Good morning. Everybody congratulations on making it to the finest moment of all civilization, yes, it's cold coffee with Scott Adams and there's no better place in the world to be. In fact, This is a show that's been enjoyed by well. Let's see humans raise your hand if you're human good good. a lot of humans. How many of you are birds? Are there birds out there?

I understand that there's a cockatoo named Kelly or Casey Casey Casey right, yes, Casey, so I'd like to speak directly to Casey the Cockatoo for a moment cause. I know Casey is watching. So if you could bear with me Casey Casey, good bird good bird good BAR Kc want to trade Kc want to trade good bird, or that was just for the cockatoo. Now I there may be other, it is watch it. If I did mention your name, I am talking to you to all of the constitution and some of you. I know I've had a good morning already and maybe you've had a cockatoo to but Let's do something that we call the simultaneous sip. It goes well with terrible upon

and all you need is a cupboard mugger glass, a tanker jealous oars, dynamic, anti drug, our last a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid? I like coffee enjoy an hour for them. The parallel pleasure of the dopamine is: do you think, makes everything better the thing that will make your beard talk? It's called the simultaneous sip put your big in it and enjoy now. you time, I'm surprised at how good that is. Well, the airlines the sea owes bunch of them, have asked the government to drop the mask mandate, and that the only Reason they're giving is that there's no reason not to

since people are huddling in bars and restaurants every day? And you know it's a difference? We did an airplane and the bar and restaurant, an airplane actually as good ventilation. Unlike your restaurant bar. So these sea owes have just said. Why are we waiting another one month through so to drop these mask requirements? And I have a hypothesis? which baby somebody has some data to to validate. Why would anybody book a trip between now and the time that the Mass sir Non mandated, if you're planning a trip, Why in the world, would you book a flight in the month before the mask mandate drops? If you have a choice, you're going to wait until the mask mandates drop. Are you not business? They have less choice, but even they have love lot of I mean people most

who can move their vacation a week or so a few weeks. So my guess is that the airlines are getting crushed in the current period, because everybody's saying you know, if I just wait three weeks, I don't need a Basque or whatever it is yeah. So I'm seeing in the comments people say they're intentionally waiting for the mess merely so. I think finance follow the money guarantees where things are going. The airlines, get their mask. Thing dropped If now, all fifty states have dropped mask mandates, I saw that, but I don't believe that's true. Is it true that all state mandates are dropped and all this left is federal, because I cause I thought that mass transportation was always masked? No matter who owns, The right Hawaii hasn't hawaiian island,

if has Y announced when they will? well I didn't believe it. I don't believe that all fifty states have dropped all mask mandates. I don't think that's true, but they will alright. Let me check in with you, I think you know Since the beginning, I've been saying that you don't have to worry about the mandates being permanent. Now some of you said Scott, you don't know when government get some power, they never release it. Well, that's true But this wasn't like any other situation right and The United States is not like other countries. we are a little bit more rebellious, often in a productive way, and it didn't seem to me that the United States could keep mandates. I dunno I dunno. If anybody can- but I don't think it's going to happen here so if you didn't take them too long yeah, you could argue that for sure, but you know

it takes too long for everything so check your thinking, if you believe that this was going to be masks forever, it was part of a larger global conspiracy? Maybe that won't happen. We hope dental office tools create particles that easily penetrate and ninety five, that's weird specific comment, but I'll bet you're right. Alright, I have a proposal, and I was reading about the congress- has a plan. Thinking about milieu stimulus checks to people to help them pay for gasoline link, gas prices prices so high, and I thought you know. That's not going to work, because if you sent no stimulus checks in the short term that might help them- I guess but

long term is going to increase inflation right because the the the stimulus checks will not be paid for so as to be borrowing, and so therefore, I don't think, a good plan, but sometimes a bad plan will suggest a good plan. You'll hear somebody's bad plan, you go that will work, but you know it just made. One tweak- So the problem with their plan is that it's not funded. So I propose a new federal tax on gasoline. will put a new federal tax on top of whatever taxes are. And the new federal tax will fund he's stimulus payments that will go the public to help them by the gas. There was funded by the tax on the gas. Now that you have a closed system now, I know please, please, on local people are calling me brilliant and I don't think I deserve,

don't I guess the objectively. This does seem kind of genius. I can see how you think them, but please you're, embarrassing me you're, embarrassing me anybody could it from come up with this idea. I think I've been sure it was me this time owes me, but I like to think is not about me is as we know there is no. I M too Scooby, as Kobe Bryant once said to me, O'Neill, yeah, there's! No! No, I in team, but there's a me in that motherfucker alright, so my idea, I did a tweet yesterday to cause some trouble little provocation. I did a little bit too well. Sometimes when I try to, Overshoot, the mark a little bit that I did it again creating

yet again another Rumor about my opinions that will haunt me to the end of days. Here's my mistake, slash funny we are you all aware that the word decimated is almost always misused in popular use, I know that most people use the word estimated to be an almost completely destroyed something OU, decimated that city its ninety percent destroyed the actual definition historically of decimated, and that's why the desk part of the DC it comes from, which means ten decimated means you you defeated, or you destroyed ten percent of something ten percent, though I did look up the definition before I talked about this because I wanted to see if popular use had shifted. Definition has actually so now. It's so

substantial or significant destruction of an army or something else, so it's not limited to and but as any substantial, so I would say, fifteen percent- would be substantial if that would be decimated according to the modern So there was a report from US officials, I don't know if it was Pentagon or somebody and nothing you could trust. so. When I say this information came from the government and I don't specify which part of the government it doesn't matter. What part of the government said it, because it's not something you should believe anyway, it wouldn't matter who said it is not believable in a time of war, which is how many how many people have died on the other side, we don't know how many right,

His have died. We don't really know that, so you don't, but you shouldn't believe it. But the report was that as much as ten percent of the Military- let's say full capacity, not just people, but the capacity of the russian military has been degraded by ten percent. So I tweeted, oh they've, literally been decimated, which caused many people to say Scott. How could you fall for that ukrainian propaganda, to which I said? Oh I've done now there's a permanent record on the internet. Since I keep the tweet up, there seems to indicate to some people. that I believe the ukrainian propaganda now Or anything I believe less than ukrainian propaganda. I don't know if you were to make a list of all the things I believe. pretty sure that near the bottom of it would be

ukrainian war propaganda. That might be just about the least likely thing I'm going to believe, but I did make a tweet that led people to believe. so forever. I will be hounded by the belief that I believe the opposite of what I believed. And now you, though decimated, is about ten percent now I think I saw a tweet by Jeff. Pilkington suggesting that the matchup for president that would make the most sense for both parties would be He gave a Newsome against IRAN, dissenters the theory in that their two people who will say proved themselves during the pandemic. Now Democrats would say that Newsome did a good job,

wait, maybe you wouldn't maybe you won, but that's not the point right. They only have to get enough votes to be elected. They don't need your vote per se and Democrats, of course, would say that RON Desantis did everything wrong Republicans would say you did everything right so forget about whether you like it or not, do you buy? Do you buy the concept that and let's just talk about the Democrat side, do you buy the concepts the Newsome has their best shot? Let me see now forget about whether you think you'd win and forget about whether you think he is good in an absolute sense in a competitive sense, since they have pretty weak bench thank you to have the best chance of winning, even if he couldn't win the, I see a lot of people saying ass, it may the split like everything,

but there are more people say yes or no, and a lot of has to do with the fact he's got the act. He's got the look he's got the the mannerisms and now he's got some serious credentials. For you know his his background the hair is got. The look is gas of the the surface package beer, something that I read about him today. And this will pass the fact jack, the l, a robberies. Are that involve firearms, So, in LOS Angeles, robberies of all firearms have increased forty four percent this year, according to the city's top cop. How do you get elected president when the crime in one of your biggest areas? increase forty four percent. Do you know how easy it would be to beat him

Every time somebody asked you a question, let's say let's say it's: either Trump or dissenters running for president. On the republican side, under ask a question about the other side. Just say I want you to fact Jack. This did, did armed robbery. You really go up. Forty four percent under Newsom. and then they say but Mister John, were were asking you about Ukraine and then, if I were Trump but say I understand what you're asking me. but do you understand the recipe? The comment on somebody? Who's leadership rose armed robbery by forty four percent in the year, Why would I even talked about any of his other opinions? How could it possibly matter what he thinks about world events? Did it because if you elect them, you're going to get exactly what you want, the package told you you were getting. If you get

read the ingredients. Part of the ingredients are increased, Robbery, forty four percents in one year: that's what you buy, and so you know no no politician would ever do what I recommended, which is only talk about one thing about the better to the whole time, but it'd probably work would probably work in nobody's ever going to do that because it would be boring, but it work. all here's, your daily propaganda warning this comes from Glenn Greenwald. Now I feel like is actually useful to repeat this every day or two. Which is to remind you. that your side is lying to you too, that's really hard to kind of really incorporate into thinking because we're just sort of biased, Dorothy, We are scientists, you are right all the time,

more right than the other side. Isn't it? How do we know we have no way to know that and LEN reminds us we, if you're in the, U S or NATO country you're in a rabbit we closed propaganda system. Much dissent has been banned or demonized as a point of invisibility, it may you're still one hundred percent right, but recognize that everyone in war is propagandized warranting skepticism. In other words, don't trust your own side, good advice, don't trust your own side and site fact. cost abundance in time of war. I don't think you can just anybody, because everybody's got an agenda, and that includes but at least I told you what my biases as you can do, I think is tell people what your biases, like. You know, you can't, and you can't do much better than that.

So here's a story. And this is a narrative diversion story, so why is it that you created doing such a good job of defending we several reasons, have we not, here are some of the reasons we ve heard. We ve heard that the Russians have low morale and the Ukraine I have high morale. did. I just tell you that everything from your own side is propaganda. as well as the other side so when your site, your own side, tells you here is one of the reasons is because the UK Is have high morale and the Russians have low morale now it could be true because it is certainly feels like it might be. True, doesn't it kind of feels like it might be, but I don't know

That's true, I don't know, and I dont other makes a difference. It might not make a difference, but it could also be true. here's another thing that were hearing is that the Russians using bad tactics and that equipment bad name sped tactics now is that you set you. Is it a coincidence that the enemy- let's say Russia's? the other day for propaganda purposes. Is it true that the enemy is always incompetent and yeah? They can't maintain their equipment? It might be, I mean, might be a little bit true, but how would you know you wouldn't know you wouldn't know that at all you have no way of knowing that somebody told you that now here's my question is sort of it's not quite the dog not barking, but maybe you can figure out how to label this.

What's left out, is there not something that's a little left out? Well, This narrative was boosted again by story the The green beret, the American Green Beret forces. Have been training the Ukrainians quite seriously, since Russia took Crimea. Now, if you're Green Bray, our train, you too, to create an armed resistance, which is what they do, apparently the really good at it. According to our own government, who you can't really believe Kathy, but I feel as if people have been involved in the Greenbrae could could approve this, and maybe some of you

Is right here has been involved in the green break because I do think, even though you can't believe you can't believe your government it is that is likely that the green Brave New, a solid job can they confirm that is re buddy been in the Green Bray, whose watching this would say, yeah yeah. This is real. We we yet their primary mission is training. Other forces right. The green gray mostly goes in and trains the locals to be. force multiplier. I'm seeing some people confirm this real, but let's say Israel. So now we have these three reasons so far. Why you created, doing better than most expected high morale, bad russian tactics and equipment. I guess and then the green beret trained the Ukrainians to be effective fighters, especially in their local terrain. There's still something missing.

Now, of course, have been lots of stories about the high tech equipment that we've given them. But here is what I think I think the high tech, the hi tech weapons are the actual means story. This other suffers important there. The Green Bray probably made a big difference, but I think that the narrative is trying to shift us away from the equipment aspect I tried to shift us onto the human aspect, so the human aspect is or do you have high morale? Are you well trained, and do you know how to maintain things? Do you have a good tactics, Isn't it interesting that all of the again that we are being subjected to telling us that it has really don't don't look at the drones, don't know yeah they're, worried. We are sending drones, we are definitely selling them. Shoulder mounted rock is about year, thus

It's not the reason. That's not the reason. The Ukrainians are winning. No, it's not that they have thousands and thousands of easy to operate deadly weapons that are designed exactly to destroy the things that are just destroying know. It's not the weaponry. It's all about the human part correct me if I've gone too far, but here's my hypothesis. If, if Russia said who trained these guys and they found out. It was a green beret. Let's say the Americans had trained the Ukrainians. Would you say that America is in the war Maybe you something that happened but may not be happening at the moment, so we're not in the war we simply did some things that Ukraine found useful to be in the war. So, if you're talking about the human part-

it's really easy to make the argument that the United States is not in the war, we're not in the war not non that war. but suppose I said to you this, the isn't that Ukraine is winning is that they have american weapons. That we didn't even sell them to them, we gave them to them. We gave them the weapons, I think right. Don't we give them the weapons, That sounds like you're in the war. because when the Russian gets shot, when the Russian gets killed, it's been killed by a weapon. That's right there right now, that's current You used to train us and our good on our own. That was the past, but the weapon that killed you that sorted today. And I have a feeling that, because

giving any country high tech weaponry can change the course of the war. more so than almost anything right, Erica you're too nice. Thank you So I have a feeling that the propaganda we're seeing is diverting us from the hardware part of the story and I'm going to rear my prediction. Their when this is all over we're going to learn that the EU could the ukrainian fighters had more than just the weapons we know about that that they had. They had one well

only the good stuff there might be some new weapons you have not heard of that might be getting a little test. Thus I think now I dunno. If those weapons will be, you know the majority of the reason, but certainly the high tech weapons as the story. In my opinion, I think the high tech weapons are the story. Alright see. You then. have assassinated the russian general. Now We always tac and then about being deep state owned and Cia control and stuff like that, and we don't know hard to validate any of that stuff- But CNN's running story that goes roughly like this. If there was a rare face to face meeting between Russian and US military now, we that hasn't happened in awhile and it's sort of rare and doing

during the Ukraine. War was doubly rare. and the way CNN reports us is that the rush general, doesn't matter who he you as remember his name anyway. who is normally stoic, doesn't show much emotion was asked about his ukrainian ties. Cuz. I guess who born in Ukraine. So there's a russian general I think a war against his own home country. And the report is that he was a sword his composure, which is uncharacteristic and that they saw a break in his let's say morale or that is the seemed indicate that he was not totally on board with the war, they just kill them. think about it. Cnn is reporting a direct anecdote of Putin's general.

Being not so up for the war, and then that became a new story and there's a risk that the soldiers and the russian Army could actually hear that story. I mean it's hard, Because her kindness, sheltered by using Putin, was the story about one of his generals. One of his job, Rules say you know so a about the war and he was born in Ukraine. Look like you right, tell me I'm wrong. did CNN just assassinated a russian general? Am I wrong? I'm not wrong they just they just general? Do you think the CNN did this story without prompting, I think the CIA or somebody in the military or the government said to see, and then I got a story for you.

I've got some inside information. We don't usually provide the notes of the meeting like this, but we're gonna provide you the notes this time. If you write this narrative because we're gonna kill we're gonna kill a general with news. I think CNN took him out now. He may not die, but he's going to be off the job. Is he not what we be locked up by today And, if is not only means Putin hasn't heard about it right. They disagree with me. The CNN just took on a general and all Most certainly was a war related move almost certainly guided by whoever fed them. The information. On the wrong. I don't think a wrong. I think they just assassinated a rush in general with the media. I think I think that just now

How many have you noticed? That's the weird part If I hadn't mentioned that. when did notice CNN assassinating atop general. It just happened. It affects our eye. The Supreme Court nominee, is at least one interesting moment in which She was asked to define a woman and then she said well. A biologist and then everybody pounced they said. Wait a minute wait a minute if you have to be a biologist, wouldn't that suggest there's a biological basis for male and female, and that's of course counter to the left's hypothesis, Maybe philosophy that people can choose their gender or that or that less say you're. Let me say it better,

Your genitalia or your reproductive ability does not define if your male or female that would be their point of view now the weirdest thing witnessing well. This is. I was watching thought about. Dershowitz in Turkey with talk about his old student crews, arms, so TED Cruz as to what Dershowitz called an absurd question. so is tell crews who is asking if it if somebody was born with less a male or female genitalia. Could she in their gender? Why couldn't he as a what do you say Latino

Could he change his identity? The black now forget about what the Supreme Court nominee said this is what Alan Dershowitz said about this. like was a little embarrassed? Ted Cruz has been his student at Harvard, and to its I've, been watching for a long time, and I've been quite a supporter of his logic. You can make your own opinions about his personal life and what he has or has not done. I'm not talking about that. You're all welcomed that opinion. I won't even try to influence you just have your own opinion about. Is is a life, but this is the first time I've seen It'll be out did illogical in illogical and public superstar so either the one. I would disagree with him on a topic which it would happen now and then what I'd hear his logic as a oh dammit, that's good logic here he has no logic. Let me walk through it, so he claimed.

that your he agreed with the notion that you can choose your gender, regardless of your genitalia I suggest you says that's a fact, but it's ridiculous to say that you could choose your race. Do you know? Why do you know? Why is why it makes sense that you can choose your gender, but it doesn't makes so you could choose your ethnicity, here's the reason he gave you paraphrase. This is not exactly what he said, but something like this was. Of course you can change your gender because people do it. And, of course, it's absurd that you could change it. That was his argument. His argument, nothing. I can even be cutting the waivers are mad. He was absolutely stumped, and this is Alan Fucking Dershowitz.

Dershowitz is not somebody who doesn't have an argument, and he didn't have an argument of everything simply wanted to it away. Let let let me do the argument in more of one style I'll, try his argument again, but more my my presentation of it. Of course you can change your gender, and all the people have done it, and he actually argued that people Gender reassignment surgery. He says he knows two of them very well and that unambiguously happier because they made the change. And so he argues that, because there were happier unambiguously, he knows well amused is there's no question that the rapporteur there happier having made the change and therefore that's evidence that you can change your gender, because the people who did it are happier.

you see a problem with the logic. Do you see that he effortlessly changed from? Is it a fact that you can change your gender he's change it to people who do it are happier? That's The argument have you heard anybody say, there's no example of somebody who did gender surgery and came out happy Is there anybody on any side of the argument who was ever made? That argument? I don't believe so. I believe he was. He was pretending, there's an argument that people it would. Gender assignment are some somehow always unhappy about it. Nobody makes that argument is, I think, is observable true that some people make the change and are quite happy about it. I dunno what percentage but

I mean, do you doubt it is there anybody here who thinks that nobody's ever been happy with a gender reassignment? Does anybody think that or do you think like in in the back of their mind they wish they hadn't done it yeah. Islam has to be happy about that. So this is a complete breakdown in the Dershowitz logic and fortress. If you will, I mean he's a solid logical guy, but he just he just he just threw it all away on this. Now, I'm going to give him get it back backtrack now and give him some credit. He also told you exactly why he's biased? If some gives an opinion that doesn't make sense. And they tell you why a Year'S- why doesn't make sense? He kindly did that and by the way did that was by talking about his personal friends.

they're are happier and when he says it must be true, because I have personal friends and they said they're happier, and I observe that to be true. He's telling you his bias right, that's pretty direct he's not saying I have a bias because, but if he says, if he says I have these rounds in their happy, and that means something he's telling you. This is buyers so. I'm gonna give him a partial pass for being a logical because he told you I, and there was a human reason. It was a human reason is a robot reason. He was a human being is, as you know, these are my friends. It looks like, it works for them, I'm going to back them. Yet he didn't say that. But it looks like he's back use, friends and their choice and it look. like he had departed the law and logic for a human reason. I support that.

I support him taking humanity over logic in any anytime really, but in this case that's one, but he did depart logic entirely, because if you can, if you can choose your gender, you can choose everything I think most of you would agree with that, Here's how I think others story about the richest oligarch that still hasn't hasn't been put in prison. I guess and that he is not being sanctioned because he might be a way to help negotiate with Putin. That would be interesting, but I can't see Putin being influenced by any rich russian. It just doesn't sound like that makes a difference. I wouldn't wait for that to happen. Here's my persuasion suggestion for Ukraine you know everything has to be able to test that you can never be sure. Somethin org

but here is what I would have been tempted to do. Ukraine is shown lots of pictures of dead russian soldiers, but correct me: if I'm wrong we see usually one or maybe there would be three hundred spread out. a little area that send a picture or a video, If you see videos of individual soldiers dad. does that make you worry about. Let's say you know, there was a soldier? Well, yes, but you I'll tell yourself lustrous, you know there a million soldiers, that's that's one, But suppose Ukraine there's a story of one city, that's having a problem with all the corpses, so. the city, that the Russians attacked, unsuccessfully, as the as the as the snow is thawing. There are a whole bunch of bodies. They have to deal

And here's what I would have done as horrible as it sounds. I understand this is it sounds horrible, remember swore I would collect up as many russian bodies as I could and I would pile them in a in a mound, but I might buy my fake a little bit. I might put something under the pile, so it looks like all a pile of dead soldiers, but that you can tell clearly is lots of individual dead russian soldiers and then show don't show. Military, throwing them on the pile, show the townspeople collecting them and dragging them up to the pile and throwing them on, and if you were, russian mother and you ask a video of a pile of russian dead soldiers and you saw the locals, not the military, not the military. You saw the low

goals, tossing them on a mound like firewood. That will change your fucking mind. Now let me give the Ukrainians, and vice apparently, they ve, talked to Israel. By Israel must have kept from them their best technique. Have you ever seen the holocaust picture? That involved? One person are we done here? Have you ever seen the Holocaust picture that evolved one person? Well, okay, you have but yeah. Yes, you have, but so celebrate. Let me withdraw the question. Of course you have, but that's not the main persuasion. The main persuasions groups write the stuff that moved you, the things that moved you was the group pictures the group deaths the group incarceration. It was not pull starving people, so the Ukrainians have somehow not use that technique.

I suppose, there's a risk. It could backfire could backfire because it may maybe it would make the Russians more willing to fight. So they don't meet their faith. I dunno, but it seems to me that the the propaganda of Visual persuasion is being completely blown by the Ukrainians, cause the ones these into these are selling the story of a rarity. Let me say it again: if the visual persuasion that they're sending is here's a dead soldier, here's one tank it sends ate, it sends a message of rarity of those things. If you show piles, it sends a message of volume, their missing the persuasion. Here, it's gonna be a volume that they've got a cell, not not individual anecdotes. There was a russian warship, I guess it was a transport carrier for troops and tanks and stuff

got blown up in one of the ukrainian ports to which again, I ask this question: how hard is it to blow up a ship when it's on your shore or imports. I don't know much about war, but wouldn't that be the easiest thing you could do if he had the, Equipment I Adidas shoulder mounted rocket of some sort I don't understand why there's no such thing as remote, controlled, drone torpedoes or are they How big would a? How big would a missile have to be to put a king hole in a ship if its below the waterline doesn't have to be that big doesn't mean have to be a special type. I think have have to stick to the hall and then then, op, something so probably need some science on it

who says radio control doesn't work underwater does GPS? Does GPS work underwater? There are drone subs, but we don't have much information on somebody said here's the question: are you telling me that America does not have a drone sub, that you could carry legal actually carry? It might take two people or something, but that you could carry And just drop it in the water and sort of aim in the right direction and it would just blow up something a mile away. We don't have that. I feel like we do.

Is there anybody here who would know if such a thing exists? Somebody says torpedoes go about more than a mile okay, but then you've got the aiming and navigation part of it's too far. We do but the Ukrainians don't well. That's the question: isn't it we do, but the Ukrainians? Don't? Do you think they still don't we're giving them Neptune missiles she sure to ship or somebody do a Google and tell me what distance a Neptune missile fire from the shore I can reach? German

but a torpedo with fifty kilometer range? He says Scott. Please change the subject. Now, though, because the reason I talk about this stuff is for protection purposes and if you want to predict where the war is going, knowing the technology, I think, is the key cause we we've got to have a handle on the other stuff is clear that the Ukrainians are fighting. It's clear that they're trained it's clear that they're not giving up beyond that. You gotta know what needs to know the weapons alright I will change the subject, Lindsey, Graham as being a theatrical and he's maybe vote against Jackson, because he's mad that I will say. However, long ago it was Janice. is brown. Who is a black woman, the George Bush nominated, so she was turned down by the Dems and now, Graham

I'm just gonna return the favor, because it would have allowed under a bush. It would have allowed the Republicans to nominate the first black woman for the Supreme Court and the Democrats didn't want the Republicans to get that wind is so that's the reason they stopped the nomination, not the qualifications of the judge, not the qualify. the judge and so Lindsey is deciding to basically pay them back now. Here's my decisions. How does that work like? Why was

point so Lindsay does the same thing to them that they did to him and that will make them less likely to do it in the future, or would they be more likely to do it because the other team did it? And now I understand that there is a republican point of view that I hear a lot of times with my phone disappear. That's weird you'd have to sell me the time so somebody's. Thank you. Somebody's going to have to tell me how the Lindsey Graham strategy works. Just explain it to me in words, so so this is what I'm looking for so the lids.

g strategy is to pay them back for what they you act the same way and so because you did that probably the judge will still be confirm, so it probably has nothing to do with this judge won't have any impact. What is this point, and I'm not even saying it's a bad idea, it's a bad idea or a good idea. I don't I don't. I don't connect the dots, so he does this and then the rip is his theory is the theory he is working on that the Democrats will then, We will then see the light and stop act in that way will explain how does it work and do you think that any show that Lindsey Graham goes on you have which typical me, like a fox new, show

I think anybody at Fox NEWS is going to ask them that question. How does that work like what? How does that make the world a better place? How does it make Republicans look better to vote or how does it stop a nomination? How does it do anything? How does it possibly work- and you know I'll say to you again- that the Republicans had free money here, absolutely free money, all they had to do is unanimously put this woman in an imagined the news from that point on from that point on today. I saw the news saying what the votes were. So I guess clearly I got in and like a like ninety two, nothing vote and I think it was Ginsburg. I think she got in there not like eighty seven to three or something like some crazy number,

and then more recently yet and Thomas was fifty two forty eight but more recently has been close. So he says: well, you are not aware of human Democrat motivation. They just said. I'm not aware of democrat motivation, I'm still not cuz. That comment didn't help me, but you know what if it would fit good in that space, a description of the motivation that you think they have that I'm missing. So please, if you think you can describe it in a sentence. I think you can tell me the Democrat motivation and I'm unless this is on the locals platform seriously, these okay, so here's what here's, what the Republicans have missed but not yet mean they can still grab this if the Republicans can find a way to give,

one hundred percent support to a female black qualified candidate Even when they have some questions because they do have some issues with her, but if they can by the way to do that, the Republicans win. Because they always have that on the record and then the next time the Democrats go against the republican nominee. Do you not the every story ass to print? Well, you know we gave your candidate a hundred percent support. That's that, this and they should put the Democrats in to explain why there are not giving honour present support because it even the news that supports the Democrats would ask that question even CNN. What would would make them answer? The question am I wrong, I think open CNN website you know, let's take Jake Tapper.

I know. I know you, you have your criticisms of Jake Tapper and that's not the point. You don't think that Jake Tapper would ask the Democrats why they don't do what the Republicans did and say. Okay, we know which way this is going to go. So, let's just show our support. I think he would ask. I think it would ask- and I and I think the Democrats would have a tough time wrestling with the question, so I think the Republicans are making a gigantic strategic mistake to die at the altar of fighting instead of fighting smart. Let me give you this advice: fighting smart, excellent idea, excellent idea fighting because you think fight,

It is good that idea that idea. Let me say it again, because I know a lot of people are missing this good point. Fighting when fighting is a good idea to have a chance to win. You ve got a good strategy, good idea, good idea. Fighting when you know you can't win, and it's only going to make everything worse. This will surprise you bad idea thumbs down. That's my advice to Republicans fight the fights you can and once you can't win, take a win any way you can get it all right. That, ladies and gentlemen, is bringing us to the conclusion of

the best live stream. There has ever been broadcast anywhere in the world at any time to anybody, and I ask you this so far. I have been completely able to identify as a black says. Have you been surprised that I've got no push? from anybody, because I keep saying it like prominently in public and by the way I will say it. I will say it on national tv. If I'm doing a book to or something if I get it, I will with national tv- and I will say it completely straight- I mean I'll- tell the Ot say the reasons cause there's

hidden? The reasons are, that is my option and I kind of I like it. I dont need to give you a reason. I just have to prefer it and now it's an option, so I prefer it. I know it's an option. It gives me very discreet benefits if I should choose to take them. So, for example, if I were to use I know for some government program or something that let's say it, the favored minority applicants for loans. I would sign up identify as black. Nobody can question it because those are rules and I would get those benefits. Am I wrong I would now. I wouldn't specifically do that it's because I'm rich and I wouldn't yeah, if you're rich, you don't want to use a weasel way to steal money from black people. That'll be like the worst thing you could do, so I wouldn't actually do

But there have to be situations that will come up in my life, in which I Delphi is black, might be an advantage. So I have that option. If you doubt alleged lack there's somebody here identifying is a six foot to stud. I accept your identification. What I think there's somebody tell in American on here says they're just glad I don't I don't. If I tell you, I can feel them I see where I see where you going with that. I see your point. Alright. That is about all I have to say today and I would like to leave you with that Youtube. Thanks for joining us best show ever.