Everybody welcome to the highlight of civilization. Coffee was got out was where from nimble, positivity. everywhere else you go today will be nothing but addiction and bad news. But here here it's addiction and the good news. You will be addicted to the good feeling that we generate today and all you need to take it to that good place. There's a cup or a bug or a glass of tanker jealous, as neither canton if last of us kind fill with your favorite liquid, like coffee enjoy, after the unparalleled pleasure to be the other day, I think makes everything better. Was it called? Yes, the simultaneous ap go. Oh so good!

Somebody noted that I seem to be able to remember other things, but I can't remember the the copper mugger glass thing that I do. Every morning, there's a reason for that my memory doesn't store randomized things. I can only store things have context, so I can remember a joke, for example, because if I remember the concept of the joke, then I just connected to other joe. And then it comes out, but I don't have any mechanism for memorizing random stuff, so I could probably go forever without remembering that. well, let's talk about all the things, so early, the January sixth narrative has completely collapsed and the narrative was we're going to prove to you the trumpet knew he lost but try to take over the country anyway, as they approve in that

as they show any evidence at all anything nope. not a not a singles until I have evidence of their primary claim. The primary claim knew he lost. He was trying to take over the country anyway as been proven only been proven. I would say it's been debunked. Because not only did trump not try to take over the country, or at least there's no evidence of it. But how do you explain that don Jr wasn't in on the plot? Isn't that the funniest part to be a demo? that you have to accept that Don Jr was eleven on the plot to take over the country, hadn't even mention it to him. I seriously

wait. How can you hold that your head is true? Yeah trump was tried to take over the country. You know who we never mentioned it to Ivanka and don Jr did mention it didn't say, but didn't seem to think it was important. Come on. The narrative is so completely destroyed at this point that it. It appears that the Democrats are trying to trying to tell you that that wasn't really the narrative, the real narrative is that he didn't do enough to stop it, and so the january six people have reported that there was a one hundred and eighty seven minutes in which he did nothing to try to stop it. That's what the january six committee, Still telling the world now, one hundred and eighty seven minutes.

That's based on nothing they made up, they actually just made it. The new york times and the washington post both have timelines in which that's not there. I think there's about a thirty minutes before he spoke and said everybody be peaceful, go home. Thirty minutes is basically the time it takes to decide you to speak Alright, so the actual evidence that the new york times the Washington post, their timeline completely debunks. The second main point of the january six series that he didn't do enough

yes, and he also tweeted during that time and twitter took down the streets. So what do you think is the proper outcome of a hearing in which the primary thing is not proven in fact debunk the primary claim that he knew he lost and he was acting to organise a coup that has now completely de buck by the people who are trying to prove a true. It be one thing if republicans debunked it, but the Democrats just debunks their own theory by not. by looking as hard as they could and producing no evidence whatsoever for it, but how much evidence do they have for their waited? Two hundred and eighty seven minutes claim not only no evidence has been hard debunked by their own side.

Now. What do you think should be the outcome in that situation? Do you think trump should be charged and jailed for what has been totally debunked? Probably not. You probably don't think that. Do you think that he should be

well, let's say punished by voters for waiting for one hundred and eighty seven, eighty seven minutes when it's now proven by lots of sources that that never happened. While here's what I think I think the members of the january six committee, unless they correct it, cause I'd, give them time to correct it, but if they don't correct that they should go to jail now, I don't know what the crime would be, but if you, if you're, pushing a fake fact in front of the country that changes the nature of politics who could run who's going to be president

That's that's so close to insurrection or treason, or something like I dunno if it's crime, but if he asked me what what would be the what would be justice justice in this case would be the committee of themselves going to jail not being sanctioned not being sanctioned actually going to jail. I'm talk about some serious jail time now, that's only if they don't correct the error that by now they notice an error. If they stick with the he didn't do anything, I think they have to be jailed for what insurrection I mean if they're trying to change politics. by an obvious you're, clear lie that won't. There won't be any question about the fact that it's alive at the end of today. This is his attempt to change politics without using the system,

If you're trying to change our politics without using our system and you're, not transparent about it, it would be okay if you're transparent right. Is it the stuff mark Elias dad? Allegedly, you were getting some rules change before the election illegal. You can you can hate it, but it's all legal, you know the other side should do it too. Is legal you'll get do as much as you can this legal, but if you do something. That's clearly outside the system and you're trying to change the system. I think jail time. I mean, I think, that's a real conversation after that, I think, loose change and you should be looking at jail time same as can kinda figure for this now again, if they correct themselves today, they have plenty of time to do it. But as a correct themselves, today as say: okay, okay, that's a mistake- maybe it wasn't mistake, but willing to you know a forty eight hour correction. I'd say: that's good enough. I dunno. If it's sedition or treason insurrection.

Whatever it is, but it's certainly the crime that they're trying to find if they're looking for something that looks a lot like a coup they are at. They became the coup. Maybe they didn't start that way, but they became the code. Is there trying to sell the one hundred and eighty seven minutes. What do you make of the fact that probably the most important question about january six, is who doing what about the security of the capital. Who is doing what you know? Who did what and when to protect the capital and that's primarily, policies, responsibility, isn't my wrong. Nancy policy was in charge of security for the capital, and is she not testify, as she been asked to testify shouldn't they re us here and

Look, you know what to do know when and what did you do about it as you ever even been interviewed about it as she ever? I suffered interview and just an interviewer of any kind. Just in the news said you. What did you do? Why didn't you? Why didn't you do this? Why did you do that? How do we just sit here and watch this like it's? Okay, us, okay, I mean billy. The railroading republicans you know Whether the question about republicans being haunted- I mean here it is this. This is a pretty obvious case anyway, and I think the food supply is going to be ok Here's my optimism for the day or you worried that the countries around the country or the world, I guess, would run out of food. It looks like it's not gonna happen Now part of it is a big story that ukraine,

russia signed a deal in which the the grade would go through a turkish turkish ownership or something briefly but basically they found a way to ship the at least a lot of the grain from ukraine. Now that stop, you know the the full answer and that's not the full answer, but I don't think the country's going to run into of food, and it looks like our shipping situation at the very least they would. They would prioritize. it's the food for shipping right. Does that happen, I'm assuming that if you're a port and you've got one hundred ships waiting and one of them has food on it, it goes first right if it's something that would spoil is delayed. We have about two years under these windmill policies. I dunno what you're talking about.

Look at oh, it's delayed, you mean the the food shortages delayed. No grain was planted. Ye. Do I've got a feeling that the food shortage thing is exaggerated. Food ships go to bulk terminals, so they have their own. Their own path. Is that what you're saying. I dunno it's just my feeling that we're going to get past the food supply problem and you might not even notice it. You might notice a few things. Sir no disagrees disagrees with the food shortage thing.

a slight out. So this is a good test of the atoms law of slow moving disasters know you could argue that one year is now slow. Maybe that's too fast says this is good edged case. I think, is long enough that millions of people made a millions of adjustments because they see a common right. Don't you think that other places are planting more grain sort of expert ex food issues for twenty twenty say I think they'll be food issues so deftly be issues. I just don't think this good masturbation. This is just to be problem. We have to work with it. I think so, let's, let's compare our predictions, so my prediction is that food shortage for america,

We have to make that difference right, for america will probably just be prices higher, which is plenty bad, but but that's what it will look like. I think I think there might be. You know you might have a a country that for awhile things get tight, but I think we'll figure it out. Alright provocatively? I tweeted that so far, the january six hearings have proven trump was guilty of the crime of leadership. That's what I say I say trump was guilty of leadership And I went on A good leaders do unpopular risky things based on often got instinct. What is the right thing to do and that's what he did everything that trump did on january six, at least the stuff that's confirmed

is all consistent with leadership. Now you're saved me scott, there's, good leadership and there's bad leadership. Well, yes, but you usually don't know about that until after the point where egg grows You're saying this is ridiculous of history before you're the fucking argument. Look you stupid piece of shit. Listened to. The point then make a comment will hide you on this channel? Let the smarter people have a little more time. Ok, so first you listen and then you form an opinion. If you do the opposite form an opinion and then lesson while you're a fucking idiot So you got that goal for you here is my argument, which you have not yet heard: management.

There's a bunch of people doing what they all agree to do: management and supervision management and supervision refer to everybody doing what they kind of all agree should be done, but the manager is just the time keeper and the judge and making sure it could stop. Would you agree. Management is about doing something that everybody agrees. Needs is needs to get done. Leadership is stuff that people don't agree on its leadership. If people don't the gray. Alright, you don't need any leadership to eat a cookie that who needs to tell you to eat a cookie. If you like cookies,. Nobody, you don't need a leadership to do that You only need leadership to do shit. You don't want to do. I want you to grab that machine gun and run toward that.

Run toward the enemy's position through their hail of bullets, and this might not be good for you, but it will be good for other people. It will be good for other people. Thus leadership. Leader leadership is getting people to do things they didn't know they wanted to do or don't quite understand or need to be led to know. If trump was right, let's play a hypothetical we'll start with. No courts have shown that there's any there was any fraud and twenty twenty everybody on the same page. They didn't look for it and they weren't the ripe right place to judge that, but they didn't find a it's true. They didn't find any by virtue of not looking and saying they didn't have standing in most cases, but it's true that none has been,

if that is, you know, quarter court blessed. So we got that, so it really comes down to what was trump thinking. If he was thinking that the that he had witnessed a rigged election, What would leadership require him to do? What would it require him to do? would require him to allow the election to be certified and then let let me ask you this question. if the election got certified. Can you, agent, any scenario I would ever be reversed. Even if you found out the vote had been rig, I can, I don't see any scenario which we would ever reverse a certified election. Would we all agree with that?

we're not in the real world. I mean you could imagine some hypothetical, but not real world, the supreme court's not going to reverse it. It's just not going to happen. Nor do I it should like. If it turned out, it was just a little bit of sketchy in us. I dunno. I think I might defer to the system over the specific outcome. So here's the thing if trump believed it had been rigged What was he supposed to do? A leader probably, would have done almost exactly what he did. Even if you don't like it, I don't like it. I like it at all. I don't like anything about it,

do you know what else I don't like? Genghis khan, don't like him at all, but he was a good leader. I mean good being a quotes. He was effective later. Do you think that all of his mongol hordes want us to do exactly what he told them to do? Probably not. Some of them probably wanted to stay home and do a little farming, but he was a leader, so he got him to do it now. That's an example of evil. Now, I'm not telling you that tromp was right because the light of a leader as if you guess right- and it works out well in your george Washington, if you guess wrong and it doesn't work well and you're a loser, but it's still leadership is still leadership, even if it doesn't work,

What trump was doing was not expected, not normal. part of the normal system. That's the reason, there's a whole january, generous thing right cause. He was outside the system. the system was the only place he had to operate if he operated within the system, you knew what the outcome would be a certified. He only had outside the system. Now is George Washington, a hero or a traitor sort of both Sort of both, but it turns out he was right and he won so george rationally once we gets to be hero and a leader. What if he lost. Would you say it was a later? Yes she was still a leader but george wash

It would have been a loser and history would have judged him poorly. I guess if he lost there's a there's, a troll on youtube who has tried to use my actual accurate age. As my insult, how does that work? What are you not gonna get older? there's nobody here who thinks he's immune from aging. I think you know if you get to my age and you still have a a live stream audience you'd, better, pat yourself on the fucking back. Because we ve ever hurry you, I don't know and you are but you're not exactly making a dent in the universe here. So maybe maybe pick up your game a little bit then come back.

Well, so I dont to defend what trump did or did not do in January six or make that very clear. I'm just put a unit is accurate box. If trumpet had stopped the election lists a delayed if he had delayed the election certification and- and this is a big- if I don't think it would have happened and found out that the elect was wrong rigged. What would you say that I think you'd be here when another words, if he'd been right- and we don't know he was wrong. I would say I would say we probably do know, I'm not sure about this. I think we do know that if they had delayed

the kinds of delay they were asking for sort of a normal on a recount of the votes, probably wouldn't have made a difference right. So I think, if he'd gotten a delay, it would have just gone back to where it was. You know they would have. They would have done. The recount would have been the same result, because the only things you could recount are things that got counted in the first place. Can you recount a missing ballot? How do you do that? If a ballad never makes it to the yeah? I dunno. If there's a way to do that, but if a ballot never gets run through the counting machine, how do you recount it if it's just gone, how in the world can you know an election was rigged You can only know you didn't find it. They always say you can now. Isn't it finally problems? That's all you know, so I would like to argue that what has been put

by january? Six is a trunk did what a leader with a strong intuition unproven, but a strong intuition that he needed to go outside the system to fix a wrong, and then he did. He didn't fix it, but it looks like he operated on. And I would say we don't know his assumption was wrong. We only know it hasn't been proven right so at the moment he is still in the. In my opinion, in the what is the catheter half dead box? What's the name of that? Why am I blanking on that? The cat is half dead and half alive? That's I shoulders or scalia is sort of a schrodinger's cat,

if you knew I was thinking well, then you know if the cat was alive or dead, but you don't. You don't I mean I assume he was say he was right, but the january six people I think he assumed that he was just lying. No evidence of that. All there's something weird thing going on with the word gruber, twitter, and so it is, as you know, the a lot of people on the planet. Alright haven't using that word gruber to refer to people tried to teach young children about the will save ii. What would I say, the the full diversity of of gender and sexuality. And that the people on the right or say, hey, don't teach our

Well then, all these things there too early leave that to us, thus not for the school to do and that maybe what you're doing is grooming them, meaning making children friendly to some future encounter that maybe they would not otherwise be friendly to is that growing? Well, and I think it's a it's a stretch of the word, but I would not condone it. except that it really is just through the response to racist. Isn't it groomers just their thing that when you get called a groomer, you can't get it off, because the accusation is as good as the fact same with a racist once you've been called a racist and a guess on the internet. It doesn't matter that you're, not

that's irrelevant so same way. It doesn't matter if the people being accused are actually groomers, that's their attempt or anything doesn't matter because the accusation, you know this is damning enough. So. while I disagree with the usa- and I don't believe have you ever heard me- use it- I've never called a groomer having a belief. I've never used that not in the tweets, not in the library. It's not something, I would say is not in my domain of things. I would naturally go to I'll talk about it, But I'm not going to call somebody because at that assumes something about their inner thoughts. That I don't know is evidence. But here's what the weird ironic thing is

as the january six hearings have probably made it a guarantee that trump will return to office. That's my opinion and my opinion. In my opinion, the january six thing here, let me explain and they'll all digress back to the groomer thing. I've told you about the Gerry Spence he's a famous defense attorney Retired taoism and if he's still alive, I dunno he's pretty old, but he taught us that if you want to wear the case for your client, he was usually working for the you know the person who was injured He takes. The injuriously makes them imagine they're in the place of the person who was victimized, you put them in the story, if you put somebody in the story, they were abandon their logical feeling about the story and they'll replace it with emotions that they got when they were imagine themselves as the victim. and apparently that works pretty much every time it's like a really strong, really strong persuasion,

think what the january six people did accidentally think about all the are there videos they showed like video from within the crowd? They were trying intentionally to put you into the crowd. Were they not check me on that? Were they not trying to put you into the crowd? so you can feel the danger. You can feel the violence right. That was the whole point. They put you in the crowd, here's what they didn't count on. Who did you then, if I with it and by you I mean you like two people watching this live stream, who largely are gonna, be young right, friendlier right, leaning little that most of you not all right. If, if, if you're, a republican or a few words,

supporter and you watch the january six hearings. You say to yourself to things: oh, my god, they're trying to hunt and jail people like me. Just like me, People who believe there was something wrong with the election is. Thus will you believe you say by god, everybody there is just like me. They look like me, they talk like me. They believe what I believe, and they actually they're doing things that I would have done you know maybe didn't go to washington, but I would have right under the right conditions. So who? Who are one third of the country? Let's say the you know the the republicans who are trump friendly. One third of the country is watching this and they put themselves in the wrong people wrong in terms of the intention, of the january six hearing. Their intention was to make you identify with the eyes of the politicians. Think I think are stupid. This is the point

was congress- is showing you this congress is showing this to hope, You would identify with members of congress. Do you they're, showing you the video to get you to identify with a members of congress to feel how they felt when all this violence was happening? Was that smart? Because congress has it like more like the enemy, doesn't it who exactly identifies with the enemy? Nobody, They identify with themselves and they just saw a whole bunch of themselves trying to get something done and being demonized for it now do you believe that is backfiring and that But let me ask you something prior to the january sixth hearings. If you asked me what I support trump for president,

My answer was hell: no to old two divisive time for something new. After about eight weeks of listening to the january six show trial, do you know what my current opinion is? We need trump again because what is happening he's the only person. Who's probably has the balls to do something about it and if you said to me, scott. You know all those things you don't want to happening in all the division. All the things happened to your own career. I made my career got like hammered just by saying anything good about the trump experience. and what I feel is I'm under attack, I feel that I'm under attack bill. The trump is literally the only person who would do anything about it. my opinion of him ass gone way up: it's probably a confirmation buyers,

Yeah man there's a psychological there's, a psychological phenomenon- that's happening in my head that I'm aware of, I am abandoning my rational thought, because they're making me like the Democrats are making me bad in my rash. I thought my rational thought says we don't want another trump. Do you not my irrational thought is it goes like this? You, mother, fuckers you fucking assholes. If you make me, look like those coup plotters one more day, I'm going to give you four more years of trump and I'm going to shove him up your ass, like the gerbil from Hell and I'm going to love it and

it might cost me a little bit more in my career fuck. You fuck, you yeah. It might cost me another twenty percent off my career yeah. If you make me look like those fucking coup plotters again I mean that's your narrative of it. That's not what they were. If you do that to be another few fucking weeks. I'm going to make sure that trump gets elected and I'm going to shove him all the way up. Your ass, like a like a crazy gerbil. Up of you know a b richard years, as allegedly allegedly so just keep begging for it just keep begging for it. You fucking idiots, if you beg for it, I'll give it to you, but you are begging right now. You are fucking begging for this keep begging.

It'll give you exactly what you want so this. I think this play by the january sixers will go in the history books as one of the worst political players of all time. I think they've guaranteed trump, a landslide. I wasn't even sure, you'd get nominated two months ago. I wasn't sure he could get the nomination today. I don't see how he loses. I really don't. I mean it was hard for you to imagine the scenario that he's not president lincoln. yeah so good good job there on bad persuasion, democrats making us try to live. They literally tried to get us to identify with the group as the lowest approval, raising that isn't called the k k K,

right there. I think the only entity that has a lower public approval congress congress is probably the kkk and I'm not even sure about that. It was good by those gruber thing if you it's as if media matters is making another gigantic persuasion mistake. media matters. I saw a rumor. I need a fact check on this, but there there's there were, I think many matters was pushing the less get rid of groom arrests as a social media word and then. Twitter. Twitter originally was banning it, but then I think they reversed. I like how twitter handle this. Actually I don't mind- and you might disagree with this. I don't mind when twitter bans bans right. So now you can. You can hate me and disagree with me for a second before I,

give you my reason. I don't mind when twitter bans anything. I just want them to look at it. Just give it a good look. and then make sure it's compatible with your rules and a gay. That's by the banning, as long as they look at it closely and then make a decision. Then. Secondly, I might disagree with the decision, but that's a separate issue, but that but the question of should twitter, you know act quickly on something that has a red flag. Yeah sure sure I, that actually makes the service better, not worse, cause a little bit of a little bit of delay on a tweet, you know twenty four hours yeah, I dunno that's fine, so I don't mind, but here's what I think they're doing by accident. I believe, I believe, by accident the people. I tried to remove groomer from the conversation

just added another g to elegy bt q. That's not what they're trying to do, but they kind of. They kind of made the case that the groom is about energy bt, to which correct me if I'm wrong, but it's not right. I don't believe I've ever heard. One conservative ever say like those energy, be teaching people I've. Never that once I have heard them say I don't care where european this is, it could be still connected to your body could be in some patriot dish somewhere for posterity. We don't care where it is just don't work to our kids about sex. Am I wrong, I feel, like I'm characterizing the argument correctly,

I don't care where you put your penis or where Vagina is or if you have one, we don't care. You are done if I will watch your brain with care of, say we, but I'm not really talk about. We are they, the conservatives care do that they only care if it affects them, As pacifically that their children and they're, not even talk about the game are now do think that the slim buoyant part. becomes part of the story. If you see an anecdote of that's who's, sending the message forward. So yeah I mean there's certainly overlap, there's an overlap, but I would think there's a bigger overlap in just generic straight people. Pushing the same stuff right.

If every is every, every lgbtq person was magically removed from the story, when you saw the same situation, in other words, wouldn't there be plenty of straight white it's the teachers who still want to give the same lesson. They just won't bring in the trans activists to help with the less it'll be the same lesson. Wouldn't it. Now there is the question of normalizing: Normalizing the behavior get over it? Let us who cares right, everything gets normalized and a normalized. I mean that's, not the thing I'm worried about Yeah, so that the real question is sex education in schools and the

people who say? That is grooming. I think it's accidental grooming, but it probably has that effect. Meaning I'm not sure that you can read the minds of all the people involved in all this? I would agree that it's likely to have the effect of normalizing lifestyles in them, as of children who then maybe more confused instead still less confused. Maybe I'm no expert on this- I don't have the don't, have any kids in that situation. That the only the only thing, I'm glad that's the conversation, Is that I think that the people were trying to protect the lgbtq community, allegedly that's what they're trying to do

I think they may have moved in the other direction by somewhat confirming that they're lumping these groups together that the conservatives weren't exactly doing you know they may have been doing it unintentionally, but it wasn't exactly the point of it all right. There are three groups or entities that Democrats trust to make major health decisions, including healthcare number. One is Joe Biden. The Democrats trust Joe Biden to make major decisions about healthcare, Health outcomes, the others congress, your democrat congress, but I say democrats trusted democratically congress with major health decisions, so They trust Joe Biden without decisions. They trust congress in the third at sea is a little children. Small children.

So that that's the three groups, the Democrats trust with their major healthcare decision them and for other people, not just their. And illegal aliens about that, but but they they trust children. Well, I think the best play that I've seen in a long time is the republicans shift to become the the parent party. And I don't know that they plan that I think it just happened that way yet the grooming issue. You you've got the school choice, issue you've got got the abortion issue and what Even the crime issue, social media damage issue that, although that could cross cross parties, seems to me that that's just the best broadening I've ever seen

You to the extent I believe any Republican could win the branding themselves- you pro parent, I just think thus prepared- is just gets an old them. There's nothing else to talk about it. If you bring yourself pro parent and you have policies it uses as as real, how do you lose? How do you lose that election? I dunno recap and I think he would just win every election after that point, but but you have to you, have to make the branding stick. And I think I think their policies or no eva, even I don't agree with someone. They are certainly consistent with being a parent prepare to approach.

Alright. Now that republicans are seen better on education according to new polls, I might think it's done, oh by the way I forgot to mention this, but I saw Jeff or giza if I'm pronouncing it right, tweet, in which you said that trump's popularity, among republican voters. I guess mostly his popularity was well below two saved us in the beginning of the summer and then the January sixth stuff went on trump just zoomed past? This is only unprotected, so this is people predicting the outcome, so the people predicting because of january sex predicted that the trump would will again instead of predicting that decision,

So as not proof that the january six things backfired, but it's very consistent with my hypothesis that the january six thing was a complete backfire politically yeah, the mole is back That's a call back alright, so bandon got convicted of refusing to testify to congress, even though he is going to testify and the heel appeal that cetera, I guess he could. Punishable by thirty days it's the one year behind bars and a fine ranging from one hundred dollars to one hundred thousand now abandoned, seems to be confident that it will be reversed on appeal. What do you think? Do you think it will be reversed on appeal? I feel like it will yeah like

if you present jets, thus the odds I give it. I feel like you will, and I don't know what arguments are going to make. But it seems like some kind of equal protection thing is a slam dunk because won't they be able to yeah dirty Dershowitz says it will be reversed on appeal. Okay, I'm done I've told you my dershowitz rule ripe. The the Dershowitz rule goes like this, that no matter what my opinion is on a legal question, once Dershowitz tells you his opinion. I just go okay, forget about mine. It will just take us open because there's It is always going to be better than mine on the on anything anything related to law. So if Dershowitz thinks that it'll be reversed, it will I love. Way ban in this handling. This

abandoned? It is a thanking the jury who found him guilty thanking the courts and agreeing that they have the right to verdict, which is interesting if he was convicted he expects to it to be overturned but also thinks that the jury got it right now, that is good technique. That's really good! Technic. The. bad technique would be to say the jury, got it wrong and will reverse of appeal because the jury was only only asked to look at the specific facts. The jury is not an appeals. Court right, It can only look at does allow call say you had to say yes to testifying. Did you say yes to testify? That's it and that's all the jury does, and so he quit.

Accurately said, yeah the jury, thank them for their time. Thank them for the euro taken the day off, but it won't make any difference in the long run. Their their verdict has probably no impact. I think I'm sure you'll be well now the euro. It says it more confident that it will be reversed, But again, if you're, let me ask you this: if you are a republican now, let me say this: if you're a trump supporter. Did the ban in prosecution make you more or less a chump supporter, probably more right, because again, you look a stay of bad and who do you say you see yourself if, if you're, if you were like minded and many of you are and you are,

What's the porta John, for example, you see yourself, that's who I say when I look abandoned. I see myself because I talk about the same topics. Often then, I'm sure, versatile ways. I absolutely see myself going to jail when I see Bannon get connected. So now Although vote for anybody who wants send send me to jail- and I think my best bet would be trump if the limo, let me ask you this is a serious question, so you've seen the treatment of various notable pundit types, if a republican does not get elected again, do you think that I personally have any illegal risk like actually going to jail.

Sorry that some of you are saying yes, a lot a lot of knows well, I dunno, but a lot of assets. Here's the thing! Democrats, if the Democrats are making me feel like I might go to jail But how am I going to act? What what? What is the right response to feeling there's there's a good chance, she'll go to jail for not committing a crime, not committing a crime. But what would be my most

normal reaction to that full nuclear, full nuclear yeah. I've I've told you before. Well, I dunno, if I've told you lately, but there there's an ethical problem with being a trained persuader, and the ethical problem is much like being a professional boxer. If you're a professional boxer, you don't want to get into the streetfighter because you might accidentally kill somebody cause they're, not

I mean like you, so that would be you know that would be murder and in the case of being a trained hypnotist, I do intentionally reduce my power for ethical reasons like like. I could- and I dunno if I want to say this out loud, but I've gone this far, so I will I could erase your free will. If I wanted to, I could erase your free will if I wanted to, but adult because it would. I would consider that your deeply unethical, But if you push me hearted off any tell me, I'm gonna go to jail. What would I do if he said well, you gonna go to jail. Unless you are re, somebody's free will will now

the diff of the equation, if I have to erase somebody's free will to stay out of jail, I will now have free will is an illusion right, free. Smith. So I'd be erasing your illusion and substituting my opinion for whatever it was going to happen, but it would look like I was racing. Your free will that's what did it feel like. so, I'm just going to warn you. Just going to warn you that this old january six stuff, the band and stuff and if they come after me- and I think, there's a non zero chance of that happening. I'm going to go full nuclear, I'm just going to take all the controls off and you've never seen that you've never seen that. Maybe you don't want to. But if I go nuclear it's going get dark. It can get dark really fast and and

will change. So, let's hope we don't see that alright, someone needs to make a list of all the things you need to believe to be a democrat lately. I started list for years you're just list in order to be a Democrat today, you'd have to believe that republicans, love guns, oh my god, they love guns. but they don't bring them to a coup in love guns, but they don't bring them to a coup. Now the Democrats will say of course there were? No. The budget goes out. People are goods that attracted the bustling cash to fuck. You fuck you, there was no guns,

There were some guns that were not brandished, republicans have guns in their trucks, republics, republicans have guns nearby. There were some bad people who had stocks of guns that they are. There definitely sketchy But it wasn't about that right. It was literally a peaceful thing with some dangerous elements like most protests, mostly mostly good, but some battle. If you are a Democrat, you have to believe that- I knew he had lost the election, which is unknowable. You have to believe that trial. alone. Among all human mammals knows the unknowable, which is that the election was fair. Now we do know that, there's no proof. It was unfair and therefore the other system goes

forward and shut it. Should I ve always I've always supported by didn't being certified just as eta want to destroy the system, even even if it got a bad result. I say to have to believe that a trumpet knew the unknowable that the election was totally fair. Totally unknowable might be true. You also have to believe that that trump was planning a coup without mentioning it to don Jr or ivanka to me, thus, the funniest. Let's play a few ever tried saying that to try this out.

Try saying this to a Democrat who believes it was a planned organized coup. Just say you know that the january six thing they prove that don Jr didn't know there was a coup planned. Just just don't let them change the subject. For a moment, Brazil immediately changed. The subject say about come back here from I'm just wondering. Is that your belief that there was a coup planned but trump didn't bring don jr into it or Ivanka. Just watch their face just see if they can keep like anything that looks like a non NBC face when they, after Plain how Don Jr was not brought into the plot? I mean seriously come on. Is that not the end of the conversation right so correctly knew correctly? If we

We have the evidence is a damned you knew was trying to get trump to your call off the air. The protests of me, this very clearly wasn't in italy, do you know one reason that I'll never be put on a democrat platform while this is going on Imagine me saying that in public on cnn. Imagine MSNBC, making the mistake of inviting me on to talk about this I just say it out I just gets, is one question: how do you believe that done junior was brought into the plot and that I would just laugh. They try to change the subject. I'd be that no serious don lemon scuttled that your belief that the job didn't bring don Jr into this is coop lot really really. That's it

You tell us have to believe bill reform works. You have to believe that putin cause the inflation and some other stuff also have to believe that democrat Democrat run cities are just as safe as anywhere else. You have to believe that Biden doesn't have the mental capacity problems whatsoever. He's fine he's five, no problem here. But I think there's a funnier list. If I spend more time on it, I think there's Funnier list of things you would have to believe the two by the narrative but hunter hunters, the smartest, Well, you know, I don't think that's been disproven,

Joe Biden says hunters the smartest person I knew a smart people can be addicted right. Smart people have addictions. That happens all the time because the addiction is bigger than the brain like your brain has no no defence against dixon. So if you said he was addicted, If you said less say he had no ethical core. Those have nothing to do with his intelligence. He can be addicted, he could be completely or more but also the smartest person. The Joe Biden knows cause you, don't the smartest Immoral, morel, addict, would look like to me the small, Immoral addict would be someone who made millions of dollars from an enemy regime for doing next. Next to nothing, that's what the smartest addicted immoral.

it would look like to me. It would look like somebody who had limited coke and sacks and hookers and got away with it lived a complete party life made. Tens of millions of dollars and I did all prosecution if that's selling influences not nothing well, it is nothing if there's no influence, remember people or buying the hope of influence. They weren't binational influence. You can't buy actual insolence and you can only by access so access issues, the hope of influence.

Give me a little it's still up to you yeah, so I don't disagree that hunter might be the smartest person. He knows it's just that he's also an addict which goes to the immoral part right. You can't be an addict and tell the truth. you could rare yeah once you say, addict. lying is just built into the word. Do deal know that. there's no such thing as an addict. To tell the truth, I don't know if they can. I think it's just erased from there Their ability is not even making like a judgment, call. That's that's not even like an insult If someone is an aspect there, a liar it just comes with it. Yeah. You could say that, oh, I know an honest attitude. Tells you exactly what they do? Okay,. now- there lighted, all sorts of those problems

the honest additives. Tell you exactly what they're, taking so as soon as you say, addict you don't have to say anything else about the other stuff that comes with it. It just comes along with it and let's see You know I also it makes me wonder. lying is a maybe indicator of a future addict know. I wonder I know it doesn't work that way near the causation is addiction for. Extend the line, but I always question I always question causality, no matter how obvious it is is obvious that the probable causation is that being in that it makes you liar, but I would not rule out that people have trouble lying like they just kill lie would be less likely to become an added

because at some point you know you have to lie to do it like you can't really get into it in the first place, without lying about that. First, No, I didn't try our heroine, I mean after you have to be working on getting addicted. It doesn't happen on day. One so I feel like you've gotta be a liar, at least by omission, or at least lie to yourself or something. So I do wonder if being a liar, let's say a compulsive liar. You know like a real liar. I wonder if that predicts, that you'll become an addict yeah. Somebody says that's absurd and you could be right. I dunno. If it's absurd, it could be wrong. I mean it could be one hundred per cent wrong, but I dunno. If it's absurd, I think observes too far. Yeah nothing by the way. This is real, good habit so might have

is as soon as somebody tells me, there's a correlation. This clause is this. The very first thing I think is well. Maybe it's just a correlation, not acquisition, that's a! Firstly, you should think then the. Secondly, you should think is: maybe a reversed. Maybe the causation is backwards. Now, not always Not always, can you have an oxytocin addiction kind of kind of yeah if you don't get hugged or loved enough you're going to have an oxytocin shortage, and I do think it makes you crazy. Do you think that not being touched can give you a mental illness? What do you think yeah? I think so I think so yeah. I think that not being touched gives you mental illness, everybody

it looks like it's complete. Yes, yeah it just! Ah, yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, yeah sure! Basically, all of you how many of you are conscious like right now how many of you are conscious of not getting touched enough, like you, know, you're Santos is low. How many of you are low on oxytocin yeah, most of the you now. Some of that is who I attract to this livestream. Now I've noticed that many of you use this livestream exactly how I hoped, and how I hoped is that I would Like your friend, because I am I on your side- and I talk to you- today and even when I don't want to be here, I do it anyway. I don't know that there are days

There are days I wake up and I think you know as much as I love doing this and I do love doing it. I'm, like I genuinely like doing this. That's why I'm right here I mean I've already gone long, probably it's eight o'clock, but I don't have to be doing this now, there's, but I like it, but there are days there are days, especially when I was traveling in the times of news different where there were a few days, I didn't want to do it, but I did it for you, because I know that if your friend doesn't show up it'll affect your day, and I don't want to do that to you. I would like you to have a good So I'm your friend in the sense that

literally every day, I'm trying to help you have a good day. Am I not right now? Of course it's also a business model and I monetize a blog that helps that helps me encourages me to do it everyday as part of the process, but I feel like my primary motivation. Is that you like it? If you didn't like it, I wouldn't monetize it. Even if I could. Some online locals said they lost their dog and couldn't wait to hear your voice this morning. There's somebody just lose their dog, because I have heard of people losing their dog and I'm sorry. I have a very old dog myself and I know that my day my day is soap. Roaching yeah. You see me on David

Well, yeah, you probably know I had a tough pandemic. We all have the tuft end of it, but I showing up here, was part of my therapy to ah it was all part of my therapy. Well, some you helped me as much as I help you so we're friends and let's keep that up yeah. You know I I've heard of people losing dogs and and having more of a problem than losing people like. Actually, probably not that's, not a joke. You know I have a friend of mine who years ago, had a dog for many years and then never got a dog again,

and everybody asked why don't you get another dog? You so love that dog and he said when I lost my dog. It felt like losing a limb and never went away. Yeah, so I didn't understand it until then, and you know I have a dog and I don't know what it's going to feel like when I don't, but I don't like that part about feeling like I lost a limb. So for all of you who have lost a dog by the way I feel like cats are different. I dunno I mean I feel plenty sad when I lose a cat as I've lost several in my life, but I feel like the dog's going to be different. I really do I dunno. Why am I right? I feel like the dog is going to be a Be different feeling anyway, I don't want to on that.

Well, let me give you the positive spin on this. Anybody who is in your life and its positive? It's a gift. Right. You wouldn't and joy having anybody in your life. If you couldn't lose them is built in. You have to have the risk of the risk. The guarantee of tragedy, yes, to have the guarantee of tragedy to make your life have any value at all so don't hate it except it sort of the buddhist the buddhist way I'm bastard but the buddhist way as you don't try to avoid pain like all pain, because life is life, is suffering. You have to learn to enjoy the suffering, and that sounds ridiculous. The first time you hear

it. Doesn't it doesn't sound like absurd? You have to learn to enjoy the pain that doesn't sound like something you could do, and you can you can. Actually doable in in some areas, I've have managed to do it and when you, when you do it like just in the neri, I can't do it like all the time. For my whole life, but there are some times when you say well. Let me give you an example. When I lost my stepson to fentanyl few years ago, I I wanted the pain to go away. The pain of the loss, but I also didn't I didn't because, as the pain went away, then the meaning would go away. I didn't want to lose the meaning, so the meaning was more valuable to me than the pain.

When I started to realize that the pain and the meaning were inseparable. I merge them now. I take the pain of the loss with the meaning and there's just one thing now so when I, when I see my stepson because you see them everywhere, it is not it's not like a tragedy. The feeling is more like positive. Well, anyway, on that note youtube, I will talk to you tomorrow. Spotify thanks for joining.