. This, is most care really entry, just suddenly change direction and increase production of fossil fuels, and my right carefully so you you have to get rid of the current administration. Get was seventy percent of the country wants which has increased or U S, oil and gas production. I think that binds administration, especially because the progressive way they can't possibly change direction It is bite, engaged direction on fossil fuels.

It would be such an off brand thing to do. I don't know what what would lower telegrams even do that how'd, you even process. If you're a Democrat, it couldn't be anything there's more. central to the Democrat brand, that climate change. So you have to actually elected a different person to get this result and something that seventy percent of the country wants would be an end antithetic, To their entire worldview, I rarely if ever this moment For time, I've ever that word out loud anti static, yeah. I just realized. I've never said that word out loud and the reason is I would never use that word and public picks up. I was reading the common, here's a simpler word, because it's not a word that so six greater would reckoned with I try to avoid a word that is six greater, does recognise.

well once again, Jonathan Turley, who is one of my favorite writers on all things, political, you started, Democrats, big lie. You know there, third. The Democrats, big definition of the big lie was when Trump and others said that maybe the twenty twenty election was rigged and the Democrats and the media label that the big lie, the biggest But now I was then surely points out Biden and his supporters have a new big. Either the round so There are big lie. Is that the various it's that are changing their election laws, changing them to steal the twenty twenty two and twenty twenty four elections. In other words there, their private and the public do not accept the next election base. Things. They say the rapid. Now in the legal system, I mean transparent things that ambition,

but there's over those things are going to basically rigged the election and so will be a fair election when it's done. Now what you that, because I can't for you anything more dangerous for the country. Can you were, these January six hearings under the the theory that, when politicians and Lemme administered tell you that their system that they are part of is corrupt, is really destabilizing so when Trump says an election was red, destabilizing for the country, whether is right or wrong, so very destabilizing thing to do. Here's by them doing right now the binding knows. Mission is performing the crime,

That the January six people are trying to investigate like at the same time now I mean this is not exactly an apples. Apples, comparison. but my point is if January six was allegedly so bad, because as a risk to the democratic system itself, while they were binds doing, is exactly as much risk and without the storming the capital apart. But that was not really the important part anyway. It was important in terms of the violence and crime, but it wasn't important the actual stormy, the capital. It wasn't important in terms of the direction of the country. I mean it was a small trespassing cry basically and surveillance dont want to minimize the violence. I was real, it's just a separate question. I thought so I think I is right on the right on point here that the binding administration is creating it.

every destabilizing and dangerous situation there doing it intentionally, they're doing it with great planning their do your way in advance and I can't think of anything that would be worse for the country, then telling people in advance the election will be. red and they're save the reason, an appeal The reason they are giving is completely ally. which is that these laws are making a harder to vote for Democrats. I guess and that therefore that's how the election will be Rick but the the rules that are being contemplated and passed by these various states. don't have any of that. The other claims Does it reduces the hours for voting, but you look at the lawn and increases the hours, Literally, the opposite of what, by certain illustration, is claiming.

January six, violence than involve transporter simply saying: well, I'm not gonna. I do agree with you that. All right, so the temporary great piece on how the I'd states has enabled Putin by not, and other countries have enabled him by not responding for his past is past, discussions so went onto Crimea. I think the world's at a cut that out, but we can, The sea is a special case. Others tremendous Russians, strategic impact, since a small area, relatives the rest of the world. The Russians and just so you can rationalize in a way which I think we did. And then suddenly, Putin's and Georgia

and you say: well: they are kind of russian speaking and say yes or rationalize it away and then the other I don't have the time and right but food and destroys Grozny totally the city of Grozny, to get it actions and we say what sort of a local problem- and so is the georgia- was before Crimea subleasing somebody with it. The point stands there. He did a number of things, The EU would expect somehow world reaction to. by individually the World CUP saying. I think we can work with you and those Jake. Dapper pointed out the Bulls Republic, Gibbon Democrat presents going back to Clinton were very, very willing to work with Putin and thought they could they. They thought they use a straight. Should

but now the the news which I think is fake is that Putin has always said that if you look at his writings in speeches, he's always tried to reconstitute the Soviet Union. And so you should now these definitely giving gopher more countries in the comments I want to see European given that would have now absorbed Crimea, Georgia and let listen. He succeeds in part of or all of Ukraine. Would he go for more. if he finishes with Ukraine, will go for more or Dover, maybe well. I think I thank you. Putin has shown that he will go for anything either he seeking get. What would you say I say you, I say Putin by his nature,

is it comes from a long line of leaders who have the same characteristic? If thanks it'll work, he'll, try it does the only requirement, right as it was like a work if it's gonna were yeah now the Baltic countries, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania would be sort of obvious territories just because geography their little Countries not much military and there, find that little, that the Soviet Union used to serve in the way and has little strategic value so yeah the bachelor look at those, but they are NATO. And the smart people are saying: you'd, never attack NATO country. What do you think. I think, he's weird though everybody is respected, this NATO boundary, decisive where'd. You.

Because in war every boundary gets just obliterated you you don't want to do, but it does. but why is as NATO Boundary thing but even Russia, seems to be acting like it matters for obvious reasons. Does the military alliance would be triggered. But would NATO just start knocking Russia man, I'm not so sure that Putin does care of its NATO. I think he only cares what they reaction would be India is worthless. They article five gets initiated witches. Nato's protection of if anybody's attack were all attack, but do you think I'll just pick the country: do you think you, Russia, move troops into Lithuania or Latvia?

Estonia is maybe a different question, but neither give move troops aware that NATO would start world or three over Latvia. NATO, STAR World WAR, three over Latvia. Most people say yes, but I think I think you're. Looking at the credible deterrent thing, I just. don't know that they would so the problem is if, if Putin as a differ calculations than you do then he would take those things: well, there's like Russia has responded to the credit card companies saying they won't process credit cards for Russia, And now others got their own entity. That's gonna work with the chinese entity to replace the credit cards. as others have said, will we look back on this as our biggest strategic mistake ever? because we allow that China

and Russia and their allies to create a functioning alternative currency that would replace the dollar someday. Have we made it easier for them to destroy the United States? I dont know But I have a question about. Have you see the story about the the Russian. whistle blower, who allegedly was had better enlisted the russian intelligence Agency, the ABC their story, this big threat on it. The number of employees. Now, the whistleblowers, making claims that you boons and of touch that the russian the ears of the claim. and I will tell you in a moment that I think this is fake news, so my opinion

Is that all of this is very good news, but I'll tell you what it has been reported as reasons, but I dont think the top. I don't think the top media entities by size have treated. This is real. somebody, something in me a fact, Jack of us, but this story seems to be in. I say that the second tier publications or third dear and on social media, but is not on. I don't think by the New York Times Wall Street Journal. And the claims are that this russian Intel guy allegedly says that the russian dead could be as much as ten thousand, but nobody knows and that Russia has no way out there trapped and basically. all big big, a bigger problem. Now, here's my dick the The credibility is that,

People who were in the russian intelligence agencies have been asked. This looks like a real person whose only intelligence agencies the tubing or the Russians intelligence agencies whose names we don't know. Yes, oh that's. Definitely a real person there, just by looking at the writing, so would, you believe story that is coming deadly. Exactly what you crave would want to hear when you is creating one fake story after another in the news that port we now rice? That's not me speculated. We know for sure you, creators creating one false anecdote after another and the reason that we could trust the story Is that somebody claims that comes from an anonymous source? Do you trust that If our all you knew it came from an anonymous source. Now you would just that sea you have to launder the you, not a man of a source.

so the way they laundered. It was this. They talked to other unanimous sources who say the first unanimous looks good to that seriously. that's how they laundered. Thus, they said Oh, you can trust. It goes the one another the source validated by two other anonymous sources and we're not going tell you any their names, the most obvious, vague news of all fake news, and is I retweeted it. remember if I said it with fake, but I retweeted it. We're in at a serious fog, more problem does the morning Think about it Honestly, when I read it, I read the english translation, so there might be some When I read it, I said I thought it read as obviously false, like obviously made up like really obviously like super, obviously fake, and yet they sold,

many of you by saying that they talked to anonymous peoples. I was real. Now is that works let me tell you there's a report that I can fly by flapping, my arbs course. You don't believe me Why would you believe me if I say I can I threw the air by flattery, my arms, the don't believe me, but let me tell you: there are two people who are absolute experts arm flapping flight. I can't their names are, but those two people or experts at flabby. Your arms, like they bore, said that I can do it so now. You shall. Open sure, when I said I can fly by arms and fly well. Ok, kept us, as might have been appropriate. I can see that, but now the Now that there are two people whose names I have given you who say, I can totally fly by flapping my arms. I guess you convince Thou art, you aren't you now.

with that, but the person in the media who I told anonymously, then I can fly by flatly Mark and then he wrote a story about it will now there two sources. There's me tell you, I can fly by flapping minds, but don't believe me look at the news. The news as I can fly by flapping marked yes, That's true, I did give the news that story vessel publishing but is still too sources to sources, is good Well, the really one source coming out to places, but still get. Apparently, there's a history of russian mothers, mothers of soldiers influential, at least in Afghanistan. Allegedly they made a difference. And now the russian soldier mothers are getting involved and there the report's again, would you bill these reports are true. The sounds like ukrainian disinformation.

But the story is that the russian conscripts thought they were going on a training exercise and did not know they were going to an actual war. Do you believe that. You believe that the russian conscripts did not know them. Going to a real or I'm gonna put that and they list Things which I say is very unlikely, but it's been reported as true now I do leave that russian soldiers are not allowed to have phones, but don't you think that their leaders would now, if they're going to war, I think the soldiers had some inkling that when then lay landed in Belarus that that was close to Ukraine, and maybe something was happening there that they heard about. Somebody says they think it's true. I will say it is not impossible

but I say the odds are being true or pre low. But none the less. I would say that the russian mothers do not know what harm their children, and I would say that we should make sure that they know that. so I'd love to know what we're doing CIA wise to inform the russian public of what their government is doing, because, maybe that's all key if you fight in some way to inform the russian public of what? Actually, Maybe it makes a difference. Lucas Tomlinson, who reports were Fox news This provocative tweedy says but three days since Pentagon, first called the long russian military convoy outside UK capital as stalled. they now wondering where the russian soldiers are you, officials? A thick quote. Something must be wrong. Something must be wrong. Well, yes,

A forty miles convoy that doesn't seem to be moving anywhere during the middle of or let me tell you something, looks like. Drawn though some have suggested that they're just waiting until their moment to come in and occupiers Some have said that the distance at their artillery work, so why would they getting closer? While does it make sense to me, but. And we know that the Ukraine special Forces, here the supply lines. I think the quietly, if I read between the lines, isn't Luke. Tomlinson asking Why there was so much equipment, but not that many soldiers This is a story that doesn't seem to be anybody in the talks that they don't appear. Man. Because we haven't seen people walk around now why

when the people just try to keep warm moist incited idling vehicle we rather gas. So the soldiers care really stay in the vehicles idling, because I'd rather gas, and they can stay outside cuz, it's probably too cold. So where are the soldiers. Of the soldiers laughed Asperger that pretty good question. I, as the second question, is it possible that Putin brought in a whole bunch of old equipment as decoys and built a mild decoy army that has almost no fighting soldiers, but a lot of old shocks and show you did leave anyway that possible that here getting the defences to focus on a bunch of old trucks and equipment, and they were never meant to actually attack. Does anybody do anything that clever.

In my mind, that's too clever, because I think we would have noticed if they were if it were not not breaking a convoy. I think we would have noticed what we are being attacked by creating here. Yeah code, we use their multiple stories about convoys having to a capital. This would be the third, story about a convoy having to a capital. Can. the? U S, tracking convoy right now and now these drugs going to the Kapital Apparently, the airspace is not being controlled, now This is all NATO line in the sand that seems to be holding is is weird me because NATO can provide weapons and logistic support.

Why do we think that providing lethal weapons is not the same as being in the war? Is it because Russia is arms, producing. If Russia were not an arms producing country whose entire business model ass to be we're not in this war, would you sell your weapons? Oh now, we're not part of the war that you give attack. recently weapons were we're just we're just commerce, we just sell weapons. So I think because Russia does that and they get away with that ridiculous claim that are not in the war there just providing lethal weapons to the war that we get to. the same thing if Russia if Russia were not a big arms producing and selling country things like the second biggest industry, or something They too will be able to get away with the same bullshit theory. Were not involved in the war were

giving them all the weapons and training and logistics. That's all. It does feel like violating the framework directives that is gripped the sentinels the same thing where China is not making you take friends at all, no there's providing precursors to the cartels. That's ok, Even the kills fifty two hundred thousand Americans a year intentionally, thus thou war, we're just sell stuff people, the people buying. It were making the war o. Doesn't people salad,. it's a ridiculous standard. Haven't we drifted to such a ridiculous standard? The standard always should have been. If you give weapons to my enemy, I get to kill you always then the standard, but somehow the world is accepted. The standard am I wrong.

A ridiculous stammered if, if play hands my enemy, who says, he's going to kill me hands that person a gun they start shooting at me. I would kill both of them. Without I mean, if I can do it legal in and I could get away with it, I would kill the person who had it in the gun when you, if, if that person knew what the gun was going to be used for equally equally marked for death and located. In fact, if I got that one over on the person who had the gun, like let's say I somehow prevailed I would just shoot the guy that handed it to him, even if he wasn't coming at me. I was just saying you just gave this guy this fucking gun, I'm glad I won the fight

And kill them and now you're dead. I would just kill em worsted if he had if he handed the gun to the guy who shot at me when you who, wouldn't I mean you ve, got the legal problem that it wouldn't be technically self defence. Are you going to jail forever up still do it. I still do it the programme. five, the knife, to put it this way under something, but I'm still, though it there's. No doubt I tell him I'm pretty sure about that. Now. That would be a good movie. Somebody says be the first Well, I guess the? U S and the? U S is actually talking about banning russian oil purchases being the most obvious thing that we should do, but I wonder I've got some questions about the economics of oil. Why is it that the

prices going up as opposed to us talking about not having well, I feel like. Shouldn't we be saying it's not about the prices about, somebody will have any so, let's say in California, we pay a dollars a gallon someday doesn't. Mean that Lithuania doesn't have any gas or whoever it is the person who didn't get it because we bought the limited supply. Does that mean that there will be some poor countries that just won't have gas? Isn't that the big problem, we're talking about us. You are inflation over here. All my my gas prices will be higher, which is a big deal. I mean it's a big hardship, but isn't the bigger problems that they're going to be poor countries with no energy like not because they won't be able to play anything like eight dollars, a gallon. So I think we'll talk about wrong stuff.

Because when we're talking about the Ukraine WAR, the media, of course focus is another. The sexy stuff, like them, the military in the death, but the Ukraine. The Ukraine problem is a humanitarian crisis, not just Immigrants or the people migrating out, but also how you see the people or their weapons when the bread basket of Europe gets destroyed. So maybe we should be talking a lot more about our due to feed people and get some attention to them. Do you think that the Eu S will ban russian oil purchases because I guess Europe is talking about you, and I know I don't see how Europe can do it. I could imagine the United States banning because, as twenty five percent I feel like we can manage twenty five percent. What do you think I feel like the United States? Could. handle a russian bear, twenty five percent,

I'll say this base the. Totality of life experience, plus some economic, treating you make people handled twenty five percent of anything. Just in general, you, change anything by twenty five percent about Eighty percent of the time people just adjust is bigger than that. Then you have a guess, harder and harder, but a twenty five percent of judgment Do something with a fungible asset it with lots of moving parts where they can produce more kindly quickly and they could do things because as bigger profit temporarily, oh you talk about the Bio lab conspiracy. Now, I'm not goin to the idea that there Bio, Labs, Ukraine, and that was part of the story not leave any then if I saw you think credible doc about, but there's nothing credible. Yet that story.

So I think if I had to predict predictive our political reasons will at least announce we're going to stop buying russian oil, but about I have to phase it out. We're like an essay turned off today. I think, will phase it out, which means it'll take so long to do that. It will really be anything except that announcement I think we're going to say we're doing it, but do it in such a small way. It would be almost like we didn't do it. That would be my guess, because it's more of a political problem than a practical problem,

What do you say about today's news, who needs a double buffer zone or the Arandia yeah? So since everything is connected, there's some thinking that weaken, weaken, get right. To be flexible about an ran deal in a way that they never ban if we packaging with something they want to regarding Ukraine, what do you think about that Mida Koshy, dating technique is that when you get to the point where you can't negotiate a settlement as of Ukraine or having truth, they don't really have a deal that they could.

Agree to that? The way you get to the deal you can agree to is you have to start throwing more things into the deal, so you started throwing a ran into the deal. You start showing energy into the deal. You start yeah, you just throw everything into and then see. If that changes the balance and if you make a deal so What I know about the arab deal sounds like. feels like any deal with we make with IRAN's to lessen build a nuclear weapon. Am I wrong anything that they would agree to what gives of at least a secret way to do it. Sorry, Ukraine will decide the deal Scott, not the? U S, I don't think so. Do you think Ukraine will decide on the deal and not the? U S.

zaleski- is a U S pocket. So, in my opinion, as the lens he would agree with whatever the. U S told me had to agree to because it will be a exist at all. Problem existential, meaning die if he does wrong thing. near times, Friedman is China, whose side are you on less obvious. Zalewski was elected. He ass, he was. He stole a puppet. those claims vouches under federal witness protection? Now, just I probably Siberia lot of exploitation have probably minerals, yeah blackened over masks

how many people think that there is a global recession coming. Here's what I would add to your economic concerns, the you can't look at his to figure out, what's gonna happen next, because you can't look at anything pre internet and predict. Post in red. Actually let me make that as a Scots rule of predicting the atoms rule are predicting that everything you could predict before the internet has to be rethought. Doesn't mean is different, but he'd have to rethink every prediction that would have made complete sense before the internet. You have to evaluate it in after internet world and hears

In the wasn't wonder was the great depression. Thirty, nine! Some historian! Can you what was a date to twenty nine? Yes, twenty! I'm sorry I can use it with the world or to so twenty nine was the great depression in twenty nine those pre internet. Now What's different when you have the internet and you have global everything and everything's fungible meeting you can you can move goods around where he ever Unita I think in this world we adjust, we adjust to inefficiencies so fast. That makes the odds of e complete economic meltdown almost zero, so in other words, even right now, because gas,

Ass prices are high. You should assume that the the he the people in the near the Hunt- Oil Company in Texas just made a huge amount of energy. You mean investment in drilling. Oil. So probably the entire oil industry just went to DEFCON Ten and is just. doing everything it can to figure out how to produce more energy. Likewise, you go see more stuff, a nuclear. You see more self everywhere. So I think that the existence of the internet allow us to do something that would be greatly destabilizing in a pre internet world, but will not be as destabilizing post internet because, the internet tells you where the problems are and then

extra resources towards that never existed before. Pre internet. If somebody want to hire somebody and somebody wanted a job, it was hard to match him up. Unless you lived in the same town But after the internet, every opportunity can be matched with the solution, no matter where the solution is no matter where the opportunities so in In my view of the world, the risk of aid depression, post internet is very small unless something Knox our communication. so communication alone and the fact that we can ship anything from anywhere. It anywhere should keep us from the worst case scenario. The western fight,

system may be going downhill. The finance system, too, has the same self healing element to anything. there's always a massive communications. Everything the brakes guess healed fairly quickly. I often. Right about this, that the civilization seems like a foetus, this being developed, Seems like the internet is sort of the central nervous system or the communication path for the the entity, which is all humans. So once I communication about is in place, humans create an almost godlike power because all of our strengths are combined and we can control coordinated. Oliver's thanks, it's almost godlike, but the internet allows them Consider the negative wealth effects, though.

Ok. Let's keep you! U S puppet and master persuaded easily. Those are not even in conflict is A coincidence does less. He has entertainment skills, proven entertainment skills and his is the personally, I see now he literally as an actor so what what did you say, the scene where he was talking to the journalists, steadily behind the podium he grabbed a chair early, sat on the edges stage and show Saint shook hands with them? Now that's what an actor would know how to do. If you do, Movie and you ought to show a seed where the lead there was a person of the people. What would you do? The person of the people in the movie would walk past the podium and grab a chair and sit on the edge of the stage and redundancies are shaking hands with the audience in this

The journalists, it looks exactly like a movie, in fact Ukraine like it in its third act right now, The fact that this has such a movie structure to it is really should open your eyes a little bit about the nature of Rio. because a number of times a reality follows this reactor movies structure. I don't think it's a coincidence could be selective by us on. My part could be, but it sure looks consistent. As a wise man once said, politics is Hollywood for ugly people he's a good actor. He is.

I now do you believe, the the theory that the reason that Putin has miscalculated- he is people won't tell him the truth. In other words, people who work for them are afraid to tell him is ideas or bad? How many of you think that that's a thing. I don't, I don't think it's a thing either. So the media, the media, is reporting the poorly so isolated, he doesn't know that even his own people's think something's a bad idea, I'll think so I think police completely plugins and I don't think that he is in the real world the person whose the best advisor to the leader is the one who does tell him he's wrong. Let me let me

justice against your understanding of things leaders do have sycophants, and yes, man right then, and there are people with a scream. That's certainly the case But isn't it your experience that leaders almost always off always have some trusted advisers who do disagree with them and they require them now, of course, of your dictators, You say nobody disagree with me I'll, execute you, but it wouldn't be good for the directive, everybody was smartness, Putin. No matter what you say about him he's not dumb. Anybody was as smart as Putin. need somebody on his team who can tell him what is wrong and he would want that. So I dont believe he's getting bad information.

Are you heard the same thing about Trump from Democrats right and didn't you hear the same thing about Trump that the Trump was? I would only be sold things he wanted to hear. Elsie get real mad total bullshit, total bullshit trump, probably similar to most people, would love to hear a better opinion. The disagreed with everybody likes a better than people, don't like like equal or bad opinions, the disapproval, but everybody likes a better opinion. Disagrees disagreeable, they hated and love and at the same time, because everybody, So better opinion. So they might hate the fact that they have to move from their old opinion to the new one. Please don't want the good opinion. lesser literally crazy. Fourth, political theory is the bad advice. I don't know what that means.

And I would say my own experience with trump when I got to meet him and chat with them in the oval office. Twenty eighty My own experience was that he was absent listening carefully to what I said, and he wasn't telling me what to think he was Look, you literally asked my opinion, actually use a good example. when I met with Trump. He asked my opinion on a specific thing and I disagreed with him. I disagreed with. Did I have any problem? no, no. It was actually just an interesting conversation because my disagreement came with reasons. I gave my reasons. He gave his reasons and by the way, when we disagreed- and we did to you on the topic-

Tromp was right. So the thing we disagreed on, he was right because he predicted in twenty eight in the binding was gonna. Be is a big problem, competition and I thought it was Campbell errors, so he was totally right, but I You gave me full attention and respect and listen carefully when I made case and then told me his open. So Get anything like a sense that disagree with him would be any kind of a problem. You just got to be able to support it. If you can support your opinion, you always think the boss has an idiot right. I mean I made a whole cartoon based on that kind of dynamic. If you believe that you're smarter than your boss and your boss doesn't take your advice, you think the boss is an idiot.

But that doesn't mean you advice was good. Heavier advice was bad. Maybe here the kettle. What companies and countries use the same template against Trump that they used to get his food, and you mean the the boycotts and stuff. Eddie any leader who does something bad off as get boy cottager. I've told you. I told you that One piece of content about the meeting, before the reason that I had told you that piece of content is Trump Tromp was right, normally normally wouldn't want to talk about an conversation you had with President Bush is sort of standard standard assumption. You know

Talk about what you talked about with the president, but I made an exception because he was right. I mean you wouldn't mind right if somebody said you know that cartoon has guy. He told us what you said: But he was right years years before it happened and unambiguously right, so rise on. Think thinking complain. I think that's all we have to safer today. He added did If you saw that John Daily thing, where he have a phone call with tromp just recently, and he put the phone call on on the speaker and then somebody recorded it and then they played it.

If, if you are trump, and you would call John Daily- and he did that to you, would you ever talk to John Daily seriously? Would you ever talk to John Daily again about everything. I wouldn't erase him from my life that day I would never have another contact with John Daily and by the way. If anybody takes anything leaves of them privately and shares at anything, never talk to them again. That's my role right. I follow that rule. If somebody shares a private thing from you, never ever talk to them again about anything period. they're dead to you for ever act. Nobody should ever talk to John Daily about anything. I won't let alone we go no stronger on John Daily. What he did to job

isn't just a bad thing? He did to trump You were friends with John Daily, and you saw him do that the Trump presumably was a friend. Would you be that assholes read that is ass old move up you'll ever see. I read that that's asshole squared, where there s a security risk to add yes, John Daily, the golfer so Trump, your nose famous golfers, of course, but man. that to me I've been, I would never even shake hand what hand what what John Daily did to tromp is so disreputable like if introduced to introduced in public. I could even shake his hand like. I would be disgusted. That guy I'm that's that's as low as you can go. Your friend college

You're selling out your friend as you're talking to him, you don't go lower than that as low as you can go. Any chance, he dares trumps permission. No there's no chance led. Maybe you told him, that's what he's going to do it and look like it? What I shake hands with the Obama you sold out our country, I would always shake hands with a president because even present because you're in that case, you really are talking about the office, even if this an ex president. So, yes, I would add polite. Let the collar know, if he's on the speaker phony, our is not just polite, is

way past polite. so we say those polite to tell somebody if they're on the speaker phone is way. Ass, polite, like vat, should be a requirement of social existence if somebody impolite to my still talk to them later, but somebody put you on the speaker phone and doesn't tell you. I should happen to me recently that the actual thing happened to me recently, as other speaker, founded, did know and I'll never talk that personally and I will literally never talk to let brazilian about anything for any reason, and they know it and by the way, their own that persons or of it will never end and before that,

Substantial your connection, but you do that once and that's it there's no second chance for our flagship am right. Who would give somebody a second chance after labour, then let me ask them. You'll give everybody a second chance. Nowhere. Even if you didn't say anything terribly damning and I didn't Even if it is a thing terribly damning, you'd never talk, let brazilian you shouldn't. So I said I would if they were family nope. Not me not me, so they said that they would speak to them again if they were family, to which I say no, Now that's a forever problem. If somebody by family did that out, never speak to them again, but nobody, my family, would do that.

As of now, I think a babbling I'll talk to you on Youtube tomorrow. I think you ll agree. This is the greatest live stream. You ve ever seen speak among yourselves.