Right so welcome back or actually hello and welcome to conspiracy theories. With more joanna the host of my own forecasts, because I am that amazing no, but today we are going to be. talking about the moon landings. Ah, this is one of my favorite conspiracy theories, mostly because the actual government is involved in it, whether it is fake or not yes, so I don't know I'm extremely for this, so let's get into it. So the origins of the whole conspiracy theories about the moon started because of the early and influential book about sub of a moon landing conspiracy. We never

went to the moon, America's thirty billion dollars window by they'll casing. It was self published in nineteen seventy six by him. Despite having no knowledge of Rockets or Tech Corp Technical writing, kissing Former- U S Navy officer with the bachelor votes in English was hired as a senior technical writer in nineteen. Fifty six by rocket dine the company that built the effort engines used on the southern. We rocket He then went serve as head of the technical publications unit at the company's proportion feel the board Tory until nineteen sixty three key this book made the allegations and overall just effectively began the discussion of the moon, landings being faked. The books clay, that the chance of a successful man standing on the moon was calculated to be point: zero, zero, one, seven percent, rating or percentage.

That low it is nearly impossible. So the fact that a court on quote did happen is is actually kind of questionable and well, despite chose motor Mon monitoring by the EU? sorry, it would have been easier for NASA to just fake the moon lending than to actually go there. And then in nineteen? the flat rate society accused nest taking the landings. Are you in that they were staged by Hollywood with Walt Disney sponsorship based on a script by Arthur, see, Clark and directed by Stanley Cool brick of these very influential, talented your arm and then you know ass time, went on with films in books and things like that mean polish media. The conspiracy theory ideas star two correlation and became popular to the point where they are today. I think

on twenty eight June. It is the most worthy Percentage has ever been ever been of people, and I believe that the moon landing was fake. So basically the moon lending conspiracy theories, we're gonna talk about today or just overall, even the ones they don't talk about. Claim that some or all of the elements of the APOLLO program in Associated MU landings were faked by NASA. If you dont know one now says, is basically the agency of the United States, where they are the they basically work with space, and things like that, so yeah, it was either faint by NASA, possibly with the aid of other organisations, the most

out of a claim which has psyche most famous one is that the six men landings. Ninety from nineteen sixty nine to nineteen, seventy two, where freight in that the twelve Palatia knots did not actually walking the moon, various groups and individuals have me claims, in the mid nineteen seventies that NASA another knowingly misled the public into believing the landings happened. They were they by manufacturing them bring with or destroying evidence, including photos, tapes radio and tv transmit transmissions, as well as rock samples and then killing certain people and key witnesses. So this You know if it is the theory, so it is kind could be a possibility Not necessarily I'm saying that it is true, so you can believe

If anything you want from where you are going to hear today, but I think it's very interesting that certain things here actually did happen. One of them is that they are not exactly how it goes, and I think I, Go over today, but basically NASA needed tapes and they couldn't afford them when they couldn't just by new ones, but they just recorded over the actual or ridge tapes for animal landing, which is absolutely just dumb. Why would you it was a part? Why would you do that? It was a part of not just american history, but human kind everybody else's history. So am I oughta not just certain things. that don't make sense this kind of like they probably just try to forget about a psychologist, pretended didn't happen, but its idea clearly happened. It was a thing that d created whether they created it,

and they sounded and not enough studio, or they took the tapes up there and they actually land there, but the the tapes were something that was there. You know what I mean. So, let's get into some of this Andy origins, the actual conspiracy theories of the moon, landing or white all started right, so big likely to be able to have done this. They must be claimed right, they must be motives, and one of those motives was the space race, the motivation for the? U S, to actually engaged the Soviet Union space raise, can be traced to the ongoing on ongoing cold war at the time, the landing. What if in was viewed as a national in technological accomplishment. If the? U S was, of course, let's any didn't

and there they said you know it would be a thing. This is seen as an accomplishment and demonstration of power that the country has. By going to the moon would actually be risk inexpensive and it was said by President John F Kennedy at that time in his nineteen sixty two speech and he said that the U S chose to go because it was hot saw already that idea that its difficulties there so filling plate hoax theory, the bunker in his book of bad astronomy, says that the Soviets with their own competing moon programme, an extensive intelligent network and formidable scientific community able to analyze analyze nights data would have come following the United States tried. If the United States tried to fit the moon lending,

Ashley since their own programme had failed. So if this was actually fate, the you, the Russians would have tried to prove that it was fake. I you know proving that approving the that it was a hoax would have been a huge propaganda, went for the Soviets dig deep, possibly could have led to the you know. M, taking the wind in the cold war, so conspiracies Bart Seeber responded to that claim. You know that if it was fake, they would have found out by saying that this We did not have the capability interactive spacecraft until that late. Until now, nineteen. Seventy two so immediately after which the last three or politicians were abruptly cancelled, cancelled, This is a very interesting claim, because this theory, the bunker. You know he says oh well. If it was faked, the Russians would have been in back of it, trying to prove that it will speak. Then Bart, see rural conspiracy respond

by saying that. Well, the Soviets did not have the capability to actually track if space, asked what they are not until late nineteen, seventy two. This was ten years after President John F Kennedy said that They were going to choose to go it alone, because it was heart because it was difficult. It is a very interesting claim, I think, and in the fact that three missions work council right after that leaves a lot of questions in now in the pool. So what are the actual here, what are the claims and well, they are lot of them- have to do with the photographs and the films from the act

the moon, landing or claimed moon landing on some other, or one of the claims is that the crosshairs from the actual events arm appeared to be behind certain objects which is in possible since The arm crosshairs are on the lines of the camera, which is impossible for the cosmos to appear to be behind things. this happened several times in up in a picture of like oh, what appears to be like a radio thing and then on the flag. There's also one happens that the crosshairs, also sometimes a rotating rotated Orient there, are in the wrong place the quality of the picture it is extremely high for the technology they had at the time in that they are. Some claim that there was no stars in any of the pictures and that

The moon landing was real than they would have actual starts, rather than just painting black for studio. They also go and talk about the angle and the color of the shadows and how they are inconsistent, which The journey that artificial lights were used on then the I'd better is identical backgrounds and the pictures which suggest that it was basically just opinion background and then one of the ones I think our Sure thing is that there is a sea, like the latter, see in one of the rocks, which could suggest that it was used as a problem as a studio prop, I think interesting just because it's kind of weird half the letter c on Iraq, but overall just kind of maybe pushing into far as in Nassau

did claim. It was like a picture just imperfection, like printing imperfection in they blame that, unlike our hair or something, but it still, I think it's They also talk about once again hotspots about the the lighting and how sometimes it's too bright any just seems like they faint them, and then they also go on to say well, coup filmed Nile or Neil Armstrong and down, The acid claims that it was the lunar module while step is as was still steps on short deployed the merger Equipment storage assembly. On the side of the lunar module and which housed the tv camera and all that for four six hundred million people on earth to watch. So I think the whole idea is a very, very interesting.

but it seems as if NASA was just trying to find the same excuse for for everything that they set. The theory also goes to talk about, violent saying that the austrian knots could not have survived this trip because of the exposure to radiation from the Van Alan radiation belt. Electric Ambien radiation it is, could have caused radiation poisoning and health threat from cosmic raised there, sometimes versus hope, conspiracies, have suggested the starfish prime. It's like it was on a high altitude nuclear test in Non July from July,

Nineteen sixty two us around that time, too was a failed attempt to disrupt the van now votes. So they're saying that the reason that this nuclear test happen was to try to reach roughed those belts that could possibly make it easier for them dandy. The environment based on environment? Still the film the cameras would have been fogged by the radiation. In the cameras are used. Clear meals, clear enough, the short on tv show their stating that if this Are actually on the moon radiation? We have cost the cameras to forego ninety. After I say, fogged up the moons surfers during that The time is also so hot that the camera film would have melted. Ah so I mean that's kind of reaching if he asks me, but I guess it. Yes

it's a claim. So we also say that the APOLLO sixteen crew could not have survived a big solar flair ironing out when they were on their way to the moon. But I did searched this. and there was no large flare occurred or that was occurring during the flight of oppose sixteen. They were solid, flares in August nineteen. Seventy two! After about sixteen returned to earth and before the flight of APOLLO seventeen on they also claimed based on the environment that thief like place on the surfers surface by the austrian knots was fluttering and moving in that this is impossible, since there is no wind on the moon

there is also they also talk about footprints in the moon dust that are just well preserved, despite the lack of most moisture, because if it's just ass tender, some most you're in it. What has just been like a regular step right? So then this the footprints. Are we really unexpectedly well preserved? the alleged moon landings ire either? you sound stage or they were found outside in a remote desert with the Austrian adds either using harness, are slow motion the tiger feed to make it look like they were on the moon. So you know they just they based said that the whole thing there isn't enough so slow is because they just made the thumb slower, or they took a lot of pictures and Andy you. Basically,

because no motion works. They also want to talk about mechanical issues. They said TAT the you're modules made no blast craters or any sign of dust scattered on which I think it's a very interesting What's it called sign or, like idea, does

say that the second stage of the launch rocket in the mood to learn that the lunar module assented also made no visible, visible flame. When you went up so I think that's very interesting out. There is a lot of things to look into and I think there is a lot of valid claims, but you know I don't know. I don't know what to what to say. I think definitely it's a thing that a lot more people are believing, so it could possibly be an actual thing. I think we are in actual thing that people into and that could make the government, possibly just you know, say that it was fake, but I dont think that will happen, never that they would agree with that. I think

you're gonna, be stuck in just saying that it is, I think another one of the biggest claims is that there's missing data blue. Prince and signs in development drawings of the machines involved are missing. appalling Levin data tapes containing Tell. Elementary is its basically like it's out of me, communications process by which measurements and other data are collected, remote or inaccessible points so basically, and the like and high quality video or the actual high quality. Video that existed is missing and the doktor

video of the first move. Walk are also missing. I Think how does all this important pieces of just history just go? Miss that mean they contain the original highest quality videos from Paul, eleven landing it is not there, it doesn't make sense down. There is also the you know: the blueprints just of, The sadder be rocket and lunar module on the lunar? Roving Vigo asked she hated and associated equipment from the oven. missions are also missing. I think. I think it's very interesting that all this stuff is just not there so those things that could have been such potential pieces.

history, not necessarily like to prove it. The moon, shining, Austria, but it just They're, all you lose. Those things I have I read once I dont know if it's true, but it did read that there are dangers record. over certain tapes. Recorded over the actual footed and its Why do you do that? I don't know. I think there questions to ask. So NASA's response to all of this, is clear letter so in June. One. Seventy seven NASA issued a fact. She responding to recent claims that Your parliament landings had been hoped. The vaccine is particular particularly blunt and rigour That's the idea of making the moon landings to prepare There is an outlandish now so refers to the rocks in particles collected from the moon. S been evidence of the programmes programmes.

Legitimacy as they claim that these I could not have been formed during any conditions on earth. Nasa also notes that all the operations and faces of the Paul programme were closely followed and, under the scrutiny of the news, media from lift off to splashed out NASA response to Bill casings book we never went to the moon by identifying of one of his claims of fraud regarding the lack of crater left on the moons surface by landing on the? lunar module and refuting with facts, about the saw Inko his cohesive nature of the arm, surface of the moon and then it was reassured again on fair brew February, fourteenth too. That was in one the day before television broadcasts of conspiracy Did we land on the moon? Where are they?

a canary, reinvigorated. The public's, interesting conspiracy theories Possibility that the moon landings where faked way has provoked NASA to once again defend its name. Ah, I think there is a lot of questions left to us in every single aspect of this idea in whole thing of conspiracy theories of the moon, ending it has motives and, If there is motives, it shows, There must be a reason for them to actually do that, rather than just I this for fun but there is also a lot of hard evidence. The NASA provides the picture and then Advances and offences of every single part of a theory or things like that whether it is true or not, that is free to decide, and You want to know more about this place.

do research on it. It is extremely interesting- and I think going along with the part gas, and they look in a picture that same time, origin, disregarding my podcast, but actually just going in and watch videos on looking at pictures. It is a very interesting thing. I don't have to go over it, but there is a theory about a coke or bottle on the moon, seen by a shrill lady of the original light feed, not the one being delayed, but yes other than that. I hope you enjoyed hang out with me. I know I enjoyed hang out with you I'll see you guys on the next podcast have beautiful day by.