Good morning. Everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization is called coffee was got arms, never Has there been a fighter experience, How would you all like to join me come by all sort of conceptually and participate in the simultaneous. As yes, I think would, and all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tanker jealous just iron, a canteen, jug or flask vessel of any kind filling with your favorite liquid

at coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine the other day, the thing that makes everything better, it's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now. Go I dunno if you know, but the official mug, that's the entire simultaneous sip as well as might lip stains on it. well today, today might be a shorter version of livestock because I want to recommend you listen to these spaces audio that led to this morning You can find it on twitter. I re tweeted it so just look at my twitter, feed and you'll see it near the top and I asked people to tell me what I got wrong on the vaccination stuff. The pandemic.

and to inform me- and I dare say it's the best spaces of all time. Oh there was, there was anger. There were words, words were used, there was enlightenment, There was knowledge that was everything so act. I recommended. I think it would fascinate you too, to hear the drama on that thing. Move on go by your. Our I barely, twitter. Api is gonna, have a charge now used me free. If you don't maybe is it's a set of. I think we are private now on locals.

Davy I, as a set of instructions that third parties can use to access data, is to access data on twitter. Well, one of the problems is, I guess, botz reusing it. So one way to stop the boss is to charge for that, because they wouldn't want to pay the price, but there's a whole bunch of apps third party apps. They require that apia. So you just put a whole bunch of other apps and a business but I think it might be a good move. I don't know it's bad for some apps, so it's bad for the functionality. But it might improve the experience if it gets rid of some bots I would say I'm open minded on it.

Yeah. It wasn't. It obviously wasn't a thoughtless decision. Obviously they thought about it. I've got a feeling that made the right decision, or at least a rational decision, we'll see if is that right. Well, trump is in the news calling for peace talks. with ukraine and russia slamming I didn't for escalating toward world or three from a purely persuasion perspective. Is that a good play is trump, accurately finding the free money on the table and picking it up or is it a mistake? It feels like a clean, just a win: doesn't it Because everybody wants that the end they just don't know how to do it. oh promising you can do something that the other people care figure out do if you could make an argument for it.

We do have the ability to do what the others can do and we all would like to see them is actually a pretty strong argument. because he does seem to be the right personality at the right time that if anybody could get Putin to make a deal, I feel like it would be him and and partly for the euro, all the reasons that people have criticised for being too friendly with pot with by with a potent now. I think he was ever too friendly. I think that what he was in public, he said respectful things about boone, so that he would be able to speak with him. Should he ever need to in a you know, pure kind of way and preserve that so now he is the only person who can talk. The putin good will respect the problem probably the only one. So it's actually pretty strong play to say that

offer that when it doesn't look like anybody else, could so I like it from the persuasion perspective. I like it, let's talk about republican advantages. Rasmussen has noble and the republicans have two more policy issues that they ever advantage on, I'm an overwhelming advantage, but it's a solid advantage public humans, get more trust from voters on two crucial, crucial policy issues. Now it's only forty seven percent is of the public. The voting public trust Republicans more to handle taxes. So, on the question of taxes, there are more people. Trust Republicans is the lesson half, but more of them trust, republicans and.

Well, let's see on education, so they also trust. Republicans more and education now gives life forty seven percent to forty two, but but still less little solid solid advance. So now the republicans have the advantage in taxes, education, energy, immigration spending, immigration would be border. So what is it that the Democrats still have an advantage in any way? What walk this so year? They have an advantage and less say abortion, but now that's a state issue

if it's a state issue, it shouldn't have too much impact on the presidential election. Racism is an advantage. They complain more on racism, Others were not many advantages. Left is: it'll, be harder and harder to explain a democrat victory when the policies are all favoring. The other side are and there's now much news today, but. Oh so scientists to use a I too To help them forecast the future of climate change, Do I have to say anything else about that scientists

is a lie to help them forecast climate change and guess what a guy thinks that the forecasts as even more dire need. I I I that was trained by the scientists. Surprisingly, surprisingly, I know you didn't see a coming shock shock. So apparently, ai is already being used for fraud, like actually literally because there's way to call this anything else write them. A wholesome souls were already bullshit. Training, the eight to improve the models. That's bullshit on top of bullshit that lesson some light. Bullshit. We ve not seen this bullshit squared, that's bullshit times bullshit times bullshit like you, can get more bullshit than that, but how much of the average public is gonna say

who I was a little uncertain before, but now the the trade they I you trained. It. A bloody train. The idea up here and now we ve got some good. A I knowledge here is my. be the most absurd story. You'll ever see. The user, I d fixes business model of those projection models that are mostly guesses, nice. A visa is re. Rural, dead, butterflies, smart little figure out how to solve it is interesting, that I can predict the future in twenty years, but I can't figure out how to fix it puzzling, It turns out that the ay I can be trained to give you Answers that you want to hear, but it can't be trained to fix anything. Is it all already clear to you,

They, I will be a major source of fraud, because people think as real as long as people think is right you can fill it with anything, you want a let me do you know what happens if you go to chad, jpg. which, by the way, some new news, they're going to have a twenty dollar a month subscription site to their ai. I don't feel like I could not buy that. The other same feeling like if you didn't have access to the ai I feel like it would maybe not yet, but like really soon, that would be a big big problem. I have a feeling this will be the most valuable company in the world. The chat g p t? U cause, I don't know how not to pay that do. I, like, I, have to pay their twenty two.

Because a I is really everything about the future, like everything will change because of it, your ear ability to use. I, I is very much like learning to use a computer at the dawn of the computer edge now I happen to be just the right. Age was one of the first people. I was actually one of the first people to even have a personal computer at the big bank. Where I work like it was the first one in the whole company. Nobody had a personal computer except my little group of People we had one so getting on an early was a big advantage, and you can see that this is the case. Anybody who doesn't learn how to use the various ay I platforms to, say, take it a badge and can combine it with some taxed combined.

It was some other stuff if you don't know how to do that. In a few years you're going to be left behind, you won't be able to navigate anything. You know, it'll be like you're living to suddenly you're living in a tribal situation. Everybody else is living in civilization, so to me paying that twenty dollars to have access to the you know the first kind of important version of ai. I don't know how I can't pay that, like I just have to pay that it just feels like a requirement to stay up to date. Now you know the sort my job as well, to stay up to date with stuff, so it might be different for you but wow. This is a big deal, but my larger point is that ai will be the source of insane amount of fraud so the ai is going to be creating deep fakes. It's going to be making phone calls and other people's voices. Do you remember the story about the seventeen year old,

Who called twitter employees and asked them for their password and pretended to be twitters eighteen department and at work for some people? Now? if you got a phone call, and it was elon, mosques voice comes from a phone number. This block. if you read, isla, must voice on your phone said hello, Scott, Scott I'd like you to maybe hear me with me: do you think I would? No, it wasn't really well was say. I worked at the company. I worry that the company and I didn't have a lot of interaction with personally. but it was possible if I'm an engineer, someplace possibly could call me, you don't think I believe it with collar idea, because numbers can be private and they can be spoofed and all that

what we're about to enter this massive fraudulent environment. Where are we won't know? What is true is even worse worsen now so justly for that. How many of you believe there's a secret elite pedophile ring? There has power over the at least america. I'm just curious now, not necessarily piece of aid. I believe that it does exist and lead to powder firing ere, I gotta say maybe

I used to be strongly on the side of all. That is crazy, that's crazy, but I have to say that Epstein certainly seems to fit that model, because he specifically, you know, was focusing on underage so I think Epstein is an example of an elite pedophile ring who were trying to get other people and compromising situations. It looks like it, so I don't know if Epstein specifically. It was part of the elite ring that people talk about. I dunno why why I'm get the monetized any minute? Now John there's some competition- I guess Nicky alias flirting As rubbing probably will mike bumpo same, tim Scott. The same. Let me ask you this we probably all assume that if everything goes,

it looks like it's going. Trump should still have the biggest number of people in the primaries, and that should be enough to give him the nomination. But Is my question in the hypothetical: if TIM Scott got the nomination, could he lose? I don't see it. Do TIM Scott, a respected black republican, senator, you don't think he could pick some votes off from the Democrats. That's all he has to do right. Just have to pick off a few votes and you're and you're good, because I think he will get one hundred percent of republicans. Just like always, you know not really one hundred percent below you will get all you will get almost all the republicans you'd pick off a few independents and democrats, I feel like he could lose

how about the nikki haley Snyder you've got a woman. I guess she is a person of color. I never know who is what these days? Do? You think that she could lose Nikki haley, I feel like she could yeah. I feel like she could. I feel, like TIM Scott, couldn't lose how bout mike pompeo's. Did you think monk my comp could win soon? Travellers is a. Is a white guy he's an old awake I so the older, why guy doesn't get any any help from the Democrats but also he was there see. I do you think you could get enough republicans to vote for the x out of the sea. I guess MIKE pompey. It probably a solid, a solid person ass. My view, I think, is very solid.

But I would never vote for somebody who is that it seems to me that a hundred percent disqualifying or should they. I got it wouldn't matter how much I greater them. There's no way. I'm gonna say yes to somebody who was in the sea. I never do that. So I think other people would have the same opinion and again is nothing. It gives him. I don't know I mean I actually don't have any negatives to say about him. He seems pretty solid, pretty solid, but that's gotta be that's gotta be considered, so I think trump only has himself to beat is really running against, off. When you say does it feel like that trump is only really against himself. So if he He stays in the middle of the road. You just goes all the way. The all areas where was like

to me, and the more people get into the primary is more likely that trouble win. Years of they learn today, so it groundhog day and if you're watching from a country, that's not crazy. America. You need to know the groundhog day is when a specific grounds they change amount once in a while, but name image, shame is put story, books, books, tawny, phil, or something like that. and here's. What I do know is that the name of the town in which packs books a lives is gamblers knob, gamblers knob. Now that raises some questions, If you saw my title for today show, I said the topics would be trump stuff

materials and gobblers knob, which is just a coincidence that that's a coincidence. By years, why are you now? I live in the town, those very much like the name of its down right, so I live in a very pleasant. town and the name of the town is actually pleasanton. Just like you expect. If you go to places pleasant right in the name, there's also a nearby there's a pleasant hill. Very pleasant place to places will pleasant and the name and darn it they're pretty pleasant. But if I go, gamblers. Knob is gonna, be As fun as it sounds just wondering, that's all But anyway,

saw his shadow or something so we got six more waste. Winters on like that very important are a term doktor kelly victory. So, on twitter day she said I am fascinated- the folks Scott Adams are perplexed. those of us who were right from the very beginning and that's all and capps right from the, very beginning. knew what we knew. How do we now explain to me how she knew it. You know leave solid reasons. She said she studied science, excellent good start. She knows history this. This is her explanation. If she knew good, studying science and knowing history excellent. I use patterns. I love this really data excellent. This very rational thanks.

She was honest. Well, that's it that's a change from people like me right. and it was not difficult, so The science illustrate the patterns, the review data. She got it now. Here's my question. How do I know who are the people who got the right? Because I don't have the skills I do not have the skills that she possesses. So I can't do it myself. But how can I tell that she did it right if other people did the same thing and got different answers. Hmm, this would be the question which I deal with on the spaces audio that you should go. Listen to when I end this early today. Hm, so it seems that there are people who can do that they can look at the science history in the patterns and the data and that it could do deep dive and then they can get an answer.

Well. You should listen to one of the doctors that I talked to on spaces. Wait till the end to hear this, or just give you a little preview, the doktor did. The same thing is a man of science and in those legs. And so one of the things you looked into was the great success of ivory makin in india. Now is a big part of history making- and I asked him if he saw the debunks so there's a lot of information has said. I've reaction was a big success in india, but also Our separate articles and expert opinions that debunking and say it's all a garbage, and none of that data is accurate. So I asked him if he'd seen the debunks, but he had not. so there a man of science and pattern, the history and he had seen. One set of data that I had seen by, not seen another set of data that that I'd seen him he had not and the years the question.

How did he know or could either the I'd seen other data. I wouldn't know that. Why couldn't How would I know if I looked as if I my own research, like you did, How would I know if I saw everything or if I'd missed something as gigantic as debunking the primary thing he used to make his decision? That's pretty big. Now, I'm not saying the debunk was right or that the data was right or wrong, but I am saying that if you didn't see the debunk,

Couldn't really say you did your own research or that you knew something see this is this. Is the documentary problem? If you watch the Michael jackson documentary that says he was guilty of terrible things is very persuasive, super persuasive if you watch the other documentary right after it. That says that the first one was total garbage and here's how they lie to you. It's very persuasive one hundred per cent persuasive, and there are opposites. So how does your research help? Basically, everybody looked at one of those two documentaries, and I know what I know: I'm done so the people who believe that they saw everything are hallucinating because it's unlikely

there are other people who said, I only need it now than it was mandated by the government. So you need to know the moment is mandated right. Some people are agreed with me. I'm seeing a lot of thumbs up come out as soon as you know is mandated. That should be enough to know it's a bad idea. Which is the same way. I know, there's seatbelts, don't work now all the day. This is a sea bolts, work really well, I'm aware of that. but there are also mandated, which means the data is all fake, because once you mandy sometime were done with the conversation. I think I think we're done now. I didn't know that oh come on. There's somebody other youtube who says analogies or not, persuasive what,

I am hearing this for the first time. How long should I keep up the prank that they're not around to begin early as anybody figured out? What I'm doing here you I I feel like I feel like I can say it directly at this point and they still wouldn't see it. Am I flip flopping am I am I am I walking the fence what's going on here? What is he up to what is happening so also confusing? Well, there's new study out, I don't know the details of it, but I saw their breath wine steam was mockingly saying he got another one right, which is that the vitamin d appears to be strongly protective against covered

Now can we all give brett and heather higher credit they deserve for getting that right and getting it early everybody can we give them full credit without reservation, without reservation right now How do I do on vitamin d now? I'm pretty sure that I was one of the first people in the first months of the pandemic, to tell you to take vitamin d but, to make a distinction that only the smart people here will understand. Raise your hand if you're smart, because the rest of you will understand this, but you're all smart she'll get this in addition to knowing the vitamin d is generally good for you, which brett was correctly on early. and I was on an early and a lot of people were, would you agree that,

probably most of you know it? I didn't have to tell you now, there's a second vitamin d story and here's Only the smart people will be able to follow me reading ready. The second story is that I'm making the claim- and if you falsify falsified thou, be fine, does I would love to know, The truth right, if what I'm telling you it's not true correctly, because I'd love to know the truth and goes like this, In addition to knowing the vitamin d is probably really good for you in general, I was there this person in the world. This is my claim, and oh yes, I know I was sounds Just so you are aware, I know totally. the sounds and I'm just anyway, I was the first person in the world to recognise the pattern, that the people dying were all low vitamin d people, and I said it in public before anybody

nobody in the world, no expert, nobody noticed it before. I did. now everybody said: vitamin d is good for you, but years. I noticed wait a minute: black americans are doing worse, wait a minute smokers are doing worse. Old people and where people are doing worse, did people with diabetes or doing worse people in some countries where there is not much vitamin d and this low smog or doing worse people in countries where you have to cover yourself up completely, such as around or even worse,. And I said every place where they're doing worse? They have low vitamin d. I look to sweden and said o shoot. They supplement, you would think they have lower vitamin d, but they have high viability. Somebody says salvaged, beat me too the punch in january, twenty twenty

I would love that to be true, because you know if somebody's going to beat me I'd rather be somebody. I respect so, but check that I think you're going to find in this just aghast, because I know. see it make the distinction between whether he said it was the vitamin d is protective and good for you or Did you say I see the pattern in in all the demographics So I'm only may hear claim that I saw the pattern of who died but- a lot of people early said that vitamin these good for you. So that was a common thing. I came in the womb screaming

It's true now, why do I say it so arrogantly and obnoxiously, as anybody figured out, why I do that? Yet? Is it because I don't know how not to know because it's more provocative, I am the more likely you'll try to prove me wrong and then maybe I'll find none. If I'm wrong, because I like to be well, I dunno, if I like, to be wrong, but I'd like to know that the truth is my claim that on the biggest question of the pandemic- I think it was the biggest question you know what protects you and why doesn't that beyond the generic? Everybody needs vitamin d and it would help you. Everybody got that right, that I noticed the pattern of the deaths and was very clear in you know in the first months months, so

So if, if somebody, if somebody also saw the demographic, the demographic pattern and say that before I did, send me or send me a link to that organism or give them some love, because if anybody beat me to that, it'd be surprised, I'm going to tell a story just to the locals people when we sign off here. That will thus even more ego maniacal than what I just did that there's a limit. Even for me, I, as a muted you or something

I dunno what you're talking about there's a north korea nuclear threat. Today, I don't think it really is. I mean I know that he talks, but I don't think north korea is. I think we need to worry about at this point. Have you noticed that a lot of the pushback at me is my personality. And not what I say like on the on the spaces. One of the people just had to come and tell me that my problems on the brainwashing narcissist. Rapporteur DE, like maybe dig into the argument, but

without the argument. Islam are brainwashing, narcissist, okay, how many of you think by live stream personality or my twitter personality is a good proxy for my actual real person personality. Do you do you think that I mean clearly there are things that I wouldn't say in person that I say I say in public for effect, but I think, but I trust mostly is to know when I'm doing it for effect, I do it for profit provocation.

Cause provocation is fun. It gets. It gets you more into the fight. It's part of the fun talking about myself too much. The trouble is I'm I I am the news. You know. If you talk about the news and you're in the news. This is a little weird situation cause. I actually am the news today. If you saw a tweet from legendary energy dude, you all know that twitter account legendary energy. So there's a young man with Crazy eyes, as I saw his eyes as soon as I saw his eyes on the on the tweet, I saw the crazy eyes I was like. Oh, this is going to be fun

So he is apparently decided that I am lumped in with my vaccination opinion with SAM Harris who promoted it and Ben Shapiro who also strongly recommended people give accident, and then he said the three of them and then he treated us like we were. We were the same now, how many of you think that my opinion on vaccinations were similar to say I'm harris or bench shapiro, Emily of think that that was similar, Services overseers somerset, yes, identical. Well now those of you say: yes, you are puzzled by all the people say: no, that's weird! Isn't it because most of the people are saying now. Why is that? Maybe it's because two of them recommended

the vaccination and one recommended. that you wait as long as possible because its risky, and I certainly would not recommended possess and save you. But poor legendary energy in this crazy eyes by the way, his eyes or couldn't we cognitive, dissonance eyes. If you look at the tweet I see. What's it look like when somebody's entered you're, just illusion, land just look in his eyes and that picture Well, when you learn to recognise Lee the look in his eyes, it changes everything. That's why haven't tesla so a hypnotist can tell when you're, actually you're you're just sort of in a little bubble of illusion now. You can argue everybody's an illusion all the time which I do, but sometimes you just just flat out hallucinate

and the eyes always tell us, this is sort of like sort of like crazy eyes. I I can't do an impression of it, but because serious, crazy eyes, sort of the Adam schiff look Adam schiff's lot eyes tell you that he's like Yossi alright, so we're gonna cut it short today because not much going on and We recommend that you listen to the spaces check my twitter feed. It will entertain you and delight you and that's all for now on the youtube platform, but I'm going to talk to locals for a little bit bye for now