Sean Hannity highlights voting irregularities, calls on lawmakers to preserve election integrity
This is an unofficial transcript meant for reference. Accuracy is not guaranteed.
I cant,
I love it.
A great show welcome
to Hannity
at the end of this monologue. I
have a very special message for
radical socialist Democrats and
their cheerleaders in big tech
and media mob.
Many Americans do not believe
this election was fair and make
no mistake. Every American has a
right to feel that way.
I feel that way
its a corrupt and embarrassing
disgrace. You will come at the
american people deserve more. We
are capable of so much more.
We did send people to the moon
and back pretty big
accomplishment.
Many states ran perfect
elections with integrity that
people have full trust, and
confidence in
Democrats got everything they
wanted millions of mail in
ballots, many with no postmark
many received and counted after
election day. They are still
counting in some states.
Some states, no voter, I dot d
required no proof of
citizenship required weeks and
weeks of early voting poll.
Observer is blocked from viewing
the process which the law
actually allows them to do
specifically language in the
law. Other election laws
altered entirely disregarded and
right now, as we speak, there are
still outstanding votes that
have yet to be counted. It is
now nine days after election
day
today, more reports of dead
people voting from beyond the
grave amazing system we set up
coming up. Kayleigh Mcenany
has brand new sworn affidavits.
We have the one from Michigan
and she has some from another
state serious allegations under
the threat of perjury being made
a surrounding election
irregularities. This time in a
state of Pennsylvania
well also have more on Todays
big court ruling in that state.
Earlier, a judge sided with the
Trump campaign. A agreeing the
democratic Secretary of State is
not allowed to arbitrate.
Pushback Pennsylvanias vote
curing deadline. Three days past
the states legal limit not
allowed to do. That will have a
lot more on that. In a moment,
we will bring you shocking video
from Project VERITAS, allegedly
showing a United States postal
worker coerced and then
intimidated by federal agents.
After blowing the whistle on
voter fraud that he is
describing at the postal Service
Service,
first its time for a special
investigation, we have a lot of eyes to dot.
We have a lot of eyes to dot
teased, Duke Lacrosse, Uva, Fer
Baltimore. We take our time and
do some investigating
thats one of the major systems
that used to cast ballots. Last
week. The company is called
dominion, voting its used in twenty eight
states, as reported by John
Solomon. Several days ago,
dominion came under heavy fire
after allegations, their machines
caused thousands of votes and
one Michigan County to be
switched from Donald Trump to
Joe Biden. Take a look.
Ballots were counted for
Democrats that were meant for
Republicans, causing a six thousand vote
swing against our candidate,
the county clerk came forward
and the said tabulating software
glitched and caused a
miscalculation of the vote.
Since then, we have now
discovered that forty seven counties use
this same software in the same
capacity.
Antrim county had to hand count
all of the ballots, and these
counties that use the software
needs to closely examine the
result for similar
discrepancies.
Tonight we did reach
out to dominion and they were
claiming this was caused by a
human error. It had nothing to
do with their operating system,
but, according to several
reports, there may be a lot more
to this story.
Back in June, during Georgias
primary, there were a lot of
serious issues surrounding the
states voting machines
according to
the New York Times.
In some cases, machines require
extra power for aging polling
locations, blowing fuses and
never powering on
workers still being trained just
days before the election
struggled with the set up the
times goes on to write. The
electronic poll books also were
plagued by raising software and
user error during the
presidential election dominion.
Voting machines were used in all
of Georges one hundred and fifty nine counties and, as
we all know, that is a state
with a razor thin margin.
The question must be asked.
Dont expect the media mob to
ever ask it are to minions
systems prone to human error.
Seventy two million Americans voted for
Donald Trump.
All of us deserve an answer and
thats, not the only concern
being raised
in two thousand and eighteen lets. Go to the liberal
AP reporting that dominion long
skimped on security in favor of
convenience, making it more
difficult to detect intrusions
dominion. Voting systems were
rejected three times for
failing to meet basic, simple
security standards once
rejected in two thousand and thirteen twice rejected
in twenty nineteen.
That would be last year
in two thousand and eighteen, a prominent tenured
Princeton professor, who
specialized in election machine
Ray policy security. His name
is Andrew Lapel issued an op, Ed
blasting dominion over security
concerns. According to the
professor that Dominion image
cast evolution looks like a
pretty good voting machine, but
it has a serious design flaw
after you mark your ballot and
after you review your ballots,
the voting machine can print
more votes on it.
Thats a big problem.
Those legitimate software
installed by dominion, wont do
that, but the machine is
physically capable of it, and
fraudulent software can exploit
that ability.
During a hearing on Capitol Hill,
two thousand and seventeen a tenured professor
Princeton, I would assume a
pretty smart guy explained how
fraudulent software could be
used to seriously alter
elections
just two short years ago. Take a
look.
Each voting machine is a
computer running a computer
program
whether that computer counts the
votes accurately or makes
mistakes or cheats by shifting
votes from one candidate to
another depends on what software
is installed in the computer.
Installing software is how you
hack a voting machine to cheat.
I wrote a vote stealing program
that shifts votes. It takes
seven minutes per machine with a
screwdriver.
The software I built was not
rocket science. Any computer
programmer could write the same
code.
It could steal elections without
detection for years to come.
By saying this
happened with dominion. How
would I possibly know
we do know that there have been
so many warnings,
the New York Times, the
Associated Press congressional
hearings? You have the
attorney general and Secretary
of State of Texas, twice last
year, projecting rejecting the Sy
Princeton Tenured, professor, all
trying to warn us about this
system.
Twenty eight states used at this election
and ill add if we want to have
election results with integrity
that the people of this country
will have confidence in him. We
can easily and absolutely have a
system forensically, checked and
ill even argue, allowing both
republican and democratic
engineers to do the forensically
checked together.
If Texas rejected the system
three separate times dont, we
owe it to every American to know
which is the best, the most
reliable and accurate system. So
we can have confidence in the
voting in this country.
We are a powerful country, an
advanced country, guess what we
can and must eliminate any
chance of fraud or abuse and
corruption or questioning of
integrity and competence,
theres good reason to not have
confidence or not to believe
this is fair
in states with razor thin
margins. Like Georgia, Michigan
Pennsylvania, we must we owe it
to the american people to do all
due diligence and make sure that
every legal vote is counted.
Sadly, thats, especially hard to
do with widespread mail in
voting. The New York Times may
have actually forgotten their
own reporting kind of, like a
Joe Biden on this very subject
in two thousand and twelve, they warned about the
increased risk of fraud and
abuse that occurred with mail in
voting. They ran a front page
story, not saying Hannity is
awful or evil, and they cast
grave doubt on the reliability
of widespread mail. In voting and
indicated it was more vulnerable
to fraud than conventional
voting. The New York Times
said that
the New York Times they got
something right.
In the past several weeks we
have witnessed their predictions
play out in real time.
One particularly egregious
example came from a: u DOT S postal
service, whistle blower, his
name. By the way, I thought we
loved whistle blowers, even
hearsay, whistle blowers. His
name is Richard Hopkins.
He claimed postal workers were
fraudulently backdating mail in
ballots in Pennsylvania, a
similar charge made in Michigan.
We have not independently
confirmed the contents of the
footage from Project VERITAS, but
we will let you watch and decide
for yourself. You decide.
I saw the postmaster until
one of our supervisors to decide
and he told the supervisor that
the postmark was before
all these pallets are coming in
tomorrow. Yesterday they were
all supposed to be postmarked
before
followed the
allegations project VERITAS was
reporting that Hopkins was
subject to an hour long
interrogation were federal
agents, reportedly attempted to
intimidate him and actually get
Richard Hopkins, a
whistle blower to change his
story, but guess what
apparently its reported here
is undercover video showing part
of that interview by a guy that
we may suspect from Twitter,
which he has now taken down.
He doesnt like Donald Trump, but
unlike big tech companies. Well,
let you make the decision.
I am trying to twist to a
little bit because your mind
will kick in.
We like to control our minds and
when we do that, we can convince
ourselves of a memory when
youre under a little bit of
stress, which im doing to
purposely in your mind, can be
clearer.
We are going to do a different
exercise. To make your mind
clearer.
This is all on purpose:
im not scaring you, but I am
scaring you
Sp1. According to project
VERITAS, one of those federal
agents was a devout Democrat.
Frequently posting far left
political beliefs on twitter. By
the way they have been captured,
captured
he posted tweets praising Stacey
Abrams and encouraging people
not to watch the presidents
Town Hall on October, 15th
openly criticizing his mother
for praising Donald Trump and
watching Fox NEWS and even
spread to smears and a slander
about the presidents tax
returns that gets credited to
big tech
after the interrogation,
the Washington Post, not
sure where they got. This
live report at the
whistle blower Richard Hopkins
had recanted his claims of voter
fraud.
Richard Hopkins is calling not
reporting absolutely false and
hes now standing by his claims
that the Washington Post said
that he recanted take a look
for yourself.
Speak of these federal agents.
Have your back
at this point? No,
do you think they are
interested in investigating
fraud?
I dont think they are.
In fact you heard what
Eisenberg tell a supervisor.
Do you still stand by that?
Yes
Sp1, they said weve got to be
tough on you, weve got to make
sure this is the truth, its a
crime. If you lied to federal
agents,
remember George Papadopoulos
lying under oath, Roger Stone,
thats right only people that
lie that are republican ever
prosecuted
in two thousand and fourteen VOX dot com published a
poll. Fifty eight percent of Americans think
elections are rigged
guidance top pick for chief of
Staff RON claim. He said they
did everything wrong thats
because he says they are rigged.
Is this? What he was talking
about?
Is that what you meant,
or maybe youre talking about
the partisan observers that were
blocked and sign an affidavit
after affidavit or maybe youre
talking about state officials,
changing election laws two days
before the election or maybe
youre talking about dead people
who managed to vote from beyond
the grave
many states are getting
elections done fairly doing at
the right way.
The states that arent are.
Transcript generated on 2020-11-13.