Good morning, everybody I welcome tonight neither civilization it's called coffee was got out. It was the finest things have happened. And today we have intrigue and fake news and all kinds of good stories. It's going to be a good one and if you'd like to enjoy with the maximum amount of oxytocin and all it has chemicals, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or jealous of stein, the canteen, jug or flask of us LUCA and fill it with your favorite liquid, like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled place the dover media the day thing that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now go yeah. That was good. That was good dopamine. I feel the rush good

stuff. Well, those I feel good story in Houston. Do you mind if I start with the feel good stories you like, like like a nice, warm fuzzy, feeling you don't get too we going after knowledge. warm fuzzy, so there was a local a career in Houston. Where a thirty year old, the gentleman robbed all the patrons. So he took out a gun and pointed it at all the patrons and made them hand over their wallets and stuff Did I mention this was Houston. There was somebody who decided that right fishing. A gun in a public area in Houston would would turn out. Ok, So there was a patron who is armed. Did I imagine it was used

there was a patient who is armed who shot the intruder, which apparently is legal still illegal, because the guy was brandishing a gun like saying brandishing, he was brandishing all over a man whose brandishing use brandishing like crazy, this delegation, but the part of the story is that Show them like nine times including when he was down and that he dumped is dumped as beverage item before he left. Then you just let us now there's some suggestion that he actually was guilty of a crime because the thinking Is that once he had neutralised Lee attacker, there was no reason to do in the additional shooting.

I would like to present his defence for him. If I may hear now, the defence for the person who shall nine times and dumped is beverage on number one. I'm not a doktor, I dont know if somebody can get up from a particular kind of injury deal So far beyond the put me on the witness stand right after you shot once monthly went down and they and the day, there was no. Why did you keep shooting, to which I say One another doctor: I don't what kind of injury somebody can take and not be able to fight back is a yes, but here they took the gun away from other enough. That's true, but let's say the gun you may be felt Don't take then I'd say well off dunno if he has another one. Do you know here? another gun. I didn't know out another. Why would I take that chance.

Is obviously guy this boy's guns of people, and I just shot him another ganum, the undead. So why would I take that chance. so you're saying that my my risk was over when he went down, and I say that's for me to decide. That's for me to decide you don't get it. Do you don't get to decide my risk if there's a guy who shoots people and uses guns and robs people just because I saw one, if his guns was no less inaction, I dont know what else we can do that. I don't know how many times have you heard a story about the the guy who got shot six times and still attack somebody lots of dubs because the other an auto some kind of weird drug or something? But that's the thing I'll say? If you tell me, I'm supposed to be an expert on military. injuries how's that reasonable.

No, I have one job which is keep myself safe and the other patrons, and I made sure I got a dumb what's wrong with making sure you're safe, What one is the percentage of safety that you believe is appropriate to me? How much safety should is my safe based on your assessment of my safety, my assessment of my safety, the one that matters in this situation britishers mine pressure. so you're only the argument. Nobody can tell you what your risk is when you are in the moment. Here's, the other thing I would say if it's true there might be true, I didn't even know. I shall nine times. Literally did, even though it. Because in the moment, I'm not some kind of train policemen, Not in the military, I saw a threat

I pulled my gun and honestly, I don't even know what happened in the next ten seconds because it was just fog of war. My my brain was on fire. I'll just like my brain was on fire. I barely remember what happened. Did it? nine times you'll originally now ask us when I pulled the trigger the tenth time there was. No, no bullets were some like that. So. I don't see how it could possibly be convicted do if he had a good attorney if he has a bad antonius was anything spots or bad jury. The lash I was in the head. Doesn't change that I would say if you can't be sure you can be sure it wasn't. This problem solved well, I reparations pale in San francisco was tasked with coming up with a suggestion of what reparation should be

I think that those in earlier report, they came up with some number like two hundred thousand per black person recently in california, and this group came up with a different number and five million per black person. That's a recommendation, five million per black person. Now the total budget of the city of san francisco is fourteen billion a year and the recommendation is to spend fifty billion on reparations, which each san francisco black person, who has been black for at least ten years. Yet you have to You- have to be black for at least ten years. People have only been black for like say three to five years: nothing, so I've only been black for I dunno, maybe eight years. So I get nothing you get nothing.

Black for like eight years so, but this is why you know I've been teaching you. This is why you start early because they put that ten year thing, I'm only about two years away from qualifying five billion dollars, free money right. Well, I've been planning way ahead so two years from now, if this comes up, I'm going to say I got my ten years him, but I guess you have to prove it with government documents. That'll be a little harder. The committee also propose wiping out all debts associated with educational. Personal cars payday loans for black households, so the fifth number panel was established by the san Francisco supervisors, so Let me give you a suggestion for how to make bad ideas go away. You tell them to form a committee and get real specific about what it is or asking

because then is easy to ignore it does it'll, be so ridiculous. So this is the same. Then they govern loosened in their apparently. There was at least two panels So I gave a news that a panel they came back with that call a million dollars that was impractical to. I think that was always the play. A noose unplaited come plainly right, He took it seriously in the sense that they formed a committee to make a recommendation and then gave them attention. That seems perfectly fair and then once attention than they showed you what's? The idea was it was completely impractical problem solved. So I don't think that if you want to watch out for is a newsom as it is a strong player like if you don't like his politics, I get as blah blah blah, but don't overlook the fact he he has game. Alright, he can become the

I see that was one more reports that china has more deaths than burst. This year, Oh, there is something like in very rough numbers: ten million deaths and nine million some births, so presidents she actually wants to boost the population of china. How many have you had that? on your predictions of many of you were protected. You know, I think china's gonna really want to increase their their population. that would have been hard to predict with it, but I think peters, saying saying that they probably have been decreasing population for fourteen years or so that the problem has been lying about. Their data, and all the rest,

Say that it's a demographic time bomb- and you won't be enough young people's to support all the old people fairly soon as problem, so it's gonna, take well to convince everybody that population growth isn't the problem that prosperity actually solves that, so you just do prosperity right and your biggest problem is not enough. People, the united states, do be a fact checker this I thought I saw this, but I don't have the source right here. I thought I saw that last year the united states population would have decreased if not for

immigration, including illegal, is that true was the population of the united states not going to grow, or would it slightly decrease, except for immigration can be a fact check on that? That, I think, is true, but here's what I think I should do before twenty twenty four and thirty of creating a series of maybe like you're one minute, videos in which played a policy position that would work for everybody there's a lot of these things. Have policy positions that nobody has staked out the both the Democrat and Republican would totally agree with. I think I your here's, how I would do it if I were let's say I'm trump and I want it

I to avoid all the you, the border racism questions. If I'm trump I say ellis, do this less! For me, economic board, who decides who to let in under what circumstances that benefits the economy of the united states the most and make sure that board is super diverse. Who says? No to that? We really if he graces super diverse board, of actual economists and the economy to say it out. I think we should let in people this year than doubt or if they say we should lead in five million, because otherwise we have a shrinking population

and even though it's a burden on our systems, we're still better off, you know, hypothetically, I'm not saying they would say that, but but whatever they say, because I think I think that the decision should be offloaded to economists and they should be a diverse group of economists who don't worry about the racial stuff and, and they should just say we think the country is better off with this level and then just managed to that level. Who's who says no to that right? Who says now now, if somebody would find some reason to complain about something, but is way better than what other, what the Democrats or doing, which is nothing, and what? What trump will?

suggests, which will sound too harsh right. Why? Why do we want to choose between basically nothing open borders? You know I, I know it's not technically open borders, but you know what I'm versus somebody who's going to get everybody mad, that it sounds racist, wise. Why are those are choices? Anybody could just choose the smarter one instead of having the congress decide that many people Man, which is dumb, do what we do. When we do budgets, you have the the was the o m b sort of somewhat objectively scores. Your budgets and says, is as good or bad just At how many people, how many people argue with the o m b lately I mean it happens, but I feel, like that's, become a credible least credible feelings system led by no gates. No, I dunno what is

our on immigration. Exactly right. Well, that's my suggestion. Seaboard talk about the Biden residents, not having guess logs and certain fit and say that if the Yes, the secret service is doing his job. There has to be visitor logs, to which I asked the question. That too is a tool that the secret service, The log of everybody who comes in because didn't we learned that the way house did not keep a gas log during the trumpet administration, they had one and then the government? How could it be true, They got rid of the white house. Log. Wall would also be true that the secret service would keep a log of everybody visit, which sounds reasonable seems reasonable.

and then somebody suggested that they did background checks of everybody of business or president? Do you think's up? Do you think they really do background checks of everybody who visits present? You do. I am not entirely sure you might be right, I mean, is the bureaucracies, and maybe they just do it. could be as just the rule and do all that, but When I visited the white house I gave them my name and information probably gave them. My social security number probably. probably, I think, I'd give them. My driver's license some point either before when I checked in the garret member label,

so they could certainly do a a quick digital check. They can check government government records, but nobody, nobody talked to me and nobody. Nobody talked to relatives or nobody talked to my close associates or anything like that. So I will check that they really do and then here's the question if they see a name on the the listeners public figure than they really jack, really like it. If, when Kim kardashian was invited to the white house, did they do a background check on her the most transparent person, the planet but probably it was perfunctory. Don't you think same with me? Do you think it was just perfunctory? I've never said that love that word outlet.

I waited my whole life to say perfunctory. I think I know that means you have just sort of going through the motions. Yeah, I don't think that anybody even like looked at it. I think they just probably type my name into the system, something spit out and they said, go ahead. so. I guess we have some interesting questions about whether they have a list and how much they actually check licence It is unless you're a complete unknown like a like a citizen who did something famous, I'm sure they check all the normal citizens. That makes sense. I don't think they check as much if you're a public figure, because I think you just mean there's not any real surprises Public figures so mccarthy kept his promise to try to work. Build a castle, the funding of the eighty seven thousand new iris employees that we're trying to be heard

and it looks like this popular sixty four percent of publicans are in favour of cancelling it, but even fifty two percent of democrats and affiliated not a failure, voters so a solid majority of every type of voter. Well, fifty two percents, not that solid, but a majority I don't want it and Mccarthy has fallen through now yeah. I guess it still goes to the senate. Who knows if that's. I would like to hear an inspirational story. Anybody it's even better than the houston shooting. Now the people on the locals platform heard this, but I'm going to add a detail that you'd in hear and it's a fun detail is worth it. So don't turn out because you ve earned it

So, who yesterday is planning to go to starbucks, do some work. My cars in the shop is either Bmw, so It always has a sunday morning, light on or another in the shop. course. It always goes in the shop and a three day weekend. Of course, of course, I don't bring it in on the friday, but got extended until three day. We can- So I call the mover over shows up and it's it's a tassel. and I realized I'd, never opened a tesla harder and it's got the door handles lay flat with the door itself,

the sub standing outside luber and I'm like uh, unlike a monkey with a coconut, tried to open this car of like ooh ooh, ooh ooh, and you know that the driver sees that I'm struggling and boomer. Yes, you can say boomer totally appropriate under the circumstances. Now to be clear, I've been in a few teslas. I have ridden them before, but I can't remember ever opening the door. I think maybe the door was opened or something I dunno, but I've narrowed. So anyway, I finally figured out how to push it becomes out. I opened the door so get in. the door in the the driver jokes with me, and he jokes this way, gus. You know elon musk, he doesn't make these car. He doesn't design these cars for the common people like us.

Because I think he just macy's cars were like me. A geniuses is something so everybody s trouble in the card or we can figure them so we're laugh and about isla must design in this car that I cant figure how to get into society? Young hispanic spanish driver told me was twenty six years old and where he lived said to Stockton, but he likes to likes to drive now. Stockton, if you don't know California is, higher crime, lower income place, it's sort of not that not an ideal place to be an uber driver. You'd want to go. Better neighbourhood, but one of the reasons he goes to my neighborhood is that we're just its original road, so we're just full of sea owes tech rose and just successful people of all kinds and so he drives and then every- and he explicitly has this strategy

he has been reading motivational books and stuff and he had a tough childhood. I guess his mom was a drug drug addict and high crime, and you know just the worst situation. Poverty Add he was, he was gonna, be the one who made it out, so he figured out Having become a little, the driver and an strategy was his system. This system, was the drive where be exposed to successful people, and his theory was that that exposure whatever variety of benefits which would help him in his usual is race to the top. So we're chatting way now total. This in your mind here somebody who's strategy was to try to meet the right people who could help him.

and of all the people in the whole world- eight billion people in the world. There wasn't anybody better for him to be in that car than me. Now I know I know what you're get to say: oh my god, the ego and this man now I'm just this exactly my job. My precise exact job is giving career and success advice to exactly people like him. You know my book to fail is probably of the most influential book in that genre. At the moment, eight billion people on earth- and I got news Now everybody was saying, braggart and ego. I do this intentionally to find out who were the weak people to get rid of it. You can't even handle the conversation.

There's no way to tell the story without saying it's. The truth is there's probably nobody better on the planet. Then me at this very narrow thing lots of things on bad at that you're better than I am not saying, I'm better, the you I'm saying this Very narrow thing is what I do: It's like somebody asked I'm not going to make that comparison, I'll get mutual. So I tell this story on twitter. I tell the story about the young man whose system was to meet people and that he was lucky enough to meet me, and I I left both cryptically right. This is true, as I was leaving the car a starbucks. I said you dont know yet, but this is the luckiest day of your life,

Now, by that, I've already told them what my book was and who I was, and we talk a little bit about the whole john rather self help etc. So you do where I fed into the the ecosystem, but the story is not over. I tweet about this and I told a story about how this young man came from bad circumcision. I was using a system to meet people at work that he met me. Elon musk seized my tweet. Our response to his strategy of media being where the successful people are an elon musk tweets in reply. He is right. Just hold this demand for a moment. This is the model of the world that I have that some people are players and some people are embassies. the other person who, as a model is eleven months, were

seems as our inner simulation and p Like you, I was sort of author dissimulation for ridiculous outcomes. I believe it is well- and I believe I have also routinely change reality in ways that just defile logic so, if we're not assimilation, I dont have a better explanation of what's going on. This young over driver had a very clear intention to move the universe he wanted to nudge. The universe through his own success

I got in his car, against all odds, all odds. He makes a joke about elon musk, not wanting to deal with us. You busk tweets a confirmation of this kid's twenty six years old com account of this kid's system, invalidates your validated system now I don't have a way to contact them, because you know uber's of first name, because I think he might contact me someday. You know just a follow up if he reads workers or something and I'll. Let him know the you all connected us and lead another story, but why? when elon musk was a hundred and twenty five billion followers, etc.

Happens when he validates a success strategy that you being round successful people helps you succeed is present this kid actually moved the universe from his over car. without knowing it sunday that gives a player is a player though the only thing I know for sure is not an NBC. Does he moves the universe little that just a nudge, but he did that set the coolest story of her today. Certainly A lot of one hundred and twenty six million people saw it, but that was your inspirational story for day spigot vila musk oil between it. About the w e f- and I said this

scuttle skeptical of anything that can be explained the sentence, what exactly, do they do and why I ever thought of that is a good standard for detecting bullshit. If somebody kids, blame their situation or what they offering where the product, the sentence is a scam. Now, the first time you hear that you say that can't be true. There must be plenty of legitimate things that are a little hard. Explain nope, no there or not, no legitimate things that are hard to explain now, you'll never find one The only things are arduous plainer, sketchy things, sketchy things are Spain, because you don't want to say the truth, so ask anybody who is proud world economic forum? What are they do and why and they watch what happens is could be word salad.

Well, we like to bring together the future leaders to coordinating the communication of the synergies then the world to be moving in a way that is compatible with the future of both the technology and freedom and equality and will also have the racism and save the world because of climate each and all the good things and leaders of year community right now, I'm totally serious we need to get them on record. Saying what is this thing and why is it wise as exist or do I send my bunny. so so after I said, I'm scared, I'm skeptical of anything that can be explained to the sentence. Then he let you

school was looking the same video and he responded, as Klaus schwab sounds like a bond villain. You all know that right. I can't not the first persons, That do you know who else says that close schwab, the head of the world economic forum? Do you know who else says he sounds like a bond villain. Everybody who hears everybody Everybody like we all thought of it. At the same time as is, is that a is that the head of spectre? I think, that's! I had a spectre like everybody same time, so that's never a good look. I never good luck, but you know in his defense. Klaus schwab is a swiss economists, slash engineer.

So a swiss economist, slash engineers are not exactly mister charisma go so he's got that working against him, but he talked about the the the w F and need to quote master. Future, which alone must said master the future Doesnt zone ominous at all, And then he says: how is the w e f slash, Davos, even the thing they trying to be the boss of earth? Now, that's. My point is well right like you learn. Moscow is a master of the universe. Lace is one of the people whose figured it out He's is invited to the w e F and turned it down, causes other boring, as he said,. He doesn't know what they do like what I want. What's up, that's what you want exactly you're trying to do here now. You tell me

if elon musk, who is invited to it, can't figure out why they do what they do. Are they just trying to be the boss of earth? You should worry about that right now that that's basically another way to say, if you can't explain it in a sentence, is sketchy now by by any objective reasonable consideration. Are they not trying to inject their influence between the the citizens of a country and the government. that part would be confirmed by both people programme, cod right that that is a description there. There inserting themselves between the leadership of a country and the citizens.

Who in the world would agree to that who in the world would say yes to let the factors nonprofit means little. It just seems like crazy thing to be in favour of. So I asked if there's any kova master list on twitter. I asked of people. Well at least americans who are attending so we can know all who all the dumb people are. Doesn't that feel useful? Wouldn't you have to like have a master list of who is gullible enough to go to this thing. Well turns out. There are quite a few of american politicians, both republican and Democrat, so it's totally bipartisan. That looks like four republican governors, kirsten cinema somebody said Joe mansion. I didn't didn't see his name on the list, but I don't I dunno, if that's true fb yeah christopher wray, the r F b I director

the debate, we have seriously our f b, I director is attending the organization that wants to get between government and the people. What could be worse than that like these should be fired for that? I think the EU should be fired for them, like actually fire for that is that wrong. I think attending that is such a bad look for the f b. I such a bad look that that's disqualifying I mean that would be similar to just taking his dick out and and like pissing on congress. To me I mean maybe it's not technically illegal, but I think you should get fired for it. I was probably approved by somebody above him, so that's different, but I don't have,

for that whatsoever, but anyway it's nice to have less the code monkeys eve who's back on twitter. Do you remember the code monkeys? He is back on twitter. He had to Must I think everybody on the list should be asked in public to explain what the w e f is and why they added whoops as a spirit there from it. So I think everybody on the on the american list of attendees yeah ron, walker, walk ins is the name behind code monkeys. He and some say he's: he was beyond Q. I dunno, if that's confirmed or not it is, is the name they most often say anyway.

I saw a tweet by robert minor today and I didn't know how to comment on it, because it's now indistinguishable from thirty, I looked at it and I swear. I couldn't tell if he was joking, because he keeps saying that you know. Biden has been proven as all honest, unlike trump, and I think you couldn't possibly be looking at the news or looking at the same news. I, yup and even even most said the you said talking about somebody else mentioned she somebody tweeted is you saying I should stay away from trashing Biden because I'll see more rob, reiner and Keith Olbermann tweets. The context here was musket tweeted, if you interact with an account you don't like the twitter algorithm, will give you more accounts. You don't like.

And then he laughed because you didn't think that was the silly mistake and I agree if you enjoyed interaction with an account you didn't like. Why wouldn't give you more of those enjoy that you spend time on it. So as a as a weird little kink of the algorithm. That will give you what you don't want, because sometimes you want what you don't want. It's like a confusing little situation, so Musca called that out or- and there was agreement tweet, so talking about rob writer and keys overman's tweets musk says: is it even possible to parity their tweets I'm just literally wondering right now, if it's even possible totally agree. like actually literally no joke no hyperbole, I dont know if you can do it I saw a parody account today that it took me ten minutes to decipher than it was apparently.

Like I, I really couldn't tell. I had to look pretty deep in the tweet stream like this could be just the Democrats and then finally, I saw interacting with the Michael Knowles and in that like gave away the parody, but at first I actually couldn't tell it was way over the top. But still you get all so, if you have it, This thread is just required is another other glitch. This is just a required thread. Now

I require you to do anything. But I would suggest that if you don't see the I tweeted a thread by kenneth cole or the great who has a sub stack as well by his tweet threads are just outrageously good, like better than anything you're. Seeing in the news, I don't know how like what his background is, or I don't really anything about it. But the work is. Oh, my god is better than using in terms of really describing the situation is reporting on I know about this, but earlier in the day the us department of health, when security they outsource censorship of the internet, platforms to the election integrity partnership, which was comprised of four organizations. Okay, let me stop here.

Can I go on the great correctly uses the word comprised you almost never see that most people would say it was composed of four resolutions, which is actually improper uses. The correct word is comprised of that's actually attack. For some loose operating, at least a higher level of writing talent, and probably that that spills over into his reasoning, ability so of organizations and safer internet observatory, the university of washington, it's a centre for an informed public. What else that the atlantic councils, digital forensic research lab and somebody called graphic I do see- let's go,

and they're laundering the censorship through like organizations, so it is going to look legitimate because they can say these organizations, but it also be so complicated this hard to figure out. What's going on sort of a perfect cover, the cup complexity and they said that the ip clean every quote repeat spreader of election. This information was on the right. What everyone or the repeat, sweaters of information according to the sensors, are all on the right. Everyone? There are very few things that are that completely binary, and this is in one

Obviously there are plenty of tweets of Hillary Clinton and Democrats stacy abrams questioning election, but all of the review offenders. All of them were on the right now. Here's my question. Is that tell you that they were simply political that they knew what they were doing. They knew they were just being political. That's it was because otherwise, how do you explain a hundred per cent of all the bad guys begun on one side according to them? Well,. I'm going to propose that there's at least one by other possibility. There is one other possibility that they believed it that they believed it. Because the left actually believes everything the left says is actually true. They actually believe it

So when they look at it they say well, it looks like one hundred percent on this side. That is, I sincerely purely political. It me. Actually be that they believe it. And by the way that wouldn't even be unusual, that would require no leap of logic, noble giving in something on scientific. It would be the way to normal people act. You don't think you can get a bunch of republicans in a room to say that the only people lying are the are the Democrats. Of course you would they be acting only politically nope. No, they would actually believe it right. If you put a bunch of republicans a room, they would say a whole bunch of conspiracy theories What they believe are just facts and they would say that those other guys are just spewing garbage. The truth is both sides have a healthy dose of conspiracy theories and bullshit

but if only one side is doing the fact checking you got a real big problem and that's what category? The great is calling out in great detail, so he's got all the receiver instead, he shows it in a way that I just recommend that you look at the details. The the big picture is that our government was definitely involved in censorship in a big way, in an important way that probably influenced elections probably and that they use these cut outs. If you want that's, probably the wrong term, but they use these organizations that are not terribly credible to me anyway to you know, to make this happen, confusing and give us some laundered legitimacy. So twenty two million tweets were label misinformation, none of them on the left, so the left has got a good record,

there are twenty two million to zero point. Twenty two billion deserve. our aid, this next segment. I call backwards science backward science, the people who get cause and effect backwards or might- So do you gonna give you two situations in which is entirely possible that the interpretation is accurate? Maybe the cause and effect is exactly what they say, but you decide number one There is new study that says going for a walk in the park. We're along a lake or a tree line spaces, basically a nature that doing some extra cash in nature. they reduce the need for medication. Is rang society, asthma, depression, high blood pressure, as in or insomnia that physical activity,

is sought to be the key mediating factor when you're out in these green spaces. So as not just being there is being active out there. and the study found that visiting nature three to four times a week. Associated with way associated with. They didn't really use the word causation, those s as disassociated with. So associated with thirty six. lower odds of using blood pressure pills. Thirty three. Lowering of using mental health medications and twenty six percent lower as of using asthma medications. Now let me ask you this question: if you divide the world into people who are already healthy and people who are now they, which one of those do more hiking do the. On the whole they people do as much. Hiking is a healthy people, because

I wouldn't have to do any science whatsoever to determine the people who go hiking. Wealthier than people who don't I don't need any science to tell me that either. Why? Because unhealthy people don't like healthy people, do is probably backward science, don't you think just healthy people go hiking is not the hiking people makes you healthy. Now, of course, hiking makes you healthier. What let me be clear that there's no question whatsoever. It works both ways right. We know it works both ways for sure it works both ways, but don't you think the bigger factor is that healthy people can hike and unhealthy people can get off the couch. I'm just go put out. Another possibility do another one. There is a report- animal australia and the united to believe this, but

People who are healthy, don't go to the doctors and die nearly as often as people are super unhealthy. Did you know that less what the israelis figured out, that healthy people live longer, an unhealthy people now then said that why they sent a little differently said, was that the people at the most vaccinations and boosters were the only ones die. Literally the only ones who was like a subset of one thousand something people, so it wasn't the biggest study in the world yeah. So I think you'd need confirmation, but they found that zero in the period that they looked at this region,

Zero on vaccinated people died in the hospital from go with zero, not a single on vaccinated person. Who do you think a vaccinated? The most? Was it the people with no call more opportunities. who looked perfectly healthy and set themselves, I'm perfectly healthy and were already in the age of COMECON. If I haven't got action by now it would you may be unwise to do so because on the crimes, It'll hurt me. I just ran a marathon, or are you more likely to vaccinated if your four hundred pounds and you have diabetes, I dunno, I think, you're more likely to get vaccinated if you're, unhealthy, so Jimmy all approved as that on healthy people die and healthy people do not. The

the possibility is that the jabs are killing people which one is. Would you agree that they're both possible? Are they both possible that the the only explanation is the jabs are killing you or the or maybe the most explanation is that healthy people didn't get vaccinated? Probably both probably both do you know, I say probably both because we know vaccinations are dangerous to some people, so if you've got one thousand people- well, probably probably maybe one of them, I know not, probably because I think I don't think one in one thousand are being killed,

by vaccination is not one of the thousands that'll be too much, but you know you could imagine if you'd looked at one thousand people you'd get maybe one or two who knows, and I can also imagine if it's you I'm reasonably healthy, but I didn't tolerate the first two shots at all like the kick, as if the shot itself kick your ass, your already near death, I'm not too surprised if it kills. People too would without surprise. You is the virus, kill you you all about you, but I felt just a sick with a sharp, as I did, with a virus. The shot was before on the ground

But when I got armagh run, it kicked my ass, but about the same as the shot did it wasn't that much difference? So, if you can, if you can take out an old person with just a little bit of arma cron, which is happening, why wouldn't the vaccination take them out and if it feels just as aggressive, is a different way. I just put it out there, so I want to be very clear for the clappers. I would be worried about this data yeah. The this is definitely a flag. You should look, but you guys, I always you doctor Mccullough he's always It was on this correlation causation claims and. He could easily turn out to be right about everything as well within the realm of possibility, but he consistently treats the this kind of study like there's. Only one explanation

There is at least to at least two there might be more, which is your bad data. That data would be the other explanation. Well, somebody they say Scott was shilling, prove acts in my opinion. What is your opinion have to do, then? Why does obey care about your opinion amusing wrong? Obviously, why? What do we care Is as long as you says, your opinion does as a fact right. If you say it's a fact. Well, then I'd have to bury you, but if you says your opinion, that's one amiss an uninformed opinion based on sketchy data. Probably, but opinions are fine. All right, I saw you twitter user eliza, who is eliza blue,

who is a notable anti trafficking advocate so does does important good work of advocacy for groups need it. The traffic people pedophiles its victims, pedophilia so very kind. oh person, doing good work, but she asked this question. She said the honest question: what happened? where matter- buying into these Elsa male scams- now she didn't say andrew date, I feel like she might have been lilies. Thank you a little bit so honest question: what happened where men are buying into these l famille scams and then. he said what can I do as a woman too,. A man. No. That is not the move, at least not for me, it's not attractive energy in the slightest. And people that a lot of replies- but I was I know

This one from jason Andrews was evidenced by the way at persuasion. Rising is his account if you like to follow hypnotists and he responded. This is pretty savage. Now I don't participating I'll, tell you my opinion moment, but it was so savage. I just had to read it because the first but she said honest question by the war, and he says no, on his person, who could have lived through the last twenty to thirty years? be aware of white men? Do this men jewels, you couldn't possibly of lives, lost what it's worth twenty to thirty years and be confused at all about why this is happening then it goes on, does not done yes, but you have no standing to tell men if that is or isn't. The right move, because you are not one of them, ouch ouch,

yeah yeah. I will endorse that. But yes, I indoor setup now, but to be clear. Let let me defenders Well, she didn't say what you should do. She was more about what her preferences would be so she was saying if you act like this, I don't personally like it, but if you act like this other thing, I would personally like it so I've gotta, give her a break. if you're, gonna defender a little bit it was more about there are people, have personal preferences and maybe that's not their personal preference. So that's fair. but I also going to disagree with the jason. What he says, no honest person could have lived with less twenty thirty years and not be aware of it. You don't think men have just as big blind spots about women. Oh, I see is a giant blind spot. I dont really see dishonesty, but it was a funny comment. So here is a good twitter exchange.

It should, but I'm going to defender a little bit. I feel, like the the explanation is far more likely to be the men and women have an enormous blind spot. about the other and there is almost no way to fix. It is just too many of us or to confused. So I definitely agree with jason about me. Maybe men could explain this to you, wouldn't be that complicated But I don't think this exchange should have turned as savage as it did, because she was really just asking the question at the I do. I do appreciate her appreciate the work she does, and so I don't want to sound like I'm but as a representative of young men verses women and what blind spots they have, I think this is just a perfectly exchange. I would like to add one thing to the analysis of ukraine, verses, russia,

I'm sure some body has already said this- probably lots of people, but I haven't seen it so I'll say when progress when the poor doctors are telling us how russia and Ukraine are gonna turn out, I hear the most is you don't understand that russia can be patient and they have become more resources I can just just grind on ukraine until they get what they want or there's nothing left so so rush almost can't lose because I just grind away and they don't have to worry about public opinion and they'll just keep doing it, but ukraine might run into people, and maybe the west will get tired of support.

So if you were a smart, better say some people you'd better than the one, with the most resources and staying power, I submit that that's a wrong analysis, because I think the critical thing will be collapse. Points, in other words, both ukraine and russia- might be. We don't know they might both be close to collapse, meaning a system collapse, a cascade of things that makes those system. Claps imagined, for example, is easier to imagine the russian side when russians I'd. Imagine if there's too many qualified people get killed to handle logistics like getting the food and the army Let's just say that the only thing that goes wrong, that that the russian army is so degraded and talent,

that they have nothing but literally drunks to deliver the food and ammunition just stops. Getting there s a system collapse, they still have plenty of food, they still plenty of guns and weapons, but the system collapsed because it was just week? Boy. You need one week boy in the collapses, so I think both should be looked at as system collapse problems a little less now that some mind minded where worse or mind. Reading this there's no mind reining in this. This is literally describing a system is not even people know. People had been discussed here so this is as that nato might collapse. First, I can see that I can see that the less say the support for ukraine.

Lapse: imaginative something happened to Lansky game over. What what happens if we found out says Lindsay I'm not now suggesting this, but what if we found out you did some huge corrupting or killed some people Suddenly, the public opinion would just completely change and it'd, be a system collapse and left. So you have two entities that are both in very, very vulnerable to total sis system collapse. If one peg its pulled out of the agenda they now You can ignore the fact that one of them might run and resources to the point where the collapse, as that can happen, but there

way more. There are way more ways it collapses than just who has the most resources that are applying to it. Would you agree with that? Would you agree that the system collapses a little under appreciated, because that's the thing you can't see until it happens is invisible. until it happens, but everybody can see everybody can see. Oh they used up their missiles. A lot of their military is already dead or injured. So that stuff we talk about because you can see it, but a potential system collapse would just be one component. You wouldn't even notice until it was, So just keep that in mind. I think you'll see stories the future about system collapse. The centre of gravity, analysis, Klaus, which caused the critical point culminating points. So

Surely this is already you no military doctrine right I mean it's too obvious, not be part of the military doctrine. Is it a prediction. it is short of a prediction is short of a prediction. is that we're definitely in that anything could happen situation, and I don't believe you know, data that comes out of that area, so I think either side could win at this point. What do you say Where would you be either side could win is unpredictable at this point. And then you also have to decide what winning looks like because we disagree what winning looks like as he Stephen say, russia is willing for certain well.

If you say there are winning for certain if their economy is forever shutdown of the you know, the main economic engine of the world would that be winning? What was he alright, ladies and gentlemen of youtube, I'm going to say goodbye for today and I'll see you tomorrow, I'm going to talk to the local people privately in their secret little platform, which you're not invited to well actually you're invited, but you'd have to subscribe. You should also subscribe here. There's a button there hit that button bye for now.