Topics:
- Adam Schiff seems sad that our President isn’t a Russian puppet
- Real bad week for CNN…their 2 best hoaxes are down
- They lost the Russian Collusion Hoax
- They’ve (almost) lost the “Fine People” Hoax
- My “Slaughter Meter” reading on if the 2020 was held today
- The IF Hunt that used to be the Mueller Witch Hunt
Donate to support my Periscopes and Podcasts:
I also fund my Periscopes and podcasts via audience micro-donations on Patreon. I prefer these methods over accepting advertisements or working for a “boss” somewhere because it keeps my voice independent. No one owns me, and that is rare. I’m trying in my own way to make the world a better place, and your contributions help me stay inspired to do that.
See all of my Periscope videos here.
Find my WhenHub Interface app here.
Below is a demonstration of a personal DONATE button you can add to any blog or web page. All you need is a free account on the Interface by WhenHub app.
The post Episode 462 Scott Adams: The Mueller Witch Hunt is Evolving Into an “IF” Hunt appeared first on Dilbert Blog.
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
Awful awful boom boom pow boom boom. Any John come on in here, Nicole, it's good to see you or it's good, to see your name go by virus, Joe, always a pleasure Andrew good to see you all right. So I can't tell you that I have something exactly planned for this periscope.
I just wanted to share it, so I'm only here to share the moment so that those of you watch my periscope's can
you can come in and just just experience the moment just sort of enjoy it now. The thing we don't know- and I feel a little anxious about the fact that we don't know.
Exactly what's in the mall report, so maybe there's something bad in there, but
Indications that there's not anything bad in there goes like this number. One CNN is really depressed.
And I'm going to do a thing where a a going to play- whatever CNN clip is playing at the moment, and I want to see how sad they sound alright, this is on plan and I'm just gonna turn on CNN and I want to just hear the the Senate has whoever's talking. I don't I don't know the size sometimes passed on
What is it what they call the gang of eight that I that was Wolf, that he's no good? I want a pundit, so the on air personalities will be a little bit more like they always are. There are professionals, but the pundits you just gotta, listen to the pundits, so will wait for a way for a pundit come on here, information that that Robert Muller may have collected. So if it's just passed out to the so called gang of eight and you're a member of the gang of eight, I am never the gang of eight but the head of the agency simply to come in until
members of Congress. What happened now there may be a select subset of information that they is it just Maine or does Adam Schiff not sound as happy as normally you would be on a Friday afternoon.
Is it just me.
Or is Adam Schiff, a little bit sad that the President of the United States is not a russian spy. He seemed so sad that the president, the commander in chief, is not a russian puppet, feel so bad poor, Adam. So the other indication we have that there will not be a prob
for the president and say he's already said he wants to release it now. It might not get fully released, but he he says so, and he probably wouldn't want to say that as clearly if he thought there was something bad in there, so probably they've signaled to him.
There is no big deal. Next, we have the information of that Bill bar who just got the report. The attorney general.
Saying that he might release at least a summary of the findings as soon as this weekend,.
Do you think there's any chance? He would have said that if it was a problem.
I think, if any of it looked sketchy, he would have said very give me some time. I'm not quite sure how this is going to go. Gotta show it to the president's lawyers. They might take some executive privilege gotta write up my
Three give me some time. That's what you would say if there was some bad news of their Good NEWS, given that you know he's on the team trump is such a sensual, yet you know being a
republican type good news travels fast. So the fact that he wants to do it quickly doesn't guarantee it's good news for the President, but it's a strong indication so another none of these individual
our guarantees, but they all are pointing in the same direction, including the sadness that we here from the Democrats
Now, as my sort of it's just, we did very recently, two of the biggest hoax is, let's say or fake news, whatever you want to call them fake news or hooks to the biggest and most danger
ones in the history of the republic were the weapons of mass destruction. I mean look at many, people died, look with that cost and then the Russia collusion, who was a principal character behind both of those John Mccain. John Mccain, was a principal figure.
Behind the two most damaging hoaxes in all of history, and I never I never made that connection. I was MIKE sort of inches tweet that was. It was like a slap in the face to me to me that makes it okay as anything you want about to me. Well, you know the
I'd say the seal is broken war hero sure he can keep that, but he owns the two biggest disgraces and less. I don't know thirty years, whatever it's done so those are his now I sent Scott always in spin mode, have, I said anything
it isn't true. Yes, I play say something that isn't true. You should call me out so now. The other thing I'm watching is watching CNN. Try to
Two turn this into. Well, we told you all along. There was something here, even though there isn't so they've got several lines of attack that there's sort of a be testing live. One of those lines of attack. Is that sure you showed us
Mueller's report, but you didn't show me the raw evidence that Mueller looked at and Adam Schiff just before I came out and was trying to explain why in this case they should see the raw evidence when normally that would not be the case and have said well, it could be.
That there's something that didn't rise to the level of being illegal, but the problems, the president still did it and it's bad, to which I say the president is still a citizen of the United.
It's right, you got to draw a line somewhere. Yes, the president is a public figure and
Nobody is above the law and nobody would claim that should be the case.
But is it also the case that he's not below the law? The president doesn't get treated worse than other people under the law.
That's not acceptable, and would you want to be the subject of a criminal investigation in you know technically this,
the criminal investigation. Would you want to be the subject of an investigation? The conclusion is that you've done nothing wrong and then your critics get to see all,
all the evidence because you know if unskilled people dig through the evidence, they're going to imagine they found all kinds of crimes
the molar being experts said no, that's not a crime. That's not a crime, that's out of context, so
if you wouldn't want that to happen to you and I sure what
when it happened to me. You should not want that to happen to anybody. You should want to happen to the president or anybody else now. The other thing that CNN is
just try it out. Is the old? Well, what about those? Was it sixteen people who got indicted for lying to investigators and Sandra lying to Congress, so they keep trying to say some version of this? Well, you can say them.
The thing was a failure because they went out to hunt an elephant and they shot. Sixteen squirrels you.
You can't tell me that an elephant hunt is unsuccessful when I've shot. Sixteen squirrels.
Do you see the number of squirrels I shot. Don't tell me this wasn't on point. Yes, yes, we marketed as a an elephant hunt. We brought an elephant gun. We
plan to shoot an elephant, we really really hoped we were going to get an elephant, but don't tell me we're not successful. Cuz, look at the number of squirrels we shot. Instead, that my friends is success,
So the try that out then they're also trying out the if we don't have the raw evidence. Let you know how it, how could we really know what happened.
Um, oh they're, also trying out the the trump did not personally go in for an interview, so their best attack so far is that the president did not agree to
a perjury trap. He didn't agree to a perjury trap, that's the worst thing they have on him an, and
given that sixteen squirrels got killed in the elephant hunt, because they all fell into a perjury trap, how many of them were smart? Well, just the elephant, the squirrels all fell in the elephant trap. If you know what I mean, but the elephant, no, the elephant did not go into the trap. The elephant said you can't make Maine and then he didn't go now. I have to give some kudos again. This is premature.
But it's starting to look like this would be the case, some kudos to the president's legal team. Now I don't know if they did things wrong, but by keeping him from preventing him from
I'm from going in for an interview was certainly right and they did get away with yeah
they very patient. They just kept checking
yeah chipping away. They were running out the clock. I think you have to admit that the president's legal team was running out the clock because they knew the Muller couldn't just do mauler things forever.
You know: everything's got a hand so the longer they resisted the more likely Muller was going to say. I can't wait forever and I can't make you do it.
So, I think they just ran out the clock on Miller, which you would have to say it was a good lawyer. It was
exactly the right strategy, which, apparently and again, you know we're looking at it from the outside. So we might be missing some of the important context here, but it looks like it looks like the President
legal counsel, brought it home for him, but will say
All right, yeah
there was no collusion. The other thing I expect to hear is when there's no finding of collusion people are going to say, I told you there would be no finding of collusion, because that's not even a crime, people will
continue to say yes, but although there was no crime- and there was no collusion, the president obstructed with the injustice, so, in other words, the treating this treating the situation as if there had been russian collusion, was really based on an injustice, the injustice being the Steele dossier. So what the president did was if anything,
He obstructed injustice now we know that, because Miller has already ruled we think again getting ahead of myself
but assuming there's no collision. He would have ruled in that case that but there's no crime. So there was no justice to be had. So, if you obstruct injustice, is that a crime
I suppose it would be yeah the FISA warrants. I don't know if those would be released. That's a good question.
Yeah they're going to point to the New York Southern district, but I think we would have seen indictments right if they were. If anything was going to be an indictment when wouldn't we see them when we, if
if any of that really mattered, I heard wasn't. Creeper are talking about how I'm, if all they have is the co and stuff might be a fine yeah if everything that they think they know about the current payments to Stormy Daniels are true. If all of the facts are true, there might be a fine business as usual, so I could not even watch Fox news with this news came out. As you know, Fox NEWS is just going to be happy, and you know I told you so and max
you know, you know it's gonna be a little predictable, but watching CNN deal with their cognitive dissonance is amazing. Is this week alone they lost russian collusion. They probably came pretty close to losing the fine people. False memory.
And things are going pretty well for the president, so I would like to introduce to you a new new prediction mechanism that I'm going to be using for twenty slash. Twenty all right. I call it the slaughtered meter. Please
meter. So it's not an opinion poll. Yes, my prediction of what the election would look like if we, if all the variables we see now continue in a straight line, so in other words, if we, if we froze all the variables today and just you know fast forward two years, you'd have a super-
on the con me because remember we're freezing all the variables super strong economy. North Korea would be you know, bang better than they have been before ISIS is, is being the the Democrats. Don't have anybody with any charisma whatsoever? It looks like the best plan on the democrat side is to nominate to try to get rid of trump who they would consider
an old white male? Their strategy is to nominate an even older whiter mail, so
they have the worst strategy. I've ever seen and they're going to completely savage each other until whoever is left will be walking husk of a person which Trump will finish off much. He will finish off. I was going to say something terrible, but I'm not going to, but it would be very funny only to me mostly so here's my current prediction, which will be updated periodically between now and two thousand and twenty the slaughter meter is pinned. We are at maximum slaughter. If
Variables changed, in other words, if the russian collusion turns out to be the nothing we think the economy is good. The yeah you, you name it. You just couldn't right down the line. If all of that sticks, the worst thing that they're going to say about the president is that the frickin John Mccain vote and hit him from maybe doing something good with healthcare. So right now
He is incomplete, slaughter territory. Now the odds of things staying the same and all of the variables stay, the same between now and two thousand and twenty and the election is very low, so don't make too much of the slaughter meter right. The slaughter meter is unrealistic by design is just telling you that if nothing changed, it would be a slaughter um. The funniest thing is watching the polls. They say well, here's a very important point by the way you're probably saying to yourself, but how does that.
Track with the fact that every single Democrat seems to be Trump in a in a one on one. According to the polls like how could that be possible at the same time he's heading toward a slaughter and here's how it's possible
If you're saying would x whatever Democrat and is lined up against drunk you're, not really comparing those two people it feels like, you are to say, say consider by then with Trump. You know who do you like who vote for one of them? It feels like you're comparing those two people but you're, not because in those situations
well, no, there is not yet a real Democrat who's been nominated, so their idea of the Democrat, even if you put a specific name, even if you say what, if it's biting what, if it's burning you want, if it's Camilla, even if you put a specific name in there, there's still
Thinking well, how do I, like my ideal Democrat vs this this bastard Trump,
as long as they're thinking about their ideal Democrat. That ideal Democrat is awesome. The person who's potentially a candidate against Trump, has no flaws there great
But what happens when it turns into a real person by the time it's a real person, you're going to have to compare the real person, not your magical notion of what a great candidate would be, but a real beating up flawed person. So adding pull you see today is just sort of a wishful thinking poll about a perfect candidate versus the stand Trump guy,
you know. So I wouldn't worry about the polls too much today. Now here's my prediction about this whole Russia collusion thing. I assume that the results will come out and if things go, the way it looks so go there will be not much of any kind of a finding. There would be too damaging to the president, and I predict that the NASH
all polls about whether or not Trump colluded with Russia will not change more than ten basis points.
So right now, probably I'm just guessing that the country's probably split about evenly. You know the Republicans say you didn't glue the right, the the Democrats say, definitely colluded once we have Muller's report. If this were a rational world, ninety,
percent of the world on you know both sides would agree with whatever Muller came up with, because I'd say: well, he looked into it. I me at every tool of investigation. He looked into it and if you didn't find anything, the region is the standard that we should. We be worried about. I change my mind. I used to be worried, but now the new data has come in. I change my mind based on logic and fair.
Listen new data you're not going to say anything like that, you're going to see the Democrats just as convinced that the collusion happened, give give or take five to ten basis points. So it might go from fifty to forty but you're not going to see it go down to ten percent which it
It would if we were a rational species, so this will be another one of those cases where you can you can protect and by the way, I always tell you that, if your filter on the world critics well, that is a good,
filter, my filters as people are immune to data and facts so that the vast majority of them will not change their minds. Even when the data changes. Alright, I am going oh Schumer Schumer's speaking. Oh, we gotta see droopy dog. Let's see, give me a second the integrity of our democracy itself, whether foreign powers, corruptly interfere in our elections and whether unlawful means were used. I don't want to play too much for copyright reasons, but in my title for this periscope I said that the witch Hunt has evolved to and if Hunt an Schumer was demonstrating that so here's how the if hunt goes, there's no evidence that the president anything bad so they'll say if there's evidence that we don't have
and if it shows that the president had an affair with Putin and if, as a result of that affair, Putin is blackmailing the president, there were a lot of trouble and if the President, she currently has a deal with Russia and if we don't get to see all the data in the in the reports, the mall report and if something isn't complete and if the president had actually gone in and talked a mile or in person instead of giving written lessons, it is all those things happened. That's a problem! That's a problem! If all of those things that
and so you listen to all this and you come away thinking. Well, that's a lot of accusations about the present. That is a lot of accusations uh. So so you end up you end up with after after the. If hunt you end up walking away having this bad feeling about the president, because so many bad things were just sort of mentioned. Well,
If Chuck Schumer is having an affair with his dog and if the dog is not a willing participant and if the dog is tiny, let's say a chihuahua an if that tiny chihuahua is injured with the sexy is having with Chuck Schumer and if we find out about it.
Chuck Schumer's in a lot of trouble. Would you say, did I say anything here? That is not the truth. If he's having sex with his dog, if the dog is a Chihuahua, if Muller is injuring him, also he's a bad guy, I'm not saying any buddies suggests
he's done any of those things, I'm not suggesting it. I'm just saying that if he has and if there was a report on it and if somebody produced a video of it an if there are witnesses,
How bad would that be? I mean that would be bad. We certainly hope nothing like that happens and there's no evidence of this. Let me be very clear: there is no evidence whatsoever that I'm aware of, but that doesn't mean somebody else isn't where 'cause. If someone else is aware of it and if he had sex with his dog and if it was a chihuahua and if he heard it pretty bad
really bad, that's bad! Alright, I just had to come on here and enjoy the moment with you. Keep watching the news have a fun time. I'll talk to you later.
Transcript generated on 2019-11-10.