I think everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization is called the coffee with Scott Adams. It's the best thing. That's ever happened to you in your whole, damn life and I got my phone just stopped working. What is going to happen, holy cow, really, my phone just blew up. To play something for you in a minute, but I get it fired up here. we'll be glad I did boy. Will you be happy happiest day life here? It comes here it Ladies and gentlemen, today. will be one of the best days of your entire life, because you're here with us and if you'd like to take up a notch- and I think you do

All you need is a copper or lesson. It is also time that kinda jogger flask of vessels of any kind fully with your fate. Liquid? I like coffee and join you now for the internal little pleasure, stop vineyard. things- makes everything better. The simultaneous kalash now go see that makes my technology on work better. Now, So I want to play for you a dramatic reading by jack Pacific. mark Emily's resignation, letter of it? Did you read? Martin lilies resignation learn. So apparently, road rail resignation letter when he wasn't in the drop administration

He did not delivered so he didn't resign, but we of access the letter? It is this. obviously because The first thing we learned disease, a terrible writer. It doesn't look like a good general frankly, but is a terrible writer, but jack besotted takes it to the next level, and he does. He did a dramatic reading of mark Millar's resignation, letter just gonna play for you, just just a small clip from that, I believe you have made a concerted effort over time to politicized united states military. I thought that I could change The realisation that I could not be just a beside the someone else tripe and I'm dead sea sick sack, I'm reading it verbatim Mr President, you are using the military to create fear in the lives of people and we are trying to protect the american people. I'd have abstained idly by and participate

the or otherwise of the american people, people trust military. We cannot turn back. Agencies I will play the whole thing, like You have to go, see it you can see it in the jackboots arvixe twitter feed or I re tweeted it this morning, couldn't find it at the top of my feed. That's really funny. I wish I'd thought of doing that cause cause work perfectly. Let's talk about the good news before we get to the f b. I read stuff, of course, we'll be talking about that. Of course we will, I've mentioned this before, but I think this is going to be the biggest deal in the world like actually the biggest The biggest thing this can happen in the world over the next fifty years. Because building citys from scratch low,

because our existing cities legacy and the steward is to change them into something better there, all car, centric and polluted But saudi arabia is building a. This many miles long city is like an enclosed structure. They will go for miles and miles and like a straight line, and each little square within it would be a living place where everybody could walk to get everything in it. So there'll be no cars, no pollution, probably no crime. I guess it'll be less of a security, camera since that probably no crime and everything will be convenient and clean, now sceptic save, never build this thing, but apparently the orient approval as one of cities ma

cities that are being designed around the world, so in ten different places, people are trying to build a city from scratch. Where you do I think right now, one of the things that I think they're doing the the saudi version is that the parts to build it will be designed in the factory so that you don't have to cut it when it gets there. I think that's what they're saying I'm reading between the lines, but to be thus the biggest deal, the biggest deal is, if you could make one little part of many miles, long city, if you can make one little part of that work perfectly you just reproducing. So I think the economics- and this would be terrific lindsey maybe one of the ten will get it right. or Rasmussen s the american public, what they thought about real. During the military draft military draft.

I'm gonna tell my audience because I know that you're smarter than the average audits. So most of you have now seen the results of the service. I want to see how close you can get together. what percentage of the american adults think there will be a good idea to reintroduce the military draft? Oh my god, how do you do it? How do you do it you're? So close? twenty three percent employees representatives nearly ass, nearly a quarter. which sometimes is expressed as twenty five percent. If your new to my life's rooms, you may be impressed at this feat of mental acuity. You should stay around. everybody who watches my live streaming long enough, could have gotten tat s all right without

owing anything about the survey itself. Every one of you could have gotten that answer right, yeah. So the newcomers stick around. That's the sort of thing you're gonna learn alright. The funniest we I've ever tweeted was completely ignored, so I'm gonna, I'm gonna tell you about it, because I dont, like my best work, to be ignored. Now I'm gonna ask you who, after I'd, have to explain it. You tell me this isn't my best work, but maybe maybe it was too subtle. So there was a tweet by Randy Weingarten. You might know her as the head of the biggest teachers unions where she tweeted. She said teachers shortage was bad before this year, but has been made worse by what's your wars, the man Wars, the fact location of sea

then again the politicians like governor abbot in texas and governor dissenters in florida, so they had the biggest teachers union is noting that there's just all kinds of problems related to schools you got your teachers shortages, your teachers, don't wanna teaching wars and culture wars and see forty wars and then politics Here's what I tweeted, I said that What one person can make a difference? That's all one person can make a difference. Absolutely nobody got the chuck you will have gathered that so by cute it up so knew what to look for, but. I I started to. I started to tweet find the common variable

she's tweeting that all these things going wrong. I'm thinking What do they all have in common? Her The only thing they all have in common is her completely different. Topics. Masks masks, culture, wars, it's all different topics: teachers, don t teach is all her It's all her systemic racism is her. We're not doing enough about climate change, its her Oh, you are not doing enough about climate change, because The entire. attire Several generations of kids have been trained to think the nuclear would kill. She's. basically, the one person who has more to do destroy the united states than Nobody ever has.

So when he asked can one person make a difference in this world yeah yeah? Barely one person can make a difference. I was my best work. So I tweeted today time's up now most people who follow me recognise that to be a follow up to buy tweet after the f b I raid and we are still in the fog of, were, I said, give my gun Forty eight hours to explain why it's I did something that needs an explanation. Why do the f b, I rate of former president, because it looks like a political act? Dont know for sure, but it looks like it so the case Where it looks so much like a political act, which would be the worst thing ever well, maybe not ever, but

will? We deserve an explanation doing that forty eight hours went by and I have not heard what I would consider and adequate explanation. I do understand these accused of doing something illegal documents. I do. Understand that if he did something then a certain category? It would be a felony I do understand that our law enforcement people are supposed to act on stuff like that. But of course you have precedent. Other people where the f b I didn't act- maybe it wasn't, it was a misdemeanor, then submit minister but there's lots to explain now for forty eight hours. I was open to the possibility. That they might have an explanation. Maybe because I couldn't imagine one that doesn't mean did exist because it could be just the lack of imagination, I can't imagine any reason why this would be appropriate, but maybe.

so you wait two days. Of course the country is is complaining. Of course, the f b, I am department justice now that the countries not happy about this, so where's our response. by sea. They caliber official response. I haven't. And so what do you do when you have a completely reasonable expectation, not a requirement? I mean I can't I can't Pose a deadline on the government but wouldn't you say that forty eight hours is a perfectly reasonable standard forest? What did you say something I would even allow that maybe they can follow up later. As some details, I forgot, but something Now, what do you do in the absence of those something face too? so phase two has begun

phase one was waiting for the fog of war to clear up and just see what they said just be open, there might be some other side to the story were young were beyond them. It is obvious that this boy, the water, we here will be discussed, cooked up bullshit. Does it doesn't take that long to tell the truth, it doesn't take long to tell the truth. The people who are in charge or believes that this was a good play, that they had done, something that the country would be happy with that we talk about it all day long. Would they not. Can you think of a reason that the government would not tell you more information if they were proud of what they them? If they thought they did good work, you don't think they'd be telling who doesn't tell you. They did good work, especially your government organization,

of course, so while we still don't know the whole situation we can move to face, do phase two is where you lock, given the assumption that there has been, criminal or inappropriate actively. So this we should as reasonable consumers of the news. And as reasonable watch watchdogs of our own government, we could move to face too Phase two is the assumption of guilt. They could still defend themselves. There is nothing to stop them from tomorrow. Giving me a good seller reasons where I say I will wish you said that earlier, but I understand why you waited and those a pretty good reasons be open to that totally up. But phase two. We have entered phase two the assumption of guilt by the Ask me I'd orbital justice and the white house. Now there are

Denials about whether the white house knew about it, I don't care. Do I don't think it's relevant that they denied it. Because we're the mode were just people regular, deny anything so denial, don't mean anything of this point. forty eight hours without a statement. Nothing they say after this is gonna hold too much credibility. Now. Why should you do. Like actually do in a world in which it appears let the f b, I lit the department justice have weapon ized against this segment of the population. What is the proper response to that? Well, when I, when I tweeted that we had entered face. Do I got to reactions pretty excited reactions from my critics, And they were opposites wishes we're,

there is a whole bunch of critics who come in. I think I think these group, or maybe paid trolls because there's something that a certain group acrylics always say that sounds like as a cookie. Her like they have instructions. What to say, and they usually pilot and say something about garfield or some other comic. To make too to minimize any impact there. So part of my Critics are saying, hey cartoon boy go draw garfield, which of course I don't draw, and the point of it is that, no no influence on anything, I'm just a cartoonist, and so I should be dismissed. You ve seen those right, so you followed me enter and there's a lot of those at in time that my critics you're telling me that. Toothless, seven over the hill.

irrelevant. I get excited comment from the sky. What's his name, schwab walter no shot? walter schaub, a he used, senior ethics. Fellow and a former director of the. government ethics. So he was quite concerned, is what you said about my statement that time's up, He said you're trying to incite violence, but you're too. What the cowards say it you'll, Hinton hint. and then when the violent starts, you pretend to condemn it. That's cowardice. No need to argue just embrace the cowardice to which I say would have become. for this to incite a revolution in public. I feel like

word coward doesn't mean what it used to mean. because I'm not exactly hiding, am I so look at a weird Weird accusation of that, I'm a coward. so, I tried to explain to him the following. I tried to explain that the the implied risk of violence What makes everything work everything the reason the legal system works when it does. The justice system is because the implied threat of violence, if you don't go, court. Somebody with a gun is gonna, go, get you The military works because the implied threat of violence or actual violence. And I would argue that every you will then interaction with another man is is guided by the threat.

even if you don't talk about it, even if it's not on might and somebody somebody complained to me and said scots scott. When I talk to my father, I'm not I'm not concerned about like violence, to which I say really try it? try pulling your father's pants, often shoving. You think up his ass does Complainer doesn't area now yet because. All those things that you allowed to do other things in your father allows you to do before. He is willing to punish the shit out of you You are always always gated interaction. by the implies, rather violence. This is no different. This is just business as usual. Am I inciting violence? No, no.

I am simply saying that all options are on the table because they always are if you say all options on the table, are you saying go be violent? No, you just saying it's always there. Oh, is that all always there I couldn't take it back if I wanted to, could I could I remove my threat of violence? If I wanted to know it could that is not removable? Why? Because, if you piss me off enough, I'm gonna be violent, There's no, you can't take that back. What am I gonna change by nature on board this way and I I think that almost all of you were born in the same way. Jordan petersen does a much better job of explaining this point of view. So I'm not,

copying his point of view, but I'm inspired by it. So don't blame him if I say something he doesn't say: that's that's all, but he is. He is my influence in this point of view, and so here's what I think about the risk of an armed revolution, no way we're not even close. You can completely stop worrying about it in my opinion, but is a useful there. Oh, who might want to try to push the boundaries of your flexibility, Is it useful that they know it's always there? I think it is I think it's useful to know that there is a line and that, if you cross it, there will be violence, No, I don't think that life has been crossed. This might opinion, and I don't think close, I don't they is close call, but so is there.

and I'm not going to apologize for I'm not gonna. Take it back. Here's a little advice, much of my audiences, conservative republican. Let me go some advice to any democrats who might have wandered in. If the republicans and the conservatives are still complaining, you're, fine, as long as you hear the republicans and conservatives just YAP, YAP, YAP Yap, complain, complaint and playing your five there's not to be a revolution. do you know when you should worry, if we want to fill in the rest of the sentence, tell the dollar them when they should worry. When the talking stops When the talking stops, you'd better flock hide.

or join the team. That has all the guns, because if the talking stops, that's when I get fuckin worried but nowhere near that we're not even close to that. we're not in the same solar system as anything like that. But let's be must be adults about it. The adult opinion is that violence is always an option and if you will take the child view that you can take violence out of civilization and still make it work. Explain to me how that works, to they are well? San Francisco is working when the threat of jail is gone away, jails, a form of violence- I would argue that jail is violence, is just a different kind, so

Let's be clear that we live in a civilization where, even if it was your best intention to remove all threat of violence from civilization, you wouldn't do it if you could, because everything we fall apart. So what do you do about it? Let me ask you: do you think one person could make a difference on this topic? Now, obviously, if that's trompe makes a difference, the butt, think that one person in the public was not elected could make a difference. probably, in my opinion, one person is the only thing that makes a difference. I think that all saying is the idea that one person can make a difference

almost as completely wrong as anything ever husband I mean I would argue that steve jobs made apple, even though everybody you workin in projects and stuff, but everything is just one person gets something going and then it picks up. Steamer doesn't Jesus is an example. I saw some examples like mohammed Jesus George soros. I feel I must give you love us, can make a difference to the others some examples where one person can make a difference: how many of you think some kind of a big national break up is coming. would like an actual armed revolution? Is by her things. That's actually like a risk. It really isn't really isn't.

But if I ever told you that the best way to look at life is as energy watch, where the energy goes worst way to understand. Anything is to look at the logic that that's another way to tell you that things have been telling you forever The if you want to understand, what's going to happen next. or even understand, what's happening now the law So you want to look at. Is the rational explanation of why you will look for the energy. because if the energy bills up somewhere, it's gotta, go somewhere, energy doesn't disappear, If there's one thing we know energy go somewhere. that you're gonna. Bring it into your body and make yourselves sick with stress, or you, gonna put it into the world and maybe get yours or beaten up, but is going somewhere. Where's it gonna go see. The trouble is this f b I read on trump

gave more energy to an energy monster from its energy. It's making him stronger and there's no question about that. you even the left is saying it directly uh. Oh, I think this makes them stronger because it does and he's playing it perfectly by the way the entire trump family is playing the story. They really are, and the whole thing about is closet. Well, that didn't come from the fbi. whoever started talking about melodious closet. I have a feeling that what you'd really fine now is that there might be there might be a safe in the same closet. does, that's not an uncommon placed for the safe in the closet. Am I wrong? Does anybody have her

Does anybody ever safe in the closet, like master closet, is fairly common right, jewelry centre so my guess is gases that will find out later, We're not rummaging through her. Her underwear jar I dont think maybe but I'll I think they gotta find out. They went into rooms that there might have been some storage and that's probably it but. the trunk family is playing a perfectly consistent assumes you throw in that cross dressing, edgar, J hoover. like in your mind, suddenly the fbi agents. Wearing women's clothing. You did not imagine the fbi agents wearing women's clothing, you did you, Imagine the fbi, agents, the man try on bologna is dresses is the most visual persuasion of all time.

Yeah, I told you that the term saying build the wall was good. Persuasion. Does the walls in the evening you mind it's: it's a visual, But there is nothing more visual, then FBI, is trying on bologna dresses. Now it didn't happen, but your mind can't help it. You just kill that you just put those things together. I'm sorry! I can't Of course, don junior helpfully. Has he helpfully? tweeted a meme that shows those alleged fbi plants in some earlier protest, but there there dressed in women's clothing,. the spread of me, and then he had the J edgar hoover allegation that you like to address in the women's clothing officers. Anything wrong with that by a modern standards. But it all that almost a story conflated you might so

I would say that the tramp of benefit This is so obvious and wrong that it makes you Wonder if there isn't something else to the story, let's see or something The story always seems that. There were some kind of insider that the f b I had I'd marilla logo who had given. information about what a legit confidential documents over there allegedly hidden from and allegedly word again referring to this person? Have you ever heard what they refer to this person this insider? What what call this insider there's another word they're using.

The mole, the mole, the mole. Let me you wind, you back in their way back machine rarer to roughly twenty sixteen or seventeen when. The Hillary Clinton campaign was so incompetent in their messaging in their slogan hearing there suggested there might be? a mole working for the the Clinton campaign who. pretending to be on their side but is giving the bad suggestions. For example, in memory, Hillary Clinton had the slogan it's her turn now does that sound like somebody who is really on her side came up with a it doesn't? Doesn't

It sounds exactly like a prank this like there's a bowl, who is in the room said I got an idea. You're, not a really good alike. The girl. If they say your gender is what makes you get elected. Try is her turn. That that will go over well people love to hear. That is just your turn. they don't want to hear what you can do for the country or why you're better than the other candidate. They just need to know it's your turn cause you're, a woman. Try that now you tell me that doesn't sound exactly like it was a prank can't even imagine the room where they thought. That was a good idea unless somebody had led them to it in a malicious way. So now we hear that the mole The mole, was. It really was a moral logo and told the fbi,

exactly where to look for the hidden documents. put us listless put two and two together here. If it comes out. If it turns out that the f b, I did get documents, are damning in some way What can we say about the story afterwards, we'd say well that mole certainly did not like donald trump. That's for sure, That was a mole who did not like that president. That's what's a good job, more more just right, but suppose just hypothetically suppose the f b. I ended up with no documents of any consequence whatsoever, except maybe some technical violation of handling document. suppose, there's a whole big, nothing. What would you say that about the mole

Team would you assume the mole was on. Because this is working out really well for trump and away that's hard to ignore. Am I right. so I'm not gonna allege. Do not allege that the mole is like the real mole somebody is actually working for tromp, as opposed to against but I will simply point out that the air It looks exactly like something more do now. Do you remember my prediction: did some of my prediction, early on in the forty eight hour period after the raid did ABC my tweet and in which I said this: Urge foreign underling to blame has begun. And here we are so as of today.

MSNBC, the other news entity. You you associate most closely with your own by the Democrats. They explained that the garland, who is a Democrat, so garland, haven't department. Just as a Democrat, they say he didn't know anything about it. So the Democrat who is in charge didn't know anything about it about the white house didn't know anything about. It know that nuts were supposed to work they're not supposed to El, the white house, right, they didn't tell the white house, there were gonna red trump now I do understand that you're not supposed to tell the white house in general, but they raided trump. That's not business as usual, so maybe that until the white house it is possible

yeah do you know who they decided? Is the one they're going to pin it on Christopher wray? You know why he was appointed by trump. And you know what the crystal array excuses gonna be because you know it's govern, did not it's gonna, be It was more like a bureaucratic message, because what the f b I wanted to do was to make it the lowest profile action. They could get their early in the morning and then be gone. if they had done it at a low key, you wouldn't have even noticed but let me suggest how it could have gone. Keep in mind that at mar. A lago was controlled by the secret service. Give me a fact check, but that's true right, because ex presidents get security, so wouldn't it be true, The moral logo is guarded full time by secret service,

now the news is that the secret service was, of course, the first to be alerted about the fbi's raid because you are the secret service to be your coordinating and not be surprised. So we know they coordinated. So now tell yourself what is the least now of visibility that the f b I could have applied to this if they wanted to remove Secret service already controls the premise: the already control it so I have to do- is get them on your side and you have full access as much as you want. what f b I agent in one safe cracker if he even needed a safe cracker, because I feel like you could have asked s for the combination doesn't work that way. If you have a warrant can't you ask the person who knows the combination to just open the safe

It might have been some stalling, so maybe they just bring the safe cracker kisses easier. So. the smallest number of people they could have done this with is just too little you just drive up to people in a car. There have to wear a special jackets to people in the car drive up talk to the secret service. They say Can you make sure everything secure in their and then, when you you're sure everything secure we'd like to go where they look for these three places. Here's my piece of paper. and then the secret service walks into the safe. They say. it words safe in master bedroom. Ok, let's go look at that You tell me why they couldn't do to people where they expecting violence. No, because the secret service owns the the property for all practical. So there is no risk of violence. It doesn't look.

it required a lot of people to carry anything away because they were. They were talking about storage of boxes and boxes or talk of a few documents. It sounds like maybe a box. Now, let's get back to the criticism that it was a bureaucratic fuck up. It looks like it to me. It does look like if they try to sell this as a bureaucratic mistake. It will look exactly like that. They can sell that here's. Why. it looks like the local office got too many people involved, and then it turned into something it was Imagine the story: if two f b, I age, showed up with a warrant worked with the secret service, got everything they wanted and then left with. Little handful of stuff. What would a story look like the store it would look like some people did their job. So does seem to be a credible, a credible

allegation that he has some documents that legally should be somewhere else. wait till the present, not their use, the smallest number of people, because you already control. You know the house, you just get it done now, because it was trump. You end up with the local police, force, right lights and action and everything else going on. So I I think that even if re approved it though, he saw tat he was approving, was something you'd, barely notice. I think you may he may have such a speculation. but I think he may have said all right if you're gonna get The language really small, basically you're, just gonna go out and get some documents will is not there, but the oh, it's hosted in and out clean, but instead it looks like

If bureaucracy had to do with the bureaucracy, did they have a you know a set of rules that they use in every situation, and so they go in big, because I think when you when F b usual. go in big, so there's no trouble right. Can somebody confirm that wouldn't the strategy of going in big b to suppress any push back. where'd you go in with overwhelming force and lights, and people with guns, stuff narrowed It just goes well aware, whatever everyone, whatever you want right. Is that not the point? I think that's part of this. So if you have a special case where thus completely unnecessary, because the secret service is gonna, be on your side is completely unnecessary, but it might have happened anyway, because a bureaucracy required right, the bureaucracy is just gonna do and it always does might not make an exception for this situation, so I think that they do. Ass. You can have an actual argument that it

the bureaucracy gone wild. They were doing is trying to get some documents back now they can sell that you might not it had one this syllable so watch for their common seems. Like that's worth going. Gonna come out. Then here's what I expect. I expect there's nothing damning in those documents. What do you think. I say: there's nothing damning in the documents. I don't think anything will be found. The other thing that they terms are doing this brilliant is suggesting that the f b, I might be planting evidence that really is perfect. If this ever happened to you and you and you weren't there to watch the f b, I do the work. The very first thing you should say is that I suspect they planted.

as a persuasion and illegal strategy. You do that right away you right away. the first thing you say as my god, nobody was there they could have planted anything. And then you say they have a history of doing exactly this. Do you know why? Because I have a history of of using fake information to get what they want. A recent history, you don't have to wonder, I wonder anybody in the fbi, whatever you know, invented the evidence. Yes, that's the court as demonstrated that's exactly what happened exactly what happened. So trump is just playing this perfectly persuasion, wise, I mean he's just killing it Anything else happily, This is the only news right now. If it's the only news,

not with the one thing I didn't talk about. Is this attorney in this connection to Epstein I didn't talk about enough the The only thing you should take away from the attorneys connection to Epstein is that, It would be in theory and I'll at zero. So is not an accusation. In theory, Such a person will be the most black available person in the world in theory because you would imagine that nobody would help them unless they guns and benefits themselves economy. Another alleging that I'm saying this First thing, you'd assume doesn't mean it's true, but your mind goes there immediately. So is it a coincidence that the most hypothetically black available judge and all in all the world is the one behind the actual warrant. Here's the other thing that you have to ask yourself.

About my understanding is that the one was showed to the attorneys for job but they were not allowed to hold a copy that was built I don't know that's true, let's be, I think, be reported now. You don't think that turn is got to look at it long enough to have an idea what what it said As trumps attorneys are acting like they don't know, what's on it, am I right now I get that they don't want. To paraphrase it does, if here an attorney, you might now want, to paraphrase a incorrectly or something yeah you wanna be specific, so attorneys need. The document like this is built into their dna. Don't talk about a document get the document. Somebody talking about a document doesn't mean much.

a document might mean something. So you can see why the lawyers don't wanna talk about the document that that could potentially be held in your hands, which would be the better outcome. However, however, If I were, if that, if the words, the things that I want the public to hear. I would tell the public right away because, as having managed to public opinion So if troms lawyers saw something on the warrant, that was absurd. I feel like we'd know it by now. Am I right if somebody on their said we need to check under your mattress or just some dumb ass thing that made no sense. You'd know that somebody would only But if all it says is something like we, we want to check your safe schedule. We think you have some documents they should. Then you don't think the lawyers virtual

read that and knew exactly what it meant and was no no ambiguity. It'll, oh you're, lucky in these three places for these specific documents, you don't think you don't think trumps. Lawyers know what that warrant said. Of course they do, they were showed the warrant they read it. They have memories are the attorneys. They can remember stuff right now, not telling you what they now is. Probably good strategy sprawly great strategy, because if they don't tell you was on their, your imagination will fill it in with the worst case scenario of ever taught you that persuasion lies. Here's a persuasion, tipp, then all embed in this lives through. If you can keep people wondering.

they will create more energy, because it's the not knowing that makes your brain spin. What what exactly is- and that word it must be bad financial, oh my god, so bad two days gone by and they're not even shows the work. While must be so bad So as long as long as trump, and the lawyers can maintain the story that nobody knows what's in the warrant, which is obviously false, that the trump team knows exactly what was in the warrant? At least you know in concert they don't? They still need the document to share with him, which would make sense, but they know, of course, they know. Now I'm being question that there's nothing in the world that explains why they're doing is- and I disagree. I agree that there is not the intention of the warrant.

so the intention of the warrant is not to tell you why they're doing so that by your correct, but where I disagree. Is that when they tell you what they're looking for that tells you why there there. I need somebody to whose a lawyer to disagree with me on this right, a guy. I agree the lawyer. Thank you. So, for example, if the warrant said we're we're gonna check three places for these documents, which we think you should have and we list the documents. You don't think the lawyer, so that probably is tell you what they're looking for specifically and where they're looking a kind of telling you what they're looking for now. now so this is the logic, is flawed. I'm not I'm not done That does not eliminate the possibility that this they're looking for one thing but the sort of hope and are going to find another thing of all

Is that why you want to tell me that they can pretend looking for aid, but the really looking for be theirs fishing, so so those those factors all afternoon. So here's my assumption. I believe that the trump team does not I want you to know what they're looking for yet, because the longer you were thinking about it, the more energy your building up in your minds and they need that energy trump wants. You'd have energy around this So if he told you the answer, you say: ok, let's have a reasonable, maybe by drain your energy way. So you keep an eye, They all knew what they were looking for, yeah, others love people knew what they were looking for. but we are told that is just some documents that are not relevant. Any legal case were told us. Just documents have some security.

So here is the question I ask, Is there any reason that the trump team did not negotiate too, the originals and let them take copies. does the national archive require the original, or could you negotiate So let's say that one of the items was a handwritten letter from jungle to drop. Let's just say that was one of the items if the, if the archives have a perfect digital image of it, do they need the original? Let's say you just wanted to keep a keepsake, because it might be valuable at some point, but it certainly be interesting to see afraid.

just wondering why should you do about this situation? Do do any of you feel like you need to act because of this situation?. You do know that ninety five percent of the people are not even aware of what happened like they ve heard there was a red, but they don't care. Most of the country. Doesn't care about this at all that this is very much. Fuel is sort of like an august story slow news month, so it so we get these manufactured story in august? So here's what you don't need to do. You don't need to clean your weapons and start marching on the capital? Can I say that as clearly as possible. because there are people who are trying to characterized me as inciting violence. I will be as clear as I can there

no cause for violence in what we say, nothing close nodded. Because we have a regular mechanisms to take care of it. We do we got elections coming up You can't do any better than an upcoming elections. Want to change something the double thing to do would be to get your weapons a month before an election. Nothing would be double than to stage an insurrection. Rabies or a rent, a probable red wave election. You could not be dumber than that, so don't be dumb. Now Let's say there was a red wave except the polls show that it was the opposite and the Democrats held power and one everything twenty twenty two, when twenty twenty four? Well, I have questions than we are Questions about our election security We might be at a point where trump,

when a re election, such a margin that cheating would be just too hard. You just couldn't get away with it. It does seem to me that these swing swing districts, including quakerism, quite scrutinised Somebody changed their affiliation to democratic and just to be safe and sound. About idea to re register is democrat just for safety. That's done about it. If there really is action I might do that. That's not a bad idea. I think I'm a registered democrat. What what would you say? What would anybody object to that if you heard that I registered as a Democrat, but I you know, I talk the same. Every everything's the same

it is registered democrat because I've actually thought. If I ran for office, I would run as democrats because it would be easy. it gives the Democrats easiest thing in the world and I could get republican votes fairly easily. You here you don't get most but I could get enough. Do you know how easy it would be to get republican votes? Show them respect. I'm done. I'm done. I just got twenty percent of republican votes. Show them respect. That's it! That's at twenty four there's nothing could be easier than willing election. As a Democrat you literally just have to show a little bit in respect of the other teams opinion. That's it.

and they'll they'll? Let you in I I think that was bill, Clinton's genius. You know he did the triangulating thing where he tried to be. You know not quite a democrat, not quite a republican, so everybody would find something to like that worked easily. I would say that bill Clinton showed republicans respect. Tell me I'm wrong yes or no bill Clinton showed republicans But I believe it is. I believe he did yeah and I think it was actually honest. No I'm not gonna call the politicians honest, but I think I think bill Clinton coming from a southern state being or a conservative democrat. I think it was an honest respect. I do, and I think I came across at way now compare that too. Clinton, calling the other side deplorable and anything that noise.

obama with his clinging to their bibles and guns and the the mistakes that the Democrats make Are you so obvious that the like these gigantic easy to avoid mistakes? I'll ask do- is treat them with respect. The way I would like to be treated and then I can be president of the united states That's all you have to do, treat him with a little respect, and then you can be present in the states I get absolutely become president as a Democrat. It would be that easy, but After the show complete respect to elsie s, point of view, which I do have believe it or not- I have complete, respect for the agency's unevenly elan o mars. In a way this newsome sketchiness too, opinions, but here's what I like about. I liked

Once we're saying we have to blow up the whole system because it's not working, and I think if you showed them respect and said you know what I like that thinking so much and I can't see how you could make that work. But can you come up with a small testament. Can we see if your ideas, america, maybe we will build a little community civil works? Run it your way if we learn, Well we'll take that forward, but if you abc you're crazy. listen, you say is a bad idea. That's no way to be present The way to be president say: that's that's more radical than we thought through, but I can help you get to the other side of this. Let's just tested. Why would you can about that is so easy to win the presidency. I showed you how easy it would be

You're good at wondering why nobody did it before I mean so easily, and I would argue that oh here's another one, I did reagan- and I I was maybe not paying attention as much in the reagan here didn't reagan, show, respect to the other team. Did reagan, show respect the liberals, know he always demonized liberals, but it was more of the liberal point of view. It wasn't.

I feel like reagan, was more about the philosophy he was attacking than the people but made. But maybe I just don't remember it right. Yeah there were reagan democrats exactly. He worked well with tip O'Neill. In those days things were a little bit more collegiate, so maybe that's a bad comparison. Yeah. He mocked. He mocked liberals for their point of view, but that's very different than mocking them. For being you know, clinging to bibles and guns and being deplorable, like reagan, never called liberals deplorable day The yeah alright mocking mocking the other side's ideas perfectly perfectly good, but going after the people is what the new democrats have done recently and that's not a winning combination. In the long run,

Now, how many of you would have set it with his would accept the following point of view. We ve never been stronger. country every generation thinks that everything's falling apart now I was watching I mentioned this before, but I was watching newt gingrich's he's got a show about washington, george washington. It's called the first american. I believe I forgot that I didn't know the title. The first time I talked about it, so it's called the first american and when you find out how close washington was washington was losing everything his army at one point was just like twenty five hundred people? Twenty five hundred barefoot people with no ammunition- you know, as things were, were pretty grim

but the united states has been teetering on the brink of extinction. First, four hundred years you ve got your civil wars etc and the sixties, if he lives in the sixtys it looked like the host country, was coming apart. But it didn't. If you look at anything that we have experienced in our you know hundreds of years of history, and then you compare it to what's happening today what's happening today. Is people getting mad, Whether there's literally nothing happening, there would get you, we're near a civil war when, when the country, about. Oh, we need a national divorced everything, that's what the states are. You can go to a state like. And it will happen overtime right, so you don't need national divorce if everybody can just have multiple lovers. Worst analogy ever the states are like your mother.

the lovers. If you dont like new Hampshire, you always have texas, you know like florida. Well, you got California So it is always diversification and multiple lovers. You don't need to break the whole thing decided another lover. corporations have too much power, maybe I wonder what the world would look like if they didn't you I get the idea that the corporations have too much power, blah blah blah. Everybody agrees on that, but why would it look like if they didn't? Because I don't think we ever count the good things that corporations do, which are amazingly good yeah? We talk about their pollution or whatever white collar crimes and stuff, but I think corporations have really moved society.

Forward or all the transnational do now, loyalty was too, but they don't need it. Market competition is better than loyalty. Iran sent a hitman for John Bolton and MIKE pompeo. Somebody say is that in the news the news isn't reporting that is it really and I miss that well interesting. What? What would you assumed to be true if that news surfacing now. feels like a build up toward as it feels like a build up to war

because I don't know that information gets out accidentally that feels like the most topsecret secretive stuff. You, the rat, multiple reports, I do you think that around would be done enough to do that now, given granted, we took out their generals, but you think they would. Maybe I'm not going to rule it out, but it would be a terrible strategy because the united states would have to basically change their leadership. If that happened the day before yesterday, as far as a pay back first soul, money, also those a reward out for killing that's a little different.

A reward, Alfred killing them is a little different than sending man. That's that's different. It's not good was deftly different. That sounds more like wishful thinking that would unify their country. Well, it would unify the country, but the government would be vaporized. It's a contract, not a reward. It's a contract! Okay! Well, if it's a contract, For somebody specific to do it unnecessary for men were identified for specific ones, I'll be known.

The number with all the north got the government to pay for some security at his home, and there was big question about that, because he he thought Al Qaeda was going to try to kill him or somebody something it sounded silly that wasn't silly. Well, I thought if I really wanted to start the in time of war, they would have already done it. So I think that the iranians Their leadership is bright. Look at it the same risks as anybody else. well. That, ladies and gentlemen, concludes the best live stream. You ve ever seen.

I'm going to get back to mocking my critics, the ones who are making bad garfield references to me. I've invited everybody who is a failed writer or an unsuccessful artist, to make comments today about my one one level of my skill stack and boy: are they so error? Whenever I get them today, I'm just going to retweet my invitation for them to do it. Oh my mask, I came back. I was worried that Keith Olbermann maybe was injured or dead, but he came back today. So he's he's he's on me again today and my mascot is awesome. Alright. Well, if I can get Keith Olbermann to be mad at me on twitter.

it's a good day. Ok, the dilber you help with was published today, good about the About not getting everything back in the packaging yeah that did come from. I think that does come from you pardoning would be genius pardoning who so there's a lot of noise about andrew tate? Is anybody watching all the attention is getting andrew date. Is it s, got a fascinating, as is. If you don't know, I'm just imagine andrew days clay, but without the without the creativity but was,

the strong hamas erotic undertones, So just imagine andrew dice clay, but homoerotic. Now I'm not saying he's gay, I'm just saying: that's the that's how he that's, how he presents himself so he's doing a good job of getting attention, but being the andrew dice clay jr with the homoerotic overtones, do. although that can take them, but it's taken them pretty far. So far as a nation in decline, video aboard me, I tried to watch the video- I guess trump in a nation in decline and tried to tie it to the f b. I raid dunno bored me.

Did I mention Darth Brandon? Well, it's so weak that you know the Democrats tried to do what republicans do and that they try to take the negative stuff and turn it into positives, because trump does that all the time, but they can't quite do it. Yet this whole dark brandon thing is trying to make Biden, look awesome, which is directly copying the mega people treating trump like your god, warrior kind of thing, there's just not good at o the installations try this. Ocean story was hilarious, so Joe Biden getting up there and say I've got one number to tell you that inflation, zero We had zero inflation. Then there would be said. Inflation is up. Eight point, five percent.

but what he meant is it didn't get any worse than that now? Is it technically accurate? Therefore, inflation rate is eight point five percent and it doesn't get bigger than that, though you ve ended inflation. I feel like that was a sort of data that the president should have a little firmer grasp on is inflation or no. Now here's how I interpreted If you had a one time, price increase of eight point, five percent and then nothing ever increased after that. Let me yes, that would be the end of inflation. So I think that's how I then understood it. I think he understood it. As prices went up. But now they're not going up anymore. However, that's not what that eight point. Five percent means.

What it means is that is a rolling forever everything's going up a probably five percent. You know as we go now that gets revised every month when you see your actuals but yeah. The fact that that eight point five percent stayed stable is the of not having inflation. That would be having a lot of inflation tons of a boy five percent a lot don't get distracted from it? Yes, she so is she I've got a week or more of comics. Coming on that topic, I think that's a september you'll see those and I'll talk more about that,

Do you other? Do I ever jam with other musicians, only my drum teacher who plays the guitar, so we do jam. My lesson is mostly jamming these days and the inflation reduction act isn't troubled because the f b I raid, is it I dunno, Every boy look at our now, probably for christmas. I I need a basis during an open, jan I'll. Think, I'm up to

quite jamming with anybody, except my music teacher right now. Alright, that's all I got for now and I think you'd agree. This is the best live stream you've ever seen, and what about dreams that we'll get to that and now I say goodbye to youtube and I'm going to talk a little bit more to the locals people bye for now.