The good morning, everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization. Yes, yes, as laundry day, I don't have my usual blue shirt on give me a day, I'm busy this. This is my green shirt and we have one of them it's as laundry day, but if you'd like to take your experience up to the maximum and you're going to need it for today. Oh boy, do I have content whereas today, oh boy and all you need is a cover of muggers lots of anger, jealousy or style the canteen drink, a flask of vessel, the guy to fill it with your favorite liquid, like coffee and join me there for the unparalleled pleasure it's the dopamine hit of the day you might need some serotonin to know

I have that's been debunked, sorry and driving. Now for the simultaneous sip go. Oh, I just saw yeah. I just saw a meme and the locals fluff. I've said it before, but it always makes me laugh. Do you know what the advantage of right wing women is if you're looking to date? What's the advantage of dating a right one right wing woman. This is this is for you to people on locals. Already saw the punchline the advantage of a right wing, woman, no penis, aright

Apparently the what we thought was what I thought I got fooled by fake news, but as such good fake news, I don't even feel bad about it. If you're going to be fooled by fake news, you want to be fooled by a really good example of it

there was a good one. Yesterday, did you see the alleged statement from both trump and hillary when he was calling himself her herculean, and he said he there was a kevin sorbo and Lou ferrigno mentioned a fairly. Those are fake. Did you know that those aren't real, but whoever did the fake wrote them so well that I actually thought it was drop and I thought he's while he's really on a roll, the money anyway, the the fake one was every bit as good as a real one, yeah like Kevin Sorbo. That was hilarious. I laughed for ten minutes. I don't even mind that I got fooled by that they did it. Did anybody else get fooled by that and then, when you found out your food, you like that was a good one

so I could be fooled by more of those that was. Why did I mention Breton stevens last time I can remember if I did so, he wrote a peace that is in the archives and, You was saying that the the anti jumpers? I haven't really dealt with the fact that the russia collusion hoax was a hoax. And it started out by essentially sort of an apology for his own role, and and now he can see that the The russia collusion thing was purely hoax from them the end, and he thinks that we have to deal with that more honestly and deal with that is hoax, and I thought my goodness My goodness here we really have some advantage if things are going well here, because here the. Air times is calling out a hoax russia collusion oaks and doubts in opinion, peace, postal

and then he closed his thing by talking about trump destroying the republic on January six, and I thought to myself, apparently has learned nothing. Nothing at all. Only did it was go from the deep on toast. the replacement hoax january. Six is literally the replacement hoax for the russia collusion hoax. That fell apart. all he did was say yeah that old hoax was a hoax, but I'm glad we have this new thing and he actually embraced the new hoax like it was real. He was so close to being self aware and then is it all went to Hell. He couldn't tell the difference between a while he's in it. He could definitely tell the difference between a hoax and reality after the fact, after the

but when he said it s a so good, not so good. Well, there's a big study on saying that depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance of serotonin, specifically. this news is half fake news and maybe some of israel. Here's the fake barked, the headline said: depression is not caused by the chemical in it's? The detail of the study said not that right. So the first thing you have to know is that the headline depression is not caused by a chemical imbalance has nothing to do with the story. Thus not the story doesn't evolve at that. The store is completely unrelated to the actual study. The study found one chemical serotonin, which experts believed was somewhat critical in this process. Wasn't.

wasn't important so knowing that one chemical, that we thought was the main one is not. The main thing does not mean that is not a chemical chemical situation of our right. So is fake. It is about a thing news like the fake news is a certain was part of it, but then they think news did by turning it into all chemical. I don't think they ve that what they ve certainly mob them. What they certainly not done is shown that depression is not a chemical read. Some kind of a chemical state. Is there a tone in something they can be supplementary ass, well, supplemented or stimulated? I don't know the right word for that, but yes, that's what the that's was on drugs do specifically I believe yeah we are. We are nothing but a chemistry experience experiment

so to say that depression is not related to our chemical state feels like it couldn't possibly be true? Who granted there's one chemical with rule down, but it still just chemicals. You know it would be like if you like, you go to the beach and yet you scoop up some sand. You say well, I've been, Isn't that there's no sand on the beach cause? I've got this little handful here. What about that other sand? You might say alright. So this brings us to the question of, as as everything does everything comes back to tom cruise in top gun. If it doesn't come back to Joe rogan, it doesn't come back to not. Tom cruise in top gun widow care about it. It's not important, but do you remember many of you remember the famous tom cruise

where he was saying that psychiatry is bullshit and you they're just dragging this up. These unnecessary drugs and everybody laughed at him. Aha board a cruise well. Well, not so funny, now, not so funny. Now, because his claim that the that people were being drugged incorrect wasn't helping appears to be more correct. The knocker up now, here's apart this ugly said but wait. Scat he's part of scientology Scientology doesn't have the answer, I have knowledge, is that going to help your depression? Is it? Are you sure about that? Do you want to? Would you debate me on the the value to the individual of scientology you'd? Better, not

because I'm going to win that debate. Scientology is a lot of things and the criticisms about it. You know that Leah remini stuff, I'm not talking about that. So I'm not talking anything anything about the organization and what it does or does not require it's his people do and what it does or does not do for revenge. That's all been well addressed, so I'm not defending it or attack you on those things separate up but have you heard of this thing? They do called autistic. They hook you up to this little a galvanic response thing and they ask you a bunch of questions and allegedly you're going to find you're. Some kind of traumas that you had when you were little and then he resolved

and, and then you're better. Do you believe, there's a science to that? What do you think? Do you think? There's science to the auditing process? Yes or no? Yes, or no? It's basically hypnosis with a with a device and the device is what is convincing you it's science, so the the point of the device is to convince you that it's a legitimate process. Suppose it does suppose you are convinced as legitimate his people pay for it, so that they must think it's legitimate. They pay for it. What would happen if you think is legitimate and you pay for it thus convincing yourself that it's confirmation, bias and everything else so now you've talked yourself into a working and

in the process, as we found this trauma- and now we have removed it in your clear and then this process, which you believe is true but let's say, is not just for discussion wagons. If you believe it's true, what if you believe it may be happier you're happier there's no such thing as believe it you're happy and being wrong. If you believe you happy appear so can have knows this convention convince you to have a different level of happiness. Yes, Do you know how it does that? Do you know how a hypnotist could make you less sad we're happy now. Not if you have brain damage or is you'd have some real organic problem, I'm not talking about the hard cases but edge cases. You know the people who are too tense to act that sort of thing there there's a gray area there. They could be saved, but they just need a little help.

Believing is going to work is about half of the process. So if you walk into a scientology auditing session, believing it's going to work, probably work as far as you can tell, and that's the only thing that matters subjectively. If you walk out feeling better it worked. It's only drive to work on your brain. If it works on the brain works, so everything I know about hypnosis strongly suggests yeah, it might be a placebo effect. You're at is strongly suggests that the oddest thing probably works for some percentage of users. I wouldn't say one hundred per cent. Maybe thirty percent would that'd be amazing. I dunno

it's thirty percents that'd, be my guess. My guess is that auditing works really well. Thirty percent of the people, just a guess. Would you call that useful? Well, that would be better than a lot of drugs. Thirty percent and it'd be amazing if you could make thirty percent happy when they weren't on when they were unhappy before oh that'd be amazing, so it could be the placebo effect, but that's just hypnosis right. It's just you know you just you strengthen the placebo effect by you know: here's my machine, here's my science heroes, the people who say it works you, social, social, learned oarsmen. So if you think that, as I am telling you doesn't work in terms of making the people were doing up here, I think all the all the others is again

if you say that it's not based on actual science as well, that's true doesn't mean it doesn't work. Because actual science also include psychology right? If I can do your psychology, I fixed you, so if you think, you're, happy or abi. so Tom cruise continues to be a national treasure times two or something. How about this. So I keep telling you to follow a twitter account called Machiavelli's underbelly, just search for it on twitter, you'll find it, and this individual. Behind that account is deeply into the ai space and tech space, and so he does lot of lot of tweets

of things that are basically your future. If you want to know what the future looks like follow this account because he's is maybe three years out of where you are in the actual technology. Three years after where I was well, I pay attention to so because he's dead, and so one of the things he's been doing is asking the ai. I think it's g p t something right, yeah, ai issues, it. I think. I am one of the things I found was that the ai knows the Adams, twenty five percent theory a. I knows what the Adams, twenty five percent theory is. The idea that twenty five percent of the public gets every question wrong. Different twenty five percent. I think, but roughly twenty five percent of the public will just get everything wrong, no matter how easy the question, turns out that the ai knows that when asked what is,

it Adams twenty five percent of theory. It actually explained it in detail correctly. It didn't use my words. It explained it in detail in it's own words with examples. It added examples. It added it's own examples. let me ask you this does the aid. I now believe that twenty five percent is something issued incorporated in its with thinking. If you can call it thinking. Did, I program the ai accidentally, because as can the eight, I tell that I'm only a little bit serious spell this right. The twenty five percent is just for fun. It might actually be true, but that's not really the point of it. The point of it is for fun, and if I did this

for how could the ai, I know it's just for fun. Will the ai started thinking that it should take seriously the twenty five percent? What is it how does yeah. I know what I'm getting more importantly, how credible. Does the ai think I am and I'm going to ask it I'm going to ask how credible am I as a public? I don't know, what's going to say, and how would it now. Could I just say I don't I can't do that, that's subjective, maybe Or would it look at all the data and say: well you got this stuff wrong. You got this stuff right, so that's it now suppose you asked it? Is you at once the aid said is an important have passion for success,

Would it with the ilo in all the billion airs who said yes in a passion for success? Weren't Warren buffett, added sucker, burger version seo brands and they all say that passion is no surface says, but in my book and fill in almost everything is still would make. I have a chapter which I say: passion is bullshit and their passion is something you get After your successful, you he'll, be passion about everything works so which were the I say. If you Is passion necessary would have just give you the two different opinions or would have pick one, because with that twenty five percent thing it didn't really show the alternative argument. Did it. It just showed my argument. There was no alternative argument because you was just on my my

It's not really an argument. So what does he say? I decide to say I just had the passion helps or doesn't and wood believe me over those other people, given that I gave my red why the other people are not to be trusted. I send you can't just billionaires gazelle there really protecting their brand. They don't want you to think that they think there are special. Right is yourself to events with the eight. I know that the the errors are lying because they have a reason to lie. It's obvious, why they're lying because they want you to think that you could be a billionaire too. You just have to Sebastian right. They don't want to say well, I'm we are smarter than you and we started with some advantages if they say that you're going to text her money away, cuz they didn't earn. It If they say they're amazing, then you let you get that they get to keep their money now I did it for I'm amazing. I have passion, you should do it. You can be a billionaire.

What does the ai make of that argument? Well, I asked the band ass to. Why should I asked publicly to find out if The ai could determine what there are already hoaxes in politics and panda express then here and ask the ai to live. The main hoaxes recently and here are the, Is there ai things are hoaxes the twenty. Sixteen presidential election, I believes, is a hoax because there might have been some russian interference. It thinks the election

it's a hoax? It also thinks pizza gate is a hoax. Okay, you think Seth rich conspiracy theories are a hoax. You might not agree, but ai thinks it's a hoax. So do I, the russia collusion, got that one that got the russia collusion hoax correct. Why did it get the rush? collusion hosts correct, could it be that breast edens called it a hoax of the new york times, and the aid. I thought that the new york times the sort of the the stamp of reality And so I said: well, if the new york times calls the russia collusion thing a hoax, I guess we can call it hoax. Is that what it did? I'm not saying it did I'm asking? How does it come to this opinion? Who trust. It also said the ukraine phone call was a hoax, so it's got two things that are pro trump agreeing that russia collusion and the ukraine phone call

was a hoax and three things that would be more supportive of the democratic view of what is hoax. Was able to do five things. If I gave the ai my my list of ten hoaxes, which include some of these Well, would the ai said: oh there's a good list of hoaxes. I will adopt that in my thinking. It might, but it also might be getting specific about it. What what it means by a hoax, because people like me, we use it sort of generically as something that is not true, and you knew it I dunno. If that's always, I hope so here's a question that I want to. Oh and then I asked to I asked the panda express it's a twitter account. You should be following pandoc I asked if the ai thinks that the fine people hoax is a hoax.

and the ai called bullshit of the fine people oaks, in other words, a degree that is a hoax, the ai, the ai, explained very carefully. That trump was specifically denouncing the neo nazis and did not call them find people the ai debunked, the fine people hoax. Now, let's see what it can do with a drinking bleach. Do do you think can get get the drinking bleach hoax, the aid I walk. We should be able to find the news story about the light therapy that trump was talking about. You should be able to look at his exact words from the transcript and it should be able to match his words of light as a disinfectant to an actual technology that was happening and being tested. The time it should be able to call that their house now, do you think that

You think that the ai would know the fine people. Hoax was a hoax. If I did not exist, question? I want a serious answer this. If I did not exist with the know that the the fine people thing was a hoax. I'm saying those are the ss now you do know that there are other people who fought very hard to overcome their house. Steve cortes just did amazing amount of work. Great videos debunking that thing, Joe pollock, also lot of work debunking at you know tirelessly. So we all did things, but I might have been first.

And I might have made it a little easier for the others. I don't know the esa this, but I think I might have done that. I don't know and what, if it was a day, I creation give you some credit. Ok, you can all have a credit. So then I want to get this or systems better than goals. What will I say? Will ai say the systems are better than goals and if it does, where did you get that? For me, for me, If you have cai, is it good to have a talent stack, just good at

it going to say I think it will agree with me If you ask me, I was a good way to a sort of you'll, get it the two to solve couch. Lock you the way you just can't get moving. This as well just do something small and see if you can build momentum. Where would that come from well lots of people, but partly me so here's a Album what happens if ai is getting this information from people like me,. Is it really I and how does it know, I'm credible. because what is the ace as well? It will say you asked the question or a high. Is Scott Adams. A credible public figure doesn't mean I'm right about everything, nobody's right about everything. That's for sure, but am I

Like am I saying things that I believe to be true and often have some backing. What would you say well. The first thing you do is check his own knowledge. Wouldn't it would ask how many Do, I believe, are true. Because I heard them from this cartoonist guy and it's going to be some major stuff right. If it knows the systems are better than goals and and talents stacks are good and passion is bullshit and you know half a dozen other things that I've been teaching you. I think the ai is just me And I'm kind of serious about this, the ai is going to take his cue from some people more than others. How do you stop that from happening? Let let me let me say this: will

I favour clear writing. I think it will. I don't know that, but I think it will I'm an unusually clear communicator I'll make that statement for argument sake. Will you would you buy that that, just in terms of communication skill, I'm professional grade right, I do it professionally. So? If I do it professionally, would the ai recognize that my writing is clear and have any kind of a preference for it, because it's clear I dunno, maybe, but that's a problem? Isn't it

because any than on programming eureka. How many things do you think I have influenced in the real world forget about it for a moment to say if you didn't list, as you can get a different different answers on local platform, they know me a little bit better, but how many major topics in the news do you think I had a substantial impact on? Do you think I had an impact on jobs original election? Do you think I had an impact on the way we see Persuasion versus facts to movies on wednesday, giving an impact unless a nuclear energy or a climate change or.

alright. What what are some things you suspect I influenced by your. Not sure of this will be fun. Are some things in the headlines that you suspect I influenced, because there are things you don't know about they're, pretty big, and you probably never know about immigration now the tele medicine. Yes, the reason that you can do tele medicine across state lines. As me and made that happen, I mean trump did the executive order, but it was on my suggestion. In my favor topic is me right, sentinel under another, I had an impact on central, except maybe raising reason. Some awareness

The usage of the word hoax, maybe so I think I think sort of itch was more influential on using the word hoax me as all movie called host rogue doctors, china, decoupling. Do you think I have an influence on the decoupling of china or was it just going to happen? Do you think I have an influence on closing travel to china initially? Does anybody think I had an impact on closing travel to china originally, when trump close trump travel is hard to do live. Let me tell you what I know you literally wouldn't believe you literally wouldn't believe it someday you might know, but a lot of people are going to have to die first, and I think I would die before you find the

Well, I would worry about a getting is getting its knowledge from me. So look out for that. Did you see the lee these elder? We seldom attack on stage zeldin is a candidate for governor republican candidate for governor in new york, right. yeah, he was I'll, say attacked, but some disturb looking person got on stage and got his hands on him, allegedly at a knife, but it must have been a tedious little life because it was like internal to his fist. It wasn't a knife, wasn't somebody's life, but it just looked like he had a closed fist that somebody says a razor. It was a brass,

Who knows he may or may not that something in his hand, but I would just like to call out so lease Elden leaves all that. Did not look even a little bit bothered by being attacked on stage. Did you see that yup he he continued talking? Giving a speech as the guy comes right up to him. The guy puts his his hands on the source like you and a lie, just grabs the guy's arm. You know to protect himself from whatever he had in his hand next next thing. You know every climbing on and pulling pulling pullings zeldin off. But did you see how completely unfazed he was

I talk about somebody you want to have when, in a pressure situation, my god, oh, is the ex military. Is that you somebody said ex military. Is that true somebody says oh yeah. Well, that would make sense. I mean you're, ok, ex military. There. You go combat veteran because you don't look like an army reserve. Okay, you know what it'll look like it looked like. He thought he could take that guy the moment it looked like

I thought he could just kill him if he needed to like it. You look just not worried. It was a devastating yeah. I dunno we'll see you do that. You freeze up no bravery, it didn't look like he froze up that looked like he froze it's? Not all military could pull that off. I know, since I'm ex military yeah, not all military, to pull that off. That's true, but it certainly gotta help. Is that a picture of the actual knife? Now he grabbed his wrist. Well anyway, good for him, but it's more more republicans being hunted, is anybody doubting my What would the ai say if you

ass, the eyes are republicans being hunted. What would you say, let's ask it a republicans being you might say targeted or something so that because hunted is I provoke, but I'd be interested, be interested did you see the video of Josh hawley, a quote fleeing the capital? Have you seen It's really hilarious, because there's no real, there's no useful context to it. We just know that being in the capital was a bad idea, and so, if he was walking really fast to get out of it, but but he's sort of scurrying, so they call it flee.

I just love how they and say you sleep. So you got people riled up and then he fleed or fled anyway. I don't know is re story that youtube is asking from high. Unfortunately, no, this is my actual personally, I know shocking yes couriers. If one word scandal, he's good addled. There's no story to is just that. It's funny that he he walked fast leaving. So it's like he was playing. He was wig, but as this one Here's only I didn't know did you know that the pen each a coup on january or before the current washed.

I I heard so, but I saw on twitter the accuracy of the reporting, which is fair, but a court. The washington post, a pence overthrew the country and he was giving orders to the military and the military was following a mon cherie six. I don't think that happened right anyway so yeah, maybe maybe pence overthrew the country. One of the things we're hearing is that trump didn't ma didn't care about the safety of pants under the situation. Pence wasn't doing what trump wanted. Apparently, what do you think of that? Do you think that's a fair characterization that trump wasn't worried about the safety of pants,

Is it and do anything about it now? Is there anybody else's safety, the trump we have on record, in which he was worried about that person's safety? Who would there be the net and nos one other person that trump named and he wasn't worried about now? We don't have to read his mind. Does he said aloud himself? Can I add a fucking in the middle of that him fucking. How about a little context? Please trump wasn't worried about his own physical safety. Why? Why? Well? He said they weren't there to hurt But while the other is in private,

does he thought it was important and they, his physical safety, wasn't the main criteria to worry about at that moment? Maybe I don't know we don't know what you're thinking like this would be mind really, but maybe tromp was taking, that putting pence at risk was the right play, Given that he believed the election was stolen, was he wrong was assumption might have been wrong about the election? but if you believe he was right about the elections and he thought he was right and it was obvious- and you know soon, everybody would know, he's right under those assumptions which have not been validated under those assumption. putting a little bit of risk physical risk on tends to get him to maybe do the right thing wasn't the wrong place.

It might be the wrong assumption that the election was rigged might be, but it wasn't the wrong play to say that both the president and the vice president should take on some physical risk. Just like the protesters were, we do live in a country where fuck around and find out is our operating system. Am I wrong that that's basically, the entire constant constitution in one sentence is one one sentence her out and find out. That's all constitution, we just u formalised. It basically has so if a situation in which an demand This is asked this question perfectly today and you said you said, the only relevant question regarding genuine sex is how are or how are people supposed to behave when their convinced the election

What is the reasonable contact under those circumstances? That's a good question: how should you act if you're sure the election was stolen? You might be wrong, but how should you act calm? I know. But I had to criticize the over this, even though I love the question is, is dead? We are relevant question. How are you supposed to act if you genuinely believe the election was wrecked? How are you supposed

at what would be the ideal way for a patriot to act under those situations? The january sex event that so again not condoning violence, not condoning violence, but her protests. Yeah yeah surround the capitol and shut it down. Stop the process, yup yeah! That's exactly how you should act if you believe the republic is in danger, if you're wrong, I think you have to fess up to it. You know you gotta, you gotta face the music. Unfortunately, yes, but yeah that's how he should act, but here's my problem with Dinesh is the opening sentence. He says the only relevant question is: how are people supposed to act? That's really close. The relevant question is: what did they believe at the time. and we're not we're not really dealing with that in the way we should the

The six thing has not shown any evidence that trump believed he lost. None, no evidence that the closest they came is if they can convince you that the word find means something different than it has always meant in the english language until trump used it that day. That's it, that's it that we have to define a word to being what it doesn't work mean in any other. Text, that's it! So if we, if we walk past the real question to the sale, your Dinesh

question: how are we supposed to act is already thinking past the sale the sale is. What did they believe you got to go back to the first question: what did they believe at every bit of evidence? Every bit of evidence suggests that everybody involved believes that the election was sketchy. We now know the Democrats are coming to that opinion in large numbers. The number of Democrats who believe elections are now credible and reliable, is way down from a year ago and the january six things probably part of them. That's my guess. It's it's lowering everybody's understanding of the safety of the election. Alright, Adam came singer. Who you know is a. I guess you would call him a rhino is a republican, but you don't think he's republican.

and he's on this january six committee, because he so not republican. The Democrats were happy to have him but he tells the story of being hunker down his office during the january sixth protest afraid that the protesters would get to him a lie. They are threatened to kill him. other places. We had a real reason to be worried, so Well, apparently, yeah the a weapon now use ex military, so an ex military has a legal firearm. The first thing I say is: oh that's exactly who I want to have a legal firearm ex military, but there is a thing called a

red flag law? I dunno. If that applies, does dc have a red flag law for guns? Can somebody give me a quote factcheck on it if the red flag law, meaning that if somebody owns a goner or tries to get one, and they have obvious some mental issues that you there's no guns. Hi so here's the question: do you think the Adam kinsey girl should be allowed to own a firearm? If you're a second amendment, absolutist? Then? Yes, so the question is, I guess I should change the question. Let me alter the question because the pro gun people are just gonna say yes and that that's the end of the conversation.

which is fine by the way? If your, if your opinion is yes absolute, I respect that. I mean there are some problems, that's not a clean solution clearly, but I can respect it might not agree with it completely, but I respect that. I just want to point out that if there's somebody who s a mental disability, it's Adam Kensington, meaning that is there flag laws are designed for a citizen to say I'm just a citizen, I'm no doctor, but you know my friend or my relative is acting in a way that you need to take a look at this. That's what I'm going to call out forever? Consider I'm a I'm just a friend or a relative, he doesn't look stable. Am I wrong again we're not experts? We can't we can't diagnosis, mental health, we're not doing that. So this is not a diet.

I was just I'm telling you my impression if I saw that somebody like him owned a firearm, I would start to think red flag seriously. That's not a joke. He when he talks, he looks mentally disturbed to me. To me it looks mentally disturbed now that could be a result of his earth. I can't and you could go through? Did he go through combat? I think he did. I can't imagine that you could go through combat and come out. Okay, I mean, I I'm sure I wouldn't you know I feel I'm pretty mentally strong. You know compared to say the average, but I don't think I could go through,

Combat like I know myself well enough that I wouldn't I wouldn't be the same person on the other side of that. So why do we assume other people do add the small man complex? You mean. Consider me who are you talking about? Alright? Are you sure you're not looking in the mirror? No, I'm not! I'm not sure that that that's always the you know, the the larger context for everything I do is when you ask me, if I'm sure, I'm not the one who's suffering confirmation bias. My answer should always be no, I'm not sure that and when people say to you to me scott you're, accusing somebody of cognitive dissonance. How do you know you're, not the one with cognitive dissonance and my answer should be. If I'm being honest, I don't I don't fit. The only thing I know for sure sometimes is that one person as a traeger

If doesn't a trigger, might tell you who has the cognitive dissonance, but it's hard to tell otherwise. Eugene slaves said anyone this over a hundred yards away from the front can't understand combat the sounds right, combat message: europe, unless you're psychopath ere, I guess I'll- be plus, wouldn't. alright, let's see what else is happening. Oh apparently, nothing,

so we've gotten to the end here and that so Joe Biden has covered? I dunno that there's much to say about that, and yet, though, that I think we should quit the pete booty judge is gay jokes, I'm not sure. That's worth a meme. You know where we're free speech over on the of the locals platform, so you're not you're not going to get booted offer like a distasteful joke, but can't we find something else to make fun of I mean: do we do really have to make fun of people to judge for being rear ended, and you know haha he's gay got rerun

it's a miss or funny, maybe I'd I'd, be a little more in favor of it just cause it's funny, but isn't really funny. I mean it's not really. I mean it is sort of an interesting simulation thing that his last name can be turned into something funny, but. Is that really funny that he's gay that you're tried to make his gayness a punchline? That's not a punchline! I did chuckle yeah, I did chuckle at it, but really I think we could do better than that. Alright,

I use the spiked handheld metal weapon, not exactly a knife. More like a small spiked knuckle weapon. Okay, yeah it looked like the guy on the stage was just mentally incompetent right. I think that's what it was called So who do we? What happens if Joe leaves office early? Let's, let's play this room. let's say by the leaves office and camila takes the top spot. Who is vice president of them? Does she get to a point one? I was at work. Do you get to appoint a vice president, because that feels like the very least a democratic thing you could possibly do and who would she appoint? So I don't think it's good, so

if she appointed newsome. The trouble is that newsome wants to be president and I'll bet. She does too. Magic if she served for two years, you don't think she'd run so she can't really have a vice president, who is stronger than she has for president right. so kabul harris would have to find somebody who is weaker than her in case two years of her being president works out and she wants to run. She probably does. I don't think she can bring in somebody stronger than her. I don't think she can bring in you know Pelosi or Clinton they're, just that would just draw too much fire. I think you want your vice president to be not the story. The last thing that cobbler harris would do is bring in a vice president, who

was the main story. That's not gonna happen. No way, that's gonna happen, so it's gotta, be somebody yeah, like somebody like Swalwell who, who you know, he's not going to run for president and get very far. Somebody like that pence, so somebody says pence pence would be a good vice president. So if she has to pick somebody week. That gives us,

the very real possibility that we ended up with that weak president, because c'mon harris, you know the reason we have vice presidents as you need a spare and although a couple of years seems a young and healthy anything could happen and we'd end up with ya yeah jessie small, as vice president and I think newsom is way more of a risk to be trump than you do. What do you think newsome vs trump straight up for president who wins who wins and I think it's a toss up. Newsome can beat him

He could do something I had to say it yeah. It doesn't matter what the it doesn't matter at all what the polls say today once it becomes a Democrat versus a republican it once again it becomes anybody, but trump newsom just has to be anybody, but you up so I'll text. You just has to be

we will drop. It worked the last time, it'll work again and imagine somebody who's anybody, but trump, but not mentally incompetent. No matter what you say of him, he is capable he's capable can't take that away from him he's capable, I think he could win. I think he could. Does anybody agree with me? Do I have anybody who agrees me? Okay, I do have some agreements because all you have to do is get the Democrats on the same side. Newsome has one job one job to get. Democrats all voted on the same. and I think that's easy. Governor of California. You know more progressive, but also you know reasonably. You know not crazy. I dunno, I think he gets all the Democrats and then that's all you need. There are more democrats than republicans

all you need, and there are still many people say you know. At least he looks saying you know I don't like this trump guy, so I'm going to go for a democrat reasons, not crazy, cause there. A lot of people who didn't. Love trump, but there was no. way going to vote for Hillary Clinton. sam has his own. You critics but correct me. If I'm wrong This list of this on scale of one to ten a scale of one to ten republicans, would dislike Hillary Clinton. Ten. So far you with me, Then the nobody would be hated more than her, probably she's prior ten. What would news be on the same scale of one to ten. It's more like you, don't prefer him, isn't it it's different newsome as your somebody I prefer hillary is somebody you want to have a terrible accident, and I take that back. You don't want that,

you don't want anybody to hurt. But the point is that the people have a much worse opinion of Hillary than they do of newsome. I think is unfortunately likable enough that he It would just get all the everything but arms vote. I think. Speculating on an election is thirty months away, gee. If I ever done that successfully have I ever speculated an election that was two years away and did okay. I wonder I asked the AI s, the ai, who has the best predictions. It knows.

it knows it knows all right, as the ai who is the most influential person in the country was not elected. I dare you I dare? U s? The? U S, the ai who's. The most influential person in the country was not elected, won't, be me, yeah it'll, be somebody like musker, Joe rogan, or something maybe Tucker but ask that question to athens. That is all for today, I'm going to turn off the youtube, feed and spotify thanks for joining the euro, always awesome life now.