But a bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump. Yes, it's time for what? What is the time for that's right? Cipher coffee was got atoms and you are here to enjoy it. Hello, everybody. O Brien Hallo SAM, Hello array and everybody else whose names are real. Name's allow Michel, Tyler, Marcus, J, P cannon here and it's time we have a thousand people. It's time to reach, you clash your copier mug you're, jealous your stein, you're container of beverages lifted to your lips. I hope is filled with coffee, but it doesn't need to be to enjoy the simultaneous sip. It happens now.

Oh, that's good, simultaneous seven, sir. We ve got a number of stories in the news. Most of them are minor, but because the news has to sell products, they are being treated as major. So the present has new temporary hurry. Whatever that means chief of staff, move. Any initial reports are good the people who seem to know this morning. Guys say he's smart and he's the deal, and he could be good. So has done much to say about that sounds like you may have picked a good person next lose a judge. You who seems to have a judge in Texas seems to have said that Obamacare is unconstitutional, like the whole Obamacare,

I don't know what that means. Yet my first gas is to ignore it. Why? My first instinct is that ok, that's! big, nothing it'll be appeal that will get turnover and appeal. So the Obama CARE story is probably closer to nothing. Then something but war wait and see There is another story on CNN who is always looking for trouble. There are always looking for trouble if its anything about Trump and the latest is that the Trump Hotel in Washington, where I have stayed actually stated the Trump hotel. When I went to Washington less than that Apparently they charged we more than normal for the campaign, so in other words the term

campaign paid the Trump hotel. This is what I see him in his reporting and they're saying that vodka may have been involved in some part of the negotiations for the price and they talk about the price and they say I guess somebody wanted today, eighty five thousand the night, but but the hood tromp was ripe. Hotel was trying to trade to charge a hundred and seventy something a night. So here's was missing from the story. You see anything missing from the story so for a big no regulation party, the Trump campaign wanted to use the Trump Hotel and the price was about double what the campaign wanted to one or two bay and therefore its a scandal.

There is something missing with a story. Yes, there's something missing. Here's was missing it's what every hotel does has summit Some major said: do you know what a hotel charges for their facilities? Here's the exact price that every hotel charges for everything they do and I'll be very precise. This is exactly what every hotel charges for everything they do, whatever they can get, all hotels charge as much as they can get, and that varies based of the season the day the occupancy. Various other a lot of things. Now If your name was the tramp hotel and Europe Occasion was Washington D C. Somebody named Trump just

the presidency. Unexpectedly, what is the market value of space and the Tromp hotel in Washington D C? answer about double the market rate about double right. Because there is no. There was no place in Washington. There would have been cooler more appropriate, more perfect for that event. For that group, where was the second place? They were gonna go well wherever their second place was gone. Probably was busy, probably they're gonna overcharge, and then, if you were there we're not in a trumpet property which would have made it twice a school when I when I visited the president in August. The only reason I wonder to Washington was to visit the president and.

For me, there was not. There is no decision about whether to stay. I did even price and the other hotels, because if you They go visit President Trump, the troll Bardell wrote this is it just makes the whole trip a little bit more complete in some way, so. When I watch CNN cover the story, I watch to see. Ok, somebody's gonna tell them. They're all hotels raise the high as possible for the market conditions, and that is that this particular case was the ultimate market conditions. So was a true that a Trump hotel property and I'm not sure exactly what the ownership is, their hotel. If it's more of a life,

single, whether using the name ruffians it doesnt matter really, but should they have negotiated as hard as possible with the campaign USA Shut, the Trump hotel should negotiate as hard as possible. With the campaign. Do you know why they should do that? Let live without other, if the hope, if the Trump Hotel had not charged as much as they thought they could get. What will we re talking about today such question. What would we be talking about in the news today if the Trump hotel? I give him the campaign, a good price, right. It would have been an illegal campaign contribution the one and only way this was. This was legal, the

only way it was legal as if the Trump or tell tried as hard as possible to screw the Trump campaign, and that's the trouble campaign tried as hard as possible to screw the tramp hotel and according to the story, that's exactly what happened. The Trump campaign negotiated as hard as it could against the Trump Hotel, and they they ended up on the price. I don't what price was, but if you can tell me, tell me with a straight face the that's not the way. It's supposed to work. Tell me how What's the other way it supposed to work? the other way is illegal. We live in a capitalist country. There. We're supposed to screw each other as hard as possible. That's what they tried to do. No story when there's no story there,

I want to read you something! That's funny to me when I read when I read thence homepage on their website I'm not joking about this. I read it for the for the jokes You're when I said the jokes, I mean the things that just strike me as funny when I read sealant clears the top. Left story, meaning the most important story and seen in opinion because they put it on the top and the left. That's where you put the good stuff says trumps worst nightmare as the big headlines and I'm thinkin, my goodness. This is gonna, be some bad stuff whatever's under the headline trumps worst nightmare in the top positions in the news that some bad stuff, let's see what it is says weeks. Devastating revelations, unlike oh, my God, devastating revelations.

These are not normal revelations. These are devastating. Go on, have left the president's political career. Clouded by criminality and his life under a legal microscope way. What that, what does that say clouded by criminality? That means other people's criminality. Do you know who else is life is crowded, is clouded with criminality CNN. You me We're all clouded with criminality is key, I did with criminality means people, you know well or have worked with, have been criminals, while I'm pretty guilty of that. I have known people. I've even had friends, I've read friends were total, Chris

Oh, I didn't know about it and then till they went to jail so clouded with criminality serve you notice, the CNN. They must have a whole department whose only job is to come up with new ways to say that the president is a criminal without actually say he's a criminal. So you want to say things like the evidence indicates, or the evidence implicates the president or he's under a cloud of criminality or there's a swarming turd parade around him here, they're just coming up with more and more clever ways to say He is not doing anything, he hasn't everything himself, but there is the war.

Rules are closing. The walls are closing it that's. What am I to everyone's worse than Watergate, worsen, Watergate compared to Watergate? This would make people tremble it'll, make people travel, and then you actually look at the news, and you say if everything about the Kohen story is exactly the way it's reported. There's no problem, let limit! Let me tell you something going you gotta be mad. You haven't heard on television. If you watching the news, I gotta tell you something That's insanely, obvious. Insanely obvious, but only after I sat and watch others watch others hit you true or false- and I believe everyone on all sides of Trump related things- would acknowledge that the next things I say archer, so

a thing to be any dispute on what I'm going to say. Next, there are very highly qualified lawyers who say that the present in the United States has broken laws and that he is in serious legal jeopardy. Over this current situation, troop we'd all agree. That's true right. There are a number of highly qualified lawyers who say that this presidency has broken laws and that the key One situation is a dangerous legal jeopardy for him. True, everybody else would also agree that there is an other sort of lawyers, more pro trump lawyers who are also highly qualified, highly paid highly accomplished? who say: there's no problem here at all right now, I'm not saying which ones right I'm saying that as an observer is objectively true, that their

highly qualified lawyers on opposite sides, some say he's guilty as hell and in love trouble some say there are literally nothing here right now. Can you remember what is the standard for conviction, is the standard for conviction. Some people say he's guilty and some people say he's not know. That's not the standard. The standard for cars action is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Did I just describe guilty beyond reasonable doubt if I can fill a stadium if I can fill a stadium with high?

qualified lawyers who say in my opinion, there is not even a lawyer. This been violent. Is that guilty beyond reasonable doubt not even close, not even close now. Do you feel angry that nobody put it to you the way I just it. If you take into consideration. The size and the quality and the experience of the lawyers say as no real problem here doesn't matter if they're only ten percent, and there are ninety Son saying the other thing that doesn't matter ten percent, of highly qualified lawyers who are not even involved in the case who say and was it looks to me like its confusing

was ambiguous, is now being applied evenly. There's nothing to see here. That's a hundred percent good enough to guarantee this president's not in trouble legally yes, but legally now, so now that I've said that, how do you feel about the president's legal jeopardy from just the Kohen stuff, we're just limiting it to the council So so sundry saying judging and volatile on Fox NEWS said the president's in trouble I didn't see that, but I saw the headlights does that matter. Does it matter? How many lawyers say he's legal trouble? It doesn't matter. It only matters that there is a substantial number of your legitimate

Well trained lawyers who say looks vague to me. Looks this stage It is not useful. There isn't the slightest chance. The given all of those lawyers who say it's not even illegal that he's gonna get convicted, keep in mind. The lawyers who say it's not even illegal are not saying that he didn't do it everybody's. Looking at exactly the same facts, We're not even arguing the truth of the facts, even people who say: there's no law assume that all the facts, I've been in evidence are the facts right that there was a band. What what? What logical fallacy is stacking the deck with all those lawyers. What I'm saying is that there is no stay.

The deck. As long as there are plenty of lawyers who say we don't even we can't even determined that there's a real quiet crime here you can guarantee that no jury is gonna, be a hundred per cent on one side. If you can't even get the lawyers degree of its own legal costs,. Not the case with anything else right, if you said somebody murdered somebody, could you find a lawyer to argue that murder isn't actually even illegal hell? Think so that was about analogy. The scene and also has an article on here called peaches. One, and one says here how it would work and then, in parentheses, if it actually happened. What what persuasion? technique. You see an amusing when they

when they read an article says impeachment one one hears our work. If it actually happened, that's not news that is persuasion, they're making you think, pass the sale so they're making you think, pass the the impeachment as if we're just accepting that a sort of a routine thing and now we're thinking about the details of it. So that is just persuasion. Now it's not and is not an unreasonable article, but it would be better to say here so impeachment works just as a reminder. That would be a little more objective than to say if it happens, here's how it would work they're they're, taking you mind into the future. What you thinking about a specific president having a specific outcome, they could have made this objective and said:

it's very unlikely. They would be an impeachment because the Senate is never gonna go for it. Anyways was wasted time and is politically unwise. Would you like a refresher about one in impeachment? Is. That would be an objective way said the starvation think a little bit pass the sale, but because his frame differently, you start by saying: there's no way. Gonna happen, buses we're talking about ITALY, here's a refresher courses, what impeachment is and how it works. That would have been fair. This is just persuasion. Ok. Now here's my most fun topic of the day I sent out, I would say, a poorly conceived tweet day before you, in which I was saying that President Tromp was the most pro elegy Bt Q. President. Ever

now? Of course, I knew when I said it that it would be provocative and get people chattering, which is part of the fun. Why use twitter? If he can can be interesting, But I got some push back. I want to talk about the push back because I was pretty good. Now since it such a rarity in this world see anybody incorporate a new information and then revived the European. I thought it would be useful to see me do it in public now I will confess It was under informed on this topic and if you tweet something this under informed, you will get informed very quickly. So I got quite informed, but there is still some big hole. We'll see or maybe someday you can help me fill it in. I am going give you the President Trump Pro argument

then I'll give you the push back. So the pro is that this is Trump as the first president come into office. In favour of gay marriage we now having a problem with this is not so much in favour is just didn't care one way or the other, so on that and that narrow point his views more advanced than every president before him, because even President Obama came in our little antigay marriage, so there's one thing: I will talk well the negatives moments on not ignoring them. We're just gonna get to them second. Secondly, he is the point the first openly gay diplomats to a major country, Embassadors Grenelle to Germany, so that I think you have to give that right. Now, I'm sure there have been plenty of

yeah openly gay people of serbian government. So I'm not sure that's the biggest steel in the world it just it must be. It must be just specific to diplomats, so I wouldn't say that the biggest thing in the world, but the fact that he did it all goes in his column. Now, let's talk about the negatives, so Sears pushed back. I got number one. His vice president is MIKE Pence in my pants could be arguably the most antigay politician that we ve known or egoism

top top ten percent, probably so help it and the president's be pro while his vice president. He back is so anti good point, except was poured in contacts. He hired Trump. I'm sorry Trump brought on pens, not because they agreed on that stuff. He brought him on to win because he needed a certain constituency beyond inside and so pants, for next four to eight years LE say, will save the not the next, but for a period of four or eight years of the Trump presidency. What did Trump due to them aunt voice in America pants, he completely silence them.

Does. The vice president doesn't have the option of having its own opinion on this There is not one that I can say in public so which, which democratic president ever silenced the most antigay Political voice in the country, I have never heard of any democratic president, silencing republican antigay voice, but president dropped it. He took the most antigay guy and completely silence them right Do you remember at the I guess was at the the republican convention? correct me if I'm wrong by believes the president present Tromp candidate Trump, that help obey. Didn't he held up a rainbow flag with. There was pro algae beauty.

And I believe he had a full throated endorsement of me, I'm taking care that community. I said this the other day and- and this next part is completely visible to the entire left, an analysis. The sense since tromp became elected. I have never heard even I can think of one antigay thing coming out of a Republican. It feels as if Trump changed the Republican. General priorities, maybe if not their minds, because he pace, the Republicans for so long that when

he gets an office when Peter TEAL spoke at the GEO P convention. I thought that was important, so it seems to me that tromp has done something that no Democrat has ever done. He he complete leave. It seems again, I'm gonna put the sound to your opinion and, or fact checking what is to me. The trump has changed the GEO, p platform and entire attitude about the gay, lesbian population, in a way that no Democrat ever did and no republican effort. It am I wrong about that. I believe.

That trumps sort of live and let live attitude, especially in here here's the weird part. The weirdest thing about Trump is that his own personal life is, let's say, complicated, and therefore he takes a republic in group that was Reggie about personal stuff right, wouldn't you say the the GNP has traditionally been pretty judgmental about what you did in your personal life, and am I correct that that's gone Well, it wasn't that long ago, everybody, Was saying, hey get the GEO piano my bedroom, it's not even an issue anymore. It feels to me the trumpets completely taken the the antigay, at least on the surface of the g opium, just made to go away.

I heard no antigay stuff from any GEO papers period now, but I'm not done because, as I said, the Mai, my critics on this point. We're not without their good points. Here is an excellent somebody said that trumpet, has nominated more antigay judges than anybody before now turn off. That's true. He I dont know if there are more anti gave judges or if every time a republican appointed judges, they seemed antigay, but here's the thing: what is an anti gave judge

Is everything because the Republicans are more about just picking judges that will interpret the constitution and not favour anybody? So I'm going to take my critics comment that there are such things as antigay judges and I'm gonna, give them at least a little more than partial credit. I'm not gonna discount that one because we do it live in a world where judges are not really unbiased entirely. Judges are biased because their human, things, and so that might be a real thing I would say that doesn't matter until. Actually rule on Sunday. The matters, so if they never rule on something probably doesn't matter there was,

Another comment I didn't quite follow about dropping protections in the workplace, but I don't remember what the details that were and are now how many people have effects, but that probably was good point too. I just don't know the details I saw the next one is the interesting one is about trends, trends genders transgender folks in the military, and on that point absolutely true that the president if not the most pro transgender president we ve ever had that would have been Obama and Obama was more permissive, of a transgender and military, the president's orders or his administration apparently, is less. So I think the current situation.

The current situation is that if you are already in the military, you can stay, which is not really a very friendly policy. So that's that sort of anti now sort of that's anti transgender justice, Are you can stay if you're already here, but we yet whether more like you in so I would say that the critics are correct when they say that's more anti trans gender, but I would add this context The military is the one place where discrimination is expressly allowed, if not encouraged. So if you try to take them military use situations and lump it in with any civilian situations. Just becomes nonsense, it sorted nonsense to say that the way we treat.

The military tells us something about the way we treat thrust life because the military is a discrimination organization by design and by universal preference. Let me give you an example? If I went to join the military, would they let me, and now they say, you're a certain age? We cannot lay you and when my when my father went to join the military before World WAR to register weren't just started. My father was not allowed to join because the other had an unusual deformity in his chest, something use Bournemouth. And the doktor said: no, we can't let you in military, because you ve got this just deformity thing and we don't know how that will affect your health

Turns out we lived eighty six or something what every was eighty three eighty six, so I didn't really affect us health in any way that we ever determined, but they discriminate against them for a medical. Motion so that the military is where we ask people to discriminate. We don't stop it. We just make sure that they don't discriminate for stupid reasons. So discriminating against black folks would be a bad reason, because all the evidence suggests that

Everybody's fine in the military doesnt merriwig restlessly is that doesn't make any difference here. We want the best fighters now, so the question on Trans genders is whether they fall into the category than I do, or my father did, which is that there's something about. Is that from a standpoint of looking at the averages that you don't want people like me, you know what people who are you too short to the unhealthy, etc, is expensive and they might affect the readiness now my understanding of transgender in the military. Is it if you're, if we say if you ve had if you ve had your surgeries and euro good, your health is good and proper doesn't make much difference in all, but there must be people

were indifferent stages where they have greater military risks and costs. I think that's the argument, but I would not claim that to be true, because I'm not the expert on the medical conditions of transgender, but here's point if the decision about whether they can It's just the average meaning that there could be plenty of transgender who just don't have that problem there there stable, they don't have the medical problem. There are fit for service. The reply There there are stable. They don't have the medical problem there fit for service there, a plus that can be true and still it would be ok for the military to discriminate because they discriminate against all kinds of classes.

All people short people etc, and surely there are short people who could be good soldiers? Surely there old people who go to operate a drone or do some paper worker should Judah or be a pilot suppose so so the question is in fact a basis. Is the military discriminating in a way that is similar to the other ways there are allowed to discriminate if they are then the then then they're doing the right thing if their discriminating without the benefit of fact. Well, then it is wrong and that should be changed, but I don't know which is, which is the case so to my critics, who said hey, the president is not the most pro algae Bt Q President, because

trends, don't have as much rights as they do for the military as they did under Obama. I rank there criticism. True, absolutely true. Good push back and an accurate correction, and I have to admit that when I, when I have something to eat, I often forget about the tea. In energy Bt Q, but I also have to ask myself: why are they loved in their rank? Why why do you, through transgender, in with gay and lesbian, lay who decided that that's where they belong? Isn't that by itself a little discriminating? If you are transgender.

Would you be delighted that you are thrown in with the gay and lesbian? So you might love, I'm not saying that you dislike that, but from a political perspective, if you're transgender do is that your team is your team. The people who are not transgender, because you do know a gay people are not transgender Dino astray. People are often transgender right, so I don't Oh, how algae, B, T Q makes sense. I gasped gay and lesbian. That makes perfect sense why you want them in a politically Active group, but our know how t belongs in there, but there said my my tweet that this ban, It was the best to all the algae BT. Q is false, false the transgender category and

with the judges and when the selection repents you definitely Some eyebrows going up and that's fair, say pence is irrelevant, he's been silenced and say the entire republican Party has been silenced on at least gay lesbian stuff. Transgender stuff ends up being a little bit more about the budget. And we could be wrong about that- where we could be right about that, and it would be terrible to be wrong about it. But it's not the wrong question, because the military does get too. Discriminate, I then there's one other issue in the same topic, which is there some problem? or there some issue with this administration has reduced access for HIV.

Testing of some kind because of access to stem cells or something like that, and if that makes a difference, then I would say that would also be a good criticism for something that would look, and I urge you to hear in this case- and I can let me and I again Lisbon problem primarily in thy gay. Mostly. So if that's true that say, that's a good point add but here's my question A lot of what the Trumpet administration does is get rid of regulations and and things that just more helping. So it could be true, for example, that climate change is a problem.

While it could be also true they're, getting rid of getting out of the Paris accord, agreement was still the right thing to do so. You have to do. English between the problem and in what we're doing about it, because if what we're doing about the problem doesn't help getting out of that, doesn't mean you don't believe in the problem anymore. Likewise, if whatever the government was doing before I don't know the details, has really helping we stopped doing it. That would be bad, but the less the case. It could be the case that whatever we are doing, with allowing people access to stuff they have another way together, so the government doesn't need to be involved, etc. So and under the details of that, but I am open to criticism so I take my. I take my criticism seriously when it's actually fact based so

the criticism I got in this were all fact based and I take them all seriously. So I appreciate the correction. And I'm getting beat up all day on Twitter about this, so maybe I'll send them to this personal ay. Thanks for that Super hard Herbert by the way any of those who like to reward me for the fun you have during the simultaneous up and Coffee Scott items, you can send a super there's little icon at the bottom of your screen. If you click it, you'll you'll see what that's all of them. Google still ask me as a Nazi, you say well so giving you an update on that. Let's see-

What I'm gonna do myself see what comes up due to do so? It will be a test to see if there are still going me a nazi. Now on that up age, are good as other the first search results they come up, it looks like they ve been scrubbed of the Nazi. The Nazi Photoshop job there. Somebody did on me, but that's probably because probably because at least some of those pictures. At least one of them went to a twitter account that got killed by twitter, so Ferris Fair, let's give credit where credit does do I had a problem with twitter because those a twitter account name to be me in the Nazi uniform.

I reported it using twitters own process. And within one day the account was taken that so, if I may- If I'm being objective Twitter did everything I would ask of Twitter on this topic, I have no nothing but positive to say about this topic about Twitter. Google, however, is another question, because if I were to click the images How far down what I have to go before, I see a picture of me in a Nazi uniform photoshopped. Of course I would never have another. Uniform and then read below that a second one, so Google still has to be listed in the top ten which you would see in your first. If you click Google images and saw my images, it would be

the top down? Now I don't want her to score this, because the. Fact that so many of you went and clicked on it, because I'm talking about it, my be the reason that their surface so high, it could be there. I've just talk about it too much. So there's no way to really know if the algorithm is driving it up at this point, because so many of you clicked on it because I know drew attention to it. Some gonna have to wait a few weeks to see if the rhythm lower them. Naturally, if it doesn't, I would still conclude that Google is a The Google is racist. Basically, there's no other way to say that right, if, if Google,

Either allows or is behind demonization of me- in a Nazi uniform Let me ask you this: would they ever put a non white male and a NASA uniform? Well, you may see a meme somewhere about that, but, generally speaking,. It's an anti white male thing. It's racist! So. Google right now I don't know it does go. We have other racist images that they leave up. Is everything kit Does Google allow any image? That's a real picture. To stay up in their images if it's obviously and unambiguously just a racist image, because I've got to completely races images, so if

If those images don't go down in the rankings or disappear, it's not reverse racism. That just plain or racism Well, let's stop saying reverse. Reverse to it. It's not fuckin reversed as just racism. Well, there's an there's, no other way to paper. Google. Is allowing the racist images another on the top search Now, if that's how they want to be always a week or so, but if that's who Google wants to be, then I will, I will certainly help

their brand. If Google wants to be racist, I will. I will be the first one to help them brand, that hashtag, racist, Google or hashtag Google Racist now racist school was better because, unlike Google, to come up as a model Phil whenever you type and racists, if they keep it but yeah, let's wait a week for that. No, I don't think lawsuit. Lawsuit is not really the way to go on any this, because it's impossible to win lawsuits like us.

Did you know Johnny heart? I met him once the new free speech platforms, doomed. Well, it's the trouble is that the the big social networks have was called the network of fact, if you don't invest in in start ups and tech companies don't know what that the network effect is a network effect. Is that once all of your friends are in one place, such as on Twitter, Facebook, you just leave, because everybody you know is on the other platform so now I would say there is no real chance that the big social networks will have a free speech competitor. Let me tell you why, the day, a new free speech, competitor

ends up was Saint GAB. They have one really really big problem. Who were the first people who go to a free speech app? Who goes first well, who goes first, other people got kicked off the other ones, erases, so real race. Real racists and are being you're your base users, and then people were not racist, they say I like free speech to something they'll go over there and the first thing they realise that their lot races over there. So they have a business model that the free speech apps, have a business model that almost can't work there to figure out how to tweak that business model to prevent that problem.

And in one one of the ways of them. I'm wondering. I'll figure imposed on the ship but suppose ocean held up that allowed you to host to the social media entities. But when it did it also posted automatically to a free speech place so let's say nobody- can join the free speech site, it's impossible to join and you can only join the other sites. But every poet Also shows up as a mere on me sort of a mirror, free speech, site and and and if you ve, Arbed and already been kicked off a twitter then hear year. Your message is goes wherever, wherever its allowed. If you had that, wouldn't you be able over time to build a an audience for this free speech. One

Because it wouldn't be comments on how would you like to have a social media platform that showed all the tweets? But none of the comments- and if you want to see the comments you have to go back to the site of Katy So I'm just brainstorm here, but listen so say you ve got it up the posts. All of your tweets to multiple platforms puts it on twitter, but it also puts learn gab. Maybe it puts it somewhere, and then, if you want to read them fuel red tweets, you just go to the free speech. One, do you see everything but The one thing it doesn't have is no comments because aren't the comments, the bad part, it. If you had a choice of just now, really any dumb ass for all comments, without the applause or a native

somebody saying good so and who suite is designed for a different purpose and that's important, because who'd Swedish optimized for business user we were trying to schedule things and time things and major things and had all the social media stuff, but is there? Awkward and hard to use so I tried to use who'd sweet a few years ago. And it was just so hard that I just stopped using so if you had an app it would have to be as easy to use as just posting a tweet if it's not, as

easy to use as just posting a tweet nobody's, gonna break and use it and who had suite is harder to use than posting a tweet. Somebody says they like the comments, the most well, you, you would still have access to the comments. If you click on the tweet and he wanted to see the comments you were just over to the platform where it where they show the comments. Your tweets appear on gap, My severe on on do that somebody says my tweets appear on gab than true somebody is somebody mirroring them somehow

eggs and you're proposing a magazine. I guess I am you know. I suppose you took all the year, so here's a mile So right now, if I read my twitter feed or any social media feed its in chronological order, suppose you created a social media sites that organised it like a magazine so you would send year you're one message: it would go to twitter, in its normal way and people who comment on it. Everything goes to Facebook, ghost Instagram. If its vets Instagram Mobile, it also goes to a magazine and what magazine does, is it organizes the tweets by topic, so you see all the you see all the tweets on this house to hang on his recent now. Of course, you can always click on hashtag and do that within the social media networks, but still Electra step. It's not edited and organise right, also missing

flip Board FLIP Board is sort of what I'm talking about, except that there's no app the sends one content to all those things, including to flow board. As far as I know, not me too complicated. So aspersion up that lay your posts, all those media sites, including this magazine, anyone and from the app, you can then go read your comments on any one of those sites, some just let you go back and forth from Facebook and swim, twitter or whatever the others a way. Thus, the idea. Nothing that the basic idea is that the current free speech platforms have a problem with their business model than I don't know you can solve, and I will talk to you later.