Topics:
- Anti-Trumpers are running out of ammo
- Vague, general, mind reading anti-Trump criticisms
- Dale illustrates John Kerry’s conversation with the Iranians
I fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer this method over accepting advertisements or working for a “boss” somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I’m trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that.
See all of my Periscope videos here.
Find my WhenHub Interface app here.
The post Episode 222 Scott Adams: The Anti-Trumper Ammo Problem appeared first on Dilbert Blog.
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Hey everybody come on in Papa still room
that's right in this digital universe, this
related reality plenty of space
you're bound only by storage and bandwidth- and we got plenty of that-
You know what else we have. Let me tell you I'll, tell you what else we have.
Good morning, Howard
bring Jean
Tell you what we have: we've got coffee and it's time for the simultaneous sip and it go
goes like this.
Hello, Kathleen welcome to your first periscope coffee with Scott Adams,
now. Let's talk about President Trump's critics
running out of ammo. They
hard to see it in a lot of different ways and I'll talk about some of them. But before we go,
that did any of you watching norm, Macdonald's new show on Netflix debuted on Friday. I did. I thought it was pretty funny, especially the David Spade Interview
The funniest part about it was
it's obviously nor Mcdonald and David Spade have known each other a long time, which was what made it fun 'cause. They were just teasing each other, but the funny part was that
the norm kept pretending he was going to commercial break, and then it was
clear if there really is a commercial break, because it's Netflix so David
I could never really tell if they were just talking or if they were talking on for the show who's got a Larry is because I don't know if you ever figured it out. It was sort of like this great, a spontaneous practical joke anyway check around this
get a chance. So here are some signs that the anti trump are running out of ammo number one
Michael Moore, who is promoting his new anti trump movie, was
suggesting that maybe trump himself or one of his one of his minions.
Were the ones who wrote the New York Times anonymous piece that was anti trump so now
The words Michael Moore is speculating aloud. There may be-
hum himself or somebody asked: do it wrote the
enemas this article that was showing that Trump was being managed by other
in the White House. Now the reasoning,
Michael Moore, gave Ann
First of all, we don't know if Michael Moore really believes us, we can only. We can only report what he said.
This is in the movie production or movie.
Motion mode
So when you're in movie promotion mode, you're going to say things like get headlines, even if it's not exactly what you're thinking, so you have to put the contacts on there
but he was willing to say in public Michael Moore was that maybe Trump had this written because it showed that there were adults in charge
Another words, one of the big big stories about the
humanity, anonymous New York Times editorial was that people were taking taking memos off of the president's death.
They were figuring out ways to control his crazy impulsiveness and I'm thinking, if
your worst criticism of the President wait for it. If you're
worst criticism of the president, at least lately is
He may be the person who's criticizing himself, that's it
the worst criticism of the president is that he might be the one who secretly criticizing himself but isn't
and that's the second part, but isn't that
that feels a lot like out of ammo. Doesn't it that's the
Pretty much out of ammo
Here's another one bill Maher apparently said talking about Kavanaugh and talk
about how the left was using this attack of the
the anonymous accusation from high school
even Bill Maher, who is anti Trump said. You're
making our side look bad? So if you can,
even get Bill Maher.
Side? Again
as the President. I don't think
Your attack is very effective if you can't get Bill Maher to say, yeah, that's a good attack of the president.
You can't even get your own side on board,
Right, that's another sign that the anti
tempers are running out of ammo
then there's a more visible sign, which you could say
may well it's because of the hurricane. The hurricane is wiping everything off of the off of the head.
Lines, but I don't know that that would be a good enough reason. You know,
at least online
on the internet,
you're not really running out of space, so if there
for a story that was that was really truly bad for Trump. I think they'd find room for it somewhere on the first page, but there really isn't much there there's just not much news.
Anti trump at the moment, maybe because of the hurricane, but that can't explain all of it all right. Here's a
here's another sign that they're running out of ammo. There was a hit piece just so I I don't see an end. Yes CNN or MSNBC. I forget which one I just saw a hit piece on: Tucker Carlson,.
They're so out of ammo? That's third, the third attack,
someone who simply likes the president or not likes but
supports the president more than other people do they're like
so completely out of ammo the thinking all right. Well, who can we shoot? We can't we got nothing for the president, how about Tucker Carlson? How about doctor?
That's the closest! That's all we got, and here was here
Who is the most insulting thing that this hit piece on? Tucker Carlson came up with, so there were.
The L statements like what happened to him
you seem so nice, but what happened to him and then
you get down to what what happened to him? What's your analysis
What is what was he and what is he now? What happened to him and the worst insult that I could find in it was his latent racism. That's it
latent racism. Do you know who else has latent racism.
Human beings.
Human beings? That's who has latent racism.
That's the whole fucking problem. Sorry, I didn't mean to swear
but the reason that racism is even a problem,
in the world and is a continuous pervasive
never goes away? Problem is
human beings have latent racism
another words I have sort of a
flex in them to like the other less than they like themselves.
You sort of baked into being a human being now the test
Is not whether you have a latent racism? That's just everybody. The test is what you do about it.
Is Tucker putting on the sheet and dancing with KKK nope he's doing the opposite. If you look at
if you actually listen to his words,
the opposite of racism. Clearly talker like most of us most of us,
figured out how to control whatever late in bed bad impulses.
They were born with whatever, whatever their dna gifted them. With most of us.
Can figure out how to put a layer of
Society on that civilization and try to tamp down are bad impulses,
There's nobody who doesn't have.
A little bit of rate latent racism, it doesn't matter what color you are your autumn
Klay born with a
instinct to like people who look like you more than the people who don't look like you, that's just how you're born it's, what you do with it that determines who you are
Here's another sign that the
anti trumpers are running out of ammo, and I talked about this before, but I'm going to go back to this
point over and over in my periscopes, because
the more you see of it
the more impactful it is, the more it will change how you think. Alright
So I went through a few articles, Anti Trump articles on CNN and I pulled out the specific criticisms
And when I say the specific criticisms that sort of
oxymoron, because these are
very unspecific criticisms, so
show generic and vague- and
All these are so these are all the things that people said about the president. The anti trumpers said about him and see. If you could figure out,
what problem any of this cost. Okay,
is unstable and also highly unstable and
He's unhinged on impulsive, his dictatorial
is reactionary. He's he's bad. All the cell salt in the press
raise serious questions about checks and balances out of control. He dangerous
there's a leader such as him. That's a phrase
such as him. So what's that mean speculation,
about his temperament? Dark portrait
to love him by somebody else. He's a divisive figure. No details
the emotional declarations seem manipulative talking about him. They say his emotional declarations seem manipulative Disney. A politician.
He has a majority of an eight year old boy with the in security of a teenage girl and then there's manner
may know what the Russians wanted. He may.
And I also
they grow wings and fly I mean that's.
May may know something is a pretty big category or some
it could be very bad now here now did you notice,
that none of those attacks against the President have any specific meaning that you could tie to an actual event that you could tie to a bad
so there's nothing like. Let's just pick one of these out of the list. He
impulsive and there
therefore he did XX turned out poorly. Where is that
Remember that Woodward said that specific examples are the building blocks of journalism.
There are no building blocks? It's all generic
impulsive, he's unhinged, but how did that?
How did unhinged affect anything which disk
when was it, that was in the unhinged. Why did
This is unhinged, this hurt us it's kinda, vague God, vague,
and then there's the category I call mind reading this is where some,
very criticizes. The president based
what they imagine. He thinks that's, not a thing
we don't know what other people are thinking, we can tell what they're doing half the time anyway,
Sometimes we can't even tell that, but we certainly
can't tell what people are thinking, so here's here's something
from CNN. These phrases taught so these are phrases
the people were referring to the present he's determined to prove two things: Izzy.
How do you know what the president is determined to do? You can
What he does
You can't really tell what he's the
and to do that is mind, reading about his hatred, for others, his hatred for others, and so what's that you know.
Who's he talking about? Are you reading his mind, 'cause he hasn't expressed in words
So how do you know about his hatred for others? His
relations are transparent. Somebody said: are they
are his motivations, transparent
Do you know what motivations rarely are transparent? You know
I mean, so you can guess why you think somebody is doing something. You know there's some that are uh,
But when you're saying his motivations are transparent, why don't
just say what his motivation is and then say why that's true,
why do you need to be general about it? How about his death?
higher to be seen as more humane. Well.
Can you think of anybody who doesn't have a desire to be seen as humane, especially a politician,
Is there a politician who you could,
say that about. Well, you know Joe Biden
he doesn't like to be seen as humane. It's not a thing.
Every politician wants to be seen as humane and if
criticizing him on that that domain? Well, of course, his true emotional nature is cold. Is it who knows who knows the
This is true emotional nature. How would you even know that and then you look for the phrase he wants you,
I saw it several times. I wrote it down once talking about the president. He wants this. He wants that. He wants that
Now, there's some things you can say unambiguously: he wants to build a wall. Yeah there's some things that he said.
And so when you say what he wants to talk about what he said? He wants that's fair, but if you say he wants
and you fill in something that he's never said, that's
reporting, that's mind, reading all right, so look
yes and I'm going to add to my list as we go, look for the vague you know it's Starkey ISM,
Also, the views, unhinged etcetera,
Another tell now this next tell is the the most hidden,
and someone that you wouldn't notice, if I didn't tell you
because I am a professional writer. I am
it was written books and written articles.
There's. Some things that are professional writer would know that you would
necessarily know, and it goes like this.
If you're writing for a news organizations, this has more to do with the news industry
you would never in the context of news.
Use the word very or the word highly. I said no
her, but also often that sometimes you would.
But they're, not words that
I would use in good writing. So, in other words, there's an article about the president in which he is called highly unstable. I think that's the one yeah
highly unstable. So this is an article that got past the editors, the professional
professional writer wrote it professional editor.
Or at least one thought, so there were two professional writers who saw saw the words highly unstable,
the president. Do you know what's wrong with that sentence, highly
highly is a word: you should just get rid of any professional writer.
Would know that the word unstable covers it,
you would get rid of the word highly because
It doesn't add anything and it just makes it sentence longer. Every
Fessional writer knows that,
Why is the word highly still in the article when
really the author who wrote it and the editor who sought both know it doesn't belong there. Why?
because the word unstable didn't get it done
even though the word unstable does get it done another word,
as a as a writer the word
Unstable says it all: once
Table is kind of an absolute right. You don't
need to be highly unstable, you're, just
unstable.
This whole range of we don't know. What's going to happen, 'cause, it's unstable the
getting the highly signals to the audience
The even the writer knew
The word unstable didn't mean anything.
Or didn't mean enough. It was too inert, so they,
at Lisette. This president is unstable and thought I don't know the way I
all about the president is not being
captured in the word. That is totally accurate.
See where I'm going on this, the
accurate word did not convey how they felt.
So they had to write it poorly to make it feel something
they had to imbue it with their emotion because they
Let me just lay on the page being just an objective word about whether he's unstable
no. I don't. I don't know it said that in that context, objective doesn't mean true. It just means that it doesn't have
highly on and then one one of these articles also said use. The word very,
v e r y. If you
put the word very in front of something.
Professional writing. Your editor should be crossing that out because
If you were to say, for example, impulsive versus very impulsive
Generally, your editor would take the very end of that sentence because it's not adding so look for.
Look for very and highly and other words that professional writers wouldn't normally use, but they need to they need to throw in
still they need a little extra. They knew they needed some seasoning.
But it wasn't enough. The words just were too flat. So look for that.
It diminishes, meaning that is correct,
writer should avoid adverbs. That is the lesson. Yes, writers should avoid. Adverbs, don't put descriptors, tear adjectives, I'm just looking at your the tangerine tyrant, a guy like that one somebody culture of the ten.
Three in tyrant, it's kind of kind of cute. Maybe the editors were the ones who added it. May
maybe you can't rule that out, but that would be a very une. Editor thing to do is
everything you might allow the writer to do under the theory that it's a it's an editorial and it's their opinion, so they can write it the way they want to write it. As long as the grammar is correct,
but it's unlikely that the at the editor added it it's possible, but it's unlikely I win very bigly versus swimmingly
so the title of my book is win bigly. What? If the title had
win very badly and it wouldn't be better.
John Kerry to lose security clearance yeah
check the John Kerry Stuff and it's just sort of making my head shake like a what is happening
why is he doing that? Well on one hand, apparently it's legal or
Legal enough. The Logan ACT as ancient and not going to be used, but.
I was starting to wonder if maybe Kerry is accidentally useful,
an I'm not going to go full conspiracy, theory and say John Kerry
actually a patriot and his secret.
Working with the administration. It just looks like he's. Not, I don't believe that. So I don't believe it's part of a clever plan, but-
consider what's going on here, you've got John Kerry talking to,
the Ayatollah and say: hey. You know yeah, oh well,
Maybe we'll try to go light on you and then you've got President Trump who's going much scarier.
It's starting to look at this and I mean in an accidental way a little bit
good cop, bad cop right so
good cop bad cop,
cops in charge? So do you think
some point where the Ayatollah says,
Kerry, you have to help us, please John Kerry.
Tell us how we can get out of this and the good cops
Kerry could say well
We recommend that you wait it out 'cause. I think he said that right, wait it out.
And then the Ayatollah consult some.
Experts on the United States and he realizes that President Trump is favored to win a second, let a second reelection,
So waiting it out means six years.
And if you wasted out for six years, what happens at the end of that? Do we get another Republican, so think it?
but John Kerry's reported
place and I don't think we can really know what those two people are saying in private right. Well carries not
directly to the I told he's talking to somebody at like Secretary of state level, whatever that is in red and is
seems to me that carries advice.
Is so bad. There is
Most intentionally bad because way
six years when your when your economy,
he is on the edge of destruction.
And you might have a year to go before full full out.
Social revolution.
Wait it out.
Is sort of the worst
device anybody ever gave. Anybody, isn't it because the
there's one thing I can say for sure.
IRAN needs to sort of do something kind of soon, because their whole country is coming apart. The bolts are just coming out.
Now it doesn't look like a wave six years situation into Maine
now, maybe you could say oh Kerry, is sure that in two years somebody will be the president or he'll be impeached or something well.
Maybe but you don't know that and uh
How do sure waiting two years is a good idea and then
a a Democrat comes to office. John Kerry's best case scenario is that
Democrat immediately, say: hey, let's just loosen up on IRAN, they haven't
you know they've been doing everything that they were doing. The funding terrorism cheating on nukes, but let's just be good to him. Now
I don't know if that would be a good political move, even by a Democrat, because it's one thing
to take away the deal, but isn't
the thing to just give them stuff? If there's been
good behavior between now and then and we're not expecting to be a lot see a lot of good behavior. So I feel, as
this is John Kerry thing. My end up the opposite of of what we assume would happen:
because if you're, a man looking for all your options out right,
So one of the options out of your situation is capitulation. Where
say: okay, we don't want to be in a permanent economic war with the United States.
There's only one way out, we just got to pull back our. You know our adventurism, you know that we got it. We got to pull back.
From trying to influence anything that isn't our own country. So
yeah that would mean being more transparent about getting rid of their nukes. It would mean not supporting terrorists and everything else. So that's one path and that's the path that the president has largely laid out for them
yeah you can have a good life and a good economy and good relations. You can have all that stuff. We want to give you all the stuff we like around, we like to people over, and we just have a problem with the leadership, so that path is very clear.
If the leaders of IRAN.
Find a way politically ego, wise, religiously, etc psychologically to go that direction, but they don't like it.
That's their least favorite direction, so they're looking for alternatives, and
Kerry comes and then, who knows more than John Kerry about the United States and IRAN and the situation very
People who would be would be one of the most
knowledgeable.
Please inform people on this entire topic and they talked to John Kerry and they say John,
we don't like that. One path that's been presented us to us by Mean President Trump
We need another option, John Kerry, can you save us?
and John Kerry says
John Kerry says well
Maybe you could wait it out just wait, but John Kerry, our economy
is falling apart. We may have only months left before complete economic collapse.
We do what should we do? John Kerry? Nothing? How about nothing? Just wait!
But did you hear us our whole economy is collapsing? Everything is falling apart. The wheels are coming off. We need to act fast.
What should we do? My professional advice is the way that the
So you're saying the President Trump will:
not be in office, because Russia or Russia investigation pretty soon pretty soon he will be impeached
move from office. You haven't been right about that. Yet have you
I'm reading that there's no actual evidence of collusion,
we're reading in the american press the
In Bob Woodward couldn't find that a sniff of it.
And he looked pretty hard? Well, he is not. Molar is he's done Miller,
so we should bet our entire country on the fact that the thing,
for which there is no evidence. Is
the true logically and rationally, you should yes, that's what I'll do I'll just wait to wait it out. John Kerry, did you think Trump would get elected the first time? What I'm the first time when you predicted that the the last election did, you predict the trump would get all
Well, not exactly what other people were wrong.
So you would like
just about our entire future
of our regime in our country, uh
your prediction about the presidency, which has so far in terms of trouble anyway
not been right about anything. Nothing
you haven't been right about. One thing for three years
John Kerry,
you're telling us that we should better regime on your predicted.
Ability about Trump. Is that right? Well, I don't have much time here. I think my times up, I've gotta go spread, some goodness to the rest of the world. Goodbye sing.
So correct me. If I'm wrong.
The most knowledgeable person on this situation
who are ran, believes is, on their side, can
He has done a good job, I'm guessing it looks like he's
good job of making IRAN think that he's actually on their side,
and the guy who knows the most?
is on their side
it's given them? One alternative to deal.
With President Trump, the way he'd like to be dealt with, which is stop your adventurism
one alternative and that alternative depended on John.
Very being good at predicting what happens with Donald Trump, although he has a track record of being wrong about everything. Every single thing.
I don't know if I had a nemesis like you have
pick your own nemesis.
And you know you went to President Trump and say, look president trump- you get to pick your own nemesis. What do you mean pick, my
Nemesis well, you're going to have a nemesis. You know somebody who is always try.
To undermine you working behind the scenes to try to
yep you and make everything
partner, yoga, Nemesis nemesis,
just always against you and stuff, because, okay, if you get to pick your own really from anybody, the like the whole world, I could pick anybody as my nemesis,
because you can you name it anybody and will sign them to be your nemesis.
I can imagine thinking about that and thinking maybe about Joe Biden and he's like. No
now he's not even close enough to be a good nemesis about how a John Kerry he'd be a good nemesis.
You know seems serious enough, but yet can't do anything right, perfect
it will make me look stronger to be John Kerry
then Joe Biden, because it's hard to take Joe Bidens seriously. He has some deep state tapes coming out.
Well, every time O'Keefe has some tapes coming out. I always say the same thing, which is
Let's wait till we see him. Let's wait till. We see him
Because I don't know what the I don't know what it means to have some deep state tapes coming out, because the deep state is just the government
And people in the government have opinions some of them like the president's some. Don't I don't know what that means to say you have some tapes about the deep state somebody said they would pay to
the smoke with me on the interface by one, how Bap well someday you might.
Kerry was bribed by, and somebody says well less
seems unlikely, given his age and patriotism and wealth he'd be pretty hard to bribe. So he's got that going, for there are some for twenty experts there. Some cultivation experts on interface.
So if you haven't used the interface by when Hub app, yet you should sign up because going forward, I'm going to be taking questions.
Through the app. So when I do my periscope I'll put
keyword, it's not there right now, but in the future.
Anybody who has the app can call me up now. The app is meant to charge people for calls. But when you sign up you get some free tokens, the called the when WH
and that's our own cryptocurrency. So just signing up gives you some. You know some free ones of those, so everybody can make some free calls using the when that comes with the sign up, and so you don't have to pay what's happened is free calls yeah the difference between what's up and the interface apple's interface is made for people who have something to offer that they can charge for it's. Not it's not meant just for a phone call, so it's for billing billing people for your expertise or your time, all right, you're, welcome, repeat the app name is called Interface, so the
the app name is just interface, but if you're searching for it look for interface by when Hub, when how does one word w h, e n? H? U B when looking for a veterinarian, the other night? No luck yeah! So the the big guy
the challenge with an app like this is sort of the same challenges, a dating app. You need, you need people on there, for
be useful, so we're trying the next month or so we're trying to get enough experts to sign on
because remember signing on is free and you just
say that you're available and stick it in your pocket. You don't have to do anything and if somebody calls you and you're available take the goal make some money. It's easy,
Only when they're online, so you have to spell-
slide that you're online and that you're available for a call um and people are asked me to talk about the fake weather.
The fake news about the weather, where people are pretending the the weather is worse than it is. You know you've. I don't have anything that
that it's funny when they do it, I understand why the news does it makes it more
just the same. I I don't have a problem with any of it. Really, yes, the interface app is a video phone call sort of like a Facetime phone call, but you can use it across across platforms, so you can make a call,
all from from your enjoyed or apple phone in is a video call with an expert or somebody was charging for their time. It doesn't matter what they're charging for could be for. Conversation could be because,
there famous could be it's a famous person. Who's got money is going to charity, so it could be anything. You want to change charge for your time,
Anne. I will tell you more about that, but I'll talk to you tomorrow, bye.
Transcript generated on 2019-11-12.