They could that could happen because there were enough other people who wanted it. Well, probably not. I've got a feeling that the republican party does have a male bias and that the democrat party does have a female bias, but the republican party seems more explicitly. Parental in nature is more about adults right. It's an interesting matchup women, vs parents and you in so many ways. Well by more than forty one margin according to rest was simple. Americans say the nation's problem with opium drugs, fentanyl being the worst of them it's getting worse, not better, and they don't think by and is doing enough. So forty four percent of americans leave that the crisis has got worse.

And just ten percent think it's got better how the world, then, I think the opium crisis gum better, there's more drugs. Ten percent crazy, Oh another, sixteen percent of now sure oh, oh, say ten percent think the opium crisis getting better. sixteen percent are not sure of the math and ten plus a sixteen twenty six. Twenty six percent, nearly a quarter or about about a quarter of the country is bat shit, fucking stupid, while that's a surprise, Alright, so Biden's failing on on that, and I think that the the here's a prediction that I will bank on. You know how

follow the money always explains everything right. Follow the money explains everything. If you look at the opioid fentanyl, situation follow the money? Tells you exactly: what's gonna happen, number one there will be more offence in into the country. Why? Why? Because it makes money so sentinel mentions the united states are profitable. Would you agree that there will be more of them, of course so follow the money. Guarantees will be more, not less sensible coming into the country. Now Have you heard of this thing called the military industrial complex? We don't like it. We wish it didn't exist, but it does exist. does exist as we you ignore it

or the military industrial complex, do if the potential profit from attacking the Tells when from it looks like that would be a smallish operation, what if it goes to a big operation? Suddenly the military industrial complex as woe a new line of business attacking the cartels. That's gonna be big, like the scale of ass, to be big enough that the military industrial complex can get interested right. To be big? Otherwise they will not make enough money, so the federal business will keep getting bigger until it crosses that line them When it crosses that live, the military industrial complex is gonna, have a trillion dollar pay them

guess I to say you know we're gonna have to sell you, some really expensive weapons to take out those cartels and the guard the border. Whatever we decide to do so, the two things are you can guarantee is that there will be more offensive will come again until the problem is so bad that the military industrial complex is a huge profit, at which point they will vaporize. We'll take a few years because to spread that profit now, but they will vaporize the cartels. There isn't any other way this can go because of money, now the cartels will try to make enough money to like you, change something. But but money guarantees that the cartels will be vaporized. Am I wrong is just not profitable to do it yet, but getting close let's say one central des reach: two hundred thousand a year,

Should be the year to maybe five years but There isn't any chance is not going to happen, we'll get to your quarter million deaths a year and then and then the military and the people make money from Sally military equipment will say. Well, we can take care of that for a trillion dollars no will pay a trillion dollars and they will go vaporized cartels. Do you think there's no other way the school go we'll see any force from anywhere and variable. They would change the guaranteed direction that we will attack mexico guaranteed now, should we attack china because there sending us the drugs dotard off? You know how china gets away with it, so presence she said yes will make your offence in all and the the precursors

if sentinel will make them illegal. So you know that that's good right, we'll make that illegal in china, but what they didn't do is make all the variants illegal. So the fentanyl precursor people they just changed the formula a little bit, it's just as bad, but it's not technically the thing that got banned. Now. Let me ask you this: do you think China can figure out how to solve that problem? That their law is not including enough stuff can't figure that out right? Do you think they care if their law doesn't doesn't cover those things? Now they don't care if they wanted. to stop it? They would just go arrest the guy who's in charge. They wouldn't care about which year, which precursors are illegal or legal, they would just go arrest the mother fucker if they didn't want to keep happening. Obviously, obviously the leadership wants it to continue. Is too easy to stop. So

obviously they wanted. Why should we do if china? sending precursors, essentially military equipment to the cartels who are killing americans? Well, I don't think you want to start a nuclear war. I don't think you want to invade, but we need to kill the dealers on the ground. You can Tell me that we can find anybody in china that, with a bribe to go, kill those friends in all producers, we can do a terrorist act and in china you we can set a bomb. Next were a fact. In China we don't have anybody in china who has those you know that ability to blow something up. We should be with those should be exploding. Maybe this I mean. Maybe somebody is, but Where we should definitely be attacking china covertly to destroy the sentinel production,

would that trigger world war nuclear war? Well, that's the risk that china gonna have to take. Isn't it if china wants to kill a quarter million of a year which is worse, gonna go to. And they need to risk nuclear war. They need right. So, yes, that is the risk that they should be looking at very directly. I'd say we got some more ass, lightning, keeping go here. I don't know if it's just me, but I heard Biden talking about again the insurrection that tromp ran. Here's what I hear every time by the elected leader, the united states uses work insurrection,.

My mind, imagines people who look a lot like me going to jail for nothin like I can't I can't on pair those two things, Every time you used the word insurrection, I see him trying to put me in jail for nothing, and I think I made a turn today because it is one thing for him to say insurrection before the january six hearings have concluded is another I to keep saying insurrection when his own hearings, while all sciences, it have shown that there was no insurrection or planned insurrection or actual insurrection. Once I spend debunked if he comes television and says that again he is targeting me. That's how I feel and if my target, if my president targets me a law abiding voter who just says

maybe different opinions. If he's targeting me and that's what I feel then he's my enemy is now my president anymore, Now would be one thing if I were breaking the law. If your government targets you cause, you broke the law. Well, let's does on you. by use targeting me for something specifically that we now I didn't break any laws. and he least putting me in the same boat with anybody who who thought that the january six thing was not so bad. The violence was bad, but in terms of it being an insurrection versus a protest, I'm taking, Personally from now on, before the january six group debunked the insurrection charge, I was, the to stand as well. Who knows, but now that is debunked. This is personal.

And this is Biden against citizens its against republicans. Basically- and this is the thing the Democrats continue to do- they're, not targeting policy or preferences, are targeting people, and this is a direct earlier, so that whole dark thing shark eyes, Yeah Biden did how shark eyes like I saw that is there some room with his eyes. but it does feel like the precursor to hunting republicans. So let me say this: I don't feel Biden is even a president at this point just a malign force, because at all these capable of doing the job who knows what's what's was behind it, but.

This is personal now, so I want the republicans the Democrats to know that they their walking up to alive and they ve already crossed the line of making but let me let me say this as menacingly as I possibly can there another alive and you're, getting really flocking close to it dear that There's another live another lie you don't I'm talking about, there's another line and you're getting really fucking, stewart, and if I didn't warn you how fucking closer to that line, Feel it I wouldn't. I was not doing my job as a patriot, you're really flocking close the line you better back up back the fuck up. It's ok! If you make this just political, political, ok,.

We were all used to that. You can lie this political, but when you start painting half of the country as insurrectionists, that's that's a line. You need to back the fuck up off of okay, and we need to be as clear of this as clear about this as possible Lines, ok, we accept it's, not ok, but we accept them. Politics is good, were words, words, a good fight hard in trying to game the system as all ok, but you can really the line and his last speech was dark, chilling and directed at citizens. In my opinion, that's how I took it. I took it directed as citizens. You direct your shit as

The citizens, who are law abiding and we're trying to do the right thing and positive I think generous. Six was people tried to do the right thing they didn't. I think they drive But I don't know how I can say this more carefully. There is a line back the fuck off it. Are you with me? Is this just me: You say the line to write. don't pretend there's no line, there's a fuckin line and back the fuck off, and what I, when I say back the fuck off it I mean with the insurrection talk. You need to correct that Mr Joe Biden and Mr Mr Democrats, this isn't play. Yeah you better than the political play field, and that's ok little, but a play

probably even lie it's all part of the political process, that's good as loans, talking politics. As long as your insulting politicians. You can even. I don't mind if you make some like jenny, all statements about Republicans or general statements about Democrats now, Yeah yeah! The Democrats are socially yeah yeah, all the republicans. Are you don't want to want to control women whatever? That's fine? That's all fine!. but you have to know there's a fuckin line. And if you don't see it.

don't say you weren't warned you make this personal you'd better back the fuck up. So that's all I'm saying somebody needed to say about. Oh, alright, that's about it! That's about it! Beer, do we care about the hypocrisy, There there's just a whole bunch of stuff- that's ok, just because, historically with we have allowed that in politics the hypocrisy of the live hyperbole, the dirty tricks, thee.

scheming the fake news, that's ok, your worries to them, but just make sure you know the lightness you're, an insurrection I give you an insurrection. Yeah see that headline raven cartoonists calls for civil war. Well, owing to avoid a civil wars, when I'm calling. I'm saying that you know. A slippery slope thing I keep talking about where I'm usually debunking it, but then changing my mind halfway through democratic and push. Now. Let me ask you this: Do you have the same feeling I do that it feels like feels. I Democrats or people

who complain about everything, no matter how small republicans or people who are ok until they're, not ok. That could be just I'm reading my own personality into some something's. It feels like they're right in here, the blind spot, the blind spot would be. If democrats are look here, republic and are now seeing as much complain? I guess they would expect cause if cause. If the Democrats were in that position, you'd see lots of complaining. The lack of complaining from the republicans should not make you feel comfortable. You feel me right. The lack of complaining from republicans about the way they're being treated.

Should not be taken as comfort, because republicans are okay with things until they're, not democrats who just mad overtime, that everything is that the way they get resources by this by complaining. How do I how do men get resources in the traditional? Let's say that the sexes world they go work right again, I have they go work. How do women get resources in our sexist world? Again lots of exceptions, blah blah blah blah blah at a women. Get resources by making men feel bad. Complaining. I'm sorry, that's how it works. You know that they'll give it a cellist. Does you adds to it asked now? If I said that's true of every woman, I believe if I said that, of every man, maybe lie.

I said the world were only men and women. Well, I think that that that that also is too simplistic. Does you ve got us if gender ambiguity, some people's, you, wives, boss of the families plenty play of exceptions, but when I say that the democratic party you sort of e the woman party complaining is operating system that, if you complain enough, he will get you get some stuff, The republicans are more like: if we have a good system will get better stuff see. The difference is a complete based operating system, vs, a a let's say, a system or machine based thing like. If you make the machine work, we all get good stuff. So, let's work on the machine and the the Democrats are more like. If I complain enough, I can

tell me your stuff, so one of them is based on an abundance mindset, I'll, go work or create a system that makes more for everybody. and the other is based on these shortages mindset that got some stuff, I don't have some stuff. I need to get your stuff from you and it goes to me a transfer now. Is there a difference between men and women in hunting, verses gathering, I'm way out of my depth, their son? speculative. Is it true that historically, the amended the hunting and women in the gathering, the hunting as you go out and make something happen, and the gathering is you find the things you find it is decided,

I think, I think that the Democrats being sort woman dominated party are all about. Well, we don't have to make things. We just need to find them and I found it to be your pocket as how some money it's over there in elon musk's pocket, well Solved, I need some money there's money in the alone, mosques pocket so was put those together and problem solved right, there's where there is a very big philosophical difference between hunting and killing upside between hunting and finding very big, and I feel like that, the republicans or hunters and the democratic finders their gathers now again huge number of individual differences. You like, I can only say that republicans and get away with it.

I could say well, there's a general thing going on here, but you are I understand there's tons and tons of individual exceptions and then you and the republicans all go well. That's true! Yeah yeah you're talking about a general thing, but of course there are plenty of exceptions. What did the Democrats do when you say that you are racist you're not gonna, use you sexist then, and I am saying this plenty of exceptions and we we respect all the exceptions. Equally, all you big it? I'm really just talking about a general savior, I'm not talk about any individual. You dishonest So that's the way it works on the left on the right. You you can handle the fact that individuals can be different than the average. Apparently that's a concept that is not universally understood.

The somebody says that, as a very funny female joke that is extremely sexist and you can say it or why did you announce it? No announce a joke. You're not going to tell us. Let me introduce you to the the humor rule. The humor rule goes like this. You can tell me, there's a joke, you can't tell me you can either not mention it or you can. I'll be the joke, those are the rules I didn't make them up. I didn't make them. I would not encourage you to say that joke the youtube. If this were the locals platform, they could tell their joke. Do you know why? Because people on the locals platform would know it's a joke, that's the difference and they say. Okay, that's insulting!.

It pretty funny are the locals people insult me all the time, but if it's funny as five this funny. You're saying gathering in hunting or both harvesting, I feel a difference. I see what you say: you're using a word to change the argument. Don't use words to change my argument. You know what I'm talkin. Alright, I haven't seen any big called forty fires. Somebody was asking me: it is possible. The California's figured out how to stop the big fires because they now have that emergency helicopter brigade that gets on stuff quickly. It works at night. Now they can operate at night as well as use seventy on fire

Hmm, ok! Well, it's not it's not nearly as bad as it used to be. Our air quality is actually good where I am alright. Well, I hope they get that you're. Seventy fire under control. I do I'll catch up on the seventy fire haven't seen anything about. Yeah. We get smoke from the somebody's fire as we really alright. So I guess I didn't know about that. Somebody fire I'll, take a look at that. There's an oakland fire. the california clear the underbrush. You know, I didn't hear anything about that.

But I also don't know Israel you use for underbrush. Is there any way you can monetize underbrush? Can you collect enough of it to turn it into anything? Can you turn into something a biofuel? You could do a biomass thing right, mulch fertilizer! Does it work as for the underbrush makes the soil of the forest yeah well yeah. I guess they do need soil, but they always need more if you have enough for a tree or the oak fires out alright. What about the

I think, that's all we ve got for today and I believe that we have done their job. Is this the best life's dream you ve ever seen my mistaken or or does it look exactly like? It is Let me ask you something so good a hers. Let me ask you something: do you think we make difference like selectively, so I would have no impact anything if I didn't have an audience

and so the audience. Basically you know imbues me with whatever energy I have, and I think we do. I think we do because I think we're we're approaching the point where, if, if you- and I collectively all of you plural, if you and I collectively saw something- was a terrible, terrible idea, I feel like It- would be harder for a government to do it. Just because you know our opinions do have enough of a reach that it would be arising to do something that was just a bad idea, as had been clearly described as a bad idea. So clarity is one of the things I feel like we can add to them system. What do you think Maybe that's the only thing, maybe the anything? I had the system is clarity in context, because that's all I'm trying to do.

I'm trying to only add clarity in context. If I add clarity in context, you should come to the same conclusion as me:. So I'm not trying to necessarily change your mind with argument. make sure that you see the same things I see Once you see them, I am confident that you will end up with the same opinion, so I dont need to directly change your opinion. Other change. What things you ve been exposed to emission did the same thing should be not every time, but it should be in the long run. scott when you do your own show on fox, if offered no, no, I wouldn't. Since jugglers assumes you get a boss, you're useless you'll get them the moment. I have a boss, a mortals gazelle, just the boss,

The only thing you know your hearing is what the boss allowed me to say: do you think there's anything I said today that a boss would have, let me say just think about today show think about the live stream. You just watched. How much of that do you think I could have put on a network show cable shall almost none of it, and I certainly couldn't do the the level of emotion. I would have a set time limit. and I guarantee you that I would have conversations about defending my sponsors. Well, first of all, who would sponsor this? I would probably already have sponsor offers, even with the size of than what is. I would already have a sponsor offers. If this were not absolute, poisons sponsors

one of the things that I can offer you is that I will continue to be poisoned to sponsors. I'm not trying to do that. But apparently, if you're honest, you can't get sponsored cause, the sponsors need you to be. You know just generic and family friendly and stay stay on the political right side of things. So I'm not trying to do that. He d products all right, yeah, it's hard to speculate under major brands right. So I do a lot of stuff. That's pure speculation, and I later but I don't have a date for the Russell brand conversation. Yet if I, if I had sponsors they would influence me, I think they would

So, as you know, I do a comic strip for newspapers. Do you think that I can do in the newspaper and online? I mean probably more people see it online, but do you think I could do? I could do a dilbert comic and that's exactly the comic I would want to write and that the the people who are my clients would be okay with that. The answer is no, no, they would not be okay with. I honest opinions ass lady. They need something that family friendly, so you may notice pushing them. Boundaries. In the past several months, I'm kind of making all of my editors and my clients uncomfortable with the content, because I'm going after of the woke stuff that several years some of the pit myself, add their our papers that are not running me so that my comic about you, the character dave. I think there are some newspapers it didn't run. This is too dangerous one. So

I do keep my content within the realm that I know the clients will allow even on pushing the edge which, by the way, that's what they pay for it The client buys you as a cartoonist, especially my kind, a cartoon they're, paying you to push the boundary, but not too right they they need to be a little bit edgy. This parliament, as part of the entertainment, so see gilbert getting a lot edgier in the coming year. I suppose and breaking news now in a small way. So so dilber is going to get cancelled. Let's say by design because as I'm approaching my retirement planning years don't want to go out with a whimper. I don't. I wanna go out in flames

and if I have to sell something on flame that needs to be set on flame and by the way productively. I'm not talking about anarchy, I'm talking about setting on fire or something that may be needed to be set on fire, but yeah dilbert is going to get edgier and edgier until they won't. Let me do it anymore, so By that that will be my version of retiring, and then you know what I'm gonna do. I guess a break in the news here for the first time: So this is a preliminary plan, but its national plan I'm going to be cancelled by everybody in the regular client business and then I'll move my content to a subscription service. well, the locals. So there is a good chance that say five years from now that the only place you would ever see a dilbert comic is on a subscription service. But then I can say anything I want and you haven't seen that

you bet you haven't, see light yet so, but I'm not gonna do. at unless I get canceled and I'm going to try as hard as I can to fly as close to the sun as I can and by the way I never do anything just to offend some people think I might but I'd never do content this meant for entertainment or maybe to provoke, but I don't do it just to piss people off there's a reason for it. Alright, that's all for now and I'm going to go, do something else. So are you I'll talk to you later.