Good morning everybody and welcome to another amazing episode of coffee with Scott Adams. The best thing that's ever happened to you in your whole life it when my nose is running on a suit. Soon, as I get live, it's like psychological well, but enough about me more about you. What could we do to make your day? it's amazing? Well, I've got an idea that begins with a cup or mug or a glass or tanker. Jealous aside, I can't change others Alaska vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, like coffee and join me now, for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day. The thing that makes everything better is called simultaneous it hold on hold. On I'm getting a note from Democrats, it's no longer called the simultaneous,

the redefining it quick before they redefined it? Do it think we got it under the wire. well here's some big news, joy, behar of the view, You might know her as no friend of Republicans, I don't know if you've heard, but she's, not a big fan of president trump. Have you And even she said of the january six hearings that there's no way trump is going to be prosecuted because they found nothing even joy, behar. said out loud in public that, if all they have is the word find that word means something else. Joy frickin bay are. Just got out of the bubble. Did you

She was going to escape the bubble. First, like I somehow imagined the bubble that the left is in. This should be the last one out she got out of the bubble, not enough and stay out, but she literally could see the january sixth thing for what it actually is, and I can't think of one other prominent trump supporter who's done that yet is there any other example? Is there any

well known pundit, who is anti trump who's, looked at it and said yeah, I'm still anti trump, but I gotta admit: there's nothing there in that january, six stuff. Anyway, to me, that was big news. Here's more big news! I've I've told you before that the biggest market in the future will be building cities from scratch, because we're so much better at knowing what it is that somebody would need in the modern world tried to retrofit our old buildings for the modern lifestyle doesn't make sense. We have so much better ways to be user, o energy and everything else, and so the saudis- I don't know about this. There. They started a like a half. Billion dollars, Marty city, and they have all these

the ground layers of services and transportation, so above the above those layers, will be the homes itself. They have. Everything from the the the city would be designed so that everybody can walk to everything they need. nothing would be outside walking distance. She would never really need a car except to leave the city, s pose Suppose. Museum energy in those parts, part of their thing would be a floating city. This is often the year just offshore, so I figured out how to make a floating silly. You have connected land still says not floating well, but they ve, apparently designed a floating city. They think They can make that work now think about that the saturdays Building a zero energy city either the saudis can see the future

This is why I had hoped. Amerika would be first step, but you know it's it's hard to accept that america is not the sort of that the leader in doing cool, futuristic things any more it used to be. It was just ass, though you remember that I felt like it was a kind of futurists. thing being built and all it was always america, another sort. This out, he seemed to be aware of everybody. Building this feature is the city but what goes lives. I realize yesterday that you'll musk has shown slowly assembled a three d printer to make entire cities. Do you believe that the EU law mosque has assembled the assets to create a three d printer to just print?

a city, here's what I mean. So here's what he refs he's got this boring company. You know these gigantic devices that bored tunnels, and so you can, if you wanted to build something like this saudi futuristic, smart city, you need a lot of underground facilities, so he's got that so he's got the or incomplete to build the tunnels. You do now some time ago that they figured out how to make a brick maker so that the dirt from the tunnels can be pressed into bricks on site, say eternity Norton directs, he has also announced that he's building robots tesla will have a robot, and also whose work is doing, is deeply invested in ai, both through tesla and other investments.

and then, of course, he's got the solar panel stuff? You know the solar wall for your home to have a zero energy home so think about it. Imagine this boring thing you're going through and making underground tunnels the bricks the dirt is being turned into bricks, on site. The robots are taking the bricks of the assembly them according to an ai I and and their to the best design homes. So you don't have to worry about. The home is poorly designed because it's the best design ever the ai just found the best design ever. does a little hole and there s a little home is built the robot slaps on some solar panels. It makes it zero energy and you basically, you could basically just really print a town without you This involved you're very close. You can have the whole city being built by robots without any

big even being on on site once you just release them to do with things. I well? What else is new and wonderful? There's a start up these ghosts called a wonder and they have food delivery trucks, but here's the wrinkle they finished cookie. The food in the truck at your curb. So what what's the worst thing about pick up food they just like a little soggy by the time it gets to you, there's a lot of food that doesn't travel. But you don't also want to go there to the restaurant. It's got its own problems so now the,

There's a high end truck it's like a little kitchen in it and the food I think is, is prep, so it's almost cooked, so they they just finish it when they get there, which is easier so that they don't have to be chefs they're just finishing it. Apparently people like it, but the green people are complaining because it's a diesel truck so apparently a big diesel truck parks in front of your suburban home for two hours or whatever it takes maybe an hour and is basically a food truck. But it's high end, so you're getting high end steak. seven sushi and stuff that you would normally associate with a food truck. Apparently, as your scott, like billions of dollars of funding, now here's my

when with our food delivery and I'll and I'll, give you an anecdote from my local safeway. Alright, so I happen to live in the town. By coincidence, that is the headquarters for the safeway grocery store brand, so the safeways in my town tend to be the ones that try things first, because that's where the ceo lives Basically they can check it out easier because it's right in town, so one of the things my town has is these special new age shopping carts? Where you can scan your you can scan your product as it's going into the cart. The cart weighs it and it's got some other technology, even as a camera, so it can tell if you put something in the car that didn't scan properly it'll cost

Whatever so, is this great now, when you hear that you can, you can have all of your stuff paid for without standing in line. Aren't you happy about that as great? Isn't it well, there was one little wrinkle with the process. They don't let you take these fancy cards in the parking lot. What that's right once you've done your shopping! You have to unload your car into a standard shopping. Cart. Every item now keep in mind that the items in your first shopping cart bags stuffy took right off the shelf, so one item of time you reach into this fucking high tech, cart and put it into the low tech carp. Why you're swearing was Fucking piece of technology is making me, god, piece of shit? Why did I waste my god fucking time doing this? If you're going to make me just

every little fucking piece of dick deck and I drop and fucking vegetable one out of fucking time for this one to this one by the time you're done you want to rip the store apart for putting you through it. It's like appointed. This thing was to save me time and I even believe how hard it is now you might even say to yourself it'll still save time. You know does not that hard to move it and no because the technology almost never works almost every time you ve gotta, call in the system and wait for them and the poor the things and work it out. So the technology is completely broken. Here's what's wrong with food. There are one hundred fucking people who have to touch it, including you, fifteen times just to get it in your mouth. You know you drive to the store, you put it in your car, you take it out of the car, you put it on the checker thing,

check your poison in the cart car into the fucking car car into the fucking counter and the kitchen counter into the fucking refrigerator refrigerator Then that's like half way through the process. Thus, like half way, you still got a cook. The ship and throw away and everything. So one of the things that I think the pandemic did for us is the sort of Made us all deal with how bad our food delivery system is is very efficient. We we've got to get the production of the food right down close to your table so that and and prepared to more easily let the robots prepare it grow. The gardens locally, there's probably some way to solve this, though, delivery thing is just completely inefficient, but maybe this wonder truculently part of a solution in my perfect world there would be trucks, hovering nearby, and I would

my app and I see where the trucks are And I see oh there's a truck that has good steaks over here, and this truck has some sushi and I'd say: oh well, I'm not that hungry. So my favorite truck is pretty far away, but I don't mind cause you know, I'm not that hungry. So it feels like my perfect world is to have the food ready to go on a truck, but not never too far from my neighborhood. You know within twenty minutes that sort of thing. maybe that's where it so well. Let's, let's put this all, could we Let me summarize- set the saturdays building, building a half trillion dollar smart cities, pretty impressive, pretty impressive

you've got got musk on assembled coups assembled somebody assets doing other things that if he wanted, he could put them together and three deeper print, a city which is kind of cool And then this wonder startup might be redefining food. Those are big. Big things really really changes the nature of civilization. Let's see what the Democrats are doing The salary is mosque in these startups change. Civilization itself and the most basic and important ways. I check in with the Democrats will see the headline see what they've done to us today. Well, they range, reengineer, some common words. They also solve big problems. For example, I used to be worried about a recession, but they tell us that the definition of a recession

has now miraculously changed from what they specifically told us in two thousand and eight said people. Actually, this guy named Brian. two thousand and eighty told us congress have a technical definition of recession, which is two consecutive quarters of negative growth which we've had And that yesterday he is updated. Its definition of recession too. Two negative quarters of gdp growth is not the technical definition of recession What kind of material things that come on? So they save this from recession by redefining work but I'm still worried about inflation. Aren't you at least we dodged the recession by redefining the word, but what about? inflation. Well, don't worry, don't worry. Democrats have you covered yeah they have decided to james the definition of inflation, so that one's going away

Now, that's not! These are not the only victories they've had They redefined a vaccination from something that protects you to something that maybe makes you not so sick. they redefined. The word find to be stealing lie. recession. Of course, as new definition, insurrection. Insurrection used to be in trying to take over the government, usually an armed situation, and now it's just complaining, as is complaining, they redefined. I just found this one out today that Was a planned parenthood, redefined pregnancy, you would think that can get redefined but I been a distinction between ectopic, pregnancy and those things which are real pregnancies, I guess by their definition, so that they could still have what you

I call it an abortion, but they wouldn't call it that, because that's not really a pregnancy, it's just some kind of an ectopic thing, so they've defined redefine that way. Fascism used to be one thing, but now means that a whole different thing did you use to know what a woman was used to know what a woman was now not so sure, not so sure why supremacy means, obviously anything you wanted to mean green. It used to be no nuclear which didn't make sense, but now it does include nuclear, so they redefined what green means because they needed it. To solve the problem as soon as they needed green to solve a problem, they changed the definition of it. Do you notice? any theme or pattern here. the entrepreneurs, and indeed other countries, are doing gigantic

used to re civilization and all of its systems. The Democrats, are telling us that we're using words wrong, but their fixing it by changing the definitions and making all of our big problems go was so good for them. And so now that they've made all of these terms mean something different than what you thought. I just published a robust, read news. Comic you'll, see that today and I just have one warning now that we know all of these words that you used to know what they mean being something else. The word most worried about now is sustainable. seems, like all the words started, meaning the opposite of what they meant the work working really hard to make the world sustainable

It was a time when I thought that meant you know: you'd all get to stay alive and things would be fairly good, but if they redefined that it might mean to murder us all could becoming well. This was surprise you quite a bit trust in the media has gone to an all time low. I wonder what happened was there something that happened to the media that caused their credibility that just started. It is our job job, actually, roy the media, because the media would after job- and I think what he said as well- Might take me down, but you go with me. What's trumps popularity, though I think it is low forties.

Well, the media's popularity is a public. Trust is down to seven percent. No seven percent is for congress, it's just less tv news, yet only the democratic, controlled congress is less trusted than the news business, which is down to eleven per cent trust. The news. a newspapers, sixteen percent also near the bottom, so tv news and newspapers are basically completely mistrusted at this point in time. I wonder what caused that. And maybe I would suggest that we need a truce, the naming law for legislation, because if you can create legislation that increases inflation and you can name at the inflation reduction act so that more honestly, through voting for the wrong thing. I feel like you need some kind of law that says that the bill should say something

What is in their or asian ever generic name? Can you get imagined forcing anguish to properly name their own bills it never approved. That was a cause. They know that the only way that they can make stuff work is to fool. You into thinking are something else. You don't believe that you don't think that the government is intentionally fooled. You so that you'll that they can get stuff approved well There's this big this, this big spending bill, which isn't fully approved the senator sos to prove it, but if it gets approved, it's called the inflation reduction act of two thousand twenty two, and would you like to know isn't in it cause it's it's like really big spending bill. So, if you don't mind, I'd like to tell you what's in it now,

keep bear with me. It's like a really big spending bill, tons of complexity, but I feel like I can. I can do this and keep your interest. So I want to see an end to find out. What are the details of this bill is number one headline. so it's just the biggest headline in the country? Is this bill there's going to be a lot of reporting on? What's in it, to look for. What's in, it and apparently the congress has released a one page description. What what I thought I read that wrong. No, I'm sorry! It's not a one page description, Oh one page description would be like crazy for, like a gigantic you trillion dollar bill

like it's actually a one page fact sheet: it's a one page factsheet, I'm not making this up, I'm not making this up. Congress hasn't told us was the bill or anybody else CNN doesn't know. What's in the bill, I'm not making that up. Did you know that is the headline. There is no document that tells us was the bill. Such a one page faction, but I guess I guess medicare would be allowed to negotiate prices. I like that were ass good yeah, let's say what else it would, Money three hundred and sixty nine billion into energy and climate change programs, where the goal

Reducing carbon emissions by forty percent by two thousand and thirty okay, but I feel like that fact sheet. Let me just mention that, and see what you think so see you then reports there's a one page of fact sheet. Just one page, wouldn't you think I don't know this is just me, but if congress produced a one page fact sheet. First of all, there's no copyright problem, alright, if the government, if the government publishes something we all own it so there's no copyright. What would be the reason for cnn not to publish the one page fact sheet, you think what why would the news not publish one page of a have you seen it.

exists. They told us that exists. You telling me that a one page factions just to the image so that we can see what they saw instead of relying on them to interpret the one page really. Really I shall be one page, somebody says they don't have it even worse. You know.

Cnn get a one page fact sheet from somebody in congress there there's nobody in congress doesn't give seeing him the one page faction. Really really. How can you conclude anything except your government and the news business and the news business? Don't want you to know. What's in it? How could you conclude anything else, because the the bar of difficulty for showing you what's in it at least the fact sheet- is zero? Zero there's, no friction at all. How hard is it for a news business to include an image on their webpage

z ro, it's just what they do every day. There's no extra! This is the news. Here's the picture here. It is pasted how in the world, could you explain it any other way than both the government and the news business? This is important or colluding to not tell you what the government is doing and they're doing it right in front of you right in front of you. there's. No ambiguity about this whatsoever. We're not we're you tell in the spending bill every one of these mother fucker should be fired all of them? Everybody in the news business who didn't report this. The way I just did should be fired if the news, businesses and you say well, congress won't tell us the details. So we're not even the report, this motherfucker I'd say: ok, that's, okay, But if the news business collude with the government to not tell you wasn't a bill, they all need to be fired

yeah, the media, the government and that's, that is a low behavior, that's so far beyond, and you dont most people think How many of you thought somebody must have seen the bill, although you thought that right until I told you that nobody has seen it didn't you think more. Somebody see that they voted on it. Somebody seen it now. I don't think the people voted on Assad deal. Do you assume the bill is ginormous thing with many pages is really boring. And if you look tat he might not even know what you are looking at. If you are slipping through it and you saw some expenses, would you know this expense? For this line item is too much or too little

philly. So I think that even the news as F we looked at it, we wouldn't know what we're saying. So it is probably a document. This bias design is made for you not to be able to penetrate it. That's a real thing I used to prevent. I used to prevent freudian slip used to be my job to present information to management. Do you think I ever presented it in a way that was designed to hide the truth, while when I was asked to yup, sometimes yell, you had the truth, it'll be some truth. You didn't think was useful, but that was your opinion, so you'd, basically be managed your superiors by hiding from them any truth that might be a problem to you. So managers don't really manage. I dunno if I'm the first one to tell you this managers don't manage because they have to rely on their underlings to tell them. What

true? So the underlines the underlings decide what's true and that defines what a leader could even make a decision on so really yeah yeah. Really it's the whole system. remember remember I told you was in a week or two ago that I thought inflation had peaked and maybe you didn't believe me:

wall. Street journal is reporting, at least in an opinion piece with lots of data to back it up that inflation is probably peak, so do do I get an attaboy for that. We don't know if it's true yet just the wall street journal, but I did say it before the wall street journal and the wall street journal gave us a backup. Thank you. Thank you. I got. I got a boy there, that's all I wanted, so I do think inflation peaked. I think we're going to be okay, I think the recession. By the way, let me say Publicly, if trump had told you that suddenly two periods of negative gdp growth no longer meant recession, because this is a special case. I actually would have supported that, because the economy is, is a psychology

and I ve often said that the the role of a leader is to be more optimistic than the facts, allow to be more optimistic about the economy than the facts actually suggest. You should be not crazy optimistic, but you should be above the actual anti, because that's what gets people filling positive about the economy and then it's a self fulfilling So in this case, I'm going to agree with the binding ministration. They call is this recession, though I do think they have to answer for the fact that they had a different desk definition than they did in two thousand. They do. We all agree with that. They have to answer to the fact that they changed the definition, but they have a reason.

They have a reason, and the reason was here's how I would have done so so the body nutrition spokespeople have completely botched this. Let let me be the spokesperson for Biden for a minute and I'll take the hard question that they couldn't answer, scott you work for the binding nutrition hypothetically. and why did you used to say that the definition of recession was two consecutive quarters of gdp? You said that publicly and specifically but now you say it's more of a holistic situation. How do you explain that easily? If you're, not a fucking idiot, you could do it. right. How hard would it be Explain that away. You'd have to be an idiot not to

able to handle that easy question. Let me do it for you. What's the name of the spokesperson, something gene never remember names like it's three, three word name, let's suppress secretaries. Do not fang fang stop at or at corinne jean Pierre, that's a hard name to remember. Isn't it corinne jean cringey? Does you remember that? Stu rhyme is easier, green, jean Pierre, so here me doing her job. Why did you change the definition of recession and well the there's sort of a rule of thumb, definition, the two consecutive periods of gdp- and I would say therefore, broadly ninety eight percent of every case that simple rule pretty much is accurate, but there is a special case

Where they economists would say, and largely both of them will agree with us that there is a special case, and the special case would be when things get temporarily knocked gonna whack, but for some reason you know that it's temporary that's what the pandemic did. the pandemic temporarily whacked us in a way that we know is recoverable because we know what did it. We know how to get back. this isn't like a regular, a regular business as usual recession, if this were business as usual, then probably the two periods of gdp would would capture everything you needed to capture because there wouldn't be any other variables, but when the, coming out of the pandemic. Everything's upside down so for awhile are standard definitions. Probably won't work

if that was a good rule of thumb and will probably go back to it. After after we have chewed up, you know the trouble from the pandemic. We get back to some kind of a baseline. If you ask me again in five years to define a recession, I'd probably go back to the two you just say, to gene to periods of gdp, because once the baseline us is stable, then you could just say that rule of thumb starts working it. But at the moment there is a special case. It doesn't work and I think you're, all adult enough, to understand that even a simple rule of thumb would have exceptions were all adult enough to understand that aren't we there should be exceptions to the rule of thumb. Now: Tell me in the comments: did I not mail that I know

I absolutely positively slate it now? Let me ask you this: how fucking hard was that not it wasn't hard when you watched the best that the Biden administration can give you for a spokesperson. The best you can do for spokesperson is to act like you, don't know how to answer that question. That's really bad work like that is really bad work. I don't think we can overlook that. The spokesperson from the president is barely In my opinion, these are not hard questions to answer they're, really, not they really. What about when they say. Why are you calling this gigantic bill? The inflation reduction act when you're spending a bunch of money. And the other will be like blah blah blah blah blah here's how I'd answer well, what matters

what matters to people is how much they're spending unless they're going to call some of that inflation and some of its other problems supply chain. Everything else. but what matters is what you pay. So what this bill does? Is this going to lower your health care costs, which are a big part of your spending? Now, that's not that's not an answer to inflation in general, but I think you'll feel that your pockets. So while we can't solve inflation in general right away, we do have to work through this excess. Your money, listen There are a few things that we can do and I like you to know that, just because we can't do everything doesn't mean we're not going to do the things we can do so well, that the title of the inflation reduction act That's a little left say aspirational.

Bill does have very specific things that we're sure you would agree will lower your costs in some big areas, we're going to work on the rest, because inflation is not something you solve with one spending bill. I think you'd all agree with that, but because it's so important that we get some of your key cost of say fifty at impair and I'm maybe something else when there but you're right. There's a lot more work to do. How hard would that be? How hard would it be to explain yeah the the title is a little aspirational. You know this won't solve all of inflation, but we're going to pick some key things and then we think we can take a bite out of a few key things and that will help you out. How hard is that hard right when, when you see how bad or how badly

the the representatives of our explaining the democrat stuff? It's it's just heartbreaking that they can't even explain their own position is the gravel here's, a question that you haven't ask yourself: I keep seeing a bunch of people complain that trust should have done more on january six and specifically one of the they say he should have done more of- is to try to get a bigger military presence in the capital now there are some. There's some grey area about whose job it is to do what and who asked for one at a time and who refused it there's mayor, bowser and there's nancy pelosi, and they they both have some something to do with. Who can you what kind of military or presence or how much security there's so there's a whole bunch of people involved,

But let me ask you just as one question imagine if you could imagine if you could that president trump thought there might be apple and so big of a good president. Just the way the Democrats suggest he should have been. He had requested and let's say he got approval for cause. Some of you are going to say he did ask for it, but he didn't get approval which, by the way, has been debunked. The. I don't know which is true, the debunk or the claim, but I saw what I thought was a credible debunk. The setting never asked for it and only talked about it. So I do know the utter true there, but just be aware, if you think is a fact that the s for it and was denied that the news is reporting the opposite and there's a sixteen percent chance that the news is right so put that in here,

Put that in your considerations, alright, but here's the only question that I'm going to get to imagine if you will that trump had asked for, let's say national guard and and it had been approved player, you have trump asked for a large military presence and it gets approved and they show up played you as I that go good because eight they eliminate the violence right. No, that's fascism, that's fascism! If an actual military force there, the Democrats would sit, would say what they say. Go Democrats say hitler pillar. Is

color is a coup, it's a military coup and that all of the then all of the reporting would be about how the head of that particular unit was pro trump. I dunno if that would be the case, but imagine if that were the case, you'd say: wait, a minute Trump called a military unit with the head of the military voted for trump. Well, that's a coup. If ever saw. Did sir action? That's an insurrection. Do you I understand there was nothing he could do and am I the first person to tell you that there was nothing he could do if he had if he had actually gotten a bigger military force. That totally would have

against the. If you say to me by scott, you would have stopped the violence, I wouldn't do it. If he says scott, you would have prevented the deaths of, let's say ashley babbitt and you may maybe people who committed suicide because they had the accuse. I do so you can. You could attribute injuries and death to the event, but suppose you said to me: I can make all of that go away. All you have to do is: have the military show up nope nope? I will not take that deal. I will not take that deal. I will not let the military if I have a choice. I don't want the military of my capital I'd rather, the citizens fight it out and the of some of them go to jail. They gonna jail like that. This was people the people as soon as you get the military, and there is all wrong. Yes, Kent state,

everything as soon as the military? There is a different situation and it never changes. so it would have forever been painted, as republicans are clearly the fascist we believe they are. clearly they had planned a military takeover. Well, it didn't work, that's what they would report, trumpet pride and military takeover, but luckily, luckily for us that military was loyal and they didn't follow his orders, what orders and then you'd find out there were never any orders to conquer the capital but they reported that there were everything would have been way worse if the military been there than the military been national guard. Have I made my case and by the way, Has anybody asked that question if trump had done what people

said they wanted him to do. Would they be happy with that? Would they be happy with that? No, not even a chance well. People are say again on twitter that people are dying, they think from the vaccination complications, and so often they are there's a whole. Once again, that's trending and people are showing anecdotes of individual people who seem to have died relatively soon after a vaccination shot. Let's call them shots, so you don't bug me for calling them vaccinations so I don't know, if anecdote, I don't know of anecdotal reports, are telling us anything or not the way they should use as it is as flags not as proof would you agree that the anecdotal reports

you should only go as far as making a assail? Maybe we should look at the data were carefully or something, but they shouldn't be prove, no matter how many you say, because you could easily be fooled by anecdotes. That is why what did we invent so that you wouldn't be fooled by anecdotes? What is civilization, aid to prevent us beef to be fooled by our own eyes, so easily science, science So unless sciences and again science could be wrong too but unless science has a little work on this year, anecdotes are not worth anything but I ever be able to convince you of that. No no, there isn t sciences that our brains are not capable of dismissing anecdotes. We can do it as much as you ought to be smart and say. Alright, I'm going to be think scientifically I know that this one anecdote of my neighbor dropping dead, ten minutes after giving, Vaccination doesn't

Oh you mean anything. but it really seems like it means someplace. You can't really get past it. Anecdotes are absolutely convincing. So what do you do? Well, I've suggested a solution. You could call it a vaccination to your anecdote, it's more of a therapeutic because you you're already infected. So let's call it a therapeutic tool, anecdotes, and it goes like this- I'm going to meet your anecdote with a better anecdote. I didn't see that coming I'm, I'm going to see her anecdote end up at one end, don't it goes like this. How many famous people are there in the world? Let's just say the united states? How many famous people would you recognize their names? If I made a list of all the famous people, it'd be pretty long right, probably one thousand.

probably one thousand names you would actually recognize. Oh yeah, justin bieber. You probably get three hundred musical artists right, there's probably at least three hundred musicians and bands and stuff that you could recognize many. Then you throw in the politicians the celebrities of the law. maybe a thousand so of this house celebrities how many of them died from covered.

And how many of them died from the vaccination complications, because a thousands quite a bit. It's like an anecdote, that's better than your anecdote about your neighbor, your neighbors, just one person. Maybe you know about four, there's an anecdote today about four doctors who died in some hospital. Allegedly, I don't believe it, but that's that's the story. Basically, I don't believe that the story is true that four doctors died unexpectedly and if they did is probably something else, but you know like fentanyl, I'm not accusing just say doctors I have access to the good stuff. All it would take is one bad batch of fentanyl, but I'm just saying that

It could be other reasons that doctors die suddenly. Now how but there's my question: how many celebrities, like an actual famous person, died during the pandemic? I believe the answer is zero. Am I wrong that died because of covert now hank Aaron Hank Aaron died. The hack Aaron was how old, but let's say you take people under under seventy five, how many famous people under seventy five died of coven? How old is below at close to seventy five. Wasn't alright. So that's how many people died of covert, who are famous and I'm seeing a lot actually more suggestions overall

It goes so they're saying Herman Cain, hank aaron Joe Diffie. I guess people have heard of him so meatloaf. He already said John Prine. He sounds relatively famous or as Marvin Hagler. The marvin Hagler, so that's a several people who died of covert, allegedly, allegedly how many people are confirmed to have died.