« Coffee With Scott Adams

Episode 329 Scott Adams: Modern Presidential Tweets, Mueller Porn Updates

2018-12-08 | 🔗

Topics: 

  • Don Jr. shared a meme mocking AOC
    • Visual, slightly inappropriate, emotional impact
    • AOC sarcastic reply was so provocative it can’t be ignored
  • Rex Tillerson recently dumped on President Trump
    • President Trump counter-punched Tillerson with a Tweet
  • Nobody does persuasion-contrast as good as President Trump
  • Only losers judge people by whether they’ve made a mistake
    • How a person deals with the mistake is the key
  • Kevin Hart’s ancient humor Tweets about LGBTQ community
  • Are the Democrats pushing the black community from the party?
    • Party support: women, immigration and LGBTQ
  • Mueller’s release of new info…something for everyone
    • Wouldn’t we know if Mueller has found anything juicy?
  • Russian troll farm created anti-Hillary election ads
    • Russian troll farm ALSO created anti-Trump ads
    • If intent was ONLY to sabotage Hillary…
    • …why did they also create anti-Trump ads?

I fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer this method over accepting advertisements or working for a “boss” somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I’m trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that.

See all of my Periscope videos here.

Find my WhenHub Interface app here.

The post Episode 329 Scott Adams: Modern Presidential Tweets, Mueller Porn Updates appeared first on Dilbert Blog.

This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
but a bump bump bump bump album everybody it's time for coffee was got arabs that's me and pretty soon it will be you fellow blake hello eve on forest stephan good to see you all i will be every beverage d have you beverage where's joanne joanne usually quick on the buttons here edmund a re grab coffee grab your stein your copier mug your chalice fill it with your favorite beverage and join me for the simultaneous sip it comes now
ah sir today will be the tale of three tweets the first weight will be the dun don junior tweet about eating dogs second it will be elsie s reply to don junior and then we'll talk about president trumps tweet about rex tellers and we get the three three good tweets here so i gonna move monitor with it so i can read to you from my other monitor save up big hand let's do this i gave a spur so dont junior here he shared a meal in which he mocked elsie
alexandria accuser cartels saying that well let me just look at the actual twitched so the the meme asked why are you afraid of a socialist economy followed by the answer because american want to walk their dogs not eat them apparently that's reference to venezuela so venezuela is doing so poorly with socialism people are literally eating dogs so the first thing that the first thing we should look at is how good was you dont junior tweet i would say a plus and by the way i don't want to ruin it for you but all the other tweets i'm going to talk about today are all able us into getting your attention being a little more provocative than you think someone oughta be
and being visual so those things you look for look for something that's out of the acceptable box but not so far out somebody goes to jail nobody gets hurt just a little bit in appropriate which is what makes it so interesting is why we talk about it now a dog is very visual eating a dog is superficial the dawn junior mainly shared was really you well weapon ized because it calls out reference to venezuela makes you talk about it so you're thinking venezuela as as the model of socialism your imagine eating your dog most of us are probably dog lovers so for me
emotional just construction quality the meme was excellent right so you after like the message but in terms of the quality of it it had all the notes it was provocative it was visual goes to promotion centres it brings in venezuela well now here's the fund port alexandria decides to respond and look at her response which i've just lost almost second she tweeted i i wouldn't reading a new story that doesnt show the tweet they just talk about it
so excel alexandria says speaking that's done juniors tweet she says i have noticed in her tweet she says i have noted the junior her junior here has a habit of posting nonsense about me whenever the mother investigation heats up please keep becoming junior is definitely a coat very very large brain idea the troll amount of a body that will have subpoena power and month have fun so here she goes the very very large brain quote which is again visual arts she's referring to i believe it was the president who said that the that the chinese negotiators over their trade agreements had had said that he is a very very large brain and people laughed because it's that such a classic thing for president trump to say
and associates using that against them too to market you may know you have noted that the the democrats generally use sarcasm to replace reasons have you noticed i'm sure that happens on both sides but the seams is more prevalent i could be biased about this but it seems more prevalent instead of giving reasons for things there were treated so the reasons are obvious and all have to add a sarcasm soon she says it's definitely a very very large brain idea the troll a number of basic issues using sarcasm now sarcasm works really well with her base they love sarcasm it's like the bread and butter so that basket and she also follows lead
junior bottle and the president trump model which is why she so dangerous of saying something that's so provocative you cannot ignore it who are we talking about her who who else knows how to do something like this president job so she's using a very strong messaging strategy does things that are a little farther outside the box than the need to be especially the part where she says that is a bad idea to troll a member of a body meaning the house though will have support power in a month so of course socratic said wait a minute are you threatening somebody over a tweet are you threatening me some outta jail over a tweet and she's exactly saying that but she's kind indicating that the noise the very people who are going to decide whether you get subpoenaed might be a bad idea
so as i heard tweet is very powerful for her base its all the right notes its provocative it's a little seems a little crazy but not to grace than she had to follow up because level people complained second to he said read this by the way i'm always here for the first time for the job crying that this is a quota threat i dont have power sabena anybody congress as a body geo be included has the power although this case to appeal will be the minority voters there power no individual member can issue a subpoena unless era chair which as refreshment i can assure you will not be off it must be under purview sought an almost lemmings so that one i would say that follow tweet was weak but her first one was good because i got her attention
got us talking she made us think about the mauler investigation which is good for her she made us think about the president's statement that he has a very very big brain she turned it into sarcasm which her team likes pretty good and we're talking about that's a win now you may not be aware that rex tellers and who was fired a secretary of state after our many months he did it recently gave a public interview in which said that one of the reasons he couldn't work with president trump is that the president had a different moral moral fibre i guess and that you could ask them to do something illegal he didn't mention but that was but the the contacts here is that tillers was dumping on the president in a pretty brutal away
that's that is a really brutal thing to say about your president that he had no moral fibre that tellers unwontedly words do illegal things without any specific so tromp of being the counter buncher he is sentenced wheat which i believe you ve seen by now he said talking about his current secretary of state he goes by pontio is doing a great job i am very proud of him so here is he's creating contrast so the contrast is i'm not i don't insult everyone might pompeo a great job so that's that's a good start then he goes his predecessor rex tourism didn't of the mental capacity needed he was dumb as iraq i couldn't get rid of him fast enough was lazy as hell
now it is a whole new ballgame gray spirit estate so here again we see him crossing the line from plight behaviour into something that you cannot look away from you can't read this tweet and this is just go on with your day you have to stop what you're doing and really focus on this one because it's is provocative in the way he likes to do it he takes it further than anybody supposed to take it but that's why you're looking at it so just like alexandria he takes it to the next level where nobody gets killed nobody gets hurt nobody loses money but makes your brain on fire so less was so good to look for the look for the visual part of this he's a talk about sellers and president said dogmas iraq and also lazy is hell i was
myself imagine rex tellers and in your head oh mental picture of a rex tellers and does rex dealers and look like a coffee cup narrowly does rex tillers and look like a squirrel now now there's nothing about him the looks like a squirrel does rex tellers and look like an automobile no he doesn't does rex tellers remind you of a rock a little bit he's got he's got sort of the same shape yos guess or a blockhead he's got that certain grayish colouring like a rock you actually see iraq so once again the president has picked a visual visual comparison
that when you look at them you just think they i it sort of soda rock like and then i went back and of course i had to watch what tellers and said after i'd read this tweak led into sport that in you watch tillers and talk in this interview because he's other a texas he has he has the job bush problem which is that prior to you telling me that job bush was low energy i just thought it was a qualified executive whose com and pool the moment you say low energy that's all i can say forever with rex tellers and before are you told me he was lazy as hell according to the present i would have said well he's in a successful executive from exxon you don't get that job without being worker a real go get her but the more
what the president said he was lazy is hell and i looked at rex too i am talking in the interview i felt i saw saying he's too in kind too slowly you sort of low energy i can i can come to see the lazy thing that doesn't mean he's lazy it would be surprising to me if somebody who had his resume rex tillerson you know it was actually lazy but as a tweet and a and a a punch back this is a counter bunch is really powerful the the lazy box of rocks comment while you dumb as rock comment is great and then i've told you before that one of the persuasion things that president does i think better them i've ever seen it done so the specific persuasion technique i doubt you ever see a done better than this and that is contrast so
doesn't just tell you that tellers and has done because if the tweet said nothing but this calls everybody diamond lazy and would say to yourself there is a president who just as everybody dumb and lazy and it would feel like he was just just insulting people they d like but because he started it was my computer is doing a great job on very proud of him he's created this enormous contrast between doing a good job that he likes and being on his bedside is the biggest dressed you'll ever see and the industry the size of the contrast the ads the persuasion if you just talked about one of them without the other you'd miss all the contrast so he consistently knows how to build into his persuasion max mom contrast visual persuasion and
things are a little bit farther than you think he should but again just like alexandria tweet just like don juniors tweet he didn't take it so far today but it s hard we can look away i should also mention i forgot to mention this alexandria is tweet she referred to don junior as just junior which is a pretty clever dismissive because just call him junior makes them sound like a child or something so that's actually pretty good persuasion so there you have three out of four tweets there were really well done one was done juniors original tweet about socialism making you eat dogs try to forget that one right try to get that into your head your head you can't
if you start thinking about eating dogs equal socialism that is a powerful persuasion so dont you guess enable us then alexandria octavia cortez replied with a very clever rip i give her any plus on that her response to the first we was was gonna weak and then the president's tweet is an absolute a plus kisses his base laughs at it but it also rings true doesn't it the thing about i'll talk about kevin her remind me again if i forget so it rings true because in the in the tiller sin regime doesn't feel like we got a lot done does it but as soon as much
like pompey always on board it fell like trade negotiations we're going our way in north korea was acting well it does feel like tat some didn't do the job the patio did now from our point of view we can know that that's true we don't really know who did word we don't know they always there at the right time and things are going well for for tellers and these data around you don't know that but the way it looks the president has a good point as it looks now the critics of the president are piling on to be on twitter and they're using their most powerful weapon against me sarcasm as right the sarcasm trolls of attack me for my tweets saying that i will talk about the presidency and they said some version of this and i have deal with me today still have to do my best without him
some version of all scott you say that the press so good a hiring people if he's oh good hiring people why did they hire somebody like rex tellers and whose dumb as rock and his lazy how could he be a good hire he hired such a bad person which he now admits how can you explain ascot how can you possibly explain that to which i say the smartest people i know will tell you the hiring is mostly guessing the skill does the firing if you can fire people being good hiring isn't going to be good enough because the body makes mistakes hiring there's no exception to that there is no such thing is a leader who hires only good people thus not a thing
if you are if you were to tell me that rex tourism being that the head of exxon one of the biggest companies in the world having international connections having managed massive organisations if you would told me that he was available to be secretary of state i'm pretty sure i would have hired him if he didn't rule during his interview the first time i talked to him that's that's a serious resonate right on paper rex tillers and should have been pretty great that job and i was actually expect me he would be now you didn't work out we'll never know exactly what the reasons are but it didn't work out you didn't work with the president well or you just didn't work well you know nobody will ever know those details but the president did get rid of it in a fairly timely manner in other words long enough to work that he can have a good
good opinion them whether he would be good to keep and then when it was time to to fire him he pulled the trigger so might take on this situation is you saw excellent leadership hiring him was probably a good decision given how good he looked on paper and here's the important part given the number of people who would not be willing to work with the present remember when the president first took office most of the most qualified republicans didn't have anything to do with it any sort i had to pick a republican right so the pool of people you could pick from was very small and it was not crazy to think the somebody with a business background especially one that powerful good set with with the president that was pretty reasonable thing to assume now assuming things based on good reasons
and being wrong is not stupid it's how you deal with being wrong there is a difference between weather smart or dumb this is one of the most important things they ll ever you'll ever here as a tip if judge people by whether they made a mistake here loser i'll say that again if you judge people by whether they made a mistake you are a loser you should judge them by how they deal with the mistake because you're making mistakes do if you ve never made one you probably well if you're the only person has never made a mistake your time ok how people deal with their mistake tell you a lot the fact that someone makes a mistake actually don't tell me that much because as a universal quality we all make mistakes will have blind spots
i would say this is an example of the president's doing the best you can do under the sun cohesion that was presented to him very few people to pick from very little time because he had a higher lot of people who are you really busy in the beginning he picked somebody there was terrific on paper and then after a was clear it wasn't working out he got rid of it's bad as good as you can do you like to say well why didn't he hire a good person in the first place and the reason is nobody can do that nobody the pickle everything is the smartest person i've ever known the say yeah warren buffett illicit warren buffett has warren buffett ever had to irish anybody i don't know but i'm guessing yes don't you think warren buffett as fired people does it make warren buffett bad business
about you on musk or bill gates mark zuckerberg they ever had to fire anybody of course of they read the fight people that they thought would work out but didn't of course does that make them bad hiring no no it makes them but an ordinary meaning in other not do anything wrong it makes him leaders there people will make mistakes than they have to fix it that's the job right kevin heart governor was packed to host the the oscars and then people poor through his tweets and found some what has been called anti elegy bt q stuff in their not not to reason but recent enough there was a problem and he decided that rather than doing ill
the normal kind of ice i'm sorry apology i did everything wrong i've changed please forgive me i'm so sorry about the people i heard he can't win at it's more like a professional comedian witches he wasn't gonna back off from the fact that he was joking now i looked at the air the tweet i think the tweeted had to do with the fact that if he saw his son plain the doll house he would he would break that dollhouse because he wouldn't wouldn't be happy that his son was beyond potentially gay and so peoples that's it that's a speech i would have to say that their right if you're going to say if there's any such thing as hate speech
it probably looks a lot like that you could argue oh he was just joking and an i'm i'm sensitive to that argument because sometimes people are just joking and i think that by been some explanation where the real joke was about his own intolerance joke wasn't about his son the joke wasn't about gay people or the were the value of gay people i believe is what he was talking about is how he was not in revolve father not good enough and in our world today you know i follow the argument hear what he sang i i understand the concept of how you could say yet that that itself deprecating i understand the argument you i'm a professional humorist and so i get that may be in his mind it wasn't as bad as it was the way i came across but
the way you handled it was not the way the public want to handle and so they decided to put pressure on him and he pulled out and he got amateur though these the situation itself is a little bit interesting you know i think i'm gonna i'm gonna back the beauty q critics the people who are prohibited you and i are criticising heart i think i will take their side than this one because what he did say was very it was offensive and he had chance he had a chance they gave him a chance to explain himself and he chose not to take the path i think i do those conditions the algae beauty keep people em
abc had every right to do with it but here's the interesting part taking taking a level higher the it seems to me that increasingly the democratic party is throwing the black community under the bus in favour of women and algae beating you know what i'm talking about this i'm not talking about facts and i'm not talking about all the context that would give you a clearer picture this i'm talking about the way it feels and the way it feels is more predictive then what the facts are because people act on their feelings if you were if you're a real say a black man in the united states and you're just paying attention
the news you not doing the deep dive because most people are not right most people just sort of skin the or they're vaguely where the news so i say you're just typical american you're watching the headlines like everybody else you're seeing president trump working with a bipartisan group a black leaders on prison reform and being apparently all in and you saying that steam is the one who was driving at the jared so there's no doubt no doubt if you watching us no no ambiguity whatsoever that the president is doing something that is unambiguously good for
african american world you are also looking at your employment rates looking great and you're looking at you're looking at some pardons of african american people were wrongly accused you're looking at i see looking things and then you watching the democratic party which is your home right your political home if you if you're an african american yet a few african american in this in this country most likely you think the democratic parties wrong and then you see kirsten jeweller brands tweet it says that the future is women the future as well no that actually is probably true right i'm not gonna
besides whether that a true or false statement because it's true enough i would say that as a valid statement but how does it feel how's it feel when i say the futures women i the way i interpret that based on july brands quote is that the hours the female sensibility will dominate but i think that's probably drew you it will increase in importance in the future and i would observe that there has been true and i think it will be continued to be true but house i feel if you're a black man and you're watching your parties say the future is women and then you watching the the party oh hard at kevin heart
do you think kevin heart is a republican probably not i don't know i have no idea what is political feelings are but just based on the fact in the entertainment industry and he's a black man probably he leaves democrat but now you watching the old elegy beauty q community go after him in my opinion they have a good point but the way it feels is that young black men are being sort of pushed out of the party and the republicans offering something something let the democrats weren't offering wishes respect and getting some things done
not saying respect or getting things done if you're a black man in an up and then look at immigration who who benefits job lies when you tighten up immigration here's one of the biggest the biggest little secrets among the democratic party there are a lot of democrats who dont like immigration and even democrats can say it out loud and i'm pretty sure that if you were a black american and especially if you're in the the income group there would be most computer the jobs for immigrants that you're not too big on emigrants you're probably plenty friendly in terms of the people were already here but the question of how many you let in
might be a little more republican then you're living on because people do pursue their self interest and this is clearly self interest and that there is something else about republicans championing immigration control and that is that rich people kind of benefit by immigration if you look at my life at like i was my personal rich white guy life how has it been influenced by immigration probably improved because there's cheap labour there's people to do stuff that i need you not if you comparative let me give you an example i grew up in upstate new york there close to zero undocumented immigrants
right so i grew up where there are basically no immigrants and that would be true today so i keep in touch with family etc back there if you wanted somebody to do a small task for you in my town and abstained new york you're dire somebody just do the same fix something on your hauser dig a hole or some like that you can't find anybody can higher anybody a whole range of physical labour where i grew up because there are no undocumented immigrants they and all this massive amounts of labour that you just can't get unless they're so when you watch republicans were anybody whose supporting them when you think republicans you think of a rich white guys the sort of automatic association
but their acting against their own self interest in many cases so acting against their own comfort and even financial self interest in limiting the amount of low cost labour in the country so so he says bs not a good it's not really an argument this is an argument i'll tell you that the way people feel is based on what we are seeing in their experiencing and how they feel is not an argument so it should feel if you are a black citizen of the united states is probably feeling forget about the facts it's probably feeling like the republicans or making a good faith genuine effort to make your life better and
the public and in the end the democrats a kind of more of a party for women their self branding as a party for women there talking about the future in terms of women so it might be a little less welcoming secrecy surprised i you're ethic doubts about whether or not you can find some way to dig a hole you are not really convincing anecdotal evidence is not convincing when i use my example of not being able to find labour in my
home town it's it's to describe the story you know that one example should not be persuasive it's just how to tell the story with a with an example how's the altitude sickness or better yet who do for some reason i never knew there was a thing called altitude sickness until i came were amory now i'm in utah that eight thousand feet the first two days here were pretty bad you jesse he can't breathe headache e u you lose your appetite you can you can sleep it's is superior and i think it happens through at least half of the people cover when i got here everybody was we water and saying drink water tank lots of water
but they didn't say why they said that that you'd get dehydrated up here and so i thought that's why you drink water you drink water because your dehydrated they didn't play the drinking water is your primary defense against altitude sickness that was never mentioned i got a feeling that the people working in the resort and vacation industry up here more focus on your thirst than the fact that is preventing you from getting you know an actual illness that feels like the flu is there a difference if you drive him versus flying i think so anecdotally people hear talk about people getting off the plane they came from lower altitude and there is
thirdly a higher altitude and one of the ways that you can adjust is by staying a thousand feet lower for a day to kind of a just and then you go up the next thousand feet so my guess is that driving is better but i dont have signs for that how do you do in denver danvers mile high so that would be a little over one third there's something magical about a thousand feet when you reach a thousand feet that's when altitude sickness seems to kick in so here at five thousand feet you're not gonna get a lot of altitude sickness
seven thousand you're not gonna get a lot but there's something about a thousand at least people are telling me that that the sort of magic cut off for when it becomes problematic does we'd make it better well i can say for sure but you sound very cobb obviously you comments christina had less problem with it but she had a little problem breathing if you go to the gym here there's a german they resort if you go to the janitor everybody's just second wind let's talk about mahler and all the new mulder poor news forgets talk about that you can see so clearly in all
the mahler revelations thee the two movies effect i was pretty sure that whatever new information dropped out cohen men for anything else about mahler i was pretty sure the read it and i would say so what ill doesn't involve the present etc and i was pretty sure that the anti jumpers would read it and say ha ha ha others to me that got him now this time we gotcha and of course this will happen so it looks like all of the news about the big news and the clues to me that i feel like their leaning toward tromp being in the clear
now he tweeted apparently without any context he tweeted that he had been completely vindicated her or shown to be in the clear signal and i assume he was talking about the new information coming up the miller stuff and one of them that that is hard to interpret so all rely on georgia what's to do that the legal interpretation if if cohen had given them something on the president there was really actionable something that would really take down the president would mahler give him recommend a long sentence because the recommendations or that he go to jail for a significant amount of time it seems to me that if
had been useful in terms of implicating somebody above him that he would be up for very little jail time seems to me flynn was the opposition because he was very cooperative but we haven't seen anything command of that and my guess is given that what flynn was accused of which was really just not being fourth coming about some rush has he talked to if that's all he knew anything else except his own situation it makes that he would fully cooperate and then when he was done there wouldn't be anything about the present there was there was a problem so the flint thing make complete sense in my movie where the president is not complicated by anything they fled and sang her door and then
current situation cohen really does no unlike flynn flynn we could imagine doesn't know what everybody else is doing to know what the president did or did not the current was on the inside of the stormy daniel stuff who the other woman was pictures he was on the inside with whatever our relations and with russia about russian deal so you would expect that if anybody had the goods it would become an because how it is built is burned all of his bridges with anybody who was associated with the president or likes the president those bridges are burned the only thing that can do that would be good for common and his family is to cooperate no jail time but yet he did not cooperate enough and did not get and did not get off soberly you'll get gelatin
that tells me you didn't have anything to offer and that all of his problems were self self generated another worthy wealth is also pointing out that the initial interviewers of flynn said he didn't lie so there were their lots of extenuating circumstances around the flynn situation but if one situation was trivial current situation seems to be all about cowan it doesn't seem to be about the present but that said there's enough you know russia related things in the sentences that people use when they talk about it that everybody who hates the president is going to assume assume that he did something we just haven't found it yet so those who say that the president is in trouble
dont have any evidence for that hypothesis now or do i have evidence that he's not in but it would be very unusual if you're just tried to handicap the odds here the odds that we wouldn't already know something that would get the present trouble feels very low doesn't it does look at all this we do know put together all the things we know that did happen and how heather not really terribly problem for the president in terms of him being removed from office you're going to jail or anything like that none of them really seem important and we know a lot of them leaky world what are the odds that we would not even heard of our rumour of something that could take down the president nothing not a suspicion well their suspicions without evidence but there's nothing this
evidence the somebody would say well if that's true nothin like that the other roger stone thing is a fun element the story and as i said before what makes the fund is that he's famous for not telling the truth so would it really matter were roger stone dead or did not say about what he did or did not do in same with courses other their literally famous ravine unreliable so
are you gonna builder can you build a case based on the other the the the blessing of two people were known to be unreliable there's not much of a case there ah here was it there who said the walls are closing and was at brain so listen to that language the walls are closing and do you not the phrase the walls are closing in leaves out was missing what's missing is anything like a reason or a fact now of course the the reason or the context is you go earn flynn and all these people are talking in that might be reaching the end of what are you doing we like to think every week but doesn't happen
but where are the reasons and can anybody explained to me i think i'll just maybe ask this question once every week or two until somebody offers even even a stab at the answer if the russians were trying to help trump as mr just model with our process and make it less credible runner if the real reason was to help trump why did they make as they were anti hilary was it some of the employees got the message wrong how do you explain that was it they help cover their bases in case they got caught doesnt really feel like a good plan was it so soliciting s i think that's yes do covering their bases
and if they were serious about it why were though the means so weak and so poorly done that imagine any major developed country could be behind it it look like some rogue guy may be trying to help to help put out maybe get a little a little gsm brownie point was born it looks like somebody just a day will do some maybe putin did or did not say go ahead but that's pretty weak and haven't we heard people question at this point that i haven't we seen some questions whether we can really know the intentions of russia
to compare these two hypotheses one hypothesis is russia thought the clinton would be a disaster not just for russia but maybe four for the world right cause if russia gets into it with the united states is not a good situation so it may what's the difference between saying that russia was pro trump versus saying that were anti hilary how do you make that this distinction isn't it possible that the that russia was more likely and anyone but clinton cap you how do you think that just didn't work clinton to win now they may have said well let's just the screw with the system but he also they have to think that russia thought this
everything that we thought which is as she was deafening gonna win now do you think the russian slaughter tromp was gonna win it doesn't feel like it because nobody else dead except a few pundits like me why isn't someone put together a report on all the russian adds used well i've seen from facebook they did release the ads or on facebook and you can look at i've i think it's a full list of it as and they are so weak and poorly done and as i said there all sides of clinton and drop that is hard to imagine what the purpose was it is if i had to look at evidence hour limit lemme give you a conspiracy theory
it would be that because i don't have any evidence of it so well say as no evidence but i'm just gonna give you an explanation for those russian campaign for twenty sixteen that's different from the one you ve heard the one they heard is that the russian government for some reason did a terrible amateur job there was easy to detect and for some reason criticised both sides maybe but it would be unusual let's compare that to another theory somebody paid this russian company somebody who wasn't russia could about
you could have been a billionaire in this country does somebody paid this little russian troll farm i had to make ads and the russian troll form because the russians and they know that they can take this billionaires money and then a really have to produce much him of effectiveness said oh yeah we can make you some great names give us three million dollars i will make you some campaign names of well these really be worth the money then the unknown buyer gives them money
they do terrible adds because they don't know how to do it well but they said they did and then the next thing you know putin is getting blamed which is more likely that russia is so bad that making means and the other their best people can't make a meme is our possible or is it possible that a russian company screwed a customer let me just ask that of those two things which is more likely a russian companies rude a customer or their working with burden to do a really bad job and and they didn't even have all there its pointing in the same direction now imagine they had to customers want
one of them to create adds that were anti trump that customer paid a lot and got a lot of adds a second customer comes along and says hey can you make me some anti hilary some anti anti trumpets so one customers as giving pro trump adds another says gimme some antitrust beds second one has less money less guess fewer ads so when the fbi and the cia and everybody who is looking at it they see who ninety percent of these are our pro trump so that must be putin's intention another leap because remember this was a commercial troll farm that i imagine it would take money from anybody wants to pay them so if any outside sources said gimme some trump adds gimme some hilary adds that would completely explain everything we ve seen
i'm not saying that's what happened offering evidence that happened under saying that if you compare that explanation which is completely ordinary and explains every fact right the fact that they just had customers who bought names and they didn't care what that means were for explains every fact that we can see that doesn't mean it's true but the the official story doesn't explained the facts doesnt explain whether so bad doesn't explain why there is so easy to catch it doesn't why they had adds targeting both sides just doesn't explain it
somebody says russian until ism commercial the troll farm wasn't part of the entire community was a commercial separate thing owned by a billion per year which is one of the companies he owned now it's probably true that they did work for the russian government if the russian government was willing to pay on more they had some favours to curry but it wasn't officially apart there until their intentions were to be divisive
maybe maybe so if their intention was to be divisive that too would be more likely in terms of explaining all the facts then than the official version so i would say that two explanations that given the facts in evidence or more likely than the official one
oh that's see ya why is there no academy award category for periscopes where are the emmys for periscopes good question i'm seeing lots of questions about navarro and all i understand is that use kind of china trade but i don't know anything beyond that it's probably good to throw a hawk in there because that again creates contrast if if we decide to make a deal with china that is some in the reasonable zone it will be helpful there will be helpful to have a hard knows person on the negotiations
thoughts on the yellow jackets well it looks like they did their job of getting that gas tax reversed so i think when it comes right down to its people in the middle class do not want to fund climate change so happens when the people who have to pay for it just reviews
what do i think the proud boys and given again ass well i don't think i know enough about the group but it seems like they're like every other group in which they have some perfectly nice people and some were not that would explain every large groups so that they can say about that is and a lot of the folks that gets the queues of racism are really closer to the free speech category another word
the people who who speak freely and are not worried about what they say in terms of how other people interpret it almost always look like terrible people or where they will be portrayed as terrible by others and with a proud boys there are certainly some of that going on but i'm not gonna defend or criticise them because i don't know enough just make a general statement my opinion on laura rumours ban from twitter the weird thing that laura bloomer being banned from twitter is that she was banned for liberal speak so she is obviously more associated with conservatives but the thing she got banned for was agreed with liberals and idle
i have explained that because what she was saying was gonna wanna get banned from periscope from making the same mistake but source also generally i believe you speaking out against discrimination against she was speaking out against anti semites at about the anti women opinions there she named a specific person as being in that camp and i believe she offered some reasons i dont know enough about the person and i don't want to get banned from twitter for turkey massively i don't know too much about but the message that laura limerick got banned for as i understand it was that there should be less anti semitism and the women should be treated better now the context was sharia
but still was a perfectly liberal message now happens to be a liberal message that conservatives agree with but i think it's the first time correct me if i'm wrong is it the first time anybody's been banned from twitter for being politically correct can you think of an example
because i was obtained politically correct just to make the point where she was saying was fact based witches that sharia young the way as practised in the way some people would preferred practice it could be bad for anybody who is not this logic and it could be bad for women i don't think anybody defends the fact that there are some risk in that but as i know that it was already talked about tellers and
what does a female future look like four men where else could question the value of men s early decreased because women don't mean need men for incomes they don't necessarily need men to protect them young lawyer police forces and stuff like that which our men but they don't need a husbands doing this so i think that the value of men has decreased but interestingly the value of women has decreased as well for reasons so i think the value
men and women have for each other as tremendously decreased and has no no surprise that younger people are not even dating look who owns or of twitter than jack dorsey here so there is a a saudi investor who owns a part of twitter understand but i don't know if that's the reason lord bloomer got banned that that would be a leap ah i think i've said everything i need say for today i will leave it at that and i will talk to you later
Transcript generated on 2020-04-01.