Pepe twenty twenty two is there: anybody wants to do twenty twenty two all over again now know nobody, but twenty twenty three. I am after. Oh have a little inflation few problems, but it's gonna good now, do you think we can launch twenty twenty three. with a simultaneous zip in such a way that is evil better than you expect. I think we can. All you need is a cover. Mugger glass, a tanker, chelsea style, I canteen jogger flask of vessel of any kind, below with your favorite liquid, I like coffee. join me now for the unparalleled pleasure that doesn't mean here today. The thing that makes everything better, specially twenty twenty three it's called the simultaneous separates the last one for this

a year go that's the way to away together new year as a way to do it. I saw you tweet today about a study theirs, Just a mental illness can be spread by social media. Do you believe that? Do you believe that mental ill? now a lotta, I'm not talking about just. Let me clarify I'm not talking about the experience of using social media, there's depression and mental health issues. I am not talking about that. I'm talking about somebody has a specific mental illness and then they make up sure tiktok videos goes. Tiktok is what they look that and then other people watch the person who s a mental illness come too. I believe they have a two and then they adopt

as their identity. They don't to have a medical problem, but they are that person. There's a person with an apparently tourette's is one of them that people are watching influencers with tourette's and their parents are have to have to take them to the doctor, cause they act like they have tourette's Do you believe it does disaster like a real thing to do Is it really does done it really? Really? It passes the really test yeah. I was tricky you because, usually what I'd do the really test? I'm gonna be banquette. Now this totally past the really test. Really somebody issues, social media. They copier. Yes, yes, very recently, Have you seen the videos of dogs imitating? The illnesses of their masters. Did you know that was a thing? Apparently, this

a number of videos, museum on social media, wear it the older. He gets a limp, they hurt their foot in their olympic. The dog will adopt the limp as long as a person as that's a real thing. So you don't think that that happens to people too. Now maybe those videos or r or pranks or hoaxes or something but the the general concept is that do people do adopt Other people's mannerisms is pretty automatic. Let's my dad drumsticks returns. Well. The the walls are closing in the walls and close it. Finally, Finally, the that the democratic get what they ve long hoped for if we can only get his tax returns, will be like the rules that Estonia will unlock the financial

Crimes throughout his empire finally will find out all the best. Things? You can do it all along? Now we know allow me to mention some of the bad bad things we found on his taxes. Number one he made large charitable donations. I know I know I know you used to like him a lot of you you're like pro trump. You like I used to like him. You serious. He made large charitable donations, while the story is that there were so large that there's a question about whether substantiated but am I wrong that they use to mock for not making enough of a charitable contribution? Are they marking in both ways?

Once when are you didn't have much and now has a lot and their mark? You both ways pick one, but what about this? Oh, my god, this is terrible. The trump organization has lots of overseas businesses. In one. One of them has a barely this. I have a bank account in china. There's a bank account in china. Of course, it was fully disclosed when trump ran for president. So it's not a new bank account it's one. He fully disclosed when he ran for breath. it just associated with some business over there. There's no suggestion there's nothing wrong with it, but domain. It had live and see. If that helps us

it is treated as a before? Basically saying? There's nothing to the story. How about this Oh no,. Oh no trump me. small loans to his children and they pay back interest and the interest. as in round dollar amounts well, so desperately damning round. Dollar amounts very suspicious So there very concerned that you may have been trying to dodge gift taxes: ok as like the smallest financial crime of all time. Trying to

dodge give taxes now, there's no indication that what they did is illegal. That's a different story because everybody tries to dodge tax. But you dodge them and all the ways that are legal and available. So there's no indication is illegal. Just raises a question areas The question then there's his helicopter revenue and expenses exactly matched. What does he have? Helicopter revenue was renting his helicopter out and the fact that they exactly matched, which is statistically pretty close to impossible. Do you think They just said to me. It sounds like somebody said: operate the helicopter at zero profit And so somebody just you played around the numbers and those exactly the same.

It doesn't mean that either deductions were illegal, that's not suggested by either the justice and numbers were now it's suspicious, but also is not a crime. Those of others is bad. There's no sign that you'd donated his presidential salary. Telling charity like you said he would think one. Or maybe a showed in the other years, not so Oh I'm not squares were impeachment. He said he'd donated charity, but in the context of lives losing millions of dollars, at least on paper, he did not. So do that way you will, Here's your financial tip for the day.

you're going to see lots of articles discussing terms, taxes and the losses that he's had twenty fifteen through twenty twond barely had tens of millions of losses each of those years and paper. If you hear anybody discuss it or writing about it and they do not matter, and also in addition to that, why is cash flow? Is you usually listen to that person? They get because europe is like basic financial information if a real estate related empire. The laws are, are crafted so there's lots of stuff. You could write off so that on paper you might look like you have losses but you're still making money in the sense that there's more cash coming in than going out

now, when, when Warren Buffett buys a company, does he look at the income statement the way the reporters are to find out? If it's a good company nope, nobody doesn't look at the income saving, so Warren Buffett the either looks at both by he easy prey. really interested in the cash flow. So the best investor in the world buys companies because they have good cash flow, even if on paper, they've written off enough, you know artificial stuff, like depreciation, etc. So it looks like zero. That's like a really good investment, so just just think about this. Just hold it in your head that there are all these people are talking about his tax returns and so far so far not one person has mentioned the cash flow,

just hold that you have is the only thing that matters well, that's an exaggeration is the main thing that tells you. If he was running is business. Well, I mean successfully. Is them it's not even in the stories the stories I can. Can I get a confirmation from those you have economic. Finally, education's you you're, everybody has the same. Education are the same page. This is not. It is not a debatable point that the job was don't even know, what Financials are supposed to look like an attack. Well, I don't have any idea. They're not even unripe page literally, not underwrite page. If the pay, Here is the is: is red income and the page or not,

He had his cash louder literally other. On page there there's your there's your news business right there That, apparently, I think we already knew this. He rode off his payments. The stormy Daniels. Do as I say, and and why wouldn't It was literally a business expense. It wasn't the amount he paid to have sex with her. it was now he bade to make sure that you can run for office so It was some guy that either was either a campaign, expense or a business expense. So I mean I would have tried it the worst that could happen. Is they say, and you know you don't get that deduction, but you don't go to jail for that. One you're you're good tax tip that you should not take my advice on if your accountants do your return and the accountant tells you

yeah? We could try that you're not going to go to jail for that abusers. An argument an expert said: yeah, it's might be a grey area, but let's try it. You can always try the grade. Well yeah. It is totally not illegal to assert your interpretation of things. You don't go to jail for that. You might pay extra taxes if they disagree and there might be a penalty, but you don't get to jail for that. That's not that's! Not illegal per se yeah! You do go to jail. If you don't pay that all right. Well, you all know that day and retailers, brother were picked up by police, I don't want to say arrested because I think they are there there detained and now the update is their detained for thirty days

What is it? What is the caution? I give you an all romanian news, don't believe any of it just assume everything out of the story is fake, untold untold, maybe later, but at the moment the servants all fake. So what does it mean to say is detained for thirty days? I have no idea detained, Do you think he's in a prison cell with the other prisoners, I'm gonna, guess not it's possible. I guess not. I think detained, might suggest he's not the same facility with regular prisoners, because I don't think he's arrested and our role. If there's no charges, what does it mean to be detained man? Maybe they took his passport? Maybe someone so I'm not exactly shortcomings and shouldn't believe anything about it. At this point and innocent until proven guilty.

we don't know what's going on there, but One reason that I think you won't be convicted of anything. Is that the evidence is already tainted dated the evidence. It said it's got taint all over it. Three tainted. I done years will in fact I didn't know, but apparently did you know that the police. in romania really well paid? How many of you knew that sort of surprising right, like romania, you think, is lacking here, but

We at least twenty two members of the romanian police department are driving the bugatti s, so I'm just waiting for a reaction to that. If you didn't know entertain to allegedly owes twenty two bugatti sports cars, but I have a feeling that the police or the police are driving. Those bugatti bugatti, and if they're not what the hell is, the point of being corrupt. What is the point of being in the most corrupt country and the most corrupt police force? Probably I'm just guessing. Don't really know that, but just guessing, if you can, if you can drive a bugatti now and then from somebody that you've targeted so yeah he's Bundy dated thirty due to our side were re ups, so original eight hundred and forty five

Page final report from the january six committee made: no, mention of re ups, even though they interview them, and even though he was the subject of the most interest by another thirty or forty. The public, the single thing we wanted to know the most segment of the public, no mention, but now we were getting some transcripts. What a surprise you to know that the transcripts or being interpreted just like it, these playing one scrape and thereby save what they want. There's some something in their transcript says he told nephew few years in the front end quote orchestrated some part of the event. so the busiest fbi, fat right. Now he was asked directly yo

You talk to the fbi. Are you a federal agent? You did you for the cia and the intelligence agencies police force, so they did. Ask him those questions. Isn't it interesting that the f b, I wouldn't answer the question, because now he doesn't work for the fbi, but one Mr Varela was asked if he worsen the f b. I you wouldn't answer. now? Is that only because he doesn't want to answer the next time he is asked? Does the next one might actually be somebody who does work for the f b? I is. Laying down the law, the rule that we don't answer that question. There were re was doing. Maybe that wouldn't be crazy. But it sure look like the f b. I have a different opinion of whether europe for world order we re didn't know, is possibly did no one way or the other.

He is an asset, not an employee yeah. We know we know he was not an employee. That part we know. So, if I say working for them, I meant no, not directly Well, so I read the transcripts and I did not see evidence that the re ups was fed. When did you see, did you say, would you read it? Did you see evidence he wasn't it tell me your interpretation.

And I'm not saying the is or not I'm saying that the transcript the transcript didn't really shed light on it. Why did you get so quiet? I thought I was going to get quick answers to this. Didn't cleared up it didn't clear it up. That's true, it didn't cleared up, but it also did not provide any evidence that he was anything but a concerned citizen. So, if I think, if I had to bet at this point, I dunno it's kind of a coin flip for me. I would say, there's there's no direct evidence, but even though he's innocent until proven guilty and so far, that would make him perfectly innocent. We do have a couple of questions, know a question no one. Why was he not arrested when he's is the most clearly guilty person that they all of em? Well documented? There was no answer that was

Doubt is that re absence problem that he wasn't arrested. There's something they re subsidies to answer to know now. That's the government needs to answer that question. Why you wasn't russen now, as the second question, why couldn't ray I say no he's not an asset. Why couldn't he answer that question? Don't know, but those are those are three things because the he was left out of the final report until people asked for it, He was arrested and ray refused to say it and it wasn't an asset. So all of our suspicion is on the side of the government is, everybody innocent until proven guilty now only re axes innocent until proven guilty? So I declare wraps

The constitution of the united states totally innocent, just like the dates, are totally innocent, but in a different way, until proven guilty. But let's talk about that government government is guilty guilty, because they're not giving us transparency and they are clearly covering something up. I don't know what but you should assume the worst as a reasonable citizen? You should say effectively effectively the government confirmed it, which is different from say they confirmed it so effectively. They did by failing to be transparent, a failure to be Transparent and clear unwillingness to be transparent has to be interpreted, as confession doesn't mean that is.

but it also, you know same way. The the citizen might actually be guilty, but your system has to assume the you have to assume the citizens innocent and you have to assume your government is guilty when the acuity right, if they weren't acting guilty, then there's to suspect, but we should start talking. That way. Is I saying I know: eps is an asset. You don't know that that doesn't sound, persuasive instead say the government has effectively confirmed it by not addressing done. There's nothing else. You need to say you don't have to show your work. You don't have to show your evidence. You don't have to make an argument. Just say the government has has chosen not to give us transparency. You you have to as a practical matter, treat that as a confession.

Try I'd saucy a year and review about no I was lack, is was all the fences, dozens era which we talk about too much? Unfortunately, but at this point consistent with see you give me one good reason: the united states has not flattened the cartels. One reason don't have enough money. Now, that's not reason. We are planning money for war. We have never run out now we ve never month with not not corruption. That corruption is the only explanation. Is that again the reason that the united states has not moved militarily against cartels. we're down to only one reason. If we had not,

exhausted all other possible reasons, then I wouldn't say that, but we have exhausted with exhausted. Do people do the does. The government understands is a huge problem. Yes, yes, so there is no question of our being. The problem is due: do they think that these are the these deaths? Are a relatively accurately counted? Yes, I mean- maybe not within ten or twenty percent, but enough to make decisions right. So we have accurate information. We know the problem is growing. We know that our government knows its problem and one of the biggest once they know the voters want dealt with. They know have a star wars and they know how to flattened the cartel. And they know where is coming from giving every reason for not doing it, except corruption asked to be crushed. Now again. If you government gave you indifferent exe,

nation. While then, I would way that and say. Ok, I don't know one way or another, but they have explained that is their obligation. I would I would be tentatively supportive. they had a reason that pass the sniff sniff test, but they're not giving a reason, they're, not giving a reason. If they don't give you a reason. You have to assume corruption because that's the default remember. The government is guilty unless they're transparent. So if you suspect that corruption is the problem and they don't do anything to you, talk you out of it,

that's. Why you're working thus be a working hypothesis as a practical matter. The government has said that certain too corrupted to deal with it by their actions are not blaming any specific person. But it's obvious that corruption is the problem, because there is no other offered explanation. No other explanation. Ballast, banning tiktok does everyone in the government? Now, it's probably yes do they know, stop it easily executive order tomorrow is eddie. If even one person arguing that we should not ban it in the united states, a politician nope, not one, there's, not a single person on the other side of the debate, and yet it's not happening. Is there any explanation other than corruption.

If they have won, I invite them to give it to me, and I will wait so, for example,. They said yeah, don't you same but then china would retaliate, I might say, hmm, I dunno. That might be a good reason or not, but at least there's a reason. At least a reason so that I can only say well, it could be. Incompetence could be fear you at least as possible, But we don't have any explanation, no explanation. It has to be corruption and again I could be wrong, but it has to be your operating hypothesis. The operating hypothesis is that as corruption, even if it isn't

yeah as wells going on here. So here is a story that the locals subscribers have already heard. But if you don't mind I'll summarize it for the rest of you, you know that- or maybe you didn't know that maybe a week ago I tweeted that you should never debate elon musk on twitter and then within the week. I found myself the what looked like a debate with elon musk on twitter, about whether the w e F and bill gates really wanted to decrease the population of earth. I say now and it's crazy to imagine that they did what they want to do is decrease the rate of growth, which is perfectly sensible, is the way you're doing it is by making people richer and healthier, which actually does reduced

population growth. So so you must go. Wait in where I was questioning whether there there's really an elite group of people planning these bad things. and you almost said this in I'm- I said that the people on the right believes that the w ass was the depopulate. This was the right beliefs and the us replied. Neither a right nor left issue and then you said about me running virus software in your brain, what and As I told the local subscribers last night,. What I saw that euro moscow insulted me on twitter, I thought well how many people we can see that wales, I I checked user user account hundred and twenty four million people.

One hundred and twenty four million people and every member of the press watched him, call me a dip shit. How was your day added twenty two and the other twenty twenty two and for you, that's how well for me now and to top it off. Not only did he he you don't call me and colleague, dipshit elementary speaking, but he did it a week after I said you should never argue with. You should never debate. Elon musk on twitter now. There there there's an ending to the story, this more favourable to me, but told the locals people I had I you to accept the fake news version of the story, because, because really really fuckin sorry, sorry, china swears much twenty twenty three, no more northward.

I I think it's hilarious, that version of the story that I said you should never do it and then I did it and then he slapped me down. That would be. That would just be perfect by all means except their version of the story. If you'd like to know technically what actually happened, he had misinterpreted my comment to be about left and right when it was closer to the opposite, meaning that, as I explained to my entire point, was that, after a number of hoaxes like the drinking glee, jokes, but hoaxes are not limited to one side and that the

it has her own houses and the belief that bill gates wants to depopulate the earth is at the top of list of an obvious. Well, I call it obvious hoax, we'll talk about that. So that was my point anyway. Why, once I I clarified it on twitter, then Musk confirmed his opinion that a w e F was not an illuminati. Try to do any these bad things, in other words, completely agreed with me and that what you see is just a result: the bubbling up of lots of individuals doing individual things, now and they said the reason he didn't go to davos- is they thought it'd be boring? That's the only reason he he he turned down. The invitation so

So the real story is that elon musk completely agreed with me that there's nobody who has power, who is trying to depopulate the earth now, but he did say that that is a widespread opinion, that there are lots of people, environmentalists and some who do want fewer people on the planet. That was not my point, although I think I was a little unclear. So that's on me, but the my point was that nobody in power has that opinion, which I thought I said directly. But then I re read it and I I left a little wiggle room and the way I wrote it. So that's on me.

The so what do you think, how many of you believe there's a video of bill gates at a ted talk in which he said he wants to reduce the population of earth by ten to twenty percent because of climate change? How many of you believe that actually exists? The cause somebody sent it to me today. it said here it is, and then I I watch the video And what do you think I saw when I watch the video? Did you say that no, this entire thing is because people can't tell the difference. between reducing the rate of growth, a good thing, verses, reducing the number of people are very, very bad thing so is only reading comprehension or this case listening comprehension.

Here's how you should have known that nobody meant to decrease in the number of people on the planet. Here's the test for that. Nobody would say that. nobody would say that, like directly and- Even the people, you think, there's a it does Alex Epstein. Suddenly a list of people were influential sought. Leaders who he says do in fact think there are too many people, and so I read their quotes and strict they're? All these influential environmentalist names you even heard so their influential enough that you ve actually heard the names who are saying directly earth can sustain this. Many people, So that means they want a decrease. The number people right. Really say that. now, I'm not so little believe it, but the examples given worse, for example, Michael man had acquired.

sometimes that either we are already beyond the carrying capacity of the earth. You didn't say therefore reduce the number of people. That's vessel assumption, because I could say the same thing, I think we're beyond the carrying capacity of the earth, but that's different from reducing the number of people who are here. I don't want to do that. I don't want to give people vaccination so they die, so there are fewer of them, it would be crazy. So the first thing you need to know is anybody says there are too many people? That's at the same issue. I want to reduce the number of them says: there's a huge problem to aid to deal What is the way we ve always dealt with it, which is innovative way out of it and the other way is, I suppose, murdering a billion people

Do you think anybody was suggesting murdering a billion people, because a number of people actually think that they were of singular? Yes feels that, yes, I think they are actually, I think there are actually in public publicly. Saying they want to murder your baby with bad vaccinations or something murder, a billion people. Really really. You think you think bill gates stood in public and said he was like murder, a billion people and it wasn't a headline or anything. So then I got and as we're conversation with this user roger that on twitter race, with a video adult of bill gates very clearly talking about reducing the growth of popular

and then he says there is. He wants to reduce the actual population by ten to fifteen percent, and I said, but your video says the opposite very clearly that he's not talking. Our total population. Do I know that he is not talking about total population there's, nobody would know but he would nobody would say that editor dock, unless they did they all is all we'd be talking about it didn't happen. You talked about the growth rate and it was very clear, elsie so you're, some of the environmentalists

the thought leaders who are pushing the idea. That are too many people which is close to its close to want to reduce the population, but is different. They're worth mentioning so years of sawyers see if you ve, heard of them mckibben environmentalist, the cabin about Michael man, probably heard of him. Eric leading ecologists, sulphur, I've heard of I've heard of all these people leading energy. Think your name loves, I don't know, loves, but I'll take it now. The counter boy here is that these are influential thought leaders and they will have impact on regular leaders,

so so there is actually like a legitimate movement to depopulate. Have they had any influence on an actual leader? Is there any leader who is also wants to depopulate? They were the earth. Now that there's not I've been nobody says it. The others, no grandmothers. So there there's nobody. There's no elected official, no elected official, buys into the population decline idea. Do you Do you know why there's no elected official, who buys it even though there are all so my experts who say it why why the politician not by it. It will be impossible to build an elected leader who says there needs to be fewer of you, guys, the people on the lack of me you, you can't get elected them,

It would be impossible to be serious leader and say Have you tried to feed you all I'm going to try to reduce the number of you know. Leader can do that. The one child policy was about reducing growth again every time you are confusing the same confusion. You always confuse growth with reducing the absolute number there's an there's. Nobody has ever tried to reduce the absolute number desperate. Now, the other, the boy the people make us, discuss: gasket you're, not seeing the forest trees whose lives

all these policies. You got your vaccination policy. Some will say that that was meant to kill people. You got your abortion to reduce the popular You got your legalise euthanasia to reduce the population, etc seller sentinel, to reduce them relation but does not leave out some examples? Did you think in recent years our government has done nothing to feed us and keep us alive That is their main job most The government is feeding S and keeping this live and educating us mean baby poorly but Ninety nine percent of everything the government does is to keep you alive if one

Some of those things are about managing growth rate. That's really far away from there's a pattern of of reducing the number of people start, even in the same of. The didn't you say no economist is for reducing growth of the population, know every economist wants to manage growth rates. Zero economists want the current number of people to shrink from it's current level to see how hard this is because it gets right. There was a perfect example. There's somebody once again: confused growth rate with absolute growth is always the same. Everybody who thinks they're disagreeing with me is just confusing growth rate with with number there's none.

Else, happily, you think there's some kind of an argument about interpretation and you think there's you you think I haven't done my research there's. Nothing like that's happened is only that you have confused growth rate with the number of people You get that right and everything you read will make sense again all the things you think look like a conspiracy. They just will dissolve as soon as you say. Oh they're, talking about growth rate, I get it now. Let's fix it, why is scott investing so much time to debunk the ws conspiracy theories. actual in question I would actually answer. Why do I do things? Let my followers won't like, whereas it would be easy to grim. I can make much more money by agreeing with you you.

That, right, if I want to make money, all I have to do is listen to it. Then Shapiro says they'll listen to any other smart republican and wherever they both agree, I would just say those things, because you know if Ben shapiro agrees with It- and you know at least one other republican, I'm just randomly picking people who are who are smart right, and I just do that and I'll just say with what they both agree with. I would never be wrong According to my audience and- and I would have a massive- what is very easy simple to do. Why don't I do it, because it's not a public good you'll be entertaining, but it wouldn't be a public good and kind of at that place where, if there's not a public good associated with my work, just not interested ass of some bigger meaning to it

so the bigger menezes I'm trying to I'm trying to create a small army of critical thinkers. Who are a level above the the public, because if I can create enough of you, then you will also teach other people and maybe we're better at sorting and was really was now so that's. Why do it and that the w E F thing is the most important one, probably on the right, because the right needs to understand that there are also suffering from hoaxes of their own there. There are not just be hopes by the other side there hosting themselves and their hopes in the salzburg yard. Both sides do that course So there is a level of awareness your level of awareness is my team is right here all my reasons. And the other team is wrong you're, not at a high level of awareness? I need to get you

to a level where you guys all size get easily hoechst, including here. You see me hawks in real time, maybe not right, Covington, kids, perfect example. I got lost right so there's there's nothing about your, I q or your knowledge or anything and even even reading comprehension. The thing is is motivated. Reading is probably not actual comprehension is a motivated way to read something. So you just sort of see what so is also realise that this happening to you then

you're a little bit better protected. So the answer is: if I can convince you, you ve been duped under w. Yes thing, you're gonna be exposed and vulnerable and it makes you look like you, don't understand, basic things and then nobody's gonna. Take you seriously when you talk about something you do understand so so that the same thing with the tax returns. If I see somebody is talking about trumps tax returns without mentioning cash flow, I will never take that person seriously again. Never, and I tried to avoid that for you, because, obviously, when I hear somebody talking about the w, we have tried to reduce the population. I disk out the next thing you say before I've been here. I don't want that for you. I want you to be strong, argues.

A strong argument is that there are a number of policies that collectively are are reducing the reproduction, which is bad. now that's a smart argument. You could say wow like all these. Things were individually decided, I get it, but if you put them all together, it's going to destroy our country, good argument and I'm totally on board with that by the way that the collective policy, These are a very damaging situation and would need to be correct, and I think we will correct them, but but it's a complete waste of time to say that, because Klaus schwab talks like a nazi, Let me just say it right: I have no reason to their clothes. Schwab has a bad guy. I think he's just the engineer and the economist those that's his background and he has it germanic kind of accident. Is austrian?

and our brains just translate that into every world were to move you we ve ever seen. So he must be bad because he sells like is always swiss. That's interesting, by. Yes, he has that that to our ears sounds like sums up. He sounds exactly like a bond valium. Thank you. He sounds exactly like a bond villain now I think it's unfair to hold that against them. Wouldn't you agree, it's pretty pretty unfair to hold that against them. If that's what's happening and I'm sure it is like, I don't think anybody's consciously doing it, but subconsciously Of course, ninety nine percent of all of our political talk, isabella heller, so if a guy actually acts just like heller, thus hyperbole, but if you talk The way this totally reminds you of hitler There is no way that you talk about heller. All your long and then once

the one guy who actually does act like hitler. The way talks, that's that's the guy you that trust. will be the only time you don't bring hitler thinking into. It is obvious that this is a hitler bias. I believe, wait. How many would agree that you don't even have to do a study. It's obvious that the Klaus schwab thing is a hitler problem and it's not his fault, totally, not his fault, A lot of people are agreed with that. The because we're humans- and it affects be as much as you write- that I'm not like superior creed, We're all influenced by things the sunlight, in fact it is one of the most. This is almost the key hypnosis lesson.

Some people ask me work and I learned hypnosis years, twenty five percent of everything you need to know about hypnosis. If you pair to ideas together, they they start bleeding into each other very go as twenty five percent of everything you learn hypnosis, because both at a is is introducing thoughts. They have a predictable impact on your other thoughts, so it's about marrying marrying concepts. So when I look at this issue. say: ok, there's no way, you can't think about heller when he talks is just too much in their heads over time. So. There, isn't any chance, you're not affected. By that same with me, there's no chance.

Bigger. Let me tell you my my opinion. I think the w we ask is totally sketchy and I'm not in favour of it. You know up due to my good reasons, are by what what is it you're my good reasons for not trusting the w EF? I actually, I think they are transparent. fairly transparent, they publish their work is because he sells. I hitler yeah, I'm completely aware of it. Yeah. You can be aware of your bias and it doesn't help yodel. That's one of the weird things about hypnosis. You can tell but what you gonna do a minister works, because the brain is just a machine. Wish the right button, you get the right result, it doesn't matter if you knew it or you didn't want it to happen. It's gonna happen anyway. It's just a machine so anyway

But even though I think they organization is sketchy unaware, but I dont have evidence to prove it. However, I do generally disagree with any entity this getting between any existing entity, Like a on a on a very meta level, you want the fewest number of people to interfere with your country and your business. On the other hand, is it crazy that the most influential people should get to know each You know you could imagine that would turn bad. You know they would collude or something, but I feel like there's going to be more benefits than than cost so conceptually there's an argument for it, but I'm generally opposed anybody getting between me and my government. So that's that's good enough reason to object to them. But I will reject everything they say they may come up or something fires. The scariest thing that I was

completely unaware of you, know that fact check dot org exists to fact jack stuff What is your experience with fact check that work? Has it been good objective fact? Checker your experience? No, various policy. Well, everybody has an opinion on the fact checkers, but I found. today that they have a sub group or a product within that entity? Called news, feed defenders. And they say it's. Our new media literacy game teaches players at length. They mean students how did detect, and

as regard information and misinformation, information, it stays chaotic environment. Now they ve actually turned it into a class lesson and they ever teachers guide. Do you think that the tipps that I give you for responding fake news, which If I may put myself in the back I'll, ask you for your opinion, but I think I've done really good job of giving you a check list of things. Look for her fake news. Did you think two things on my checklist, a fake news which you ve seen work over and over again how many times have you seen my checklist had all run over and over again it is possible. It was really well. Do you think that those run the lesson plan? Now, let me tell you what the less land focuses on.

Are you ready for this? I would ask you to do something here before I. I need leading to go like this because If there's anybody near you they're going to be caught up in the in the spray, because your head is going to explode right, ready, everybody hold your head they're, focusing on recommending that you check The credibility of the source check the credibility of the shores.

they need to die is thing I need to say about her, but really, they do. I need to add anything to this check the crew the ability, the source. Is how brainwashing happens that there pretending to be a new. literacy organization is literally a brainwashing organization. These that they will tell you if you check see then- and it was on cnn, do you think this this lesson for children would say: that's not a credible source. Oh, they say: oh odessa, that's a less credible news organization which do you think would be just guess, yeah this could not be more opposite of why you need for a healthy society.

read through some of the other tips and some of them. Some of them were just so generic like don't trust a anonymous source, not bad, don't trust an anonymous source, because that actually is completely useful and that would work. You know that that's true for left and right, it's not political at all and I've said it to say that's a good one, but it's pretty much just that at the end check the source. Now, have you seen my how many of you read my book loser. Think so loser think is a book. That's written. You know a high schooler could easily handle. It is written that, like a sixth grade level of sentence style but loser think is a book which teaches you in far more detail. Had identified bullshit now, let me give you one example:. one of my ways to identify. It is, if cnn and fox news both exist, which they do.

And one of them says the thing is true and it happened, the other one says it never happened. It didn't happen right. If both of them say it happened, but maybe they have a different spin on the importance of it or the interpretation that it happened. If they both say it happened, it probably happened. They could be wrong, but at least it's not because of as reported, even just because you know it's hard to do, but if they both say it happened there, there's not bias happening on that part. Do you do you think? Do you think newsfeed defenders would other students that, if see those says, is true but fox news.

The bright bar say is not is probably not true. Do you think they teach the students that, because that would be a good lesson and it would also be true and reverse. The fox news says is true and see it and says that never happened. I would doubt it. I would doubt it your tribe. Is your vibe criminally embarrassed. Your water just broke really said to ban Bab, says we're water just broke. If it's a boy named scott, there are very great, I feel a few water breaks, while you watching coffee was got items that that boy should be scott, and if his girl

Scott Tina, scott tina yeah, that's my recommendation all right! Well, ladies and gentlemen, let us, at closely year twenty two only two Where's my positive thoughts, raw brighter made good movies.

Let's see what else can we say positive that anybody else? You want me to say something positive about you. Do you want to challenge me to say something positive about like whoever the worse people are? Give me somebody terrible Kamel Harris. She is in the game as best I can do he Keith Olbermann, my greatest challenge. Keith Olbermann is good at getting attention. Justin trudeau makes castro. Look good. Alright, schiff remind you not to stick the q tip too far into your ear. Alright, who else sandbagged when fred, reminds us to be careful with our money? Go I can't do heller. No good dry could try Barbara Walters,

Yeah she passed away. We like Zelensky Zelensky, has excellent fashion. When it comes to t shirts. I think he's a little too green, but I get why he does it. I think he should go more or less the blues la grace, but well dressed well, dressed, sticks and hammer very successful show does does that. Does excellent content. Gretta gretta is a witty twitter. Klaus schwab push love his is an economist engineer, good for him,.

Hilary, your challenging me now, Hillary Clinton, early she's, not running for president again yea yea makes great music Epstein cows, that phone Epstein. He was nice enough to kill himself or daily german. She Pass job, so I like to reiterate my appreciation for all of you quite genuinely, and And I hope you ll have a great new year's celebration and

I hope, you'll see me in the morning, but if I don't see in the morning. I'll understand well understand. And everybody may that new year's resolutions and if not I'd like to make some suggestions. There's a nurse resolution for you. red one self help book doesn't have to be mine. The best one in the world is mine, fell. Almost everything has stolen big, but does happen.

Mine. So I'm going to I'm going to say that your your new years resolution industry, at least one self, help book more. If you can and here's why, when you do something, that's who you are thinking about. Something doesn't make you that person doing something unless who you are, if you read a self help book, what does that make you? What does it make you? If you read a book on self help, it makes you a seeker. You are a seeker of better ways: you're a seeker of better systems, you're a secret, better performance, and that, ladies and gentlemen, is the biggest change that you could ever make to benefit your life.

it's not what you think or what you plan it's what you do if you want to be a seeker, because a seeker is who's going to build a talent stack, the seeker is going to work through their own illusions. A seeker is going to and that what really works and what doesn't the secret is going to build a you know, talon stack, so don't think about big one, be one. It's a very is a very low bar is like an entry level toward a full yo self improvement. path, but do the easiest thing first, one book that you wanted to read anyway, maybe get a, maybe get a trip or something it does have to be like every weekend, just just one. But now my book is a perfect toilet book. I write them that way, actually intentionally so Every chapter is about why one bell move along. That's good engineering.

And so you can just leave it in your bathroom and wreathed chapter a day and you'd be done in a few months and your life will age doubt. My experience has been their successful people often our reading books of success. Have you noticed how many successful people- and this is my exact story-. When I was young, I said to myself, I write by family does. have riches so not now, starting with any advantage, though. Okay, ok, do people succeed. If they have nothing to start. so I thought well, there must be people who know how to do this because people have done so. I would read everything I could like every time I saw about those like how to get richer be more effective. I read it and it usually doesn't take long cause. You can glean the the big picture fairly quickly. You can read it from newspaper articles and stuff, so

As a life experience with the most, satisfying a useful thing you can ever do is to not to think of yourself as a seeker but to become one one book. Not my doesn't have to be mine, but that would be a good start, just really one self l book and if it works for you like. If, if you say my good is that actually looks like you can make a difference, then reduced, One, if the first one doesn't do anything for you, probably books aren't going to be your thing, but but if you read a book on self help- and you think I got like two really good ideas out of that read another book- it's gonna be two more I've not totally sold and rich dead poor dad. Because, Author is hawking silver.

remember what I told you about how topics bleed over and other topics, because I don't think is ethical to sell gold or silver were to be a promoter other because or not the predictable assets, I wouldn't mind if, if he promoted index fund index one, is you just be good hygiene for your investments but commodities even if it turns out to be right, even if it turns out to be right. That's a that's a credibility hit because he is accepting money to do the commercial so that that puts you in a different category of credit woolly. So I wouldn't put that one on my list. However, a lot of people have read it and said they got good stuff out of it. So use your own judgement.

ego? Is the enemy by ryan holiday? Have you ever heard me say that ego is ego? Is the enemy you know where that comes from, and I think that came from me, but I dunno. Maybe there was somebody who said it before both, but by think that plato said that the stoics of it did they say it exactly that way. Ego is the enemy. Or do instead of aerosols on it now I'm sure that lots of people have said you should manage your ego, but did they actually say your ego? Is your enemy, because that's what I say or they do that is actually there, I was wonder if yo

Thirty years ago I heard that somewhere that I thought I invented it myself, because you really can't tell diogenes Jimmy Jones editor. I guess a lot of people said it all religious as it yeah, not as not as directly with those words. Alright, alright is the old idea. Of course it was only the phrasing of those questioning. Alright, ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the best livestream have seen in twenty twenty two probably will keep up the excellence tomorrow. You listen to me. What does that make you the smartest person in your family? For starters,

I'll say goodbye to youtube and talk to local subscribers more live now.