In hindsight, you wish they said our test shows it really worked alpha, but we don't think elfish last long. What do you think I that's what they should have said, because everybody who worked on these respiratory viruses, I believe every one of the new. That is it if, in fact, if it mutated, the vaccine would work, they were just hoping you would. There are sort of hoping that, if a din, if it didn't mutate too fast- and it didn't mutate too much- you might be well the you get some purchase on it, but that was motivated thinking that there was nothing to suggest that that was going to happen. That was just like optimism or something so for sure. We know that they told us things that were not true for sure. We,

Is there even in pharma, and the governments told us things that they should have known? They should have known were not true. That's where the crime is. If, if there is crime, that's where it would be, would you agree Or do you or do you believe that they all knew and they were just playing it for the money like hundreds of thousands of researchers were all in on it? There probably were a lot of people in on it, but I don't think alone. My assumption that they knew it would mutate one hundred percent of the people that I heard ever talk about. It said that all of them, they all do. They all knew because they've been trying for years to bank a vaccine and the reason it didn't work. It was always the same reason because it mutated right. They all knew that everybody in the business we we didn't know, maybe.

I think even I knew that thomas massey makes a good point, as you often those. So you know you can't see a vaccine maker because they have special protection. So if a company makes a vaccine here soon, if it goes wrong. But what if they tell you there may be a vaccine and it doesn't stop any transmission and they probably knew it. Is that a vaccine? I'd, say now, and so therefore I'd say: if has The vaccine than you can see them, you can see them twice once was. Is a vaccine, when is not once because, if somebody got harmed and they didn't have full information.

But the cdc apparently evolved their definition of a vaccine during the process. So if you Vaccine you couldn't be sued, but then they, it's something that wasn't protective of transmission and the definition said protective of transmission, so they changed the definition to match what I was doing, which was protecting people from bad outcomes and then what? If I didn't do that unless you that's the case, but what didn't so either thomas mercy as a real good argument that I would love to see taken to the supreme court? If, if if it's only legal, because it's a vaccine by definition, somebody the year colluding with yes colluding with the sea. They say,

if the people you colluding with change the definition, so you stay legal. Is that cool zat cool? I don't think so I think I want to see this framework worth level Obviously, if that's necessarily illegal sketchy as all hell, but I'd like to it. Well yeah I dunno. If lying is always illegal, though yeah by the time the vex arrived, the the original screen was already dying out. That is correct. I would like to reiterate something I say once in a while, but it's important again. I put this into the category of youthful de mastery. was everyone smart when they were young that what was by a genius until there are twenty five and then they turned them, I don't think so.

so? Why are we judge people by what they said in college so there there's another situation and I'm not gonna name a name. The reason I'm not gonna name a name. There's somebody getting in trouble for something is: the college is, I don't think it's fair, so don't even google. It do me a favor if you're really curious, who are you talking about? Who is this? Don't even google it, because we should not be judging people by what they did in college unless it's greta ripe cause. She was in college when she was worship at age, so without naming who it was or some some other person who said something super inappropriate. that may or may not have been in academic. You make your point kind of contexts, but it doesn't matter just wherever they said under the age of twenty five, just let it go.

if people never improved, then yes, you should judge them by what they said in college, but if you know that a hundred per cent of people or something close to it evolve, yet we evolve into something different might be, better might be worse but a different. So why would he judged suddenly today, by what a different person did you, his brain, wasn't developed anyway, I like to say that once in a while now, there's been a lot of negativity in the news- and I thought today, especially because it's friday, the thirteenth you needed some positivity. Would anybody like some positivity for because it's all this negative stuff yeah, you do so a medal and list pointed out earlier of some positively.

So on one hand the coven jabs are looks like they're going to be super, overpriced super overpriced. In the context of we already have inflation and then the shot these jabs are going to go to like four hundred percent, what they used to be etc, but on the plus side, parent. You don't need em, so it doesn't really matter what it costs. If you don't need it I'm not giving you medical advice, you're not going to medical advice me, I'm not tell you not to take it I'm just saying is literally true that the prices going of four hundred percent at the time that the utility is down about a thousand per se? If the price is going up as the

Usefulness is dropping like a rock, I dunno that that's entirely bad news. I don't care what it costs cause, I'm never going to get it back mentally. I like to ask your coach. Let me ask I'm going to talk to coach. Your coach What I like to do is based my decisions on the knowledge that I have and then, if, if the data changes or we learn more, sometimes I will modify my opinion to fit the new data which refuted by old opinion. Now I know that you call that flip flopping, back then walking back, but I'm a little bit curious how you play it when you have it, opinion, and then the information is updated. to show the your original opinion makes you look like a monkey

do you say to yourself. You know I was pretty comfortable, would look like a monkey. I think all I think I'll ride that horse monkey horse got two billion metaphors. but did you keep your opinion just to say, or do you say and and I'll bet you do, this coach, I feel like you're, this kind of person- I they do the kind of person who can went a fog of war where none of the data is reliable and you can have certainty from the first moment. and then basin are certainly it really. wouldn't matter how much the information changed. You can keep that sir. opinion because, You are certain even one. There is no information. So coaches are you plan.

Cause. You know there are a lot of us who are playing at the dumb old way, whereas the day the changes will update or opinions, but not you know, know, you've got a progressive kind of a club. kind of opinion where the change in the data should not have any difference to your opinion, you could. It is cheating, as somebody says, is cheating too, to update your opinion with new info, to do that right. Here's some more positively. if you have a son who a little bit your ram bumptious the old days. What can you do about it? Nothing I mean, I guess in the old old days you could like use corporal punishment, but you know you can't do that anymore

what can you do if you had a rambunctious and there's nothing you do, but now, on the plus side, you can legal, remove their balls, I'm no doctor, but I think that comes from them. That'll settle down a now. You can't remove their balls unless they want what you do right, even other children. This We get a vote, so you can't really go to your son and say hey as I was thinking of removing your balls and transitioning you to a woman because it'd be easier for me.

Now the kid my say: woe, I'm totally a boy and I have no interest whatsoever in transition, but here's the good part children can be hypnotize really easily is a real thing where, when you learn to be having this is one of the things you learn is children. You don't even have to work at it. You can say two sentences and making cannot loosely is varies, so you can convince your child. I really believe it: children's were of a blank slate, even just work out. So if here, if your son is to run bumptious, even though it be italy unethical, you could probably convince them to his balls removed. If you work at long last, the good news,

Here's! What good news things could be much worse. Things could be much worse. For example, you could live in canada. I mean it could be worse Yours number, four again in the context of inflation. Wouldn't you like to know there's some prices were coming down and they are there, for example, sentinel, because of supply and the supply is through the roof, so the price of sentinel totally reasonable and nobody nobody talks about that. That's good for inflation! I dont think when they calculate the inflation. They include the price of sentinel. If they did, I think look a lot better, a better bad news? Losers mortgages. Remember, one bad!

is used to be all there was on the news like if there was something bad, after then, you turn on the news. You look at all. It's like a firehose. All this bad is coming at me, but now fully. Fifty percent of all the bad political news is suppressed. Lesson of great you'll have to your half of the bad news, It's all about republicans, but all of the bad news about Democrats suppressed. You never have to see it, and that feels good. That's like a it's better than that Andrew huberman, breathing technique. It just makes you feel good. And then, of course, some of you were worried about some of our national secrets getting you're. The moral logger mara logo and maybe maybe those national seekers might get out so but these days.

Much better situation, so we now have moral I'll go now we have car a logo, Carl logger, those jesse wonders joke, was pretty good Carl logo and our nation secrets are safe in bins. Next do were jos corvette in his grudge. So that's a lot of good news and people, though report the good news. I feel that it, sir that's good. Now. I do think that the headlines are all organic or do you think that we're always being played? What do you think? Do you think our headlines are organic or we always being played you're, always being played that, because the headlines could be anything there lie,

it's about any politician who could be positive or negative could be edited. So whoever chooses the headlines, yeah they're they're, presenting a narrative. Interestingly, Here's a pro vaccine story, but not about covered not about covered, so digital. Has a pro vaccine story about the hpv vaccine which they say has been a big part: Dropping? U s cancer mortality by by britney's, bigger amount like down by third or something and its because the vaccine! Do you see it. let me ask you this. Would there have been a pro vaccines story if we were not questioning the vaccination spoke of it is the interest

that'll? Be this totally unrelated story? The just it just happens to highlight the magical abilities of vaccinations at just the time that the public is starting to question the value of the cool vaccinations. The wall street journal has a nice pro vaccination story, just a quizzes, maybe maybe, but Maybe that is plausible. That is a coincidence that is plausible, but in today's environment is a little harder to assume. That is the case, but I'm glad cancers them there's been a special especial elsa lisbon exit named. We will look into the the news that,

Joe Biden has a bunch of a bunch of several cases of confidential information to for sure, maybe some third one isn't it a special council will look into that. My biggest problem with the special council is, I don't know this person's pronouns as a little confused. because the person's name is rubber, her spelled age you are, I think, is pronouns or him and her age. You are this way I'd go go is my pronouns or him in her. Then this how it go, but we don't know And I also ask myself if a robber, her mary dead, Then came the sister. I don't know if he has a cistern, I don't offer lessening would begin if she single what's funny,

go with us and they haifa daily, the names and the kids. They would be a hurricane regain, and I wonder what would be the the funniest first name to go further. With a last name of hurricane osage, you Wendy Wendy. How's. That hurricane was pretty windy, very windy out there in their rookie or how about ima yeah, I'm a I'm. A hurricane yeah killer, storm, stormy, stormy hurricane. They have stormy, Daniels, stormy, hurricane camille, yeah, okay, kansas, I don't think betsy's. Why do people say betsy? Is that funny. Her or weld rubber hers look into it,

and so that should take care right. The good news is that an objective purse it has been put in jars so that we can what he's not what oh corner to care. patel rubber? Her is a quote swamp monster. who was involved with the russia collusion oaks, literally, the worst person in the world to be in charge fits the worse purse. Ok now the left says, This person was appointed by trump, this sort of normal to have lower level people approved by a president and the president. no idea who they are. They could be the other party.

It's lower level people it doesn't matter, does it isn't uncommon for people to get nominated? Who are not necessarily your same party? So I don't think that means anything, but it does look like the fixes in and he looks like he'll be the This do you remember. I was telling you that it looks like the Democrats who are trying to take by now. With this document thing. Do you remember me saying that. and I even put hashtag conspiracy theory, because when I said I thought, okay. I know I'm going a little too far here, so I called it out as my own conspiracy theory and then I turned on Tucker carlson and he says directly. He just says it directly.

So it does look like the Democrats who tried to date by now. It actually does look like that. Now, that doesn't mean is true, but that I partners is fixed everything we see the other eye. Policies is just businesses normal, so the other possible, but I asked this I can documents be fingerprinted when she wants to know who touch those confidential documents when she liked now, and doesn't that makes a big difference. What a, what if you see a hunter's fingerprints, one, that's a problem! Do you think hunter's fingerprints will be on any of those documents.

I dunno there. There was a reason that they were not where they were supposed to be, maybe as an accident, maybe not we'll see, but but here's what I would look for if they do not fingerprint the documents, the fixes. And what can you agree on that? If they don't have fingerprint documents, then you can know for sure that it's just a cover up operation if they do fingerprint them. If you still wonder if. Will do the truth, but if they do fingerprint them and they find you know hunters fingerprints on them, then I'd be willing. You know, just as one example could be somebody else, but I'd be.

Willing to say. Oh that looks like they might actually be serious about this, which would also suggest the Democrats are out to get rid of Biden. Here's my take on Biden. I think that Biden was helped into his election by lots of powerful people behind the scenes, and then he came to believe that the job was his and it was totally up to him whether he runs for reelection. So he said, yeah go run for reelection. I don't believe that the people who installed him are necessarily on the same team. I think they might need to take him out because he's old man who just claims you should stay so you I that even see in earnest this scene and is treating the binding documents like us

important as more logo and is the top story essentially to top story and anti democratic story? She then stopped story. Does that mean the cnn has successfully prevented the middle, at least on the story, or does it mean that were the signal is that they Democrats led to get rid of binding It doesn't mean they had a meeting and they colluded could be just every based on the same page. So they all know what to do. It does, is a little bit suspicious. I would expect sea and then to do a whole bunch more of minimizing it and they're, not there actually maximizing. So it doesn't look like the fixes in baghdad.

Necessarily there's not much to be said about the fact that the documents worthy grudge poured next to a car, and we can make all the jokes about secure. That was, it wasn't whatever. Here's a story that might be fake, but it might be fake and also tell sounds so I'm gonna say the odds of this being true or low, but the odds of it meeting something important are very high and what I saw was just one social media account, as was not it's, not the regular news. So at the moment the regular news is now reporting. This, so may not be true

but there are wagner soldiers who videotaped what they claim are captured ukrainian drones that are clearly else in it for chemical warfare, meaning they have tanks on them. That, obviously, are meant to hold a a chemical or a gas that they wouldn't have any other reason to be there and there's a bunch of them. It's like a room full of drones, small ones that have been modified to carry some kind of a gas canister. Now the wagner group claims that they've been used Now here's the thing: do you believe the wagner group now now now you shouldn't believe everything that comes out of ukraine, but the only thing, I wonder where the drones real? Do you think they faked it?

by making a whole room full of drones that the canisters attached cause. That would be a lot a lot of work if you're a good. If you are planning to fake it, how many do you need Indeed, one you literally just need one, because it would be just as convincing as rueful. Because if you saw One- and you believed it was real you'd think there were more, you would never believe there was only one. So if it were fake, they only need to show you one now. I believe it is fake, but maybe not for the reasons that the jones are not real. It could be shake in the sense that is Wagner's own drones, it could be that the Wagner group is the one with making the gas drones and says they're definitely going to get caught, what they did was say: oh look at these ukrainians. So if you ever see one the first time you ever find one other. You know that

asked you go say all the way through the borders, but this these are those ukrainian drones. So this could be the wagner group getting in front of the story they I was going to break the sooner or later, somebody's going to find a drone with a canister on it and so they're making the case that it's the other guys before it happens. That's what it looks like, but there's a bigger question. If those Drones are real and again I don't know why you have so many of them. If you fake it, you don't need a money, as it would be a weird when a faggot

if those are real, that's what's coming, and you know my book, the religion of war, written in two thousand and three, I think predicted. This is predicted based on the following technology predictions that drones would be widespread and and hobby sized that you know, regular people could get a drone that could do a lot of stuff so that I predicted in two thousand and three that came true. The other thing I predicted is that, because the drone won't be able to carry a lot of weight, it's going to want to use weapons that don't weigh much and the ultimate weapon that doesn't weigh much is gas, so it almost is almost guaranteed.

Somebody's gonna use these for your crop, dusty, their enemies so common? Yet whether these are real and not the stuff? We come. and what do you think would be our response if, if our homeland were attacked by chemical weapons and drones, unless they had more than once looked like there was nothing we can do to stop at what would we do? What would the States do if we knew the drones were coming from a specific country and they just kept coming. Imagine what that would do to our cities, like people wouldn't go indoors, they stop commuting, I'm you would you,

wreak havoc. There's only one thing we did, we would pay for that country and that's what my book was about. We will in all likelihood there will be drones that terrorists use with chemical weapons in all likelihood and if they do it more than once, and it becomes like a pattern, we won't be able to find the specific terrorists, probably we're going to just take out the whole country, and we we just might not have any other choice because we wouldn't be able to live with it and we will do whatever it took and it would be-

thought it would be pure genocide. So that's what that's the setup in the book. The book is: what happens when genocide is the only solution? What happens when is the only solution? I have to use our solution because that, for obvious reasons, but do you think that that's likely do you think it's likely that they'll, that kind of

Weapon will come to our shores in numbers, and is it likely that we would respond in any other way than just eliminating buildings in the country? We would just make sure everybody had to live outdoors. I think we just eliminated yeah, we get it, we get, it isn't genocide. If it's self defense yeah, it would be because it would be genocide against ninety nine point: nine, nine, nine, nine percent innocent people depends on the president, and I don't think so so that that's the hard part. I don't think it depends who's in charge, because they'll only have one choice. Eventually, that's not woke sending those robot soldiers

Alright, that's enough, for today I gotta go, do something else I think you'd agree. This is the best live stream you've seen so far today, and it's only going to get better. I remember The thing that you've been told is backwards, including friday, the thirteenth it's a good luck day. It's a good luck day, go out and get yourself some good luck and bye for now youtube. I'm going to talk to those subscribers for a little bit on locals because are special bye for now.