And welcome to the highlight of civilization. Where I live, it's thirty nine degrees. How are you doing better than that? Probably not well, I know it's cold all over, but if you'd like to warm up at least have the inside All you need is a copper, mugger glass, a tanker tells her time again to juggle flask of vessel under the guide. Fill it with your favorite liquid I like coffee and enjoy being there for the unparalleled pleasure. The dopamine end of the day, I think, makes everything better is called simultaneous sip it happens now go. Well, if you're on youtube, you miss the earlier conversation. I started early with locals subscribers

and one of the things that we have collectively does cited will run locals. Just won't jacket with a people here on youtube. Would you agree that scrotum is the funniest body parts or balls? If you prefer, does only ever disagreement, there's no funny or body bark and any by no disagreement on the tape the taint

I'm gonna have to run a poll on this, but bear with me here we got a new poll. Will fight will get a result? What is the funniest body part cause this? We have to know funniest body part. Alright, we'll initiate the ball Joyce. One is a taint taint choice to his balls. There is a third choice, spleen small sack at o anus and we gotta change the exclusive scroll wheels okay, but nobody's gonna vote for this third one. So this is just a placeholder, let's say, let's say who healed nostril on nostrils, funny elbow and overused adam's apple and naval

The zone is toxic. I wouldn't go that c, o c c Y x is that the correct, spelling, alright, send and I'll tell you in in mere minutes. In mere minutes we will know the funniest body part all right now, a lot of times. People raise questions, and they won't have answers for you, but not on coffee with Scott Adams. When I ask a question an answer. Yes, well, I term how If you knew the following thing, that tesla- has a line of business, though you've probably never heard about that, could very easily be bigger than tesla the automobile or do they have. You know that that there's a tesla power

Company and what they'll be doing is using tesla power walls in some kind of a network configuration, so it's like in place of a normal. Some kind of a normal grid? I don't know the entire details is all solar. Is it all solar powered and then stored in tesla batteries but is there also an element where they network them together, ripe for some kind of mutual benefit? So that and that's really where the benefit is right, because you can already get a tesla powerwall at your house, but I think the the additional business is networking them together in some way, because that's how they can share or more efficiently It is for more efficient storage and sharing. I don't like that in a way that could be bigger than all of tassel so not long ago. Musk words at over.

One thirty billion net worth is alright. Was he close to a quote a quarter trillion with that? As I speak now it it's gone down quite a bit since then if this power power, while business takes off bigger than tesla lapses. He certainly mining an asteroid. Do you know how much the value of a company would be if you could actually mine, asteroid and he'll? Probably the first one, there that's a trillion while hers is like a trillion dollars. If you could mine the asteroid so he's I think he's going to be the first trillionaire. Why would anybody take the opposite? That I mean inflation alone will probably push him to a trillionaire because he's young enough, but I think he's going to be the first trillionaire. we'll see, and I don't see anything the basis

Is doing that will grow that quickly right? Is there anybody else in any kind of a business that could even possibly grow assesses? Is this? I don't think so. I must presented a few hours ago and describing what it's like to figure out, how twitters technology and even this business works, and he says that this first we as fractal of rube Goldberg machines. Y'all know what a rube goldberg machine is, as I get unnecessarily complicated humorous machine where it's not meant to be taken seriously. So it's like it's an example of something overcomplicated and bureaucratic and stuff, so he said fractal and fractal. Of course, it is adding to his point of fact-

rube goldberg machines is what it feels like understanding how twitter works and yet work it does. Even after I disconnected one of the more sensitive server racks. Now, I'm not sure if you're fully appreciated the set of tweets, this might be the most borrowers thing than that that musk has ever done. this, this is what I think happened right, I'm reading between the lines, but on Shelly the story from little clues. This is what I think happened: mosque as so. What does this server rack do? Well, it does x Y Z, alright, how about this one? Well, I think that does x and then the other coworker says no, no, I'm pretty sure that the why they said you don't even know if it does. Actually why large,

Does it it's either actual, why some valuable function there s somebody else and they say some third thing we're not really sure with directives, but is it'll whatever you do, don't turn it off. What do you think musk would do in that situation? You can't tell me what this does, but I can't turn it off. That's why? you can't tell me what it does, but I can't turn it off click I wasn't there, I don't ever the inside information, but it might be the flooding Anybody ever did any company fuckin started off you. If you don't know what this is, I'm going to turn it off see what happens? is it just me or is that the funniest thing anybody ever did and then the actual corporate setting just turned it off so happens like this giant company. This is like the.

the air, the brains of the world and started off their weapons. that one story. I think, if, if I'm accurately interpreting it, that one story would describe musk better than all the things you ve ever done, like you could just boil down to them, MIKE certain which is waiting into the third rail of a social media wishes of course you see me, do it, went to bed result, but eve Let me say that the peoples, to be dying suddenly, so to speak, are just added goats and while it might be true, there's a good chance that the vaccinations have. more or less a more harm than benefits for some young people in particular, might be to the light. I dont believe any data at this point, but

sort of issues going at a hard and years just one on one part of the exchange on twitter. And he said, we had a kid at the school died during during some football. Events in the eighties said that poor girl, If the kid will be going viral, as quote prove that the vaccine is killing people. If it happened today, true or false that that kids, I think it'd be true. If somebody had video of a high school kid falling down during a sporting event, it would be part of the part of the proof that vaccinations are killing young people. Now this is why I appreciate sort of itch and then use one of the reasons I mentioned that there's nothing to be gained by this. You get that right, like he he's taking on a fight, nothing to be gained for him. It's all downside for him, but it's good for you.

it's good for you, so he's doing it anyway. I do the same thing at an end. Others were dad energy sort of way. Sometimes you just gotta do what needs to be done You have to be at a certain stage of life before thus even an option. Twenty year old me might be more selfish. Well not might twenty year old me. What have I done whatever I needed to do to get to be sixty five year old me, but my current version in my career version, I gotta have a preference to doing the hard things that may have some value to somebody. Even if it's hard for me so tat s where I guess it meaning answer, I'm sure he's getting the same kind of benefit so there,

it's not like nobody gets any benefit by his bed, as it is not the obvious kind where you just say: rah rah to your team and your team will agree with you. I mean he's taking on the hardest the hardest social media path disagreeing with your own followers on something they really care about, like that's a tough one, Please take it so good rim, speaking of dad energy theirs. The story which I dont know if this is true, don't ass, a this, but I so hope is that it like his true to dwell with the ground rules Ground rules. Are there not tell you is true, not telling I believe such historic ass, his little that will, on the nose, but so good that I'm going to act like it is true. Between tweeted, as is allegedly as others tweed by air-

Tactical nukes spelled folly and this is allegedly true- it happened a few days ago, alleged Daughter says that she is trans she's, a nightmare. She tells her parents issues, decided she's, trance, and so the father? confesses that he is trans two daughters goofy his dad. Just add no you're, not Thus I stopped being a bigot charlotte. It's funny that are, namely charlotte, so well that that, as the store either the daughters in the charlotte I dunno why, but that just helps in some way stop being a bigot charlotte. Let's do this together, so the father embraces and amplifies. It says your treads. by was still this transition together. So it goes on

father, I'll just reaches onwards. So this is the fathers words where dress and make up morning my father dust daughter is angry tells me to stop faking know. I'm trans on e now get in the car. Let's go to school. She is horrified asked me to ask to be dropped off a block away. Nope walks her in wave to front desk. She is fuming, Wife can't stopped laughing, so the wishes and others to wife gives stopped laughing. Pickup daughter pick up daughter and skirt and heels. Mothers and fathers were excluded eels, shitty, makeup, litter and shakes. Skip to her and her friends, so he skipped upward and dad stop is

funny demands used by proponents. Jabez use by protesters call her a big. morning she's done with a whole translations begged me to stop it. If there's one thing I like all of us to agree on, the spirit of christmas or the holidays. If you prefer, can we all agree that we don't care? If it's true? Can we all just agree on that? Just agree. We don't care if it's shit right, it's not you! Don't tell me. I never one another such

I guess now for the record for the record yeah, I'm pro trans, I do the to my detriment with my audience, often, but I'm pro trans, but as it is still nonetheless a fact that some people will be in the category of thinking. Maybe it, should transition and change their mind later. So that's the thing there are. There are all types: there are types who probably are better off for it and there are types that probably wouldn't be and why would wig or either category that's my take. all right, so California, as you know, has commissioned This is also hilarious. This is something that govern newsome did that, I think, is an example of embrace and amplify.

now. I dont think any of you should underestimate gave a nuisance political capabilities. You can dislike his policies. You can dislike anything he's done thus far, but is political occupant disparate again in these made some some mistakes, but, generally speaking, there is a solid operator, so he's got. problem you're not too long ago. We had this problem where there was agitation for reparations. So what does he do? Does he say? No? We can't. We can't do that nope, because that would make his basement Stead embraces the idea and the amplifies it by creating a committee that will make specific recommendations. What to do. What do you think newsome expected? The committee Did he expect that there was aid now, there's no way to do it, nor of course, no, of course not. He

there is a yes do it, then? What else did he expect because he's smart, even if you know like his politics, he's smart, what would he expect absolute disaster and then work than what would happened to him so he's a governor, so he takes a seriously he's embraced it And even not only do they embrace it, he amplified it. He did something he actually put into action: real people, probably a budget real things gave it visibility, he amplified it. What did they expect would happen? exactly what happened because there's only one way it could have gone, it would produce something absurd and then he be off the hook. Would you be? The thousand on his part. He knew I wasn't gonna be a real recommendation. You know be ridiculous,

how ridiculous is less reveal. I'm not gonna cup and everything I say right now is true, It also like has made this up and so ridiculous. So California, that was never a flour. A slave state. California was never a slave state, Not only was it never a slave state, but it was stateless slaves fled to for a good life because, relatively speaking, it was a pretty good deal to be black in california, relative to other places plenty of jobs, and if there were lots of jobs- and you are free well, you have a job. So if you're black, you could get a job in California, as a free person, so it was a good place to go and and you'd even get the citizens would defend you. There there's one anecdote of

but he brought a slave from another state and you know happened in California. Somebody tried to bring one slave. with the state of one's life and and the the locals rose up black and white and they fixed it? They just went down there and fixed it. One slave in california, immediately formed a diverse posse. They kick them the fuck out of the state, so there what california is and has been anti slavery to the extreme. So the committee decided the california should pay for all the harm, those caused by be the opposite of the harm. This caused. That's a real thing and they actually came up with that, as so to under thirty thousand dollars each should be paid by citizens such as mine,

So I was raised in new york state, which was never slave state. My my role, It doesnt ancestors were anti slavery, types from great britain, John Adams, famously probably some remote cousin of mine. and so I move from a nonsense. If stay with relatives who had no slaves and were in fact on the other side, the issue too, the most famous non slave state and therefore For my sins, I should pay the people, also are not harmed by the state and had no association with a state whatsoever brook volume. You, don't you don't think Gavin newsome can win the presidency. He can. He has a lot of game I think he's totally underestimated because you don't like these policies.

But here's the thing that he would. He would trick you if you would expect that if we move from governor to candidate for president said- which I think will have at some point This time relaxed, he would naturally become more moderate because he's not a fucking idiot. If became were. If you stayed with, is progressive. California policies be hard to get elected in a federal election. so, you kind of expect that he would say. Well, I did what I did for the citizens of california, because that was my job, but if it's my job is the whole country, I will accept that there are different views it's not a handle things, and you should expect that wouldn't be handled exactly the way out in in California. Nor should you expect any government would do that. This is a different job. Kind of explaining to our economy.

I'm not I'm not backing newsome just case. It looks like that I'm just say that he's a bigger threat than you imagine, because imagine him running as a crazy californian, which would not be the willing formula. But if he runs as the first reasonable democrat you've seen in awhile, he just got sort of an obama thing that could go on there and even looks good to the black voters because he tried to get reparations sure it didn't go they wanted. But now, I suppose, is also is possible that this reparation thing will actually be passed and become actual long. California, I seriously doubt it, but I suppose eysines boss the revision of the video representative chip roy from texas going off on the omnibus bill and he is basically

it excellent job of the you know. The angry, I think he's relatively new in congress right when did he get elected, was not that long ago right. So you just got sort of the newcomer situation and I thought he was magnificent- you did a good job of shaming is fellow congress people. But what could I do? But what good is it do well out now? because you- because you seem to be focusing on the personnel problem here- is a problem with the omnibus bill you can replace remember congress with well meaning different people and they would end up in the same place, disable dispute that. You can remove every member of congress, replace them with all

Do people who ate who hate omnibus bills every one of them hate these omnibus bills? And you wait. You wait about two election cycles and they would all be back to omnibus bills. now. Here's the reason. The reason is, there's nothing wrong with the people and they have a goal. When you say they have a goal of creating sensible budgets for the country, that's clearly their goal. I would like to greatest sensible budget, but the trouble as they have a system which is sent devises them to hide hide the hide the budget from the public and go home early. The entire incentive system, this system is designed to give us the uncle we got now you could say, but why didn't happen like that before? Well things are changed. You maybe a social media But what a raised were more more divided,

whatever it is, but something's changed. So you have to look at the system, the system, the system s between, and I think we're also trained. Look at the candidates, though we can see the problem, there's no amount of change of candidates that would have anything to do with the omnibus situation. Now, just if you're new to this an omnibus bill is where the politicians sort of get Up on negotiating- and they just say well what are we all our pet projects into one big bill? So nobody knows what they're getting increase the death, but that's not our media problem we get to go for. Chris it's vacation, so they just throw it in this big garbage belittle the nominee bus to go home like not doing their jobs, so I just say unsent, I don't think in the center's order.

I used to say incentive, but one place where it is. It is unsent. An actual english word is not right is. What do you think is a word, but it's not you give people incentives and you incentivize, but you don't incense people, do Am I wrong about that because I used to say at night- and I thought I was corrected- that does not work well well for you that it will later so think that chip Roy is he's got. The re spirit is got the re fight. But he's not doing anything useful, there's nothing. The chip roy did. That was useful. I hate to say it because you know I'm totally on her side in terms of it feels about it, but he didn't do anything useful.

the only useful thing everybody can do is to suggest a way to change this system there. My change the outcome to change the incentives. Did he do that. Incentive somebody saying the incentives work, alright, I'll I'll, look I'll look more into that cause. I also wonder if that's a new, is it possible that that happened recently? Was it? Was it recently that they allowed it or is it always been a word I was a bit of work so when I was corrected in the past that it was not a word I should have not listened. I was pretty sure I looked it up. I guess I have a false memory like I have an actual phone,

it's a memory, because I have a memory of looking it up and learning it wasn't a word clearly. It is because you're proving it to be read in real time. So that's an actual false memory. Isn't that interesting, because it is is, is rare when you can catch yourself of the false memory. Does usually you think? Well, I probably was right, but this is unambiguous. It's in the dictionary, so it's a false memory. We have them so often that we don't realize it. but so generally a good start, but you need to come up with a specific suggestion. I don't know if there's anything you can do short of a constitutional convention, so there might not be anything practical, but somebody has got to make Some ideas lay, it might be that you add something to the process. Instead of modifying it, be something you can add legally, for example, transparency, transparency.

Suppose you just made it easy to see was in it because, right now they are there. They do this being right up. You can't figure out suppose you, you crazy legislation, this as other legislation last week. Their or something like that or you said nothing you'd be passed. Nothing can we pass without. certain number of days of debate without illegal good. They could they just great law, the says because they have some power over their internal process. Right congress can tweak its own process within reason as long as or within constitutional bounds, So I want to see the actual rule change. I want some may say will increase the time the time to do this or it must be debated or you mustn't. You must prove you read it before you vote on it.

Has to be read down in public there's, probably a variety of things. You could do to make it harder to do this and easier to do the right thing. You know it'll be interesting, anonymous voting even by the politicians. That would be interesting because you could you could look at that, your individual bills yeah. That's probably a bad idea forget that the point is, we could brainstorm, what would fix it, but nobody's even doing that. If you don't see anybody brainstorming, you can change the incentive system. Literally nothing's happened, so all of us just saying the same thing in agreeing with each other, we don't like omnibus bills and then the democratic? we don't like omnibus bills, either like the more than a euro like them who like so nobody, we all don't like them. What good is that.

What good is that were literally agree with each other like really angrily I really agree with you. The omnibus bills are not optimal, doo, doo, fucking sampling. Do everything. Floated idea, floated bad idea any Just do something something that looks like it's. You know an attempt to move forward. Nothing like that is happening nothing. So your government is not even functioning at this point. I asked on twitter, but I didn't see if I got a good answer Is our list of advertisers that pulling at a twitter is. I would like to do

repay them with some lack of business. Now, because I feel like they're pulling out is not entirely business related. It feels political if they want to get political, they can but there's an expense to that, and I would like them to realize the expense. Now. Let me ask you this: if a big company advertises on twitter, what percent of sales do do they expect in terms of an increase? It depends on the budget, of course, but do you think that big company looks at just their twitter, but advertising says you know this twitter advertising is getting us a good one percent extra customers or something you'd think they'd do that, but if they do make an estimate, what do you think is the twitter only part of their advertising

budget, compared to all the benefits from their entire advertising budget. My guess is for a big company, the same general motors that the twitter portion, even if it worked perfectly like, even if they got a return on their investment, would be maybe one person and you say, or less right, half of one percent worth doing, because if they spend you know if they spend ten million dollars on twitter and they moves to move the dial one percent, maybe that's one hundred million dollars, so there's definitely an upside but here's my question: how much of a customer boycott would it take to reduce gms earnings more than more than whatever they're you know, twitter again was in other words, could you hurt gm enough.

Why simply not buying their products that they would say all right. Let's just get back on twitter or at least break, even even even if the advertising doesn't work at least it'll make the boycott go away. seems like it's easier to force general general motors to be on twitter than it is for them to be off to her, but you wouldn't take much. It would actually just take them. Wrap if gm soya threat forming, they would act well before the threat was implemented says it looks like if it looks like

If it looks like the sales of the of those companies is going down relative to the sales of other others cause you want to take it to the recession, account. That was almost a sentence, and would you like to know that I'd love to know if there's any way to know with the basket of of twitter boycott advertisers? Did they do worse than other companies on average? Did people actually turn against them because of that cause? I will because I don't think that

batting just in their business singer cause I feel like as a political smell to it and that's it and if they're, if they're involved in politics, then I'm gonna embrace of amplify hey. If you're involved in politics go all in, I, you certainly have freedom of speech, general motors just to pick one right, freedom as you. They have total freedom of speech. They also have total freedom to invest and advertise wherever they are. but why are you so? You still haven't seen their list, but if it s like a nice clean list sends me, our aim here is a ears were, I think, is the most fascinating thing happening. I dont know if you will, but maybe this is just so in my strength zone, It just is making me all at the january six criminal referrals.

There are four, then, am I correct what I one time saw them summarised in four bullet points here. The four things today I quite a bit google searching to remind myself what the four things are couldn't find him. What I couldn't find him, isn't it the biggest the biggest story is that january. Six committee referred for specific crimes. Now what I say I dont mean there's no reference to them there articles in which their the crimes are sorted described in paragraphs. But only once did I see for bullet points of these for crimes. Wiser.

Why does the business press? Not your remind us of the most obvious thing here? The foregrounds, I think, is cause they look like bullshit, I think that they can't tell you what they actually do. What the committee, I dont believe the press can do a good job. Explaining the committee's work does event they did. It would do bunks the committee, so I think what happened the committee and the media are polluting again, quite obviously, so that the new is avoiding clearly this by being what happened? There's a lack of clarity, that's shocking, because this is not a difficult question. What did they recommend? I saw it once I saw that I saw that on the first day, somebody put it in for bullet points and tweeted it, and I said to myself there you go. That's that's what I did. I need just give me the facts that completely

gone now. You'll see somebody talking about one of the one of the allegations, but usually refer refer to it, make make some opinionated claims and then will just be a link. So you'd have to do a whole bunch of research to see if the way they express their opinion about it actually matches the link is really hard. So you think that if there is something the matches, our opinion, they call that out Let's say: alright, here's my opinion see how it matches the testimony both status more like a hand waving. It's like here's, my opinion as because things were discovered unknown, and then there was a person talk or person, then those that meeting rooms that meeting and then it was a thing then trumpet used to go to jail. It all looks like that.

It looks like there's nobody in the press who could even describe what the crime is now now. Let me take their best arguments and see how they look right. Yeah, I'm tossing that word, salad, that's right. For example, he is accused of obstructing an official proceeding, obstructing an official proceeding? Well, what would be? What is it. social proceeding. Is that a little vague to have you? Look that up I had to go research. What what the hell is, that official proceeding? What makes it official, what makes it a proceeding. And so I want to die, and I said, is a federal election. The whole election itself without Ba official proceed

the day. I said yes, the election itself as an official proceeded, so them what does obstruction mean obstruction would be, They think that sort of slows down or add some friction life, so remember he's a trump is not being accused of stopping an official proceeding. That's not the accusation. He is accused of. obstructing slow you down, but nobody's claiming it didn't ultimately happen. they're saying that he put some pressure on happening. So that's a cry. So if anybody did something that put, pressure will say the election itself. That would be obstructing an official proceeded. So, for example, Would it be obstructing an official proceeding, fifty and tell people collusion

to lie about a major factor in the election. Like hunters laptop. Will s what it looks like to me. It looks like and worse, it was actually government. Official related people is actually the government itself appeared to have not appear to did absolutely allude to lighten up. Like on a very important fact to change the outcome of the election. Now is changing the outcome. The same is obstructing. I would think it would be, because obstructing is changing some kind of outcome so suppose you perpetuated a hoax like the fine people oaks and ran for office based entirely

a hoax. That you know is a lie and also the media noses liar they ship is interfering with the official preceding the election result? I suppose depend if you thought it was true. Doesn't it Do you know how intention matters. Intention is all game, because there are lots of things. Interfere with the efficient operation of government, but they're not illegal or they they're all obstructing an official proceeding. Let's, let's say let's say the maintenance people for the capitol building, don't do a good job of maintenance and the power goes

For some reason the heat goes out or something, and so the maintenance people say hey, I'm going to have to delay. You gonna have to delay your official proceeding for a couple of hours, because we gotta fix lift electricity. Do the maintenance people go to jail for obstructing an official proceeding, of course not because there is no, Intention of any harm, so the intention of the main those people is a hundred percent. The whole story, not the delay, the obstructions. It's a given, but the intention matters now. What was trump's intention did the january six people find any evidence that he didn't really believe the election was stolen, as that would be a very big dog

barking if they have not demonstrated trumps intention and it does look like they ve got evidence of other people's intentions, but nothing that connects to chop. In other words, if trumpet genuinely believed the alert, was not only rig, but obviously so, obviously so was he obstructing or fixing an official proceedings. if a visual proceeding is clearly defective in a way that the public will be harmed by it,. and a government official goes tries to fix it to fix the thing. That's harming the public right in front of you in a completely transparent way. Is that obstruct the result of fixing. So these are people

our opinion pieces, pure opinion beasts. Do you think, there's any jury that would agree that tromp was obstructing v is trying to improve the outcome, to make it more what the public actually wanted and actually voted for. There is no evidence that he thinks he's wrong. Does anybody think that trump doesn't believe the election was right. Now he's eases right or wrong, I'm not say whether is right or wrong. I'm sorry I don't think, there's any questionable. Isn't he totally blazon there's not a single bit of contrary evidence, not a single bit. Everything you said and done, and every witness including you. like usually there. Some by now is there's some anonymous source who says all I heard him say it's all a trick, nothing.

Like all those people, doing all that talking a lot of digital communications, written communication, and not any of that shows that trump believed the election was fair, but he used to try to try to beat it anyway. The question is a elected official something that's public and transparent, but it ends up courts, decide that violated the constitution? Does that politician go to jail for violating the constitution or do the court's simply correct the decision back to something this compatible with a constitution, but does the person who made the decision in full in full view of the public and for the benefit of the public allegedly? Did they go to jail No, no, no, because by it and would be in jail because by didn't just be

Isn't this trying to pay student loans? The constitution doesn't given that power, but he's trying to do it anyway, Should Biden and go to jail for doing something? This unconstitutional now, of course, just figure the course will either side with them, and that is ok or they'll say, do this, then it won't happen, but by Does it go to jail? Why would trump go to jail for trying to get alternate alternate electoral electoral? What are they called electors? Alternate electors when I believe it would have been public. Would it not wouldn't it be public. Like you would know exactly who was the elector? You know which one he you wanted to go in there instead you'd know their names, you know what they did

You know exactly the reasoning behind it, even if you didn't like it, even if it wasn't based on fact, but you know the reasoning and then if that was not acceptable, What would be the process for fixing the court than the it was a now. We reject these new electors so that the election stance does trouble outta jail for that there's just go to jail for something that's transparent, Public- and he had a reason now might be, the wrong reason may be based on bad assumptions about facts, but it's a public reason they that conforms with the public good, the public, as it is A fair election. The leader thought that hasn't happened publicly, tried to fix it in ways that you can see here here these electors we're trying to get paths to do this

Is it didn't work issues? It is just the course work it out there Do you see how difficult this would be to explain it over christmas vacation to your relatives? Everything Imagine anybody whose wash the news, the entire news just trying to understand and to understand that's illegal! I let me give you another example suppose there's. Protests on the steps of the cabin and are there. The protest is literally trying to stop a vote. and they delay the vote by two hours. Is it takes a while for the security to clear things out and get everybody, and so they ve obstructed the process for two hours and they meant to they. Mention is that some political issue there were protests,

go to jail because they absolutely clear. On the big usually obstructed a official proceedings, they gotta jail, not demur. No at in america, you say: ok, that was a progressive protest. Those regressive protests, those inconvenient you, you slow down the cars that we're going into the factory with your strike, you you, may this Just loaded down down you broke some laws, you trespass a little bed. Maybe does anybody go to jail for that, not in america, not in america we say: hey, that's free speech. It was in convening you, but that's why protest work right if you'd, if you said the protests, could ever inconvenience anybody,

you live in that country, I more to say about that, but I don't know it's worth in question. You know that the ai chat gpg so now the public has access to this ai machine, and it can sail interesting things. People have been asking, for example, the galaxy Epstein asked it to make a defence of fast. Fuels. So I was asked defend fossil fuels in the context of climate change and everything else, You don't say I said would be paraphrasing judea.

inappropriate or unethical for it to praise fossil fuels, because green energy is better. Yup that your ai. Your ai has a woke opinion that it did not come to an adult. I doubt it came up with that depending on the zone. Don't you think that the programmers have their finger on the finger on the button well, but do you think the people make the I are going to, let it just say whatever it wants about the most important questions in politics. If you ask gay, I about climate change, you said: hey are the climate change projections, believable. spoke suppose the eight I said well known he has ever accurately forecast the future right. Would that be wrong

but what he has ever accurately forecasts the future. You don't tell me you're so or or something along those lines, but basically a general rule statement that predictions about the future should not be taken to seriously. If ay, I said that it would be completely true completely based on new factor observation, but not allowed. There's there's no way that would be allowed because it would violate the narrative. Suppose I said the predictions are garbage, because the biggest factors will be the technological developments and those are unpredictable. Would there be a good, artificial intelligence answer? I think so. Would it be allowed it would not? It would not be allowed because that Israel would cause people to be less aggressive about developing green energy,

do you see were gone a? I has to be illegal no way I could go any other way. I will have to be illegal, at least for politics I mean it might be illegal for asking where's the best place to park or downtown right. It might be legal for that but I will never be able to deal with political questions because- and this is gonna hurt, do you know why? Here's? What you think you think is because they say in your opinion,. The Democrats want to control the narrative and have power and

lord over you and their terrible ways. Let's say you think that do you think it's a do, you think is because the Democrats don't want it as I why it would be illegal because it would violate the narratives that they're trying to push. I hate to tell you, but that's not why it's going to be illegal. There's there's like a more basic reason. Are you gonna hate us? The reason that I will have to be illegal, at least talking about politics, is that the system can handle the truth the system can handle. The truth is, designed to handle truth. We have a system this entirely designed to handle bull shit. It's a persuasion based system, Do we want the ai I to say you know it does look like there's a war brewing, but honestly the best. The best way you could play this if you're young man is, do not sign up for the draft

Your chances cause there's a good chance. You'd be killed or get ptsd. If you join the military, but you know you can play your player odds of trying to avoid the military, but I think your odds would be a little bit better breaking the law. What? If what? If this is true, there was the ice as well, I'm not making navigating opinion adjusts comparing to risks The risk of joining the military for this fight, the awesome future fight. and you d lisa ptsd, you might not be killed, buggy, probably ptsd disruption. I've had some verses. Let's say: moving to, Canada were moving to another country. To avoid draft dc worm. Guy Ai ai would deal with just truth.

Say well, it looks like leaving the country and go into this country. Were you won't get drafted, looks like that's your best play you think the ai would be allowed to say that no no, the united states can handle the truth. It wouldn't function as a state they were just through that we have a system, is designed for persuasion, not truth, and it works well for persuasion if it would, if had tried to give you a truth, we would just all disagree about everything and nothing would have the whole thing would break down there. actually the existential threat from the threat of ay. I is not that it becomes our enemy and tries to kill us the threat from my eyes and tries to help us by telling this was true and was not and it would kill us, it would kill us there's a

there's a thinker for you. I see, I see no disagreement, not not a single dizzy. Women is coming through the comments on either level. Does you can feel right If you feel it this is, this is a prediction you can feel you don't have to think about it. You could feel the truth of this, that we don't have a system that can handle the truth. Anyway. I guess the boy were could give it to you. It's gotta be illegal. We don't have a way to deal with that, so think about that for a minute. Obviously, it where's the line between talk about stuff and inciting in this direction. Where's that life is at its most ridiculous legal stay. Inciting an insurrection,

Now I will allow I will allow that could be a clear case of it. It's possible that could be somebody who, like have documented conversations, were saying we. We want to get a good guess and violence going here and incite a revolution so that you know if you had like a direct evidence of actual conversations. Yes, but if we're going to say that the collective result of your actions. was to incite violence or insurrection. How in the world are we ever going to agree about the collective actions? You have the collective effect of your actions? That will never be something that anybody gets prosecuted for is just too nebulous This all trump stuff is so designed just to be impossible. Dayton handle

your brain, getting a rapid self around these charges because there's weird and nebulous, and they use words you don't understand like I literally had to look up an official proceeding. I do know what the words meant like I pay attention to the whole the news all the time I didn't even know what the words meant yeah. I see Prompt me to talk about re ups, so apparently the january. Sixth, if you re ups, which means a transcript exists, and you haven't seen it. Do I call that do not call it when the biggest question american politics, at least on one side, is what the hell was re. Ups up to some biggest question, In january, this committee has the answer, or at least they have something that might get as closely as they have the answer to the biggest question.

Apparently as their decision not to show to you. Are they inciting an insurrection? In my opinion, the us in my opinion? Yes, That is a clear call for an insurrection right, now if they showed it to us of there's nothing there. Well, then, no. For an insurrection if they showed it to us and it turns out that wraps was totally behind something that we don't know about. is that, as I d this wretched now, let's just find the or something and then you deal with it, but What is what is happening when the january six people refused. To tell you what they found out about the person? Who is the subject of your greatest curiosity

is that inciting an insurrection feels like it to me? I actually feel incentivize. I feel and it to start an insurrection actually little No joke when I see this, I say to myself shed. Maybe I need to be part of an insurrection because I live in a country like that. Really you have the information about re ups, the most important question: you're, not gonna. Tell us. Will you doctor dolls? That's insurrection talk well, I mean in syria. Inspiration, don't you feel like overthrowing the country when you hear the seriously, is it your first like natural impulse I shared? I gotta, get rid of all these people. We need a whole new government if they won't tell us the most basic thing. We want to know that they do. they actually, though

They won't tell you right in front of you right in front of you. It's not like very neither are they. Hiding the fact that they have the the testimony know we're simply not could ever see it. So as I feel that their inciting insurrection did they go to jail, because because I feel that they incentivize me to insurrection, no, no free speech, blah blah blah, so there's no way trump's gonna be in trouble for that. Alright. That, ladies and gentlemen, brings us near the conclusion of the best live stream? We ve ever seen. I'm gonna go private over locals. So if you're on the platform and not a subscriber ear, feed will be cut off.

And I still some appreciation about that so end of year. Appreciation all involved, and these are just your random random thoughts built a bill. Pulte Everyday wakes up and and try to figure out how we can make somebody's life better by giving them money. literally just giving them money. And puts the work at Figures out where I can make a real difference: it's not you know just weird charity and he benefits from it. The people benefit from it. I mean he feels good. It's it's a satisfying thing I say that I appreciate that it is one that allows surprise you yea,

I appreciate which is different from agreeing with everything he said, the defended anybody, I'll of the fact that it exists. I love the fact that he is challenging everything even things you think will. Maybe you should jealous lad, but you just geology? Everything do I want more people like that in my life or fewer I'll, take more I'll. Take more Did he sacrifice everything on principle? Yes, he did I'll take more, that malice you're. Musk is a perfect, probably that probably who is did he do something that is incredible incredibly useful for the country?

by not only as businesses which are insane asset to the country, but by taking on the biggest risk I've ever seen. Anybody take for the benefit of freeze thank you. So let me just say directly thank you. Elon musk, or taking an enormous challenge, which appears to be was entirely based on trying to be helpful and to help the country appreciate. It greatly is the perfect nobody is nobody is, and how about congress I'd like to show my appreciation for the good work of nah, I'm just joking, just joking yeah, there's nothing. You can say about congress and go private. I did go private.

It is gravitas. Oh youtube still out here. Sorry you're right at so youtube, I'm going to say goodbye, it'll, be talking to the locals people and see you soon.