Every business owner asked themselves this question. How can I make my business more productive at four purposely built to help answer this by offering ways to help electrify your foot bundle your billing and streamline the whole thing introducing a productivity accelerator for your business visit for pro dot com

oh, my goodness. What a great episode on this episode Stew discovers that he has a nephew and he adopts his six year old nephew and the laughs ensue, and then we go on a trip to Disneyland and it's a very special podcast today. Actually we we start with President Biden and do we agree? Do we see it? The same way or you're kind of you're a little low, so I don't know if I'm going as far as you are as far as what they're attempting to do, I know, but I think I'm with you that the most innocuous description of these moments in this speech- I I can't bike yeah- I can't buy that yeah, so there's an interesting paradigm that is being set up, that we are at war and brace yourself for a very long war, and I explain it right off the top. Then we also have Carol Roth with us to talk to us a little bit about what is happening with our economy and that new special tax that twenty per cent tax of unrealized money. All that is great. I can't wait yeah when you really understand what that is. It's not just a tax. It is an.

I am american and we've just destroyed, what's left of any economy or free market, also unconstitutional. If you wanted to add that I dunno, if anyone cares about that anymore, but like all on today's podcast, the only so let's start with this wonderful, beautiful full speech that the President and gave yesterday First of all, our day before he was in, he was in Poland, and it was remarkable that you could compare it to an it. Has been Pope John Paul and His speeches to Poland and and joy of K and Ronald Reagan. Pan

I think it's true. I mean he really here we went right where everybody who is involved in this, right! Where they live, cut five! Please and the security and national security for the survive ability of the planet. We all need to move as quickly as possible, clean renewable energy and work together to help get that done. That's great! That's great, oh That's right. He also was talking about Ukraine and NATO and what was happening with Ukraine, and I think what It is what he ended it with now. Listen how awkward, This is usually you leave on a happy note. President Biden decided not to hear it. Is Ukraine, never be a victory for Russia, for free people refused

the live in a world of hopelessness and darkness, we will have a different future, a brighter future rooted in democracy in principle, open light. Decency and dignity and freedom of possibilities, for God's sake, this man cannot remain power. okay, alright. So that was weird and not in the speech. I don't you can trust that or not. But let me rig refresh your memory on the Gorbachev Reagan speech. While he was in Berlin. Mr Gorbachev tear down this wall that went back and forth with the state department. He said, I'm saying it: no you're, not! Yes! I am no, I'm not wait a minute. It's like that, bugs bunny routine. He it was taken out. each three times it was not in the teleprompter and he knew right where he where he wanted to say it and he wrote it. It was him, Mr Gorbachev, tear down this wall now that

not a Mr Gorbachev somebody I used throw you quite different, but state Apartment was against that because it would cause all kinds of problems they thought and it did. It did unfortunately, for the Soviet Union, not for the rest of the free world. It freed the world now put me now this whisk It seems like an ad lib because you wouldn't have put that at the end of the speech. But mister mental agility. and find a place to put that into the speech, so just at the end, these, like the whole time, don't think about this. it was an ad lib. All time he's thinking this guy can't be in power. This guy can't, in power- and he can find a place to put it in the speech, so we just adds it to the end now. Is it passed

bull that that's what he really thinks well, let's remember, Joe Biden is known for leading his staff, he's known for whatever the policy is they're working on to remember the homo, actual marriage thing we know that the White House was working on a draft to announce the you know. They were for gay marriage, yadda yadda and Joe Biden just came out on some weekend and when I'm always for gay marriage that's where we need to be The White House was a little pissed. Remember that oh yeah he's done, that kind of thing several times where he leads the staff he leads he just blurt set out in this camp. What was began around that whole situation, where he said a minor incursion might not be that big of a deal right This same right of moment right, so if he

thinking this and this is an ad lib. What Is that mean now Give you some little. Let me give you some additional, so there a part ability he's completely senile and that's a discussion we should have, because if he is that out of control. He should now be the president of the United States? I honestly don't think that's it. I think he has a different point of view and let me make let me make the case here. First this strengthens Putin, whore, both horrible idea, horrible idea, but also in his framing is also framing this as democracy versus autocracy. This is the theme? of his of his Did you hear his nightmare year? This is one of the things that stood out to me in his first speech from the web.

of the Senate when he told All of the people sitting there in in the capital that you were the people that made the world a better place that they were the people. got us through this pandemic, not the american people, the people, in power, and then he twice maybe three times questioned democracy. the versus autocracy so he's going for a bigger thing, he's not going for the the Putin getting out of Ukraine he's gone, for something much much bigger. Case in point. Did you see the weird tweet that came out from his office he's not on Twitter. I don't even think he knows how to work the phone he's like phone doesn't have grindr there on the side, where the my guess who give me give me eight one thousand. What

so I don't think he knows how to work in kind of any kind of fun I'm sitting on the pot. You know tweeting, listen to this you're in engaged in a new great battle for freedom. Battle between democracy and autocracy between liberty and repression there battle will not be one in days or months, either way. need to steel ourselves for the long fight ahead, wow wow, what What does he see coming now. Blinkin came out this weekend and said: that's not what he means. I suggest. It is because what The other problem? What was, the other thing that he said this weekend, while he was over there. He

several things that they had to walk back, but they were all in exactly the same direction: lead play, cut thirteen ukrainian people. You people have a lot of backbone of guts, I'm sure you're, observing it. And I don't mean just a military which we've been training since back when they Russia moved into and in the South EAST South EAST Ukraine. but also the average citizen, looking Stepping up having stepping up and you're going to see when you're there, and you can just tell him You'Ve- been there they're going to say you're going to see women people stand and in front of damn tank. It's the I'm not leaving I'm holding my ground

incredible. Alright, okay, take a lot of inspiration from us and you know just died. The secretary of state used as an expression. She said we are the essential nation, the sound, like a bit of a hyperbole, but the truth of the matter is You are the organizing principle around which the rest of the world is the free world is moving. Okay, stop there's a couple of those three things here. First of all, let me to take the the obvious kind of essential one going to his mind state that woman that just died would be Madeleine Albright, but he recall her name that woman who just died K. So that makes a case he doesn't know what the hell he's, even talking about which is a conversation we should have, but let's, let's look at This, as maybe he does know what he's talking about. He just has no filter on it

when he suggested that the troops that were stationed in Poland, that they would witness bravery of the american people when you're there. he immediately followed it with, and a lot of you have already been there, but that doesn't- sense. Now I dismiss this as an old man gaff when I first heard this, but this was one of the first big ass they had to walk back Why dismiss this as just our well it's just an old man, gaff well, doesn't that fit with. He has to be removed and in the vote were old. Look to you, the soldier, you, Are the organizing principle the world is being built around. those fit. So I like to give the president the benefit of the doubt, but if I'm on the opposing side, if I

advising Putin, because this is what they have to do. What This president, even saying is he is incompetent. Or is he revealing what they? What their real intention is? I would say if I were Advising russia- I don't- I don't know, Mr President, but I think that there is a pattern here, just look at what his twitter feed said again it doesn't mean that he's not senile. But my is to you is he's ravine he's revealing the things that are coming. and how do we know well those were all crazy off the cuff clips but they're, all consistent for a bigger longer war,.

Alright, maybe he's just that himself, but nobody else is, then why would the White House tweet we are? engaged in a new great battle for freedom, a battle between democracy and a autocracy sea between liberty and repression. This battle will not be won in days or months eater either. We need to steal ourselves for the long fight ahead? That's coming approved from the White House yesterday. Where can we better decide a couple of things? First of all is our president competent if he, making these kinds of mistakes. they truly are mistakes, because he just is not a gas machine. This is very dangerous situation. If he's not competent,

should not be the president of the United States, and I know what that means. That means a world run by Come Kamala Harris COD. help us all, but it least she would not make any sense and wouldn't be doing this stuff. Or are we being prepped for a war? It seems to me. When Putin talking about. His first phase is done. And everybody's looking for negotiations and Odin seems to be looking for a way out of this. This is exactly the wrong kind of language to use. Where is the White House saying it looks like Putin, may be done with the first phase, as they said, and it looks good. Maybe we have.

Maybe we have a bright future with a v. For a quick war that It's come to an end where that encouragement. Instead, we need to steal ourselves for the long fight ahead. I think this administration wants war. I think they want a fight, They just, don't want to release it yet, but that's they're talking about in the White House and he's just blowing the cover, that's my theory. but it's either that or the guy is totally incompetent, and saying things that are very dangerous that are not connected to any reality in the White House.

that should stop. This is the best of the Glenn Beck program, and we really want to thank you for listening. I am surrounded by family of people who have their life back because of relief factor, I'm one of them. I was in pain and got to the went to where I just couldn't. Do it anymore, I I feel, like you know, I just I can't get up another day and we have our life back because of relief factor, not a tv commercial. It's a it's a group of real people with real results that had real pain. Try. It yourself really factor this guy.

When he started completely bald. Look at him now he doesn't do anything for your hair, but it will help you get out of pain. Give it a shot. Try the three week Quickstart, doesn't work, move on, but we're here to tell you. It works relief fact you're not come here a rough. I got a lot to talk to you today that I want to start with this twenty percent minimum in come tax on people that make over one hundred million dollars a year. I Carol hi Glenn either? It is not even an income tax, it's a quota for wealth tat, which is an idea that is so bad that nine countries in Europe abandoned its that that might have imagined and economic policy being so bad that Europe, like were soon attendant. Didn't France try this recently in it like all of them

Wealthy people moved away yeah this. The statistics were that between two thousand and two thousand Twelve forty two thousand millionaires and up act had a mass exodus from France. I basically drew all drove all the people out, because you know, if you have those means capital is. Well when you're not going to stick around when you have other options, and that was the catalyst with them being another one of the countries that go they never. Maybe this doesn't such a great idea of an even though there is a long tail on at their still still collecting a little bit of a rubber do that it was grandfathered in everything around twenty fourteen. They said we work on no to me about so nobody has tried to move that number down. I'm concerned always when they say it's only in these people at axis never do that. In America,

men anything that is targeted at the billion errors is really a ruse for them to get you to agree to it, because all why? Why would I care for it you're the fact, the billionaire, but really it's going to? U impact you, and that is the rule think about your this being tied to individual income. Usually, if you are in an upper tier individual, you have very sophisticated tax work. You probably have trusts. You may have shell corporations, so I would imagine, there's probably going to be some loopholes to go. Well, it's not really a individual income. It's a family trust readers so some way around it, but now a great you ask well we'll put it in on this, so we're going to move it down we're going to move it down, remember. The Biden administration wants to hire eighty seven thousand new iris ages. Been that's not we're going after the billion hours that's for coming after yet so

They not only want to do that. They got the funding to do that in this in this last bill, so that the dangerous thing that is in this wealth tax is a. tax on unrealized gains. This insanity absolute insanity. Can you explain it yes unrealized gains? I would say it is not really a thing we shouldn't normalize. It is really a ruse to have another lawful seizure of personal property. So let's say: you buy a house and you bought it for one hundred thousand dollars and then in your neighborhood, another house sells for two hundred thousand dollars there say? Well, you know you hate all the house are they're worth about the same, so you have an unrealized gain of one hundred thousand dollars. You were going to tax you on that so, what do you do? You have to sell your house to pay the taxes,

that analogy than a move it to the stock market lotion These individuals who are wealthy are so on papers because they own big pieces of companies which the market has valued at higher and higher levels, and so on, paper. Their ownership looks bit, but if all the sudden they have to have sell stakes in their companies that have to the entire market it's just it basically nationalizes or socialized as companies. It affects all of us through pension. And for one k, because supply and demand in the market. If you have these big people who are selling massive shares of their company is going to drive the prices down for everybody. It's an order. Total after its unconstitutional and is one of those things we have to push back because, like you said, if you just say well, it's just for the Eland Mosques and jump days, those in the world, your excepting a breach. In principle, and then the game so

it won't be job. I mean this is the way you know. There are the great reset says by twenty thirty now think of this, you have to get people out of ownership in what of eight years, eight years There's two elections. You have to get people to own. Nothing this is a way to do it. If you have unrealized taxes and an unrealized income, meaning your house think out how much your house is worth today, if you wanted to sell it, no saying that tomorrow it could go down and get a hold of you lose money. If you didn't sell it, you just don't know where the when the bottom is of a market But if you have to sell your house to be able to pay the taxes for income, that you didn't have. It was all on paper

you don't own houses, you put a lot of people out of their house yeah and all based, science theory. Unfortunately, we already have something. That's kind of close to that and property taxes would just double and triple up on it, but you know it it's anything you own, I mean. Maybe your grandparents gave you an heirloom, a painting. That's now worth a bunch of money like what are you supposed to do? Oh, it's worth a million dollars. Now I have to sell this family heirloom, so I can pay taxes for what amuses the most an american concept that you could this is what caused Robinhood. I mean this the kind of thing that going on in the adventures of Robin Hood, that with the sheriff was doing heat. They were doing unreasonable taxes and then giving it to the state giving it to the king? all of the people that were in with king, I mean we are stars to live in Nottingham yeah. Ok,

The thing that, when need to anyone, talks about it in unrealized gain or this fear, radical all gain and value they never talk about the unrealized lost. It is all right out, you know, something's gone down. Are you gonna give it back to me? Of course it never looks like that. Nobody, nobody ever wants to socialize the losses. They only want to participate in the gains a one way street and again they use this. What happened by the way in Venezuela used this kind of you'll language and you're the easily elite. They own everything. Let us take it over. Let us take for business and Europe in a share in it and obvious we, they went from these different biggest economy in the world decades ago to state that we all know that their end to day. This is the way an and it is so dangerous. I cannot even even make an emphatic and it is it's truly amazing that the President is suggesting this and putting this in, and the

It is something that the Democrats would have been against. You know ten years ago. The it shows how far left President, and this administration really has gone and the Democrats have gone. absolutely, and even now me, somebody like JANET Yellen, has been an absolute disaster, it's sad and now at the Treasury to win this. This idea first circled around she was going out and saying how great it was and trying to populate it, and it got a lot of pushback and it kind of died for a little while and now you know holes, im down so here it is again. Maybe we can distract everybody from me to all the other economic disasters and inflation and high gas prices by saying that we're going to go after the greedy billionaires and hopefully

and we will get that same kind of pushback back and say this is unreasonable, it's unconstitutional and it just cannot have it all right to Louis switch topics. You wrote a great article. I think this came out last week. E S g advocates are killing the american dream. Can you just go in the middle of it. You talk about sixty minute piece where they're talking about or talking to, the CEO of Tri, Con residential and this is happening everywhere and nobody's really paying attention to it and it is so dangerous. Is this infuriating, because these global elites, who are pushing a e s g, saying well we're doing this for the the good of society and that s that social, We want to make things you're good for everybody, so these

in banks and financial institutions who have bought into this idea that they're going to make decisions that are good for society are now funding companies that are competing with you to buy houses and we are underfunded or excuse me. We are under built in this country by about four to five million houses, depending on who you ask, and so already a supply demand imbalance, but now you've got these these big financial assets. dishes that are backing these folks, like the ones that are quoted in the sixty. He's an interview there, as well as others that are publicly traded that are going in and buying thirty thousand forty. I was an eighty thousand. I saw one of them a we'll homes and their going hand with all cash offers. There often waving inspection, sometimes our aid and looking at the houses, and so from a buyer's perspective. You know: here's here's, we know it's going to close, it's all cash. We don't have to go through any brain damage and they're. Just

selling their houses to these corporations were then renting it back to people who now can no longer afford a house have been priced out of the house, and this goes back to that whole rate. Reset played you will all nothing and I will be happy except we know you won't be happy, because only home, is part of that wealth creation and part of that American Dream Sue Carroll with two people, Do you think what is the trip wire that wakes people up? The average person cause the which person still, I think is saying this kind of stuff won't happen it. You know it's. It's Germany, in the nineteen, thirty Okay, yes, but it's not going to get any worse than this, and if you, keep moving the line too take it worse than this look look how far we have come in ten years, when where. Where is the pain point for the american people,

excellent question. I know you spend a lot of time on social media, glad that ever seen the distracted boyfriend meme, where you have the guy who's look. had a girl s, friends, kind of like looking at what was going on very much everybody's looking at stuff that isn't important, You understand that really important is not looking at you going. Why are you paying attention to me at the they're just so much nonsense out there that people are highly focused on then I think you do such an incredible. service to the average American. Bringing up these issues that nobody's talking about usually when the trip happens is after it's too late. You know after it's affected, so many people that you hit that tipping point that you read if the point of no return, they go? Oh gosh, I guess we should have paid or paid attention to this earlier and

that that is the unfortunate bedding and his white so important to have these conversations and for individuals to help spread the word in this. This has to be a movement you have to be out talking to your friends and your family. and your neighbors about these things, because it's real getting out of control. Did you see it? Is this True that the FED came out and said the next four increases on interest rates will be. Fifty basis points each a rise of of two percent I certainly saw that they were entertaining it as a possibility, sir. I don't think that it was one hundred percent set in stone, but they are we're more open to that which, basically, as we are really behind, occur, that we need to play a catch up which, as we have talked about, has implications, because that is how much? How much is the increase for each point

just for our federal budget basically, it is tied into pushes up the ten he also the tenure. Already trading up. It was it like two and a half per cent for at least a day last week, and that affects when need one government issues bonds you how much it has to give in terms of interest so when they do that when they do that financing, and so this isn't on either the current financing, which is already but on future financing every one percent is three: hundred billion dollars and additional taxes. Are it's not some. That's going to happen immediately, but again, if you go back to that C b, o projection, this was going to happen. You know by twenty thirty two: it was going to be another three hundred billion. They were expect. in the tenure. You ought to be at two point: one percent by two thousand twenty five and we're already at two point: five to believable been another six hundred billion dollars that our government would have to pay just in interest.

Crippling crippling the best of the Glenn Beck program with us. Now He is the representative from the State of Utah Welcome to the programme, Mr Chris Stuart. How are you doing? be with you, as always. I sense a little sarcasm so once you know, I'm gonna keep my shower catchment check his book Andrew. I don't swore. I don't know what you're talking about Chris is the author of the final fight for freedom. If you haven't read that book, yet you should, it is the perfect book for people that you're trying to explain what is happening and what is coming because

takes you from a fictional, the scenario that everybody can understand and then he breaks it down and says: yeah, This is what's really happening Fantastic book, the final fight for freedom, so Chris couple of things. First, let's start with the president this weekend, Everybody is talking about what he said that you know. Basically, sovereignty go over and show potent, maybe we'll do it I mean that's what that's one way to interpret it. and people are try to make it look like he's just incompetent. I have another theory, This is what he really feels he's he also you could blow often I did at first blow off his statement to the troops and you'll see that soon, when you at two when you get to Ukraine they blew that office. Just a you know: gas, Then the White House, yesterday all

oh came out with a tweet that I found really quite frightening, and that is weird engaged a in a great battle for freedom, a battle between democracy and autocracy between liberty and repression there battle will not be won in days or months. We to steal ourselves, for the long fight ahead it going on Chris yeah there's a lot to unpack there Glenn. You know statement? There's no question that that's the way he feels I'm talking about Biden, saying that you know we've got to get get rid of Vladimir Putin. There's no question in my mind. I do- and I think he's made that clear through the last several months that that's exactly what he would like to see happen and I think we need to ask ourselves a couple. Questions and first I do think about him- Putin is stronger now at home. Then he was three days ago. I promise you that two years No doubt about it and

the irony of us claiming end- and you know this five year- we went through or Russia was here during with our elections with our own democratic process. How do you think the people in Russia feel now and so they're going to rally around him. It makes him stronger in the second thing is: do you think this makes it more or less likely that will be able to exit Ukraine without this getting worse will. This case is certainly makes it less likely that that's how come when glad him. Your Putin feels like he's. Fighting literally forgets light, so Chris I heard this morning that Vladimir Putin is saying phase. One is over and it looked like a child, That's for him to. You, know, save face and kind of retreat and just take the done. our region if that would be except double to the Ukrainians, which I doubt, but it it looked like, he was for the first time not talking about advancing. So

are we closer to peace or closer to war after this weekend? I mean who knows clan? I mean honestly, I could give you my opinion on that and I will, but you would have to copy out of it to Sansa. The fog of war is sick and it's like the great saying everyone's got a plan. So you get punched in the face. and that's what we're dealing with here, but whether it's less likely or more likely is unknown. I think it's certainly less likely that we have an exit or provide blender with some kind of off ramp now than it was three days ago, but that has to be our goal. We have to try to set up some framework, for he can claim some kind of victory and whether it's they give up the denial. the region in the east, from probably Crimea? And, as you said, books Alinsky has been a as indicated she'd be open to that. But the alternative is just a catastrophe, and that is we kill. Who knows how many craning pupil and approach your four year after year after year? Now it will look like Syria, seven, eight ten. your friend. Now, if you

age and a proxy war between Lattimer, and the United States and Ukrainians are in the middle of that. by the way, if you think the Gladimir Putin has told what about President she? What about What was in Iraq? What about? Ah you know North Korea, where do we draw the line? Well, that's when it came from pal. That's why it was scary to me that we are. We are saying outright. This is not a gaffe. This is from the. The White House and Potest Twitter feed a battle between democracy and a talk receive between liberty and repression, this battle Bobby one in days or months either we need to steal ourselves for the long fight ahead. When you are making it the battle not for Ukraine, but half the world and the world is already dividing itself now because of Ukraine. What are we really doing? What are we fighting

we preparing to separate ourselves from half the world? and I never think of the top. Your programmers listening to you and I think you leave that out, really well and very thoughtfully, and once If you make this a battle between freedom and a talker, sheer freedom and tyranny, doubt why only de trained. Why only Russia? What, again, one eye hasn t, if you like it, if you want to see a talkers, if you once you oppression, go to the western regions in China as I've been able to do, and look at me of muslim leaders who are in essentially concentration camps and by the way, I think goods that are are basically says here are more than happy to purchase a and and where do you draw the line, including by the way gland with some of our allies, some of our allies are not pillars of virtue. We align ourselves because we must in order to do it. You know it can enable some type of global security. There are We have to align ourselves with people that are not democratic governments,

and where do you draw the line and if these stealing us for the singing ukraine- and I wonder what will what else and daring how'd you justify- only the Ukraine and all who bled repeating its launch it, and how do we surely have learned this over the last twenty years? We cannot compel democracy on nations that it is not in there in their within their history is not within the people's actual, genuine sincere interest in the sense that they are more than enough. In many cases there Kay with the government and the leadership they have. Let me Let me switch topics here cause I don't know how he defines freedom and repression either because We have had a growing surveillance state in this country for quite some time, and it is tat fine, there is no such thing is just met a data any more every, can be tracked down to the individual person and

you have just introduced legislation. It is said to prevent any intelligence agency from spying on american citizens. Don't we already have that law somewhere in the bill of rights? yeah we do and there no? In fact, we have it very explicitly in executive or orders. Indian registration- it's already exist, but here's the deal Glenn and I'm going to try to not be sarcastic about this. But I have to make this one point as the Us Us people do not trust government agencies any more pick what knew that the CDC was political. What we learned four five years ago, yeah, I J certainly are and end the in the CIA in Post Office is spying on us, so this is a and thank you for bringing this going because this important this administration came to power and they said the greatest threat facing our security is not once again, China, Russia or the.

in IRAN and North Korea, they said the greatest threat facing our own security is internal. They said it's. Why supremacy domestic violence extreme? db, you say call so well, then they use that just case, which is nonsense as I think that the average already of Americans would agree, but then I shall cable the intelligence. Community, for example the NSC Cia. They cannot collect intelligence, but now suddenly under this administration. They can receive intelligence. We'll tell me the difference what is it? You ve been doing collecting intelligence and receiving intelligence, and they then have used that new justification that New Jersey, you know it described Not a word, which I think we would all understand, shall cable. Now we argued Involve the national counterterrorism, training centre and the director of National tell just to write reports on domestic extremists which are by definition american citizens. It can

well, we are, I mean we found a very convenient way. We spy on England and they spy on us, and I don't even think we need that anymore. I mean, the problem is, is the intelligence agencies include all most, every agency now it's not that hard to do apparently and we are working together all around the world in somebody told me Chris. I said why and will the President shut this down and, and they said they never never was, the excuse will be everybody else. Has it and we can't be the only one that doesn't know what our citizens are doing so well go ahead. I I think it's fair to point this out. You know, this type of attitude towards american people, the

incredible abuse of department of Justice snippy. I that we saw in the russian hoax were there there were there literally lying to Congress again and they'd, be ended, their lives lying to the five records, etc that only happened under democratic administration and this redefinition of words where they cannot collect that they can receive once again only a Democrat administration is allowing that. So I don't think we've got a. I don't think we've got equal concerns, you're, certainly true the Republican Party ironically, because this is bit of a shift. Most of us were viewed as being defense hawks, but now or the protectors of privacy? It's day Shall you in our democratic colleagues and other such as them, who are saying, you know there, the ones who are fighting our our initiatives are efforts to try to retain privacy. Civil liberties for Americans, So what would be the punishment for, let's say, go just happens to say you know what we have all this data on people and we just gotta get it off our servers. Do you want to,

take a look at it: be the what would be the penalty for any from an agency yeah so if they are, the problem is I said when we first started anyway. There's already rules has already exacted. Orders is already legislation, but they don't a tribute any penalty to it. It's ok! This is about idea, but if you What are we're just going to remind you? It's a bad idea, we're going to move on, and so you know, but there's penalties attached, so there's no disincentive board and showed this ledge I would attach a penalty for it to to the person to the individual, so Let's just say you you you were involved in any of these. A the Russia Gate scandals what what kind of nobody would. You receive well an icy

and they're they're they're kind of apples and oranges, because the Russiagate scandal was just so clear. I mean there was clear deception. There was clear lying to agencies. There was clear, a deception to the fides of course, so it actually already is as you can imagine, and there are penalties attached to those kinds of behavior, this is a little bit different in the sense of are actually working under a what they believe is into executive authority and so clarifies that you don't have that authority and if you continue to plain that authority we're going. We're going to prosecute you for doing that, you can't do it and just say what we We have the authority to do it, no we're going to say very definitively. You do not so with the congressman Chris Stewart and his book is the final fight for freedom, which is a must read it it just in encapsulates almost all of the stuff that we are fighting against right now, and that is a wide array and it's all explain,

and in a very simple, simple way, and it's a little to little breathtaking body It is also written in a way to where it takes you on a story and then shows you the facts of that story and tells you exactly what's happening in our government. The final fight for freedom- and you can pick it up at bookstores now it it really is a must read Chris, want to talk to you a little bit about them. The maximum mother, lode of personal information, the programmable digital currency. That way now quote studying in Washington who, is the one that actually the arises. The currency. Is it Congress or is it the fad or who is it that as you can switch to a digital currency, that's actually great question Glenn and I'm not an expert on this I'll. Tell you my view, but that is

to that the carry on, and that is regardless approached authorized. It may not be the actual individual or agency should end up authorizing a digital currency, but I think that Congress ultimately has oversight on this. Clearly we do and clearly we authorize this now, the FED, as you know, no more than wha, certainly more than a more than I do, but as you indicate over and over again, the FED has taken powers into itself. Just like the president has over Congress. The FED has taken powers into itself that are just frightening over the last eighteen years and accelerating rapidly I mean in a breathtaking pace over the last five to eight years, going back, probably to two thousand and eight, and you know it It's an irony that the one thing people wanted from cryptocurrency the two you know to have an ability to not be manipulated by said policy or by whereby monetary policy

the creation of a government. Currency does exactly the opposite. I mean it it it behold in such a way as to where every virtually everything We do, including everywhere we go every every perfect purchase make- would be monitored the Chechen monitored and show you know it deems necessary corrected by cattle policy by gotta beer catches should frightened Eliza people. Ok! Well, Chris, would you look into that for me and see if there's anybody on the hill, that is at least even questioning the fan cause? I think this is going to come fast and furious claim there are. I promise you I I sat down for probably little more than an hour with Patrick Mchenry, who will be the next chairman of financial services. I just weak on this issue and and and a promise. You he's intensely aware of it he's intensely concerned, as as we are

sitting on that committee and being the chairman we pray and twenty twenty two. When we take over the house, he will play a key role in trying to trying to restrict what I think is is just a horrible horrible. I the industry once again. While I am glad to hear that Chris, thank you very much, aright the name it What is the final for fight for freedom? If you want to get into the fight he's? Just to introduce a new bill to prevent intelligence agencies from spying on american citizens. confine all of his information at Stuart DOT, house, DOT, Gov get involved? There are no bystanders