Welcome to the highlight of civilization, that's called coffee was got atoms today, show amazing. I mean I don't like to get. You too fired up for no reason, but it will be amazing and that's why I'm going to make the locals platform private right now, because I'll tell them something. Secret stuff later well. Well. Well, would you like to take today's amazing moment that you're about to experience Made it to the best thing that ever happened to anybody everywhere in the entire history of civilization, Id like that and all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tanker jealous or style akin to a joke or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite liquid? I like

Was he enjoying me now for the unparalleled pleasure? The dopamine the other day, the thing that makes everything better everything is called. The simultaneous sip happens now go oh and a special welcome to any clot burts, who still don't know they were the victims of a hoax, a double hooks. You got hoax by once by four chan and read it and then, once by me you got double host. most hoechst group in america, double hoechst good for you. Here's a trivial question, for you: do the time when slavery was legal in america. Name too,

as who did not own slaves did not one slaves, while it was still legal so, prior to Abraham, lincoln. Both of them were named Adams right. Atoms and john Quincy Adams, the two presidents who did not own slaves back when it was legal. In fact, job atoms famously defended a slave as his freedom. Yes, so my cousins always been on the side of the right now, there's a video of me this going round, in which I said in no uncertain terms that, based on opinion polls, Rasmussen, bow half of black americans, don't think it's cool to be white

It's just not okay, to be white. So since I have designated that to be a hate group, black americans, a hate group collectively, not every individual, obviously anything I say about a group you're all smart enough to know that doesn't apply to all individuals right. You know that right if I say that most of the president's, until obama or all of my guests were white, that doesn't mean I was present. You get that right, you can talk about groups of doesn't mean anything about any individual. So if I say that black americans or a hey group, does that mean I dont like my neighbor, who is black and the doktor?

oh he's great love. The guy has nothing to do with individuals. I've made no comment about individuals. I love black individuals, so in all kinds of it jewels so as an individual, moist gonna treat you as an individual whether I wanna date, you have sex with you hire you work with you talk to you I was gonna, be really individuals and I've. I've ever had and negative interactions with any black american in my life or black any nationally

but it is nonetheless true that white people will try and help black america for decades and decades as completely failed. We should just stop doing it cause all we got. All we got is called racists. Basically, there was no payoff. I I think what finally pushed me over the edge was finding out that the school systems in our yeah a lot of our inner cities. There are graduating zero people who can read and do math zero, and you know, as I've said before, the only strategy that works for any group in america is focusing on education. If that's not your top folk.

I don't want to help you, let me say as clearly as possible. If, if education is not your primary focus now I get that is hard to do. But if it's not your primary focus, I don't want to have anything to do with you, helping you improve helping you Succeed reparations nothing on the other. We won't have a conversation I who, who is the who is most notable black leader pushing education as a way to improve the life of black americans. Who was that person? So we said Ben Carson, maybe a probably problem that size adult milk aspect. Ok, I hit the fact that that's true, I hate the fact that that's true, I think it's true the bill to us. We was bigger, educate.

it wasn't. The yeah got good, but you're also you're mentioning politicians who are more famous just for being, you know, generally politicians, but but who's the who's. The black leader, who just is known as the education person now you're you're, mentioning a lot of people like Thomas ol, who has excellent bed, carson obama yeah. They all say was not really focuses if you tell me that any of them are famous as making at their focus. I would say, may be famous to a very small number of people, but there's nobody is really the brand for that. Yeah Larry elder abuse, I'm sure every every black leader has talked about education, but it's not really talked about like a focuses it. How much do we talk about

George Floyd verses education, I'm not even close, so anybody who doesn't focus on education I I don't want to help them amount completely out, but just just to be completely clear has nothing to do with individuals right. I love individuals of all types always have that. That's not changing

Just if we're going to treat groups as groups, I'm going to say well here, let me say this- the lgbt group, if it's sort of weird, to throw such different people in the same group, but lgbt people in america huge success- am I right have you ever said to yourself? I don't want to go into that gay neighborhood because of all that of all the crime and littering you've, never that you've. Never that nope, I dunno. So you know you can talk about groups and say some things that maybe you're a little bit useful, but you know doesn't have anything to do with individuals

The alright have you been to atlanta, alright, so do you know how the world works, because I said something provocative that literally everyone agrees with which is if you're white don't live in a black neighborhood, it's too dangerous and half of the people. There will think it's not ok to be white. According to the recent poll. That would be crazy, so you're, predictably, a white, a white man comes after me on twitter and says: oh you're telling me I should get away from my black family members. Does that sound like something? I would say that you should get away from your black family members, I'm assuming in laws. I dunno, that's stupid, that's stupid,

And when I asked him do you live in the mostly black neighbourhood? I didn't way for the answer, because I don't have to because the people who are going to come after be all agree with me: there's not a single one of those white people who are going to be. You know what what do you call it signaling, socially sibling, they're going to come after me to socially signal, but they don't live in black neighborhoods they're. Taking my advice. That's all I'm saying: am I saying that you have this

individuals, probably a sister in law, or something like that. Am I saying that his sister in law sister in law, sucks because she is black now who now? I don't even know your sister in law, don't even know or of course not I'll, even go further. I'm not sure that black women are even part of the question, because you don't see a ton of danger from black women mean you see. Videos of them, in this stuff. Usually has women fighting with other women most of the time, but it's not it's not old black people is now senior citizens is not is not toddlers So it's not even about black americans about youngish black males. For whatever reason,. and I'm no longer interested in finding out it's a dangerous situation that should stay away.

but if any individual young black man comes to ask for a job should be fully considered with no bias. If you could manage it, so yeah, don't don't discriminate against individuals. Don't do that by helping, as the group would be ridiculous at this point, did you see the video a buy them following up the stairs of air force? One is going up. The stairs suddenly goes down to force, but fairly quickly. He got back up now. I believe, that's been misinterpreted. Because what I saw was a look like he was starting to change into a werewolf. they know how that works. Right, you'll be walking along awesome and you get onto all fours. But then I think he caught himself because he realized he wasn't at the entrance to the played yet is I call all and then once he gets back on

at least back into werewolf mode? I mean that's just a guess. I wouldn't put any money on it, but that's just my interpretation. I dunno like that's just what I saw alright, rasmussen did polling about Nicky early, how she would do the presidential race if she ran against Biden and all Oh, how she would do in primaries. Interestingly, she would be binding in I had done about that. So, interestingly, I think I lost the signal here for a moment but according to rasmussen, polls in three weeks. contest for the g opium p, nomination between trump.

alien dissenters. Now it won't be a three way probably, but it might be towards the end as possible, and let's see the fifty two percent of republicans would choose trump if it were a three way between the scientists and the guilty, and when I say a three way I will allow you to ignoring naughty thought. That's not what I intend, but As I said, I realized. Ok, that's what you're thinking so you're allowed. You may think naughty sexual thoughts when I say through a competition, go ahead. Do it. You know you want to anyway, so yeah trump would give fifty two percent in the primary twenty eight percent would say. Hayley and twenty four would say dissenters. Did you see that come and now that I assume us, because the

Tromp votes and the dissenting votes are a little bit. Fungible like those are the ones that can go either way more easily. Whereas making the votes are probably an anti trump folk. Does that make sense so under them in dynamic you can see how a hilly would be slightly more than santas. If it were a three way it doesn't mean that would be that if it were a two way, if it were a two way between Nikki hilly and dissenters, I think the trump votes would go mostly to the santas. I think I think it'll be two to one probably two to one dissenters, but I don't know because I was actually surprised by this result and it's also super early. You know

yeah make too much of the balls. At this point, I buy more interest legally. If Nicky healy went up against Joe Biden have dead in a hypothetical courting dress, wasn rasmussen forty five percent of likely us voters would vote for hayley and forty one percent for Biden? What do you think of that? Thus our legitimate- because I want mickey jelly would pick up some of the key. person of color woman vote just automatically possess our work

no matter, what you are, you sort of pick up that group we some of them automatically and we we don't know we don't typically have republicans running for office who can sort of automatically get any democrat votes just by being who they are. It doesn't work that way. so it'll the interesting to a person of color running as republican speaking, which will talk about the roma swami, innovate. all right. I could not be more amused or interested and the latest Joe rogan conversation with Eric wasting. How many of you saw that talking about ufos? That was was most interested conversations super interesting, but I'll give you gave their part that I loved

According to Iraq, there is some governmental group, topsecret governmental group who has. as long ago as three years ago, I believe, started offering to Eric and also to sam harris that they could personally be taken to a secret government facility to see what Eric supposes might be something in the? U F, o domain. But you know that the the actual topic of what government wants to show them is not disclosed. So, there's that there is an assumption happening here, there's about aliens, but I think that's just short of being confirmed now. Here's the funny part. Apparently there have been a number of back and forth in which the offer was made.

I will take you to see this top secret stuff and then it would fall apart and then they come back We ve been at this time, were really going to show you the stuff, and then they say yes, indeed be planning to do it and then something which age laid delayed for three years: I've never seen anything, but for three years I ve been teased. Here's, the funny bark, sam hair, bow down after the third one. So after the third time they said they were going to do it and they changed their minds or they delayed SAM Harris said. I think he just called bs on it. Yeah now Eric still interested and I dunno it would be hard not to be interested because if they ever come through and actually show them something it'd be interesting. But here's. My question to you.

just on the surface. You don't know anything about the situation, except what I tell you and here's what I'm gonna tell you of all the people on the planet earth that the top secret organization want to show,

the? U f o's. They chose SAM Harrison, the Eric Weinstein. Can you explain that? How is that not funny just thought the surface just and by the way, I'm not making fun of the two individuals, the two individuals I like a lot like sam harris like bret weinstein, even if I don't agree with them and different things that involve they're both very serious. You know american patriotic good citizens, they're good people very smart. Meanwhile, I have only positive thoughts about both of them, but I think it's hilarious that the two of them entertain the concept that they would be allowed, the secret peek at the us house. Let me tell you this: do you know how a preg, like the best prank is organized? Do that

to do that. Let me thought I think I've explained this before the best kind of prank is the one that wouldn't be believed by anybody except the subject in the break the target. So let me give you an example: let's say you at a friend who believed he or she to be quite beautiful, but the rest of you know so much. You were thinking. Well, maybe you think you're beautiful and its good, the ever good opinion of yourself, maybe not now, if there were a person in your life like that who believe they were beautiful but objectively didn't seem like a prank on that person would be a model agencies, are you because, although you do not have standard beauty, you have exactly the kind of beauty that's in vogue and we want to make a major, a major magazine, your pictorial of you now? What

make this a funny prank is that nobody in the world would believe it's true, except the one who got brecht. there is the only one who thinks that's plausible now take this back to SAM Harris, bret weinstein, and by the way this prank would have worked on me so easily right. I'm glad I'm glad it didn't happen to me, but imagine coming to me it's the same problem right is an ego problem imagine coming to me some government agency, and they say Scott you're, the only person in the country. We trust to show you Are you a foes, and I say why: why would I be that person and they say well, We ve listening to you on social media and you say such smart

unbiased ladens, though we think you're the best messenger to tell the world about it. What would I do that situation it if that were a prank? What would I do? Oh, I would fall for that so hard. I would fall through the floor for that break. Why because his right on the nose of what I would want to believe right is our is our like. It makes me look good, so, of course I want to believe it we'll have makes perfect sense of all the people in the united states. They ve been watching me on twitter. Yes, yes, that's that's gotta, be it, and all of my wise tweets have finally put me in the past where I alone can see the secrets of ufos, wonder why my plane ticket? When do I

my plane ticket I wanna go now now. If it turns out that we have captured alien spaceships were dead aliens or better. Yet, I've in cages- and it turns out there Eric, had seized him and take some pictures and tells the world about them. then, I'm wrong about everything. However, this has all the hallmarks of a very good break. I don't know I don't know, but if I had to if I did. is between we ever you are in custody and the two people the government wanted to see a first for salmon eric

think I'm gonna go with prank as being a little bit more likely. There is, however, one other possibility, and I can't tell you the details, But I will tell you that years ago personally in a sensitive government and department. I guess you'd call it all I'll, be vague, I'll call. It a department in the area- government asked if I wanted to have a preview of the government's most secret knowledge about a topic that I won't mention.

Imagine the topic, but I was I was asked. If I wanted to see the the biggest secrets of the government, the things that you would love to know, trust me, you would love to know, and it was all bullshit because I did say yes and I did go look and it was all bullshit in my opinion now that the person who is in charge of it did not think it was bullshit. The person charge believed that they had found something of value, and I listened to it listen to the evidence, and I said to myself. No, so the other possibility is that it's not a prank on SAM Harrison brett once it is possible that the government has something they don't know what it is like. It could be like a a piece of metal that they care.

if I am and that in their minds they built it up to be more than it is, which is just something they can identify. So my guess is keep thinking they have a, u r, foe and then show some people, but the more they think about it. Maybe they just have a piece of metal that they can identify, and might it might be just something like that where they think they have something, but they do so again. we're just speculating can't read minds, but I'll tell you what I would not bet on. I would not bet on. We have a captured, u f, o's and the government wanted sam harris of bret weinstein to see a first. feels unlikely. Do you know? I that's unlikely, because Firstly, they would have asked me to see. First, am I right that was sarcasm? I love story,

so good speaking himself, maris harris he's getting a lot of trouble by things when I say so, of course, I'm going to defend them on this, because this is as exactly what I say is get all kinds of internet trouble, so he's even these even trending sam heiresses on twitter. He quit twitter. So one way to trend on twitter is to quit twitter. So. What he said. This is a well. I think he said this, it's it's it's a quote. I didn't see it on video, but it sounds like he would have said it. So I believe it's true, sir, is a quote from SAM harris during the pandemic. We witness the birth of a new religion of contrary in this and conspiracy thinking, the first sacrament of which to quote: do your own research sound familiar because of the problem

is a very few people are qualified to do this research and the result Society driven by strongly held unfounded opinions on everything from vexed in safety to the war in ukraine, agree or disagree that word salad, you killing your ear and cognitive dissonance. If it sounds like word salad, this is completely clear. This is very clear. Here is where I agree with him: he did not exclude himself from the category of people who can do their own research and get a good answer. He did not say this is a skill I have, but you don't have it now if he had than we do. something to quibble with, but if you saying none of us have that accept

very rarely. Somebody in then milan border that completely yeah. No, nobody has s skill and in the most most qualified people in the field, often dough haven't we see this all the time so This as I like, I might have influence nobody, I'm just asking, because you know I've been saying exactly this for, like three years have set it out loud, Bunch is common sense, so that would be the argument that I did not influence it, but the wording of it feels a little scottish so to speak. Alright.

I'm going to try to introduce a new phrase to politics and I'm going to call them political gunners. Have you ever heard that phrase a gouda? It comes from another context. I will see if anybody knows what it is before explaining those of even know what it is. Billing too much about yourselves. I let me tell you in the in the naughty world of adult entertainment,. When the usually a man Is it so interested in his own self pleasure that he take some sort of a zombie appearance? I will give you an impression, but it would be the biggest me is ever that you ever saw, so I can give you an impression, but imagine

a zombie face, while the one of the hands is is busy- and you know the gunner is like oh yeah, that sort of thing so, but I feel like there's a political, good glass and that's the point who believe hoaxes there, obviously not true before you research them Now. I agree with SAM harris that nobody's good at research, even if they think they are they're not, but sometimes you don't need to research things to know. What's true, am I right? Let me give you an example

If you heard a story on social media, they said that Joe Biden was an actual cannibal and went and we're just finding out and that he eats children every night for dinner like actual living, children kills them and eats them. Would you need to research that as a serious question, would you need to research that? No, no, you don't need to research. That who would believe that only a political gooder, somebody who was so busy masturbating to their own team that they could no longer think in a coherent way now, let me give you an example: that's almost like that that the gunners actually believe

I believe that the president of the united states, once pre meditatively and with full intention, got in front of the country and said that neo nazis fire people didn't have to resource that did it did you have to go and really look at the transcript I mean I dead. But not because I needed to know this, because I was trying to on programme the gunners, but the good I just can't hear it because you know their head is going furiously in the brain has just turned off my team, my team. Okay, I'm going to give you the meme, I'm sorry. I have to give you the me. It goes like this Ah, my team might have lied to you, my dave, ok, there's your meme have one with it have fun with it. I really said to the universe so about,

If you heard that are president suggested drinking bleach as a solution, the curve it did. You need to research that night and you did not need to research that you should not have had to research That was clearly and obviously something that didn't happen if you say all bus got, maybe it wasn't bleeds, but it was a liquid disinfected. No, no, you don't have research, whether he thought listerine was ok. Now you doubt you don't have to research that the only people who would be confused by that would be, These people- you couldn't possibly see this year on the surface and believe they have to look into it. You don't you don't have to look into it.

Political gooders. I also love the fact that the people will believe all the trouble. Says they start with the assumption that there are smarter than trump, and yet they fall for every hoax. It's a weird assumption if you start with the sun, you're smarter than him? anything he says that isn't what you say: you say: oh well, it must be racist to think she should ring bleachers something. But if you start with the assumption that he's an intelligent person who might who might in some cases no more than you do we ve ceilings,

It wasn't that if you started with that assumption, the hoax just disappears. You have to assume that trump has an I q of seventy and somehow became president of the united states anyway, and apparently that's a real belief. I've actually talked to intelligent, successful people Who believes that trouble as such a low? I q that he only became president by accident. Just a weird conflation of events. That's a real opinion. How do you have that opinion? There's only one way: europe, your political good fear too,. This is funny speaking. Do your own research. You are all aware that their bread, Stephen Steavens Stevens, Brett steffens,. near times did a big article in which he talked about the.

new study of studies that said that masks don't work? Y'all saw that right. So as a big study of other studies and a paper about other studies wasn't exactly a matter of medicine, I think that it was a sort of a review of all the science and the conclusion was masterwork well Kurt. I can walt also had at least an ex new york times. Writer says in his sweet. The new york times has published and salute, lay reckless and wrong. Near times opinion peace by breast. About a scientific paper. He clearly. red, he allows one of authors to stated the article quote, mass, don't work recovered nineteen

the paper says no such thing in fact bob above so he goes on to say that the papers, pure garbage and etc. Now. Do you believe that the new york times article from brother steavens that looked at all the science about masks and found no evidence that they help? Do you think they'll find that reliable? Because you did your own research? Do you know that a lot of the studies were done before covered? Did you know but they were pretty covered. It wasn't even tested covert. Did he do a lot of the studies were about whether you could contract at versus whether you're going to you know, breathe it out. Yeah yeah, we are private. Basically, the research was garbage.

but the resources as mass don't work is garbage bus, It was the resolution says they work. So do your own research is a fine anything you want. You can find that they work, which I've done by the way I've done. My own research and I found huge, yes, very, reliable evidence, the mass work I have also done by research and found that they don't you can find both you can. You can totally fine both. How can I tell the difference? The only thing I would say for sure is this, hence has not demonstrated that they work with any data that seems useful if science at this point, especially at this point

If they can't prove they work. Well, then the question of using them is just easy right. It's already a meme yeah, it's just easy. Anyway, so I think we're all against masks, but others just emphasis for sam heiresses opinion do your own research is absolutely useless, is completely useless. In fact, there are three things that don't work. Follow the science when you read. following the science didn't work, I don't they. It works for anything anymore. How about do your own research? Well, being who did their own research had different answers, but we know that doesn't work, how about listen to the experts that work and listen to the experts now,

no so these are three things we all thought used to work follow the science listen to the experts. but also do your own research just for double check. None of those have any evidentiary value at all. None, let me tell you added, no, what's true see only way, can you engineer a product out of it That's it. Engineering is the only way you know if something's true it'll take a moment of her son limb. Just think about engineering is the only way you know something's. True science doesn't give you that The science is always yo, even when it is a fact. It still subject, revision. but if you're an engineer- and you say- ok, you claim you claim- I can make a satellite your scientific claims- if I use this

science I can make a satellite and it can communicate with earth. Maybe do gps well, let's find out, so I'm going to build a satellite are going to put it in in the sky and see they tells me where I am oh shit. That works is true. That's truth,. The app is telling me from the satellite that approximately in this room, that's truth, everything else. Tell if everything else is just a maybe so I think this is where we ve been fooled forever so, This is not where you go to find out was true, engineering is engineering, tells you was true, let's take it too The medicine science says this pillar will work.

You know you gotta make the pill, The only way you now, as you pointed out, earn ceu abbott's, that's engineering. I mean it's medical engineering in this case chemistry, but I'd call it engineering, not only engineers that is felt. No. I don't mean that only an engineer can determine. What's true, I'm saying that your way to know if something is true, if somebody can make a product of it and it works well disposed to now. Even that isn't a hundred percent, because you Engineers something that works for them one reason. For example, we talked about this before if you believe that the wing of your airplane had to have a bernoulli effect in order to get left and you built them. Laid. It would fly years later, you'll find out that the bernoulli effect had nothing to do with it. So you can tell

something an engineer it and find out it works, but then you have to fly the plane upside down to find out what was true. If you fly the plane upside down, which you can do and the flies that you know, the bernoulli effect wasn't at least wasn't necessary. That might have helped, but it wasn't necessary. The software this georgia grand jury because the walls are closing in on trump and this time well this time they gotta. Let me tell you all those other times Those were just that was just play, but this time this time they got him and you know what he did. He used the word fined for votes just.

I end this many votes as Ellen Dershowitz explains last night. I think Kennedy as Ellen Dershowitz explains? The word find implies. They already exist. How do you use the word invent or possibly concoct or possibly lie or possibly pretend or possibly cheat or possibly do something illegal, then I would say he committed a crime, but as somebody to find something

though you obviously believe might be there either through a recount or potentially there's a barrel of balanced, didn't get counted somewhere. You don't go to jail for that. You don't go to jail because you used the word find and other people thought you man cheat, you don't go to jail for what other people thought. You bet, that's, not a crime, it doesn't matter how many people think you meant. Something is still matters what you said. It doesn't matter what they, what they think he meant nobody goes to jail for that nobody, the odds of trump going to jail well that, and now I heard that the georgia or atlanta, wherever it is, the prosecutor wants to use rico, because there are a whole bunch of people. Talking about you know what to do to have. The election changed basically

Is it illegal for a bunch of people to talk about how to get a political outcome, It's not a legal issue, break the law now, there is. There is a troubling element of this, which is the the so called faked electors, but even the fake electors were operating under illegal theory. Am I wrong about that? I believe there were lawyers who said there were minority lawyers in the sense that other people disagree but I believe there are a few lawyers who said yeah. I think we could do this. Would you maybe pass constitutional muster I don't think anybody thought it was like an insurrection. I think they thought they were trying to get the right result. So you'd have to find somebody who admits that they knew they lost and they did it.

If you can't find anybody in this whole rico conspiracy, who didn't honestly believe that trump won there's nothing What do you need at least one person in this conspiracy? it's a year. We know it wasn't real, but we're trying to steal the election anyway. have you heard of one person, even one is usually of whistleblower. Was by now, but as even one person said, you know, you know we really didn't believe anyone. We were just sort of acting like it. Oh. The rigour thing is so ridiculous and find that you so ridiculous and once again, who believes who believes that trump broke the law, it's obvious it's been demonstrated, is part of the public bracken.

And he's going down. Should I give you and oppression of the people who believe that? How can you believe that every seriously, how could you believe that he's? Is it legal trouble over this. I as another one see around us still talking about how the. The dominion lawsuit surfaced all these internal fox memos outlet, I'm not I'm sorry, I'm not gonna talk about grand jury. Forget the best part

So, apparently, this grand jury only recommends to another grand jury. I didn't know that was the things. Am I getting that right that the grand jury is only making a recommendation to another grand jury and that other grand jury would have to indict? Is that right to grand juries for one case, others, an investigative grand jury and then a regular one? The indictment grand jury. Alright, I guess I didn't know how that worked.