In our clinical trials, the nations highest court facing historic change, as judge ketanji brown jackson is set to be confirmed by the senate. This afternoon. Forty seven gop senators, including our income guest, will vote against her confirmation. Tim Scott will explain why senator I want your comments on why you are not voting for the judge and want you to react to joy reid. She said not surprised by anything that TIM Scott says he left lindsey. Graham dog walk him after pretending to work, and we will go along with lindsey grahams barking, dog racism against judge jackson, because hes tim scott senator good morning to all yall.

What is offensive about what joy is saying is that a black man cannot think for himself. I have to follow someone else that is most ridiculous thing. Ive heard it reinforcing liberal approach to minorities who will not fall in line and do what they tell us to do. There are millions of americans who happen to be black and want to think for themselves and will think for themselves. Power of the liberal elite wants to attack us, like liberal dogs. They do not want anyone standing up opposed to what we are doing leading our country in the wrong direction. It is vile and offensive. Stop allowing the liberal media to push stories by their host that want one thing: progressive, liberal policies that make it harder for african americans not easier. That is why president bidens

numbers in black and hispanic community are going down down down. We can see with our own eyes what policies and principles of the left are doing to us, not for us. Cuhelp bring people like wesley hunt and John James behind me bring the calvary by going to timscott dot com. I need your support to defend against thisack of common sense. I hate to step on you. You are right offered amendment to democrat to get police reform done. They decided not to go through that. Why are you not voting for the judge for supreme court? Its a very simple answer: I did not vote for her for a lower court because I believe her judicial philosophy is inconsistent with the best instance of our judiciary. Can you imagine me coming back and changing my mind on the most

important seat in the judiciary, the supreme court of the united states? It is not bidens supreme court, it is americas supreme court. The number of her cases that have been overturned only reinforces the fact that this requires a deeper look and the deeper. I look the more I realize her judicial philosophy is an thet cal to mine. It is a simple answer. Senator you and Lindsey graham have said they will not vote for her. They are voting. No. This is democrat for a Democrat on supreme court. How progressive is she compared to where the court is now? Should we be concerned? I think if you are concerned about activist judges, you should be concerned. If you are concerned about someone who uses their position to reinforce a progressive agenda, we should be concerned. Those are the issues that most concern me about this appointment. She is a nice person.

She is well educated. Her judicial philosophy, not her who she is her ideology, is what we should focus on. She represents herself incredibly well. She was reasonable in our conversation together at the end of the day, im not looking for someone to have a coca cola with im. Looking for someone who will rule in favor of americas future- and I dont see that in this judge, senator you saw core booker get emotional. Do you have similar emotion? I know you are not going to vote for her. Do you think this is groundbreaking for you and the african american community? Well, there is no doubt the fact of the matter is. She would be the first african american female on the court.

It does speak volumes to americas, progress and evolution were seeing in the country, and we should all celebrate that stop and pause for a minute and ask ourselves when then Senator Biden had a chance to make sure that the court continued to have minority representation? What did he do? He said to clarence Thomas no way? No, how not on my watch. He did everything in his power to make sure that the court he now is concerned about diversity would have been completely white. That hypocrisy has to be brought to the surface so that we understand when theyre talking about the future or just talking about politics. They are talking politics, they are talking elite progressives, not talking about the literal future of america and diversifying of our court. They are talking about embedding in concrete a progressive view of what america should be versus

the view of conserveing the core principles that undergerting american prosperity and human flourishing the world over because of the united states of america. Senator such a good point, your colleague, mitt romney, you started off by saying you could not vote for her for the supreme court. If you didnt vote for her at lower court, he didnt vote at lower court, but he is now. Why did he decide to do that? Have you talked to him lawrence? I have not spoken to mitt romney about his decision. I cant imagine why he made reversal. He has way. I look. This is simple question. If I thought she was not qualified at lower level, it is really hard for me to come to the decision. I think history plays a role in so many peoples decisions, and I understand that I cannot allow that to be my decision for the highest court

and the most important democracy in all of the world. It is just too important consistent view senator how about the gamecocks, the womens basketball team shout out to the lady gamecocks dawn staley has done a fabulous job, looking forward to see her go for another ten in a row. That is my hope for the lady gamecocks catch up to you. That is what we say in. Thank you for correcting that pastor got off the plane and saw that on a billboard and said this town really needs me. My gosh.