Late, but only less than a minute, and not only on my late, but I'm almost prepared but voice again and we go this morning. Oh my goodness, Not only did I not oversleep, I am well rested, for the last several days have been trying this experiment. I dunno, have you ever, I'm gonna ask you have any of you ever tried this. This is something I'd heard about, but I'd. Never, actually they tried for last three days up and running this experiment as it's crazy and let me tell you what I've done.

For three days in a row, I got enough sleep. Have you ever tried that I've ever tried just getting enough sleep for several days? Neuro? Oh, my god, changes everything they just changes everything I didn't think it was possible now. The secret, of course, is to go to. Way earlier than you want to turns out. That's all secret just go to bed earlier, I assure you. Did you exercise and Hide yourself out, but that's why you're here you here for a little thing, called coffee was got homes The fires thing this arabin to anybody everywhere and, to take that up to another level, a level that nobody's ever seen before ever.

And all you need is a copper another glass at anchor trousers, Diana candy job or a flask of vessel of any kind fill it with you. if it liquid? I like coffee and join me now. Well the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine the other day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous edco time to savor savor savor good. Some of you are sipping. Without the savoring and That seems unacceptable. Well, saturday, night live is going into full throated marking of president Biden, yeah and This is mark any kind of action,

singing changing boy, I'll think so, but Are you fond of his mental acuity directly by showing clips of looking doddering and that you follow them? Getting us close to nuclear war? So there are still is still a little bit of a less age, Until rubbing, but they are definitely sansom negative things about Biden little back a loaded, Is it the where this thing in the world. the Biden has maybe pushed us close the nuclear war, but. I don't really spend much, I'm worried about it. Do you

How many of you are literally worried about nuclear war, reaching you, let's say affecting you somehow or any of you actually worried cause? I know some of your little bits know very little about me. Yeah she's jugglers, there's no there's no point to it. And although we imagine that putin maybe unstable. Nobody says he's crazy. Do they. I haven't heard anybody says you're, just mentally unstable or something so the reason, I don't see any scenario where he would launch a nuclear attack just elsie cause. I think he has enough conventional weapons to wipe out. You know the civilian infrastructure in ukraine. If he wants to do bad things is he's got other options that won't definitely kill. Him

Well, spent years out of live makes me think of p davidson, which basically. Think of Tom Brady and Jews, l, a boon dungeon kinchins euro Tom Brady inches l, whose last name is not terribly pronounced. People buy me right now, As bad as divorces do you think Tom Brady is the most worried about where this divorce out there, that he would be most worried that his extras l, Webster dating be davidson. I feel like that would be. The worst case scenario is like. Ok, a divorce is terrible.

But there is one thing worse than getting divorced, your ex dating p davidson's. Now yea would tell you that's no picnic but. Honestly I I worried about it when I got divorced like oh, my god, I hope pete davidson doesn't know, I'm getting doors. You know, I don't think I had to worry about it, but it's run through your mind. Goes through your mind, so I'm just saying goes through your mind. Well, do you want to deal with the biggest? and if you ve ever had lately, let let me just below your mind, are you ready now? I feel bad, because I I rented an opinion. I think it was the lawfare blog, but I may be giving the wrong credit here. I hope and there was an argument that

The russian the pipeline explosion was most likely accidental. What do you think they'll tell you the argument in a moment, but what was your first impression to that? most likely lacks accident right now. Your first thought is: there's no way that you can make that anybody can make that argument. Right. Am I right the you're sure you're sure I can't repeat in an argument that would change your mind right now and now for the biggest mind after you've had all week, I'm going to change your mind and make you

it was accidental. I read it a pity that this, as I did not think I could be convinced, but here's the argument number one is hard to keep a pipeline maintenance. Was it's hard to maintain is much easier. I learned its much easier to maintain a pipeline, that's actively flowing because of its actively flowing. Then everything they could get caught him there. There is also moving along basically nothing against clogged, but if you have a pipeline, that's not being used. It is also full of gas early. There are a number of things. They can go wrong, maintenance, wise and their catastrophic meaning that it gets plug. So if you-

I had to turn it back on again. It just wouldn't work cause. There are some hydrates right, the higher the the hydrates or something get plugged in there. So some of the kind of called the plug now. This is a well known phenomenon, so well known phenomenon, meaning that you turned off any pipeline of this type. It would get plugs guaranteed. I don't think there's any. She has a wooden plug up so that the first thing you can fact check is there any chance you wouldn't get plugged up, and I think the answer is no. It would always get plugged up and fairly soon. Like it wouldn't be a rare thing, you would be the most common thing that happened now. Here's the second part. How do you fix it if it gets put,

and you ever want to use it again in one imagines that russia would want to have that option. How would you unplug it. and the answer is you have to depressurizing very slowly over weeks over weeks. And if you want to do it safely, you have to depressurize it from both sides, so that would mean the german side as well as the russian side. Here's the hypothesis, the hypothesis, is, you, don't want to add heat to it. I think that blew up a pipe.

Once when they drive to the hypothesis is that russia may have wanted to keep it. Keep the option of the pipeline open and may have tried to depressurize it from one side and if they tried to depressurize it from one side, they probably were doing both of them around the same time and and they may have just blown both- Now, here the things you need to fact to find out, if this is true. Ro on what are the odds that it will blow up in multiple places around the same time? Well, let me reverse the question The blast were seventeen hours apart, who, would intentionally do it. Seventeen our gap between

there are between their attacks because after the first one blew up, people would be looking for the second one. There will be more scrutiny you wouldn't put a seventy in our delay between two attacks. Would you Like militarily, that wouldn't make sense, because the odds of you finding the second one would be higher. That's one argument: But a seventy there were gap would actually explain and maintenance of maintenance fix, does a moment working at the same time. And then, whatever whatever probably found that one might have been common to all of them. So maybe it was just a different soul when they exploded. but the apparently russian maintenance is famously not thorough. So what do you think of that?

What would you say that passes? Here's what I would do, I'm not sold on the hypothesis. But it would explain a lot wouldn't it will explain a lot. And even the timing of it doesn't really is not a coincidence. Said to yourself. What is what are the odds there were blow up at the same? The war is over and the answer is very high because s when it was turned off It was the turning off the main it likely to blow up and it was turned off because of the war, at the moment they turned it off the blowing up we're high. So that's the faster the moment was turned off, given that they couldn't do the kind of maintenance that they want to do on both ends. They can only do one and maintenance, presumably does. Maybe germany was in court.

But the odds were blowing up or high. Not low. Interesting. Is that now that would that do to your brain? Does yesterday that that was quite and spinner to me, like all really why. Why did you take me this long to learn that once its turned off the odds of blowing up our high. I just as in the eyes were very loud in you: don't don't you think that the news should have given you this one fact and by the way, I'm not sure that what I told you to write a letter from one source. But don't you want to know this? One question: if that kind of pipelines is turned off and not meticulously maintained? What are the odds of blowing up within less than six months

If the, if the answer is every experts says the odds are pretty high, then I would say that's what happened. who would agree with me that if we could get an answer to this and, of course, our new sources, our new sources are useless. This isn't this the one and only question what were the odds of that happening? Naturally, I've never seen. Anybody s question on the news of you: Have you ever seen a pipeline maintenance person on the news answer? The question could this the blown up on his own if it were closed down for gas and poorly maintained. Am I wrong that as the central question and you ve never, but even ask it or or try to answer you I've done. Before that. I've speculated that the I also value that we can do here is to

Tell our media what they're not telling us that we need to know because the stuff they don't tell you. Totally influences what you think about the story and that's the biggest question he's telling us the answer to the biggest question. And by the way, how hard would it be to get that answer? All you have to do It is good at any expert who does this kind of work? There must be plenty of americans who have this expert. is just put him on the air and say: what do you think? Could this have blown up on his own, feel like the news is so in the bag for the government that maybe the government wants the but tat it was blown up by a military operation. I think they want that out there, because did he knows that here, baby Brennan did something

for the country, I think blaming russia right away was smart propaganda, even if they thought it was accidental, because maybe they do it could be that america, It was. It was accidental or doesn't know why it blew up. So the first thing you should do is just go out and blame russia. She can get it out there first, in which case I would have been a good play, miller, early speaking are. I have to say that the conservatives are really the problem for fixing both fled. Internal, oh and education, and here's why, Because in both cases can servers, insisted that the slow is readily available. If we would just take it, but it's not even a possible solution in both cases so conservatives would say, whilst the sentinels coming from mexico, which it is

Build that wall get your border security, tighten problem solved, so as long as concerns, think there is a solution that we need to look raised any new solution. There is one built all accept that The book the war would only has gaps in this big between the slats. And the total amount offensive hollow, take two killer but in your city, would be held in your hand. So are you it was handed added to somebody on the other side of the wall. They bob if you are I'll, give you one hundred thousand dollars if you'll take us a little water fentanyl and give it to my friend across the street, there's nothing you can do to stop the shipment of fentanyl Thus, completely now on the table, but cancer made the argument about the wall, so As long as your arguing about the wall-

georgie about the about the wall, you're, not doing anything preventable If you can say you are then politically I guess you're done right. Politically, we said we're building wall, but those democratic more letter. So I guess there's no you knew about fundamental sub increases, penalties which big deal. If there were serious about sentinel there would be negotiating with the cartels. We would ask them for an ambassador and we would set them down with some immunity so that there they can actually talk to us and we used to say you've crossed the line and we're just we're just going to pave your whole fucking country, or at least the cartel parts, not not the civilian parts. we'll take out the cartel completely militarily, with no limitations on our actions unless you stopped sentinel right now,.

We should always give them they offer because they are a business. Will It's about paypal and a little while. Why did people do it or did it reverse? This policy will talk about that cause because because it was a business decision, it was just the business Decision we need to give the cartels a business decisions. Here's your decision you play cat and mouse with you with. You know the old crimes that you're doing, but if you send one more box of fentanyl our way, the entire military of the united states is going to hunt you down and kill every one of you. you're a business. What do you do? I would think any business would take us seriously and say our aid from profit and loss perspective. We should focus on these other things that don't get the entire military in our pants.

we're not negotiating with the cartels directly top of government to top of government, meaning the cartel governments themselves were not serious. How can you be serious when, having haven't conversations, I mean really does outlook serious? Do you The other thing that I would definitely look at is purified alternatives. I dont know if anybody trailing that in a way that is stupid, the the way san francisco did, it, I think, was just poorly implemented. Maybe it wasn't thought out, but I think there's something to separating people and letting them have the drugs that they want safely. About teaching kids not to use drugs well, we know that that doesn't work,

as I say, there's that's another perfect example of why the conservatives are the problem, because conservatives believes that the that you could teach people not to do drugs and that you could build a wall. I guarantee you, those are the two worst approaches. So if you focus on them you're the problems, you think you might be part of the solution because you think those be. Good things to do but they're not you need to catch up. You need to up your knowledge about the problem. If you get your knowledge about the problem up to a high level, then you can be part of the productive conversations. But if you're just saying wall and teach you not to do drugs you're, not part of anything, though those are not even worth talking about, they don't have any any potential at all, just say no didn't work!

So so that bridge two crimea. There was attacked by the ukrainians, we assume the russian say it's already opens bud. I don't know how open it is. I I would think that if you reduce the effectiveness of the bridge by forty percent, that's gonna be a pretty big deal right if it's the mary transportation thing, but it also tells me that the bridge is reachable. Here's a question I have Why did the russians? Why were they so confident they could protect their bridge? there's something I don't understand. You Neither the united states doesn't have Anything that

fly or float to that bridge from some ukrainian asset. there's nothing, there's nothing. The united states has that we could sell to ukraine's that we'll get to that bridge. I I feel like there would be like ten ways to do it right and I guess a thing I don't know is how can russia guard the entire perimeter that you need to guard? I mean how much somebody said it was an hour see drone both today by here that there was a drone that one hundred and My question: how can you possibly check every boat there goes under their? How can you check every car? There goes over.

I wasn't a suicide attack or some kind of drones situation. Who is tell you about the war to have to deal with another one of you at the scares me. I will take a pause for the new. People knew people when we talk about ukraine here, the rules we I know that all of the information that ukraine is probably bullshit. We all know. Ukraine is huge, liars, khazar, We all know rush hour, huge liars because russia, they don't need arises, We all know our government is a huge liar. Are you ok, can you deal with that? The fact that we don't know any of this is accurate, so

with the ground rules. If you asked me about my the quality of my sources, I will simply remind you that so far you should all be fucking listening to me, because I'm the only one who's been right about ukraine consistently since russia across the border. I was deeply wrong about them crossing the border. But since then I ve been the most right. Literally the only person who said I think you paint and when this because an american weaponry, oh maybe the other sources should listen to me for a while, but but don't be surprised if one hundred percent of any of the information we see is false? That should be your baseline expectations that the knowledge is not not reliable. Alright,.

so I think that bridge is going to get hit again, because I can't imagine that it's not vulnerable. I just can't imagine we can't get to it somehow and here's the good news. You know I never would have seen this happening, but it actually happened. Black lives matter brought the country together there were actually all on the same page with that. Here's, what I mean. Be allowed those meanings, some people here say: oh the organization I dont like that organization because I think they're corrupt. And other people your be alarmed and they say I was to see. I did what I like the idea. So therefore I like it. I think we have reached the point where there's nobody, black or white. Who believes that the organization was valid. That.

all black and all white citizens who are paying attention now understand that the leaders of the organization were corrupt. so we gotta came together. Secondly, so that's it that's the the political part. I think we all agree politically. It was a corrupt organization, but then, let's talk about the philosophy The black lives matter. I've literally never heard anybody disagreeably have you, so they are all the same page. Of course, black lives matter as yea says, is obvious So weirdly we ended up on the same page. The organization was corrupt, idea of is fine. If you take the political point, let's go for something we all came to, yeah I mean see happening a totally surprised, I can. I can wear the black lives matter, shirt. Completely without any sense of

your sarcasm writhing, because I can completely embrace the idea, because now that political parties or a script em, but let's talk about so do you think you should go twenty four hours without causing trouble? Well, apparently, not So yesterday or last night I guess he got restricted or some kind of throttling going on in instagram because he says a message to diddy or somebody, and I'm quoting, and I don't know what this means, because this is what ye said that he was going to go def con three on jewish people tomorrow, but that he can't be anti.

because he's black and black people are jewish. Now, let me often I have to interpret things for you. Good sundays, you'll see things in the news and then you away from you to to explain to you like white, all makes sense, and maybe you're missing the point, and then maybe it is. The context is misinterpreted. So let me explain to you: why does nobody also do it for you? Let me explain to you What do you mean when he says he's? Gonna go death country and all jewish people and black people or jewish? So he can't be. symmetric? What that means is I have no idea. I don't even have a good guess, I hope it doesn't mean what it looks like can we agree on this ray that I hope he doesn't mean exam.

What looks like because it exists, We want a looks like doesn't look, good, doesn't look good, but we're under the forty eight hour rule. Are we not? We're under the forty eight hour rule, which we seek to clarify. and should he clarify the in a way where I can say: oh, okay, that's why you doing then it'll be fine. If he doesn't clarify well, I guess she you will get to make our own decisions. I think he will yeah. I mean it. Defcon three is for readiness not as well come on. That's another distinction that matters that deaf country is full readiness, not an attack. I mean I didn't think he was going to start rounding up

people and putting in camps where we can speculate what it means we can speculate. It could. Could be exactly what it looks like, but let's just weight was wincey. I would say I worry about with yea. Is that once you guess some traction on something, That doesn't seem like there's there's no such thing as too far. which is also why we like him right, is unwilling to be bound by other people's requirements of where you know that stay in laid

I mean he may have left the ultimate laid this one. He may be testing how far we can go so we'll find out the interesting either way. I saw what I said that we have all come together. over the bill. I'm stuff, I also tweeted yo. Can we fix educational? Because if we can agree that view black lives better, maybe that's like a little stepping stone towards working together, I'm just something small to get some, maybe some confidence that we, work together. We meaning the left and the right and fixed schools, Those are carbon from where user Jeremy Kaufmann, who

rather provocatively there. He says that either outcomes he took no school grades and the differences between black Why else comes, he says. Either outcomes differ on average by race public school teachers are the most raises people in the country, so he believes right to exploit. for why they showed some data. I don't know how credible data is It is suggested that poor white kids do about the same as rich white kids in school. Do you believe that first of all, is that even true do you think poor white kids do roughly this and the essays just on the essays? Do you think they do roughly that doesn't. all right, but but whether that's right or not, my point is gonna. Be slightly off that my point is us, How do you separate the school?

it's the way they are now from culture and I'll give you a specific example. I came from a small town where which was your lower income kind of a place: very small town, two thousand people in my town, forty people in my graduating class, small town, so my yo edge, the the education that I got from this small town was not the greatest in the world, but I got to college. Now, when I was born practically from the time I could understand language. My mother was telling me that I was going to go to college no matter what and that that would be my ticket to a good life and also that, if I got rich I'd, give her some money I'd help her out, because she always wanted to be rich but didn't have the option. So she thought well, I'm going to make sure your kids go to college and if one of you makes it maybe you'll share,

which I ended up doing actual so so let me ask you this. Do you think being told? you're gonna, go to college and succeed from birth made a difference in my path. Of course it did, Of course I didn't even know those anything else to do. I didn't have a thing fail. There was one of the options for once the thought about not going to college now. Once I don't, I think I ever made a serious thought that I would well maybe not going college now. Once now take my mother, And proper into the

inner city yeah worst place, you could be a maker or a black mother. Instead of my mother and she's got a black kid and cheeses from birth you're going to college, but my school is terrible and my you know the people are bad, but you're going to college. Does it work, I say? No, I say it wouldn't work so say it wouldn't work. You know why, because my mother's influence of the environment, it was enough to overcome my environment. Not really a college bound community, but nobody was. Nobody in my town emerson. Maybe you should go to college. Maybe you should do these drugs instead, you maybe you should join my gangs that are going to call. There was no counter

narrative. So, even though the narrative that my mother gave me might have been somewhat rare within my town There was nobody on the other side Why I clean highway? To me I mean by highway was greased, although I was like yours. here's your path, sold downhill I think you have to do, is get on. It is like hundred miles of stray? I way so downhill just be on it, and you will succeed. And so my mother told me where the road was everyone in my town agreed, everybody knows no exceptions and they said it. Mrs schreyer, everybody rose right here, everybody or just get on. Road and then I walked over an I got on the road and then my town pushed me because they did they give me a little boost

I I rode down the road for one hundred miles just life. They said exactly like. They said it would work and it worked. I believe if you took the same mentality and moved so the inner city, it wouldn't work at all. Do you know why? Because, as soon as the kid guess, the school is going to get a counter narrative, oh, were you trying to act white, oh, what a nerd. Shit. You should join this group. Girls, don't like you, you're, never gonna get laid if you act like that. So If you say to me, the black americans have done worse there are schools and white americans as similar incomes. I say to you, but now similar culture. If you give them similar culture, will then you ve got a test. Then you can find their way you're dealing, but we don't have anything like that. There's there's no way to know

If ever the nigerian immigrants earn more than people born in this country zone, but ever told you That's one of those easier: you go what if he had any racial, lay bias in you, and you hear that statistic you go way what you say Nigerian immigrants make more, on average than the average american, why? Presumably Because they don't have a cultural speed up my gas and unjust guessing is that they might have. Maybe the people themselves like Come over here are people of had education as a priority and dynamic, Italian wasn't good idea, probably just guessing.

A lot of them are doctors and engineers, which is how they can get you in the first place. When so. I would say that the the big saying that we need to fix education is way for it separating culture from education boom. You need to do the education in a way that it is somehow insulated from the negative effects of people who who just are not on the right path and there's no way to do that with the current school system. so you're. Your options are all your home schooling, good luck with that, if you ve got low income or options vouchers, whatever so probably creating a competitive competitive since

The main thing you know what I'd also like to see somebody had this idea them I wish I could. I wish I could give credit, but the idea look like that Instead of giving somebody a lesser voucher or something to go to school, where they lived, you give them a scholarship to move. Think about. so you treat to tree education as relocation, as I've heard if we don't have an education problem, we have a relocation problem, because if you took the kids who are clustered in the bad culture- and you could pick them out and put them individually into stronger cultures in theory, the stronger culture would start to work on. The

it's and do it's thing so it could be that relocation is what education requires. Scott needs to read the bell curve. I know all about that. I all about them. Here's my! my argument is that that's a red herring Wouldn't matter what the science says that our Reckon responsibilities to give everybody in their best shot and that's it. And when arguing everybody there Bagshot not even close, so until you give it until you even close to giving everybody their best shot. I hear your argument, but I just don't think it's relevant to the biggest issues. And I would argue this also for the years my argument against the bell curve, so the belcour vacation up aware

a racially, let's say racially provocative theory about differences, nyc use among races, but here's what's here and it was the races, get wrong every time because people want like take that is you're. An explanation of everything we say here is what's wrong with that. Everybody who says the way people are smarter because way. People like invented a bunch of stuff. How much did you invent if you're awake

it doesn't really matter? If there's some portion of your of your group that you identify with that killed it? If it's not you that does the fact that Ben franklin invented stuff. How does that help me? I mean it helps us all as we have inventions but like once, I got to do with me. It kind of doesn't matter that there are different. Is among people because it's sort of bumpy differences and I'm not I'm not one of those. I'm not einstein. doesn't matter their eyes day was smarter than just about everybody, and he was also whiten if you want to throw in jewish in german or what whatever you're promoting today doesn't matter. Cause you're, not you're, not einstein is just a different person.

I don't know how I can take credit for that for some completely different person. I guess I canceled yet still on here. By the way, you do need some kind of change that removes the modernization for awhile. Allegedly I can monetize is still, but their removes the the interface for doing that six by today, but always wonder yesterday, that was aimed at me or some kind of a bigger they do we already, about paypal they think about it. Did I talk about people yet so yesterday, you know that story As the people had some upcoming away, which, in their user agreement there I have allowed you to would have allowed paypal.

fine, this users, twenty five hundred dollars for spreading this information for spreading misinformation, now they ve already. They ve already said that that was a mistake and- that language was not intended to be there and they've already reversed it. Now a lot of people cancelled in the meantime, and I tweeted that you know seriously need to cancel your account if that's real But even if even after they said it wasn't real, allegedly a lot of people still cancelled because it did show their intentions of fuel, Can I give you a dilber lesson. Oh, I see here and they to give you a dilber lesson. You ready. if you do not have experience with big corporations. What is the most

as a good thing, you assume doing not assume, then the big corporation europe. multiple lawyers and multiple manager, two reviewed all this and said? Yes, how many would agree with that that it must have been intense because there's no way there were a bunch of people sought and said. Yes, we want them. Yes, yes, everybody who says? Yes is wrong right. All of you think the multiple. Cole slaw their language you're all wrong. now now saying I know happened, I'm so I know how big companies work Let me tell you I used to have that job. If you didn't work that exact job. Of being the one who reviewed the lawyers language you dont know how this works. Let me explain it to you one lawyer and only one,

exactly one lawyer is the job of writing up the new terms one lawyer throws them everything they can think of, because as you do it you throw everything just in case and you know that nobody's gonna read it typically nobody's gonna, really That's why you're software agreements, the shrink, grech agreements with the open software those agreements say stuff like will take your first born child will bake. You change your name to microsoft, will will adopt your cat and take it from you re just crazy shit. all got approved, and we also so in that context, where lawyers always put crazy shit in their in their boilerplate.

One lawyer put crazy shit in it and it was really long and then it was given to somebody for approval, probably one person that was probably exactly one person who had to approve it more than one person might have seen it, but only one person had to approve it. I would like to give you now my: of me when I had that job because they used to be my job to approve it. I'd look at the lawyers boilerplate for agreements. I was negotiated for corporations. and then the lawyer would give it to me and then I look at it, and I would if it were ok and if it and if it were ok, I tell my boss in my boss- wouldn't read it. Of course this was my job than the boss. Would you say what And here is me looking at the lawyers boilerplate, may I give you my impression of me.

Proving my lawyers boilerplate sure. That's probably weapons. If you ve been there, you know how I really works right now, israeli, by whose bending the job to confirm to me. That's our really works. One lawyer just put everything in their no matter how ridiculous it sounded and one person whose job was to apply I really do you think I read everything my lawyers gave me to approve no way your brain would explode

Do you think I read everything my lawyer gives me to sign today. Nope. Do you think I check my taxes when my accountant gives me my taxes? This is the slick. Do you think I'd check it? Well? The answer is I do I actually do, because I have lots of experience. With financial, stuff and documents, so I actually do flip through it.

I found errors, not big ones, but I found things that I thought a you know. This should have been a little different now, I'm I'm unique because I've done that for a living. So I can look at my taxes and I know what I'm looking at, but generally speaking, most of the legal agreements that I signed I haven't read, I have not read: did you read your prenup? Yes yeah. The print I read. I read the freed up all the way through. That would be the exception, but certainly like boiler playthings see. A pre is not a a boilerplate. Yes to make a distinction between agreements. There are specific and agreements that are soaring generic. The pay pal thing was a generic boiler playthings, that's the

The way I explained is the way that works. People don't really read them, but if you're doing a real agreement for like a specific thing, yeah people read that I would definitely read that There's no excuse for including this language. No, excuse from a management perspective, but you have to understand that the lawyer was just doing the job of a lawyer. The lawyer was it gives their company every option just in case just in case There are some nazi using paypal, they Reveals a well, we can't do you for being a nazi, but you spread some misinformation, so we can get you. It was just to give em options. I guess say it was the best lawyering in the world, but it was.

Outside the realm of normal lawyering whispered, a normal actually management must take responsibility. Yes, they must, and they did, they did Responsibility actually they they said it was a mistake. So there's that you know do you know what they didn't say. We will never do that. That's what they didn't say. Here's here's, how the the apology should have worked had they done the steve jobs. Ups battered much better, the steve jobs pattern would go on like this. First, you acknowledged the harm. Oh we're, sorry, we didn't mean to cause this trouble. So first you acknowledge that you, her people, We didn't mean to damage your trust. Sorry about that. Next,

You do, is you say, you're going to fix it, that you know what the problem is you're going to fix it, but here's the thing that they did that they said we ve already faced. It bears the thing they got wrong. They should have come out and said we will never do that. We will never get you off the service for misinformation on another platform if they go. Wait extra and maybe even say we reprimanded the lawyer or or somebody get fired Suddenly fired whoever wrote that, even if they didn't I wanna go a long way to think about how you with think of the story. If you're they fired that person the minute the murder they found out, you were here. Definitely because then you say: ok management is definitely not on that page, but there was no one employee.

But as soon as banishment just says: oh, we changed. We changed the language because we got caught than it looks like it was management decision business. So that was a mistake. if they believe they would never do that they should say is our intention. We would never do that. So many of you ve already cancelled paypal. I think they. I think they noticed. It definitely noticed Laurie three other story: I forgot today. Nothing is happening.

Oh of all, says: Putin would use a tactical nuke if he was close to being replaced and the us thinks they can well. I don't know that the? U s is going to try to replace Putin, because that seems dicey, minute rushes going to have to do what russia does and I do think that your novel has to be taken seriously anytime. He says anything

but the odds, are still overwhelmingly in favor of no nuclear holocaust and it didn't see the masters kelly debate, game theory said it was reasonable yeah. I I agree that if we were trying to replace putin that a tactical nuke might it might shake the box, I don't think it would be his best play alright florida surgeon,

after all. What's a tweet removal, I don't know about that. Does anyone know how important feels well born just turn? Seventy services, birth.

so I guess the the crimea bridge got attacked on Putin's birthday. Do you think that was a coincidence? Was it a coincidence? They attacked the bridge, which apparently had great symbolic importance of his birthday coincidence, or no, I say not a coincidence. Not a coincidence, cause it's personal and the the the attack on his birthday does suggest a specific person who was behind it, but I would only be speculating, I don't think so, but maybe alright, I who gains from the attack on the bridge, ukraine. What do you mean who gains from an attack on the bridge? Oh yeah, let's talk about the veneman connection. Alright, let me take you back to trump's perfect phone call with Alinsky.

And Alexander Vinland. Do you remember the story that he that ukraine asked alexander veneman an american to be there ahead of defense right? Can you do fact check me on that veneman an american was offered by ukraine, a colonel to be their head of their entire military, was he not now? He didn't take that, of course, but imagine if he had just imagined this. If veneman had taken the job number one would he have done so well, because ukraine is over yeah, it was overcompensating, but here's. The other thing. Have you not been wondering.

Who is advising by every about wondering who is it? Who is behind the curtain? Who is the most influential person on ukraine within the Biden administration? I feel like his venom. a there's something about women that I dont quite understand, which is, I did and american colonel even get the offer to be the head of their entire military.

How is that even a thing and what it? What what it makes me wonder, is if veneman doesn't have more game than we know. In other words, was he effective enough that the ukrainians actually knew that he would be a good to have as their military? I mean, why would even make that offer? Could it be because they knew veneman was so connected to the Biden administration, somehow that he could get more funding and more americans support, so maybe having vinland was really just a way to you have more fundraising guarantee from america? Maybe, but something tells me that vinland has more to do with this whole story than we fully know.

Yeah baby, so I dunno could be alright yeah. I don't. I don't see in Vinland that whole head of the army leadership capability, but. I there's somebody advising on ukraine and he probably knows more about them than most people. Oh some recent follow the money and I want to remind I always tell you, the follow the money works even when it shouldn't, and I have a different way to explain that, because that's not convincing persuasive, So what I mean by that is that sometimes is obvious. We follow the money means like oh the people who would make the most profit seem to be in favour of this. So obviously this because of the prophet

that is obvious, but then there are other times when there are clearly doesn't seem to be any monetary impact and then, by coincidence, Reality will still follow the path where somebody made a profit. And you said yourself well, that was probably just a coincidence. Here's my new theory follow the money as a cheap code for understanding where the simulation is gonna go, but not necessarily because of it see. That's what about it. If you think that you can follow the money, because it's just a cause and effect.

maybe and most of the time it is. But what? If it's also a cheat code that just tells you what's going to happen even when you can't see the cause and effect where money's david, the part of the part of it, but money's always part of it. There's nothing big that happens that doesn't have some monetary impact on somebody. So try this just for a fun experiment. So this is an experiment to see if we're in a simulation. Every time you have to predict something figure out where the

the situation would flow and then make your protection based on the money. Even if you're pretty sure. That's not why anybody is making the decision and see how often you're right so again is not because of cause and effect money causes things, although it usually does, but even when you can see the cause and effect of money will still predict its a cheek owed. Maybe it looks that way, so just keep an eye out for that. That's what makes economics five year I'd exactly! I do you know much about the current Alex jones case. I don't I do not follow the fuel than the other way to do it. So, as I said yesterday that energy here,

Energy availability and whether you are a buyer or seller,. The turbans, your economics, your economics, determines your homeland security. If he just follow the energy, it would explain everything over time. Probably more than even money is money and energy, and that being the same thing, yeah. You're fungible does offer. Now we did covered paypal, you missed it. I'm gonna say goodbye to you to flare and specifying.