The find me yup, we have zero yea one person watching on youtube. That's all I need. I only did one person, that's all. Oh, we got five. Alright, there are five as well. Those youtube people, they're resourceful years, so revert resourceful their color. Their streaming back in one of them is yea. You think, if I were you, I would be watching my. I would be watching this today. Alright, look at you, they are almost back in. So I'm going to talk about a few things here, while they're coming back in, I saw a I've. I've heard this story before, but I want to see how many of you fit into this category. Did you know that not everybody has a voice

in their head, that's themselves having a conversation with yourself, apparently something like half or seventy. Five percent of the public doesn't have a voice in their head. So I need to ask you how many of you hear a voice in your head all the time I mean I do. I continually have an actual conversation going in my head is, but how many people don't? Why am I only saying? Yes, I do I've seen very few knows that doesn't make sense. Does it I feel, like everybody would say yes to that question, but yet the research acts like it's mostly no or,

I know yeah. Maybe we should just call bullshit on that. I'm not sure. That's even true is it because I don't know how you'd not have a voice in your head now I I do know that it is a thing. So let me let me be clear, I'm pretty sure it's a real thing that some people don't hear a voice, but what I don't believe is as common yeah. I don't believe it's common by the way, if anybody's watching on locals, because the youtube feed died and youtube is back up. I just had to fire up a separate feed, so is working method, which is something wrong with it initially, so you can see that other one, and I always appreciate that you come in.

There are over six hundred people waiting on the old like what am I going to do about that? There's nothing. I can do about that right. I can't kill the old leg cause. I've got a I've, got a new one, that's running and it wasn't responsive. When I click on very well, I guess I'll have to find it later. I think they'll figure out in five minutes that that's not working. I I can't give you a redo of the sip, because that would be traveling back in time, but I'll give, that I'll give you an interim set alright, so I'm going to call bullshit on this whole half of the people care here, an internal voice in their head. I don't think that's thing. Now let me tell you about a story this in the wall street journal love story, a bidding

is, is written by a roland, fryer who's, a professor of economics at harvard, so the two things you need to know about him is: he is a professor of economics at harvard, then. The second thing you need to know about him because it's the context of the story, The other black grandmother I dont know if his parents were black, but he seems to be identifying with the black experience at least And in his article he talks about was studying for economics, obviously at a top level education, because whose armoured and

and he was doing research to find out how much discrimination and bigotry was behind the differences in salaries. What do you think you found out when he kept looking for the reason that there is a difference in salaries? It was completely explained by skill level. Apparently, the free market did exactly what you expected and in the world there is no indication of any racism whatsoever. The people had the same skills and the same bay. Very ad, and his article to his credit is article- was about how he was blinded by confirmation by us, and they could even see his own numbers I use looking at his own data. Be was not believing it because his grandmother had primed him that this racism is everywhere all the time.

He gave the story of his grandmother once it was some cashier who headed to their money without wanting to touch her and the grandmother interpreted that as the cashier was such a racist, she didn't want to have accidental, like contact with a black person. That was how the grandmother interpreted it and then the grandson wasn't so sure he was like. I think. Maybe she had a cold that she didn't want to give you or germs So basically, they had two completely different worlds, based on what you are prime to believe. So, even with that little bit priming MR friar.

Go all the way to you know to adulthood and he's still still thought that the data would would agree with. You know his interpretation of the world and it didn't now. Here's here's the important part of the story. Most of you knew that right is there. Anybody who didn't know that the free market does make salaries basically equal. I know it I bet that everyone will you do it. Here's was interesting somebody you identifies as black. I believe I don't wanna over characterizes, but that seems how we presented himself, He has got a major opinion piece in the wall street journal. He has got an economics degree from harvard ob, sorry duh. I am completely mischaracterizing. He was a professor of economics at harvard that's better than having

can I was degree our I don't worry, gathers degree, but if you prefer, sir of economics at harvard, thus even higher than being a student of economics. So this is up. You seriously knows what he's talking about and you got you got this opinion piece in the wall street journal in one of the big papers of record, and it looks like just a good opinion like I don't think anybody is going to attack him. I don't think the newspaper will be forced to retract it. I feel I feel like society is reached the point where this opinion is now acceptable. What do you think

because it now agrees with observation, the data and the observation now aligned for at least some of the people in the world. To me, this data exactly batches everything I have observed in to me. I've never seen I've never observed directly and salary. Difference for people have different with similar skills. Male male female black white I've just never seen so so maybe the world is getting passive

I will say, however, that this doesn't help with the real source of of racial inequality, which is the schools cause by the time you're an adult all the damage is done, isn't it you know if you got a bad lower education, you don't have the choice of having equal skills of equal pay. It's just not an option because you didn't get the the same, the same boost when you were a kid, so we still have to fix that. About that. Mr friar would agree with that. Here's some good news. The federal fcc is gonna ban new telecom and surveillance equipment made by chinese company. and so they don't wanna, have chinese surveys. scandals in american places guys are worried that the chinese will? Maybe you

possibly use those cameras to spy on americans or something as or anything missing in this story, something maybe they overlooked a little bit, maybe some related kind of story while number, while the you know trump tried to do this and gossip resistance, but number two. tik tok is like a gazillion cameras that are literally in citizens pockets. How do you say these other companies or the risk of not take back? They talk literally as

camera in every fold is looking at you and listening to you making decisions and influence of you. This is even close. The fact that we can ban these companies I've never even heard Of- and it's a good idea and I'm solidly in favor of banning them, but take docs, that's okay! I just it's absurd. It's absurd, but good job. I would say from all the way back to the trump administration and they'll, give by the administration credit for finishing the job and and blocking these companies

I have to do. Tiktok people I've seen a fairly somebody asked mosque if he gets is that where it s bad, the apple and Google AB stores woody build a zone phone They said yes, there's a sort of as a sort of threats, slash bluff the only elon musk and make try to think of one other person in the world? Who could tell you those things? Don't work out, he'll make his own smartphone and you would believe it. Jeff Bezos tried it that didn't work out, but do you believe that Jeff Bezos could make a real competitive phone? Well, I dunno he is very capable, but when do you trust, elon musk, to make a smartphone

In a way, you wouldn't necessarily trust everybody else, and what am I wrong? I can't think of anybody. Who'd be more ideally suited for making a smartphone because he could pair it with neural link and he could pair it with his cars and he could pair it with his his satellites. And here's otherwise elon musk could do if he had a smartphone and satellites is less a smartphone goes through satellites. Just think about this sunday. You love mass. Could make a smartphone. That's the only one that can make a long distance call to mars. That's like

real? There is real if he makes the phone. Am I wrong there there's nothing technologically, there would stop you from making the phone call the mars, except the time lag right. Am I right, yeah and so you'd say. How are you and yeah you'd have to wait half an hour for a response, but you could sort of make a phone call. The mars, like technologically that's within the realm of ordinary engineering, so a period people say, there's a twenty twenty two minute time lag, but but if you send a voice message, a hope, your trip to mars was good. You know, let me know you made it. Okay, twenty minutes later a ring yeah made it. Okay. Is that oh and you could definitely text you- can text mars how you do how's the how's. It feel up there pretty good twenty minutes later

Very jerry jones, have, I ever told you: the famous people have a history of being famous ever since they were kids, there are some people Who seemed to be around big events like all of their life, like famously bill Clinton, that John F Kennedy when plan was again I don't feel like these are accidents. I feel, like famous people, keep having famous experiences just over and over. I'm so jerry jones. It turns out not to his credit. when he was fifteen years old was one of the white men or boys. I guess, Who blocked the the north little room

high school argues in arkansas sixty five years ago, blocked it to prevent integration in the school. So basically he was an overt racist. Is participating in an overtly racist act? There was just overtly racist is one of the most famous things. That's happened in the united states. What are the odds that one of those people was going to be jerry jones or would go on to be? You know somebody who's a the carbonate, but when he was challenged about, I guess the photo of him there, serviced, he has mentioned it before him. He never budget, which is a good move and I was interested in the way because he's a very high functioning, successful entrepreneur right so he's somebody. You expect to build a handle. Something well.

and I just tell you how he did his lip, you can judge whether the well, firstly didn't defended. You said the gaza was sixty five years ago. Now, that's good framing So the first thing he says is gotcha sixty five years ago, so that that was the acts that that was the best way to start the conversation yelled out those what sixty. five years ago because as soon as you hear that you get a load of more flexible and then he goes on to say that. Really reminds us that we have come a long way, something like that and I thought well. I was pretty good cause he's living that that was not the way to and that we've come a long way and he's glad that we have. Is now running away from the fact that sixty five years ago he was like in which,

some weird level. I appreciated. I don't know why I mean I'm not agreeing with the fifty year old kid. I, though I appreciate he just owned it. He just owned it yup. I did that wish. I, that now you stop short of saying I'm sorry. I wish I hadn't done it, but it was their likely the way that he dealt with it. The implication was that was some other guy. I'm not. I don't even need to talk about it and I do have very much on board with not having to explain what you did when you were fifteen. I couldn't do it. Could you could you. then you're fifteen year old self. I couldn't do it, but I'll tell you the way. I see it the way I would have handled it. I don't know if it's better.

But let's say let's say I got accused of some heinous activity when I was fifteen and then then somebody says explain it today: here's how I would explain it. You know I don't like that guy either that that fifteen year old, who did that thing? I I hate that guy. That said, I agree with you yeah. I don't like him any more than you do, but I'm not going to defend. I'm not good, not going to defend somebody, I'm not I'll defend who I am today. But if you want me to defend my- fifteen year old self. Now, I'm on your side, I don't like that guy and I would go further and hears thy ground. Here's a high ground that you say that in my view- and this is my actual view- so this is not. This is not like we're sophistry. This is my all of you that a life well lived is we were

start very imperfect and you try to improve and that you do the best you can to improve over the arc of your life, and I would say, we all started from the low place you ve got. A picture of mice might starting place. The only thing I when defenders, where I went, I'm not gonna, defend where I started and I'm not going to ask you to defend where you started either. I will ask you to defend how you doing how you doing. Are you improve it? Did you learn anything Are you the same person? You are when you are fifty, I hope not, but I hate you for who you were when you were fifteen, I'm not going to apologize for it, I'm not going to explain it, I'm just gonna say that was a different person same as you are a different person. When you were fifteen, we don't need to explain that person. We are supposed to be better than that person. Now am I while let you decide, but that's the only thing I'll defend

so I am now and that's the only joy stared I hold you to see. This helps to do to make sure they are not a hypocrite. That's a stand around hold you to unlock a blame you for anything. You did when you are fifty so, but is interesting, and I do think this. I think the jerry Jos story, Is more positive than negative because it shows the evolution of thought, it shows the evolution of america, you see it and one person. And I have no no reason to believe that he thinks the same as he did back then So absolutely yeah, I've said long ago that the Democrats really the party of women,

I'm seeing more people coming round to this point of view, because it is so obvious at this point and I saw a tweet by jason, the jews. the democratic party, is america's ex wife. The democratic party is America's ex wife. Have you ever have ever more perfect summary. Now, here's what I believe have I ever told you that everything is about procreation, of course, everything you do with it. The clothes you choose to put on the morning how much you eat whether you exercise that job You took where you live. All of your decisions are based on your your procreation instinct right everything from sex to success to just

it'd be like it's all about procreation. Now you don't think of it. That way, because you're going through your life, saying oh I'm just your rearing, in my garage, but somehow it all it all ties back to them. It makes sense that if there were ever two parties see if see. If you follow me on this, I may be going too far. I Here's my overall thought: if ever there was a situation with two parties, the most predictable thing happen is one of them would become the woman party and one would become the man party.

And that whenever you have a civilization with two main parties, that's the most likely thing that will happen cause our most basic instinct is procreation, and the male and female strategies for procreation are different, so that should cause that out. That's exactly what we see, in my opinion, the men who are part of the democrat party. Some of it is just a nurture. Your parents were democrats here, you're democrat, but I think a lot of it is men with different reproduction strategies. The men in the democratic party believe their best chance of reproduction is to make women happy.

we suggest that will eventually all become republicans. I've got a theory that there's a certain about a marriage, the terms everybody into republican just a theory. I don't have any years emerge. It takes to turn you into republican, but what happens? Probably within five set out.

What is it? What is the reproduction strategy of republican men? What does the reproduction strategy of republican men versus democrat men? I do believe the democrat male strategy is to make women happy and that there and then they'll have in him, and the republican strategy is what act like men, their strategies to act like men and then see if that works out for them. It turns out because when they act like men, they attract a certain kind of woman who want somebody who acts like a man does. as somebody who agrees with all the time. That's that's not exactly reproduction material there so zone my opinion. Everything is explained by that.

Now, as was also pointed out, teachers, unions or like three quarters female, people who are doing d and people work and human resources, and basically most of the groups, their active and really make a difference. true the female wrong, and so it really has become a know. Male party versus a female party, abortion being most the clearest distinction. If you didn't know what the the issue us, let's say, you you're an alien and somebody said: well, you don't know even what abortion is, but we'll just tell you this there's one group that says we want it: As one groups who says you we don't want, that is the group this as they want it most likely the ones

You are going to have it. Yes, it makes sense that women would want options. If, if I were a man, if I were a man allegedly a male, but if I were a man who could have a baby, I would want I would want to. I would want abortion to be legal, not because I wanted to have one, but because I want more rights, not fewer everytime. You said Scott, would you like more rights or fewer rights? Whoa? I don't even know what the subject is, but how about more and that more rights I'll always take more rights,

Now, if you're saying to me but Scott, you would be killing children, I'd say no, no, I didn't say I would get an abortion. I didn't say that I would encourage you to get one. I would say that every time you asked me do you want to have more options are fewer options. I generally default to more options and I think people in general do people in general want more options now fewer. So it makes sense to me that the the woman party, the Democrats, would move toward making giving themselves more options and it makes sense that the the male dominated party republicans would be less likely to do that because to them it just looks like murder,

So you don't want to give somebody the option of murder from their point of view, but you can't, but you can sort of predict everything. That's going to happen based on the mom and dad male and female procreation model that now how much? How seriously should you take this. Here's how seriously remember I told you that only two things you can now the firstly you can now is a? U exist because you're new with the question of who you are so there's something that exists. You just don't know what that is. The second thing that you can know is that is your impression that some things are predictable. That's it. You know, science in particular, is more predictable than most. But if that's all you know- and I

I give you the the various models are predicting. Does follow the money predict? Well, it does doesn't it. I don't know if it should, but it seems to now here's. The second thing does follow procreation as the the dominant way of understanding things to happen. Does that predict? I think it does, but I dunno if it predicts as well as follow the money. If you ever got into a situation where it was one or the other I dunno does it does abortion follow the money sorted us, because if you say to people you're going to have to have a baby that you will financially support for eighteen years, that's a pretty big expense. You would expect that people would say I would like the option of not having that expense. I would like the option of not having that expense. So even abortion follows the money. Is, is a very good predictive way now I don't know if there's a reason for it. As a coincidence, it seems doesn't seem like a coincidence. I mean you. Could you could come up with an obvious

Why money affects things so but follow this? Let let's see if we can make a prediction: if the, if the at democrat party is the woman first party, would they nominate somebody like Joe Biden to lead them? Yes, they would because he's not a strong male figure at the moment. You know when he was younger. He was but at the moment he is not a powerful male and they don't really like powerful male figures. There was somebody who just looks like your grandpa will watch the kids. Would he have a date night? So that's where Biden is by Biden is basically your grandpa parent who watches the kids. While you have a date, night is very safe and where, whereas a trump,

it's really scary to him or it, let's see what else you could predict based on that model as it is there any. Is there any other thing that you could predict what about climate change? Could you predict that Democrats would be more concerned about it and maybe indirectly. Now you're an idiot orange out orange out you're out so every time somebody imagines they'd know. What's, in my mind, band stop! Imagine if you can just ask it's not like I don't tell me, My opinion on the last person who you should have to try to read my mind:

I literally tell you every fucking thing. I think you don't have to guess I'll. Give you my reasons and and to be clear, I'm not supporting trump for reelection, just just so you're as clearly as possible. Could I change my mind? Do you think I could change my mind, yeah, absolutely sure good, I'm just saying at the moment. It's not my choice of the moment, but you know I have to make real world decisions as well. Alright, is there any prediction you would make about what protection would you make based on only the gender procreation model? Is there anything you would predict based on it.

Socialism, yeah, I mean you would predict that the Democrats would want more socialism gun control, yeah yep. There was a story in the news of some woman who is getting carjacked and she just blew the head off of one of the carjackers and the second one returned fire and she got wounded but survived, and I thought what would you see? Women take immense heads off where we're in a whole different world, but good for so twitter? Amnesty is common. So I guess musket said he did a poem. Seventy two percent said they wanted full amnesty. You are, in my opinion, that if you are ever going to do full amnesty, this would be the one best time to do it does. Indeed, I was his suppressed,

you're, saying it's a once: only new ownership, and yet, if you get banned again, don't expect to come back. It's a perfect time to do it now will the will the experiment work? Do you think twitter will become hell hole of racists, kkk and everything else I'm going to say a little bit a little bit. You know so some of the bad people will come back and they'll they'll test the system. The first thing some of the bad people are going to do is what. They're gonna try to get banned the it. So they get to say some shit just to get back to get used to and they get a push the the anvil, o brien, so subtle just get banned again, and I would be happy if all twitter did was stick to its own guidelines. Fruit abandon ex time because those same people disappear if they violate twitter terms of service.

so I'm not really too afraid of it is thereby worried about. I think, will be a little little churn and turmoil. Therefore, little bit there no big deal now. If you're saved yourself, this is a good decision or a bad decision, which one is right. It's a good decision to bring him back or it's a bad decision. Who's right go in in the in the comments who's right go. Ah, how could you fool for how did you fall for my trick? Okay, if I told you that's a trick question, it's a trick. Question now answer to get it's a trick. Question oh, come on come on, come on, come on, come on.

I totally primed you so that you can see it so, and so I created cognitive blindness in you. Here's the cognitive blindness! When I tell you the real answer, you're gonna go! Oh shit. I would add that I believe that this can a piss you off. now the real answer, as he's a be testing rapidly, there's no writer is not is not good or bad is something he's gonna try if it doesn't work, you can immediately reverse it. If you're talking about whether it's a good idea or a bad idea, you're not even on the right page you're, not even in the right conversation, the question is: is testing it smart or not, smart, and for that there's not really much debate. Of course, tests to get a sport. Of course, now, if you test that doesn't work, what would be the smart thing to do them? Reverse it reverse it.

Report in some rules that now gradually reverses or something so, if you No understanding why he's doing is moving fast, breaking things and then adjusting then you're missing the shell. the show is not the now you must do incorrect legs if you're looking for is a correct that incorrect. It's you miss in the home tell the whole show is that he doesn't know either. None of us know. Nobody knows the right. The right answer he is finding out. He is just putting it out there completely transparent here. It is. Did that work? Oh that didn't work. I guess I'll do something else. Scott waited for two years to speak up against force masking and lockdowns Janna you stupid, cunt, that's not true! Completely false, never been

favor of mandates, boob stupid, cunt, alright, by the way, that's something I couldn't say with full immunity before do you do, I can call call by trolls stupid guns and I don't get knocked off of social media. Do you know why not because of elon know this, because I do it with respect there is that I could call women stupid cuts as a result could call men fucking decks, because I respect their full humanity like. If you come at me, I'm not going to take it easy on you, I mean if it were a physical fight. I'd, take it easy on you, but I'm not gonna. Take it easy on you because you're, a woman.

you, don't get that not I'm not on twitter and twitter is just fuck, you that's that's the whole conversation alright. So what was I talking about? Oh the twitter, amnesty, so yeah, it's just a good idea to try it We'll find out later, if it's a good idea to keep them, there was definitely good. I didn't try and let's talk about. The moral logo situation and and nick fuentes and yea and milo so,

in my opinion. Well, sir, is first of all the trump responded. He said he basically at a good conversation with the yea there, one well courting to jump and that in and just at the end of his statement egos- and I didn't know who nick went it was: do you believe that do you believe that the president didn't know who nick went it was? I wouldn't have believed it, except for acts, uses reporting so access if you dont, know they're not in the bag for the left or the right, which is very like people always ask hey. Why can't you have a new source? This neither it had left were bigoted right. We have one actually use actually does genuinely. I think follows where the news goes:

Actually I reports that some verbatim from it and we do now from axioms that trump was asking next winters who he was so if No that that trump asked him who he was and even asked him if he was represented to the extreme part of his party. You can see that trump was catching on who he had at the table right. If, if axios has the right reporting- and they do it be before he makes fun of axios go go. Do your own research on that. I think you'll find out that there they play it straight. If I'm wrong, let me know, but I think they try to play it straight away. If it's true, that trump was asking who he was and asked him directly if he represented the extreme part of the party, you can see that trump was working through it and they didn't know exactly who he was

So I believe that I believe it is now now. Do you think that trump handled it well from your perspective, by saying, even though he was so, therefore is not exactly a big crime or a big fell, it was just didn t think so for it from the perspective of chums base. Did he explained is sufficiently, I think so, from from the perspective of a voter, this kind of all you needed to know. Wasn't he wasn't invited trump trusted yea?

I trusted a black man which, unfortunately, is part of the story right, so so the whole story is that the trumpet trusted the black guy and that didn't work out for him. Am I right? That's one way this. Is that not an inaccurate interpretation? Trump's problem was he trusted a black guy and he got screwed. Well, no, I don't think it's fair to call kanye a black guy because he is sort of the sort of transcended race and a lot of ways, but

We usually spelt that way to me it looks like a black guy screwed trump and I like yay by the way, but it looks like he did. That intentionally can't tell I can't read his mind, but it looks intentional and from the outside, as I look so, it looks like a black guy took trump out or tried to and trump's just brushing it off. Because now do you think people will just forget this story in two weeks, so it doesn't really matter the base. Will the base will forget it

the day, but here's what you're, forgetting you're missing the biggest part of the story. The best part of the story is it doesn't matter what trump's base thinks it always did, but it doesn't now. Do you know? Why didn't why? It doesn't matter what the base thinks of trump, because the media already left him so Breitbart when Adam hard and if you noticed but Breitbart, didn't pull any punches just trump at dinner, with a holocaust denier and famous anti semite according to Breitbart and fox news is shutting trump out. So fox news will not support a wall, which means you know, other rupert murdoch assets will not support him and, and now Breitbart is gone. Breitbart isn't coming back from that, like they're, not they're, not going to call him anti semite

and then changed their mind, so I don't see that happening. Do you believe, do you believe trump could win without fox news or without Breitbart, yes, or no trump could win without Breitbart and without fox news, mostly ss. Yet there is a path. There is a path and the path would look like

could podcast solely. So, if trump just said, he won't do any interviews with the major media and said I'll. Just do I'll. Do all the podcasts, because Eddie, if you said yourself but wait, nobody's gonna watch the podcast cause they're like low low volume, no they're, not the podcasts, are much bigger than the network news and anything that trump does that's an interesting interview will have greater greater traffic than a b c news, one that you don't think I could get more traffic for a trump interview like. If I personally interviewed him on a podcast, you don't think I would get more clicks than a b c news would get

And the story about trump I would I would get more. I would get more attention than a b c news, just telling a story about him, so he does have a path and there would be plenty of podcasters who would who would wanna you to benefit from the traffic, so they do it. He could start his own. He could start his own, he. You start his own network gently I'll, just a channel on youtube and or rumble. I guess and. Then we could just overview other people. Imagine trump running for office. Just imagine this margin trump running for office, but he doesn't do any interviews. He only interviews other people and that's his campaign.

Think about it. He doesn't do interviews. He only interviews, experts and Democrats who disagree with him and that's up, and maybe some rhinos who disagree with him. Can you imagine how much you would like to watch trump interview his critics seriously? Could you could you avoid watching him at all my god, oh my god like it, it would be so watch a bowler. Would just blower reveals the water, and

and as soon as you heard, by the way, here's a little trick a little trick for you for publicity. This is the most important trick for getting publicity. Nobody cares that you did something. Well, you can't get publicity, because you did. Something really well did a good job. Unless it's like extraordinary here's, how you get publicity, you do something that other people have been doing forever, but you do it a different way that looks like it could work. That's what job could do. You could say well, the first time I ran for office, I just did every media interview and it was different than the way other people did it. I just sucked all the energy out of the room. Nobody ever did that before now he could say. Gonna do a brand new way again and new ways of going to suck all the energy out of the major platforms and just starving and just make my show the only thing that's interesting on tv, because it would be nothing else, would look

just think of you that he would immediately like make everything-