Unemployment, bump, bump bump bump bump bump bump bump hey Joe any Jenny, Scott welcome to coffee with Scott Adams. The weekend edition he can he Chris, he sharona Andy, fuzzy and Nikki good to see you all here, and I know that because you're, the type of people who were responsible and prepared, not to mention smarter than usual and inexplicably sexy yeah, I'm talking about you, doctor

are you, I know the you have prepared for coffee was Scott Adams by preparing your favorite beverage, it might be in a glass mug, the Stein, a vessel of some sort. I prefer a coffee, you might go a different way, but join me now for the simultaneous at. You're probably wondering what the air quality looks like at my house in northern California,

you're looking out my window, so this is my view. So the tree is, the you can see are there's a focus. The trees you can see are literally, my neighbor's tree is so those are close. Everything behind it is obscured from view so the the fires I think, through over a hundred and fifty miles away, now a magic this. This is my air quality in Pleasanton, California, and so I'm in the Bay area. The fires- I think the closest one- is like a hundred and fifty hundred seventy miles away. Something like that- and this is my air quality. Imagine if you're within ten miles,

were fifty miles. So this is, this is don't go outside air quality. Some of you saw the president's tweet blaming California for poor forest management, and people said my god. You can't say that when People are people are in the middle of the fire. To which I say, I think it depends. If it's true- and I don't know if it's true do you is California, a bad at forest management? Does that have anything to do with anything? I don't know I'd like to see some fact checking on that I'm seeing people online blame the increase in forest fires on climate change.

Which I don't rule out, I don't think you can rule it out, but I'd like to know all the factors. One of the factors might be that there are more people stomping around doing dumb, and what are the factors might be forest management But I don't know anything about that topic and I don't know how you did how you would know so people are saying yes, that forest management is it. You, but let's see some more information on that from from qualified people all right. So my brother, who's location, I won't reveal to you- is

also in California, but he's already lost his internet and cable connection and he's, I guess the fire is six miles away and he's an evacuation. So my brother is getting ready to abandon his own to the fire. Anytime. Now I think, probably there's more there's more chance. That smoke would be an issue where he is then fire, but I could be wrong because that fire could come right and, as you might imagine I know, I know quite a few people who are in the the fire zone so I'll be worried about today anyway, let's talk about other, Things are happening watching the devious and diabolical work of the enemy of the people,.

The enemy of the people being the fake news industry. Whoever they might be, especially as the fake news is the dangerous kind. So here's the fake news, this being spread by CNN right now, which is by the reporting, the racist reporting and by the way you see it. This one for racist now, so they're not hiding it anymore. They used to be a little bit. I don't baby little bit more clever about it and they are reporting that the president is singling out black women for criticism. Now, that's just a lie. That's fake news, because he's criticize everybody from Mccrone and France to Jim Acosta

to whoever that guy was a stood next to Jim Acosta, it's hard to Think of anybody who hasn't criticized this week at least anybody who's on the other side, so so the reality is he criticizes everybody and Actually, really good news that that there are so many African african women in important jobs. They have swim jobs weather in the line of fire same as Jim Acosta, why is Jim Acosta in the president's line of fire Jim Acosta is a really good job why are the other women that Trump is is a well? He did like it they allege, but the other, the other women that he insulted, What do they have in common okay

If you see it, then what you say they have in common is that they're black women, if you are not a fucking racist You say that what they have in common is excellent jobs. I apologize for the cursing, sometimes it just so, but I'm watching the enemy of the people, the fake news industry report. It like it's fact that the president's singles out black women for insults. When right in front of our eyes, we observe, Is that not to be the case there? He insults all of his enemies, his critics and he's is to all of his friends. It's pretty consistent. If you can't notice that you ought to be in the news industry, so I think CNN has now just disgraced itself and going full racist with that claim, because

so. The essence of it is is that his supporters, or even on his giant racist scheme, but if this is the kind of shit that they that they used to, to make their case they are the enemy of the people. There's no other way to spin this anymore. There's no other way to spend it their full racist enemy of the people at this point, that and said one of their biggest complaints, and I think Bernie Sanders said. The same thing is that there was a racist that the midterms we're a racist camp and then some of the races, the individual races were racist

in particular, there was a racist ad that was so bad according to CNN, even Fox NEWS wouldn't run it. It was that racist. Here's my take on that. I saw the ad and the first thing I thought is: oh crap people are going to say this is racist and then people will complain and if Fox NEWS, you have a obligation to your stockholders and when people complain and there's enough of it complaints, you have to act because you're you're that kind of a company. So is it true what Fox NEWS is I'm sorry, what CNN is reporting that even Fox NEWS won't run this ad, because it's so racist. That is not true. That is fake news. What is true,

the Fox NEWS is not running the ads. That's true. What is not true is the reason. Cnn says it's obvious that they're not doing it because even in their minds, they know it's racist Fox NEWS has never said that They may have said which would be completely consistent with every corporation. They may have said. We can't take the heat, this worth it, so we don't want the advertising money 'cause, the complaints are great, then the value of the advertising money now that yeah good reason not to run that because the Corp, mission can handle that kind of pressure. That's very different from saying the Fox NEWS decided: the ads were racist, so they wouldn't run them. So it's fake news now, I'm not saying that they could be that chose the wrong. All I'm saying, If the news is based on mind, reading another

CNN's assumption of what Fox news people are thinking I haven't said if they're, judging their thinking. From what they're doing, I would say, They've got one explanation which fits the data. If Fox NEWS thought it was racist, be a perfectly good reason not to run the ad. But why they think that in the first place Why did they run it in the first place? I'll tell you why It ran it in the first place because when looked at it? It didn't look racist to them when the public looked at it and the half of the country. That's that's completely hypnotized by the enemy of the people, Those people said my god. This is clearly racist, this just like Willie Horton situation when they said it's just like the Willie Horton situation. What kind of logic were they using Was it an analogy? Yes, it was

they were making an analogy to the Willie Horton ad, which I think is less it's less ambigu The Willie Horton ad Willie was racist, it's hard to defend that and why the Willie Horton ad was racist because of all the minerals in the world did you have to pick the black guy now I understand that this particular criminal had an especially bad record. So It was extra scary, but I don't think anybody's believing that he was randomly picked and he just happened to be black. I'm sure there were plenty of white criminals that they could have picked from. So the Willie Horton AD, sir? play all of your antenna should have gone up and you should say well. Why did you pick the black guy? Ok little hard to defend

although I'm sure they did defend it by saying he's a real person we didn't make it up, but still doesn't feel right now Compare that to the border question. What type of people are coming across the border. People who live below the border. The people who are coming across the border, whether they be awesome, people which I think most of them actually are uh. I'm actually quite pro immigrant from an emotional. You know just a human level, I'm very pro immigrant from a systems perspective you have to have good systems, have a good country in good outcomes. It gets more complicated, but. Is it true that, with all those people come in, some of them would be criminals that feels unambiguously true did the

add that neither fox nor see would run because they, because the impression they gave did they haven't option of showing people who did not live south of the border. Not really. This is. This is almost exactly the opposite of the Willie Horton situation, showing the people who are essentially one hundred percent of the people coming across the border. Rp who live across the border. Those are the only people who can come in illegally from south of the border. Are people who live s of the border

so showing somebody in particular- and you know this- the particular cop killer that they showed was a horrible person, but in the context of a campaign that the whole point of a campaign that is not to show an accurate picture of the world, none of them do that they're, trying to show the worst case. Scary picture. That's what all political commercials do. They're all complete bullshit some are worse than others, but they're all

that's what they are so the showing that there is danger coming from below the border? Is typical campaign stuff, making you more afraid of something? Then you should pay. What do the? What do the Democrats do in their campaign finance? Well, the Democrats make you afraid of just different stuff. They make you afraid of your of your citizens, letters in the same country. So the only difference between the Democrats and Republicans is that the republican ads are demonising people who don't live in the country and are trying to get in illegally they're not demonising people who are coming in legally, no matter what they look like. You have you ever seen a republican ad campaign ad that demonized people who were legally in the country

not in recent time. I can't think one, probably not, since you know I can think what has that ever happened. So both sides are demonising a portion of the human population. The Democrats are demonising Republicans. Essentially painting them all as ignorant. Racists, who are dangerous, literally dangerous and Republicans are or portraying the illegal immigration as being especially dangerous. Now. Both of them are exaggerating because it's a political context, so you have to put it in context that it's yeah exaggerating so the enemy of the people has now created this fake narrative, which causes people like Antifa to feel comfortable, camping out on tuck,

Carlson's doorstep and terrorizing, whoever was inside, which happened to be his wife, and I asked in a tweet I asked the following question: has anybody asked Don lemon? I just pick him as one of the enemy well as anybody else Don lemon if he feels responsible for him to follow up and showing up on Tucker Carlson stores that, because what they were complaining about, Tucker their complaints were right off of c and then it's like they just took the CNN talking points put on masks and walked up to Tucker's door. Now. How you feel about all of this depends on how you feel about the base claim, which is that the people are or are not racists 'cause, you would feel perhaps less

say, less empathy for somebody who was straight up racist. You know maybe you'd care less, but Carlson clearly is not that I mean he to have a more public record? You know if you want to check his record, it's all there. He It's a lot is on tv, a lot you can look at it yourself. They need. They just need to produce one clip. One piece of right any evidence of their claim. And then maybe we could talk about it, but I haven't seen that of you instead, we see that the enemy of the people have hypnotised half the country, including anti fa, to think that there are monsters among us and that they appear on Fox news. Yes, there was a pen click, you heard uh

so let me say again that I think the temperature of the public probably went down a little. I'm talking about the average that, isn't even watching news, necessarily just the average public. I think when Democrats won the house One of the three legs of the the Trump criticisms just disappeared. One of those legs was that Trump a dictator and that he was going to run roughshod over the rest of the government. Well, now that, House is owned by the Democrats one of the biggest three things you're worried about just sort of went away. It was never true and they're, not really realizing that it was never true but

in fact that it went away so easilly, meaning that the president said. Congratulations and I think I can work with Nancy Pelow see he didn't. Say: let's overturn the result, let's ignore Congress. He said, let's see if we can work together, that's exactly what happened so that one way and at the same time, talked about how the president was so public doing all of his rally doing an eighty seven minute. You know public press conference covering all kinds of and in none of that, does he look mentally deranged? That's wrong word in none of that did he look like he had some kind of a mental problem which this is the other leg of the stool. So that's two legs that just got kicked out of the stool three. If you count, if you count the Russia probe, this stool has

multiple legs, as as many legs as my analogy once it half and all. That's left. Is imagining what's in the president's head, think about it all of the complaints that they had about the president that were a fact based are being disproven alright. So one of the fact based predictions about this president is that he would be bad for the economy. Well, then, now the facts have clearly shown that the economy is thriving under president Trump. You could argue about who gets how much credit and that sort of thing, but can't argue anymore, that he's bad for the economy now- some people have argued yeah. But what about the deficit to which I say, Nobody even knows what a government deficit is. It's not like personal debt, unlike you, the

It doesn't actually have to pay its debt. I know some of you just want what what do you mean the It doesn't have to pay its debt if it doesn't it'll default them now. No, all the government just has to pay the interest on the debt. You can't do that eventually, if you have a business or personal loan as an individual or as a company. Eventually you have to pay it off right after you've paid it down. You can talk about refinancing and getting other but even if you ever revolving credit, you kind of have to pay it down. The government doesn't need to do that. The government can simply pay the inflated pay, the interest rate and wait for inflation to take. What is a gigantic number down to a small number, but of course it could only do that if it's not adding to the debt more than it's deflated. But the point is

it's not like regular debt, so people who are looking at the economy and saying this is terrible. Don't really understand how our national debt works. The other thing people don't understand is that I understood this is my my factual belief subject. Your fact checking that the percentage of death is actually not as high as it's been in the past. So as a as a a number, it's the biggest number it's ever been, but as a percentage of GDP. I believe

spend higher in the past. So there's that and the other thing people don't understand is that when interest rates are low, that's a good time to borrow a bunch of money and interest rates have been low for awhile. So it's actually pretty good time to rack up some debt. If your intention is to stimulate the economy and if you think in the long run, you have a way to trim that debt later. If you if it's going to go up forever? You've got problems, but you should be paying down the debt when the interest rate is high and I think the interest rate was higher during the bill Clinton years. Wasn't it so that would have been in time to pay down the debt as Clinton and under Obama and under Trump, even even on Obama and Trump,

if the interest rates were low, so it's probably a good time to run up some debt and use other peoples, money, anyway. The point is, nobody really knows how much debt is too much but uh. We all feel like we're economists, when we talk about this thing, somebody says this is a dumb. Thing, I've ever heard you left out your reasons: hey, it was probably an oversight. Did you This is an accidentally leave out the reason, or is it just dumb, because it's not what you think, because if you and I are talking to each other and you think, I'm in India and I think, you're an idiot- we can't tell- what's- we can't tell- which way. Is right, so I can't rule it out I can't rule out that everything I say in these periscopes or even just that one thing is completely stupid. Can't rule it out, but if you hold it down on your end,

we've already identified who's. The dumb one here hum alright, so my point being that the factual stuff about the president is being disproven at a fairly. Clip. He hasn't, he hasn't blown up the world. He is not active crazy. He is not gotten richer as far as we can tell he's, probably gotten poorer, so you have to If all of the facts are not lining up, you have to you have to back up to mine So CNN, the enemy of the people And by the way you know, the president has been saying that fake news is the enemy of the people, but I don't think there's a distinction anymore. It feels to me that CNN has just gone. Over to the dark side and they're, not they're, not they're, no longer even trying to present the news. Uh

because most of the reporting is about the president and the way they present, the president is so obviously opinion dressed up as news that I don't know if you can make that distinction anymore about the fake news. Versus CNN. It feels like they've they've, completely gone over to the the darkest of the dark side this is literally evil. This is actual literal evil. But I almost wonder if they even know it. Thank if you were to talk to somebody from CNN Early any of the honor of talent, if you get them in a room privately and talk them, what they know. What they're doing, because. I actually don't know the answer that and I try to be consistent

about not reading minds of other people and and just observing, what's happening, you can observe that what they are they're, what they're promoting as news is clearly not true and clearly slanted for for a narrative, I mean that part is obvious. It's it's obvious on both sides right. Nobody is doubting that anymore, but we don't know exactly what they're thinking and I'm actually I'm actually genuinely curious. There are some people and I would say, yeah Navarro something. Somebody mentioned her name, Probably in the category of you know if you're just going to bat without actually knowing, because again we can't read their minds. I would bet that there's a mixture of. People who really believe what they're saying and some of them who don't by they're sort of going along with it, and I love to know what that breakdown is. I feel like

I can tell by looking at their demeanor, but I think that's probably my imagination, um anyway, so the enemy that people is working hard, this week. Look for the number of stories where my reading is the primary thing they have to buy into to buy the rest of the story. All right will I go on Bill Maher again, I don't see the slightest chance the bill Maher would invite me on the show again. Do you do you think there's even the smallest chance that I could ever be on bill. Maher show again now keep in mind that might the parents are probably got pretty good ratings. As I said, something that was provocative that Trump would get get elected? I gave my reasons and I hear anybody push back so that That alone.

Been remarkable in the context of that show and then once I was proven right about all of the big stuff, you would think I would be the ideal person have back, but I would break their world so badly. If I came back the I don't know what I just don't know. If it could be done, I don't know if they could ever invite me back here. They can. They can certainly have people on the show who are conservatives not doubting that they can do that, but having personally on there with a long string of being right about things and in public and on that show in particular would break the narrative a little bit. They can always say you know. Steve Bannon he's the devil. He was the Before he still the devil so having Steve Bannon on the show. Doesn't doesn't challenge their worldview,

Having me on the show would definitely challenge their worldview and so, but things can happen, and I mean that literally I'm not I'm not just saying that for a fact. I don't think that that can happen. Like was a. I don't see any scenario in which I would be invited on CNN, because I've been too critical of the all right, let's talk about election fraud, we are watching. Marco Rubio five valiantly for some kind of a transparency in the vote in Broward, county and I've said this before, but Marco Rubio's is kind of a a good dude yeah I kind of like at least, since the presidential election is over? You know when

Rubio's in his presidential mode. I'm sorry when he's in his senator mode and he's just doing his job as a senator I really like the stuff that comes out of him seems pretty reasonable. He never seems crazy and he does seem to pick topics put a good yeah. I'm gonna view of good you for that good view. Point on them. You know whether you agree or not. He's he's a he's, a credible player by all appearances seems to be. You know, trying to get good results for the state in the country, but here's the thing to watch out for the the Broward vote. Counting situation is a fog of war. Situation, almost everything that we hear coming out of there for the next few days. You should assume is not credible.

It would not be credible. Coming from the other side, it would not be kredible coming from your own side, 'cause right now, there's a whole bunch of speculation. And a lot of mind reading there's a lot of mind. Reading. You know some of it won't be wrong. In other words, some of the things that people are suspecting about the other side, Will probably be right, but we can't really know 'cause. We can't read minds now part of what makes this interesting, is that the woman in charge, Brenda Snipes, is here's the best. I mean everything about the simulation and the script that we're watching here is so interesting in sometimes all the wrong ways, so while the enemy the people has been calling Trump a racist for criticizing black women. Why couldn't

since there's another powerful, successful black woman and again, how can we gloss over the fact that there are so many highly successful black women in the news, it's literally like the best news you've ever heard in your life, that there are that many successful black women working at the highest levels, the they can come under fire from the President of the United States. It's kind of it's got a good news, you know, but because the enemy of the people has set it up. So that They're they're saying the president keeps keeps going after black women yeah kind of tying his hands very cleverly by the way, I'm not saying it's. They don't lack, they don't lack skill said the skill level is pretty high:

but they've done a good job of inoculating this Brenda Snipes because there, They're they're telling the story that the President goes after black women, so she's already got a little protective shield around her thanks to the enemy of the people and but let me let me jump in and say this call, CNN the enemy of the people want to be really clear. Nobody should act on that in any physical, violent way I don't think anybody should be accosting them, no pun intended nobody should be accosting them in public but it should be showing up at their doorstep. Nobody should be doing anything physical or threatening to

He works as CNN, or anybody or anybody just anybody. What do you still can be true that there could be organized forces within the country that are working against the best interest of the country that can still be true, but we still live in a republic and there are ways to there are ways to fix things that don't require showing up at somebody's house. So don't do that. Let me be clear about that. So anyway, that my overall comment about the Broward County stuff is, I see what you see which is a lot of irregularities, but so far the irregularities have not. To the level of I

now. Is smoking gun the right word here? They have not risen to the level of my god. They all have to go to jail, but it could you can't rule it out now. Yeah, I see somebody saying come on come on Scott pleased to have you said that come on come on. It's obvious right. It's obvious. It's obvious things going on I'll get. Let me give you my opinion. It looks to main exactly the way it looks to you. On my irrational part of my brain. That makes most of my decisions. Just like you, everything I'm saying, looks like voter flock fraud. So trust me, I see the same thing you do. It all looks like voter fraud to Maine. It looks blatant, it looks obvious, but it's also the fog of

so the things that are being reported initially just take it with a grain of salt. If I had, if I had to place money on it, I don't know if you can bet on this. Could you bet in this? If I could bet on this on predict it, I would place a very large bet that there's a substantial fraud Non in Broward County this week, so if you can ask me to bet on it, that's easy. I would definitely about those happening. I don't know how big it is. You know I don't know if Could it really be tens of thousands of votes. I'm not going to rule that out. Say the odds of substantial fraud or close to one hundred percent Would you mostly agree with that the chance that there's something that you would call substantial and in turn

general fraud in Broward County, I think the odds of some of it being true, are close to one hundred percent. The odds of it being so big that third blatantly trying to steal an election is less than one hundred percent. Maybe eighty percent- maybe seventy five- maybe ninety five percent, but it's less than one hundred. So let's wait and see. You know it if it turns out that there is provable massive, intentional voter fraud in the 10s of thousands of votes, and they were literally trying to change the outcome of an election. You can't say I was wrong. Because I'm putting very high odds on that being the case, I'm just saying don't jump to one hundred percent, yet just

just maintain a little bit of healthy skepticism, and then you know, if you put it if you put in ninety percent or ninety nine percent on it at least you're part of the rational conversation. Yeah? If it turns out that it's eighty five thousand extra votes and it changes the election, then people got to go to jail. People have to go to jail. Um here's my idea, four checking voter results here, ready for this. That goes like this. You have an app just an app that anybody can download. Or if somebody gets a link by an email. They can click the link and it takes him to the app so they could download it and the app's only purpose wish they ask you who you vote.

Four and then have some way to to to compare that to how your vote was counted. I'm not sure if they can do that. But after you vote you can you tell who who it was? Who was the voter? Here's a dumb question: can the people counting the votes, associate the vote with an actual space, perfect individual. Do the voting? Does the voting process do that or does it remove the identity and just make it a a voting thinking? Somebody answer that question for me: there's a little delay here so um, so Let me just finish the point. The point was that randomly people would get a notification on the app they wouldn't be able to do it on their own, but randomly they would get a notification and the notification would say they are secrets that people are saying it's a secret ballot.

So how about we change that there's probably a way to associate the person and the vote in a way that still keeps at yeah I'll bet there's a way to randomize things or to hide identities, so that you can figure out if the person who has the app says yes, I voted this way that you can match it to the actual vote. So I think there would be a way to use a nap with some changes to the voting system so that you could guarantee that checked enough places to find any problems. So if you find several people in one city, the say I voted this way, but you can check in the vote, went the other way there you go, now one way you could adjust this is that there there must be plenty of people who would not care if their voting record was public

so. Maybe some people can say in go into the voting booth and say hey, I'm one of those people, I'm willing to be public, and if anybody wants to be private, they can still be private but I'm willing to be public and then maybe only those people use the app. As the ones who have given away their identity, and then you can, you can check, I think that might work. I'm. And and here's another question that I ask a probably yes this often, but if I were, if our voting system was so good, why do why you read why do recounts even exist? The whole? The fact that every

it has a recount system and that we do it often is it only in case of mistakes, really Is that the only reason we have recounts, because we might have made a mistake, to me. It seems that the fact that recounts are universally accepted probably suggests that the system is at least susceptible to corruption. Have you heard anything about Russia interfering with the midterms? Did I just realize that the biggest story in the world is the one that's not being told, It's a dog that isn't barking. Wouldn't we know by now if Russia tried to influence them in terms shouldn't that be the top line story on every news,

It should be the top line story, whether they did or they did not right 'cause. It's still the biggest story As long as Muller is still doing his thing, it should be still the biggest story. Russia did or did not, or we don't know influence the election. Where is that? Where is that story. There should be massive stories about how we cannot detect Russia doing thing with our election. How does that fit with Trump can't manage Russia? How does any of that with the story that Trump is a russian pop? How? How do we explain that? Apparently, Putin allowed Democrats to win the house and didn't seem to do anything to stop. Does that seem like boon in and Trump or working together? There's a big.

Problem in the narrative that Trump and Putin are working together and there? big problem in the narrative that Trump is not doing enough to prevent Russia from messing with our elections, as it looks to me, like Russia got on a dodge or they're so clever that they got away with it. This time plus, I feel like we with at least have some rumors that they were doing something we don't even have rumors about Russia interfering with mid terms. Do it it might be because Democrats, one do you think if republicans had prevailed in the house, that we would have no stories about rip about Russians. Influencing the election. There's no way to know you have to ask that question, don't you you have to question I was speaking of asking the question so when I tweeted that

there's somebody should ask Don lemon whether his actions were influencing Antifa. His answer should be the same as Trump's. Which is from the legal legal perspective. You don't blame people who are talking for people who are acting so the legal perspective, of course, Don Lemon has no responsibility for Antifa, but also, of course, President Trump Has no legal responsibility for any of these mass shooters but are both of them involved in raising the temperature, by departing from, let's say, a strict, factual description of reality, and the answer is yes, yes from so from a scientific perspective. There still a thing called because of the fact- and it is certainly seems really reasonable to us

Mmhm that anybody who's raising the temperature is responsible for things that happen when you raise the temperature and it's quite clear that both the President and CNN do that they get people pretty worked up. I'm no stories of voter suppression. I guess that's true. There were lots of stories where people were attempting. There were stories that people were going to attempt voter suppression, but I haven't seen the story about actual voter suppression. That's a good point, I'm not saying there isn't any. I just haven't seen any stories. Um somebody love my broadcast from last night. That's interesting! I'm so.

Heated rhetoric and never heard anybody. That's not true heated rhetoric as her lots of people. In what world has heated rhetoric, never heard anybody. Heated rhetoric probably hurts more people than anything else. Is that always escalates not always, but you can ask. Bernie and Michael Moore are cleanings suppression, so I may not, maybe I'm just now seeing those stories are not on the front. Page of CNN were all of the protests on Thursday,

peaceful. Is it my imagination or were the protests against uh Jeff sessions? Firing were those protests, the lowest enerji protests you've ever heard of it barely made the news. There were a few pictures of it and then there's like a because. Trump messes with the minds of his critics so thoroughly that he had them protesting. To keep somebody they didn't want and they desperately didn't, want was the strangest thing. You've ever seen, Paypal shut down Tony Robinson's account that can't be true um or you mean Tommy Robinson.

It was very low energy protest, and so I will read it reiterates my prediction because it yet so so my prediction is so counter to what you're, observing that you should yeah. Okay, talk, Tommy Robinson uh. My prediction is so counter to what you think you're watching that it should shock you, and you should think I'm wrong but remember how many times I predict the things that you thought were wrong quite a few times right. So here's another one. I think that temperature with the regular voting public. The people who don't really follow the politics is probably down because are observing the country is running okay, cotton ok wages, are going up the international stuff. It seems to be totally under control. You don't even here prices, anymore, they're, not even a story I used.

Does not even in the story anymore. That's the that's about as successful as you can get militarily. North Korea. You know it's a little bit of a You know up and down there, but clearly moving in the right direction. So I think the public Is ignoring the news for the most part and that their temperature actually is down, because reality is violating what they imagined was going to happen under a Trump administration people are not being rounded up. Academy is fine, no nuclear wars. In fact, all the opposite is opposite of what they predicted But the television, news media there This model requires them to. You know, crank things up to def Con Twenty, so that you're you're in a continuous fight or flight mode. So the people who watch the television, the most the people

who follow the news. The most are probably at their highest rate of insanity, but I don't think that describes the general population. Is clearly by now noticing that their life is going pretty well And then they have more things to worry about than the news, so that's mine, my purse. My prediction is that the press will get increasingly crazy at the same time that the general public we'll get more more calm because

they're, they're learning to tune out the crazy press. One way that you could measure that is in six months check with the popularity of president Trump if his popularity continues to inch up even just a little bit one percent two percent, if the president is two percent more popular six months from now. What are you going? To conclude, I think you have to conclude that the temperature came down, even as the press is painting a picture of the temperature going up. They need the temperature to go up for for their business model to make money. Florida has five minutes to give the count to the courts. What do you think is going to happen? Do you think Brenda Snipes will be take it out? My handcuffs.

Is that possible 'cause? I feel like it's heading in that direction. I feel like, like Brenda Snipes will actually be removed in handcuffs yeah. I'm not I'm not going to make that a prediction, but isn't it sort of? in that direction it feels like it is now that would be problematic in terms of the way it looks, so the look of it would be terrible. Well, maybe

reason to do it, I'm not entirely sure who the whose side the sheriff is also the same as the sheriff the sheriff is on her side. Well, if that's the case, then, is that the local authorities it's the state, it's only the state who has authority right. Is it possible that the FBI and the feds could get involved in in the in a county? Is election results under the theory that the impact crosses the boundaries? Is there any theory that makes it a federal offense feels like they can make it federal? Well, that's pretty radical for you radical what to remove somebody who's a criminal. If, if it's shown, if it's shown that she is defying the court and it's actually holding up the country

I think it does feel like the issue should be removed in handcuffs. Doesn't that feel like the appropriate response to something that if it's shown- and you know I'm still on the side of were in fog of war, letter letter be innocent until proven guilty. Alright, so my My view on Brenda Snipes is innocent until proven guilty. I know you hate that, but let's, let's keep a standard here. Alright, no matter who it is innocent till proven guilty. I see the same stuff. You see so I think that the odds of her being guilty or very high, but let's keep her innocent until proven guilty all right um. It was a federal election, but I don't know how the laws work in terms of authority over the voting machines and the voting count. That might be separate from the fact that it was a federal

Voting is a civil rights issue. Is that good enough? That might be good enough. I don't know Oh yeah, the big story in the Wall Street Journal about Trump's pay offs. Two women talked about this last night, but I'll just reiterate. So it's being it's being called news that Trump knew about the payments to the women to keep them quiet. Is there anybody in the entire world. Who thought he didn't know about it. It's not really news. If percent of the world knew it before it was in the news that would be the that would be an example of not news. In fact, if I were to define what not news beans,

it would be something that everybody knew for a year. That's like the definition of not news. So it's not really news. If the reporting that the president knew about it and if the issue is hey, He lied about something in his personal life. I say If you can't lie about that, what the hell can you lie about lying just to make this problem go away, is exactly what I would want him to do for the benefit of the country. I would want the president to totally lie about irrelevant to the country irrelevant to the country if he needs to lie about that, just to make it go away, so we can get on with the business of work, I'm all in I'm one hundred percent supportive of lying about stuff that doesn't matter in your personal life completely on board. With that now somebody is going to say,

hey: does the do the ends justify the means to which I say yeah a lot, because the ends were a minor lie about a personal, the whole situation totally trivial to the country, but he is the the you know the head of the country, and so we want to be effective in his job, so which one is more important. Being an effective leader of the United States or telling the truth something in your personal life that doesn't matter to one freaking person on the whole planet- do the ends justify the means Yes, unless you're an idiot unless you're absolute moron. The cost of the benefits can be compared the cost. Is he lied about

something trivial that we don't care about, that we wish we had gotten away with a lie, because we don't want to talk about it. 'cause we don't care what happened to his personal life. We didn't hire him for that. We did not hire him to be our role model right, bear to possibly destroying the United States in the entire world because, as you know, because he's become less you, let's say less effective because he has to deal with this is, These are not even close to being as important, so I support the lie. Assuming it was a lie about his personal life and if he does it again, I support that too. In fact, I support every lie. The president tells and every other politician by the way I just just so you know I'm

inconsistent, because this is the point where people jump in and say: oh you apologists. You will say anything to back the president in my defense the same argument I said about Bill Clinton when Bill Clinton was being taken down from this Monica Lewinsky stuff. I said Loudly and often I didn't have as much of a platform then or to anyone who would listen. I said it's none of our business. Let him get away with a lie: lent LEN just get back to his personal life, not our problem. So I think the standard that I applied to Bill Clinton, which is his personal life, is not my problem and not my concern. And if he wants to lie about it, just to make it go away, I'm all in I was all in Window Clinton. Did it I'm all in when President Trump did it? Assuming that's what happened so that story

it. If those are the stories in the news, things are going really well think about the biggest complaints about the present. Just just put these in context here in her the biggest complaints about, president, he said something that, in the insulted, the President of France, so We care when they still had a good meeting with them and the crown is, you know friendly enough with the president. That's not really a problem, so so that's sort of a a no big deal. France yeah nothing's really happening there that matters. Secondly, the news that he insults black women. Well, that's just fake news because he insults every and the Good NEWS is it turns out that there are a lot of black women, have excellent jobs at high levels, so there you know there on the radar. Now, that's all good NEWS, um, then

let's see what else is in the news then? the other news, oh, that he got rid of Jeff sessions, which nobody on the right one and one and just sessions to remain and nobody on the left, one and Jeff sessions to remain that's the worst criticism about the president, Z fired somebody that nobody wanted. That's it. He fire somebody that everybody wanted gone now. Of course, the concern about Jeff sessions from the Anti Choppers is that the next thing he'll do is Fire Muller, but here's the thing he had fired Muller, it's not really news,

Somebody might do something you don't like, because people might do lots of things. You don't like. That's not news, that's mind, reading right now, if you were to do this well, then it becomes news, but at the moment it's not news, it's nothing, but imaginary news. It's imagining that something will happen now. Let's say he uses wrecker or whoever uses to replace Whitaker and by the way the president has signaled very clearly the Whitaker's not going to stay around. I don't know if you saw that, but the president's acting like he's never met him and doesn't know him that well he's just a temporary filling and the fact rod, Rosenstein, actually, praise Whitaker also makes it feel like. Maybe he sees it as short term thing and he's just trying to get past it. So I don't think we

worry about, would Whitaker keeping the job it's feeling like? That's not likely, but It was suppose somebody like Whitaker starts putting a lid. Pressure on Miller just to wrap things up, the same time that Muller has signaled that he wants to wrap things up. So what if Muller is wrapping things up and mother thinks it will take three months: Do it, but he's in the wrap up phase and let's say Somebody pushes them to get it done in a month and a half. That's the problem. What is a manager do with every project? No matter? What Here in no matter what industry rim there's a check going on and you're the boss? What is every boss, do with every project. They say what do you mean it'll take three months. I need that done. Month and a half wrap it up.

Right so managing somebody's budget and their timelines, israeli just business as usual. So, given that Muller's almost done- and I think everybody is he's almost done now. If it were the beginning of the process, that would be a big problem. But at this point is there anybody left to talk to probably not just the president and they're not going to talk to him. So there's not much left to say so think about those are the biggest stories, the biggest story.

And uh, and then there was the protest, so the protest is because people think that that molar has the goods Une trump another words. The protests were over Russia Collusion, which, as far as we can tell if we're just looking at facts, doesn't exist. So the worst complaints about the President right now are the made up complaints about targeting black women for criticism, which we can observe it doesn't require any research. You could just turn on news and see him insulting everybody. So that's easily disproven, there's the russian stuff, which is literally imaginary. Now I'm not saying that Muller has found nothing, because we need to wait and see, but at the moment nothing is nothing is even slightly telling us nothing even leaning in that direction, at all

so it's sort of an imaginary mind, reading problem. So if your problems have been reduced from think about the problems when Trump took over, the economy wasn't going. Well, that's a big problem. Jobs aren't good enough. That's a big problem. Things were going well, but they were good enough. These are these are big things. Isis is still a big problem. North Korea is still a big problem. Trade bill still a big problem. How many of those things are still big problems. Not a lot. So all all CNN has left, are things which are imaginary, literally imaginary, like imagining that he's making fun of people use targeting people, but clearly that's not the case. You know the facts demonstrate that as clearly as anything could be demonstrated, and

so you've got you've got imaginary racism in terms of targeting black women? You've got imaginary Russia collusion you've got imaginary he's going to Fire Muller, which he might but at this moment we're just imagining it. So if all of your problems are imaginary, a sort of as good as you can get alright, I think I've beaten that point into the ground and I'm going to hang up now and hope everybody does well in this California. Fire I've got some people. I need to check on, and I will talk to you later.