Bump, bump, bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump bump, oh, what a terrific morning, it is a great one. Today, you're all gonna, just love the next few moments we spend together like You always do good to see you all Michel Jordi, Jim pleasure, but before we get going before we get to good stuff. Letters enjoy a little thing called the simultaneous it doesn't take much to participate. No, it doesn't. I need, is a copper mugger, glasses, Snifter Stein, showers, Tankard Thermos last Kantian, GRAIL goblet vessel of any kind Zella with your favorite liquid. I like coffee,

And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the don't mean the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better, the simultaneous gulp- ah maybe my imagination, but I feel my maid okay we're getting stronger, I think it was this up. He made me feel in the to start with a few things. So lately The guests were even I've, been saying that I was sceptical about all these stories of China killing people to make transplants available other people, the people, that they would be allegedly killing were prisoners of some sort, political or otherwise, and I said to myself really

there are keeping people alive and then just taken their parts and giving them to other people. Am I might take on there was sound totally right. And then, as is often the case and by the way I talk about this in my book, loser think after what one of the tips in this book is, if you don't know how to do something right, try doing it wrong in public Watch how much free advice you get? I do this all the time you say that probably probably a dozen times. If you watch, watches periscope One of the things that I did wrong in public apparently was my opinion.

the chinese organ transplant story is probably more bs than true and that attracted that attracted a lot of a lot of advice and information. So here's my current thinking on it, So what I heard was- and this was the part I was sceptical- about The reason people believe this was happening all these killing people just for their organs, is it the schedule we're getting an organ over. There was so short, and I thought to myself: that's it. That's all you know Oh, you know is that is easy to get an organ. I could be other reasons. One reason could be: is not really that easy. You just heard it was or was easy for some people who pay a lot of money to go to the top of the list. Maybe you heard is easy, but it's not really is so. That was by assumption that probably just the information is right.

Does it seem to me that you would have some kind of direct directed innovation, somebody who say: oh yeah, we do it at this hospital sublet that players from stories yesterday, you just put him altogether freighted. Then you can decide whether China has a ongoing massive arbitration to kill people on demand for organs. Here's what you need to know a years ago, a friend of mine needed a heart transplants. So I learn a little bit about the system, if you are on the list to get a hearty transplant you necessarily get the heart just because you're at the top of the list and one becomes available khazar other variables What are the variables is, how far away you are and how quickly you could get in the hospital for the operation.

So my friend, who was not at the top of the list and not really in very close to the top of the list, probably would have been dead in a year or so got lucky. I hate to say that, because his luck depended on somebody else dying in just there place at just the right time, so he is a phone call and they say we got a heart commanding in will learn. On the table right away Any useful, eager drive at that point in his heart was failing, but he was still reasonably functional. He had his car and he said our anal DR right in and they said no, we descended the ambulance time and time is so critical that we don't why you driving your own car here will be fast enough. have an ambulance meet you at the restaurant, where you're eating, I will take you directly in the hospital puts red on the table

No, that's not it all unusual that the timing is so critical that you can actually moved to the top of the list just by being in the right place and having read characteristics, they make you ready for the operation. Here's another fact I learn do you know why you can sell an organ for fairly in China could be over a hundred thousand dollars for an organ major organ. How many parts can you get from one dead guy? You can get a lot of parts right. One dead guy does a one organ for a hundred thousand dollars. How much is the entire dead guy worth one million dollars, something like that? Bloodless Culloden, let's say a dead guy. If

or selling that dead persons organs, maybe half a million dollars. What half a million dollars worth in China. Well, half a million dollars worth a lot anywhere. Would people do things illegal for half a million dollars and may remember this is one body is: is this this is happening the way, its alleged it's a whole operation? One of the stories I heard is, as somebody who is a in Oregon tourist, went there to get a guinea, but had some kind of compatibility issue and so had to get another operation and another and another and actually had eight kidney transplants. Each one. a new candy until the eighth one was compatible and worked. If it's true that China is killing people under ban

for organs that one guy cause a people to be murdered for their organs, Maybe they would have been killed anyway, never known, but that's a sort of thing. This being alleged again, I'm just gonna, say alleged until I watch it with my own eyes, but I'll give you the data. So, as I often say, I think I said it in when Bigley. When you have a situation where somebody can make a lot of money and they have a low chance of getting caught, you always have bad behaviour. The they're probably will never be an exception. To this rule, huge upside potential gains financial, say a very low chance of getting in trouble. How often does that cause bad behaviour? Honour presented

So we have the set up for to cause trouble on representing time unless the government was actively cracking down on it and all the evidence suggests there's nothing like that happening, so you got so the money is there, the incentive is there and then apparently as a large supply of prisoners, because some suggestion that the military well. Maybe the military presence worldly some connection to the military have something and with it the rumours are also that the flume gum religious organisation, if you can call it that are sort of, I don't know what to call them exactly cult, religion, movement, but the He thought is that they are using the people that there are pressing for political reasons or does using them for parts and cutting them up, and

So that's the allegation now my first thought was well. Are we sure that, just because people can get things whenever they want them, that's what they're really means, because I still think there are two possibilities here. Still two possibilities were is that there are killing people on demand, so hey we weren't gonna, kill you anyway. We weren't gonna, kill you before, but now we're gonna kill you because we need your parts. So that's one possibility and strongly suggested by all the evidence, but there is one other possibility. Catlett was, if you can guess what is the other possibility? There will explain the same set of facts, but is not China killing people just four part?

the prisoners. I say there is one other explanation: can you think of awe and they can't be already dead? They have to be basically brindle brain dead embody alive, or were you kill them just for the parts? Otherwise you can't take a dead person and take centre and take their parts and so on. The part of no good is already dead. That is correct. Somebody as guest somebody guest accurately, the other possibility, is that they murder, so many people number but was a death sentence. The other possibility is that they kill so many people routinely that they have an enormous pool of parts as they were going to kill him anyway. So you know if they going to kill him anyway, unless they in China. Maybe they don't have any rights. If there are prisoners, I don't know what the deal.

Then maybe they can just say well is wasted parts. We were going to kill him anyway, so in that case the real. The real issue is the genocide. So there are only two possibilities that I can think of their maybe other possibilities, maybe somebody or come up with one, but the two I can think of is that there are killing people for parts or their such a massive genocide. This going on as a routine amount of business that they're just say. Well, we have all these parts had drowned. Lies will sell in that. and the people were saying they can get, they can get. Organs on demand are probably rich people, so it might not be that anybody can get a power under man could be only rich people because european alone, money, which would mean if you had tons people your executing anyway, and you don't have that many rich people,

rich people could get apart on demand without anything happening. That would suggest there doing it just for the organs. So there is still some question about what's going on, but I think there are two possibilities: either China is acting like Hitler

or acting worse than Hitler, if as genocide than their acting like Hitler. If it's a genocide in which there are killing them and using their parts and selling them is worse than Heller, do you feel me if all he's doing as genocide? That's the holocaust. Let's does equal to Hitler, but is there also selling the parts and part of it is financial, maybe a little worse. So those are the two possibilities. Why do we do business with China? Why do we do business with China seriously? Oh by the way, I said yesterday that somebody reported that delivered outcome was blocked in China, and then I got a second report from somebody also,

in China who said it is not a third person said it's possible that both are true and may be blocked in some places and not in others. So we still don't know if Gilbert outcome is block, but if I'm not going to work on get blocked because. If you want to ignore a holocaust, I guess that's on you and I'm not going to ignore it, and just given the China killed my son, I think I might mention that they're involved in a

not like Holocaust and we're just doing business with them like it's. Nothing, that's actually happening in your lifetime, you're part of a system that is doing business with China, while they do genocide on their own population or their selling their population for parts, one of those two things and we're doing business with them, while they're killing fifty thousand Americans a year with their traditional intentionally right in front of us. No doubt about what I say: China killed my son. You simply asking about this. My steps on died of a sentinel overdose a year ago and that sentinel comes from.

Here's little update. You remember the story about the big shoot out between the cartel and the mexican police and the cartel one. The mexican police had picked up the son of the of L chopper. I guess I'll chapel son was the new head of the cartel. Please take em up and the cartel had so much firepower that they brought in immediately trucks, technicals and trucks, with machine guns and stuff that they actually the police and the police release them, and then yesterday I found out that the reason that L, L, chapel son was picked up is wait for it. He was starting. He was in charge of the sentinel,

So the main I think the main might have been one of the main or they name Sentinel connection. The chinese sentinel goes to mexican cartels first and then they ship it into the United States, but this guy seem to be one of, if not the main fence nor guy in China, so he was picked up because the America that because the United States asked for extradition, so he was whatever the legal process is, so the Mexicans were picking up before the United States, but they got a gun. Now. Let me ask you this, given that we just saw amounts offence Norm United States that can wipe out every person the state is not the whole country. Clearly these are weapons of mass destruction. clearly the mexican government is L Band and clearly is killing fifty there, thousand people a year in our country, The name of the guy, and probably we.

locate some assets owned by the cartel Why are we not going in there militarily? Now? I assume worth trying other mechanisms, but I would say we are completely clear, Zander Sand, drones and therein take out as much of the cartels will not. In fact, I would love that conversation. I would love the mexican government decided was David United States. Why are you defying our sovereignty? Well, I'll tell you this because you lost your sovereignty, you don't have any sovereignty if the if the cartel can decide who goes to jail and who doesn't there's no mexican government, why? Why should we please the mexican government where it doesn't exist and then the cartel held territory's, there's no mexican government? So if anybody wants to come,

lay in about his droning, the cartels. It would have to be the card there is so so I am in favour of military action against cartels about I'm sure, there's lots more to now. Then I don't know. Let's talk about, I tweeted round a humorous video appears to be Joe Biden looking in the wrong direction, while he's on stage speaking as if he doesn't know which direction is must be fair, I deleted it because I was informed those misleading because affair,

neither was audience on both sides of the stage, but only but the camera was only on one side. So when Joe was at his back to the camera, the the implication was, he was confused and they didn't know which way was up but actually use just making sure we gave some attention to the people who were off camera below him, so that was Lou misleading, but how easily we believed the Joe Biden didn't know which direction the audience. Was it and let me tell you, ve done it think I lost something here. I needed up. Here's here's the worst comment on you, the Ukraine situation that I've seen this was on the internet. I like to point this out because, when you see really bad opinions, there's their somehow entertaining. So I give you this bad opinion for entertainment.

so somebody said and it's bad because it uses sort of a mocking sarcastic own while being a really dumb comment, which is the perfect combination. Yoke is he's acting little arrogant. and really wrong at the same time, which is aware is here it is Read it like an arrogant guy, I've just kind of curious, just kind of curious. Why don't you explain to me Scott? I'm just gonna curious when the ukrainian corruption and potential interfered, because

The top priority for the nation is certainly not one day that ever gets talked about or that ever got talked about by this administration. Until now, why is it a top priority? Suddenly, Scott, can you explain that why? Why didn't nobody cared about Ukraine before, but suddenly Scott Scott? You tell me about a top priority. What changed? Why do we care about ukrainian corruption? Now because Biden is leading in the polls and by NASA connection to Ukraine, is then that kind of obvious that divided we're not,

Leading in the balls- and he does not have an obvious publicly known connection to financial goings on in ukraine- and there were- and there were not- some information are proud strike. Having ukrainian thing was the worst comment about the ukrainian thing. That I've seen is that here's, if you saw this Steve Ban and had an interview with Anderson Cooper, I seen him really interesting, because banning does a better job than most people in making his case. What happens when somebody does a good job of making their case for Trump

answer then. Did you see what happened? They Anderson just talk over him, because burden was doing. Is such a good job making his case the Andersson? Wouldn't even let him talk now, I'm going to say their white way, Anderson doing was doing was marking him for acting as though the real reason for the ukrainian situation was. We were concerned about corruption versus the more yes, which interpretation, which Anderson apparently would would back, which is. It was done for the election. There was done just again, abiden. I believe the abandon came really close to nailing this answer, but missed it, because I think Anderson's marking hit the target Because if you are claiming that the only reason I did it was because of corruption, Ukraine,

you're, not really being credible because, let's face it, it is a hundred percent obvious to everyone that at least one of the big reasons he was doing. It is cuz he's running for election against. If, if you don't acknowledge that one of the purposes of this in the presidents had can't read his mind, but we can say that we know what his interests are when running for election, it's obvious that one of the interest, is that he'd like to win an election, but here's where banning got a wrong and here's where so for every single pundit who's trying to do to defend the president seems to get it wrong is also the present. Job. It's perfectly allowed that he does something mostly to get elected if, by coincidence, is also one of the nation's biggest priorities protecting.

action making sure there's no undue interference. There was public info, Patient about it, you can't ignore public information about a potential conflict of the may be the next president of the United States. So you can speculate all you want about what the president was really thinking. It doesn't matter, it's just that relevant and absolutely doesn't matter if his secret of thoughts were all about himself doesn't matter as long as it's also his job. That's our system, our system is designed, so the people who can people can do things that are completely good for getting re elected so long as they're. Also the things that the president is supposed to do and following the priorities of the job, would she was so nobody has gotten this right yet and I don't know what's going on and actually kind of confused

It is there something about what I just said. The has some obvious counter to it. Does anybody have you seen you say this a number of times I've never seen anybody pushed back in any way that was even slightly sensible. Does anybody have pushed back on it? Give me an argument against lead that it was. It was, of course, good for his re election and all even accept that that was his primary motivation, doesnt matter, it was also his job and a top priority of his job, and he was acting on public information with an ally using a process is well established. For this somebody says I hear this daily. I haven't never done, but he said, as a defender of tv or new media,

her said it. I missed him saying that I did see him do a great piece, Tucker Little Grey, Pisan Elsie, which I too we learned yesterday. You should see that I was impressed by the writing. I assume eroded and it was really well written and performed. So the president has floated this idea. He says quoted some point: I'm going to sit down perhaps as a fireside chats alive television now read the transcript of the com, because people have to hear what you said when you read it is a stray call sprayed, meaning

nothing suspicious going on now, all what do all the experts say it doesn't matter. If your approach from her aunt, I trump all the experts, say, don't do that. It's a terrible idea. That's the worst idea ever. What do I say I like it? I like it. Here's was go to bed ready you and I believe, because we're normal use the normal way. People think is that other people think at least a little bit like you do. In other words, you think that, because you understand this, ukrainian phone call situation because you're

distinguished enough for you on this periscope, you probably follow the news you're, probably into politics here in this very thin band of people who are paying attention to something is technical, as the Ukraine thing in the beach with very few people are paying attention at a detailed level then it's things I just heard of. If the president goes on tv and reads his life letter as a defence. Obviously the whole context of would be here. Let me show you as clearly as I can see that there was no problem here and then less. Let's say he reads the letter. judge. Napoletano says that the letter and the context are completely in peaceful. It's obvious! When you see the letter or the when you see the transcript, not letter transmit transcript eating. I know its not technically a transcript, but some would say no that

Transcript is totally damning because, in the context of a you're saying, oh, you know you should be good to us. It would be good to you, whatever the wording is and that it is obvious that if he reads that he will be convicting himself, because the latter is so damning and other people say, while the letters pretty innocent y know what I read it on tv. I think I think maybe nobody says that actually accept Trump, here's my take the same thing that causes nobody to their causes. Less a ninety. Nine percent of public do not understand the details of this impeachment Ukraine. They won't change if he reason Tv, they still won't understand the details. They won't understand why it matters, they won't be able to connect the dots, but here's what they will do.

say to themselves if the president is reading it on television, it can't be bad. So here's what I swear I'll go to my grave, claiming that the spreads Isn't genius, and I know that I will. I will never be believed, so maybe on some level, if you gave the fears expressed her son he wouldn't the earlier one score than the top thirty per whenever I dunno maybe would, but when it comes to this stuff, man is here. you stand the human mind here, stands help people think like nobody ever did, and I guarantee that if he did a fireside chats here, the things that would come out of it number one everyone

would watch and he would bring in people who didn't care anything about watching the news, but they might watch the fireside chats does not exactly the news And so he would reach all the people were not paying attention. And he would reach them before the news gets to him because remember there now following the news that solution If the first thing you saw was the president getting on tv in saying people are really concerned about this. This function so much so that they want to impeach me I'll, tell you what I just said next to my fireplace and I'm just gonna, read you the transcript and you decide Now, when he Risa are people smart enough to make a decision based on the transcript and their detailed knowledge of the constant mission and impeachment laws now now, but they're not going to see a crime if you're, if you're a regular person

you hear me the transcript? Are you can hear any criminal activities? Are nothing I can hear anything. They even sounds a little bit wrong if you just a person you're not into politics at much injustices and so because he knows the people understand the scene, the show how they feel the fireside chat. Is brilliant because he can pull that off like nobody's ever pulled it off here's a video and was coming in to say that I am an apologist these in the dumbest people en Bloc.

because if you spend even just a little bit of time watching my content, you'll know that even in this conversation I said that the president and all of its people are totally blowing the Ukraine phone call persuasion. The whole context here is that so far they failed on one of the most important things are doing. I'm talking about the president's failure to persuade well so far on this Ukrainians stuff. Since the context This, as I like apology, apologist now telling them explaining how he could do better is just the description of talent really.

so I like that idea. New Gingrich says that policy made a huge strategic error by having the vote on the impeachment rules, not impeachment itself but just hold on the rules, because the vote went along party lines but even worse, to Democrats defected in over the Republicans and is generally considered good form the you don't move forward with impeachment unless you ve got some buying from the other side. That's really basic to the system is the thing the framers of the constitution worried about that it would just become a political process, so they tried to make it hard for it to be a political process. You have to have such bad ba.

here is that even the other team would say that's how about we get it and support our own president anymore were not there. So by having the vote, they have proven to the public that it's not legitimate. Because if it were even a little bit legitimate have we not seen that the Republicans are willing to break ranks with the present, have we not seen in Lhasa differently, Is that not all Republicans, but there are plenty of Republicans who are willing to publicly disagree with this president. A lot of different stuff And if you can get one Republican to say this is legitimate and indeed to Democrats have agreed. It's not you. Ve already lost.

so policy has already lost the politics of it and she lost heart, and I think Newt is why the smartest observers of any of the stuff- and I think you nailed it- I think she took whatever credibility she was trying to put together for this unjust, squander it all on their vote in, in the hope that the public would think something's happening as something good happen. It was the end of policies, credibility less. What that's what happened? I urge the president and his rally, I guess was last night- is using mercury to refrain this. Ukraine thing and I thought it was pretty clever. so he was talking about how easily he's he's been. Other competitors in the president said this quote:

Clinton, she was easy, meaning beating her was easy or bomber was easy. I have no idea what he meant by that the Bush dynasty was easy, but sleepy Joe I'm worried about. He asked so that I say to myself gee. I guess there's only way. One way, let's call up Ukraine, help, so he's actually marking the the media and his critics for imagining that after after is beaten, It is written the Bush dynasty, the Clinton dynasty he's wiped out Obama's legacy. He defeated ISIS, He's is somehow whipped up the entire republican Party to have his highest approval of of Republican, going from the lowest approval. He's done. All of that and oh and oh, by the way Moody's just came out with a new prediction

that he's gonna win in the landslide, so Moody's has a prediction that, based on economic criteria, forget about policies because they know predict, but based on economic criteria, the president's heading four slide no matter who he runs against no at her who he runs against. Moody is the best one of the best protectors of political stance says: it's gonna be a landslide. It's only, and that is only a question of how big and the president is is basically marking the people saying yeah I was so afraid of Joe Biden,

Then I had to get the Ukraine involved. There was the only way I could well now. I do think that one of his motives was, of course, the election, but I also think this pretty clever to point out that Joe is so inconsequential. He would not be worth it cheating for its, not maybe technically as accurate as it could be, but persuasion wisest very good. So,

that is to say one more point here was, but oh, I was well slowdown, so somebody's only of any of lead in which the president is introducing a new adjective war sleepy jail, calling him slow Joe any use had their Joe is just getting slower and slower, and I think to myself I think, there's more effective. Now on twitter people are giving me credit for saying you should be slow Joe. I think I probably did say that one boy, but I'm not taking credit for that.

as they use. In those words, I don't think there's any connection between missing in him say it in this case. I think it's just the rhymes with Joe and he does look Sloan sooner or later. That word was gonna come out by here's. The thing slow is really devastating. The there are too many sleepy is pretty devastating was slow is kind. Kill shot. The other ones are, would maybe wound him sleepy Heather that serve as a good attempt, but I think the word slow yeah. I think that removes all doubt, because only by use watching them is worrying to themselves. Here's the genius of it. They worry to themselves is getting slower even his foreigners are thinking to themselves. He I think,

slowing down. So the fact that slow fits so well with what people are already worrying about or thinking about that makes a devastating, but slow is also one of the worst insult. You could say short of actually saying somebody has a diagnosis, all mental disability he slow. Its is provocative because when here. That was the first one of the first things you think is wait a minute. Is this an ordinary and solid where you say? Oh, my competitor is dumb. We're just used to that doesn't mean much

my competitors dumb, or is he actually saying that tourism, organic mental or physical yoke? Part of his brain is now working up to scale at the moment any slow cause? That's pretty deep insult for somebody, so is provocative, is ambiguous? People can fill in it fill it in with what they they think it means in their own. My that's always good technic, and if it's, what they're already thinking is, devastating slow, Joe limit labour. This way when he was called sleepy jail. It was a non. There was a small chance. The Biden could have one.

If it becomes slow Joe, no chance that there would be the end of the game, in fact that in the name slow Joe would take Biden added the leadership on all the poles, I think I think he would drop like Iraq if slow Joe became his his name now sleepy it turns out the sleepy. Wasn't such a good and fed. because what do you watch Biden does he ever seem sleepy? No because he's in the candidate protection Program, where he doesn't do any events he actually for his age or even not for his age, but he seems like he has plenty of energy and he doesn't seem sleepy at all. So if you watch him and you think sleepy Joe, it doesn't fit cuz he's. I got a lot of energy on stage,

you just doesn't spend a lot of time on stage, so he could focus of its energy. But when you say slow Joe, you see that every time, but you can't get weight that off. Let's just always there much better. I will see what else we got here: mobile phone,

There was me: let's talk about the Democrats so giving given update, so we ve all heard that better dropped out. No, nobody was surprised. The battle dropped out of the race than the question is: who would get his all of his supporters wherever they go? I think data burrito said this was supporters. You want a job out if he had supporters, but you may have a few. So where do you think they would go way? Who who is the closest the battle? My best gases they just get distributed? Somehow and probably we're never gonna noticed, swear, agree with data on that, but there's also news on cobblers,

A couple hours is substantially cut her staff, but, unlike that, oh she's decided to stay in her release or numbers or in the four five percent whenever she is, but let me say this is any is already historical example. Help me in fact Jackie Lloyd fact, checkers jump to it you this, the fact you must check for me right now. Has anybody who is running for president ever substantially scaled back the size of their campaign for financial reasons and then go on to win Yeah, I would say when others the primary were or will be the general, but now, let's just say primary, so forget about the general election. Nobody ever scales back their campaign in the general, but in the primary is there any case of anybody ever scaling back a campaign and then going

to win? So I see a couple of maybe he's here and a bunch of nose. Well, ok, so it's like somebody, so Mccain, didn't became ever scale back his operation and then go on to win. The lot of people are saying became ok, so that would be a good fact check. I would love for the news to provide their context for us. My might take I'm coming is now. Let me remind you that I had a prediction over a year ago that she would be the the novelty and then go on to loosen the general election. Here's what I did not take into account and in my defence in my defence, would you agree. It was hard to see this common. I would never have gas

there. She would be the worst campaigner in the history of politicians that wasn't predictable and I was trying to think how did I get so fooled, because the brief, the very brief exposure to her didn't look incompetent at all, and I was thinking about that and the places that I've seen her the most before she was deeply into the campaign was, I would see her doing her senator job or should be setting at a desk And she and number one she looks better setting for some reason: she's, not a good standing president. I may her her posture is in good or something something about when she stands she's diminished, but when she's setting she is more powerful than she is also asking questions she's prepared in advance. and her domain that she has to navigate is very narrow, as more in hers strikes out.

She's more loyally and she can just get tough She only needs one mode. Tough lawyer Lee sit here, look tough and look and looks like a senator in that mode, which is very narrow. She nails it, and so I would see her in that moment. I say we'll look at her. In that mode she looks pre capable what I did wrong, because I didn't know anything about her, even though she's a senator from my state, they know anything about her. I thought to myself. Well, how likely is it that she could be so good at these settings? but then she would be terrible in another setting a dynamic economy. Obviously, honestly, never once did. I imagine that those brief sniffing snippets of her, where she looked very capable, were sleeping, but why were they misleading because assume

you take her out of her senator lawyer Mode Cross, examining where she's really good at tries to show personality and connect with people and do all the things that a charismatic politician would do, she has less of that they might have ever seen literally she's, the worst I've ever seen. Now. Let me take my lumps this is the worst. This is the worst prediction I've ever made. I don't think I've ever met a worse prediction that this now you might come up with some examples of where I made worse predictions, but I'll think. So I don't think so. This may be my worst one net. It also caused me to Sir replay my prediction record to see if I can figure

Why I'm sometimes right and sometimes raw and I'm trying to look for a battered? Yet who is our pattern to what the times I'm wrong versus the times are right? Here's what I think when the biggest variable is persuasion, I'm pretty good, so the biggest variable was trump, I think was persuasion, and so I got that right. With calm. The biggest variable was unknown to me until now, which is issued. She didn't skill. I never would have guessed. She could be a California senator and have no skill, and we who saw it look, let's be honest, did anybody see they're coming if you didn't already, nor it was hard to see coming so completely blade cited by that? So here's the thing when, when there are variables that

Are not strictly persuasion, I'm not so good. Let me give you an example were better in the case of these secrets, sonic weapon in the embassies. That was a case that to me, if you have a knowledge of mass hysteria and stuff, looked every bit like a psychological event, so I got that one right, I think maybe will never know exactly what happened in those embassies, but it does look more and more clear as time goes by then it was.

A secret sonic weapon, that was my first impression based on what I know about psychology, humans, persuasion, massive mass hysteria, Sarah, when when there was the vaguest shooter, I said before anybody that he wasn't ISIS even when ISIS claim credit for him. I still said yes, I know I says, doesn't typically claim credit for somebody was not theirs, but this time they are an outright noises connection. I did that again basin, basically F B. I profile that the way he was doing it was so on ISIS there. U is unlikely to be. Ices is right about that. Wherever wrong were is what I was trying to predict. Who trumped would pick for a vice president

Several because there's a there's, a persuasion element that, but it also has a lot to do. Varying the people and do they want the job things I wouldn't know about, and then a lot of details was state they might bring alone all ethics, so thou guessing vice president, is really hard very hard. I also has other candidates. I watched warrens speech in this latest. Whatever event all the Democrats, whereat excuse me, and do you see this when she talks she seems shaky and old and

bleeding bleating like a shape. She doesn't have leader voice. She ass wise, ass. We ve got to get some healthcare, you don't know we ve gotta, be bold and gag Isabel scare theirs. In her voice that betrays her age and doesn't sound literally and voices, are really important for leadership. You have to have a good voice. You don't have to ever a male voice, but you need a confident voice and she sounds She sells like an elderly woman whose complaining about prescription. they know me. She sells issues at the serious counter and she can't understand

and why she ordered one thing but they're giving or another thing, and that's not what her doktor saddened and she's get worked up about it. So between that and the fact that her policies are kind of whack, I know see her being the king Well, the Let me, let me hear back up to another point I want to say there is: rather than saying she won't be the candidate, let me say at the conditions upon which one could become the kids. Have you ever wondered why Joe Biden is leading in the polls when he so obviously the worst candidate in the field? Every ever wonder that now the answer they heard the news as well as name recognition that the public is in paying attention. They ve heard his name

other people's name. Maybe maybe, but don't you think you would meet somebody who supported by didn't, buy there. Ask you in the comments. Have you ever met one person in real life, not a television but a real life, one person who supports Biden to be present and as you thinking about it, consider your view of the world. Somebody said, yes, surprisingly, guy. I think most of you are having the same experience I did when I first realises, which was leading in all the poles and never met. I know you think I've seen anybody, it will make it even funnier. You wanted to be funnier. I've never seen anybody on Twitter Support Biden,

Have you have you seen anybody who is not part of the actual campaign or part of the Pandit class, but just people? just people who were commenting on Twitter You ever seen one personal support by under anybody. I think about it. What are the odds that he would be the leading candidate and you ve never seen one person who support them. that's an unusual to let when we throw out a conspiracy theory when you're a conspiracy theory. Let me say in advance: I'm not saying this is true. I'll just say is compatible with the facts. You can. You can put the conspiracy theory on it yourself. Let's say there is a deep state.

Let's say: there's a deep state you can fill in the names of who the head of the deep state, as you probably already has the same name, was say: there's a deep state and this little bit organised, what would be their ideal situation for president? Would it be, you put a judge. Would he be the ideal choice of the deep state. I'm going to say now, here's why people judge has his own opinions and I don't think he could be manipulated by the state so easily. What are you gonna do say? Hey people judge- if you know

lay along with us, will out you for being gay. Good luck, good luck, here's the conspiracy, theory and again I'm nothing. This is true. It is, however, compatible with the evidence, and the evidence would be. The Biden is the obvious choice of the deep state because they can control him. Remember that there was a thought that the Bush Junior wasn't a real

president and yelled that the dictator was really the present. Doesn't this remind you a little of that situation, where the people who are pushing for Joe Biden must be the money people right. There must be people with money must be people behind the stage it almost feels like somebody wants him to be president, because she's, not competent and they can control him. Maybe they have some compromise now, this, of course conspiracy would require that they can also control the poles. Do you think that's bustle? Do you think the deep state could control like all the Poles, because or they'll they'll say the same thing? Well, that that would be leap. I don't see. Other deep state could control all the poles.

but I certainly cannot understand why I don't mean binding supporters, they do seem kind of invisible setting, binding, can't win. I think you're scaring me I think Bernie keeps defying all the odds by staying alive and continuing to have the most vitality in his and his campaign. If Bernie Guess elected guest, nowadays I feel as though the real thing behind that would be that they ve given up so if either Bernie or Harris or Biden, if any of the top three actually get the nomination. I would take that as a sign that the Democrats have decided to take a buy here. You know a bye in sports means you don't really play a real game. You just say: okay, you won this timeless. Let's move on to the other part of the tournament, and I

they might be getting ready to just let Trump win, because first of all, the odds are day of a recession in the following four years are much better than our session before before election day, so if they can get if they can get a republican present to be in office when some bad stuff happens. Maybe that helps him from next time. But let's say the Democrats as a group, or at least whoever funds in the Austin Ass, a most influence. I say they decided to try to win. Who could they try to win with? Because the top three in the polls don't really have any any chance of winning the general? Let's take, but a judge who, I think is number four now, at least in some of the poles.

Good morning judge should he get nominated, give the president a good fight. What do you think giving people a judge could give President tribe a good fight in a jam. Election, I kind of do I kind of do. I think the first of all he's getting better and better and he's he's super smart and he's refunding this message. You would have Of course the gave out. Imagine if you will see that the vote is really clothes, except that except the Buddha Judge, siphoned off gay Republicans gets a guest mostly gay Republican, about there's a little over the edge. Now If you will get the african american vote so I don't see any these candidates beating trump, but

feelings, though put a judge, would get really close here. You could put up might Yang, I believe, has not shown us enough beyond his ears personality and his common sense and his you're, a signature, you'd so basically company, I think he doesn't have the means. The rounded enough. I don't see a making you don't. Let's talk about, we talked about the heiress, I I would say it would be a miracle for her to get nominated at this point just for fun. I've gotta keep my

original production in place, so you can see how wrong it is when she doesn't get there, but if the top three were to get out of the re, suddenly peoples are looking at her nose. Talk about Chelsea Gabert could tell see, put up a good fight, probably for on the way. Here's here's the problem and I'm gonna confess something that I feel actually bad about confessing. So here is my confession. You know how I've avoided talking about Dulcy Gabert end.

so many of you have been just bugging the heck out of me. Why don't you mention or why don't you mention her and I've been saying it's because she's low in the polls and not relevant, and I don't want to spend a lot of time about something. That's not are we relevant but her ball numbers are going up and now now we have to say: ok, let's put her in the conversation and obviously one of the reasons that Don't want to talk about her? Is that I don't want to accidentally make her present because she does have the goods and she would by far put up the best fight. As far as I can tell now. Maybe we learn more about her love, but at this point here's here's the argument for why she would be the strongest candidate

She's got a military background, so I can have all changed charismatic she's just pleasant. You know people like her she's, just like ability thing like crazy, which lot of the candidates don't have. They don't have like ability to. Let me ask when you hear it when he here, you're gonna be mad and maybe frightened people. This is this is a truth about human beings. People like to solve the last problem they like to solve whatever's what. the thing is bugging them at the moment, president Tramp President tramp has solved so many problems.

That you and moving down the priority list, because these kind of taking care of ISIS unease negotiating with China, the economy is screaming. That's our big stuff. Even the AIDS is the is being eradicated in this country. I mean big, big, big stuff. There was news today that the the oil crisis is actually the the death of going down for the first time recently, so the Trop administration is even making progress on opiates big, big stuff. If all the big stuff is taking care of so much so that were comes in after the present after drugs is gonna, be inheriting a good situation. Worse, They used our worry about once all the big stuff is taken care of personnel.

Division in the country? How people feel about the country how they feel about each other? How we feel as Americans are soul are our basic. our basic goodness to each other. Those are the things that people are obsessing about, because President Trump is by far the best president of all time and he solved so many problems hate to say it is true. He solved so many problems. He kindly doesn't need a second term. Having said that, so this is the the pendulum theory the pension.

The theory is that we spend so much time arguing about trumps personality that we all want a break from it. So it would. It was suggested even some Republicans, maybe many one- a break from the one thing that they're just so sick of which is talking about his product. patience is tweets. His personality was the candidate who is the least like trumps. Acerbic personality is burning, the least like trop. Now Bernie is red

screaming and angry about Warren, no she's, yellow screaming and angry about buying these slow. We don't need to worry about him about Buddha Judge, but a judge is serious and angry. Let's not really quite the antidote to drop Harris is sort of hard nosed prosecutor, doesnt connect with people It's not really the solution to transfer senility, you see what I'm gonna write assuming Yang is not not quite the public's choice. Tossing gabert becomes the one person in the right. Who personality wise feels like the solution? She feels like the antidote

for. However many years of trump dislike. Can we just get along? Can we just about? about a little bit of a low. Are you exhausted yet about we just be nice to each other for a while, the other we work it out. So that's the thing you don't see come and the thing you know see coming is people try to solve the thing? That's Buckingham and was bugging them is no longer ISIS. What's bugging is no longer the economy? What's bugging them is no longer a lot of stuff goes, Trump took care of it, but one is left. The fighting that the people getting beat up on the streets, the anti far the yell maker Then again the people were just new tired of it all the antidote is the person who is the most, unlike that, and that happens because it now she can also appeal awesome, Republicans, which most of the Democrats could not do. A demo.

the race will get all of the Democrats. I don't even think it matters what it is. You know whoever the Democrats run for the most part. They almost all of the Democrats. so the only person you should have to worry about somebody, you, you get a few from the other team. until she's, the only one who could do that now good to be a trump and in the in the general. I doubt it I don't think so, but she would be the strongest candidate now. Here's the question think about this. Who, who are the big money people giving money to or who were mostly giving money to the top three in the polls? who had the least chance appealing trump

and the people lower in the polls, dulcy and burn judge, probably have reopened put up the best fight. I think I'd say you that's what I think That's all I got today, I'm going to be doing a little travel this week. Cuz my buck lose your thing drops on Tuesday. You can work pre order it down which one to help me a lot. I had heard a lot of reports from people saying Amazon was cancelling their pre orders because it was of available is not unavailable. We made a lot of them. There's plenty of books and Amazon has all they need. So we don't know why Amazon has apparently cancelled the number of pre orders and probably some story to it, but there's plenty of supply, and if you were to buy this week, you would have

I need the most, because that's what kissing on the seller list. So I was really hoping that you do that everybody's going to be talking about it in the next week. I'll make sure that I should be on a few Fox news shows, I hope to be on the Greg Gutfeld Show. Look for me there and some other shows to me determined Albion, Foxen friends as well. So look really there and my periscopes this coming week might be unpredictable. So my my timing for the coming periscopes might be awful, but but are trying to do at least one a day, the purple somebody says. I don't believe this Scott, you said Tal C is unknown contender in the past winter pulling was one percent. I said she was not a content

At the moment, because everybody else is so bad that situation has changed so when the when the situation changes. Sometimes I change my mind. What do you do all right? That's all for now, and I will talk to you later.