Have not been up to, though good morning, everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization, it's cold coffee with Scott Adams and May I say that this will be the best one of all time we're going to do. The simultaneous first and then let me tell you it's going to go skyrocketing after that skyrocketing. I tell you never be.

and all you need to get this going as a cup or mug or a glass I'd, take their shells just I began to enjoy flask vessel of any kind filling with your favorite liquid, like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine into the day, the thing that puts a tingle on the back of your neck. It's called the simultaneous sip and a lot of simultaneous things are going to happen. Right now, go. Yeah, that was that was perfect. Actually, so here's an update on my air quarantine situation, update update. Listen to so saturday was my first symptoms that doesn't positive when the home test. Today is wednesday.

And I feel not just a hundred percent better but better than I have ever been. And here's why I realized the other day, because idle online side conversation That some part of long covert could be confirmation by us right. You think you can have these lasting symptoms. Than anything that ever happens to you for the next ten years. You say well cause of the govind I'm right. is going to imagine yourself into every symptom you symptom going to have anyway, being long covert. Now, knowing that that's the case, what would be the defense And I have employed what I call the spiderman man reframe. I don't know if this will work out, but it seems to be working so far.

the spider man refrain goes like this. Not every mutation is bad, sometimes It's superpower, and so, instead of looking for whatever you negative health consequences, I might have in the future and saying well, I think, there's my long coven kicking it I will look for anything that looks like going a little extra well for me and I'm besides, I think that's from the covered. for example, just today I was thinking, is it just me, Do I look a little extra sexy today and I thought it's not my imagination. It's the long cove. It is starting to kick in with some benefits. Thus, the first one I mean: that's the obvious one. Probably a lot have you noticed as soon as you've signed on you're thinking. What is it is a. Why is he a little bit sexier than simply happen? Yeah yeah, it's called

David spider, man, edition superpowers now you're also saying: why is he funny or why is this a better show today same reason, save reason, long covid, spider, man edition. Some people are going to get the. the low energy all kinds of bad things supposedly, and they are not framing this right. They're, creating the wrong future for themselves in this simulation so If, as we go on, it seems to you that I'm smarter better happier or only those things, it's not your imagination, ass, the long overdue taken in spider man. In addition, Maybe there's that whoever it is that's in control of the truth, with low

to also limit hate speech as a dangerous combination? Isn't it because if I just said to you hey, maybe we should have less hate speech and that that's the only variable less hate speech, that's good. Your first instinct might be a I'd like a little less hate speech. But what, if somebody else's in charge of deciding what day speeches unless a worsening of the world, so restless, little pole here said, found out that fifty eight percent of Democrats say the federal government should take action to suppress online hate speech

But, as the view is shared by only thirty one percent of republicans and voters not affiliated with either major party, so fifty eight percent of Democrats want the federal government to do more about hate. no grassroots, also the ones who sort of georgia the government or a lot of it? So This may the worst thing in the world is at least two things at the same time. Well, maybe you just needed free speech and that's that's the end of that conversation. sir, and then also, I saw your tweet by the Rasmussen account which you should be following rasmussen reports, and this was ably

Right this quote: you can fool all the people, some of the time and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time and I thought to myself that needs to be updated. A little bit safer. You can tell what's missing. it was probably pretty clever back when lincoln said it. I imagine if I'd done there. I was at all well said well said, even if I had been there, but it doesn't age. Well, it didn't age. Well, I'll, tell you why, so give it a chance. If you can hear it, what is missing from this? you can fool all the people, some of the time and some people all the time. But you cannot fool. All the people, all the time well tell you was missing the most important part which matters today.

You only need to fool half of the people all the time. That's gotta be easy. You only need to full half the people. Unfortunately, you could do that all the time we just want agree which half it is, I'm pretty sure it's the half, I'm not them. Can we take a vote? I feel it like this assembly we can agree on, although we all have completely different opinions, all over the board care. We agree that the half this wrong, this ass, a word of it everybody. Can we agree on that right? Am I right yeah, it's the other day If I were to write

ass, a day on what is one problem that with this country and maybe ba the world, the big problem, its other people, as other people, present company excluded, obviously you're a pretty awesome, your browser, and I now I am No, it's really other people other people now. I know they think the same thing, but the differences, the wrong. That's how other people are. No wonder people, though, like other people, If you think about how other people act, knowledge is natural. Janet Yellin treasury secretary she admits that Maybe she was wrong about this whole inflation thing. I thought I was a little bit more transitory and I was

I just love the fact that her last name is yell, and why we ll yeah. Do you think that caused her to have to modify your behavior at all? At any point, in your life, I dunno, if that's a er er bore name or if that's a married day, but I'd hate. I hate to be a woman in a powerful position and have a last name, a Yellin adil all the elements of a guy- I wasn't even say he of all the elements that gives us a funny photographers, browser singing, Women always say now, though, I have personal experience, europe but correct me. If I'm wrong. but don't women always say that other judge moorish partially, is there if their tough in business

Here's JANET yellen's shoes at the top of her game and business treasury secretary, doing pretty well add their last name as yellow. I wonder if she had to be extra soft and she's still scared. People, like you you've, been told to you've been called to the boss, the office, the boss, yelling. Well, I dunno. If she'll be yellow, I mean that's her name yeah I mean just she just sounds scary. I wouldn't want to go to a boss's office of her name was Yellin anyway. She said that she was wrong about this inflation thing. How many of you Think she was wrong and how many of you think she was lying and knew it. I guess you'd after now it if you like,

How do you think she was lying in the gods comments? Oh you sceptics. Oh you, this believers, why do you distrust government officials? So, oh, oh, I'm so disappointed and all of you for me, So distressful! Ok! Yes, I'm going to say that we carried minds here, red mine I will allow. I will allow this possible bushes now, I'm busy The possibility is that she's confessing wishes and thoroughly incompetent better job, and I think we should at least give her that

it'll benefit of the doubt? If she saying no, I'm not lying, I'm just really really bad at my job and should never be in this position. I maybe we should believer. No, I'm just kidding she lived. We guess we don't know, because like a dozen near times article now. The important part about this is that is the new york times so near times. Is the paper of record blah blah blah? If they say it is most machu, so I'm not gonna get into an argument too much about what stood the imo Why so near are article says basically that We know now is a masks, do work but mandates doubt meaning that masks, work

except that when you wear them, they don't do anything that you hoped would happen when you wear them, but they work, but they were now. I'm wondering if this is the sort of the difference between the the engineer Lee. Edition or something. You have two views the world. Let me ask you a question to see where your brain is at alright. If you took a screen off a screen door, and then you took a bucket of water and yet ported through the screen with the screen door, you know an actual. cream from here your door, would it would stop the water a say let's say that was your intention was to stop the war. Would it do it? What do you say? Something

now some say: stop some. What do we have some things for owls wireless up? Some say slows down right. Well, so I guess it depends how much of an engineer you are- and I mean that in the best possible sense Because I have the highest regard for the way engineers think more so than scientists in many ways is more the practical, the proactive away, thinking and. Here's how I think of it when I imagine pouring water through a screen. If you can touch the screen right after you pour the water, so what they did something, but if you can argue that it work or that you should put the screens on your roof instead of shingles that sort of about argument so

may tactically slow things down. So I think what they did. Studies essay masks work. It did praise of friction, but not enough to make a difference and then the article. Hypothesize is as because people were bad at wearing. Their masks is rising. Nobody, social did socially distance at home. It s all right, maybe it doesn't doesn't matter what you say about masks if people go home and just take them off and do whatever the hell they want to do, especially with their neighbors and their friends cause. I think there was such such massive non social distancing that there's nothing you could.

it was mostly. You have noticed that in the data. So but at least the new york times has said that you can't it's not obvious in the data now, as Andreas backhouse points out, that's not the standard for knowing. If something worked, just look at two places, or even two things you think are similar in different periods of time, Never really comparing the right stuff, so you can ever really vision and there too many variables in our etc, but if you're, making a social policy, that's affecting a lot of people.

I can't really fundamental way and there's not enough of an positive impact that you can even identify it. That's good enough reason not to do it, because freedom has to be the the tiebreaker right. If you can't tell if it makes a difference overall yeah, I think I was afraid of. I might to me. That seems like a no brainer but anyway, so I think you can say the masks worked in some some minor way that didn't matter to the fandom. About about this, for timing, yoda everything, you live in a simulation landed, said design, just just a f with you personally. Here is my situation. For about three years now or whatever is Ben I've been trying to surf the pandemic and play it right

I so early on when it was a the war I want. You went into maximum caution. I never washed I didn't than ever wash my. oh sure, user. I was never worried about surfaces too much well, maybe in the first week or so, I was but. Yeah the fog of war. I I played it that way and I go okay good, even though I you know over, I exaggerated the risk in my mind, I didn't get the virus and was you know just no big deal, but that as we learned yet more and more about it, I thought. Ok, my best bet is let other people get the vaccination first. Wait as long as I can without you, in the virus. Before I get the vaccination before even decide, I decided I wanted. I could afford to travel basically now getting the vaccination in my case never made any differences forest

can tell. In other words I believe I got a vaccination. They gave me a risk of a vaccination. However small, I dunno what size those, but I can tell at this point because I actually didn't contract that, and it's unlikely that the vaccination would have stopped me from contracting is that I got the that. I took the risk of the vaccination, but now I know that it didn't benefit me doesn't mean it was the wrong decision. It just means that when you buy insurance, you don't always catch on fire. So if you think of it as an insurance policy, it wasn't wrong it just now. We know how it turned out yeah it was. My choice was my choice. That was katie. That has already says. The key thing here is that was my choice. The whole time that I decided to not get the the second set of boosters, so I got the first to the pear.

And I said to myself: oh now, this armor crumbs coming along now with the underground. Once I get that cause, I probably will everybody will. Then I've got the armor the the delta, the alpha behind us, I think, and that I've got, omicron immunity it's better than having even in the back station cuz, apparently the vaccination doesn't do much for omicron and like just yesterday, I said to myself. Finally, finally it's been a long young, long search in the swamp by reached the promised land I survived on the ground, which was easy. Now I've got natural immunity to the thing: that's the one, yesterday the day that I achieved my goal of the ultimate immunity in the perfect timing,

We also learned that there's no such thing as natural immunity for on the ground, if you haven't heard that yet allow me to say fuck, you fuck me and forgot Was because that was the one thing that we were hoping for, the one thing we hope for. As if you get this fucking thing once your dad or maybe twice and up, but now it turns out the ass if he ever this. This is bloomberg address tweeted yesterday, so you can see that my twitter feed, so this is brand new, apparently there are so many different, I'm a crumb variance they get One of them gives you no protection from his cousin and you're not likely to get the same one you got again. I mean you might have some protection

when the the one you got. But there are so many out there, it's basically it wasn't. It was a jimmy kimmel who got on the crown twice this month. You've got twice three weeks and apparently that's going to happen to all of us. Apparently you don't get much natural beauty now for Obama Clinton. There's too many else right now. What are the odds that, in the very day that I recovered from the virus and had my yeah my dreamed of ultimate, you know I'm done with it, never have to think about it again. Immunity is the day they find out, It's not real. What were the odds? Are that really feel like the eyes of our low monkey box of mixed monkey books. I will ask the currently where, The

there's a story, but I guess it came out with one nobody's pay attention the news. that there are some hacking voted. All these two electronic voting machines. Typically, the ones who are tested is not to say these are the only ones, but the ones that they tested first were from a company called dominion. I don't know if you've heard that name in reference to voting machines, but apparently there were vulnerabilities, which could be explain. Now, I'm quick to say that there is no evidence that any dominion voting machines were in fact exploited as a that's, not the claim nobody's claiming they were exploited. Indeed, no court has found that any major

fraud happened in twenty sixty none, none of it was proven and, as you know, if you look in the wrong place for something and he used the wrong sensor to find it and you don't find it it's not there. That's where we ve been taught and that's what I believe. and so with a debating machines. While there is no evidence whatsoever there any untoward happened. There are concerns. There are concerns and. There are at least assumed it. Some suggest that these were bad enough, that a vote could have been changed, but. What we are not told is whether be any way for a vote to be changed their we wouldn't know about or be able to easily know about. I guess

So what I dont know is, would it be detectable? Is everything is every possible that you can do to one of these vulnerabilities? Are they all detectable? Now? I think the company said that their occur procedures would have caught all of these problems. That might be job, so I actually also feel bad for the the company. So let me let me give dominion a little bit of support here. I don't feel like their side of the argument. Mcgann shown in this article and all so. about social or- and this gave from was a bee writers. Like a like to hear their side of the argument? What is the worst vulnerability? Maybe they can't tell us because it makes it even more

but I love to know what was the worst vulnerability. and then, if they say they have a procedure that would have you know made that vulnerability, not such a big deal anyway. What was that procedure, and if somebody had gotten past it, I would you know, there's just some basic questions like that, but they might have good answers to that. Right otherwise, I may say yeah, you know, I hear what you say, but there is no way that could have happened and years. Why? Maybe those? I always thought that the big ability in voting systems is the human beings? Isn't it I feel like an insider to do sort of anything. Maybe the two insiders you might or might not be possible with one, but maybe you need to.

So I always thought that to imagine that any system is on hackles, pretty unrealistic. So now we know that the voting machines are hypothetically, less secure than one would want. Well, in the surprising us Stories day, that salmon attorney guy that there was being charged in the interim. For alive to the fbi for say that he was not working for Hillary Clinton, I guess when he brought the russia collusion, lies to the fbi and the spending What I'm seeing from, I don't even know if this has been so that's unfair, the at the narratives. Let's say I've seen on fox,

is is that it was a dc, jury and they're all democrats of Hillary Clinton supporters and there was no way the saucepan was gonna get convicted, even though the evidence was clearly clearly shown. Lady, like now. I dunno. I've been having a little bit of trouble with that so one hand of I believe believe that d c jury would always pardon a democrat or often enough. Then it could explain. What's going on within the plausible range, I think. Does it mean is true, was within the plausible and the other? The other possibility is the I've. Never once a seamless story explained accurately above

how about the reason that I'm surprised is that I've never once seen the real news, what? Why would you rule out if you are, surprised by the verdict. Isn't one of the possibilities that you personally have never seen the real news then. If you saw the real news, you'd say: oh, it's obvious. He was a good, be convicted. because what what the hell was the defense did. They have to the news I saw was, that is yes, he lied end of the story. That's all I saw

I never saw even a on defense. The defense was no. I did, and I thought the evidence was pretty clear. He did that's what I thought. What doesn't does that mean? I saw a fake news or that the it was a fake jewelry, which is more likely. It was a fake jewelry they just didn't even follow the law or that the news I watched it. Maybe some of you two were so fake though, we don't realize that the jury had a perfectly good reason to what was more likely. I feel is more likely that it was fake news I was probably a little of both meaning that whatever the defense did never got to my ears, but I like the air, so the defense probably put up a reasonably good defense after I think that one of the facts I heard before the cab

I'd over was billed not alaric lengthen the cab ride over to talk to the us, like? I will. What does it take to get reasonable doubt? It could, it's just one of those reasonable doubt things where, if it were the case, is based entirely upon was somebody was thinking. Is that it cause, I think, to be honest, I think I could have gotten them off on that. If it'd been me, If I'd been the lawyer, I think I could have gotten them off as a you know, it really just sort of depends what you think he was thinking. That's another standard for convicting somebody, some version of that. Maybe that's what it.

Alright, so a lot of smart people are saying that the it was probably a jury problem and I do not discount that, but also don't discount, that there might have been the defense that you just didn't see, and maybe it's just corruption. I would say, that's a good possibility, but if you thought that democratic would gig red handed and then prosecuted. It looks like that didn't happen. Maybe they are ready, ended part But europe is amazing that during the this is fox reporting to anything. during the course of the trial Robbie mercosur clim campaign manager. Actually justified they, Hillary Clinton, approved, disseminating the unproven and debunked information to the media.

so we actually have a court testimony by Hillary Clinton's campaign manager. Does she literally was the king pin for the russia collusion hoax, the most dangerous hoax ever, but perpetrated on the american people etc or other houses? I guess and. And somehow the sun, our ok with that, just go on? Oh? Well, I guess we know that now, so see that's the way, they're handling. I thought was fascinating and and said this before, but see cnn became really entertaining again. That's because I learned to read it differently:

now I really for what the official narrative is trying to be likened to watch them. Try to turn a narrative- and I really looking for news anymore- is more about, like a peak behind the curtain, to find out what the powers. Do you want, but, as a personal letter is trying to trying to hey this as not a gigantic travesty of justice. The thing about sussman not being convicted ed. so you're right said she I goes for years literally dollar. As a system that Hillary Clinton engaged in a purposeful conspiracy designed to keep him out of the white house.

So he says it's like is now going to debunk this, but that's the part that we was proven to be true as work. Then robbie boo testify that that was true, that Hillary Clinton did engage in a purposeful conspiracy designed to keep about the way out, but the way the solution set up. It makes you think they now he's going to show you that that was proven to be true. and then he goes a programme to it, but of a bar. the girls tuesday assessment was found not guilty of the lying charge. So now that says, the verdict is a major defeat for durham and spoke about, It remains to be seen when bubble vas unthinking the richest tied together, two things that were related So he starts out by saying the trump made these claims.

and then he says that this one specific senator charges against assessment, sussman didn't hold up. But during the course of the trial, what trump was proven correct right, because Robby mook confirmed exactly. Didn't we learn that the lawyer did work, for the campaign is just not the lying to the fbi, part that was the problem. We barely got away that so this weird, like the the amount of gas lady here is is so ahead shaking and so massive that you don't want to do with it like your brain heavily process is too big. Big of a gaslight you just go. I want to think about something else. Now.

So, apparently, is not ill is not any kind of a crime for Hillary Clinton to have created a hoax about russia collusion with a political candidate that could change the course of or promoted change the course of history. Let me ask you this. If the united states had not been primed by several years of Hillary Clinton lying about russia colluding with trump. would? We have been back in ukraine as vigorously now like it feels like the united states, who had been primed for an anti russia situation and then an anti russia situation. Hey guess what they came up, so it feels like we are yo. Hilary has been involved in a long game against prudent and prudence been along, gave again celery.

We're just sort of the the innocent bystanders like we're were just drive by victims as they're scraping each other every few years, but suppose suppose it was a crime for somebody like Hillary Clinton, to come up with a completely fake hopes and try to sell it to the fbi and the one thing to just say it on tv. You expect your politicians to lie but to actually get law enforcement involved to take down a president. What should be the penalty for that? If that were a crime? It's not apparently, apparently, that's completely legal, but what should be the penalty if it were a crime? Well, I'd do a little twitter poll, twenty percents of death. Twenty one percent said life in prison ten years in prison. That was the most popular

I was fifty six percent, so basically, we've got the the the woman who would have run or would have been the president, if not for trump and fifty six percent think she should have gone to prison for ten years for the way she handled the election. At least people answer my poll not exactly a scientific one, so I guess that the Biden administration is now clarifying that they do not wish to remove putin from power. Indeed, rather than thwart Putin's ambitions and remove him from power, the new plan is to give him a large part of ukraine yeah the valuable parts.

So not exactly a success and by said, we do not seek a war between nato and russia. Button wrote as much. I disagree with Mr Putin and find him actions and outrage, the united states will not try to bring about his ouster in moscow. Do you know what feels like happened now, I'm going to go full conspiracy theory here, but sort of eisenhower style, meaning not really does it feel as if the military industrial complex just needed something to replace middle east, wars in afghanistan and they had, and they knew that we had all of this old equipment that needed to be used up before anybody buys new stuff and that

The entire ukraine war was orchestrated by the industrial military complex and it was it was about nothing but moving inventory and that. The reason the Biden has now pivoted too well, maybe we can work with this putin. Guy is because the military industrial complex literally can't make any weapons faster than they already are, meaning they don't need any extra war. Now we have just the right amount of conflict because all of the weapons makers or cracking out weapons as fast as I can replace the stockpile. Will the stuff that went do you grade? Is it a fucking coincidence that the real world happens to correspond exactly to what one could imagine would be the best interest of a specific industry? How is adequate instance? So if you are to follow them,

Hey, I would say, look at whether our you know our weapons makers are operating at capacity if they're making you know drones and missiles and replacement tanks and everything else and in handheld missiles what he called the shoulder mounted stuff. If we're making that as fast as we can so that there would be no benefit of having any extra conflict, you should expect they will negotiate some kind of a deal. That's where the money says we're going so Let me summarize us: there are two things we we learned this month. One is that everything you suspected was true. Everything you suspected was true. Hillary Clinton was was behind.

The russia collusion hoax voting machines are vulnerable, as you suspected. And inflation was inflation was always. It was always alai. Mass mandates, don't work. Button somewhere drugs. All the things you thought were to have actually be been shown to be true. So that's number one. That's the first thing. You've learned everything you suspected was true. Weird, Number two: no one will be held responsible everything you suspected was true. No one will be held responsible. None of these stories have anybody getting going to jail or right, whose who's. Gonna lose jobs or anything.

Who lost election election job went to jail, better, take it or leave it every one of those things are, you thought maybe were true were too now that doesn't mean that the twenty sixteen election was rigged. That's that's a different topic,

I'm not saying that I'm saying that anything that can be read will be rigged. You just don't know if it's happened yet, so we do know that if these vulnerabilities were the kind that could actually change elections were not I'm not sure, that's true, but if that's true that they were that kind of under abilities and they had persisted, somebody would have rigged an election. Eventually, probably you just have to wait for it. We just don't know if it happened already, and can we get a johnny depp verdict today, please can we you keep saying at twenty? Sixteen, oh sorry, twenty twenty! Yes,

Two thousand and twenty election- we don't know about the two thousand and twenty election yeah. We did a johnny depp a verdict to entertain us. Well, ladies and gentlemen, that concludes the livestream and I think you'd probably agree that the long coven made this a better show than normal right.

little bit better, and you should start looking out for the little superpowers you're going to get to maybe you'll get a little better, better rest concentrate better, might have a little bit more energy for exercising I'll bet, you'll even diet better. Let that long, coven work for you, I say, get those good mutations working for you and and and that's enough for today, by youtube.