Good morning everybody and whoa whoa wow. Is it my imagination, or are you better looking today than yesterday, yeah sexier sexier? Well, on that positive note, how would you like the rest of the day that go as well as that you would, and all you would need- would be a copper, mug or glass tankard chelsea sign the canteen jug of alaska vessel of any kind filling with your favorite liquid, I like coffee, enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure as a dopamine the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip an app and then it's the best thing that ever happened to go.

Feel my mitochondria are repairing themselves a little bit faster or systems go So would you like to hear about all the good news? Isn't it weird that I keep telling you that we're going to enter a golden age, but you listen to the news and it's all like wow. The world is falling apart. Everything's bad at wow years. Positive things that are in the pipeline is a company is made some big breakthrough in babbling, auto immune problems, which could include things like lupus and am ass, some really big stuff, and apparently they ve got something that looks like it. Works really well. Now, the details doesn't matter because remember the rule

I the rule. Would I tell you about a breaking breakthrough. New technology was the rule. When I tell you about a breakthrough new science or technology, the rule is we're going to pretend it's true, because both of these end up not being true there without being big disappointments in the end, but our agreement with each other is we'll pretend that are all true cause. It feels good if it turns out later, is not true. Well, you're, not really worse off your shell good for awhile, so we're going to take the feel good okay, so it looks like there might be a breakthrough in lupus and their mess and other auto immune stuff and thanks to Machiavelli's underbelly. For tweeting some other good news. It looks like a flying carl happened in my lifetime. There's one is being funded, is already built and is based

ilia, it's like sitting on top of a hobby drone. If you just took one of those little drones, so you can buy in the store and but little cab on top of it like a car, that's what it is! Basically a four roeder for roads situation. Now. Remember I told you the only thing we were waiting for yoke is flying. Cars have been the thing we ve talked about forever, the things we've been waiting for are here, ai to make sure that the thing can stay, stable the batteries that are powerful enough to take people long enough that we have everything else, so the flying car might not be able to get licensed. You know there might be government regulations and stuff, but we can build it now is done there. There we have the technology

Likewise, there's accompany this already built a functioning flying motorcycle. It's very similar to what I just described, except instead of having a automobile cab on top of a drone. Imagine motorcycle situation so you've got your motorcycle handles and you're just sitting on top of a drone. It just is a big one that already exists in the sense that there are already demo ing it and driving around in space. Thus, facebook and air, so we are flying. Cars fly motorcycles, auto immune disease

The company also working on fuel cells for drones, which doesn't seem like a big big deal, except that these fuel cells will extend the you know. The range and the power of the drones substantially like a really big deal now doesn't mean they'll catch on. Maybe nobody will ever buy a fuel cell drone, but the fact that we can do it is certainly actually interesting. I was yesterday what are the odds there? I would be borne- and many of you too, so that I can see that

following things that will only happen once in the history of humankind. What are the odds, for example, the the development of the computer? The computer was built and developed in my lifetime. How many humans will be born and die over the course of human civilization, and and human biology. What are the odds that I would be alive when computers are developed now and space travel exactly to go to the moon so as space travel, artificial intelligence? Now, in my opinion, artificial intelligence is also is already sentient

But then we just get into arguing about definitions, but I believe the ai will be sentient in my lifetime. That's only going to happen once ever the first time anyway. What are the odds of that? What about the virtual reality? The metaverse? That's only going to happen once it's happening in my lifetime. Flying cars, the first ones are only going to happen once looks like it's going to be my lifetime. What are the odds of that really? Doesn't that seem weird later, like that? That's one of the arguments for this being a simulation and for me your player in a game, because I can't really understand the odds of it. A lesson. a player in the game and it's designed so I see more stuff it is as a weird coincidence.

Have you ever thought about all the old, also digital currency, digital money, grip. although my lifetime and that's just like a small sample of things that are happening just in my lifetime. But here's some things that you have to stop and think about. The things that have changed permanently because of the pandemic So I'm going to give you a starter list of things that permanently changed during the pandemic and then add to it. So in the comments you probably couldn't think of a few more, so food delivery. I don't think will ever be the same. I suspect kitchens might just disappear. It will just be deliver my food all the time. It's just cheaper and easier, and healthcare will change forever, especially the online.

Occurs on zoom working from home change, forever supply chains. We can change forever decoupling from china, especially All of our energy systems will change so will have a complete change of energy. I might, I might be alive during nuclear fusion being developed. It looks like it was like this can happen. I suppose I might just barely be, Then. Maybe so oliver energy systems are being retooled, trust in institutions completely different.

The the way the world feels about any official institution is completely different. Now that's going to have some expense, I don't know what happens with that, but that's not and nothing that's a big deal. We just don't know how that's going to come out and I think also these factory built homes. I dunno, if it's because the pandemic, but this is boom. In these factory bill homes I can sort of delivering just put together now less combined a few concepts this combined the idea of relocating the the homeless, which is the wrong name for them. You know we should stop calling the homeless If they don't want to home, because they don't emotion

We should call them the outdoor livers or just the need just the outdoor people, because their preferences round doors, that's the main thing. I just Let us be outdoors, we get more freedom at work in a way you can call them the free. In a weird way, they are the freest among us. Are they not? Who? Who is more free than street people? They can do all the drugs they want. seems builder violate the law at will.

Go anywhere that can trespass I dunno they. Should they don't have they don't have a job, they have to be too. They don't have a boss, they don't pay taxes exactly. I call them campers campers that would be funny. That's the funniest was instead of calling the homeless call them campers, that's just getting funnier, as I think about it. Campers, I'm sure somebody so your big, incisive, alright, so there's a whole bunch of stuff. That's going to happen in my lifetime, a lot of it accelerated by the pandemic, but if one here's what it feels like it feels like the wheels are coming off. Doesn't it The reason is, dunno, inflation is gonna, kill us and the immigrants will change the nature of the country.

Climate change will be a mob up, whatever humans are surviving than the racism or put us at each other's throats. Everything else is it really worse than it was in the sixties or any of you old enough to remember. The sixties doesn't feel worse. Does it or somebody you say. Yes, you think is worse than the sixties. I think that might be selective memory, though in the sixties we thought that russia was going to nuke us there's no way I would live to die of old age cause. I get nuked yeah, it's better televised. Well, it feels like we're in some big rebooting phase. That's what it feels like to me in order to get to the new thing you have to go through a bad thing. It's almost always true. If you want to build a house, you usually have

I do demolition first cause there's already one there, usually in all the good locations. So if you want to get- and if you want to The radar you have to have world war, two sorry. It's the only way you're going to get radar. I know it's probably not the only way, but there are a lot of things that got accelerated, and maybe this maybe the pandemics, just a big reboot program It feels like well, Michael Lindell, as you know, was, and what would you call it? He was stopped and surrounded by f b, I agents and they took his phone that they have now access to my glendale, and I don't believe he has been charged with a thing. Is that right, there's there are no indictments against MIKE lindell that I'm aware of he was targeted, but we don't this ain't charges- I suppose they don't know either until they look at his buddies body, use each region

and alan dershowitz to sue the fbi and the department of justice, to which I say good for you good for you, you know what I you know what I think the government or the Democrats years already think the Democrats have totally underestimated here's. What the Democrats, I believe, have totally underestimated. Two words MIKE Lindell. I feel like they underestimated them. Am I wrong because I don't think he's out of money he seems to be I dunno. Maybe he took a big hit with my pillow just by speed. boy you does it was like you're willing to quit right now. The game that you play with somebody like him, as you hope you can scare him off before it gets to serious and it was very serious to start

but it looks like they're, not scaring them off and he's just getting more aggressive. So is he the guy you wanted to piss off? He obviously has skill. He's got a lot of capability, I mean he built a company. You know really was his personality if anything else. So in a sense it looks like the government may have found a worthy nemesis, because I think he's going to take it too will say I dunno, I don't think he got where he is by loch view, may looks like skill. It looks like he's good. I'm gonna get stuff that for now, but the interesting development see if he could make something out of this. The said that to persuade the government to do more and fentanyl, we should produce pictures of three hundred dead bodies every day.

And Machiavelli's underbelly asked an ai to do that and sure enough. So I tweeted this morning, a group of bodies that looks like they died on the capitol steps. Now I would improve that by making them instead of spread out on the field, I wouldn't spread them out on the field. I'd put them in an actual pile, so it's the pile that actually sells the story. It's not the number like if you just have

Row of people who dies that wouldn't be persuasive, you need the pile cause, the pile tells you how you're treating the dead you've treated them like they didn't matter. That's what the pile says. A group of people dead in the field says something bad happened. While we already knew that right. But if you put them in a pile, it says not only does something bad happen, but we don't care we'll just throw them in a pile and, and so if we can tweak that I'd put them in a pile, and I would take the american flags often cause I ended up being accidentally patriotic. I think the ai wrapped all the bodies in an american flag. So let's get the positive imagery away.

And plugged it in into just purely horror, we'll see what that does, and so yesterday I did a number of reframes for republicans telling them how to sell their own policies better, and I turned those into a series of little videos. Switch reframe has it's own little two or four minutes whenever it is and that's on my channel. If you want to go see that I was asked to put that into a playlist which all work on today so put that into a playlist, but I tweeted it. I tweeted somebody else's playlists this morning. So if you want to see the whole list of just look at my twitter. So governor newsome, my governor you're in california, has challenged Or is governor around his to a debate as a guest dissenters said something

humorous and insulting about nuisance, hair, jail. and the newsome said. Hey dissenters clearly are struggling distracted, busy playing politics with people's lives, leading the Martha's vineyard. I we'll talk about that. The years I'll bring my hair gel, you bring your hairspray name the time before election day, and I are now speaking of underestimated. Are you underestimated? newsom because he's not a guy. You want to underestimate. You know that right. He really does he's got the whole package. He does have the whole package. So if you're underestimating him, that's that would be a mistake. He does have the goods he could bring it. So again, that's from a young.

Democrat respect perspective. But what is it you, this idea of whom challenging the governor from another state that are not even running against each other or will weigh, or will they maybe not this election? Maybe the next one. One also could be this one. It could be Could be this one, it's hard to imagine newsome primary and Biden, but it's possible, it could happen. That's a weird or or Biden could drop out or so But I like the idea completely at any time to politicians, are willing to debate in public and they're, both capable and within that was different and others

these are two media stars who are super capable. I would love to see that debate and especially, if there's nobody else on stage. I don't like these eight people debates. Do I mean that's, that's barely anything but a few soundbites, but you could have an actual debate between two highly capable people with different

buildings that wouldn't be very useful, so I would say: newsome you get the win on this one, because he's asking for something that I as a consumer would like to say. As a citizen I'd like to see it, so I don't think it's going to happen. Do you think is gonna happen? Newsome is going to debate his republican contender for californian, which is appropriate, but now I don't think that's ever gonna happen. You know what the best news of the year is: what is the best news of the year? I'm going to say? Is she just answers, shipping, the migrants? The illegal immigrants, as you like to say or undocumented, pick your phrase up to Martha's vineyard. This is the only story I can think of where every

They came out ahead and also have something to complain about which is also coming. I've had correct me if I'm wrong, but the the migrants themselves, those whom unhappy in fact their profits being treated pretty well, so the migrants are fine, I was saying that don't see any problem got a little attention was a little exciting. Imagine being a migrant. You just came from some horrible situation, and next thing you know you're on tv in america and Europe Martha's. weird, and you don't know where you going end up, but it looks like it looks like the country has embraced you that's what I would think.

if I were a migrant, I would think the country has embraced me because one party sent me on a nice trip to a good place and then, when we got there that that place made sure I had food and a place to stay, I dunno abba isn't axed, I'm not sure what happens after they get taken from their cages are probably in. I don't know what happens after that, but so you've got the republicans who are delighted because, as a political stunt, it was really good as political stunts go. It exactly made the case that the Republicans wanted me. They got all the attention they wanted. It did deepen the conversation, which is what they wanted. I'd say the Republicans won now how about the Democrats they want to so they won because they said yes, we will take care of them and then they did what

their version of taking care of them. Is we just send them off to some military base, but that took room? In my opinion? That's not cheating. I know that The right leaving news is so lacking, like that's, cheating Oh, you didn't keep them in Martha's vineyard. You ship them off to a military base, to which I say it doesn't matter how you do it. I I think the migrants one. I think the Democrats made their point. They actually treated it like a sanctuary. They they took care of them.

Then send them to jail. I guess so. For some weird reason: the the migrants won, the Democrats won and the Republicans won. Everybody won, nobody died and nobody got injured. Everybody ate nobody got a sunburn taxpayers lost well, did they. I dunno, I'm not even sure taxpayers lost because it costs money, but it was money that deepened deepens the debate in a way that I think is productive. Actually, so this is one of the most weirdly win win in productive things, a country's ever done and the fact that were both of the Republicans Democrats,

Are accusing each other of being the hypocrite? It doesn't get any better than that that that is, that is peak awesomeness. Everything about the Martha's vineyard story is good everything even the way we're complaining about it as good as if that's all we have to complain about we're in pretty good shape. I guess it's no fun to talk about inflation nonstop. We do have real problems, but this wasn't one and I do love the republican theory that if there's a part of the country, the says, hey, it's a sanctuary and you're welcome and there's another part of the country that the citizens are like, maybe knows much here. Why isn't this a win for everybody? If it's a sanctuary, take him to the sanctuary in the way the wage censuses explained, I think, was perfect.

we're, not a sanctuary city, you Martha's vineyard, is a sanctuary city. Where does an immigrant wanna go an illegal immigrant? Where do they want to go? Did they want to go to the place? It doesn't want them or the place this as a sanction, come on it, as is weirdly win, win win even though it's just a political track, its awareness situation? but this is the sort of thing that proves were imported good shape. The fact that this is what we're talking about. as somehow, because world dumb, we ve, managed to make this real problem, which is where the debacle at the border,

if you think about the border and the other struggling people trying to stay alive and coming in and how we're treating us like a big big, hard problem, but once the news put it in Martha's vineyard, it became a sitcom. Oh, look: it's people. It's a fish out of water story. It's a. is fresh, prince of beverly hills. Look we took somebody who is not normally in the high end environment. We put it in a high end environment there will be other table we. Where am I right? We took an actual human tragedy An ongoing rolling tragedy and we turned it into this little humorous sitcom. and now nobody thinking well not nobody. This is education. diverted are energy from a real problem. To this like sick coming

thing fish out of water, fresh, prince of beverly hills situation. I think it trivializes a little thing, but it did it did what the Republicans wanted it to do. It told the story that they wanted to tell, and it looks like the is going to be sending some more. So we'll see more of this, there was some fake news around this and there were some immigrant activist person. In other words, somebody who is pro immigration. tweeted something paraphrasing, but something along the lines of the way dissenters was treating these migrants? According to this person, was whose is it He had been driving around and soyuz trash out the windows from his car and then what does the people in the re said? Are you calling? Are you calling the migrants trash

who have a great you're supposed to be on their side than NBC retrieved it. You know, that's all fake news right, did you all they will you fool, but she's all faint moves. The original tweed was accusing dissenters. the trade in the migrants like trash? There's no other way to read that, but somehow, if you got fooled into thinking the personal tweeted it we're saying that either the marthas vineyard people or the person tweeting it thinks that migrants are trash you Illegal, got taken by fake news, as is all over the right. The right is just leaning on this hard as completely fake. It lou think somebody said something bad about.

The scientists and the people on the right decided to tell you that it was the opposite of what was. There was something bad about migrants that never happened, never happened. It was just a comment about the senses, but it was the alien, a political environment. The republicans tried to turn it into a weapon. I was fake, is to work as a weapon. I was now where this until yesterday, that our government is copying, china copying, but were

apparently, the. U s. Government is going to have its own digital currency, at which point they can track everything. Now they're they're close to being able to track everything, but only for people who have money if you're poor and you pay in cash. They can't track you so well. But if you have a credit card of any kind, oh they can track the hell out of you already, but once you have a digital currency, one assumes that everything will turn digital. Eventually, then you can't cheat. The government gave an underground business. She can do any sketchy deals. I don't love. You gonna wanna, live in that world, but I'll just say they allowed people around

trouble living in a world where they can't cheat. What am I supposed to say that out loud because people don't say it that way, but that's all that's what it is. People are very uncomfortable living in a world where they can't break the law and cheat because people want to be able to break the launch. It is a very popular, I want you to go you taxes taking cash. People really really want to do that stuff, so will save the government gets away with it. I think they're. Well, What are the weirdest predictions I made? Maybe fifteen or twenty years ago in my book, the dover future, I predicted that all crimes would be solved in the future and this sounded ridiculous, but I saw this coming once you can. You ve got everybody on video and you can manage everybody.

Transactions? How the hell do you do crime anymore? If we've got a picture of you and we've got your all of your records of where you were and what you spent and what you bought, you can't get away with anything it. This will first of all get rid of the street mugging because there won't be any cash, so there's a whole bunch of robbery that will just go away because it won't be cash, there's a lot of crime that will go away, but his crime that we're used to. We all think that we have a right to that kind of crime like well. You know everybody cheats on their taxes a little bit, so why can't I I avoid that theory, because I'm a public figure, so I'm really careful on my financial world to keep that. Keep that completely legal. You don't want to make that mistake.

Yeah they can steal credit card, so I suppose I can steal your passwords for your crypto, so yeah, there's that risk is there, but I'm not sure that the common street criminal will be still in business when you have to be a hacker to steal something. If all you knew was a gun. There is a lot more accessible business. Well, here's the update on ukraine- and so yesterday was yesterday. Some of the comments here were saying that when russia took out that dam that it might have been a clever, you know super evil move to strand part of the ukrainian army, so it can be destroyed by the russian army. That might be an overstatement as

then, maybe russia would like you to believe that that was to their favor, but it doesn't seem to be true on the ground, exactly mean it might have made a difference, but not a big difference, and so I. There doesn't seem to be any narrative saying that russia has the ability to counter attack the counterattack, meaning ukraine is on the offensive. And one opinion I saw this morning is that Russia's military is designed as a occupation force and not so much a fighting force, and this is true- and I have a hard time, believing that's true.

But if it's true, then the ukrainians are an offensive force against aidan, basically, a non fighting force, which is what it looks like. It looks like one one came to fight and the other came to squat and the squatters are being killed by the people who came to fight now, keep in mind that one hundred percent of anything that I say about ukraine could be completely wrong, could be them. Reading the wrong propaganda feeds have no idea, but I'll tell you what you don't see anywhere. You don't see it coming from russia, and you don't see anybody else saying, which is that the russians are making any gains. Now Putin did say they're taking new terrorists,

Sorry, but nobody believes that right. Nobody believes they're taking new territory. I don't think so. At this point, the the I would say the forming consensus from the experts who are close enough to have an opinion and are making it look like the ukrainians will be able to liberate that that area. Now russia, of course, as options for stepping up the the risk and the danger, maybe destroying the rest of the infrastructure in ukraine with long range weapons. they'll, be pretty bad, but they don't seem to have the ability to fight on the ground, a guess ukrainian advances. So what's up with that, and I tell you again that how can you hold territory

When all of your local leaders, who would be the collaborators with russia they'll all be murdered because there's there's no way you could protect the collaborators, could you how are any collaborators ever protected because they still go outdoors? I mean they still a fan. I just don't know how you can do it now. I understand that you could do it before the war had reached this level of conflict like yeah Russia had their little area that they controlled and they probably just said, if anything happens, to one of our side really bad things are going to happen to you, but if the context is that really bad things are happening to everybody every day What a war is then suddenly the the locals. I guess I you know I'm in the middle of a war zone and there's a collapse?

they're over there walking through the public square, I'm just going to take that guy out so as to be at an all time high right now we're worth doing, because maybe he killed a few collabs the situation, but now you're at a point where killing collaborators definitely could change the situation, definitely good, because if any, if nothing else, it would convince russia that there's no way to hold the territory. You just keep killing the collaborators as fast as possible. Yeah see the difference was that

parties had they have another way to control populations, which was collective punishment, so the nazis could say: oh you killed one of ours. Give me five hundred of your men will align them up and shoot them in front of you, and that would work. I think, but that's not the situation that you think I don't think Putin can do that like if he goes full full hitler in that very specific way, I don't feel like he could survive it and we'd know about it, so he just doesn't have the tools that you know a true despot would have working against. Basically, his own people, the ukrainians and the russians have too much in common.

Putin has already done that with civilians. I doubt it. I don't. I don't doubt that there have been war atrocities, but I don't think Putin has ordered people to line up civilians and shoot them. I don't think that it may have happened, but I don't think he ordered it and it would be a dumb thing to order

so the texas supreme court order that the social media platforms can't censor people's voice, and I don't quite know what this means. Yet you know Texas is big enough- that the social media platforms left either satisfy them or not operate in their state. Do you think they're going to give up on texas because it seems like other states, will follow suit since this? Well, I mean I dunno. Maybe this goes to the the real supreme court. Maybe it gets overturn, but if this holds then I would think other states would take a look at it and then social media platforms are going to have to get pretty serious about changing something anyway,

And as our experience and celebrating this victory, when what is your opinion of it, I don't want to bring this up as a topic, but I'm only interested in the data collection. Part of it do, you think, is possible at this point there all the different medical experts around the world would say nothing about vaccinations if they were actually more dangerous. In general, we are talking about the special care.

Instead of vaccinating children, I dunno who's in favor of that, but in the case of vaccinating anybody you know just anybody who makes sense to get vaccines. Do you think that the all the experts in the world are seeing data that says it's more dangerous than not doing it and yet they're all doing it? Or do you think that they're all seeing evidence that is working not as vaccine, but as a therapeutic and pre therapeutic, Whatever that means so so there there here's what you would have to believe, you would have to believe that there is no whistle blower in any country in an official capacity, who's willing to say, wait, a minute, wait, a minute you're. Looking at this data, this data says it's sketchy. Why are you all saying it's not

Where is that person? Because there there are plenty of people outside the system, yeah the the malone's etc? The last people outside the system who are saying stuff like that, but why nobody inside the system? Now your first impression is well. They can't take the risk, they can't take the risk, but it's a really big world. There are always enough people to take the risk. There is no shortage of people to take the risk if you're talking about the whole world, if you're talking about a specific company or departments within the company, yeah yeah may nobody, takes a risk, but you talk about all the medical experts, all the scientists in the world, we have access to largely the same information at this point. that with all those experts, if there were,

All the data saying that the vaccinations or injuring people more than their helping, you saying that we will know that by now that we're not how they met the future that still unknown, but but people a lot of people think that the evidence still completely here. Somebody says fear and money, but here is my warning: to always there's no such thing as honour percentage humans do the same thing for either. And it's amazing how many times we make that mistake to imagine that people would like the same. So so here's the mass of it if you have one person, And that's the story is only about one person. Can you trust that person will act like himself. Oh probably is one person acting like themselves. If you have to people in a story,

Could you imagine that they would act like, in tandem together sure it's crazy for two people to collude three people kessler, ten people harder, but when you get to millions millions of people who could potential, You'll be a whistle blower debunk, we're not even be a whistle blower just send out a tweet just send out a tweet hey. doctor I'm reading the study and the study is telling me something bad. You tell me there's no one doktor, who is still in the system we won't put out that to eat that would that would be different than everything we know about everything. that would change everything about reality. If that were true

There is no reality where millions of people are on the same side, none that is not possible. That was that this is a great barrington declaration of those people who were working currently within jobs that they haven't been fired, mass delusion ass, the lesion. When do it? I don't think you would do it see. Mass delusion also doesn't get. Everybody is the every body problem. It is not. The majority problem is the everybody problem, so doktor drew is talking about. It said shovel is that the people who are saying negatives about it can

it'd be the people who talk about things in public, but we're not saying, like you know, a member of the top medical team of some european countries say you know we're all looking at the same information, but I'm looking at this differently. This doesn't look good to me anyway. Keep that in mind. What are the odds? I guess the in pennsylvania, the two candidates for senate famine and I have decided to debate, I'm gonna watch thou on because one of the debaters,

I had a stroke vitamin and we don't even know if you're getting debate, because his public appearances have suggested that, for health reasons, it's difficult for him to form sentences. How do you debate if you can't form sentences reliably? Will you get a sympathy vote? Well, apparently, Democrats have already said they don't care, so they Democrats have said well if his policies are good

we don't need them to build a talk and think and walk and stuff like that, and I think Biden made that easy, so she thinks sediment can't win because he's obviously degraded. You have to keep in mind that the republicans the Democrats have looked at two years and Joe Biden who's, clearly degraded and they're, saying to themselves yeah that worked. That worked, give us some more of that because it works so well with Biden. Why? Wouldn't it work with this other person who can't walk and talk, went up so I think the the room that was softened up by Biden alright. Well, it's a slow news day and I dunno what else we have to talk about? Do you is there something I missed was array or is that really a neck tumor? He has or is that just neck fat fetterman? I can't tell there some pictures of him. Looking like he's got a big ol lump on the back of his neck, but might be just a neck fat. I did republican strategist reach out to me. No, no! Nor, nor would I expect them to say the trouble is, if you're a strategist, you think you don't need other people's advice, because you're selling your device, the the people who are selling advice, are not going to ask for my advice, because people can get that for free, imagine being a high priced consultant or you're, let's say you're charging.

well hundred thousand per month, which is probably in the ballpark right high end strategist hundred thousand per month. Are you going to charge one thousand per month then bring to the person who's, paying the bill, an idea that you saw for free on twitter or youtube? I mean I'm not sure how you do that. Oh yeah, I'm charging you one hundred thousand per month, but you know if you would just watch this youtube channel for free you'd have everything you need. So let me just show you the youtube channel and you give me my one hundred thousand dollars for this month. I dunno it's pretty hard really hard. What about James clear I like, where you're going with that comment, but I dunno where it's going and Scott cover the agree on topic argument on January six that I didn't locals and I'm pretty tired of explaining what what did I say about that? Well, I, if I just rethink it from scratch, I'll probably come come to the same place. The Republicans need to say that the assault on the capitol was terrible, the violent parts and that we should move on and that we should agree that both sides should work hard for election transparency and integrity. It's a winning message because it's not like they're going to go back in time anyway. It wouldn't matter how how bad it was. Now the re ups thing. I've also said we should make a national agreement. The Democrats are,

wilkins. Independence, too, is to base our entire opinion on ramps. Now he doesn't explain everything, no matter what you know about them. It doesn't really explain everything, but we can agree that he does imagine imagine if we looked into it and we were convinced all of us that he really wasn't an f b, I agent as possible right very possible. What would you be willing to drop it then all right all right, we don't know what happened, but let's agreed move on is the re ups thing is nothing less agree to move. Even this there's something there which I will try to fix it for the next But what if you find the other rapture actually was working for the fbi ira associated with them some productive way? Then and you get to say, are we were right release all these people from their prisons?

and and then still focus on the future. So the the bad argument. Is there was nothing there one wrong on january sex that just a bad argument. Maybe even worse, to say. Oh just a few few violent people, I'd rather just say I was a horrible thing. Let's, let's

move on, let's find out what we can about re ups and then just move on? How can you prove he was an f b? I hm I dunno. I guess that calls into question what proof means, but I suppose, if that, if he were interrogated enough, you could find out one way or another there's a streak of insanity yeah. It is funny that we all watch politics as if the politicians mean it to be serious and then we debate it like they meant it to be serious. I'm way past that it's hard to debate things that people didn't mean to be serious, as if it were serious. I can't get past the fact that they didn't mean it when they say that if you didn't mean it when you said it, it's obvious didn't mean it. When you said I don't need to debate whether it's true or false, if you didn't mean it when you said it, and it's obvious,

Apps could prove it by going to trial. Now you couldn't really prove it prove it, because you can't prove a negative. You could simply show there's no evidence that baby and uh simulates yeah. So we do have videos now of the simulated three hundred dead per day, but put them in a pile. And today we didn't another red dilber, yes cheek cartoon and I dont know how many newspapers of cancelled me or were sensor this week, but things are going to get a lot dice here in the coming days. So I just wrote a serious that I don't know

If the newspapers will publish I'll give you a preview. Delvers life is going to mirror my own personal experience, so there's gonna be an opening for promotion and dilber, but will be one of the people considered in the bottles will tell me, is being considered but he's being considered along with Alice niles tina. The tec writer, who has no qualifications for the job opening day is the new employ, looks black but because he's a prank stir he identifies as white just to thwart the boss and a shook the intern. Now you may have noticed that each of those three characters have something extra going on.

So there either people of color or female and the way is being set up as a dilber will be known to all involved, including the other people were up for the job. Even they will know the billboard us and was qualified for this open, but you will not get the job, Oh, do you think I'm gonna get away with that did? Do you want beyond the here. The writing. Before I draw my reader to say I don't think I can find it quickly enough, but if I can.

On my little device here, I'll read you the ones that I think are going to get killed. Let's say moody, no problem I'll, find it in a minute deal: birds dailies is there. This is so hard to find things ever notice that and then they're not scans. In order on the phone, I showed my modified god. They're all they're all sorted in some random order that doesn't look like they can be resorted. Why is this so hard anyway? I guess I can't that the interface for dropbox is so bad that I can't even just like go in and see. I see my own files organized chronologically. It doesn't look like you can sort them there's no way that they didn't believe me that option. Can I really not sort them it'd be crazy.

Doesn't look like a kim daisy. Alright, sorry I mumbled and looked away from you for awhile, but I'll look at it on another computer and read it to the local people after we're done here with youtube and yes, it'll be a locals exclusive god. How dare you that's the punchline if an upcoming comic? How dare you alright? That's all for now youtube I'll talk to you tomorrow, locals stay on here with me.