Bobo Nectar of the gods years of a little too late. I know it. I've been working hard Trying right my new book lost track of the time I M in Vegas at the moment,. I do not come here to drink and gamble and have promiscuous sex. I'm all about the time away from home. To get. My writing is some good food. That sort of thing

right now? You know what time it is. I know you do style for coffee was got Adams, I'm Scott Adams. This is the coffee. You should grab your blog, your Stein, your copy, your glass here container you tell if you will fill it with your favorite liquid, I like coffee and join me for the simultaneous. You have to be ready. Whoever said hold on you can just go be ready. You have to be. laughter area. I think your nose almost eight, so let's talk about in article I tweeted round, you can see it in my twitter feed toward the top by him.

constitutional lawyer, Jonathan, thoroughly,. and I said it was the smartest thing you ever going to read about the topic of the EU. Russia Collusion story as long as well as the the deep state conspiracy story, Here's what I love about it. What the big illusions of life. Is that you think you know what. Reality is unless they on the specific topic you ve got a rebellion, Did you say. I'm sure. I have this right because I can only think of one explanation that would fill the facts So if your trapped in that mental jail, where can only imagine one thing that would fit all the facts: it's always mine, blowing deceased,

they come up with another theory. This is all the facts, and it's just completely different. Give you a few examples that day so thoroughly stake on both the Russia collusion, and the deep state, he doesn't say it as a staple office fact. He says it as a what if. Sir says: what is there I sure collusion story is not true. and at the same time, the deep state, The robust version of it is also not true. What is both sides? operating entirely and a confirmation by us, but were the wise and here's, the gray part were all acting responsibly, but they just had confirmation by us another words:

If the FBI, when they were when they went after Apparently they went after Trump, under the assumption that he might actually be a russian puppet. so totally suggests maybe they actually just thought that was the truth. What is the FBI Simply thought it might be true and they did their best to look into it now, at the same time, The F b I could be riddled with people were biased. So there's nothing to say that detracts from the fact that there could be lots of by his people. But that doesn't change the possibility that there we could also believe what they thought, because, as the most local situation right, sir. I am not mind. Reading talking Jonathan Charlie's article in which he says what, if

So what I saying is true were saying: doesn't fit the facts as well as the other two theories Because the competing theories are that either the state of drunkenness. the whole story- or there is no real deep state and the Trump organs Nation was involved in some kind of collusion. Thing Early presents the third opinion, which is both of them, are imagining it. the emerging different things, but it's all imaginary, which one since the facts, the best now. Thoroughly civilian life. largely matches my own so from the big I've been saying. Oh gather, two things. I dont believe One I dont believe Russia collusion number two.

I believe the deep state is organised, meaning its entirely. It is clear that there are people with deep, deep opinions. But don't you think the FBI has deep opinions about everything. It wouldn't matter. Who is the president? There will be people in the organization with deep opinions about him or her. so it s actually a normal situation. Now people who said to me Yes, but what about? What about those- We also say we leader we need some kind of aid, We need an insurance policy, the Scott how's, that confirmation by us or tell YO, if it's delicious, Charlie's question perfectly

It is entirely possible that the members, the FBI, including struck in page, didn't like trunk as a politician. But also may have believed, he was a danger to the country because he was a russian asset. If they believe that. What would be the most responsible way to act for the FBI or you would have you have a plan to get to the bottom? of it, and you might also, however, be planned. Is a plan didn't work and that aid plan could be he returns policy so I would warn you that whenever you looking at an email and of context, is very difficult to know what it really meant. In the climate gay example, you saw another right, you saw the climate gate, person on the email say.

We can use Michael Man's track. They use the word trick to quote hide the decline Now, if you see that complex, you say my god, it's proof that it serves conspiracy to hide the facts. But if you know how people talk casually when they know each other is just the way people talk, so you're, you're your mathematical technique, I'm gonna call a trick doesn't mean, I don't believe Israel just just ashore arrogant way. Talking about. In hiding hiding the decline was the whole point there were looking at it. There were here to try to explain the decline somebody than email to friends and must try to hide this thing with a strike. Doesn't mean what do you think it means? Will you take it out of context? It could mean that, but the evidence is not there.

likewise with the with the EU, about the insurance really know what that was about safety, I assume that it meant that there were part of a deep state plot. Let me be very careful about this. Neither neither theory is either confirmed or ruled out the beauty of what I am talking about is that there are now three world views which all fit the observed facts they offer. What we know so far fits all three I bought. This is in the sense that none of them are ruled them. There was some boy I expect we will rule out some of them. Let's make some predictions. Let me ask you this. If the now that we know that the FBI was legitimately well, listen,

also legitimately, Now that we know from the New York Times reporting that the FBI, the investigation on Trump, because they were Actually concerned that he was a russian asset. So that's, I think that does enough in evidence, even or even are fake news world that we could probably suggestion that they. Maybe I was actually concern at this. Point Buller has been looking at this for many months. Let me ask you this: his mother- had found evidence. The president Trump, was a russian asset, What are you still be in office? Ask yourself you know, we don't know what mauler has come up with. So we can

yes exactly what he's gonna say at the end,. but do you believe there is any chance, even even any chance, just any chance at all The mother has discovered the pool, is running Trump and he's dead. I did to wait think that mother would wait if he had found that are not achieved. Suppose he was. Fifty percent sure supposed just Adam, Solid looking evidence, but not solid enough or say he was fifty percent sure Would we already know that. Absolutely, we would know that because there is no way that smaller. would allow that size of a risk to keep running with with the country just hang up there with the risk. Putin is actually running the country at the very least, the topic of

Maybe temporarily taking the president and the playing field, I replied him with pence. Woe. Just find out or something of that nature. So I would say it point the odds that smaller can confer. Anything like russian collusion or russian Russian asset, or anything like that, is pretty close to zero. Because nothing were observing would be consistent with him. Having strong evidence that again, there were Worley predict the future, but we say that there's another one, another bit of evidence, one the great. So there too, weird contradictions, This all Russia Collusion story.

One of the weird one of the weird inconsistency is: is that calmly was? first blamed for so doing something that was bad for Clinton. meaning a few weeks before the election. He talked about their their open. There are open case looking into arenas. No, that was unambiguously bad for Clinton and clubs and will be the first one to tell you that, But then later acone did things which seem unambiguously bad for President Trump. How does the hell is that state conspiracy, work. if comas, on both sides that doesn't make sense in so. So if you look at the truly above is, is it explained commies actions perfectly. It explains it.

thought there might have been a real problem with Russia thing and he also was simply trying to do his job now I said when, when the initial. Oh me announcement came out about Clinton right before the election ice, something that allowed people hated ice. And I don't know how many other people said this, but it was a very unusual opinion. I said they call me, is probably doing this because he feels it is his duty. And what I meant was he had this knowledge about the ongoing investigator. and it would have been unfair for the public to go into the voting booze not knowing what he knew He didn't know more than the fact that was an investigation they didn't know have would end but he wanted us to know that, because if we, It sounds later when should be pretty,

angry that it simply saying the accusing me of migrating, that's that's the fair question. That's Am I migrating or am I looking at a series of the world in trying to see if the data fits the theory or does it. What I'm telling you Isn T the Jonathan Turley theory, which he just suggest is not tell you it's true But he suggests that both sides are just operating. Confirmation buys would perfectly explain, commies inconsistency. ass if you were part of it, if he had been part of a deep state blood from the beginning does, explain why he would have damaged Hillary Clinton in such a visible way while at the same time another time in other times is damaging trump. Likewise,.

The Russians, conspiracy theory kind of falls, apart with the fact that the russian troll this also means that were anti Hilary have Can you explain that the Russians were making some programs means and some pro Hilary means most of them were approach trump, but if your job, is the support trump? Why in the world, would you ever make some letter the opposite? This completely unexplained, so. Thoroughly explanation does explaining it. Would you say that were message with us like they always do just trying to make the system of less, possible, less dependable, less credible. That would be bad for us, whatever the Russians. maybe they're just testing, maybe there to see if they can make any difference. Some like that. But

Now, some of you, you say, wait a minute. obvious: that their Brennan clapper are dirty because. At least half the country. Looking at the story, or maybe forty percent of the country, the saying, oh, my god, it's obvious that those two guys are dirty part of the deep state conspiracy. Well consider this. The dossier didn't originate with the FBI. were the recipients of it and it was information they didn't know if it was true. Certainly, we can agree that the Democrats were trying to take on trumped up. There is no question of that right. Regrets funded the dossier. The does he was full of the US,

The FBI sand is pretty clear that the Democrats were behind a scheme that personal question. But in Britain and Clapping clapper are clearly partisan. If you were who take shortly theory that everybody is operating on confirmation by us. It's all perfectly consistent with what I just described. you ve got some partisans doing what is good for partisans and of course they are trying to take our trump but they're doing those partisans there, it way every other parties is doing it, and that, isn't necessarily proof of a grand conspiracy. So here you have three, serious unreality, either so deep state setting up trump with a fake.

Does he think Russia delusion or President Jump really is abundant bonnet were both size are operating under confirmation by us in work, mostly trying to do what they thought was right? Let's make a prediction. I make the following protection: one? No one will ever get to go to jail or be impeached for Russia collusion or for being a russian asset of some kind number two. There will never be a deep state plot that we have specific definite knowledge.

about another words, will never have an email, the says everybody, let's meet for the deep state or whatever see. If something is obvious, is that we get together and try to take out the specimen for political ends, If there is information that the F B, I was tryin to take trompe l because they thought maybe he was a political puppet, that's a different version or upload butter or so years, protection, no convictions and no engagements the deep stateside or on the trunk pollution said there will be plenty of convictions and people getting fired. Fourth doing things patient done for two investigators, four things unrelated to the central, clean, etc, I have explained the Petersburg email, in which insurance that word insurance taken out of context.

You should not assume that you know what he meant when we hear the context. I don't know if we ever will probably is more common than some kind of weird conspiracy fell at the look at my notes here, So yours, here's another thing. I told you the other day. Remember I told you that the story about see you in asking the local station that was near the border San Diego station? I guess the story was seen and ask them if they could talk to somebody at that new station to get information about and then the story goes that when they local station said that that walls work,

The CNN decided not to not to go with it, so that was a story. When I heard the story, I came on periscope and I said fake news The most normal thing world is four seasons: producers to reach out, see about doing something, and then not necessarily do that thing that they looked into so four times that producers look into things is much higher. the number of times that they go with the thing they looked into now I live and work in this world, so I know, for example, that producers content me that leave and do a peer review and then decide not to do that story. Very and so when CNN was was accused of backing off because they didn't want.

report, your real news. You know me, I'm a big credit, big critic of Siena, I'm a big critic of Siena, Others, obviously fake news Siemens producer just look into it and decided not to do it for whatever see that explanation was that they talked lots of different. people networks in only went with them after they looked at all the things that now that was what I told you would be the case. And so in some of you were saying some of you say no, no, it's not, for no reason is because of bias. You cannot rule out by us, but

But you would be doing mind reading to assume recipes, because it's not an evidence, let labor it differently: The only thing this in evidence is produced, Those we're doing what produces do, which is to say they checked. things and they don't usable we think in evidence. It is also true that the real They didn't uses because I didn't think you would fit the narrative. That could be true, but it's not an evidence. And some of you are imagining that I said see: another is not biased, really imagining anything

I just said right now is that the system is not biased it's pretty much, the opposite of what I just said so The king story is interesting because the king given his, response and he said very clearly unambiguously that he rejects when nationalism and way supremacy. and he said it in the clearest possible terms. And then he also said that all of us, actions of his life for a consistent with that he is gonna tough case to make the eye. I don't see how people are.

To understand the comments he has made in the past as being consistent with his clarification? So I think he's got a big problem. Here. Looks like that story, just sort of way. When we talk about. Have I told you my theory about how I think that humans, largely for the most Can we invent themselves were better versions of themselves. In other words and Oliver technology that we invent is really. extension of a human suffering,

pull yourself. Your smartphone is an extension of you just talking to people in communicating person, your car terribly nor extensions of your feet, your building to walk places, etc. Now. We have this interesting situation in which. Social media is taking parts of our personality, so I said this before that Facebook feels like you're your heart You know it's all about your loved ones and the things you remember spell your heart twitter seems to be about your brain. Now. Your brain doesn't always works so well, but neither does twitter in terms of determined, AEGIS. Sorry,

says: they're, afraid that the deep state is controlling me. Another gave to worry about that so you ve got twitter this, like the mind of the internet, because that's really ideas. Facebook is about your heart, here's my family or something I love your food, Ella, etc. Instagram is like your visual sense is vanishes. Your eyes is just your eyes, pictures of them. So It feels as though we are Inventing a god like super entity which is the sum the sum of all the stuff for doing so were developing godlike powers as as a total of humanity, that's greater than anything in the individual can do, and

You were actually talking about Gmos, Engineering we're talking about climate change, which I'm not gonna, do today we're talking about changing the clock and changing the acidity of the ocean and literally g orange here and as we're looking at owing to Mars and you're, going to plan a sitter uninhabitable. there are serious gambling serious conversations about to take a barren planet and use our technology that we don't kwairyo about. Then I think we ve got it. We ve got it at least the toll in it It's a GEO engineer, a new planet who is it who can create a planet god right, as the story goes So one theory that you cannot rule out is that God is both her

future and our past, meaning that Once humans have invented all the parts of God, the the eyes in the ears of the brain in the heart. That'll be sort of a super entity that actually is almost autonomous seeing what to us and will be able to create worlds and here's the fun park. It will be able to create life. I believe It will be able to create life. No, you said yourself: now you get free life, we ve tried, but we can write. Computer simulation and lacking, Peter simulation will be characters said the boy Eve within the simulation than real and that are alive, and they have a world. and we may be in fact one of the simulations, so would be hard to imagine anything that is a God power that

human beings will have in my lifetime. we're almost there. Will we ever fully domesticate dogs like the random question? There are lots of comments about Christina today But if you didn't see, there's very funny mean about the two of us? I have to do with that. I'm to India. Yeah, I'm pretty sure that somebody asked me if I smoked weed for every single periscope overburden. The answer is only about ten percent.

Will I do the job Rogan show again, while I would always be willing to do it because it was a real experience. I think Cherokees sort of a national treasure for the stuff that he does. but have also maybe talk about you, the persuasion ass. I I need another, book. Another reason to go on, and so maybe, but We need a better reason than I ever knew. I can't wait until Kearny goes on european soil. Can you imagine how great task will be.

Oh yeah answered where the blade authorities other there's some good things happening there that not ready to talk about but I do want to give you some ideas that came out of them. process. Some ideas about you conceptually what to do with some of these late. Cleared areas and I'll probably do special periscope on them. Have you been to Detroit. I have. I too think outside for today. Let me check my notes that are behind my bed compeers citing quota for today. I that's oftener I'll talk to you later.