On the phone, but oh well, ladies and gentlemen, if I were prepared and my printer were working, I would be looking at my notes right now, but despite my best efforts to make their printer produce something, it does not. As I say, the sound is bad joke that printer, yes, I might go, The

Sometimes you scare them is my imagination to their work. I think you're starting to print. I'm watching this with a great excitement. Cause, there's a really good chance if this doesn't print I'm going to smash it on the tile floor, so this is kind of exciting if this doesn't print. How much would you like to see me raise it above my head and smash it on my floor on camera? I did it with my last sprinter I'll. Do it with as many printers as it takes.

Uh, oh, let's see what message as this will determine if it lives or dies. You know about that. Odin Centre. So it told me when I was in the paper just before I smashed it on the ground.

oh it like we'll have a show today could happen, although my God could I be, less organized could I be. Let's pretend none of this has ever happened. Rewind uber will blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah lap up up up up up up up up up up rewind the good morning, everybody and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you now.

It was close. We almost have a situation here, but apparently my printer doesn't tell me when it's out of paper the first time you got to beat it up a little bit and then it reveals his secrets. I just shook that printer and made it work you saw that with your own eyes right? Did you all see that I just picked it up and shook it and scared it started? It started giving me information. anyway, if you'd like your day to be great, all you need is a cup of uncooked, also tinkered Chelsea can teach yoga flagship vessel of any kind. Philly is very limited. I like coffee enjoy me now for the parallel pleasure, as the dopamine is the thing that makes everything better. It's called the subtlety of that now go now everything, Better apparently I was a little under caffeinated problem solved

let's talk about all of the things mostly fake news today dead. Seven, who, as you know, is dating now Kim Kardashian. Pleasure of Kanye. and Kanye has now marked be Davidson point where PETE Davidson. got a tattoo. I guess he got some tattoos with Kim Kardashian's name on them but also he branded her name on his skin. You branded actually branded himself with her name. Now I'm not sure that this was communists plan can he's pretty smart. I feel like cardio pushed him until he branded himself and my wrong, because if you try to get back a colony, here's away,

not to do it, but Kanye wife's name on your body with a brand. Then changed. Girlfriends, probably any day now the fun part will be Davidson explaining the brand on his body to his next girlfriend Collyer. If you watching this, I dont know if you can stop now, because I'm just going to go out on a limb and say that Kim Kim Kardashian is not going to marry. Pete Davidson. anybody want take the other side of that, but I think you're not getting married, and so there is a good chance that Peat Davison, there's gonna, be making love to his future love and she's. Gonna say in our bothers me: you didn't get my

my name branded on you and PETE Davidson will not have to brand every woman. He wants to have a relationship with he's going to have to get a brand on him. He's going to look like a a cow that used to practice branding. Now I wonder what kind of a sex qualities m, because if there is one thing that the news has taught us, if somebody inherently gets a brand. They are the sex cult. Am I right so I think that Kim Kardashian should probably go to jail for many years. Just like the the founder of an axiom who who had his little sub group there who who branded each other same thing, must be a sex cult. I think Kim Kardashian probably needs to go to jail for many.

as for running a sex cult and convincing b Davidson to put her Brandon. Oh wait, wait, p P, Davison is male, am I right is male, so if a man decides to voluntarily brand himself, that's not coercion. Do you know why. Is this: a man isn't bad, but if a woman gets a brand voluntarily she's a member of a cult, she couldn't possibly have had the free will and she has been forced to do this against her. Will why? Because she's, a woman.

The logic is inescapable, men have free will and women don't. According to everything that I've been told the last few years am I right. Woman gets a brand, she must be recalled. Man gets a brand. Oh, he just wanted to get Brant, it's pretty sexist for any sexist. Alright, here's more fake news, there is a woman who is going to be opening with. steely, Dan or opening for Steely Dan the summer Aimee Mann and she believe she was dropped from the the show, because she is a woman. And she believes without evidence that Steely Dan thought their audience wouldn't like it. female singer, songwriter. To which I say what what

Now, be one thing if somebody actually said that, but nobody actually said that. Do you think that in the year twenty twenty two, the steely Dan or anybody would say you know, I don't think an audience is going to watch a woman saying that crazy. No, the simulation has given us another another. Entertainment here and there her name is Amy man she's actually aiming to be a man according to her name, but she was dropped because she thinks it's because she was a female singer. Songwriter know that looks like

fake news and just to stir things up, did you see the Dave Rubin and his partner, Slash husband, I'm not sure what the proper terms are are having two babies, two babies, both with surrogates different surrogates, and I think I think, different, sperm and egg. I think they I'm just guessing if you could have two babies at about the same time. You'd probably have one baby from one father and the other from I just assume I dunno, if that's the case, but this is really pushing the science each their own sperm and all the same. The same egg donor really same egg donor. Somebody said. Interesting, okay. Well, I saw some conservatives vomiting in their mouth when they saw this news and saying

Dave Rubin. How can you call yourself a conservative? Do you know how Dave Rubin could call himself a conservative He says, he's a liberal every time, anybody ass every time, every time, a hundred percent of the time. He says the liberal, and then they like a liberal and people say. How can you call yourself a conservative now that didn't happen, but apparently people believe that David Rubin and his husband are violating some kind of Christianity biblical rule, to which I say. Let me check my Bible. For the part, surrogacy, science and test, God said about that or doesn't seem to be here.

It seems that the Bible was silent on surrogacy. So how do we know what the Bible wanted or what God wanted? Isn't that a human interpretation mean I realize the Bible has to be interpreted but if God didn't say anything about it whatsoever? How do you know what he's thinking? Ms bad enough, when we're who is giving me the snore over here, you actually pay for a subscription and then the else nor at me about we get rid of you Jesus. So we will get ready. You gotta buy interfaces, and let me do that. Alright, I guess you'll just have to say the same word over and over again

Okay, so they rubens making things interesting again. How about that Florida law that I've been refusing to talk about for really good reasons. So here's. if Florida law about teaching gender orientation stuff in school, At this says, this is the actual, the actual language in the law that before grades- three, no sexual orientation, lessons that are not age, appropriate or developmentally appropriate can be taught to which I say this is the most bullshit live ever seen in my life. What a bullshit law forget about conservative liberal forget about gender. Forget about everything

who the fuck was the law that says that the lesson has to be appropriate, who gets to decide? What's appropriate, don't make laws about something, be age, appropriate, that's, not a standard! You can't make a standard. You can't make a standard, that's subjective! Really we just lost the sound. I did we lose the sound. I think we're ok. Oh he's playing a prank, it's pretty good! Alright, that's pretty good prank, alright! So here's what I say

forget about what you think about teaching children? You can't make a law like this. You can't make a law like this. Right. You can't make a law that says something has to be age appropriate or developmentally appropriate without any standard for who decides what? And I would imagine largely be different for different people right. Imagine if you were a kid- and you grew up in a household where you know something non traditional was going on. Maybe you should see it sooner because it would be relevant to your actual life So I just have a real problem with the law. This is this vague. You just can't have vague laws, I mean. Maybe you do need some kind of law, but this one, as I would vote against this basin vagueness in an avid nothin to do with the issue itself.

China says it's covert. Cases are reducing, I'm going to call that fake news. What do you think? Do you think China is experiencing a reduction in cases of of underground? How do you think their lockdowns are that good? What's this does not look like a troll Well, trolling makes you a troll, so I guess the mainstream media has decided that

calling our inflation, a Putin, price hike is good branding and even Chuck Todd said that and Andrea Andrea. Mr Mitchell agreed that Putin spray sake was a great way to message the issue. And what do you think about that? Do you think it's a prudent price hike? It's actually pretty good persuasion. I mean it's only persuading one side, but that's, usually all anybody does anymore. So if, if best believe it and it looks like they do cause. The Democrats are not terribly good at economics and that it works. So as a as persuasion probably works, probably pretty good. I gotta say if I'm just being objective about his technique. It's probably pretty good now is not true. Of course. That's a separate question.

So there was an energy independence bill that was blocked in a related story, so the House Democrats blocked. Bill that was aimed at say we wouldn't buy any russian oil and we would become energy independent and the House Democrats blocked. So they're calling the price hike appeared and price hike at while their blocking independent drilling and energy in this country, or at least these experts, So now the Democrat messaging, if I pulling these two together, this is what the Democrats are telling the country collectively right there. The poodle is the main cause of higher energy prices. Would you agree? That's what Biden saying the mainstream media are repeating it, so their buying into Putin is the main cause of higher energy prices,

the same time, the Democrats the same that we shouldn't and we should not increase our domestic energy production. Do you know why? Apparently it's because russian fossil fuels do not contribute to climate change, but american ones do now. I'm reading that into it. It's the only in that you could conclude because you're going to use the same amount of energy, no matter where you buy it from right. So if you buy it from Russia, we have problems. If you buy off of the United States, we have fewer problems, but in both cases the climate change is exactly the same. So the Democrats don't even have a message that makes sense on paper. You couldn't even write down their message. If you wrote it out, he said well, did you leave out a word or something like it wouldn't even make sense? If you looked at it that the problem is prudence, energy hike,

but we don't want to develop more energy ourselves because of climate change lol. We know it doesn't have any effect on climate change, cause we'll just buy the other energy. Am I wrong? I need a fact checker because to me it looks obvious that they're saying two opposite things or two things are incompatible anyway right. That's what I'm saying I mean it seems so obvious that I wondered if I was senior on like my head was just shaking I was like. Am I looking at this right? And I wonder, how did the Democrats ever win another election and, of course I asked them on twitter and everybody said they'll rig that election? Maybe they

oh well: Josie Smollett was ordered released from jail after serving less than a week of a five month sentence. Why? Because he's pending appeal- and I guess it's not- that uncommon to let people out when your pending appeal- is that true. Is he being treated special? The way the news on the right is treating it as it is being treated especial, but I'm not sure that this special More because these days, everybody's getting out on bail, right and. we are awaiting a p o. You can be out on bail if it's a man, violent crime.

Now, as many of you are correctly noted, the January six people did not seem to get that consideration, but I'm no lawyer, but I'll bet. There is something different about the January six situation. Isn't there, because if there's, if there's not anything different well, then I do have a problem with it. Now it could be different jurisdictions. It can be just that. Do you think it's just race I dunno it looks more like connections, but I guess there's here's the general question: if we didn't look at the January six people and that does look like a political hit, if you didn't count the January sex, It is a special case, is an unusual that somebody with small it's your price I'm, which stands alone? I don't think he has a criminal record. It wasn't violent. Why not

I'm not sure I have a problem with every him having Bellevue easily exactly the guy. You guess Well, because I'm not saying that he's out of jail, they're, just saying it's pending the appeal: if the appeal doesn't work, he goes back to jail. I would think that that would be a standard for everybody. Isn't it. Does anybody know or their lawyers here I feel like the standard- would be the first first ever crime nonviolent unlikely, it'd be repeated as it's not exactly the kinds of crime you do twice and it's not like. If you or a burglary might do it again or you you're violent, you might do it again. Who who is going to run another

or you know, mega hoax right. It's not really a crime you're going to do again, so I would think in that case you would get bail, I'm completely in favor of him getting bail, I'm not in favor of the January six people being held, but I don't have a problem with it and getting bailed that that to me that seems like exactly the case. You should get bail, you know I'm not minimizing the crime. He still goes back to jail if his appeal fails alright to the Chris Cuomo thing. We see if that is really interesting. When you watched back when Chris Cuomo was still in play this season. And you would watch the handle off some the chatter between Don Lemon and Chris Cuomo. If you can stand it did that ever look real to you to me that looked so amazingly fake the whole time it was happening. I never bought that they were really friends

Like it was for the gamma, that's what it looked like now. I think they did hang out. They probably did hanging out personally, but just never really. I didn't feel the chemistry to do, and it's not, you know, has nothing to do with black or white. I just didn't feel any chemistry between those two people. I dunno, Chris Christmas was asking for one hundred and twenty five million dollars in his argument is that you can't have play the standard that doesn't exist, meaning CNN didn't have a standard or if they did, everybody was violating. It routinely include the boss, because apparently the air, the allegation is a secular himself and go last. I guess that would be others girlfriend decide. If I got there, I was at the one he admitted having we get that wrong had also advised of lukewarm. They had also

Zucker had also encouraged him to interview his brother. Here's here's my thing. If, if you're, if you're a conflict of interest is over and everybody can see it, I don't have a problem with it. Do what I've always been offended by the notion that somebody would not let a brother give advice, brother, because one of the brothers had a news job, I'm not buying that at all your job, doesn't override your family connection ever and so there's really other there. There's no reason that I should have been a problem now, given the fact that Cuomo overtly joked with his brother on TV is there anybody who would watch that and not know that

the biased brother own brother interview, I mean I feel like we're sophisticated enough to know people don't throw their brother under the bus on live tv. That doesn't happen so twenty five percent- So I'm actually weirdly on Chris almost side on this because I think he makes the case that the standard was not recognized, that whatever whatever his alleged indiscretions, were about advising his brother. It definitely was not outside the norm for the business. Does anybody disagree with that? given what you saw given that it was all over it. I mean you knew what Priscus was job was you know it is brothers job was you knew that they talk to each other in public? Of course they talked in private, of course, to me this is a non story and I think Chris Cuomo has a pretty good argument here. He gives

Example of Don Lemon being friends with the Jussie Smollett. Of course I mean that had to be a source of I'm there are some other examples, etc. Yeah, I'm going to go with Chris Cuomo. did you hear about the Mary APOLLO theater that was bombed in Ukraine and. There were allegedly many civilians hiding inside from the bombs. I'm going to call that fake news? How many of you believe that the Mary APOLLO theater in Ukraine was bombed, causing hundreds of deaths

Some believe it I believe it was bombed. I believe there were deaths. I don't believe there was that many people there that many tests, because we're not saved pictures right when we see pictures of just piles of bodies now I know it's in trouble, but still use the allow more pictures and nobody said hundreds there were hundreds of people inside and they were talking about There are some survivor, so I'm guessing that there, the hundreds hundreds of alleged debts well, I'm just going to say that there may have been a horrible thing that happened. I'm not going to doubt that

my guess, though, is that this has been propagandized beyond whatever the original bad behavior was. So I don't believe anything about the North Pole Theatre, except that maybe somebody died, and I think Ukraine is winning the war as I've been saying, and I think they actually will win. I think that when it s right just go when the war and we're seeing small signs that now here's the setup. If I told in advance. This is the competition you've got on one side. You've got ukrainian patriots, apparently well trained. You've got they're using american slash NATO weaponry race of the best weapons they ve got the field advantage. And their enemy is being put on crippling economic sanctions, so that's what they got going form, but the Russians of course have tons of bombs and that they can deliver from a distance, but they also have russian conscripts russian equipment there,

And in an away game on somebody else's territory, and they have now a totally dysfunctional economy or they will soon who wins? Who wins? Who wins? With that setup. Now smart people say Russia wins because they could just keep bombing until they win. They just have to want to write. Basically, they just have to want to win, but do you think the opponents of Putin could survive if he just levels? Ukraine? I don't think so. So if you think he can do it physically you're right, I agree with you from a physical logistics perspective. He could level Ukraine, but thinking and can do it and win and that's the point right where there is the point. So I don't think that path is available. While yes is technically true, he could do

It's not really an available path because it goes directly to failure and the whole point is to win your facts and basic premise are wrong. Perhaps gentlemen yelling at me in all capital letters who quickly mentioned some of the assumptions that I have everyone use. Your words use your words. The Gilman amnesia use your words all capital, letters and vague statements, don't mean anything, but I am listening, I'm watching. So, if you give me give me an assumption that I got wrong, I will take that. Listen, okay, just it's just the troll, listen to other sources and I'll caps will put user in time out time out. russian sources, all right. So here are some of the things which we're hearing of which. I of them, are necessarily true.

allegedly. There was a two day battle in the Ukraine in city called a vast missing in which. The Ukrainians actually just defeated the russian invaders outright. They just killed tons of them and repelled them and the other one hundred bodies and stuff. So do you believe that do you believe that the Russian, but well Terry and the Ukraine military had to add, and the ukrainian military just spanked them hard. I believe it could be true, meaning that any given any given group of russian military might be stronger or weaker, and any given group of ukrainian defenders might be stronger or weaker, so it could be a case of the strongest ukrainian fighters with a week. You know bad strategy, russian advance, I guess,

Nature, it could be true, but I wouldn't automatically think it's true there's another story again from three independent sources what is the credibility of three independent sources that are not named. None. So going to give you a story that has no credibility whatsoever, just something I saw from that. unless a source on Twitter at one of the generals has been detained for reasons unknown by the security service. So this will be yet another example of somebody detained by the intelligence services terms. I'm not sure if I believe this story, because you can't really verify it to and isn't it is this

Is this one of those stories that is exactly what the Ukrainians would want, you to believe, I'm being accused of making vague statements so that I can't be wrong. I do. I think I make pretty pretty specific statements. Ukraine will win. The vague and they will win because they have better weapons, so I gave you a reason and a specific outcome. Yeah. I think I do both but the ones you should pay attention to the specific ones. I would agree with well over in great Britain, there's a club to clip kleptocracy unit there that they think Putin has millions of pounds of personal wealth stashed in London and they're going.

I to figure out where it is and and captured. I guess so now. Putin is wealth that he has presumably stashed and places around the world. I assume he's diversified where he put it, but other countries may start looking for it. Maybe they will find it. I dunno, I I would guess he's pretty good at hiding. It's probably in Bitcoin Alright, so I don't believe any of that stuff. So United States agreed to give a bunch of drones to Ukraine, but the number is unspecified giving them an unspecified number of u dot. S made drones now we're giving them both the big drones that can carry munitions and then come back, is but apparently were also looking at giving them these little switchblade drones, which are smaller, drones

and hover over an area for thirty minutes and then when you find something that wants to kill it, it just as a suicide dive and he kills it yet switchblade is the name of the drones and I don't know how many of those we can make, but could when the whole war with those I think, sensation falling for the faintness now wants to say there is cause. I don't know the numbers and I

and I'm guessing that or if you say, you're falling for the fake news, because I think that when that's not that's not what I'm based in them. So I'm not basing my opinion that a win on the fake news. I read it to you because it's what's happening, but my opinion is based on logic, not the news, and the logic is that our weapons are going to be really good. We haven't seen them used by trained people in a situation like this, and I thought, if you give them enough enough anti tank anti aircraft enough drones, the Ukraine wins. So it's really just the one with the better hardware wins in the home court advantage. Basically, how much training do you need for drones and what is the range? Well, even the small switchblades have a a several mile range, so you can be pretty far away from your target and I don't think it takes a ton of training

because all they have to do is fly it and then aim it can't it can't be that much at least with the little ones the big ones would be more. Of course, I assume all right, I'm not so sure that we need to give airplanes to Ukraine. I mean I'm not against that, but I think that if we could give them beaucoup drones they'd be better off, or at least as well off. So if we can give them unlimited drones without trigger it's world war three? I dunno, I'm not sure, there's a reason to give them planes all right Here's a here's: how to make a hoax

if you're going to play a hoax on somebody, you want to start with something they already think is true, and then you add some details to it and they're going to believe the details, because you're you're grafting it on top of something that you're primed to believe. So this is what Putin is doing is using. That technique is something we're primed to believe, but probably isn't true, so you saying that put has claimed that. Let as a network of secret bio warfare, labs in Ukraine, dedicated to weaponizing pathogens and coronavirus, viruses now

To me, it seems unlikely. That's true, but it's a really good persuasion play, because he knows that american public is primed to believe that we have weapon. Ized virus labs, all overrun bad places, so is really the technique it if he had just come up with something that wasn't already connected to a believe. You just say ass natural, but when you're connected to something you already thought was true. Then it just brings. It brings all wait to its less really good Technical Biden has called put in a war criminal, also good technique. because if you call somebody a war criminal, what does that say about the future? Cuz! That's what it's about! It's not really about the past, even though that's the the war crimes were the past and probably some more in the future. But it's about making sure that he's dead as a leader when

In the present nine states says that the President, Russia is a war criminal. He says it clearly and wants to make sure you ve heard it clearly, which is what by then He's saying will never work with them again. That's what I hear do you hear that I think you say will never work with you again. Never invite you to a g, anyting and the rest of the world, probably won't either I feel as though I feel as though that's part of the decapitation strike that is being planned. It is part of the move to get his own people to take him out. Basically, if you just say you know we're not gonna deal with a war. Criminal now could Putin just as easily call any United States President a war criminal. Probably so all the matters is whether binding can make

stick and worry you already predisposed to thinking that Putin was a worker who, yes, you are so again Biden's persuasion that uses the same technique. Tell you something that you are already ready to believe you just filled in the blank for he said: yes chew, so put it. So I watched prudence speech again this time, with translation- and I gotta say he looks mentally unstable to me. Now I've told you that I'm going to be you can't trust me to be unbiased about Ukraine. I might be, might be trying to persuade too much, but I always promise you that if I say this, it's always true. If I tell you I'm telling you the truth, like an indirect sentence, the following thing, I say is my real opinion. I'm never going to lie to you about that. If I just say it directly like look at your digital

I didn't say of not lying about this. You can trust it. I don't think I've ever told that kind of alive my whole life right, I mean everybody's, told a lie of omission, but if I tell you direct, It's true. I don't like that, but. I opinion he looks mentally unstable. Now it could be just the pressure of the situation, doesn't mean he's organically or has a sickness of any kind. He looked like someone, knew it lost and when I say lost, I mean lost Russia lost his job lost his standing lost everything. He just looks. Somebody like somebody, who's completely destroyed mentally now,. he dropped his babyface. That's right. He used to have this weirdly incongruous, face that made you like him like he always had this

likeable smile about him, even though presumably has always been a monster, but he dropped. The likeable smile now could be. He just says war face on maybe, but he looks puffy and maybe drugged. Maybe drug, there's something going on. That's not just that he's sixty nine, I'm positive! If I had to bet on it at that, whatever I'm positive, I don't know what it is. drugs could be. Illness could be just the stress of the situation, but he's not all there now. I don't think that means he is going to launch a nuke. You know I'm not on that. Worry worry bandwagon, but I don't think he's

Is functioning at its best? It wouldn't surprise me, especially since what he talked about, whereas the I think he was talking about the oligarchs and some who don't even live in Russia who may be moving against them a little bit. The things that were brutally is afraid of his own oligarchy, he's afraid of covered He thinks he lost the war, he might be afraid of his own generals at this point, if he's detaining them he's in a world of trouble, so that's my. My prediction is that Ukraine will win outright and that going on offensive and with these new weapons

I think they're going to get it done. Daniel Dale, who does the fact checking for CNN, did a fact checked fact checked. It is a friendly to a conservative. I don't know how many times he's done that, but I'll give him credit for doing with this time. So there was a viral tweet saying that Marjorie Taylor Green refused to applaud Zelensky and that's false, because if you looked at the entire tape, you would see that she she applauded him four times, but one of those times she was reaching for a phone or something and that's the part that If that was the viral tweet and Daniel Dale Dale says she was a pretty tepid clapper, but fulfill footage shows she clap four times blah blah. So I found this interesting,

Daniel Dale gave a full throated fact check to this and fact check their Marjorie Taylor. Green did not make a mistake interesting. So you know it's also nada she's not running for office or anything. So it's not the biggest thing in the world. Let's see, I believe I have touched all of my points after I'm done with life soon today. You do a little micro lesson for the people on locals how to improve their life. I don't know what to do next to improve it, and I should be able to post that before noon. I think today, russian sub commanders get their lunch orders directly from Putin.

Interesting, do you think that a sub commander would launch a nuke if that sub commander had any information about the outside world? Do they are here's a question? Would a sub commander who's? Actually, you know in the sub. Do they have access to the outside world like the internet? Would they have any idea what's going on in the real world in the movies they don't they do when they surface somebody

it's is yeah, so I just wonder if a sub commander would obey that order, so somebody says yes and they were a submariner, so the submarine does know what's happening in the outside world. All the time right, yeah, I can see them launching a nuke, even if ordered they did, that they do drills to make sure new controllers don't worry about the outside world. They are trained and checked interesting, so you're saying that they're trained not to use their own judgement about the outside world. That doesn't surprise me. They get the news from russian sources, but you know before you launch a nuke, I feel like you would probably

What major psychological testing yeah but they're, still human? I dunno, I don't think it's zero risk, but I think it's really low. I must read the sub story in the Cuba crisis. Well, I don't think the cuban crisis has any relevance to today because of technology. The US does the same training. To see if they will launch when ordered. If not they're removed, Eddie says you don't have time to check you get the order and proceeded to correct depth. I dunno, I I

I guess I'm skeptical! I hear what you're saying I hear that they would design the system to get rid of that risk, but I don't know that they would. I don't know that they would do TIM pool getting swatted again. Why does he keep getting swatted? They haven't found anything yet. Why would they swat them like five times or something Russia subs used to do three officers, an agreement to fire? Somebody says. Where is the nuclear football? Did the crew of the Enola Gay question orders? No, but they also

It was world war, two so I think in world war, two nobody questioned in order to drop a bomb of any kind. There was a bomb threat, not as what as a compound alright and that's how to use your telling sector demonstrations. What major career changes I now and I'll talk to you on Youtube tomorrow